DOCSLIB.ORG

Consumer Information on Animal Testing - Book Recommandations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consumer Information on Animal Testing - Book Recommandations Consumer Information on Animal Testing - Book Recommandations https://www.facebook.com/pages/Consumer-Information-on-Animal-Testing/313293675483039 More than 250 books to read in a lifetime – detailed description of the books and sorted by Publication Date “Scars show us where we have been, they do not dictate where we are going.” The list of books packed with knowledge is also an allegory of more than 150 years of struggle for dignity,respect , health and welfare for all living beings and the environment. The authors show us, that even when we have limitations we can always act accordingly . 1 Consumer Information on Animal Testing - Book Recommandations https://www.facebook.com/pages/Consumer-Information-on-Animal-Testing/313293675483039 Issues: Vivisection (animal test) The truth about bad and good science. Not validated animal test methods used for profit in Big Pharma companies. Health risk for human and animals. Scientist and doctors that rather would use alternative methods instead of in-vivo, but politically are forced to use animal models. Ethics, morality and double standards. Authors: A John Nocella, Adrian Stallwood, AFMA, Alan Cassels, Alan Watson, Albert Leffingwell,Albert Porter, Alberto Manganaro, Alix Fano, Amanda Flisher, Andre Menache, Animal aid, Andrew Knight, Andrew Linzey, Andrew ML Lever, Andrew Tyler, Angela McPherson, Aniela Jaff, Anita Guerrini, Annamaria Manzoni, Anthony J. Nocella, Antidote, Atsuko Matsuoka, Aysha Akhtar, B.Sc., Bantam, Baynard Kendrick, Ben Berkhout, Ben Goldacre, Bent Haller, Berdoe, Bette Overell, Birgitta Carlsson, Bruno J.R. Nicolaus, C. Ray Greek, Carl Hart, Carol J. Adams, Carsten Christophersen, Cary Wolfe, Charles Danten, Charles S. Myers, Chris Dubbs, Chris Hayhurs, Christine Stevens, Christopher Anderegg, Claude Bernard, Clifford Warwick, Clifton Flynn, Colin Burgess, Cora Diamond, Corina Gericke, Dan CohnSherbok, David Grimm, David Irvng, David Quammen., Deborah Rudacille, Dottor X, Drew Winter, E Hester, E.G. Vallianatos, Edward Anthony, Ellen och Johan Brtz, Emanuela Corsini, Emil Levine, Emily Anthes, Erin Lestrade, Fairchild, Frances Power Cobbe, Francesca Sorcinelli, Franco Travaglini, Frank R. Ascione, Gary L. Francione, Gary Wolf, Gnther Witzany, Gennaro Ciaburri, Gerald Sonnenfield, Gianluca Felicetti, Gianni Mannari, Gianni Tamino, Gill Langley, Glyn N. Stacey, Greg Goodale, Guglielmo Ferraro, Gunnar Theodr Eggertsson, Guylaine Lanctt, Hal Herzog, Hans Joachim Alpers, Hans Ruesch, Harry Salem,Helene Sarreseca, Helga Kuhse, Henk Van Loveren, Heny Trefflich, Herbert Stiller, HLS, Horton, Human Research Australia (HRA), Icare, Ian Freshney, Ian Hacking, Ingrid Newkirk, Ita Stein Gvirtzman, Ivan Avila Gaitan, Jane Goodall, Jane Leslie Conly, Jane Mann, Jarrod Bailey, Jason Black, Jason del Gandio, Jrgen Lemcke, Jean Swingle Greek, Jeffrey M. Smith, Jerzy Leszczynski, Jessica Speart, Jim Flash, JoAnne McArthur, Joachim Schafer, Joan Court,Joav Merrick, Johannes Jrgenson, John J. Pippin, John McDowell, John Olsen, John Pippin, John Sorensen, John Vyvyan, Jonathan M. Auerbach, Jos Kleinjans, Jose A. Centeno, Joseph Covino Jr., Jougla Audrey, Kara Davis, Kate Stewart, Kathy Archibald, Kathy Snow Guillermo, Keith Mann, Kenan Malik, Kim Socha, Kim Stallwood, Kristin ShraderFrechette, Lambert M. Surhone, Larry Butz, Lars Abrahamsen, Laura Grabel , Lawson Tait, Leffingwell, Leonardo Caffo, Linden Brough, Lisa Kemmerer, Lizzy Lind af Hageby, Lori Gruen, LUSH, M.D., M.d. Fadali, Marco Mamone Capria, Mark H. Bernstein, Mark T D Croninm, Mark Hawthorne, Mary Ellen Drayer, Massimo Tettamanti, Matiam T. Tennoe, Matthew Cole, Matthieu Ricard, Max Keller, McKay Jenkins, Mette Nielsen, Michael Balls, Michael Balls, Michael C. Carroll,Michela Kuan, Michelle Rokke, Michiya Matsusaki, Milda Bandzaite, Milly Schr Manzoli, Mira Manga, Misturu Akashi, Moneim Fadali, Monica Bertini, Murry J. Cohen, Niall Shanks, Nicola Loprieno, Nicolaas A. Rupke, Nina Boyd, Nirmala Bhogal, Olle Selinus, Otis Webb Brawley, Palgrave MacMillan, Paola Cavalieri, Paul Goldberg, Paul Illing, Penny Dransart, Peter C. Gtzsche, Peter Knights, Peter Laufer, Peter Singer, Phil Arkow, Philippe Grandjean, Piers Beirne, Pietro Croce, Pietrzykowski Tomasz, Pozas Terrados, R M Harrison, Raffaella Tolicetti, Ramesh C. Gupta, Ray Moynihan, Rene Bickel, Richard Adams, Richard Wagner, Rita Stiens, Robert B. Finkelman, Robert C. O Brian, Robert Combes, Robert Johnson, Robert S. Mendelsohn, Robert Sharpe, Roberta Kalechofsky, Roche, Rock Brynner, Rom Harr, Ruth Fox, Sahadeva Dasa, Samir Mejri, Sarak Kite, Sren Ventegodt, Sidney A. Katz, Stanley Cavell, Stefanie Merenyi, Stefano Cagno, Stephen Coleridge, Stephen R. Kaufman, Steven Best, Steven M. Wise, Susan F. Henssonow, Susan McPherson, Susanna Penco, Takami Akagi, Tom L. Beauchamp, Tomasz Puzyn, Tony Benn, Tony Page, Trent Stephens, Vagn Lundbye, Vernon Coleman, Vivian Spitz, Wendy Lee, Werner Hartinger, Wilkie Collins, William McBride, William Townsend, Winfried Ahne etc. The book cover of each suggested book in this book list is presented in a slideshow on youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKBuhcIscE 2 Consumer Information on Animal Testing - Book Recommandations https://www.facebook.com/pages/Consumer-Information-on-Animal-Testing/313293675483039 Kemi på hjernen - går ud over enhver forstand af Philippe Grandjean & Pernille Hermann Forlag:Gyldendal Udgivet:06112015 Lægen og miljømedicineren Philippe Grandjean har brugt store dele af et forskerliv på at undersøge forskellige industrikemikaliers indvirkning på hjernen. I en ny bog gør han status og advarer om, at næste generation af hjerner er i fare. Indsatsen begynder hos de mindste børn og de unge piger, for flere miljøgifte hober sig op i kroppen og går direkte videre til fosteret. Fremtidens kloge hoveder er afhængige af unge kvinders viden og vaner.“Vi har kun én chance for at udvikle en hjerne, og den er i fosterstadiet og de første leveår,” fastslår Philippe Grandjean, der har drevet forskningsprojekter i hele verden for at undersøge miljøets påvirkning af menneskers intelligens og udvikling.Bogen er Philippe Grandjeans personlige og let læste fortælling om disse forsøg og deres resultater. Den skræller lag på lag af årtiers uvidenhed, naivitet og korruption, som har ført til udbredelsen af de farlige miljøgifte. Og den fortæller om en af Danmarks skarpe forskere og hans livslange arbejde i milj øets tjeneste. PROFESSION : ANIMAL DE LABORATOIRE Auteur: Jougla Audrey Producteur: Autrement Parution: 23.09.2015 La journaliste et philosophe raconte son enquête dans des laboratoires français publics et privés, pour un documentaire caméra cachée sur les tests menés sur les animaux et la prise en compte de la souffrance animale. Critique du scientifique André Ménache Posté le 19 septembre 2015 par Luce Lapin: "Une enquête inédite, en caméra cachée, dans le silence « de ces labos, trop secrets pour ne pas être honteux ». Une première excellente critique d’un scientifique. À paraître mercredi 23 septembre 2015. Audrey Jougla dévoile avec grand courage la face cachée de la recherche impliquant les animaux de laboratoires et éclaircit par la suite la désensibilisation presque inaperçue du personnel impliqué dans cette recherche. Son œuvre constitue une mise à jour importante, d’où va découler une prise de conscience du grand public sur ce que revêt réellement l’expérimentation animale en France aujourd’hui. On comprend à présent pourquoi ces chercheurs préfèrent garder leur petit secret. Ceuxci devront, dans un premier temps, se préparer à apporter des réponses cohérentes aux contribuables et en second lieu accepter de participer à un débat rigoureusement scientifique : en quoi — contrairement aux connaissances actuelles en matière de biologie de l’évolution — l’animal, selon ces chercheurs, représentetil un modèle fiable pour l’étude des maladies humaines ? Cette œuvre s’ajoute aux faits récents (l’initiative citoyenne européenne Stop Vivisection notamment) qui font de l’expérimentation animale une « patate chaude » pour les chercheurs qui voudraient nous faire croire encore en ce XXIe siècle que tout cela est un « mal nécessaire ». Il reste dès lors à mobiliser les scientifiques honnêtes et possédant l’esprit critique requis pour ce métier, afin que l’édifice de l’expérimentation animale puisse s’effondrer comme un château de cartes." André Ménache, Docteur vétérinaire, Directeur d’Antidote Europe, Comité scientifique pour une science responsable. Dødelig psykiatri og organiseret fornægtelse af Peter C. Gøtzsche - Forlag: People´s Press Udgivet 31082015 Psykiatrien har desværre ændret behandlingstilgang og har i vid udstrækning forladt den biopsykosociale sygdomsmodel. I stedet bliver lægemidler set som "løsningen" på alle problemer. Men denne tilgang er skadelig og har alvorlige konsekvenser. De fleste patienter responderer ikke på den medicin de får, hvilket leder psykiaterne til at ordinere flere lægemidler og øge doserne. "Dødelig psykiatri og organiseret fornægtelse" argumenterer for at den måde psykofarmaka anvendes i dag gør langt mere skade end gavn. Formentligt kan alle psykofarmaka fremkalde hjerneskader ved langtidsbrug. Hvert år dræber psykofarmaka en halv million mennesker i USA og Europa, der er mindst 65 år gamle. Derfor er psykofarmaka den tredje hyppigste dødsårsag efter hjertesygdomme og cancer. "Dødelig psykiatri og organiseret fornægtelse" er skrevet af professor og overlæge, Peter C. Gøtzsche, der er grundlægger af det internationale uafhængige forskningscenter The Nordic Cochrane
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Estimate of the Number of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes
    Research Article Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 1–18 ª The Author(s) 2020 An Estimate of the Number of Animals Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions Used for Scientific Purposes Worldwide DOI: 10.1177/0261192919899853 in 2015 journals.sagepub.com/home/atl Katy Taylor and Laura Rego Alvarez Abstract Few attempts have been made to estimate the global use of animals in experiments, since our own estimated figure of 115.2 million animals for the year 2005. Here, we provide an update for the year 2015. Data from 37 countries that publish national statistics were standardised against the definitions of ‘animals’ and ‘procedures’ used in the European Union (EU) Directive 2010/63/EU. We also applied a prediction model, based on publication rates, to estimate animal use in a further 142 countries. This yielded an overall estimate of global animal use in scientific procedures of 79.9 million animals, a 36.9% increase on the equivalent estimated figure for 2005, of 58.3 million animals. We further extrapolated this estimate to obtain a more comprehensive final global figure for the number of animals used for scientific purposes in 2015, of 192.1 million. This figure included animals killed for their tissues, normal and genetically modified (GM) animals without a harmful genetic mutation that are used to maintain GM strains and animals bred for laboratory use but not used. Since the 2005 study, there has been no evident increase in the number of countries publishing data on the numbers of animals used in experiments. Without regular, accurate statistics, the impact of efforts to replace, reduce and refine animal experiments cannot be effectively monitored.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Becoming and Remaining Vegetarian
    Wang, Yahong (2020) Vegetarians in modern Beijing: food, identity and body techniques in everyday experience. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/77857/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Vegetarians in modern Beijing: Food, identity and body techniques in everyday experience Yahong Wang B.A., M.A. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and Political Sciences College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow March 2019 1 Abstract This study investigates how self-defined vegetarians in modern Beijing construct their identity through everyday experience in the hope that it may contribute to a better understanding of the development of individuality and self-identity in Chinese society in a post-traditional order, and also contribute to understanding the development of the vegetarian movement in a non-‘Western’ context. It is perhaps the first scholarly attempt to study the vegetarian community in China that does not treat it as an Oriental phenomenon isolated from any outside influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Derogatory Discourses of Veganism and the Reproduction of Speciesism in UK 1 National Newspapers Bjos 1348 134..152
    The British Journal of Sociology 2011 Volume 62 Issue 1 Vegaphobia: derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK 1 national newspapers bjos_1348 134..152 Matthew Cole and Karen Morgan Abstract This paper critically examines discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers in 2007. In setting parameters for what can and cannot easily be discussed, domi- nant discourses also help frame understanding. Discourses relating to veganism are therefore presented as contravening commonsense, because they fall outside readily understood meat-eating discourses. Newspapers tend to discredit veganism through ridicule, or as being difficult or impossible to maintain in practice. Vegans are variously stereotyped as ascetics, faddists, sentimentalists, or in some cases, hostile extremists. The overall effect is of a derogatory portrayal of vegans and veganism that we interpret as ‘vegaphobia’. We interpret derogatory discourses of veganism in UK national newspapers as evidence of the cultural reproduction of speciesism, through which veganism is dissociated from its connection with debates concerning nonhuman animals’ rights or liberation. This is problematic in three, interrelated, respects. First, it empirically misrepresents the experience of veganism, and thereby marginalizes vegans. Second, it perpetuates a moral injury to omnivorous readers who are not presented with the opportunity to understand veganism and the challenge to speciesism that it contains. Third, and most seri- ously, it obscures and thereby reproduces
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • United States V. Fullmer and the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act: "True Threats" to Advocacy Michael Hill
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 61 | Issue 3 2011 United States v. Fullmer and the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act: "True Threats" to Advocacy Michael Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Hill, United States v. Fullmer and the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act: "True Threats" to Advocacy, 61 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 981 (2011) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol61/iss3/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. UNITED STATES V. FULLMER AND THE ANIMAL ENTERPRISE TERRORISM ACT: “TRUE THREATS” TO ADVOCACY INTRODUCTION The past three decades witnessed the emergence of animal law and a diffusion of animal welfare beliefs and practices throughout society.1 An increasing number of Americans adhere to vegetarianism and veganism, oppose the use of animals in research, and believe that animals have the right to an existence free from suffering.2 This increased acceptance, like most change, is directly attributable to the efforts of advocates and the robust and uninhibited protection of speech that the First Amendment affords them, but recent 1 The Animal Legal Defense Fund was founded in 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Non-Human Primates in Research in Primates Non-Human of Use The
    The use of non-human primates in research The use of non-human primates in research A working group report chaired by Sir David Weatherall FRS FMedSci Report sponsored by: Academy of Medical Sciences Medical Research Council The Royal Society Wellcome Trust 10 Carlton House Terrace 20 Park Crescent 6-9 Carlton House Terrace 215 Euston Road London, SW1Y 5AH London, W1B 1AL London, SW1Y 5AG London, NW1 2BE December 2006 December Tel: +44(0)20 7969 5288 Tel: +44(0)20 7636 5422 Tel: +44(0)20 7451 2590 Tel: +44(0)20 7611 8888 Fax: +44(0)20 7969 5298 Fax: +44(0)20 7436 6179 Fax: +44(0)20 7451 2692 Fax: +44(0)20 7611 8545 Email: E-mail: E-mail: E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Web: www.acmedsci.ac.uk Web: www.mrc.ac.uk Web: www.royalsoc.ac.uk Web: www.wellcome.ac.uk December 2006 The use of non-human primates in research A working group report chaired by Sir David Weatheall FRS FMedSci December 2006 Sponsors’ statement The use of non-human primates continues to be one the most contentious areas of biological and medical research. The publication of this independent report into the scientific basis for the past, current and future role of non-human primates in research is both a necessary and timely contribution to the debate. We emphasise that members of the working group have worked independently of the four sponsoring organisations. Our organisations did not provide input into the report’s content, conclusions or recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vivisection from an Ethical Point of View
    VIVISECTION FROM AN ETHICAL POINT OF VIEW. THE EVILS OF VIVISECTION. From personal experience and a near relationship with hospitals, schools, biological laboratories, and experimental work-rooms, I know that I am right in believing that my scientific brethren ought to be supervised, cautioned, and re^ strained by a firm hand. Alas, I know full well, as myself a worker, that our work called Science, as now pursued, is not an end in itself, fails as yet to point out the solution of all life, and in the case of many of its votaries has produced a narrow- mg scholastic result. So thought in large degree, so lived in the inspiration of his research, so often taught by his action, my departed friend Professor Cope. To my mind the enthusiastic advocates of humanity and mercy, often weak of mind, hardly ever logical, are after all in the deepest sense right, because of no self- indulgent weakness have some of us encouraged them as far as reason permits, in the attempt to restrain and supervise the whole thing. Let them take it out of the hands of the conceited doctor, or the smart biological assistant. You know what I mean. With us your voice should speak. To shrink from cruelty, from the sight of torture as we shrink from a vile smell, from the ravages of disease, or an act of barbarism, as a thing to shudder at, as a thing that runs through you, and changes the heart-beat whether or no. This, to my mind, is an unfolding of the deeper meaning of that struggle to which you allude.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PROTEIN REIMAGINED. IMPACT AMPLIFIED. Dear Friends
    2019 PROTEIN REIMAGINED. IMPACT AMPLIFIED. Dear Friends, Without imagination, we cannot see beyond the status quo. Without focusing on YOUR impact, we cannot change the status quo. Bold imagination and a commitment to driving change unify The Good IMPACT Food Institute’s visionary donor family, our tireless team, and the paradigm- shifting scientists, policymakers, students, investors, corporate executives, and AMPLIFIED entrepreneurs we support. Together, we are building a sustainable, healthy, and just food system. The year 2019 saw stunning developments across plant-based and cultivated meat. Plant-based meat took fast food by storm. The world’s largest meat I support GFI because producers added plant proteins either to their product lines or to their investment they embody the greatest portfolios. The Indian, European, Japanese, and Singaporean governments began impact coupled with the funding cultivated meat research. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced a joint regulatory highest integrity. They are framework, bringing cultivated meat a step closer to our tables. creating a global food revolution by bringing Our second annual Good Food Conference convened global food conglomerates together and advising and startups, corporate venture arms and impact investors, life science scientists, entrepreneurs, companies and university researchers, and government officials and students. investors, and government With so much creativity and capacity for impact at the same table, significant officials.” progress is often just a connection or conversation away. —CAMERON ICARD, This year in review highlights the progress GFI’s donor family, advisors, BOARD MEMBER, DONOR volunteers, and team have made in fostering a collaborative scientific ecosystem, securing government support and fair regulation, and growing protein innovation in the United States and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberación Animal 1972 - 1986 Datos De La Edición Original: Against All Odds
    Liberación animal 1972 - 1986 Datos de la edición original: Against all odds. Animal Liberation 1972-1986 Impreso y editado por ARC PRINT. Editado por primera vez en el Estado español por Eztabaida Argitalpenak en 2010. Traducciones de la presente edición a cargo de: Inma Navarro (texto principal), Promoviendo el Veganismo y ochodoscuatro ediciones. Correcciones de la presente edición a cargo de: Nahid Steingress, Regina Sanchís y Gabriela Parada Mtz. Todas las notas al pie han sido redactadas por las traductoras, correctoras o personas del colectivo editorial, de la presente edición o de la anterior. Ilustración de portada: ochodoscuatro ediciones. Las fotografías que aparecen en las tripas de este libro son, en su mayoría, cortesía de Lewis Pogson y John McKenzie como parte de su archivo personal. Algunas otras son recortes de revistas accesibles en el archivo digital The Talon Conspiracy. Esta edición ve la luz por primera vez en Madrid, en junio de 2019. ochodoscuatro ediciones Depósito Legal: M-14981-2019 ISBN: 978-84-946223-8-0 Todos los beneficios de este libro irán destinados a la difusión de las ideas antiespecistas. Queda terminantemente recomendada la difusión total o parcial de esta obra siempre y cuando se utilice con fines no comerciales. Para cualquier otro uso, es necesaria la autorización expresa de la asamblea de la editorial. Este libro está dedicado a: Sally – 2 años, Lesley – 6 meses, Bev – 2 años, Virginia – 18 meses, Nancy – 6 meses, Debbie – 2 años, Delia – 2 años, Peter – 2 años, Eric – 18 meses, David – 2 años, Paul – 2,5 años, Karl – 18 meses, Duncan – 2 años, Jim – 2 años, Nick – 2 años, Nigel – 2 años, Alistair – 18 meses, Carl – 18 meses, Boris – 6 meses, Gary – 18 meses, Keith – 2 años, Mike – 18 meses, Julian – 12 meses, Alan – 2 años, y Sally – 12 meses.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting the Implementation of the Three Rs in European Primate and Mouse Research Papers: Are We Making Progress?
    ATLA 38, 495–517, 2010 495 Reporting the Implementation of the Three Rs in European Primate and Mouse Research Papers: Are We Making Progress? Katy Taylor British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, London, UK Summary — It is now more than 20 years since both Council of Europe Convention ETS123 and EU Directive 86/609?EEC were introduced, to promote the implementation of the Three Rs in animal experi- mentation and to provide guidance on animal housing and care. It might therefore be expected that reports of the implementation of the Three Rs in animal research papers would have increased during this period. In order to test this hypothesis, a literature survey of animal-based research was conducted. A ran- domly-selected sample from 16 high-profile medical journals, of original research papers arising from European institutions that featured experiments which involved either mice or primates, were identified for the years 1986 and 2006 (Total sample = 250 papers). Each paper was scored out of 10 for the incidence of reporting on the implementation of Three Rs-related factors corresponding to Replacement (justification of non-use of non-animal methods), Reduction (statistical analysis of the number of animals needed) and Refinement (housing aspects, i.e. increased cage size, social housing, enrichment of cage environment and food; and procedural aspects, i.e. the use of anaesthesia, analgesia, humane endpoints, and training for procedures with positive reinforcement). There was no significant increase in overall reporting score over time, for either mouse or primate research. By 2006, mouse research papers scored an average of 0 out of a possible 10, and primate research papers scored an average of 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • How the “Internal Brakes” on Violent Escalation Work and Fail: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Intra-Group Processes of Restraint in Militant Groups
    Studies in Conflict & Terrorism ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uter20 How the “Internal Brakes” on Violent Escalation Work and Fail: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Intra-Group Processes of Restraint in Militant Groups Joel Busher , Donald Holbrook & Graham Macklin To cite this article: Joel Busher , Donald Holbrook & Graham Macklin (2021): How the “Internal Brakes” on Violent Escalation Work and Fail: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Intra-Group Processes of Restraint in Militant Groups, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2021.1872156 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1872156 © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Published online: 18 Jan 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 562 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uter20 STUDIES IN CONFLICT & TERRORISM https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1872156 How the “Internal Brakes” on Violent Escalation Work and Fail: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Intra-Group Processes of Restraint in Militant Groups Joel Bushera , Donald Holbrookb , and Graham Macklinc aCentre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University, Coventry, UK; bDepartment of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK; cCenter for Research on Extremism (CREX), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY This article advances the emergent literature on restraint within mili- Received 29 July 2020 tant groups in three ways. First, it offers a framework for situating Accepted 27 December 2020 the “internal brakes on violent escalation”—understood as the practi- ces through which group members shape the outer limits of their action repertoires—in relation to the interplay between conflict dynamics, intra-group processes and individual-level decision mak- ing.
    [Show full text]