DOCSLIB.ORG

Precision-Radar-Valadition-An.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Precision-Radar-Valadition-An.Pdf Techniques for Precision Validation of Radar System Performance in the Field Using FieldFox handheld analyzers Application Note This application note provides an overview of field testing radar systems and Line Replaceable Units (LRU) using high-performance FieldFox combination analyzers having multiple measurement modes including a peak power analyzer, vector network analyzer, spectrum analyzer and vector voltmeter. This application note will show several measurement examples of pulsed and secondary radar signals and also reviews the basics of monopulse radar. Carry precision with you. Introduction Modern radar systems are typically classi- For example, figure 1a shows a field and Line Replaceable Units (LRU) using fied as ground-based, airborne, ship-based measurement of a beacon interroga- high-performance FieldFox combination or space borne. Radars have numerous tion waveform captured using a peak analyzers having multiple measurement applications including civilian air-traffic power sensor and FieldFox analyzer. The modes including a peak power analyzer, control, meteorology, traffic enforcement waveform includes coded-pulse pairs for vector network analyzer, spectrum analyzer and military air defense. Key aspects of any requesting aircraft identity and altitude. This and vector voltmeter. This application note will show several measurement examples radar system include frequency of operation, time domain measurement display shows of pulsed and secondary radar signals and waveform characteristics and antenna type. the pulse profile as a function of time and also reviews the basics of monopulse radar Unmodulated continuous wave (CW) radars includes a table for peak power, average starting in the next section. can measure target velocity and angular power, pulse width and rise and fall times. position. Range information is typically Figure 1b shows the measured spectrum extracted using some form of modulation of a radar transmitter using a rectangular such as a pulsed waveform. These types pulsed waveform. This frequency domain of “primary” radars work by transmitting a measurement can be used to determine waveform that is reflected off the target’s the center frequency of the RF carrier as surface and then these echoes are mea- well as the absolute amplitude of individual sured at the radar’s receiver. There are other frequency components. types of secondary or “beacon radars” cre- ating a two-way data link between a ground When maintaining and troubleshooting station and an aircraft. Secondary radar radar systems and components in the originated from the Identification Friend or field, it is often necessary to measure Foe (IFF) radar system developed during both the time domain and frequency World War II and complements the limita- domain performance over a variety of test conditions. While traditional methods for tions of the primary radar. Modern beacon measuring time and frequency performance systems, such as the Air Traffic Control of radar systems included 3-4 different Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS), separate benchtop instruments, modern “all-in-one” the interrogation and reply frequencies or combination analyzers provide the most resulting in stronger received signal levels at convenient and economical solution to the ground station and improved weather- field testing. This application note provides related performance. an overview of field testing radar systems (a) Beacon waveform in time (b) Spectrum of a radar pulse Figure 1. (1a) Time domain measurement of a beacon interrogation waveform and (1b) frequency domain measurement of a pulsed radar signal 2 Monopulse radar basics One of the most widely used radar tech- The received signals from the sum and dif- niques for deriving the angular information ference antenna ports are downconverted of a target is the monopulse system. The and measured by the radar’s signal process- monopulse technique can estimate these ing subsystem for target detection. It is very angles with higher accuracy than compa- important that amplitude and phase tracking rable systems while using a single (mono) is tightly controlled between the sum and pulse measurement in time. Figure 2 shows difference channels otherwise errors in a simplified block diagram of a monopulse angle calculations will occur. A low-noise radar with capability for determining target stable local oscillator, or STALO, provides angle in either elevation or azimuth. The the signal source for the downconversion. transmitter creates a pulsed waveform that is applied to a duplexing network, such One issue with this basic monopulse system as a circulator or switch, which directs occurs at short ranges when the antenna the high power signal to the antenna. If sidelobes may receive signals high enough the antenna is mechanically rotated, the to exceed the detection threshold and connection between the transmitter and the incorrectly report a target. The next section antenna is managed through a rotary joint. reviews a technique for suppressing any The transmit signal is applied to the “sum” large amplitude signals that may enter (sigma) port of the antenna assembly which through the sidelobes of the antenna pattern. ideally creates a thin beamwidth pattern that is perpendicular to the antenna plane. This beam direction is often called the boresight of the antenna. This transmitted signal illuminates the target which returns a reflected signal. The receive antenna simultaneously creates two overlapping pat- terns referred to as the “sum” (sigma) and “difference” (delta) patterns. As shown in the figure, the sum pattern maintains a peak in the boresight direction and the difference pattern contains a null in the boresight direction. In this figure, the antenna pattern sidelobes are omitted for simplicity. Transmitter Σ Σ Duplexer Σ ∆ IF RF Rotary Monopulse Receiver Receiver Joint Antenna Σ ∆ ∆ ∆ Antenna STALO Patterns Figure 2. Simplified block diagram of a monopulse radar system 3 Monopulse radar with sidelobe suppression When there is a possibility that false detec- level in the omega channel relative to the tions can result from energy entering the sum channel are assumed to be signals sidelobes in the monopulse antenna pattern, coming from the antenna’s sidelobe. The a secondary “omnidirectional” antenna may total receiver gain of the omega channel be added to the system to improve the over- can also be adjusted and also used to all detection performance. Figure 3 shows cancel the undesired energy received from the addition of a secondary receiver which the sidelobe. The technique of adding the includes the omnidirectional antenna with secondary (omega) channel to improve the pattern labeled with an “omega” symbol. performance of a monopulse radar system The antenna gain of the omnidirectional is called Sidelobe Suppression (SLS). The antenna is lower than the peak gain of secondary channel in figure 3 also shows the sum pattern and this gain difference a second transmitter connected to the will be useful when determining if a target omnidirectional antenna through a separate is within the boresight of the antenna. duplexer. This auxiliary transmitter is impor- Figure 3 includes a representation of the tant to beacon systems when attempting to sidelobes in the sum pattern. In the signal identify the location of an aircraft relative processor, the outputs from the sum, differ- to the ground station. The next section ence and omega channels are compared shows an application for using this auxiliary and those signals having higher power transmitter in air traffic control radar. Transmitter Σ Σ Duplexer Σ IF RF Rotary Monopulse Receiver Receiver Joint Antenna ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ STALO Ω Σ IF RF Duplexer Rotary Omni Ω Ω Joint Ω Antenna Antenna Receiver Receiver Patterns Transmitter Figure 3. Simplified block diagram of a monopulse radar system with sidelobe suppression (SLS) 4 Application of sidelobe suppression to Radar Beacon System A typical Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon a 21 microsecond spacing (Mode C). The at the boresight of the antenna system System (ATCRBS) is based on the similar P1/P3 pulse sequence is transmitted by the (position #1). When the aircraft is located block diagram to the monopulse system high-gain sum (sigma) antenna. off boresight, shown as position #2 in figure previously discussed in figure 3. The beacon 4, the received P1 amplitude no longer system is a two-way “data link” between To avoid undesired replies from aircraft tran- exceeds P2 and the aircraft transponder will a ground station and a transponder that is sponders receiving energy from a sidelobe not reply to any ground station requests. As installed onboard the aircraft. The data link of the sum antenna, the ground station the antenna system is mechanically rotated begins when the ground station transmits transmits a secondary pulse, shown in figure in azimuth, the aircraft at location #2 will an interrogation signal requesting the air- 4 as the P2 pulse. This secondary pulse is eventually enter the main beam and prop- craft’s identification or altitude. The aircraft transmitted through the omnidirectional erly reply to ground station interrogations. transponder replies with the requested data. (omega) antenna. The timing relationship The ground station-to-transponder transmis- places the P2 pulse between P1 and P3. As During installation, periodic maintenance sions occur at a carrier frequency of 1030 all the pulses are transmitted on the same and troubleshooting of this or any radar MHz. The transponder-to-ground station 1030 MHz carrier, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radio Spectrum Resource Assessment of the Band 450 Mhz to 5 Ghz
    Radio Spectrum Resource Assessment of the band 450 MHz to 5 GHz SRMC & GSMA 2014.07 1 / 44 450MHz-5GHz 关注频段频谱资源评估报告 国家无线电监测中心 全球移动通信系统协会 2014.07 2 / 44 Contents 0. Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2. Frequency allocation and station information ........................................................ 9 2.1. Frequency bands .............................................................................................. 9 2.2. Frequency allocation in each band .................................................................. 9 2.3. Registered radio station information ............................................................. 10 3. Frequency occupation measurement scheme ....................................................... 11 3.1. Test sites ........................................................................................................ 11 3.2. Duration of monitoring.................................................................................. 13 3.3. Measurement equipment ............................................................................... 13 3.4. Parameters setting ......................................................................................... 14 4. Measurement results ............................................................................................. 16 4.1. 470-566 MHz ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Award of 2.3 and 3.4 Ghz Spectrum Bands Information Memorandum
    The award of 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands Information Memorandum Publication date: 11 July 2017 Award of the 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands – Information Memorandum Important Notice This Information Memorandum (Memorandum) has been prepared by Ofcom in connection with the proposed award of licences in the 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands by auction. Terms and expressions used in this Memorandum are as defined in annex 10 of this Memorandum, or in the text of the Memorandum itself. The Award Process will be conducted in accordance with regulations to be made by Ofcom pursuant to powers under Section 14 of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006, pursuant to which the grant of the licences may be made following a procedure set out in regulations issued by Ofcom. The regulations to be made in respect of this award are referred to in this Memorandum as the Regulations. A copy of the draft Regulations and a Notice of Ofcom’s proposals to make regulations have been published alongside this Memorandum and can be found on Ofcom’s website at www.ofcom.org.uk . Recipients of this Memorandum should note that only the Regulations will have statutory effect. Accordingly, in the event of any difference between this Memorandum and the provisions of the Regulations, the Regulations are definitive and will prevail. This Memorandum has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed award of licences in the 2.3 and 3.4 GHz spectrum bands, and has been made available for information purposes only. This Memorandum does not constitute an offer or invitation to participate in the Award Process, nor does it constitute the basis for any part of any contract which may be concluded in relation to the Award Process or in respect of any award of licences.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiodetermination, Air Traffic and Maritime Services Licence Guidelines
    Guidelines Radiodetermination, Air Traffic and Maritime Services Licence Guidelines Document No: ComReg 11/07R1 Date: May 2017 This document does not constitute legal, commercial, financial, technical or other advice and the Commission for Communications Regulation shall not, at any time, be bound by the contents of this document which do not necessarily set out the Commission’s final or definitive position in any particular matter. The Commission reserves its right to act at all times in accordance with its statutory functions and objectives and this may include reaching a decision or taking an action which is at variance with all or any part of these guidelines. An Coimisiún um Rialáil Cumarsáide Commission for Communications Regulation One Dockland Central, Guild Street, Dublin 1, D01 E4X0, Ireland Telephone +353 1 804 9600 Fax +353 1 804 9680 Email [email protected] Web www.comreg.ie Radiodetermination, Air Traffic & Maritime Services Guidelines Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 3 2 Radiodetermination, Air Traffic and Maritime Services – An Overview ..... 4 3 Air Traffic Services Licence ............................................................... 7 3.1 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS .......................................... 8 4 Maritime Services Licence ................................................................ 9 4.1 LAND BASED MARITIME MOBILE ................................................................ 10 4.2 LAND BASED PRIVATE MARITIME
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.110
    SUBCHAPTER D—SAFETY AND SPECIAL RADIO SERVICES PART 80—STATIONS IN THE 80.71 Operating controls for stations on land. MARITIME SERVICES 80.72 Antenna requirements for coast sta- tions. Subpart A—General Information 80.74 Public coast station facilities for a te- lephony busy signal. GENERAL 80.76 Requirements for land station control Sec. points. 80.1 Basis and purpose. 80.2 Other regulations that apply. STATION REQUIREMENTS—SHIP STATIONS 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this chap- 80.79 Inspection of ship station by a foreign ter. Government. 80.5 Definitions. 80.80 Operating controls for ship stations. 80.7 Incorporation by reference. 80.81 Antenna requirements for ship sta- tions. Subpart B—Applications and Licenses 80.83 Protection from potentially hazardous RF radiation. 80.11 Scope. 80.13 Station license required. OPERATING PROCEDURES—GENERAL 80.15 Eligibility for station license. 80.17 Administrative classes of stations. 80.86 International regulations applicable. 80.21 Supplemental information required. 80.87 Cooperative use of frequency assign- 80.25 License term. ments. 80.31 Cancellation of license. 80.88 Secrecy of communication. 80.37 One authorization for a plurality of 80.89 Unauthorized transmissions. stations. 80.90 Suspension of transmission. 80.39 Authorized station location. 80.91 Order of priority of communications. 80.41 Control points and dispatch points. 80.92 Prevention of interference. 80.43 Equipment acceptable for licensing. 80.93 Hours of service. 80.45 Frequencies. 80.94 Control by coast or Government sta- 80.47 Operation during emergency. tion. 80.49 Construction and regional service re- 80.95 Message charges.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Order 7110.10Y, Flight Services
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.10Y CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 2 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: November 10, 2016 SUBJ: Flight Services 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.10Y, Flight Services, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to select offices in Washington headquarters, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and to all air traffic field facilities, international aviation field offices, and the interested aviation public. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and http://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_ notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington headquarters, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, and to all air traffic field facilities, international aviation field offices, and the interested aviation public. 6. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 7. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Distribution: ZAT-793; ZAT-464; Initiated By: AJR-0 ZAT-423 (External) Vice President, System Operations Services 11/10/16 JO 7110.10Y CHG 2 Flight Services Explanation of Changes Change 2 Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecc Report 157 the Impact of Spurious Emissions Of
    ECC REPORT 157 Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) ECC REPORT 157 THE IMPACT OF SPURIOUS EMISSIONS OF RADARS AT 2.8, 5.6 AND 9.0 GHz ON OTHER RADIOCOMMUNICATION SERVICES/SYSTEMS Cardiff, January 2011 ECC REPORT 157 Page 2 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This ECC Report presents detailed analysis of the impact of fixed radiodetermination systems on other services/systems (i.e. Fixed service (P-P application), Mobile service (RLAN in 5 GHz band) and Radioastronomy service) operating in adjacent or different bands. This analysis was done on a theoretical approach, but results of some measurements of existing filtering solutions were also considered. A number of cases have been considered of major importance for defining levels of unwanted emissions in the spurious domain giving confidence of reasonably low occurrence probability of interference. Particular attention has been given to meteorological radars, which represent the majority of fixed installations presently subject to the 100 dBPEP attenuation required in ERC/REC 74-01. Further consideration was given to the levels in ERC/REC 74-01. In relation to FS, the Report considered: the impact of spurious emission, the very high power of the primary radars under consideration confirm the common assumption that, whichever would be the spurious limit in dBc, main-beam to main-beam coupling between radars and FS stations is not possible because in all cases the protection distance is in the order of several tens of km (in most cases lies beyond the horizon). Therefore, it is assumed that information about the FS and radar locations are known to administrations licensing their use; the impact of typical C band meteo radars on the variation of the potentially blocked azimuth angles for FS stations in the 6-8 GHz band was considered as more representative case.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Characteristics and Performance Criteria for Systems in the Meteorological Aids Service in the 403 Mhz and 1 680 Mhz Bands
    Recommendation ITU-R RS.1165-3 (12/2018) Technical characteristics and performance criteria for systems in the meteorological aids service in the 403 MHz and 1 680 MHz bands RS Series Remote sensing systems ii Rec. ITU-R RS.1165-3 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Recommendations (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REC/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management SNG Satellite news gathering TF Time signals and frequency standards emissions V Vocabulary and related subjects Note: This ITU-R Recommendation was approved in English under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tdma Broadcast Satellite / Ground Architecture for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network
    A TDMA BROADCAST SATELLITE / GROUND ARCHITECTURE FOR THE AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Mohammed A. Shamma, Rajesh S. Raghavan Analex Corporation, Cleveland, OH 44142 Contract NAS3-00145, NASA Glenn Research Center Abstract: An initial evaluation of a TDMA research stage [ 11. Several communication satellite broadcast architecture with an links, technologies, and architectures were integrated ground network is proposed in considered which differ in complexity, cost, this study as one option for the Aeronautical and the time frame for its implementation. Telecommunications Network (ATN). The Here we are proposing an architecture based architecture proposed consists of a ground on the following objectives: based network that is dedicated to the - Cost: A system that takes into reception and transmissions of Automatic account the initial cost of Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) implementation. Considering the messages from Mode-S or UAT type fact that such architectures are not systems, along with tracks from primary and mass produced, the initial cost secondary surveillance radars. Additionally, will likely determine the expected the ground network could contain VHF final costs. Digital Link Mode 2, 3 or 4 transceivers for - New but tested technologies: In this the reception and transmissions of we mean a system that relies on Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications technologies that are new but (CPDLC) messages and for voice. The already tested as oppose to being second part of the ATN network consists of in the initial research stage. Also a broadcast satellite based system that is minimum use of what is defined mainly dedicated for the transmission of as older technologies is assumed. surveillance data as well as En-route Flight - Enough Room for Technology Information Service Broadcast (FIS-B) to all growth: while the cost and the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Beacon Transponder (RBX) Functional Description
    FAA-RD-80-135 Project Report ATC-104 Radar Beacon Transponder (RBX) Functional Description R.G. Sandholm 18 February 1981 Lincoln Laboratory MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW AND SHRY 1.1 Introduction 1 RBX Concept 1 ) 1.2 1.3 Interaction of RBX with BCAS and ATC 2 2.0 THE RBX OATA LINR 6 ./ 2.1 Signal Waveforms 6 2.2 Signal Content 6 2.3 Message Formts 7 3.0 RBX GROUND EQUIPMENT 10 3.1 Transmission Control 10 3.2 System Clock 10 3.3 Modulator/Transmitter 12 3.4 htenna System 12 3.5 Receiver 12 3.6 Interrogation Signal Processing 14 3.7 RBX Processor 14 3.7.1 Sensitivity Level Selection 14 3.7.2 ATC Communication Data Link Interface 16 3.7.3 ATC Remote Control Interface 17 3.8 Performance Monitoring 17 4.0 RBX PERFOMCE 18 4.1 Link Reliability 18 4.1.1 Link Power Budget 18 4.1.2 RBX Antenna Lobing 18 4.1.3 Aircraft Antenna Fading 18 4.1.4 Interference Effects 22 4.1.5 Net Link Reliability 25 .> REFERENCES 26 . iii —. ILLUSTRATIONS 1 Relationship of RBX to Elements of BCAS and ARTS 2 Sequence of Events and Information Transfer between RBX and BCAS 3 RBX Link Formats a 4 RBX Functional Block Diagram 11 5 Example of an RBX Front End 13 6 Side View of RBX Coverage Volume 15 7 Vertical Lobing..” .,:- 20 a Aircraft Antenna Summry Statistics 21 9 Probability of RBX 3-pulse Detection of a 24 Single BCAS Interrogation in the Presence of Noise Alone and Noise Plus Interference.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.108
    Federal Communications Commission § 80.108 once every 15 minutes during radio- § 80.104 Identification of radar trans- telephone communications. missions not authorized. (f) VHF public coast stations licensed This section applies to all maritime to serve a predetermined geographic radar transmitters except radar beacon service area are not required to provide stations. station identification under this sec- (a) Radar transmitters must not tion. A site-based VHF public coast transmit station identification. station may identify by means of the (b) [Reserved] approximate geographic location of the OPERATING PROCEDURES—LAND station or the area it serves when it is STATIONS the only VHF public coast station serv- ing the location or there will be no § 80.105 General obligations of coast conflict with the identification of any stations. other station. Each coast station or marine-utility [51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 station must acknowledge and receive FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, all calls directed to it by ship or air- 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004] craft stations. Such stations are per- mitted to transmit safety communica- § 80.103 Digital selective calling (DSC) tion to any ship or aircraft station. operating procedures. VHF (156–162 MHz) and AMTS (216–220 (a) Operating procedures for the use MHz) public coast stations may provide fixed or hybrid services on a co-pri- of DSC equipment in the maritime mo- mary basis with mobile operations. bile service are as contained in ITU–R M.541–9 (incorporated by reference, see [65 FR 77824, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 80.108
    Federal Communications Commission § 80.108 once every 15 minutes during radio- § 80.104 Identification of radar trans- telephone communications. missions not authorized. (f) VHF public coast stations licensed This section applies to all maritime to serve a predetermined geographic radar transmitters except radar beacon service area are not required to provide stations. station identification under this sec- (a) Radar transmitters must not tion. A site-based VHF public coast transmit station identification. station may identify by means of the (b) [Reserved] approximate geographic location of the OPERATING PROCEDURES—LAND station or the area it serves when it is STATIONS the only VHF public coast station serv- ing the location or there will be no § 80.105 General obligations of coast conflict with the identification of any stations. other station. Each coast station or marine-utility [51 FR 31213, Sept. 2, 1986, as amended at 52 station must acknowledge and receive FR 35244, Sept. 18, 1987; 68 FR 46961, Aug. 7, all calls directed to it by ship or air- 2003; 69 FR 64671, Nov. 8, 2004] craft stations. Such stations are per- mitted to transmit safety communica- § 80.103 Digital selective calling (DSC) tion to any ship or aircraft station. operating procedures. VHF (156–162 MHz) and AMTS (216–220 (a) Operating procedures for the use MHz) public coast stations may provide fixed or hybrid services on a co-pri- of DSC equipment in the maritime mo- mary basis with mobile operations. bile service are as contained in ITU–R M.541–9 (incorporated by reference, see [65 FR 77824, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Surveillance Phased Array Radar (SSPAR): Initial Feasibility Study
    Project Report ATC-416 Secondary Surveillance Phased Array Radar (SSPAR): Initial Feasibility Study M.E. Weber M.L. Wood J.R. Franz D. Conway J.Y.N. Cho 6 February 2014 Lincoln Laboratory MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. ATC-416 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date 6 February 2014 Secondary Surveillance Phased Array Radar (SSPAR): Initial Feasbility Study 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. M.E. Weber, M.L. Wood, J.R. Franz, D. Conway, and J.Y. N. Cho, ATC-416 MIT Lincoln Laboratory 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street 11. Contract or Grant No. Lexington, MA 02420-9108 FA8721-05-C-0002 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation Project Report Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20591 15. Supplementary Notes This report is based on studies performed at Lincoln Laboratory, a federally funded research and development center operated by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, under Air Force Contract FA8721-05-C-0002.
    [Show full text]