DOCSLIB.ORG

An East Kent Approach to Green Infrastructure and Recreation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An East Kent Approach to Green Infrastructure and Recreation Report An East Kent Approach to Green Infrastructure and Recreation With Particular Reference to ‘Natura 2000’ sites Phase 1 Report – Evidence Base Final Report April 2014 Authors Sharon Bayne BSc MSc MCIEEM Blackwood Bayne Ltd 8 Herts Crescent, Loose, Maidstone, Kent ME15 0AX www.blackwoodbayne.co.uk [email protected] 01622 746316 0 7761 067124 Registered in England number 8423224 Val Hyland BA Dip LA (Hons) PGCert. UD Val Hyland Consulting Silverthorn, Scotton Street, Wye, Kent [email protected] 01233 812195 07740 185381 Val Hyland CONSULTING Acknowledgements This study would not have been possible without the input and support from many people across the study area. The authors would like to thank the many people who contributed time, data and knowledge to this study. These include officers from the four local authorities, Nick Delaney, Ashley Hills, Tony Child, Jillian Barr, Adrian Verrell, Piran Cooper and David Ilsley, Debbie Salmon and Sue Young of the Kent Wildlife Trust, Angela Marlow, Jenny Bowen and Jo Dear of Natural England, Owen Leyshon of the Romney Marsh Countryside Partnership, Ruth Wood of Visit Kent, Rebecca Hoffman of Kent County Council. Suggested citation: S. Bayne and V. Hyland, An East Kent Approach to Green Infrastructure and Recreation (with particular reference to ‘Natura 2000’ sites), Phase 1 Report – Evidence Base, for Dover District Council 2013. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background to this Report .................................................................................................................................. 1 The East Kent suite of European Sites .............................................................................................................. 3 Planning in East Kent ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Visitors and Recreation ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Background to this Report ................................................................................................................................ 12 Aims, Scope and Limitations .............................................................................................................................. 12 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Section 1: Background ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Habitats Regulations 2010 and Planning Policy .................................................................................................. 15 Habitats Regulations 2010 .................................................................................................................................. 15 National Planning Policy Framework and Duty to Cooperate in the Planning of Sustainable Development ......................................................................................................................................................... 18 Comparator Areas ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Thames Basin Heaths .......................................................................................................................................... 20 The Solent .............................................................................................................................................................. 20 North Kent ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 Pagham Harbour ................................................................................................................................................... 23 Mitigation .................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 Principles of Mitigation ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Strategic Mitigation .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Potential Components of Mitigation ............................................................................................................... 28 Development Contributions ............................................................................................................................. 31 East Kent – Current Approaches ..................................................................................................................... 33 Section 2: East Kent ................................................................................................................................................. 36 Natura 2000 Sites in East Kent ............................................................................................................................. 37 Summary of Sites and Features ......................................................................................................................... 37 Sources of Information ....................................................................................................................................... 40 Thanet Coast Suite .............................................................................................................................................. 42 The Swale ............................................................................................................................................................... 46 Dungeness .............................................................................................................................................................. 48 Dover to Kingsdown Cliffs SAC ....................................................................................................................... 52 Lydden and Temple Ewell SAC ......................................................................................................................... 54 Folkestone to Etchinghill Escarpment SAC .................................................................................................... 56 Blean Complex SAC ............................................................................................................................................ 58 Parkgate Down SAC ........................................................................................................................................... 60 Stodmarsh SPA, SAC, Ramsar........................................................................................................................... 61 East Kent – Planning and Development .............................................................................................................. 62 Core Strategies, Local Plans and Development ............................................................................................ 62 Strategic Overview of Development in East Kent ....................................................................................... 62 Visitors and Recreation in East Kent ................................................................................................................... 74 Current Recreational Use .................................................................................................................................. 74 Current Access Provision .................................................................................................................................. 74 Information on Visitors ....................................................................................................................................... 76 Links with Tourism .............................................................................................................................................. 82 Section 3: Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 83 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................................... 84 The Natura 2000 Sites ........................................................................................................................................ 86 Joint Working and Strategic Approaches
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dave Brown by Dave Brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT
    Dave Brown by dave brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT Saturday 8th May 2010. One look out of the window told me today was not the day for butterflies or dragonflies. A phone call from a friend then had us heading to my favourite place. Good old Dungeness. Scenery not the best in the world but the wildlife exceeedingly good. Thirty minutes later we were watching a Whiskered Tern hawking insects over the New Diggings, showing from the road to Lydd. Also present were a few hundred Swifts, Swallows, House and Sand Martins, together with a few Common Terns. A quick chat with Dave Walker (very friendly Observatory Warden) and his equally friendly assistant confirmed that the recent weather there meant little or no Butterfly or moth activity. With the rain falling harder it was time to leave Dunge and head inland. The Iberian Chifchaf at Waderslade had already been present over a week so it was time to catch up with it. On arrival at the small wood of Chesnut Avenue the bird showed and sang within a few minutes of our arrival. This is still a scarce bird in Britain so where was the crowd. In 30 minutes the maximum crowd was five, and that included 3 from our family. It sang for long periods of time and only once did it mutter the usual Chifchaf call, otherwise it was Iberian Chifchaf all the way. It also look slighlty diferent in structure and colour. To my eyes the upper parts were greener, the legs were a brown colour and the tail appeared longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Sheppey Road Crossing: Come Ashore on the Mainland Side and Leysdown Walk Craft Sideways Under the Harty Ferry Road Sheppey Crossing Inner Span of Bridge
    Garrison Point INFO KEY The point at which the Swale, the Medway and Thames Club phone 01795 663052 Hazard Estuary tides meet giving rise IOS Round the Island Race to a tidal back eddy. The Cheyney Rock The course is a clockwise circumnavigation of the island, High water 14.35 BST @ 5.87m Recovery point cardinal buoy marks a disused IOS Sailing Club race• • • outfall & posts (keep outside). 'L' shaped area of sand stones starting and finishing at IOS Sailing Club. Low water 08.28 BST @ 0.85m Please note: the Club cannot be held and rocks that dries several responsible for recovering boats retiring at feet high at low water. these points. Any boat that does retire must Start times & class flags phone the clubhouse on 01795 663052. West Cant 10.30 Monohulls PY1120 and over / Sailboards Grain Hard Event car parking Isle of Outfall Start line 11.00 Monohulls PY1031 to 1119 inc. Tripod Post Grain Mid Cant 11.30 Monohulls PY1030 & under Spectator point 12.00 Multihulls Port of Mean low water Finish line Sheerness Minster boom Starboard nav. buoy Marine Parade A wartime submarine trap Greyed area = mean low water Catamaran YC consisting of a line of Spile CYC Compound submerged barges and Port navigation buoy Sheerness wooden posts. Cardinal mark North Kent QB Dolphins Advised route by road to South Kent Marks of old pier remain River Medway at Queenborough. the sailing club on race day The Broadway Minster Queenborough Spit Bosun’s Store A small chandlery B2008 A250 Shallow water S1 B2007 Barton Hill Dr Large sand bank from S2 Leysdown to Shellness - risk of grounding.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2011) Kent Minerals and Waste Development Framework
    Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Kent Minerals And Waste Development Framework Mineral Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (November 2011) 1 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Produced by : Planning and Environment Environment and Enterprise Kent County Council Invicta House Tel: 01622 221610 County Hall Email: [email protected] Maidstone Web: www.kent.gov.uk/mwdf Kent ME14 1XX 2 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Contents Page 1 Abbreviations 4 2 Introduction 5 3 Site Proposals 7 4 Responses for Mineral Sites DPD 9 5 Soft Sand Sites for Consideration 11 6 Sharp Sand and Gravel Sites for Consideration 33 7 Crushed Rock Sites for Consideration 53 8 Silica Sand Sites for Consideration 57 9 Chalk Sites for Consideration 61 10 Brickearth Sites for Consideration 67 11 Clay Sites for Consideration 71 12 Mineral Import Sites for Consideration 73 13 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates Sites for Consideration 75 14 Glossary 101 3 Kent County Council—Mineral Sites Options Commentary Report (May 2011) Abbreviations AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty MGB Metropolitan Green Belt AQMA Air Quality Management Area MOD Ministry of Defence BAP Biodiversity Action Plan NNR National Nature Reserve BOA Biodiversity Opportunity Area PINS Planning Inspectorate CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England PPS Planning Policy Statement DPD Development Plan Documents PROW Public Right of Way SA Sustainability Appraisal
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Environment & Transport Cabinet Committee, 08
    ENVIRONMENT & TRANSPORT CABINET COMMITTEE Wednesday, 8th September, 2021 10.00 am Online AGENDA ENVIRONMENT & TRANSPORT CABINET COMMITTEE Wednesday, 8 September 2021 at 10.00 am Ask for: Matthew Dentten Online Telephone: 03000 414534 Membership (16) Conservative (12): Mr S Holden (Chairman), Mr R Love, OBE (Vice-Chairman), Mr N Baker, Mr C Beart, Mr T Bond, Mr N Collor, Mr D Crow- Brown, Mr M Dendor, Mr A Hills, Mrs S Hudson, Mrs L Parfitt- Reid and Mr D Watkins Labour (2): Ms M Dawkins, Mr B Lewis Liberal Democrat (1): Mr I Chittenden Green and Mr M Baldock Independents (1): UNRESTRICTED ITEMS (During these items the meeting is likely to be open to the public) 1 Introduction/Webcast announcement 2 Apologies and Substitutes To receive apologies for absence and notification of any substitutes present. 3 Declarations of Interest by Members in items on the Agenda To receive any declarations of interest made by Members in relation to any matter on the agenda. Members are reminded to specify the agenda item number to which it refers and the nature of the interest being declared. 4 Minutes of the meeting held on 29 June 2021 (Pages 1 - 10) To consider and approve the minutes as a correct record. 5 Verbal Updates by Cabinet Members and Corporate Director 6 21/00073 - Kent Minerals and Waste Local Plan 2013-30 - 5 Year Review of 2016 adopted Plan (Pages 11 - 186) 7 Approach to monitoring Net Zero Target (Pages 187 - 192) 8 Kent and Medway Energy and Low Emissions Strategy - Progress Update (Pages 193 - 202) 9 Heritage Conservation Strategy (Pages
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRYSIDE Page 1 of 16
    Page 1 of 16 COUNTRYSIDE Introduction 12.1 Shepway has a rich and diverse landscape ranging from the rolling chalk downland and dry valleys of the North Downs, through the scarp and dip slope of the Old Romney Shoreline, to Romney Marsh and the unique shingle feature of the Dungeness peninsula. This diversity is reflected in the range of Natural Areas and Countryside Character Areas, identified by English Nature and the Countryside Agency respectively, which cover the District. The particular landscape and wildlife value of large parts of the District is also recognised through protective countryside designations, including Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Heritage Coastline, as well as the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The countryside also plays host to a wide range of activities and it is recognised that the health of the rural economy and the health of the countryside are inter-linked. A function of the Local Plan is to achieve a sustainable pattern of development in the countryside. This involves a balance between the needs of rural land users and maintaining and enhancing countryside character and quality. 12.2 This balance is achieved in two main ways:- a. By focussing most development in urban areas, particularly on previously developed sites and ensuring that sufficient land is allocated to meet identified development requirements, thus reducing uncertainty and speculation on ‘greenfield’ sites in the countryside. b. By making firm policy statements relating to: the general principles to be applied to all proposals in the countryside; specific types of development in the countryside; and the protection of particularly important areas.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Page
    CONTENTS Page Contents 1 Introduction 2 About Us 3 The Neighbourhood Plan Area 7 A Vision for Boughton and Dunkirk Parishes in 2031 8 Plan Development Process 9 Neighbourhood Plan Objectives 11 Planning Policy Context 12 Housing 16 Traffic and Transport 23 Business and Employment 29 Community Well-Being 31 Environment, Green Infrastructure and Design Quality 38 Evidence Base Overview 46 Letter of Designation 47 1 Introduction The task of a Neighbourhood Plan is to set out the development principles and allocation of areas for future building and land use in its area, reflecting the Government's determination to ensure that local communities are closely involved in the decisions that affect them. This Neighbourhood Plan is submitted by the parish councils of Boughton-under-Blean and Dunkirk, in Kent, both being qualifying bodies as defined by the Localism Act 2011. The parishes were designated as a Neighbourhood Area under the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012, Part 2, and Section 6 by Swale Borough Council on 19th September 2013. Strategically, the message of this Plan is that both the villages feel they are under siege. The pressure comes from two directions – increased traffic and proposed housing developments. Traffic: We sit at the head of the bottleneck leading to the Channel ports; Brenley Corner is among the nation’s blackest of black spots and, given the increasing demands of heavy goods vehicles travelling between the continent and the UK, the pressure on the through roads and country lanes and lay-bys, can only get worse. The quality of the air we breathe will also be affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report
    EB 08.20 Shepway Local Development Framework Green Infrastructure Report Elham Park Wood Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 1 Contents 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 2. Components of GI 3. Functions and benefits of GI 4. GI policy context 5. The GI resource in Shepway 6. Biodiversity GI in Shepway 7. Linear Feature GI 8. Civic Amenity GI 9. Key issues and opportunities in relation to strategic development sites Shepway Green Infrastructure Report July 2011 2 1. Green Infrastructure - definitions 1.1 A number of definitions of Green Infrastructure (GI) are in use including:- PPS12 – “…a network of multi-functional green space, both new and existing, both rural and urban, which supports the natural and ecological processes and is integral to the health and quality of life of sustainable communities.” 1.2 South East Plan/South East GI Partnership – “For the purposes of spatial planning the term green infrastructure (GI) relates to the active planning and management of sub-regional networks of multi-functional open space. These networks should be managed and designed to support biodiversity and wider quality of life, particularly in areas undergoing large scale change.“ 1.3 Natural England – “Green Infrastructure (GI) is a strategically planned and delivered network of high quality green spaces and other environmental features. It should be designed and managed as a multifunctional resource capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities. Green Infrastructure includes parks, open spaces, playing fields, woodlands, allotments and private gardens.” 1.4 The common features of these definitions are that GI:- • involves natural and managed green areas in urban and rural settings • is about the strategic connection of open green areas • should provide multiple benefits for people 2.
    [Show full text]
  • District Water Cycle Study 1
    Consultation Draft 1 Prepared by James Hammond, Strategic Policy Officer Reviewed by Adrian Tofts, Planning Policy Manager Agreed by Folkestone and Hythe Water Cycle Report This report has been produced by the District Council, and the approach taken has been to build upon and update the 2011 Water Cycle Study. The report has been shared with key stakeholders for comment/feedback, notably the Environment Agency, Affinity Water, South East Water and Southern Water. Information specifically relating to flood risk has been sourced from the 2015 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment prepared by Herrington Consulting to update the 2009 study. The Water Cycle Report is produced to inform the District’s Local Plan documents and is not considered material to any planning application. 2 CONTENTS SECTION A INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 AIMS & SCOPE OF THE REPORT Chapter 2 AN OVERVIEW OF WATER SYSTEMS & LOCAL FEATURES Chapter 3 SPATIAL PLANNING CONTEXT SECTION B EVALUATION Chapter 4 WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE Chapter 5 WATER RESOURCES & WASTE WATER TREAMENT Chapter 6 FLOODING & COASTAL ISSUES SECTION C FINDINGS Chapter 7 CONCLUSIONS List of Diagrams Figure ref Page Figure title number Figure 1.1 10 The Water Cycle approach Figure 1.2 15 Folkestone and Hythe District and its context within Kent Figure 1.3 16 The principal rivers and existing defence infrastructure within Folkestone and Hythe District Figure 1.4 18 Flooding sources Figure 2.1 22 The Hydrological Cycle Figure 2.2 25 A linear summary of the Royal Military Canal Figure 4.1 37 Water Framework Directive
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the South-East IAP Report Here
    Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in the Environment Agency Southern Region Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs and Mike Athanson Report prepared by: Report produced for: Pond Conservation Environment Agency c/o Oxford Brookes University Southern Regional Office Gipsy Lane, Headington Guildbourne House Oxford, OX3 0BP Chatsworth Road, Worthing Sussex, BN11 1LD Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who took time to send pond data and pictures or other information for this assessment. In particular: Adam Fulton, Alex Lockton, Alice Hiley, Alison Cross, Alistair Kirk, Amanda Bassett, Andrew Lawson, Anne Marston, Becky Collybeer, Beth Newman, Bradley Jamieson, Catherine Fuller, Chris Catling, Daniel Piec, David Holyoak, David Rumble, Debbie Miller, Debbie Tann, Dominic Price, Dorothy Wright, Ed Jarzembowski, Garf Williams, Garth Foster, Georgina Terry, Guy Hagg, Hannah Cook, Henri Brocklebank, Ian Boyd, Jackie Kelly, Jane Frostick, Jay Doyle, Jo Thornton, Joe Stevens, John Durnell, Jonty Denton, Katharine Parkes, Kevin Walker, Kirsten Wright, Laurie Jackson, Lee Brady, Lizzy Peat, Martin Rand, Mary Campling, Matt Shardlow, Mike Phillips, Naomi Ewald, Natalie Rogers, Nic Ferriday, Nick Stewart, Nicky Court, Nicola Barnfather, Oli Grafton, Pauline Morrow, Penny Green, Pete Thompson, Phil Buckley, Philip Sansum, Rachael Hunter, Richard Grogan, Richard Moyse, Richard Osmond, Rufus Sage, Russell Wright, Sarah Jane Chimbwandira, Sheila Brooke, Simon Weymouth, Steph Ames, Terry Langford, Tom Butterworth, Tom Reid, Vicky Kindemba. Cover photograph: Low Weald Pond, Lee Brady Report production: February 2009 Consultation: March 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat and play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. However, they are vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment / Habitats Regulations Assessment
    Appropriate assessment / Habitats Regulations Assessment Riki Therivel, Levett-Therivel • What is AA/HRA? • Four steps in HRA – Screening – Appropriate assessment – Alternatives, IROPI, compensatory measures • UK examples • ‘People Over Wind’ WHAT IS AA / HRA? Slavonian Grebe North Atlantic wet heaths European dry heaths Avocet Southern damselfly • Tests impact of project or plan on SPAs/SACs • Concludes with yes/no statement: will project or plan have significant impact on European site? • It is very precautionary Required by European Habitats Directive AA of projects carried out for about 15 years European Court of Justice ruling Oct. 2005: UK has not implemented Habitats Directive Articles 6.3 and 6.4 correctly re. plans Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 transposes requirements into UK law 6.3 Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site's conservation objectives... the competent national authorities shall agree to the plan or project only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned.. 6.3 Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in viewa European of the ‘site’ site's is an SPA conservation objectives..
    [Show full text]
  • 7.4 Strategic Options Report
    DOCUMENT 7.4 Strategic Options Report National Grid (Richborough Connection Project) Order Regulation 5(2)(q) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 and TEN-E Regulation EU347/2013 First published June 2013 Application Ref: EN020017 January 2016 Richborough Connection Project Strategic Options Report for the South East Region June 2013 Issue 1 National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 2 Background................................................................................................ 7 3 Summary of the Need Case.........................................................................11 4 New Transmission Routes - National Grid’s Approach......................................14 5 Potential Strategic Options Identified for the Richborough Connection ..............20 6 Appraisal of Strategic Option 1 – Richborough to Canterbury North (onshore) ...27 7 Appraisal of Strategic Option 2 – Richborough to Cleve Hill (onshore)...............37 8 Appraisal of Strategic Option 3 – Richborough to Kemsley (onshore) ................48 9 Appraisal of Strategic Option 4 – Richborough to Cleve Hill (offshore)...............59 10 Appraisal of Strategic Option 5 – Richborough to Sellindge (offshore) ...........64 11 Appraisal of Strategic Option 6 – Richborough to Kemsley (offshore) ............70 12 Conclusions ...........................................................................................75
    [Show full text]