Report of Interconnection Agreements
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Level 3 Communications, LLC Contract Number: GS-35F-0177J
Authorized Federal Acquisition Service Information Technology Schedule Pricelist General Purpose Commercial Information Technology Equipment, Software and Services General Description of the Commodities and Services Offered Services include Managed Internet Access and Value Added Network Services supporting Electronic Commerce applications for Government agencies. Application SIN, DESCRIPTION, FSC Classes and FPDS Codes SIN DESCRIPTION FSC CLASS/FPDS CODE SIN 132-51 Information Technology - Professional Services SIN 132-52 Electronic Commerce Services D304 Value Added Network Services SIN 132-52 Electronic Commerce Services D304 Internet Access Services Note 1: All non-professional labor categories must be incidental to and used solely to support hardware, software and/or professional services, and cannot be purchased separately. Note 2: Offerors and Agencies are advised that the Group 70 – Information Technology Schedule is not to be used as a means to procure services which properly fall under the Brooks Act. These services include, but are not limited to, architectural, engineering, mapping, cartographic production, remote sensing, geographic information systems, and related services. FAR 36.6 distinguishes between mapping services of an A/E nature and mapping services which are not connected nor incidental to the traditionally accepted A/E Services. Note 3: This solicitation is not intended to solicit for the reselling of IT Professional Services, except for the provision of implementation, maintenance, integration, or training services in direct support of a product. Under such circumstances the services must be performance by the publisher or manufacturer or one of their authorized agents. NOTE: Electronic Commerce Services are not intended to supersede or be a substitute for any voice requirements of FTS2001. -
Federal Communications Commission DA 17-432 Before the Federal
Federal Communications Commission DA 17-432 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Joint Application of Consolidated Communications ) WC Docket No. 16-417 Holdings, Inc., and FairPoint Communications, ) Inc., to Transfer Indirect Control of Authorization ) Holders to Consolidated Communications ) Holdings, Inc. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: May 8, 2017 Released: May 8, 2017 By the Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau; Acting Chief, International Bureau; and Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (Consolidated Holdings) and FairPoint Communications, Inc. (FairPoint) (collectively, Applicants), filed a series of applications pursuant to Sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act),1 seeking approval for various assignments and the transfer of control of licenses and authorizations held by FairPoint to Consolidated Holdings.2 We find that approval of the transaction will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity and hereby grant the Applications. In addition, we find that the Applicants have demonstrated good cause for receipt of their requested waiver of Section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission’s rules.3 2. A public notice accepting the Applications for filing and establishing a pleading cycle for public comments was released on January 12, 2017.4 The Commission received no petitions to deny or comments in opposition to grant of the Applications. On March 22, 2017, after the public comment period closed, Applicants filed additional information to supplement the Applications.5 1 47 U.S.C. §§ 214, 310(d). 2 See Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and FairPoint Communications, Inc. -
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 19, 2016 Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 0-9881 54-1162807 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 500 Shentel Way P.O. Box 459 Edinburg, VA 22824 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (540) 984-4141 Not applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2-(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 5.07 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. (a) On April 19, 2016, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company held its annual shareholder meeting. At the meeting, the directors set forth below were appointed to three year terms, and two proposals, one to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016, and the second to approve named executive officer compensation, were approved by shareholders voting by proxy or in person. -
Case Closed, Vol. 27 Ebook Free Download
CASE CLOSED, VOL. 27 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Gosho Aoyama | 184 pages | 29 Oct 2009 | Viz Media, Subs. of Shogakukan Inc | 9781421516790 | English | San Francisco, United States Case Closed, Vol. 27 PDF Book January 20, [22] Ai Haibara. Views Read Edit View history. Until Jimmy can find a cure for his miniature malady, he takes on the pseudonym Conan Edogawa and continues to solve all the cases that come his way. The Junior Detective League and Dr. Retrieved November 13, January 17, [8]. Product Details. They must solve the mystery of the manor before they are all killed off or kill each other. They talk about how Shinichi's absence has been filled with Dr. Chicago 7. April 10, [18] Rachel calls Richard to get involved. Rachel thinks it could be the ghost of the woman's clock tower mechanic who died four years prior. Conan's deductions impress Jodie who looks at him with great interest. Categories : Case Closed chapter lists. And they could have thought Shimizu was proposing a cigarette to Bito. An unknown person steals the police's investigation records relating to Richard Moore, and Conan is worried it could be the Black Organization. The Junior Detectives find the missing boy and reconstruct the diary pages revealing the kidnapping motive and what happened to the kidnapper. The Junior Detectives meet an elderly man who seems to have a lot on his schedule, but is actually planning on committing suicide. Magic Kaito Episodes. Anime News Network. Later, a kid who is known to be an obsessive liar tells the Detective Boys his home has been invaded but is taken away by his parents. -
The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J
Hastings Law Journal Volume 50 | Issue 6 Article 5 1-1999 The aM gnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout Jim Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jim Chen, The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J. 1503 (1999). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol50/iss6/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout by JIM CHEN* Table of Contents I. High N oon .................................................................................. 1504 II. The Gunslingers, Then and Now ...................... 1506 A. The Opening Round ........................................................... 1507 B. The Magnificent Seven ...................................................... 1511 (1) POTS and PANS, Hedgehogs and Foxes ................... 1511 (2) Lord Low Everything Else ................. 1513 III. The Legal Mothers of Merger Mania ...................................... 1514 A. Statutory Starters .............. ............ 1515 (1) Section 251 and Allied Provisions ............................... 1516 (2) Section 271: BOC Entry into InterLATA Carriage .1519 * Professor of Law and Vance K. Opperman Research -
SC01-2050 Level 3 Communications Vs
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC01-2050 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Appellant, v. E. LEON JACOBS, JR., et al. Appellees. AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF OF LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC Michael R. Romano, Esq. Kenneth A. Hoffman, Esq. Greg L. Rogers, Esq. Florida Bar No. 307718 Level 3 Communications, LLC Martin P. McDonnell, Esq. 1025 Eldorado Boulevard Florida Bar No. 301728 Broomfield, Colorado 80021 Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell & (720) 888-7015 (Telephone) Hoffman, P.A. (720) 888-5134 (Telecopier) P. O. Box 551 Tallahassee, Florida 323302 (850) 681-6788 (Telephone) (850) 681-6515 (Telecopier) Attorneys for Level 3 Communications, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CITATIONS ........................................iii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS ......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................... 12 ARGUMENT ................................................ 16 I. The Standard of Review ............................... 16 II. The Commission Exceeded its Statutory Authority by Imposing Regulatory Assessment Fees on Level 3’s Collocation Revenues ................................. 18 A. Section 350.113(3), Florida Statutes, limits the imposition of regulatory assessment fees to revenues derived from regulated services. .............. 18 B. The Commission erroneously failed to consider the entire statutory scheme in determining that revenues collected from Level 3's collocation agreements constitute “intrastate business” subject to regulatory assessment fees ................................. 26 C. In 1995, the Legislature -
Protoculture Addicts
PA #88 // CONTENTS PA A N I M E N E W S N E T W O R K ' S ANIME VOICES 4 Letter From The Publisher PROTOCULTURE¯:paKu]-PROTOCULTURE ADDICTS 5 Page 5 Editorial Issue #88 (Summer 2006) 6 Contributors Spotlight SPOTLIGHTS 98 Letters 25 BASILISK NEWS Overview Character Profiles 8 Anime Releases (R1 DVDs) Story Primer 10 Related Products Releases Shinobi: The live-action movie 12 Manga Releases By Miyako Matsuda & C.J. Pelletier 17 Anime & Manga News 32 URUSEI YATSURA An interview with Robert Woodhead MANGA PREVIEW An Introduction By Zac Bertschy & Therron Martin 53 ES: Eternal Sabbath 35 VIZ MEDIA ANIME WORLD An interview with Alvin Lu By Zac Bertschy 73 Convention Guide 78 Interview ANIME STORIES Hitoshi Ariga 80 Making The Band 55 BEWITCHED AGNES 10 Tips from Full Moon on Becoming a Popstar Okusama Wa Maho Shoujo 82 Fantasia Genre Film Festival By Miyako Matsuda & C.J. Pelletier Sample fileKamikaze Girls 58 BLOOD + The Taste Of Tea By Miyako Matsuda & C. Macdonald 84 The Modern Japanese Music Database Part 35: Home Page 19: Triceratops 60 ELEMENTAL GELADE By Miyako Matsuda REVIEWS 63 GALLERY FAKE 86 Books Howl’s Moving Castle Novel By Miyako Matsuda & C.J. Pelletier Le Guide Phénix Du Manga 65 GUN SWORD Love Hina, Novel Vol. 1 By Miyako Matsuda & C.J. Pelletier 87 Live-Action Lorelei 67 KAMICHU! 88 Manga Kamisama Wa Chugakusei 90 Related Products By Miyako Matsuda CD Soundtracks 69 TIDELINE BLUE Otaku Unite! By Miyako Matsuda & C.J. Pelletier 91 Anime More on: www.protoculture-mag.com & www.animenewsnetwork.com 3 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ LETTER FROM THE PUBLISHER A N I M E N E W S N E T W O R K ' S PROTOCULTUREPROTOCULTURE¯:paKu]- ADDICTS Over seven years of writing and editing anime reviews, I’ve put a lot of thought into what a Issue #88 (Summer 2006) review should be and should do, as well as what is shouldn’t be and shouldn’t do. -
Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65
4 FCC Red No. 3 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65 3. On the basis of the statements contained in the Before the parties' joint motion, we conclude that there are no long Federal Communications Commission er issues in controversy and the proceedings should be Washington, D.C. 20554 terminated. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to author ity delegated in Section 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, In the Matter of 47 C.F.R. § 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by AT&T and Centel IS GRANTED. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-cap Complainant, tioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and these proceedings ARE HEREBY TERMINATED. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CENTRAL TELEPHONE File Nos. E-88-67 COMPANY OF TEXAS, CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-68 Gregory J. Vogt COMPANY OF OHIO, Chief, Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-69 COMPANY - MINNESOTA and CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-70 COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendants. ORDER Adopted: January 23, 1989; Released: February 2, 1989 By the Chief, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. We have before us a joint motion filed December 28, 1988 by AT&T Communications (AT&T) and Central Telephone Company of Texas, Central Telephone Com pany of Ohio, Central Telephone Company - Minnesota and Central Telephone Company of Illinois (collectively "Centel"), requesting that we dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned complaint proceedings and approve the parties' settlement agreement. 2. These proceedings were initiated by formal com plaints filed by AT&T against Centel on April 22, 1988 alleging that the defendants' earnings for interstate access services for the period October 1, 1985 through Decem ber 31, 1986, exceeded the rate of return authorized by the Commission in Authorized Rates of Return for Inter state Services for AT & T and Exchange Telephone Car riers, CC Docket No. -
Funding for the Telecommunications Relay
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: FUNDING FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ) CASE NO. RELAY SERVICE ) 2017 -00358 ORDER On September 14, 2017, the Commission issued an Order in this proceeding requiring that the Telecommunications Relay Service ("TRS") fund surcharge be reduced by one cent ($0.01) to one cent ($0.01) per month effective January 1, 2018. In addition, the Commission established a deadline to receive comments regarding a frequency schedule for the Commission to review the TRS fund and related surcharge in the future. The Commission received no comments. The Commission finds that it will conduct a formal review of the TRS fund and the surcharge on an annual basis. Annual reviews of the TRS fund should reduce the potential for large balance shortfalls and overages. Annual reviews will commence approximately 120 days from the end of the calendar year, with the goal of implementing any changes on the first day of the following calendar year. The goal would also be to issue an order within 60 days of the initiation of the annual review so that providers will have ample time to implement any changes, if ordered. These annual formal reviews would be in addition to ongoing monitoring and would not prevent the Commission from making any changes in the interim period. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. The Commission annually will conduct a fo rmal review of the TRS fund to determine if a change in the surcharge is warranted. 2. This case is closed and removed from the Commission's docket. -
Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc
Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc. AmeriVision Communications, Inc. dba Affinity 4 and Lifeline Communications Airnex Communications, Inc. Allvoi Americatel Corporation ANPI Business, LLC fka Zone Telecom, LLC AT Conference, Inc. AT&T Corp. BA Telecom, Inc. BBG Communications, Inc. Billing Concepts, Inc. (Refered us to AT&T as provider) Birch Telcom of the West Inc. dba Birch Communications BullsEye Telecom Cbeyond Communications LLC Century Link Communications Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Consumer Cellular Convergia Cox California Telecom, LLC Cricket Communications, Inc./AT&T Mobility Earthlink Business, LLC ‐ Earthlink, LLC ‐ Earthlink, Inc. Enhanced Communications Network INC. E. / Everything Wireless First Communications Flash Wireless Globalstar USA LLC Granite Telecommunications LLC GreatCall, Inc. dba Jitterbug IBM Global Network Systems IDT Domestic Telecom inContact, Inc. Intellicall Operator Services Intelafone LLC Intermedia Voice Services I‐Wireless LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. Level 3 Communications LightYear Network Solutions Lingo, Inc Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Matrix Telecom, Inc. Mitel Net Solutions Page 1 of 2 Telecommunication Provider MCI Communications Services, Inc. Mpower Communications Corp. Network Innovations New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC NTT Docomo USA Nextel of California nexVortex, Inc. Nobel Tel, LLC OnStar LLC Ooma, Inc. Opex Communications, Inc. Pacific Bell Telephone Company PAETEC Communications Payment One Corp Phone.com, Inc. Pioneer Telephone PNG Telecommunications, Inc. Primus Telecommunications Ready Wireless SBC Long Distance, LLC Securus Technologies, Inc. Sonic Telecom, LLC Sprint Communications Company, L.P. Sprint Nextel/Spectrum Sprint Telephony PCS, LP Talk America, Inc. Telscape Communications, Inc. TING Globalinx Enterprise, Inc. fka Tri‐M Communications, Inc. T‐Mobile West LLC Metro PCS California, LLC Total Call International, Inc. -
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy Cable Television Division
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ENERGY CABLE TELEVISION DIVISION MediaOne of Massachusetts, Inc., MediaOne Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp., Appellants, v. CTV 99-2 Board of Selectmen of the Town of North Andover, Appellee. OPPOSITION OF TOWN OF NORTH ANDOVER TO MOTION FOR EXPEDITED PROCESSING OF APPEAL The Town of North Andover ("North Andover") opposes the motion of MediaOne of Massachusetts, Inc, MediaOne Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. (collectively, “Appellants”) to expedite the hearing or processing of this matter. For the reasons set forth below, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunication and Energy, Cable Television Division (the "Division"), should deny the Appellants’ motion to expedite this proceeding and should schedule this matter for a full evidentiary hearing, giving appropriate consideration to the complex legal and factual matters at issue in the case. I. Introduction North Andover has moved that the Division consolidate any and all hearings with respect to the review of decisions by North Andover (CTV 99-2), Cambridge (CTV 99-4), Quincy (CTV 99-3) and Somerville (CTV 99-5) to deny or to conditionally approve the transfer of cable licenses from MediaOne Group, Inc. ("MediaOne") to AT&T Corp. ("AT&T") pursuant to M.G.L. c. 166A §7 and applicable regulations. Each of the decisions has as a common requirement that AT&T provide open or nondiscriminatory access to cable broadband for Internet and on-line services. The open access requirement, which preserves consumer choice and preserves competition among Internet and on-line service providers, should be reviewed by the Division in a consolidated evidentiary hearing that will allow for a complete and efficient presentation of this critical public policy question. -
Telephone-Pa. P.U.C. No. 9 Verizon North LLC. 1St Revised Preface
Telephone-Pa. P.U.C. No. 9 Verizon North LLC. 1st Revised Preface Sheet (C) Canceling Original Preface Sheet VERIZON NORTH LLC (C) GOVERNING SCHEDULE FOR FACILITIES FOR INTRASTATE ACCESS Governed by Tariffs Pa. P.U.C. Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 6 (Local General Tariff Governing Schedules) Verizon North LLC has adopted all of the effective tariffs of Verizon North Retain Co. All (C) references throughout this Tariff to Verizon North Retain Co., Verizon North Inc., GTE of (C) Pennsylvania Inc., Contel of Pennsylvania Inc., Continental Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, GTE North Incorporated, General Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, GTE MTO Inc. Quaker State Telephone Company, “the Telephone Company” or “the Company” shall be read as Verizon North LLC. (C) ________________________ Issued: December 16, 2010 Effective: December 17, 2010 Telephone-Pa. P.U.C. No. 9 Verizon North LLC Second Revised Sheet 2A Canceling First Revised Sheet 2A FACILITIES FOR INTRASTATE ACCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS ALPHABETICAL LISTING Section Advanced Communications Networks 16 Application of Tariff 1 Carrier Common Line Service 12 End User Access Service 13 Exceptions to FIA Offerings 14 Expanded Interconnection Services (EIS) 17 General Regulations 2 Market Areas and Mileage Calculation Methodology 15 Miscellaneous Services 8 Ordering Options for FIA 3 Rate Zone Wire Centers 18 (C) (Reserved for Future Use) 6 Special Access 5 Special Access (Former Contel Territory) 5A Special Construction 10 Special Facilities Routing of FIA 9 Special Federal Government FIA 11 Specialized FIA or Arrangements 7 Switched Access 4 (C) Indicates Change _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Issued: July 30, 2012 Effective: August 30, 2012 Telephone-Pa.