Thesis Full Draft Submission Copy (Revised)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thesis Full Draft Submission Copy (Revised) Suffering in Ancient Worldview: A Comparative Study of Acts, Fourth Maccabees, and Seneca A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Brian Jordan Tabb Middlesex University Supervised at London School of Theology September 2013 Abstract Brian J. Tabb, “Suffering in Ancient Worldview: A Comparative Study of Acts, Fourth Maccabees, and Seneca.” PhD thesis, London School of Theology/ Middlesex University, July 2013. This thesis analyzes how suffering functions in the worldviews of the Roman Stoic Seneca, the Jewish author of 4 Maccabees, and the Christian historian Luke. Acts 17:17–18 invites such a comparison by presenting Paul’s Christian missionary activity in direct engagement with Hellenistic Judaism and popular Greco-Roman philosophy, including Stoicism. Chapters 1, 3, and 5 offer close readings of representative texts from Acts, 4 Maccabees, and Seneca’s essays and letters with a view to highlighting the authors’ treatments of suffering. Chapters 2, 4, and 6 utilize heuristic worldview questions to clarify and synthesize how each writer accounts for suffering, vis-à-vis their perspectives on God, humanity, the world’s problem and its solution, and the future. Chapter 7 presents an ancient conversation between these three authors modeled after Cicero’s De Natura Deorum. This thesis makes at least three significant contributions to scholarship. First, this is the only extended comparison of Seneca, Luke, and 4 Maccabees. The value and importance of studying early Christianity alongside Stoicism and Hellenistic Judaism is well known, but previous studies have focused on Paul, not Luke, who is typically compared with Josephus, not 4 Maccabees. Second, building on N. T. Wright’s work, this study demonstrates that worldview questions offer a fruitful method for comparing different authors and groups. This study does not attempt to prove literary or intellectual dependence but to compare these authors at the worldview level. Third, this thesis contributes to the important and often neglected theme of suffering in Luke-Acts, 4 Maccabees, and Seneca’s writings. This is the first systematic treatment of suffering in Seneca’s thought and in 4 Maccabees. This study builds on Cunningham’s and Mittelstadt’s recent monographs on suffering in Luke- Acts and advances the discussion by offering clear definitions of suffering and persecution, illustrated by first-century examples, and by an extended worldview comparison of Luke with other authors. In Luke-Acts, God is not “outside suffering” as Seneca argues but acts through the suffering of Jesus and his followers to set the world of sin and suffering right again, in fulfillment of his ancient promises. ii Acknowledgments “I stand to this day, having experienced help from God” (Acts 26:22). It is a tremendous privilege and a daunting task to complete a PhD thesis, which would not have been possible without the remarkable faithfulness of God and the constant support and prayers of many people. I am particularly grateful to my supervisor Prof. Steve Walton. He has been a wise, attentive, and encouraging supervisor, as well as a model of excellent Christian scholarship and godly character. Additionally, I acknowledge the excellent feedback offered by my PhD examiners, Prof. N. T. Wright and Dr. Conrad Gempf, as well as by Prof. Catharine Edwards, who generously read and commented on several chapters. I am very grateful for the tremendous support offered by my colleagues at Bethlehem College and Seminary, including Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Dr. John Piper, Rev. Tom Steller, Mr. Jason Abell, Dr. Jason DeRouchie, Mr. Ryan Griffith, Dr. Jason Meyer, Mr. Travis Myers, Dr. Andy Naselli, Mr. Joe Rigney, Dr. Rick Shenk, Dr. John Beckman, Mr. Johnathon Bowers, and Mr. Matt Crutchmer. I acknowledge my teaching assistants Mickey Sheu and Zach Howard, who helped with proofreading portions of the thesis and scanning articles, as well as Dr. Antoine Fritz, Neil Schindler, and Shalomie Lamphere, who assisted with French and Italian translation. Thanks are due to the excellent library staffs at Bethlehem College and Seminary (Greg Rosauer), London School of Theology (Alan Linfield), Luther Seminary (Karen Alexander, Bruce Eldevik, and Judy Stone), and North Central University (Melody Windingland). Thanks also to Simon Sykes and others at Tyndale House, Cambridge, which offered superb facilities and a wonderful community of scholarship. Many others have been supportive in various ways throughout my PhD studies. I thank my father, Professor Murray Tabb, for reading and commenting on the thesis. He and my mother, Diane Tabb, along with my parents-in-law, Hardi and Debbie Rosner, offered constant encouragement as well as prayer, financial, and practical support. Thanks also to Dr. Dan Gurtner, Alex Kirk, David McCollough, and many others from Bethlehem Baptist Church, Eden Baptist Church, London School of Theology, and Tyndale House for their advice, encouragement, and friendship at different times through my PhD studies. iii I dedicate this work to my wife, Kristin, and to my children, Jeremiah and Julia. They have offered me constant support, balance, and encouragement, and have sacrificed in many ways to make this PhD possible. Kristin remarkably made time as a busy mother to read and comment on my thesis and graciously endured many conversations about my research. “The LORD is my chosen portion and my cup; you hold my lot. The lines have fallen for me in pleasant places; indeed, I have a beautiful inheritance” (Psalm 16:5–6). To God be all the glory! iv Abbreviations Abbreviations not listed below follow Alexander, Patrick H. et. al., The SBL Handbook of Style. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1999. Codex Sinaiticus א B Codex Vaticanus AevumAnt Aevum antiquum Auctor The anonymous author of 4 Maccabees BDAG Bauer, Walter, Frederick W. Danker, William F. Arndt, and F. Wilbur Gingrich. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. CEB Common English Bible. Nashville: Common English Bible, 2011. CFCL Cuad. Filol. Clás. Estudios Latinos DDD Toorn, Karel van der, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst, eds. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. 2nd ed. Leiden/Grand Rapids: Brill/ Eerdmans, 1999. DNTB Evans, Craig A. and Stanley E. Porter, eds. Dictionary of New Testament Background. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2000. EDEJ Collins, John J. and Daniel C. Harlow, eds. The Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010. EDSS Schiffman, Lawrence H. and James C. VanderKam, eds. Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. ESV English Standard Version Bible: Containing the Old and New Testaments with Apocrypha. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009; Wheaton: Crossway, 2001. FS Festschrift HCSB Holy Bible: Holman Christian Standard Bible. Red-letter text edition ed. Nashville: B&H, 2003. JVG Wright, N. T. Jesus and the Victory of God, Christian Origins and the Question of God 2. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1997. Göttingen Septuaginta. Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum Gottingensis editum, Göttingen, 1931–present. GR Greece & Rome HRCS Hatch, Edwin and Henry A. Redpath. A Concordance to the Septuagint and the Other Greek Versions of the Old Testament (Including the Apocryphal Books). 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon 1906. Reprint, Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998. Muraoka Muraoka, T. A Greek-English Lexicon of the Septuagint. Revised ed. Leuven: Peeters, 2009. LCL Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press) LSJ Liddell, Henry George, Robert Scott, Henry Stuart Jones, and Roderick McKenzie, eds. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. v NA28 Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012. NET NET Bible: New English Translation. Revised ed. Spokane, Wash.: Biblical Studies, 2003. NETS Pietersma, Albert and Benjamin G. Wright, eds. A New English Translation of the Septuagint. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. New Pauly Cancik, Hubert, Helmuth Schneider, and Christine F. Salazar, eds. Brill's New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. 16 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2002–10. NGÜ Bibel der Neue Genfer Übersetzung: Neues Testament und Psalmen. Romanel-sur-Lausanne: Genfer Bibelgesellschaft, 2011. NIDB Sakenfeld, Katharine D., ed. The New Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible. Nashville: Abingdon, 2006–10. NIV11 Holy Bible: New International Version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2011. NTPG Wright, N. T. The New Testament and the People of God, Christian Origins and the Question of God 1. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1992. OLD Glare, P. G. W., ed. Oxford Latin Dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 2012. OTP Charlesworth, James H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1983–85. OWC Oxford World Classics (Oxford University Press) PHI Packard Humanities Institute Classical Latin Texts. Online: http://latin.packhum.org/index. Rahlfs Rahlfs, Alfred and Robert Hanhart, eds. Septuaginta. Revised ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2006. Schlachter Schlachter, Franz E. Die Bibel. Geneva: Genfer Bibelgesellschaft, 2000. SEP Zalta, Edward N., ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University 2012 (Winter). Online: http://plato.stanford.edu/ Swete Swete, Henry B. The Old Testament in Greek according to the Septuagint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1930. TLG Thesaurus Linguae Graecae (University of California, Irvine). Online: http://www.tlg.uci.edu.
Recommended publications
  • Syllabus, Deuterocanonical Books
    The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Caravaggio. Saint Jerome Writing (oil on canvas), c. 1605-1606. Galleria Borghese, Rome. with Dr. Bill Creasy Copyright © 2021 by Logos Educational Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of this course—audio, video, photography, maps, timelines or other media—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage or retrieval devices without permission in writing or a licensing agreement from the copyright holder. Scripture texts in this work are taken from the New American Bible, revised edition © 2010, 1991, 1986, 1970 Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C. and are used by permission of the copyright owner. All Rights Reserved. No part of the New American Bible may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the copyright owner. 2 The Deuterocanonical Books (Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and additions to Daniel & Esther) Traditional Authors: Various Traditional Dates Written: c. 250-100 B.C. Traditional Periods Covered: c. 250-100 B.C. Introduction The Deuterocanonical books are those books of Scripture written (for the most part) in Greek that are accepted by Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as inspired, but they are not among the 39 books written in Hebrew accepted by Jews, nor are they accepted as Scripture by most Protestant denominations. The deuterocanonical books include: • Tobit • Judith • 1 Maccabees • 2 Maccabees • Wisdom (also called the Wisdom of Solomon) • Sirach (also called Ecclesiasticus) • Baruch, (including the Letter of Jeremiah) • Additions to Daniel o “Prayer of Azariah” and the “Song of the Three Holy Children” (Vulgate Daniel 3: 24- 90) o Suzanna (Daniel 13) o Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14) • Additions to Esther Eastern Orthodox churches also include: 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, Odes (which include the “Prayer of Manasseh”) and Psalm 151.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham's Uncircumcised Children
    ABRAHAM’S UNCIRCUMCISED CHILDREN: THE ENOCHIC PRECEDENT FOR PAUL’S PARADOXICAL CLAIM IN GALATIANS 3:29 by Amy Genevive Dibley A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union in Near Easter Religions in the Graduate Division of the University of California at Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor LeAnn Snow Flesher, Chair Professor Daniel Boyarin Professor Eugene Eung-Chun Park Professor Yair Zakovitch Professor Erich S. Gruen Fall 2013 ABSTRACT Abraham’s Uncircumcised Children: The Enochic Precedent for Paul’s Paradoxical Claim in Galatians 3:29 by Amy Genevive Dibley Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union in Near Easter Religions in the Graduate Division University of California, Berkeley Professor LeAnn Snow Flesher, Chair This study proposes the Book of Dreams as the precedent for Paul’s program of gentile reclamation qua gentiles predating the composition of the Epistles by two centuries. 1 Dedication To my husband Peter, for whom the words loving and supportive and partnership hardly begin to encompass the richness of our journey together through this process. For our girls, Langsea and Lucia (5 and 4 years old as I submit this), who when playing “mommy” pause from dressing and feeding baby dolls to write their own dissertations. In thanks to the women of First Covenant Church in Rockford, Illinois and Kerry Staurseth (Langsea’s godmother) who watched those most precious to me so that this first child could at last be born, proving that it also takes a village to write a dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unraveling the Mystery of the Old Testament Canon
    '.i rr:c $16:fr'ref , !L 1. ) tr, /LL , J.,t, - \t1ft, I \ryTI(}DH,Cil}E,S? Unraveling the Mystery of the Olcl Testament Canon to limit the their owlt faith for the Pharisees hcgitn. there ample. the Dead Sea scrolls, cotltaining rcn thc Chtrlclr tlrc books tlrey witnted to iltclude in thcir 'l'estatneltt saciecl tcxts ol lhc Esscrrc scct of 'ltrdaisrrt' were rlo New citlloll. Like the early ' Masorctic, Sanrari- revisccl Ilebrew Old'I'estarnent texts show evidencc tl['tltc hooks. Church, ihe Jews of Christ's tiure were not tan, antl [.,XX text bases. alortc wcrc trscd irs ScriP- particular set ol texts (be- the lall of Jerusaletn united atottncl a Testament used in the early tlowever. with ture. l-he Okl pro- yoncl the Tbrah, that is). They were orga- Rouran world was in AD 70. an intense stattdardization Cltrrch throughout the irized around a liturgical life in the temple cess begatr. Only the Pharisee ancl the not tlre l{ebrew Old Testametlt, Llut a trans- liturgical life, they survived this ancl synagogue' For this Testament into Creek Samaritirn sects of Judaistn lation of the Olcl 'lestatnent came to use texts in the services' However' 'Ihe process. 'l'he collection of Old callccl the Septtragint (LXX)' LXX the production bccrrrne thc the liturgical life prececled Alexarldria cluritrg lhc irooks into wltat cvcttttlally ' s as trlttrslatctl in of the texts ancl formed their conteit' [Iis- in the Masoletic text was begun by thc l)harisees reign of Ptolerlry II Philadelplltts as the .lewish faith cleveloped in Ctlttttcil ttl'.larrrnia,
    [Show full text]
  • Torah in the Diaspora: a Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-22-2013 12:00 AM Torah in the Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees Christopher J. Cornthwaite The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Daniel A. Smith The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Christopher J. Cornthwaite 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Cornthwaite, Christopher J., "Torah in the Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1207. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1207 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TORAH IN THE DIASPORA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHILO AND 4 MACCABEES (Thesis format: Monograph) by Christopher J. Cornthwaite Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Christopher J. Cornthwaite 2013 Abstract This thesis examines how Judaism was Hellenized by comparing how difference, boundaries, and syncretism function in both Philo and 4 Maccabees. Recent historical and anthropological methods demand rejection of old approaches to these works which differentiated between the Judaism and the Hellenism in them and were often dominated by attempts to show where these authors’ intellectual fidelities lay.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies
    0 Pseudepigrapha Bibliographies Bibliography largely taken from Dr. James R. Davila's annotated bibliographies: http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/~www_sd/otpseud.html. I have changed formatting, added the section on 'Online works,' have added a sizable amount to the secondary literature references in most of the categories, and added the Table of Contents. - Lee Table of Contents Online Works……………………………………………………………………………………………...02 General Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...…03 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………....03 Translations of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha in Collections…………………………………….…03 Guide Series…………………………………………………………………………………………….....04 On the Literature of the 2nd Temple Period…………………………………………………………..........04 Literary Approaches and Ancient Exegesis…………………………………………………………..…...05 On Greek Translations of Semitic Originals……………………………………………………………....05 On Judaism and Hellenism in the Second Temple Period…………………………………………..…….06 The Book of 1 Enoch and Related Material…………………………………………………………….....07 The Book of Giants…………………………………………………………………………………..……09 The Book of the Watchers…………………………………………………………………………......….11 The Animal Apocalypse…………………………………………………………………………...………13 The Epistle of Enoch (Including the Apocalypse of Weeks)………………………………………..…….14 2 Enoch…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..15 5-6 Ezra (= 2 Esdras 1-2, 15-16, respectively)……………………………………………………..……..17 The Treatise of Shem………………………………………………………………………………..…….18 The Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37-71)…………………………………………………………..…...18 The
    [Show full text]
  • Scripture in the Second Temple Period – from “The Law” to “The Law and the Prophets”
    Scripture in the Second Temple Period – from “the Law” to “the Law and the Prophets” A Mental List – the idea of “Scripture” begins as a rough, somewhat amorphous, mental catalogue of holy writings, which are mostly contained on individual scrolls • The basis for the concept of Scripture is the five “books of Moses” o Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy ▪ These are held by all Jews to be uniquely holy and divinely inspired • In synagogue Judaism, they are joined by the hazy category “and the prophets” The Development of “And the Prophets” (539 BC – 70 AD) • When we today hear the phrase “and the prophets,” we think of the writing prophets of the Old Testament and their “books of prophecy” o Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, “the Twelve,” and Daniel • But ancient Jews commonly had a much more expansive list of “prophets” in mind o Modern Jews designate Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings as the “former prophets” and Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and “the Twelve” as the “latter” ▪ The rest of the modern Jewish Bible is then referred to as “the Writings” • I.e. Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Chronicles o For ancient Jews, the picture is not so clear – personages like Enoch, Abraham, David, Solomon, Job, Daniel, etc. would have been viewed as “prophets” (cf. Acts 2.29-30) – so, if one were to possess authentic writings by (or possibly about) these persons, they might also be considered to be “prophetic” and a part of “the prophets” ▪ E.g. Psalms (for David), Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs (for Solomon), Lamentations (for Jeremiah), etc.
    [Show full text]
  • APOCRYPHA: the HIDDEN WRITINGS ______Men’S Ministries International
    APOCRYPHA: THE HIDDEN WRITINGS _______________________________ Men’s Ministries International Introduction to the Apocrypha I. Introduction to the Holy Scriptures A. Names and Definitions 1. Bible - Greek “biblos” - a book - Matthew 1:2 2. Canon - Greek “kanon” - rule or standard 3. Septuagint - “seventy” - Old Testament in Greek - 180 BC 4. Vulgate - “common” - Old Testament in Latin - 4th Century AD B. Process 1. Revelation - God directly communicates truth not known 2. Inspiration - Spirit-moved people to produce Spirit-breathed readings 3. Illumination - influence of the Holy Spirit for understanding C. Divisions 1. Old Testament - Covenant - 39 books a. The Law - Pentateuch or Torah b. The Prophets -Major/ Minor (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel) c. The Writings 1. Historical - Joshua thru Esther 2. Poetical - Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon 2. New Testament - 27 books a. Gospels d. Pastoral Epistles - 1,2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon b. Acts of the Apostles e. General (Hebrew) Epistles c. Pauline Epistles f. Prophetic - Revelation D. Canonicity 1. Apostolic - Was the book written by an Apostle or someone who knew an Apostle? 2. Spiritual Content - Proven a means of edification? (grace/justification/ holiness) 3. Doctrinal Soundness - Did the book conflict with the other books? 4. Usage - Was the book universally recognized and quoted by the Church Fathers? 5. Divine Inspiration - Did it give true evidence of Divine inspiration? - II Timothy 3:16 II. Introduction to the Apocrypha Books (Old Testament) A. Development 1. None of these books is included in the Hebrew canon of Holy Scriptures 2. Written some time between 300BC and 100AD - Septuagint - inclusive 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Xeravits, Géza G. "Abraham in the Old Testament Apocrypha." Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature
    Xeravits, Géza G. "Abraham in the Old Testament Apocrypha." Abraham in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. Ed. Sean A. Adams and Zanne Domoney-Lyttle. London: T&T Clark, 2019. 29–40. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567675545.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 22:19 UTC. Copyright © Sean A. Adams, Zanne Domoney-Lyttle and contributors 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. C h a p t e r 2 A BRAHAM IN THE O LD T ESTAMENT A POCRYPHA * G é z a G . X e r a v i t s Th e patriarch Abraham is one of the most pre- eminent fi gures of the Old Testament. Th e “fi rst Jew,” benefi ciary of God’s promises and covenant is an exciting personality already according to the primary epical source where he fi rst appears (Genesis). It is no wonder that later biblical texts and the authors of the literature of early Judaism were heavily interested in Abraham, and developed a rich tradition around him.1 Th is contribution intends to explore texts that belong to a rather artifi cial category, the Deuterocanonical books or the Old Testament Apocrypha. Th ese late Second Temple period writings do not appear in the Hebrew Bible, but found their way into the Septuagint and its parent versions.2 Th e evidence might be categorized into four distinct groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen Southeastern University - Lakeland, [email protected]
    Southeastern University FireScholars Classical Conversations Spring 2019 Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen Southeastern University - Lakeland, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://firescholars.seu.edu/ccplus Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Andersen, Alex, "Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha" (2019). Classical Conversations. 3. https://firescholars.seu.edu/ccplus/3 This Term Paper is brought to you for free and open access by FireScholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Conversations by an authorized administrator of FireScholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Southeastern University Reconsidering the Roman Catholic Apocrypha Alex Andersen English 1233 Professor Grace Veach April 12, 2019 Andersen 1 Abstract For centuries, Protestants have debated with Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians over the canonicity of the Roman Catholic Apocrypha, a collection of seven books and two additions to books composed from the third century B.C. to the first century A.D. and considered to be canonical by all major non-Protestant Christian denominations. This thesis plunges into this discussion on the Roman Catholic Apocrypha’s canonicity, contending that the Roman Catholic Apocrypha is noncanonical. First, this thesis propounds two broad models for canonicity, the Community Canon Model and the Intrinsic Canon Model, and maintains that the Intrinsic Canon Model is a better model for canonicity than the Community Canon Model. It then explains that many books in the Roman Catholic Apocrypha do not fit the Intrinsic Canon Model’s criteria for canonicity. Next, an argument is made that the Jews had fixed the Hebrew canon during the lifetimes of Jesus and the apostles and that this Hebrew canon excluded the Roman Catholic Apocrypha.
    [Show full text]
  • The Books Between the Testaments: What Christians Should Know About the Apocrypha
    The Books between the Testaments: What Christians Should Know about the Apocrypha SESSION 1 Why do some Bibles contain extra books? Why are they called different things by different religious groups? How do Protestants, Roman Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox differ in their understanding of the importance of these books? Introduction Have you ever noticed that some Bibles have the words “with Apocrypha” written on their spines? In the Revised Standard Version of the Holy Bible, these words refer to nineteen books or parts of books placed after Malachi and before the Gospel of Matthew. How did these books come to be placed in the middle of the Bible, and what value, if any, do they have? If you exam- ine The New American Bible used by Roman Catholics, you will fi nd that this Bible has no such middle section. Why? How then do these Christians regard these books, and do they read them? These are some of the questions that we will consider in the fi rst session before turning in the second session to study Tobit, which is one of the means that even though Protestants have usually called books in the Apocrypha. these books the Apocrypha and gather them together between the Old and New Testaments, Roman Catholic What Do We Call and Eastern Orthodox Christians regard them as Scrip- These Writings? ture but acknowledge them as Scripture that was writ- ten later than the other books. Since still other books Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christians are called the New Testament Apocrypha, the term Old call some of the books that Protestants fi nd between Testament Apocrypha is often preferred.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quick + Comprehensive Introduction to the Bible
    START HERE a quick + comprehensive introduction to the Bible START HERE a quick + comprehensive introduction to the Bible with Deuterocanonicals/ Apocrypha START HERE a quick + comprehensive introduction to the Bible with Deuterocanonicals/ Apocrypha PHILADELPHIA START HERE: A QUICK AND COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION TO THE BIBLE © 1998, 2017 American Bible Society American Bible Society 101 North Independence Mall East FL8 Philadelphia PA 19106-2155 Revised edition. First issued as “Bible Reading Helps.” ISBN 978-1-941448-48-9 / ABS Item 124609 (Standard edition) ISBN 978-1-941448-49-6 / ABS Item 124610 (with Deuterocanonicals /Apocrypha) Printed in the United States of America American Bible Society offers many Bible resources for adults and children, including book introductions, discussion questions, cultural backgrounds, and more. Visit our website: resources.americanbible.org You can also visit our Bible Search tool to read and interact with the Bible in hundreds of languages. Bibles.org “In the beginning was the Word …” John 1:1 (ESV) START HERE WITH THE BIBLE he Bible is one of the greatest books the world has ever seen. It is a book full of profound wisdom and insight about human nature T and the character and purpose of the God who created all things. Throughout the centuries, people from many lands have opened the Bible and read from it in their own language. Here they have learned about God’s love and justice. Great leaders and thinkers, along with people who are poor, suffering, or oppressed, have searched its pages and explored its truths, looking for the answers to life’s problems and challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apocrypha
    The Apocrypha by Daniel J. Lewis © Copyright 2000 by Diakonos, Inc. Troy, Michigan United States of America 2 Preface The apocrypha may be the most well-known collection of biblical documents, other than the Old and New Testaments, which is regularly neglected and ignored. In the past these books have been highly valued for private study and devotion by both the ancient Jewish community and also the ancient Christian community. The earliest Christians used for their Bible the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the Old Testament, as well as the growing number of documents which now make up the New Testament. The Septuagint contained a number of Jewish works written between 200 B.C. and 100 A.D., specifically a number of additions to Old Testament books (Esther, Daniel, Jeremiah, Chronicles) as well as other works, some fictional, some historical and some theological. These works were eventually excluded from the Protestant and Jewish canons (but eventually retained in the Roman and Orthodox canons). Their canonical status was somewhat ambiguous until the 16th century, when they were given deutero-canonical status by the Roman Catholic Church at the Council of Trent. Though the Protestant Reformers considered such works to be less authoritative than the canonical Scriptures, they did not discard them. In fact, the apocryphal books have been printed in most versions of the English Bible (including the KJV) from earliest times until 1827, when they were omitted. Since that time, Protestants, especially, have regarded the apocryphal books with suspicion, even though they were part of the devotional literature of the Christian church for most of its history.
    [Show full text]