Revision Der Ostalpinen Heliolitina. Helmut Walter Flügel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revision Der Ostalpinen Heliolitina. Helmut Walter Flügel Mitteilungen des Museums für Bergbau, Geologie und T echnik 1956 am Landesmuseum " J oanneum", Graz Heft 17 HELMUT FLÜGEL Revision der ostalpinen Heliolitina Diesem Heft ist der .Jahresberieht des Museums für Bergbau, Geologie und Technik für da s Jahr 1956 an geschlossen Für Form und Inhalt sind die Mitarbeiter allein verantwortlich Druck: Leykam A. G., Graz Revision der ostalpinen Heliolitina Von Helmut Flügel Im Rahmen der Revision der tabulaten Korallen des Grazer Paläo­ zoikums durch Prof. Dr. A. v. SCHOUPPE war auch di e Bearbeitung der HeIiolitina geplant. Seine Berufung an die Universität Münster/Westfalen verhinderte die Ausführung dieses Vorhabens. Da jedoch die Neuauf­ sammlungen der vergangeneu Jahre ein reiches Fossilmaterial gebracht hatten, schien es unumgänglich notwendig, diese Arbeiten weiterzufüh­ ren. Dabei wurde es wünschenswert, auch die alten Materialien der Kar­ nischen Alpen einer Revision zu unterziehen. Dies führte zu r vorliegen­ den Gesamtdarstellung der ostalpinen Heliolitina. Es ist mir eine angenehme Pflicht, Herrn Prof. BONI, Universität Pavia, Herrn Prof. BRINKMANN, Universität Bonn, Herrn Prof. HAU­ SER (t), Technische Hochschule Graz, Herrn Prof. KAHLER, Landes­ museum Klagenfurt, Herrn Prof. METZ, Universität Graz, Herrn Dok­ tor MURBAN, Landesmuseum Joanneum Graz, Herrn Doz. Dr. PRANTL, Nar. Museum Prag, Herrn Prof. H. SCHMIDT, Universität Göttingen, Herrn Prof. TREVISAN, Universität Pisa, und Herrn .P rof. VENZO, Uni­ versität Parma, für die Überlassung von Oniginal- und Vergleichsmateria­ lien herzliehst zu danken. Desgleichen bin ich H errn Prof. KIESLINGER, Technische Hochschule Wien, und Herrn Prof. VINASSA de REGNY, Genua, für ihre entgegenkommenden Auskünfte zu Dank verbunden. Herrn Professor Dr. A. v. SCHOUPPE, Münster/W estf., danke ich für die Freigabe der von ihm für eine Revision vorgesehenen alten Aufsamm­ lungen aus dem Grazer Paläozoikum. Historischer Rückblick Fast alle altpaläozoischen Sedimentationsbecken der Ostalpen liefer­ ten Helioliten. Vorwiegend stammen sie aus dem Grazer Paläozoikum und dem der Karnischen Alpen, aber auch aus dem Devon des Burgen­ landes und der nördlichen Grauwackenzon e kennen wir Einzelfunde. Ein Teil der Materialien aus den erstgenannten Gebieten ist noch vorhanden und daher überprüfbar. Leider gilt dies - von einer Ausnahme abgesehen - für die wenigen Formen 'aus dem übrigen ostalpinen Raum nicht und sie können daher in den Faunenlisten nur mit Vorbehalt angerührt wer­ den. Zu den er wähnten alten Materialien kommen noch reiche Neu­ aufsammlungen aus dem Grazer Raum. a) Das Grazer Paläozoikum Die erste Erwähnung dieser Gruppe finden wbr 1843 bei UNGER, aber erst bei ROLLE taucht 1856 der Name Heliolites auf. PETERS 1867 und STACHE 1879 lieferten einige w eitere Angaben, die sich jedoch heute nicht mehr überprüfen lassen. 55 1887 bzw. 1894 konnte PENECKE zeigen, daß die im Grazer Paläo­ zoikum unter der Bezeichnung Heliolites porosus gehende Art nur zum Teil der der Eifel entspricht und daß sich hi er unter diesem Begriff auch eine neue Art verbirgt. Dies muß, nach Ausweis des Inventarkataloges des Geologischen Institutes der Universität Graz, bereits 1879 HOERNES bekannt gewesen sein, da wir zu diesem Zeitpunkt erstmals von dessen Hand die Bezeichnung "Heliolites barrandei nov. form." finden. Die beiden Arbeiten von PENECKE sind übrigens mit Ausnahme eine r Neubeschreibung von Heliolites barrandei durch KETTNEROVA 1933 und einer unpublizierten Dissertationsarbeit von MEGGENDORFER 1944 die einzigen, die sich paläontologisch mit den Helioliten des Grazer De vons beschäftigen. Wohl aber finden wir 1954 durch SCHOUPPE, 1956 durch FLÜGEL Beschreibungen von Helioliten des Gotlandiums. Eine zusammenfassende Üb ersicht findet sich in Tab elle 1. b) Karnische Alpen und Karawanken Im Gegensatz zum Grazer Paläozoikum liegen aus di esem Raum zahl­ reiche Arbeiten vor, welche sich rein paläontologisch mit den Helioliten auseinandersetzen. so die Studien von PENECKE 1887, ANGELIS d'OSSAT 1899 und 1901, VINASSA de REGNY 1908 und 1918, CHARLESWORTH 1914, HERITSCH 1929, CERRI 1931 und SCHOUPPE 1954. Dies erklärt auch, weshalb wir von hier verhältnismäßig viele, zum Teil jedoch rein lokale Formen kennen. Vor allem ist es das Gebiet um den Findenig­ kogel, welches immer wieder Faunen lieferte. Leider stammt das üb er mehrere Fundpunkte verteilte Material durchwegs aus Halden und ist daher für eine stratigraphische Auswertung ungeeignet. Mit Sicherheit sind die korallenführenden Lagen ungleichzeitig. Ein Teil gehört dem Gotlandium an, andere Bänke dürften sogar bis in das Mitteldevon reichen. Faziell scheint man - nach den Rollstücken beurteilt - die ein­ zelnen Bänke kaum voneinander trennen zu können. Dies führte zur De­ finition der "Übergangsschichten" oder "ef" (HERITSCH 1943). Tabelle 2 gibt den Kenntnisstand vor Beginn der Revision wi ed er. c) Das Devon des Burgenlandes 1878 beschrieb TOULA aus einer bei Hannersdorf im südlichen Burgen­ land gefundenen Korallenfauna Heliolites porosus GOLDFUSS. Der Ver­ such, den Verbleib dieses Fo ssils zu eruieren, blie b leider erfolglos. Herr Prof. KIESLINGER hatte die Freundlichkeit mir mitzuteilen, daß das Material seinerzeit in der Sammlung der Technischen Hochschule Wien aufbewahrt war, jedoch heute nicht mehr auffindbar ist. Da die Beschreibung von TOULA zu einer sicheren Identifizierung nicht aus­ reicht, kann seine Angabe weiterhin nur mit Vorbehalt genannt werden. d) Nördliche Grauwackenzone Die einzigen Angaben über Funde in diesem Raum stammen von HERITSCH. 1905 gab er vom Gösseck und der Moosalpe die Funde von Heliolites porosus, 1916 vom Triebenstein den eines Heliolites sp. an. Einzig letztere Angabe ist überprüfbar. Es handelt sich um Helio lites (Heliolites) porosus muZtiporus CERRI. Es ist daher die Ansicht, wonach 56 ;:! ;:!'" '" .... 0 <ll <ll 0 '"l-- "ö'" '" ;:! "ö V) ~ 0 0 ;:!'" ...,'" ~ R, Ol <ll <j a . ~ <ll ~ 0 l-- <j 0 '"l-- ~ l-- .=:= '"<ll l-- R- R, 0 <ll <j '0 ;::> R, ..0 N '" '" 0 ~ I ~ I :t'l '"<ll '"<ll '"<ll '"<ll '"<ll -; ~ ."';:: ."';:: ."';:: ~ ~ ~ Q" .s ~ ~ :§ .s .~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <ll I!) N ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ol.. I.:) " ., V) '".,. I I I!) I: FRECH 1887 1+ Pasterkfe1sen ~" 't:l ~" 't:l I I II I I ::: .,..,I: HERITSCH 1905 I 1 I I+ I I Reiting =V) ., I!) '-' 't:l ~ g HERITSCH 1905 [ Moosalpe " N I I I ::: ::l 1 + I ol 0"'" HERITSCH 1916 I o- Trieben stei n =I!) I I I II ll.ll .. ~-:l TOULA 1877 I I 1 I + I I H annersdorf = Oll I: = ::l_'" " V) I:Q BENDA 1927 Hanner sdorf I!) C I I I I + I I 0 _ 't:l °cn HERITSCH 1917 S chloßber g eS "> I I+ I I I 1 ::: I!) 0 ~ HERITSCH 1943 Plabutsch N 1 I I I I 1+ ::: I!).. I!) HERITSCH 1943 Schirdinggraben .=: 't:l IIIII 1+ Q ol ::: HERITSCH 1943 Fiefenmühle ~ ::: I I I I· I 1+ .~ Schin delgraben =ol I!) MEYER 1937 +1+1 I I 1+ I.:).. =.. HERITSCH 1917 Olberg 0 1 1 I 1 1+ ..I!) .. 't:l HERITSCH 1917 I 1 I 1 1+ Kollerkogel I!) HERITSCH 1917 G eisber g .=:= S 1 1 I 1 1+ ::: ;j HERITSCH 1917 "I Marmorbruch ol .=: I 1 1 1+ ~ '0 ol N HERITSCH 1917 Trötsch .. 0 I 1 1 1 1+ ol :(1\ ~ (ij HERITSCH 1917 I I 1 I 1+ Br eitena u er kreuz .. 0.. I!) .... HERITS CH 1917 Türnauergraben 't:l Q) I 1 1 I 1+ N ol Cll HERITSCH 1917 Hubenhalt .5 .... I I I + I 1 :.:: o HERITSCH 1917 Zechnerm a r ~ I I 1+ 1 I Gi HERITSCH 1917 I I 1+1 1 T ü rnauer alpe == Mixnitzbach I!) HERITSCH 1917 I" 1 I+ I I Q ... HERITSCH 1917 I I 1+ 1 1 Zachenspitze HERITSCH 1917 Gipfel ~ 1 1 1+ I 1 " Gi .r> HERITSCH 1917 Hochlantsch ol I 1+ 1 I 1 ~ SCHOUPPE 1954 I I +1 1 I Parrnaseggkogel FLüGEL 1956 I I + 1 1+ 1 Parrnaseggkogel 57 e CJ e . ~ CJ . ~ l:3 .~ 0 l-- l-- ~ 0 :0 l:3 e ~ CJ R. l-- '0 ........ ~ .... ~ ;:; .~ '0'" C1l .... ~ '";:l ;:l'" > '";:l ~ ~ ,...,.... .... .... ~ .... .(i) CJ CJ ~ '"0 . ~ ~ '"~ '"~ '0 '0 .... ~ ~ ;:; ;:l ~ '";:l ;:l .... .... ~ ~ '" '" 'p. ~ l:3 e CJ l-- l-- l-- l-- .... 0 0 '"0 '"0 '"~ '"~ .... '"l-- '"l-- l-- l-- .... .... CJ ~ l-- l-- ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 l:3 l:3 '"~ R. R. R. R. .... .~ '0 CJ .0 .0 '"~ '"~ '"~ '"~ ~'" '"~ '"~ '"~ '"~ '"~ '"~ ~ ~ ........ .~ :\: .~ .~ ~ ........ .... ........ ....0 S ] ] ] ,...,~ ~ ....0 Ö.... ~ ,...,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: ::r:: CERRI 1931 [+ 1+1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ [ I Casa Lodin CERRI 1931 I 1+1 + 1+[+ 1+[ [ Lodin alte CERRI 1931 [ II 1 I [+ 1 [ Pal Grande CERRI 1931 I [ 1 1+ [ 1 [ I Forca di Lanca CERRI 1931 1+ 1+ 1 I 1 I [ 1 Clap di milie . CERRI 1931 I [+ 1 1 I [ I [ Ramaz inferior CHARLESWORTH [ [ Ffndenigkogel 1914 1 1 II I +1 FRECH 1894 II [ I [ I 1+ [ Findenigkogel FRECH 1894 [ 1 1 II I [ I + Poludnig HERITSCH 1929 I 1 [ [[ I 1+ I Rauchkofel HERITSCH 1929 I I I I [ I 1+ I Cellonetta HERITSCH 1943 I [ I II I 1+ [ Obstoanser ANGELIS O'OS- SAT 1899, 1901 1 I 1+ [+ 1+ 1+[ [ 1 + Lodinut SCHOUPPE 1954 I [ [ II [+ 1 1 [ Cellon SCHOUPPE 1954 1 1 1 [ 1 1+1 1 I Rauchkofel SCHOUPPE 1954 I I 1 I 1 [+1 1 I [ Findenig SCHOUPPE 1954 I [ 1 I I [+ 1 I [ I Seekopf SCHOUPPE 1954 I [ I 1 I 1+ 1 I 1 I Valentintörl VINASSA de REGNY 1908 I II 1+ 1 1+1 I 1 1+ Casa Lodin alte VINASSA de REGNY 1915 I 1 I 1+1 I 1 1 I 1 Clap di milie VINASSA de REGNY 1918 1 1 I 1+1 1 I I 1+1 Casa Monumenz PENECKE 1887 + 1 1 1 [ 1 [ I 1 I I Oisternigg 58 im Triebensteingebiet nur Vdsekalke auftreten, zu revidieren. Bereits 1933 hat HERITSCH vermutet, daß daneben noch Altpaläozoikum vor­ handen sein dürfte. Ein weiteres Exemplar dieser Unterart (Nr. P. 599) wurde mit der Fundortangabe Sunk 1925 durch HERITSCH der Sammlung des Geo­ logischen Institutes Graz zugeführt.
Recommended publications
  • Carboniferous Tabulate Corals from the Sardar Formation in the Ozbak-Kuh Mountains, East-Central Iran
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. C, 46, pp. 47–59, December 25, 2020 Carboniferous Tabulate Corals from the Sardar Formation in the Ozbak-kuh Mountains, East-Central Iran Shuji Niko1* and Mahdi Badpa2 1 Department of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 739–8521, Japan 2 Department of Geology, Payame Noor University of Qom, Qom, Iran *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Five species of tabulate corals are described from the Serpukhovian–Bashkirian (late early– early late Carboniferous) part of the Sardar Formation in the Ozbak-kuh Mountains, East-Central Iran. They are Michelinia flugeli sp. nov., late Bashkirian, Michelinia sp. indet., late Bashkirian, Donetzites mariae Flügel, 1975, late Serpukhovian, Syringopora iranica sp. nov., late Serpukhovian, and Multithe- copora sp. cf. M. huanglungensis Lee and Chu in Lee et al., 1930, late Serpukhovian to late Bashkirian. The Sardar tabulate coral fauna occurs from limestones that formed in Peri-Gondwana at the low lati- tudes of the southern hemisphere and faced the Paleo-Tethys Ocean. Except for a cosmopolitan species, closely related to comparable species with the fauna are reported from the Akiyoshi seamount chain, the South China Continent, and the Australian eastern Gondwana. Key words: Serpukhovian–Bashkirian, late early–early late Carboniferous, Favositida, Auloporida, Peri-Gondwana Introduction et al. (2006) separated its upper part from the for- mation as the Zaladu Formation that is correlative The Ozbak-kuh Mountains are a fault topography with the Gzhelian (late late Carboniferous) to Asse- in the Kashmar-Kerman Tectonic Zone (Stöcklin lian (early early Permian).
    [Show full text]
  • ULG GEOLOGICA VOL 19-1-2 Pickett P1-14.Indd
    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2016) 19/1-2: 43-56 Settlement strategy in Symplectophyllum (Cnidaria, Rugosa) JOHN W. PICKETT Honorary Research Associate, Geological Survey of New South Wales, W.B. Clarke Geoscience Centre, 947-953 Londonderry Road, Londonderry NSW 2573, Australia; [email protected]. ABSTRACT. The early ontogeny of the solitary rugose coral Symplectophyllum from the late Tournaisian – early Viséan of New South Wales is described. The genus is frequently associated with the phaceloid tabulate coral Syringopora, individuals of the former genus occurring within the coralla of the latter, and growing in tandem. A similar association also occurs between Symplectophyllum and the rugosan genera Cionodendron and Pickettodendron, though less commonly. The phaceloid genera suffer periodic mortality events, causing breaks in vertical growth; the settlement of Symplectophyllum larvae appears to be associated with these events. Larvae settle on algal incrustations of the epitheca of the phaceloid corals, not on the epitheca itself. The manner in which Symplectophyllum corallites acquired space for growth suggests the presence of sweeper tentacles in Rugosa. KEYWORDS: Ontogeny, settlement strategy, Carboniferous, Syringopora, Symplectophyllum, mortality crisis, ecology, sweeper tentacles 1. Introduction may be associated with Syringopora, also abundant at the locality, but in general the material is more fragmentary. This locality is an The larger solitary corals of the Early Carboniferous in eastern allochthonous, though penecontemporaneous slump in the Namoi Australia – Amygdalophyllum Dun & Benson, 1920, Merlewoodia Formation, lying probably in its upper part. Pickett, 1967 and Symplectophyllum Hill, 1934 – have broad The localities are different in age, though direct control dissepimentaria characterised by an outer zone of large and through conodont assemblages is lacking and samples to date irregular lonsdaleoid dissepiments, axial of which is a zone of have not produced a result.
    [Show full text]
  • • Every Major Animal Phylum That Exists on Earth Today, As Well As A
    • Every major animal phylum that exists on Earth today, as well as a few more that have since become ex:nct, appeared within less than 10 million years during the early Cambrian evolu:onary radiaon, also called the Cambrian explosion. • Phylum Pro:sta includes a diverse group of eukaryo:c microorganisms which are mostly unicellular. They are not necessarily primi:ve, although some are. Only some have a skeleton that can be preserved as a fossil. • Foraminifera and radiolaria are the most important examples. Coccolithophores, diatoms, and dinoflagellates are also examples. • Foraminifera are marine organisms that may be either planktonic, living in the water column where they float at various levels, or benthic, living on or within the seafloor sediment. • They form relavely large (0.1 mm to 5 cm) porous internal skeletons called tests through which project strands of living cytoplasm. The single- to mul:-chambered tests may be composed of organic maer, agglu:nated sand grains or sponge spicules, or calcium carbonate. • Benthic foraminifera • Planktonic foraminifera (Cambrian to Recent). (Jurassic to Recent). Oligocene Eocene • Radiolaria are planktonic marine organisms that tend to live in relavely cold water. • Their tests, oNen delicate and elaborate, are made of silica and presently accumulate on the floors of the parts of oceans that are deeper than those where foraminiferal tests are accumulang. • Radiolaria (Cambrian to • Radiolaria (Cambrian to Recent). Recent). Paleocene Radiolaria • Coccolithophores (Triassic to Recent) are extremely small marine planktonic photosynthe:c unicellular algae that are enclosed by plates of low-Mg calcite called coccoliths. Cretaceous White Cliffs of Dover, England • Diatoms (Jurassic to Recent) are small freshwater and marine planktonic photosynthe:c unicellular algae that are enclosed by a cell wall made of silica called a frustule.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park
    Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park By Linda Sue Lassiter1, Justin S. Tweet2, Frederick A. Sundberg3, John R. Foster4, and P. J. Bergman5 1Northern Arizona University Department of Biological Sciences Flagstaff, Arizona 2National Park Service 9149 79th Street S. Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 3Museum of Northern Arizona Research Associate Flagstaff, Arizona 4Utah Field House of Natural History State Park Museum Vernal, Utah 5Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona Introduction As impressive as the Grand Canyon is to any observer from the rim, the river, or even from space, these cliffs and slopes are much more than an array of colors above the serpentine majesty of the Colorado River. The erosive forces of the Colorado River and feeder streams took millions of years to carve more than 290 million years of Paleozoic Era rocks. These exposures of Paleozoic Era sediments constitute 85% of the almost 5,000 km2 (1,903 mi2) of the Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and reveal important chronologic information on marine paleoecologies of the past. This expanse of both spatial and temporal coverage is unrivaled anywhere else on our planet. While many visitors stand on the rim and peer down into the abyss of the carved canyon depths, few realize that they are also staring at the history of life from almost 520 million years ago (Ma) where the Paleozoic rocks cover the great unconformity (Karlstrom et al. 2018) to 270 Ma at the top (Sorauf and Billingsley 1991). The Paleozoic rocks visible from the South Rim Visitors Center, are mostly from marine and some fluvial sediment deposits (Figure 5-1).
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Serpukhovian (Carboniferous) Coral Assemblages from the Northwestern Part of the Moscow Basin (Russia)
    TO L O N O G E I L C A A P I ' T A A T L E I I A Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 59 (3), 2020, 225-233. Modena C N O A S S. P. I. New data on the Serpukhovian (Carboniferous) coral assemblages from the northwestern part of the Moscow Basin (Russia) Ian D. Somerville, Olga L. Kossovaya, Sergio Rodríguez* & Pedro Cózar I.D. Somerville, UCD School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; [email protected] O.L. Kossovaya, All-Russian Geological Survey Institute VSEGEI, Srednyy Prospect 74, R-199026 St. Petersburg, Russia; Kremlyovskaya St. 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420008; [email protected] S. Rodríguez, Departamento de Paleontología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, c/ José Antonio Nováis 12, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), c/ Severo Ochoa 7, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] *corresponding author P. Cózar, Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), c/ Severo Ochoa 7, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] KEY WORDS - Mississippian, Tabulata, Rugosa, Lonsdaleiinae, northwestern Russia. ABSTRACT - Research in two quarries of the Borovichi area near the Uglovka town (northwestern Moscow Basin) has provided several rugose and tabulate corals that improve the knowledge on the palaeontology of that area. The Zarech’e quarry yielded rare specimens of Syringopora reticulata and Dibunophyllum bipartitum, as well as common specimens of Actinocyathus floriformis, A. borealis and A. crassiconus. The Uglovka quarry provided also Syringopora reticulata, Dibunophyllum bipartitum but different species of colonial rugosans: Actinocyathus sp., Lonsdaleia multiseptata and Schoenophyllum sp.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico's Fossil Record Stuart A
    New Mexico Quarterly Volume 32 | Issue 1 Article 21 1962 New Mexico's Fossil Record Stuart A. Northrop Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq Recommended Citation Northrop, Stuart A.. "New Mexico's Fossil Record." New Mexico Quarterly 32, 1 (1962). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq/ vol32/iss1/21 This Contents is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Mexico Press at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Quarterly by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Northrop: New Mexico's Fossil Record NEW MEXICO'S FOSSIL-RECORD Published by UNM Digital Repository, 1962 1 New Mexico Quarterly, Vol. 32 [1962], Iss. 1, Art. 21 .. The Eighth Annual U. N. M. Research Lecture The Eighth Annual University of New Mexico Research Lecture was delivered on April 7, 1961, by Dr. Stuart A. Northrop. Now Research Profes­ sor and Curator of the Geology· Museum at the University, Dr. Northrop has served this institution since 1928 as as~istant professor, associate profes­ sor, professor, Chairman of the Department of Geology, Curator of the Geology Museum, and Acting Dean of the Graduate School. Primarily a paleontologist and stratigrapher, he has written several books (including Minerals of New Mexico) and numerous articles on the geology of Gaspe (Quebec), Colorado, and New Mexico. ' . A member of numerous local, state, and national societies, he was presi­ dent, New Mexico Geological Society (1949-50); president, University of New Mexico Chapter of Sigma Xi (1955-56); chairman, Rocky Mountain Section, Ge6logical Society of America (1955-56), and became an Honorary member, New Mexico Geological Society May 4, 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Fossil Collections in Scotland Review of Fossil Collections in Scotland
    Detail of the Upper Devonian fishHoloptychius from Dura Den, Fife. © Perth Museum & Art Gallery, Perth & Kinross Council Review of Fossil Collections in Scotland Review of Fossil Collections in Scotland Contents Introduction 3 Background 3 Aims of the Collections Review 4 Methodology 4 Terminology 5 Summary of fossil material 6 Influences on collections 14 Collections by region Aberdeen and North East 17 Elgin Museum (Moray Society) 18 Falconer Museum (Moray Council) 21 Stonehaven Tolbooth Museum 23 The Discovery Centre (Live Life Aberdeenshire) 24 Arbuthnot Museum (Live Life Aberdeenshire) 27 Zoology Museum (University of Aberdeen Museums) 28 Meston Science Building (University of Aberdeen Museums) 30 Blairs Museum 37 Highlands and Islands 38 Inverness Museum and Art Gallery (High Life Highland) 39 Nairn Museum 42 West Highland Museum (West Highland Museum Trust) 44 Brora Heritage Centre (Brora Heritage Trust) 45 Dunrobin Castle Museum 46 Timespan (Timespan Heritage and Arts Society) 48 Stromness Museum (Orkney Natural History Society) 50 Orkney Fossil and Heritage Centre 53 Shetland Museum and Archives (Shetland Amenity Trust) 56 Bute Museum (Bute Museum Trust) 58 Hugh Miller’s Birthplace Cottage and Museum (National Trust for Scotland) 59 Treasures of the Earth 62 Staffin Dinosaur Museum 63 Gairloch Museum (Gairloch & District Heritage Company Ltd) 65 Tayside, Central and Fife 66 Stirling Smith Art Gallery and Museum 67 Perth Museum and Art Gallery (Culture Perth and Kinross) 69 The McManus: Dundee’s Art Gallery and Museum (Leisure
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of North American Late Paleozoic Coral Species (Coelenterata, Anthozoa)
    Checklist of North American Late Paleozoic Coral Species (Coelenterata, Anthozoa) By WILLIAM J. SANDO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1 3 8 7 A bibliographic compilation through 1973 of coral species described from the Mississippian, Pennsylvanian, and Permian rocks of North America UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1974 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Sando, William Jasper. Checklist of North American late Paleozoic coral species (Coelenterata, Anthozoa) (Geological Survey bulletin; 1387) Includes bibliography. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1387 1. Anthozoa, Fossil. 2. Paleontology-Paleozoic. 3. PaletOntology-North America. I. Title. II. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Bulletin; 1387. QE75.B9 no. 1387 [QE778] 557.3'08s [56,3.'.6] 74-23375 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 -Price 70 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-Q2576 CONTENTS Pag.e · Abstract ------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction ---------------------------------------------------- 1 Species list ------------------------------_______________ -------- 2 References cited ------------------------------------------------ 26 III CHECKLIST OF NORTH AMERICAN LATE PALEOZOIC CORAL SPECIES (COELENTERATA, ANTHOZOA) By WILLIAM J. SANDO ABSTRACT An objective list of coral species described from the Mississippian, Penn­ sylvanian, and Permian rocks of North Ame~ica includes 578 entries, of which four are now known to be from older rocks and four are probably erroneous references to older species. The list includes information on the original references for all species and the geologic age and geographic area from which the species have been described. INTRODUCTION This paper presents an objective list of formally named coral species that have been described from rocks of Mississippian, Pennsylvanian, and Permian age in North America through 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Fossils
    ~ns3 STA TE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES · DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 54 OHIO f OSSILS COLUMBUS NINTH PRINTING 1970 STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief BULLETIN 54 OHIO FOSSILS BY AURELE LA ROCQUE AND MILDRED FISHER MARPLE COLUMBUS 1955 NINTH PRINTING 1970 FRONTISPIECE. Phacops rana milleri, an almost complete specimen from the Silica formation near Sylvania, Ohio. X 2. 75 (See page 92). CONTENTS Preface Page Chapter 1. Introduction . 1 What fossils are . 1 Where fossils are found 1 Uses of fossils . 1 How fossils are found 1 Where and how to collect 2 Kinds of fossil preservation 2 How fossils are named . 3 Classification and identification 4 Use of keys 4 Technical terms . 5 Name changes . 5 Cleaning and preparation 5 Cataloguing . 6 Basic references 6 Chapter 2. The story of Ohio's rocks 8 General . 8 Classification of Ohio's rocks . 13 Pre-Cambrian time: the beginning 13 Cambrian time: the age of trilobites 14 Ordovician time: the age of bryozoan reefs 14 Silurian time: the rise of the corals . 17 Devonian time: the rise of the fishes . 19 Mississippian time: the great sandy deltas 21 Pennsylvanian time: the coal forests 23 Permian time: the end of the seas in Ohio 26 The great gap in the record 26 Pleistocene time: the glaciers 26 Chapter 3. The main kinds of fossils 29 The Plant Kingdom . 29 General ..... 29 Phylum Thallophyta 29 Phylum Bryophyta 30 Phylum Pteridophyta 30 Phylum Arthrophyta 31 Phylum Lepidophyta 31 Phylum Pteridospermophyta 31 Phylum Cycadophyta 31 Phylum Coniferophyta 32 Phylum Angiospermophyta 32 The Animal Kingdom 32 General ...
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Columbus Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE COLUMBUS QUADRANGLE. By Gr. D. Hiibbard, C. R. Stauffer, J. A. Bownoeker, C. S. Prosser, and E. R. Cumings.1 INTRODUCTION. all the northern and western parts, as shown in figure 7 (p. 10), between the two drainage basins is rather level and incon­ having been glaciated. In Ohio, however, as in Pennsylvania spicuous and nearly everywhere lies close to the boundary GENERAL RELATIONS. and New York, this line does not coincide with any preglacial between the plain and plateau, but several short streams rise The Columbus quadrangle is bounded by parallels 39° 45' physiographic boundary. on the plateau and flow out through gaps in the escarpment and 40° 15' and by meridians 82° 45' and 83° 15' and com­ to the plain. prises the Dublin, Westerville, West Columbus, and East The plateau as a whole is well drained and contains few Columbus 15-minute quadrangles, an area of 915.25 square lakes and swamps except near the divide, where the drainage miles. It is in central Ohio (see fig. 1) and includes nearly is not so good and swamps are more abundant. The narrow all of Franklin County and parts of Union, Delaware, Lick­ belt of the Erie Plain in the northeastern part of the State is ing, Fairfield, Pickaway, and Madison counties. The city of also well drained, but in the broad, nearly level area in the Columbus is in the center of the quadrangle. northwestern part the drainage is somewhat obstructed by glacial deposits and there are several small lakes and many swamps, though swamps are not so numerous as they were before the region was settled and cultivated.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lower Carboniferous) Corals (Subclasses Rugosa, Tabulata) Preserved in an Urban Environment, Leiden, the Netherlands Dimmy M
    Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 44 (2018), p. 39–50, 7 figs. © 2018, Mizunami Fossil Museum Provenance, systematics and palaeoecology of Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) corals (subclasses Rugosa, Tabulata) preserved in an urban environment, Leiden, the Netherlands Dimmy M. van Ruiten* and Stephen K. Donovan** *Bachstraat 19, 2324 GJ Leiden, the Netherlands *Taxonomy and Systematics Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands <[email protected]> Abstract There are few sites in The Netherlands where the pre-Pleistocene rock and fossil records can be examined in situ. In the city of Leiden, Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) limestones used as building stones expose diverse invertebrate fossils, principally brachiopods, fenestrate bryozoans, crinoid columnals, molluscs and corals. This study focuses on the corals, which belong to the subclasses Rugosa and Tabulata. The aim of the research was to determine the biodiversity of fossil corals in the city of Leiden and any associated palaeoecological signals. Two street surveys were made through Leiden and a database of pictures was built up. The corals were then identified using published keys and literature. Research and identification revealed four genera, namely Michelinia, Syringopora, Zaphrentites and Siphonodendron. Most were common, but Siphonodendron was only encountered once in this study, and may be from a different locality and horizon from the other corals. The other genera were compared with literature on coral faunas and it is concluded that the limestones are from the Late Tournaisian Ourthe Formation in Belgium. Key words: Michelinia, Syringopora, Zaphrentites, Siphonodendron, Tournaisian, Ourthe Formation Introduction section using published keys (e.g., Anonymous, 1969; Mitchell, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text -.: Palaeontologia Polonica
    ome I, 1929 No. 24, 1970 No. 25, 1971 POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF PALEOBIOLOGY PALAEONTOLOGIA POLONICA-No. 51, 1991 LATE CARBONIFEROUS TO EARLY PERMIAN TABULATA FROM SPITSBERGEN (TABULATA Z P6ZNEGO KARBONU I WCZESN EGO PERMU SPITSBERGENU) by ALEKSANDER NOWINSKI (WITH 23 TEXT-FIGURES, 4 TABLES AND 23 PLATES WARSZAWA-KRAK6w 1991 WYDAWNICTWO NAUKOWE PWN REDAKTOR - EDITOR J6ZEF KAZMIERCZAK ZASTI;PCA REDAKTORA - ASSISTANT EDITOR MAGDALENA BORSUK-BIALYNICKA Adres Red akc]i - Address of the Editorial Office Instytut Paleobiologii Polska Akadernia Nauk 02·0 89 Warszawa , AI. :Zwirki i Wigu ry 93 KOREKTA Zesp61 Copyright © by Wydawnietwo Naukowe PWN Sp. z 0 .0. Warszawa - Krak6w 1991 ISBN 83-01-09860-0 ISSN 0078-8562 Wydawnietwo Naukowe PWN - Oddzial w Krakowic Wydanie I. Naklad 490 + 65 egz. Ark . wyd. 11,75. Ark . druk. 9'/.+23 wkladki. Pap ier offset. sa t. III kl ., 120 g, 61 x 86. Oddano do skladania we wrzesniu 19R9 r. Podpisano do druku w grudniu 1991 r. Druk ukon­ czono w styczniu 1992 r. Zarn .482/ 89 Drukarn ia Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego w Kr akow ie ALEKSANDER NOWINSKI LATE CARBONIFEROUS TO EARLY PERMIAN TABULATA FROM SPITSBERGEN NOWINSKI, A.: Late Carboniferous to early Permian Tabul ata from Spitsbergen, Palaeont. Polonica, 51, 3- 74, 1991. Twenty four species of Tabul ata (including 13 new species and two species determined only at generic level) are described and illustrated. The new species are : Roemeripora media sp, n., R . hornsundensis sp, n., Syringopora stuckenbergi sp. n., S. kruseryggen­ sis sp. n., Neosyringopora spitsbergensis sp. n., Hayasakaia multispinosa sp. n., H . birkenmajeri sp.
    [Show full text]