1 Perceptions of Armed Policing: Barriers and Motivations To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Perceptions of Armed Policing: Barriers and Motivations To Perceptions of Armed Policing: Barriers and motivations to becoming an Authorised Firearms Officer by Joe Simon Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted for the degree of MSc by Research 2019 1 Abstract Police constabularies in England and Wales are under increased scrutiny to ensure diversity and representation across all aspects of policing business. Armed policing, however, has historically been understood as an exclusive, highly masculine and dangerous enterprise. This research examined police officers’ perceptions of the motivations and barriers to becoming and Authorised Firearms Officer (AFO). Based on a survey of 287 respondents, this research found that there was little difference between males and females on the value placed on gendered nature and aspects of the AFO role. However, findings also reveal enduring perceptions of firearms units are inaccessible, the work characterised in terms of threat, risk and dangerousness. For many underrepresented groups therefore, this leads to a sense of feeling unwelcome in firearms units. In order to improve perceptions of firearms as a policing activity, and the diversity within firearms units, police constabularies should seek to ensure that these units improve accessibility and inclusivity in addition to being cognisant of the impact that culture continues to have on the ability to recruit. 2 Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the advice and support of a number of people to whom I am extremely thankful. Firstly, I am especially grateful to the officers and staff who gave up time from their busy working lives to help facilitate and support this research. Secondly, to my supervisor Professor Robin Bryant, who has given endlessly of his time in guiding me through this process. I have been pushed to explore and understand new concepts and have learned much that will benefit me both personally and professionally, and for that I am most grateful. Finally, this work would not have been possible without the support of my friends and family. I especially dedicate this to my parents who have seen me start and abandon so many things without seeing them through to conclusion. 3 Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 3 Chapter One: Introduction .............................................................................................. 8 History of armed policing in Great Britain ............................................................. 8 Routinely unarmed policing ....................................................................................................... 8 Developments in armed policing.............................................................................................. 9 Armed policing into the 21st Century ................................................................... 13 Routine Arming – The Debate ............................................................................... 15 Armed Policing Statistics – England and Wales ................................................... 15 Officer numbers .............................................................................................................................. 15 Firearms operations ..................................................................................................................... 16 Discharges of police firearms ................................................................................................... 16 Chapter Two: An Overview of Police Culture .......................................................... 17 Organisational culture........................................................................................... 17 Police occupational culture ................................................................................... 17 Police culture as a negative ................................................................................... 18 Reforming police culture....................................................................................... 18 Police ‘cultures’ ..................................................................................................... 20 Police culture and armed policing ........................................................................ 21 Cult of masculinity ......................................................................................................................... 21 Action, excitement and danger ................................................................................................ 22 ‘Good’ quality work ....................................................................................................................... 22 Orientation to work, job satisfaction and policing......................................................... 23 Job satisfaction ................................................................................................................................ 24 Motivations and policing ....................................................................................... 24 Police culture in the 21st Century ......................................................................... 25 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 26 Chapter Three: Methods ............................................................................................... 27 The Research Topic ................................................................................................. 27 Research Aims ........................................................................................................ 28 Researcher Situatedness ......................................................................................... 28 Research Design .................................................................................................... 30 Research Methods ......................................................................................................................... 30 The Research Site .................................................................................................... 32 4 Site Selection .................................................................................................................................... 33 Research Sample ................................................................................................... 34 Sample Selection ............................................................................................................................ 35 Questionnaire Construction .................................................................................. 36 Question Selection ......................................................................................................................... 38 The Likert Scale .............................................................................................................................. 38 Question Development ................................................................................................................ 40 The Bem Sex-Role Inventory .................................................................................................... 42 Questionnaire Testing ........................................................................................... 45 Analysis ................................................................................................................. 46 Reliability and Validity ................................................................................................................ 46 Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient (a) ............................................................................................ 47 Data Types and Measurement ................................................................................................. 50 Chi-squared test for association (χ2) .................................................................................... 51 Mann-Whitney U test ................................................................................................................... 52 Indication of direction in the event of association......................................................... 53 Ethical Considerations .......................................................................................... 54 Informed Consent .......................................................................................................................... 55 Confidentiality and Anonymity ............................................................................................... 57 Professional ethical challenges ............................................................................................... 58 Chapter Four: Findings ................................................................................................. 60 The research sample demographic ....................................................................... 60 Sample by gender........................................................................................................................... 60 Sample by AFO/Non-AFO status ............................................................................................ 62 Views on armed policing ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Shaken, Not Stunned
    Shaken, not stunned: The London Bombings of July 2005 1 Work in progress – not for circulation or citation! Project leader: Dr. Eric K Stern Case researchers: Fredrik Fors Lindy M Newlove Edward Deverell 1 This research has been made possible by the support of the Swedish National Defence College, the Swedish Emergency Management Agency and the Critical Incident Analysis Group. 1 Executive summary - The bombings of July 2005 On July 7 th , the morning rush hours in London formed the backdrop for the first suicide bombings in Western Europe in modern times. Three different parts of the London subway system were attacked around 08.50: Aldgate, Edgware Road, and Russell Square. 2 The three Tube trains were all hit within 50 seconds time. A bomb on the upper floor of a double-decker bus at Tavistock Square was detonated at 09.47. In the terrorist attacks, four suicide bombers detonated one charge each, killing 52 people. Seven people were killed by the blasts at Aldgate, six at Edgware Road, 13 at Tavistock Square, and 26 at Russel Square – in addition to the suicide bombers themselves. More than 700 people were injured. Hundreds of rescue workers were engaged in coping with the aftermath. Over 200 staff from the London Fire Brigade, 450 staff and 186 vehicles from the London Ambulance Service, several hundred police officers from the Metropolitan Police and from the City of London Police, as well as over 130 staff from the British Transport Police were involved. Patients were sent to 7 area hospitals. 3 Crucial Decision Problems 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST Please Confirm Below the Summary of Chronology Into The
    REQUEST Please confirm below the summary of chronology into the Stockwell enquiry to be correct that Parliament, MOPAC does hold information relating to his request. I draw your attention to the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 section 42, 48 and Police Act 1996 section 50- Appointment of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis. 22 July 2005 00:50hrs Review of CCTV images takes place from the four scenes. 01:00hrs Commander Cressida DICK woken at home requesting she attends NSY at 07:00hrs the following morning to be a KRATOS commander. 02:15hrs Intelligence recovered from rucksack left by suspect in area of SHEPHERDS BUSH. Gym club card gives name of Mr Hussain OSMAN, enquiries made earlier give address for OSMAN as 21 SCOTIA ROAD. 04:20hrs Commander MCDOWALL compares photos from gym to the CCTV images from the attempted bombings. good likeness for attempted bombing at SHEPHERDS BUSH. Covert sweep requested for SCOTIA ROAD. Vehicle which is linked to suspects later found in the vicinity. 04:55hrs Commander MCDOWALL makes and records decision to mount directed surveillance at SCOTIA ROAD address. Gold firearms strategy set, and DSO confirmed for potential operation KRATOS, this being Commander Cressida DICK. 05:00hrs Commander DICK arrives at NSY. 05:15hrs Tango 1, Surveillance (Red team) leader receives briefing from 'Alan'. 05:40hrs Tango 1 briefs red team on operation. 05:45hrs Authorisation given for Surveillance personnel to carry firearms for their own protection and the protection of the public. 06:00hrs RIPA Authorisation for directed surveillance on suspects obtained. 06:04hrs Observation Point commenced at SCOTIA ROAD.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Sussex Police and Crime Panel, 05/10/2018 10:30
    Public Document Pack Sussex Police and Crime Panel Members are hereby requested to attend the meeting of the Sussex Police and Crime Panel, to be held at 10.30 am on Friday, 5 October 2018 at County Hall, Lewes. Tony Kershaw Clerk to the Police and Crime Panel 27 September 2018 Webcasting Notice Please note: This meeting will be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via East Sussex County Council’s website on the internet – at the start of the meeting the Chairman will confirm that the meeting is to be filmed. Generally the public gallery is not filmed. However, by entering the meeting room and using the public seating area you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings for webcasting and/or training purposes. The webcast will be available via the link below: http://www.eastsussex.public-i.tv/core/. Agenda 10.30 am 1. Declarations of Interest Members and officers must declare any pecuniary or personal interest in any business on the agenda. They should also make declarations at any stage such an interest becomes apparent during the meeting. Consideration should be given to leaving the meeting if the nature of the interest warrants it. If in doubt contact Democratic Services, West Sussex County Council, before the meeting. 10.35 am 2. Minutes (Pages 5 - 16) To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting on 29 June (cream paper). 10.40 am 3. Urgent Matters Items not on the agenda which the Chairman of the meeting is of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Organizing to Counter Terrorism: Sensemaking Amidst Dynamic
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Organizing to counter terrorism: sensemaking amidst dynamic complexity AUTHORS Colville, Ian; Pye, Annie; Carter, Mike JOURNAL Human Relations DEPOSITED IN ORE 02 June 2014 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/14946 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Organizing to Counter Terrorism: Sensemaking amidst dynamic complexity By Ian Colville, University of Bath, [email protected] Annie Pye, University of Exeter [email protected] & Mike Carter, University of Exeter [email protected] Corresponding author: Annie Pye, Centre for Leadership Studies, University of Exeter Business School, Streatham Court, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4PU, UK. Version 1 of the manuscript which was subsequently published in Human Relations (2013: 66(9) 1201–1223). This paper was subsequently awarded the Human Relations 2013 Paper of the Year Award which is “given to the article that the Editorial Team considers best encapsulates broad readership appeal, sound methods, and whose theory advances our understanding of human relations at work”. Abstract Organizations increasingly find themselves contending with circumstances that are suffused with dynamic complexity. So how do they make sense of and contend with this? Using a sensemaking approach, our empirical case analysis of the shooting of Mr Jean Charles de Menezes shows how sensemaking is tested under such conditions. Through elaborating the relationship between the concepts of frames and cues, we find that the introduction of a new organizational routine to anticipate action in changing circumstances leads to discrepant sensemaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Police
    WEST MIDLANDS POLICE JOB DESCRIPTION POST TITLE: Chief Firearms Instructor Band E LPU/DEPARTMENT: Operations Firearms Unit RESPONSIBLE TO: Chief Superintendent Operations Department RESPONSIBLE FOR: Sergeant, Constable and Police Staff Firearms Instructors; Business Support Manager; Armourer. AIM OF JOB: Management of the Firearms Training Unit in WMP. Management of training for all AFOs & Firearms Commanders VETTING LEVEL: SC level MAIN DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES MANAGING STAFF ▪ Manage and develop staff within the unit. ▪ Manage Policy Compliance Unit. ▪ Maintain an awareness of staff welfare needs. ▪ Monitor the supervision of officers and police staff receiving training. ▪ Monitor the delivery of training. ▪ Manage staff performance ,ensuring that annual and interim meetings take place and objectives are agreed and actioned. ▪ Identify strengths, weaknesses and training needs. ▪ Implement and monitor the West Midlands Police Equal Opportunities Policy with regard to managing staff and provision of services. 1 | P a g e Version 1.2 April 2015 ADMINISTRATION ▪ To oversee the collation and production of performance and statistical returns. ▪ To be responsible for the management of devolved budgets. ▪ To represent the force at local, regional and national conferences where applicable to the post holder ▪ To provide reports and comprehensive working papers including making recommendations for improvements or amendments to systems within the department. ▪ Plan and prepare annual Firearms Training plan. ▪ Ensure compliance with College of Policing Firearms Training Licensing requirements and submission of annual Quality Assurance Management Systems documentation. ▪ Evaluate all firearms refresher training. Signing of all Risk Assessments. ▪ Evaluate all firearm training - new learning ▪ Process paper work and maintain records of training given utilising computer data base system JML Chronicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 66 February 23, 2021 Opus 2
    Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 66 February 23, 2021 Opus 2 - Official Court Reporters Phone: +44 (0)20 3008 5900 Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.opus2.com February 23, 2021 Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 66 1 Tuesday, 23 February 2021 1 the coming into effect of that plan in July 2012? 2 (10.15 am) 2 A. I was, yes. 3 MR GREANEY: Sir, good morning. I’m sorry we are starting 3 Q. Still dealing with matters of background, in 2012 when 4 a few minutes later than even the delayed start today; 4 you joined the unit, how many inspectors were there 5 there was a good reason for that. The gentleman in the 5 in the firearms unit? 6 witness box is someone that we heard a good deal about 6 A. There were eight in total , sir . 7 yesterday, it ’s Inspector Simon Lear, and I will ask 7 Q. Sir, for your information, I ’m in the first statement of 8 that he be sworn by Andrew, please. 8 Inspector Lear at paragraph 2. 9 INSPECTOR SIMON LEAR (sworn) 9 So there were eight inspectors? 10 Questions from MR GREANEY 10 A. Yes. 11 MR GREANEY: Would you begin, please, by telling us what 11 Q. Over time, was there any impact upon the number of 12 your full name is? 12 inspectors within the unit? 13 A. Simon Andrew Lear. 13 A. Over the next couple of years, sir , it went down from 14 Q. Are you an inspector with Greater Manchester Police? 14 eight to five and then finished at three.
    [Show full text]
  • Devon and Cornwall Police Guidelines
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED DEVON & CORNWALL C O N S T A B U L A R Y Force Policy & Procedure Guideline POLICE USE OF FIREARMS: POLICY AND OPERATIONAL Reference Number D83 Policy Version Date 15 July 2005 Review Date 1 May 2006 Policy Ownership: Crime Department Portfolio Holder: Assistant Chief Constable (O) Links or overlaps with other policies: D73 Negotiators D84 Police Use of Firearms : Training D144 Police Dogs & their use D147 TPAC D241 Post Incident Procedures (Firearms) D242 Use of Handheld Digital Recorders DEVON & CORNWALL CONSTABULARY POLICY & PROCEDURES D83 POLICE USE OF FIREARMS: POLICY AND OPERATIONAL VERSION DATED 15/07/05 1.0 POLICY IDENTIFICATION 1.1 This policy has been drafted in accordance with the principles of Human Rights legislation, Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 and Freedom of Information Act 2000. Public disclosure is approved unless where otherwise indicated and justified by relevant exemptions. 15/07/05 Force Publication Scheme NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 2.0 POLICY STATEMENTS/INTENTIONS (FOIA – OPEN) 2.1 This guideline outlines the Firearms Strategy for the Devon & Cornwall Constabulary. It sets out how and by whom the strategy will be delivered as well as giving guidance on specific operational circumstances. 3.0 INTRODUCTION (FOIA – OPEN) 3.1 It is the policy of the Devon & Cornwall Constabulary, at all incidents involving the police use of firearms to comply with the guidelines detailed in the ACPO Manual of Guidance on the Police Use of Firearms. 3.2 In keeping with the Manual of Guidance, the underlying principle for the interpretation of this guideline should be the application of common sense, reinforced by teamwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Irreversible Consequences: Racial Profiling and Lethal Force in the “War on Terror”
    IRREVERSIBLE CONSEQUENCES: RACIAL PROFILING AND LETHAL FORCE IN THE “WAR ON TERROR” Briefing Paper The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice New York University School of Law May 2006 © 2006 CHRGJ, NYU School of Law New York, NY About the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) at NYU School of Law (http://www.chrgj.org) focuses on issues related to “global justice,” and aims to advance human rights and respect for the rule of law through cutting-edge advocacy and scholarship. The CHRGJ promotes human rights research, education and training, and encourages interdisciplinary research on emerging issues in international human rights and humanitarian law. Philip Alston is the Center’s Faculty Chair; Smita Narula and Meg Satterthwaite are Faculty Co-Directors; and Jayne Huckerby is Research Director. This report should be cited as: Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, Irreversible Consequences: Racial Profiling and Lethal Force in the “War on Terror” (New York: NYU School of Law, 2006). About this Briefing Paper This Briefing Paper is the most recent in a series of Briefing Papers that addresses human rights violations in the “War on Terror.” This Briefing Paper is available at: www.chrgj.org. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at NYU School of Law is enormously grateful to the following individuals for their work and/or assistance in the preparation of this Report: Project Directors: Smita Narula, Assistant Professor of Clinical Law, NYU School of Law; Faculty Director, Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, NYU School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Must Inform Officer Immediately: NO Connecticut CCW Links May Issue (See Must Inform Section)
    Connecticut Must Inform Officer Immediately: NO Connecticut May Issue (See Must Inform Section) CCW Links State CCW Site State Firearm Laws Summary of State Firearm Laws (From OLF 1/31/2020) Instructions to Applicants CT Certified Instructors State Firearm FAQs Hunting Gun Laws FAQs State Statutes State Admin Rules Firearms & CCW Brochure 11/17 Note: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, State Attorney General Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Secretary of State Wyoming have "Permitless Carry". Anyone who can legally possess a firearm may carry in these states without a Permit/License. Check each Age to Carry a Firearm In Other States states page for information on age and other restrictions that may apply. North Dakota has “Permitless Carry” for Residents only. Last Updated: 9/1/2021 Permits/Licenses This State Honors Listed Below Connecticut does not honor any other states Permit/Licenses. Though Connecticut law states “May Issue” Connecticut operates more like a “Shall Issue” state if you meet all the requirements. Connecticut also is “Shall Issue” for Non Residents if you meet the qualifications. Notice: CT just passed very restrictive gun laws. CT residents and anyone planning on carrying in CT should read the Bill. Also read the “Chemical Sprays/Stun Gun/Higher Capacity Magazine Laws” section below. You can read OLR’s Bill Analysis of SB1160 by going Here. How to Apply for a Permit Residents You must go to the Police Department or First Selectman of the town and get the application. Not available online.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. PAM Minutes
    19 July 2019 PERFORMANCE & ACCOUNTABILITY MEETING DATE: 19 July 2019 LOCATION: Office of the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner, Sackville House, Lewes PRESENT: Police & Crime Commissioner – Katy Bourne (KB) Chief Executive Officer – Mark Streater (MS) Deputy Chief Constable – Jo Shiner (JS) Assistant Chief Constable – Dave Miller (DM) Communications Manager – Natalie McFall (audio recording) Head of Performance – Graham Kane (retrospective minutes) POLICE OFFICER AND PCSO RECRUITMENT UPDATE Earlier this year, I asked local people to help fund 250 more police officers, 100 more Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) and 50 more specialist police staff – a total increase of 400 officers and staff compared to last year. A. How is this recruitment progressing? B. What is Sussex Police doing to ensure that serving police officers, staff and PCSOs understand the increases that the Force is working to achieve? JS confirmed that recruitment is progressing “really well” and stated that the Force is “on track” to achieve the additional police officers, PCSOs and specialist staff by March 2023. Sussex Police had an intake of 72 police officers in July 2019 who will be posted to the policing divisions in October for tutoring ahead of them achieving Independent Patrol in January 2020. Further intakes of 24 and 72 are planned in December 2019 and March 2020, respectively. Another 13 individuals have been recruited through the ‘Police Now – National Graduate Leadership Programme’ and will be in Force from early September 2019. The Deputy Chief Constable reflected positively on the most recent police officer recruitment campaign that opened in June 2019. A total of 1,073 applications were received from a diverse range of applicants including: more than 40% from female applicants; approximately 10% identifying themselves as bisexual, gay or lesbian and circa 6% of candidates declaring their ethnicity as Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic.
    [Show full text]
  • 310 Firearms
    Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake Law Enforcement Policy Manual Firearms Policy Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake Law Enforcement Policy Manual 310 Firearms 310.1 FIREARMS PURPOSE AND SCOPE This policy provides guidelines for Department-approved firearms, the safe and legal carrying of firearms, firearms maintenance, and firearms training. This policy does not apply to issues related to the use of firearms that are addressed in the Use of Force or Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths policies. This policy only applies to those members who are authorized to carry firearms. 310.2 FIREARMS POLICY The Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake (UPD) will equip its members with firearms to address the risks posed to the public and department members by violent and sometimes well- armed persons. The Department will ensure firearms are appropriate and in good working order and that relevant training is provided. 310.3 ON-DUTY FIREARMS Officers shall be armed at all times with an approved primary duty pistol while on duty, except: A. When entering a jail, prison, or other secure building or area. B. When excused due to the nature of an assignment. C. When excused by the Sheriff or Division Commander/Administrator. 310.4 OFF-DUTY WEAPONS AVAILABILITY Full Time off-duty officers will always have an authorized firearm readily available. However, an off-duty officer may be in many situations when the carrying of a firearm is impractical, imprudent, or impossible. Satisfying the requirement to have a firearm “readily available” will depend upon the situation, activity, and location of the officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide on Firearms Licensing Law
    Guide on Firearms Licensing Law October 2014 Contents Ministerial foreword 1. An overview – frequently asked questions on firearms licensing .......................................... 5 2. Definition and classification of firearms and ammunition ...................................................... 8 3. Prohibited weapons and ammunition .................................................................................. 19 4. Expanding ammunition ........................................................................................................ 29 5. Restrictions on the possession, handling and distribution of firearms and ammunition .... 31 6. Exemptions from the requirement to hold a certificate ....................................................... 38 7. Young persons ..................................................................................................................... 49 8. Antique firearms ................................................................................................................... 55 9. Historic handguns ................................................................................................................ 58 10. Firearm certificate procedure ............................................................................................... 71 11. Shotgun certificate procedure ............................................................................................. 85 12. Assessing suitability ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]