Politcal Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Politcal Science Politcal Science Do Terrorist Beheadings Infuence American Public Opinion? Sponsoring Faculty Member: Dr. John Tures Researchers and Presenters: Lindsey Weathers, Erin Missroon, Sean Greer, Bre’Lan Simpson Addition Researchers: Jarred Adams, Montrell Brown, Braxton Ford, Jefrey Garner, Jamarkis Holmes, Duncan Parker, Mark Wagner Introduction At the end of Summer 2014, Americans were shocked to see the tele- vised execution of a pair of American journalists in Syria by a group known as ISIS. Both were killed in gruesome beheadings. The images seen on main- stream media sites, and on websites, bore an eerie resemblance to beheadings ten years earlier in Iraq. During the U.S. occupation, nearly a dozen Americans were beheaded, while Iraqis and people from a variety of countries were dis- patched in a similar manner. Analysts still question the purpose of the videos of 2004 and 2014. Were they designed to inspire locals to join the cause of those responsible for the killings? Were they designed to intimidate the Americans and coalition members, getting the public demand their leaders withdraw from the region? Or was it some combination of the two ideas? It is difcult to assess the former. But we can see whether the behead- ings had any infuence upon American public opinion. Did they make Ameri- cans want to withdraw from the Middle East? And did the beheadings afect the way Americans view Islam? To determine answers to these questions, we look to the literature for theories about U.S. public opinion, as well as infuences upon it. We look at whether these beheadings have had an infuence on survey data of Americans across the last dozen years. Beheading Cases Daniel Pearl Due to the recent beheadings done by the ISIS group, the memory of the 2002 horror of American Journalist Daniel Pearl’s decapitation resurfaced. ISIS, which is the newly formed terrorist group based in Syria, very closely emu- lates the early 2000s practices of the al-Qaeda group. Although ISIS is recreat- 168 Political Science ing the act of beheading and despite popular opinion, “A statement posted on jihadist forums Sunday…and purportedly issued by al-Qaeda’s General Com- mand said ‘It has no connection with the group’ and blamed it for ‘the enormity of the disaster that aficted the Jihad in Syria (CNN 2014).’” Al-Qaeda released gruesome viral videos starting with the beheading of Daniel Pearl. Qari Hashim was accused of Daniel Pearl’s murder but was ac- quitted by the court on Friday, October 24, 2014. He was detained again un- der the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) rules one day after being acquit- ted. Three other men were sentenced to life terms. In addition to these men, Omar Saeed Sheikh, who was said to be the “mastermind” behind Pearl’s be- heading (BBC News 2014), was sentenced to death. Nick Berg Nick Berg, a 26-year-old young man that from Pennsylvania, was kid- napped by a group of al-Qaeda terrorists. It is believed he was executed by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who was behind several bombings in Iraq. The execution was recorded and posted on an Islamic website and it immediately went viral and people all over the United States watched it. According to Fox News, in the video that was recorded of Nick Berg being beheaded, there were fve men wearing scarves around their heads with black ski masks standing behind a man that was on the foor in an all-orange jumpsuit that looked just like a prisoners uniform. The video shows the prisoner saying “My name is Nick Berg, my father’s name is Michael, my mother’s name is Susan. I have a brother and a sister, David and Sarah. I live in Philadelphia.” The video shows him on the foor with his hands behind his back, and then there was a statement that was made that was read in Arabic. Then, one of the men behind him takes a large knife from under his clothes, while one of the other men takes Berg on his side. After that, the men take the knife to Berg’s neck and thrust right through it. After they cut his head of, they hold Berg’s head before the camera. Right before they thrust the knife through him, there was a phrase that was repeatedly shouted. This statement that they were screaming was,” Al- lahu Akbar!” This is translated from Islamic meaning, ”God is great.” Berg’s body was found on a Baghdad highway on the same day that he was beheaded, U.S. ofcials say. (Fox News 2004a) A former United States Navy Judge Advocate General, Tim Susanin, told Fox News, ”To see this poor soul beheaded is gruesome and barbaric. We are really seeing the difculty that our troops are dealing with. They have now been infltrated by members of Al-Qaeda (Fox News, 2004a).” Michael Berg, Nick’s father, said, “I knew he was decapitated. That manner is preferable to a long and torturous death. But I didn’t want it to become public.” The Bush Administration said those who beheaded Berg would be hunted down and brought to justice. 169 Owen Eugene Armstrong and Jack Hensley In addition to kidnappings, murders, suicide bombing attacks, and other acts of terrorism in Iraq, Al-Zarqawi was also accused of beheading two Americans: Owen Eugene Armstrong and Jack Hensley. Al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, released an audiotape demanding his Mujuhadeen fghters in Iraq to battle in a holy war. Soon after- wards, he was linked to a car bombing attack on the Jordanian embassy. Two weeks later he bombed the United Nations ofce in Baghdad (Faraj et.al. 2004). Jack Hensley was beheaded on September 21, 2004. On that day, a video showed the kidnappers beheading Hensley, an American worker from Marietta, Georgia. The 49-year-old was a contractor in Iraq (Fox News 2004b). The following day, Owen Eugene “Jack” Armstrong, the second of three men kidnapped, was beheaded and videotaped after a trade for Iraqi female prison- ers broke down (Fox News 2004c). The third man, a Briton, was also killed. James Foley James Foley was a writer for GlobalPost; he also made videos for other shows, including the PBS show NewsHour. He truly believed that war was hor- rible and he stood by that. He tried to show the world this with his report “hu- manity amid the horror of war (Stelter 2014a).” Foley was abducted while on a reporting trip to Northern Syria in 2012. Later there was a video posted on August 19, 2014 that showed his loved ones and the rest of this country what happened to him (Carter, 2014). “We have seen a video that purports to be the murder of U.S. citizen James Foley by (ISIS),” National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said. “The intelligence community is working as quickly as possible to determine its authenticity. If genuine, we are appalled by the brutal murder of an innocent American jour- nalist and we express our deepest condolences to his family and friends (Carter 2014).” Steven Sotlof Steven Sotlof was a 31-year old freelance journalist who wrote for multiple publications and reported for many Middle Eastern countries. Sotlof was abducted in 2013 in Northern Syria. It is believed the abduction happened near the city of Aleppo; he was then imprisoned by the “Islamic State” (ISIS) at the location of Raqqa. About a year later on September 2, Sotlof was behead- ed by the jihadist group ISIS, this made Sotlof the second American journalist to be killed by ISIS. Sotlof, who was Jewish, was a dual citizen of the United States and Is- rael. He studied journalism at the University of Central Florida. An article by BBC said “Steven Sotlof… was described as an honest and courageous journalist… He often focused on the human side of the confict, writing about the plight of 170 Political Science displaced civilians in Syria struggling without adequate food or shelter in early 2013 (BBC 2014).” Now we know something about the cases of beheadings, designed to rally supporters and intimidate opponents. But what we need to understand is how these killings ft within the academic literature. What do we know about American public opinion, and the role of international events for infuencing it? And how have beheadings played a role in this crisis, or any crisis? Literature Review Foreign Policy & Public Opinion Many questions around the world surround what is the primary role of public opinion when talking about foreign policy. Holsti stated that “the center of persisting debates [is] between the liberal-democratic and realist approach- es to foreign afairs (Holsti 1992, 440).” Holsti also stated that there is a long liberal-democratic tradition, dating back at least to Kant and Bentham; the for- eign policies of democratic countries are more peaceful, in part because the public can play a constructive role in constraining policy makers. The question that everyone really wants to know is do people of the world really have a clear idea of foreign policy, for them to be able to listen to someone talk about it, and maybe even hold a conversation about it? Some people don’t always think that public opinion is important; they would rather hear about who was stuck on the side of the road than hear about something that could potentially afect their lives. According to Hans Morgenthau (1978) “public opinion is a barrier, to thoughtful and coherent diplomacy, hindering eforts to promote national interest that transcend the moods and passions of moment.” Holsti (1992 440) stated that most realists would distinguish between foreign policy and other public policy issues.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. Citizens Kidnapped by the Islamic State John W
    CRS Insights U.S. Citizens Kidnapped by the Islamic State John W. Rollins, Specialist in Terrorism and National Security ([email protected], 7-5529) Liana Rosen, Specialist in International Crime and Narcotics ([email protected], 7-6177) February 13, 2015 (IN10167) Overview On February 10, 2015, President Barack Obama acknowledged that U.S. citizen Kayla Mueller was killed while held in captivity by the terrorist group known as the Islamic State (IS). This was the fourth death of an American taken hostage by the Islamic State: Abdul-Rahman Kassig (previously Peter Kassig), James Foley, and Steven Sotloff were also killed. The death of Mueller and the graphic videos depicting the deaths of the other three Americans have generated debate about the U.S. government's role and capabilities for freeing hostages. In light of these deaths, some policymakers have called for a reevaluation of U.S. policy on international kidnapping responses. Questions include whether it is effective and properly coordinated and implemented, should be abandoned or modified to allow for exceptions and flexibility, or could benefit from enhancements to improve global adherence. Scope The killing of U.S. citizens by the Islamic State may be driven by a variety of underlying motives. Reports describe the group as inclined toward graphic and public forms of violence for purposes of intimidation and recruitment. It is unclear whether the Islamic State would have released its Americans hostages in exchange for ransom payments or other concessions. Foley's family, for example, disclosed that the Islamic State demanded a ransom of 100 million euros ($132 million).
    [Show full text]
  • The James W. Foley Journalism Safety Modules
    The James W. Foley Journalism Safety Modules UPDATED: May 3, 2021 Developed in collaboration with the Marquette University Diederich College of Communication ii Contents Lessons for Undergraduate Journalism and Communications Programs: An Overview .........................1 Module 1: Introduction to Journalism Safety ......................................................................................2 BE SAFE (Before Everything Stop Assess Focus Enact) ............................................................................. 2 “Six months later, the Capital-Gazette shooting still resonates, among family, community, news industry” Jean Marbella, The Baltimore Sun ............................................................................................ 3 “Doing No Harm: The Call for Crime Reporting that Does Justice to the Beat” Natalie Yahr, Center for Journalism Ethics ...................................................................................................................................... 3 “We Need to Talk About the Dangers of Journalism” Melanie Pineda, Washington Square News......... 4 Module 2: Developing Safe Journalistic Habits ....................................................................................5 Risk Assessments for Journalists .............................................................................................................. 5 “For student journalists, the beats are the same but the protections are different” Stephanie Sugars, Freedom of the Press Foundation ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • After Foley Killing, US Defends Refusal to Pay Ransom To
    The Obama administration sharply defended its refusal to negotiate with or pay ransom to terrorist groups that kidnap, following the videotaped execution this week of American photojournalist James Foley by the Islamic State. “We believe that paying ransoms or making concessions would put all Americans overseas at greater risk” and would provide funding for groups whose capabilities “we are trying to degrade,” Marie Harf, a State Department spokeswoman, said in a briefing Thursday. Harf said it is illegal for any American citizen to pay ransom to a group, such as the Islamic State, that the U.S. government has designated as a terrorist organization. ADVERTISING In late 2013, more than a year after Foley was captured while reporting on Syria’s civil war, his family received several e-mails from the Islamic State, including one demanding 100 million Euros, about $133 million, for his freedom, according to GlobalPost, Foley’s employer. The amount, many times the ransom demanded for other Western hostages, indicated that the Islamic State was not serious about releasing Foley, U.S. officials said. His family and GlobalPost agreed, said Richard Byrne, the company’s vice president and director of communications. “I don’t think there was a negotiation,” he said. GlobalPost has said that it shared with federal officials all communications it received from the kidnappers, including a final e-mail last week saying they were about to execute Foley. Earlier this summer, U.S. Special Operations forces had tried to rescue Foley and three other Americans known to be held by the Islamic State. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Thursday described the raid — in which one U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Tanzim Qa'idat Al-Jihad Fi Bilad Al-Rafidayn
    Tanzim Qa'idat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn. Also known as: the al-Zarqawi network; al-Tawhid; Jama'at al-Tawhid wa'al-Jihad; Al-Tawhid and al-Jihad; The Monotheism and Jihad Group; Qaida of the Jihad in the Land of the Two rivers; Ai-Qa'ida of Jihad in the Land of the Two Rivers; Al-Qa'ida of Jihad Organization in the Land of the Two Rivers; The Organisation of Jihad's Base in the Country of the Two Rivers; The Organisation Base of Jihad/Country of the Two Rivers; The Organisation Base of Jihad/Mesopotamia; Tanzeem Qa'idat al- Jihad/Bilad al Raafidaini; Kateab al-Tawhid; Brigades of Tawhid; Unity and Jihad Group; Unity and Holy Struggle; Unity and Holy War. The following information is based on publicly available details about Tanzim Qa'idat al- Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn (TQJBR). These details have been corroborated by material from intelligence investigations into the activities of the TQJBR and by official reporting. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) assesses that the details set out below are accurate and reliable. TQJBR has been proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the United Nations and the United States Government. Background TQJBR is a Sunni Islamist extremist network established and led by Abu Mus'ab al- Zarqawi.1 The network first emerged as a loose-knit grouping of individuals and organisations under the leadership of al-Zarqawi over a period of several years, following his release from a Jordanian prison in 1999. On 24 April 2004 it was publicly proclaimed under the name Jama'at al-Tawhid wa'al-Jihad in an internet statement attributed to al-Zarqawi.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria Timeline 2011–2016
    Syria Timeline 2011–2016 COLOR KEY: ■ EVENTS IN SYRIA ■ HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST REPORTS ■ U.S. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS/STATEMENTS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 —— MARCH —— JANUARY 23 —— FEBRUARY 28 —— JANUARY-FEBRUARY —— FEBRUARY 17 —— FEBRUARY 1-FEBRUARY 3 Jabhat al-Nusra announces Enablers of the Syrian Conflict The first two rounds of peace talks attended The United States reaches an agreement with U.N.-mediated Syria peace talks begin in its formation as Syria’s —— MARCH 21 by the Syrian government and the National Turkey on training and arming Syrian rebels Geneva, but are swiftly suspended. official al-Qaeda affiliate. The United Nations investigates the possible use of chemical Opposition Coalition begin in Geneva. No fighting ISIS. —— FEBRUARY 22 progress is made. —— FEBRUARY 4 weapons in Syria. —— MAY 21 The United States and Russia announce that a Russia and China veto —— JUNE 13 —— FEBRUARY 10 ISIS takes control of Palmyra, a UNESCO World partial ceasefire in Syria will start on February a U.S.-backed U.N. Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes: “Our Addressing Barriers to the Resettlement of Heritage Site. 27. The ceasefire does not apply to attacks on Security Council resolution intelligence community assesses that the Assad regime has Vulnerable Syrian and Other Refugees —— SEPTEMBER 30 U.N.-designated terrorist organizations. condemning the violence used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on —— JUNE 3 Russia carries out its first airstrikes in Syria. Its —— FEBRUARY and calling for a political a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last President Assad wins elections in government- operations target the U.S.-supported non-ISIS The Syrian Refugee Crisis and the Need for transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H4628
    H4628 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 21, 2004 The ideology behind this is that Iraq in this last hour. And I appreciate the very important, very important. In the was the key to being able to move into discussion with my colleagues. And if 1990s Osama bin Laden in the Sudan Syria, being able to move into Iran, we have the time, I will be happy to had 13 terrorists training camps around that this is somehow a defense of the yield to them. It seems like we prob- Khartoum. Our intelligence agencies Likud version of what is in Israel’s in- ably will have the time. talked about that. The President and terest. The so-called neoconservatives There is no question, none at all, the NSC knew about that. And at that that are behind this ideological thrust that al-Qaeda and the Saddam Hussein time, we had an attack on the World have wanted this war for years. It is regime and people connected with that Trade Center because Osama bin not hidden. It is not a conspiracy. It is have met on numerous occasions. Laden’s minions tried to bring it down. not some kind of subterfuge. It is an There is no question that in May of That was in 1993. In 1996, we had the at- announced policy and possession philo- 2002, Zarqawi, one of the top lieuten- tack that killed a lot of Americans in sophically they have had for years. ants the senior al-Qaeda with bin Khobar Towers. In 1998, we had the at- The sad part is after Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Return to Raqqa
    RETURN TO RAQQA 80' - 2020 MEDIAWAN RIGHTS Produced by Minimal Films [email protected] RETURN TO RAQQA 0 2 SYNOPSIS “Return to Raqqa” chronicles what was perhaps the most famous kidnapping event in history , when 19 journalists were taken captive by the Islamic State, as told by one of its protagonists: Spanish reporter Marc Marginedas, who was also the first captive to be released. MARC MARGINEDAS Marc Marginedas is a journalist who was a correspondent for El Periódico de Catalunya for two decades. His activity as a war correspondent led him to cover the civil war in Algeria, the second Chechen war, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the civil war in Syria, among others. On 1 September 2013, Marginedas entered Syria accompanied by a group of opposition figures from the Free Syrian Army. It was his third visit to the country as a correspondent since the outbreak of the civil war in 2011. His main goal during this latest trip was to provide information on the preparations for a possible international military intervention that seemed very close. Three days later, on 4 September 2013, Marginedas was abducted near the city of Hama by ISIS jihadists. His captivity lasted almost six months, during which he shared a cell with some twenty journalists and aid workers from various countries. Two of these were James Foley and Steven Sotloff, colleagues who unfortunately did not share his fate. Marginedas was released in March 2014 and has not returned to Syrian territory since then. But he now feels the need to undertake this physical, cathartic journey to the house near Raqqa where he underwent the harshest experience of his life, an experience that he has practically chosen to forget over the past few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Medill Celebrates the Class of 2017 \
    MEDILL CELEBRATES THE CLASS OF 2017 \ OWNED MEDIA: THE FUTURE OF ADVERTISING? \ INSIDE PACIFIC STANDARD FALL 2017 \ ISSUE 97 \ ALUMNI MAGAZINE Associated Press reporter Hannah Dreier awarded 2016 James Foley Medill Medal for Courage in Journalism FORMER ASSOCIATED PRESS REPORTER of Advisers member Richard Stolley (BSJ52, Hannah Dreier is the recipient of the 2016 James MSJ53), former senior editorial adviser for Time Foley Medill Medal for Courage in Journalism Inc.; Chicago Tribune reporter and 2011 Medill for her coverage of the recurring turmoil in Medal for Courage in Journalism recipient David Venezuela. Dreier’s ongoing Associated Press Jackson; and Medill Professor Donna Leff (BSJ70, series, “Venezuela Undone,” chronicled the MSJ71), who has been a member of the faculty decline and its impact. She will visit Medill on and an associate of Northwestern’s Institute for Friday, Sept. 22 to speak to students and the NU Policy Research since 1980. community. Medill will begin accepting submissions for Now with ProPublica, Dreier was AP’s sole the 2017 Medill Foley Medal in February 2018. English-language correspondent in Venezuela Submissions must have a publishing date of 2017. and spent months in Caracas chronicling how TOP: Hannah Dreier, the 2016 James Foley Medill health care, food scarcity and education intersect Medal for Courage in Journalism Awardee. Photo to present frightening challenges for the people of credit: Carlos Becerra Venezuela. The selection committee included Medill Board EDITORIAL STAFF Meet our incoming freshman
    [Show full text]
  • Terror in the Name of Islam - Unholy War, Not Jihad Parvez Ahmed
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 39 Issue 3 2007-2008 2008 Terror in the Name of Islam - Unholy War, Not Jihad Parvez Ahmed Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Parvez Ahmed, Terror in the Name of Islam - Unholy War, Not Jihad, 39 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 759 (2008) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol39/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. TERROR IN THE NAME OF ISLAM-UNHOLY WAR, NOT JIHAD Parvez Ahmeaf t Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signi- fies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all, in any war, it is humanity hanging true sense. Under the1 cloud of threatening from a cross of iron. I. INTRODUCTION The objective of this paper is to (1) analyze current definitions of terrorism, (2) explore the history of recent terrorism committed in the name of Islam, (3) posit causal links between terrorism and the United States' (U.S.) Cold War programs and policies towards the Middle East, and (4) propose remedies to minimize and preferably eliminate the threat of terror- ism.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Evolving Insurgency
    CSIS _______________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775 -3270 Access: Web: CSIS.ORG Contact the Author: [email protected] Iraq’s Evolving Insurgency Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies With the Assistance of Patrick Baetjer Working Draft: Updated as of August 5, 2005 Please not e that this is part of a rough working draft of a CSIS book that will be published by Praeger in the fall of 2005. It is being circulated to solicit comments and additional data, and will be steadily revised and updated over time. Copyright CSIS, all rights reserved. All further dissemination and reproduction must be done with the written permission of the CSIS Cordesman: Iraq’s Evolving Insurgency 8/5/05 Page ii I. INTR ODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 1 SADDAM HUSSEIN ’S “P OWDER KEG ” ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 1 AMERICA ’S STRATEGIC MISTAKES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 2 AMERICA ’S STRATEGIC MISTAKES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 6 II. THE GROWTH AND C HARACTER OF THE INSURGENT THREA T ................................ ........ 9 DENIAL AS A METHOD OF COUNTER -INSURGENCY WARFARE ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 2021 No. 63 House of Representatives The House met at 7 p.m. and was purpose. May we in all that we encoun- A majority of the Committee did not agree called to order by the Speaker pro tem- ter this day and all days, have the faith to the appeals. pore (Ms. BARRAGA´ N). to proclaim, ‘‘the grass withers and the Sincerely, flowers fade, but the Word of our God THEODORE E. DEUTCH, f Chairman. endures forever.’’ JACKIE WALORSKI, DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER We pray in the strength of Your sov- Ranking Member. PRO TEMPORE ereign name. f The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- Amen. COMMUNICATION FROM THE fore the House the following commu- f nication from the Speaker: CLERK OF THE HOUSE WASHINGTON, DC, THE JOURNAL The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- fore the House the following commu- April 13, 2021. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- ANETTE nication from the Clerk of the House of I hereby appoint the Honorable N ant to section 11(a) of House Resolu- DIAZ BARRAGA´ N to act as Speaker pro tem- Representatives: pore on this day. tion 188, the Journal of the last day’s proceedings is approved. OFFICE OF THE CLERK, NANCY PELOSI, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Speaker of the House of Representatives. f Washington, DC, April 13, 2021. f Hon. NANCY PELOSI, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Speaker, House of Representatives, PRAYER The SPEAKER pro tempore.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Speech, the War on Terror, and What's Youtube Got To
    Freedom of Speech, The War on Terror, and What’s YouTube Got to Do with it: American Censorship During Times of Military Conflict Melissa J. Morgans * TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 147 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 149 A. There is a Growing Issue of Terrorist Speech on the Internet Due to the Viral Nature Internet-Based Speech. ............................. 149 B. The United States Government Has Historically Censored Speech During Times of War. ............................................................... 151 C. Despite This Historical Precedent, the First Amendment Permits Censorship of Speech Only in Limited Circumstances. ........... 155 III. TERRORIST SPEECH ON THE INTERNET SHOULD BE CENSORABLE BY THE GOVERNMENT. ......................................................................... 159 A. Censoring Terrorist Speech Today is Consistent with the Tradition of Restrictions on Anti-Government Wartime Speech. ..................................................................................... 159 B. Targeting Internet-Based Speech is Consistent with the Tradition of Restrictions on Uniquely Invasive Media. ........................... 161 IV. THE “STOP TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS FROM PROMOTING INTERNET TRANSMISSIONS ACT” COULD PERMISSIBLY REGULATE TERRORIST SPEECH ONLINE. ............................................................................. 164 * J.D., The George Washington University
    [Show full text]