Online Language Teaching Research
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ONLINE LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH Pedagogical, Academic and Institutional Issues EDITED BY Israel Sanz-Sánchez, Susana V. Rivera-Mills & Regina Morin Online Language Teaching Research: Pedagogical, Academic and Institutional Issues Edited by Israel Sanz-Sánchez West Chester University Susana V. Rivera-Mills Oregon State University Regina Morin The College of New Jersey Published by Trysting Tree Books 121 The Valley Library Corvallis, OR 97331–4501 https://trystingtree.library.oregonstate.edu/ Text © The Authors 2017 First published 2017 Cover design by Amber MacKay Cover image by picjumbo_com / pixabay Licensed under CC0 Public Domain Digital versions typeset by Siliconchips Services Ltd. e-ISBN: 978-0-9996872-0-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5399/osu.ubi1 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Interna- tional License (unless stated otherwise within the content of the work). To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This license allows for copying any part of the work for personal and commercial use, providing author attribution is clearly stated. The full text of this book has been peer-reviewed to ensure high academic standards. For full review policies, see https://trystingtree.library.oregonstate. edu/site/research-integrity/ Suggested citation: Sanz-Sánchez, I, Rivera-Mills, S V and Morin, R 2017 Online Language Teaching Research: Pedagogical, Academic and Institutional Issues. Corvallis, OR: Trysting Tree Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5399/osu.ubi1. License: CC-BY 4.0 To read the free, open access version of this book online, visit https://doi.org/10.5399/osu.ubi1 or scan this QR code with your mobile device: Table of Contents Introduction (Robert J. Blake) 1 Between SLA Theory and Student Perceptions: Best Practices (Pamela L. Anderson-Mejías) 9 Social Networking Site Participation and Language Learner Motivation (Adrienne Gonzales) 35 Can You Repeat, Please? L2 Complexity, Awareness, and Fluency Development in the Hybrid “Classroom” (Gabriel A. Guillén, Robert J. Blake) 55 Synchronous Video Chat Sessions in a TESOL Online Graduate Course: Instructor Roles and Best Practices (Esther Smidt, Ashley McAndrew, and Brian McDyre) 79 In Search of the Perfect Blend: An ESL Hybrid Course for Prospective Primary Teachers (María Fernández Agüero and Isabel Alonso Belmonte) 101 Elements of Good Design: Applying the Quality Matters Rubric to Develop Language Courses (Patricia MacGregor-Mendoza) 127 Building and Sustaining Language Degrees Online: The Case of German and Spanish (Sebastian Heiduschke and David Prats) 151 Conclusion: The Future of Online Language Teaching Research (Israel Sanz-Sánchez and Regina Morin) 173 Introduction Robert J. Blake University of California, Davis Without any doubt, online teaching has finally come into its own. According to Allen and Seaman, online courses now make up a third of the higher education offerings. Second-language (L2) instruction has not lagged too far behind this general educational trend, with hybrid and fully online classes in ESL, com- monly taught, and less commonly taught languages having now become an accepted part of many departmental offerings, especially in junior colleges and large state universities (Blake, “Best Practices”; “2013 Keynote Address”). The reasons behind the popularity of these online formats readily come to mind: (1) the existence of a new generation of students who like learning via the computer because in their real lives they normally spend hours doing digi- tal things; (2) the severe time limitations imposed by classroom language study with only 50 minutes of instruction per day (and even less actual language practice) three, four or, at best, five days a week; and, conversely, the promise of more time on task using hybrid and online formats; (3) the convenience of anytime and anywhere learning through online formats; (4) the treasure-trove of authentic materials available online in all the world’s languages; and finally, (5) the new digital affordances that promote L2 interactions in ways that par- allel or even improve what can happen in the classroom, as we will discuss further below. How to cite this book chapter: Blake, R J. 2017. Introduction. In: Sanz-Sánchez, I, Rivera-Mills, S V and Morin, R. (eds.) Online Language Teaching Research: Pedagogical, Academic and Institutional Issues. Pp. 1–7. Corvallis, OR: Trysting Tree Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5399/ osu.ubi1.a. License: CC-BY 4.0 2 Online Language Teaching Research Despite the attention being given to digital delivery, no one would suggest that online language education should entirely replace the experience of the in-situ classroom, but more off-campus options for students with complicated modern lives and schedules is a welcome innovation. The profession’s reluctance to accept online language learning is selective, rather than a wholesale rejec- tion. Although our profession has already embraced the usefulness of digital reading (with e-glosses and other types of digital support) and online collabo- rative writing (Oskoz and Elola, “Promoting Foreign Language”; “Integrating digital stories”), few language instructors think about doing L2 speaking prac- tice online (Blake, “Technologies for Teaching”). Moreover, many language professionals question the value of L2 interactions taking place in these tech- nologically assisted learning environments. We all would agree that a language curriculum without ample speaking and listening practice would fail to meet the gold standard; after all, language is inherently a social activity. However, few language instructors are willing to admit that their students normally only respond actively in class about three or four times an hour. This unspoken class- room reality makes reaching advanced proficiency in the L2 during the student’s undergraduate lifetime difficult, to say the least. Nevertheless, instructors correctly question how the use of the computer can approximate the face-to-face speaking experiences of the classroom, without all of the live interactions with the instructor, the idealized model for correct language usage. When contemplating fully online language courses, these con- cerns about speaking practice often become a serious impediment to granting course credit, let alone degree credit. On the one hand, these doubts often arise because of the lack of knowl- edge about the many speaking affordances offered by computer-assisted language learning (Blake, “Technologies for Teaching”). On the other hand, many teachers simply refuse to relinquish their traditional role as the sage on the stage in favor of a more up-to-date function as the guide on the side. The language teaching profession also undervalues speaking practice with no direct involvement by the instructor, despite the many studies that have shown learner-learner exchanges contribute to L2 development both in the short and long run. The literature on autonomous learning (Schwienhorst,Learner Autonomy) extols the virtues of letting students direct the course of their own learning. Nevertheless, it should be obvious that the teacher continues to control the curriculum, the activities, and the degree of student self-agency for any given language course online or in class. Little student autonomy and unsound class/ CALL assignments will produce less favorable student outcomes in either learn- ing environment. However, online language success also depends on whether or not the students themselves know how to take advantage of these new ways of communicating—and, in some cases, whether or not they have material access to computers or what some have called the socio-economic digital divide (Warschauer, Technology and Social Inclusion). Introduction 3 These issues form the backdrop for the current volume, which seeks to pro- vide more information about second language acquisition in the digital age, online collaborative speaking opportunities, teacher computer training, and an examination of the institutional barriers or lack of infrastructure that might stand in the way of implementing a pedagogically sound online curriculum. Ever since the heyday of Krashen (Chomsky’s most ardent defender in the arena of L2 theory and practice), language instructors have single-handedly taken on the burden of providing comprehensible input for their students. Ironically, the field of second-language acquisition has long since moved in a different direction, inspired less by Chomsky, and more in tune with Vygotsky and his ideas about the Zone of Proximal Development, along with other con- structivist notions about the importance of interactions, collaborations, explicit instruction, negotiation of meaning, Focus-on-Form, and feedback (Gass; Long and Robinson; Swain; Ellis and Sheen). Best language practices—with online learning environments being no exception (Chapelle)—put students at the center of everything by strengthening a sense of learner agency and autonomy (Little; O’Dowd; Schwienhorst; Guillén). In practical terms, this shift has relied on the basic concept of task (Robinson; Long)—learning by doing. L2 tasks ask learners to carry out goal-oriented activities by solving problems, doing puzzles, analyzing texts or videos from a particular genre, playing games, or sharing/ comparing experiences. In their essence, language tasks involve communica- tion that is meaning-oriented, as authentic as possible, and goal-oriented