Against Digital Art History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Against Digital Art History Digital Art History has a fraught relationship to history and interpretation. Against Digital Art History Claire Bishop Abstract: This article responds to two issues affecting the field of contemporary art history: digital technology and the so­called computational turn in the humanities. It is divided into two parts: the first connects problems with “digital art history,” an offspring of digital humanities, to neoliberal metrics; the second suggests how digital art history’s “distant reading” might nevertheless be deployed critically in the analysis of contemporary art. Keywords: Computational, digital, metrics, reading Part One1 First, let me clarify that I am not Drucker nevertheless imagines that talking about digitized art history (i.e., future digital databases will permit the use of online image collections) but new questions to be asked of canonical rather digital art history, that is, the works; she imagines, for example, a use of computational methodologies database containing the provenance and analytical techniques enabled by history of different sources of pigments new technology: visualization, network used in Western manuscript illu mi na- analysis, topic modeling, simulation, tion and Renaissance painting, which pattern recognition, aggregation of would situate a work like Van Eyck’s materials from disparate geographical Arnolfini Wedding (1434) in relation to locations, etc. Some of these techniques global systems of trade and economic have been around for several decades value. Her vision of digital art history and have proven useful, especially for thus stands as a combination of digital scholars working on periods where technologies, network analysis, and there is little surviving visual evidence connoisseurship. (e.g., reconstructing ancient sites). Yet the visual theorist Johanna Drucker, Rather than thinking in terms of writing in 2013, states that so far theo re ti cal chan ges, how ever, we should none of art history’s “fundamental ap- compare the in cursion of di gi tal re pro- proaches, tenets of belief, or methods duc tion into art history to previous are altered by digital work”—unlike in tech no log i cal in no va tions. Prior to the 1980s, when “traditional art his- the late nineteenth century, art histor - tory” was upended by the incursion of ians employed originals, casts, prints, semiotics, psychoanalysis, Marxism, sketches, and verbal descriptions to feminism, post-colonial theory, and support­­ and dis seminate their research post-structuralism (Drucker 2013).2 (Nelson 2000). The introduction of Against Digital Art History photographic reproduction enabled (PCA) of over six thousand Impressionist whol ly new meth od ol o gi cal ap- paint ings, calculating visual similarities proaches in art his tory—from the for- in content and coloration.3 Another mal ism of Heinrich Wölfflin, who in- pa per, by K. Bender, analyzes 1,840 tro duced the slide comparison to the works of art from the thirteenth to the art history lecture in the 1880s, to twentieth centuries showing the figure the iconographical approach of Aby of Aphrodite or Venus, revealing that Warburg in the 1920s, who drew upon on average, artists turned to this theme a vast archive of photographic re pro- 2.8 times in their lives (Bender 2015). ductions from antiquity to advertising A third article reports the results of to advance his theory of nachleben. The feeding 120,000 portraits from the change wrought by the digitization of thirteenth to the twentieth centuries slide collections since 2000 is therefore through facial-recognition software in not only one of size and speed (an in- order to establish whether the “canon creased quantity of images for analysis of beauty” had changed over time (de la and faster search returns), but also one Rosa and Suárez 2015). Unsurprisingly, of method, opening the door to “dis- it had—the study concludes that there tant viewing.” Already well known is a conspicuous decrease of “beauty” in in Comparative Literature as “distant the twentieth century. Only to some one reading,” this method proceeds by entirely unfamiliar with modernism subjecting vast numbers of cultural would this come as a surprise. artifacts to quantitative computational analysis. I admit that most academic papers, when boiled down to one line, risk A troubling introduction to this sounding simplistic, but in this case meth od can be found in the first issue of the fatuity is extreme. Basic terms like the International Journal for Digital Art beauty (and even portraiture) remain History, launched in June 2015. In the uninterrogated; instead, the authors first of six articles, new media theorist observe that the “more average and Lev Manovich introduces five key terms symmetri cal, the more beautiful a face from data science that he believes to be is usually ranked,” noting with appro val useful to art historians: object, features, that this criterion turns “a sub jec tive data, feature space, and dimension opinion such as what face is beauti- reduction (Manovich 2015). His text is ful into something measurable and illustrated with examples of his own ob jective” (ibid.). A complex human research projects that draw upon Big evaluation is reduced to statistical Data, including Selfiecity(visualizations calculation. Equally blunt is the claim, of thousands of Instagram selfies found in almost every essay in this in different cities around the globe, jour nal’s inaugural issue, that “this assessing the images in terms of age, empirical finding has never before been gender, position, frequency of smiling, highlighted in art history”—as if novelty etc.) and a principle content analysis were a sufcient measure of interest and 124 DAH-Journal #3 Against Digital Art History substance. Further, the data set afrms sidelines, were repositioned as key the art historical canon (“Impressionist players: Sonia Delaunay and Natalia paintings,” “figures of Aphrodite or Goncharova were ranked as the Venus”) rather than challenging it “most connected” alongside Jean Arp, or even addressing it critically. Who Guillaume Apollinaire, Pablo Picasso, decides what is understood as the Tristan Tzara, and Alfred Stieglitz. canon? What is left out? On the evidence But what does it really mean to be of these articles, practitioners of digital “connected”? As art history doctoral art history have a limited awareness of students Jonathan Patkowski and critical debates within art history (such Nicole Reiner argue in their critique as the long-standing, and some would of the exhibition, this map recodes say long-dead, question of “beauty”), the early twentieth-century artist as a but also a limited grasp on how to contemporary networked entrepreneur frame a meaningful research question. whose importance is now gauged in Theoretical problems are steamrollered terms of number of social connections flat by the weight of data. (i.e., documentable acquaintances) rather than artistic innovations (Pat- This silence, however, seems to be to kowski and Reiner 2013). Carefully rea- digital art history’s advantage. This new soned historical narrative is replaced approach is already finding its way into by social network (the avant-garde museums, and not just conservation equivalent of LinkedIn) and has no departments that have long had a re- room for non-human agents that la tionship to scientific research. Con- elude quantification—such as African sider the network map produced by artifacts, which were crucial to the the Museum of Modern Art, New development of abstraction, or the York, for the exhibition “Inventing Ab- imperial powers that mobilized their straction 1910–1925” (2012–13), created circulation in Europe. by the curators in collaboration with a professor and a doctoral student My point is that subordinating art at Columbia University’s business history—whether the invention of school.4 The map, an update of Barr’s abstraction, Impressionist painting, or well-known diagram for the catalogue the new genre of the selfie—to com- Cubism and Abstract Art (1936), covered putational analysis might well reveal a wall at the entrance to the exhibition. “empirical findings never before On the exhibition website, the map highlighted in art history,” but this allows users to click on various names, method also perpetuates uncritical mapped geospatially from the West to assumptions about the intrinsic value the East, in order to see which artists of statistics. In Undoing the Demos were in contact with whom dur ing (2015), Wendy Brown argues that this period. One positive outcome neoliberalism should be regarded less of this mapping was that several fe- as a political formation than as a form male artists, usually relegated to the of reason, a system of governance in DAH-Journal #3 125 Against Digital Art History which “all spheres of existence are study that mobilizes Big Data needs to framed and measured by economic reflect critically on the mechanisms by terms and metrics, even when those which this data is gathered: corporate spheres are not directly monetized” data mining, state surveillance, and (Brown 2015, 10). Her examples include algorithmic governance techniques.7 any online activity that measures output by the number of “likes” or “followers,” Digital art history, as the belated tail from Facebook and Instagram to online end of the digital humanities, signals a dating. Digital art history is just such change in the character of knowledge a subordination of human activity to and learning. Ideals like public service, metric evaluation. It is inextricably citizenship,
Recommended publications
  • Introduction Johanna Drucker Is the Inaugural Martin and Bernard
    Introduction Johanna Drucker is the inaugural Martin and Bernard Breslauer Professor of Bibliography in the Department of Information Studies at the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies (GSE&IS) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). She is an influential book artist, poet and visual theorist. Her scholarly work ranges from alphabet historiography, to typography, graphic design, and digital humanities. Libraries and special collections around the world have collected her books. In 2012 she celebrated four decades of creating books, visual projects and graphic art with the retrospective, “Druckworks: 40 Years of Books and Projects,” which was exhibited at the Columbia College Center for Book and Paper Arts and now at the San Francisco Center for the Book until August 2013. At UCLA since 2008, Professor Drucker is a faculty advisor for InterActions and teaches courses ranging from history of the book and print technologies, to information visualization, and digital humanities. This spring, Jennifer Berdan interviewed Professor Drucker about her newest collaboratively written book, the digital humanities certificate program at UCLA, and the past and future of digital humanities in the academy. Digital_Humanities was published in November of 2012 and is coauthored by Anne Burdick, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. An Open Access Edition through the MIT Press website: http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/digitalhumanities-0. This provocative and insightful book answers the burning question, “What is digital humanities?” and examines nontraditional modes of humanistic scholarship. The book provides interventions, case studies, and guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship projects and programs. In addition to the new book, Berdan and Drucker discussed how digital humanities currently exists at UCLA with the new certificate program, and how it relates to the mission of InterActions and GSE&IS.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Conceptualisms: Poetics After Critique and the End of the Individual Voice Johanna Drucker
    Beyond Conceptualisms: Poetics after Critique and the End of the Individual Voice Johanna Drucker CONCEPTUAL WRITING WAS INTRIGUING AND PROVOCATIVE. In the last few years, its practices have generated much debate. But as its outlines have become more defined, it seems to be passing into another phase. Institutionalization often signals that energetic innovation is becoming history or at least has ceased to break new ground. Anthologized, reviewed, theorized and retheorized, its publications supported by Kickstarter campaigns, its high-profile figures the subject of blogs and tweets, conceptual writing may be over. Many of its identifiable moves are taught in the edgier academic programs where its procedural techniques distance the work from the stock-in-trade of more conventional “creative” writing. As someone who has long advocated courses in “self-repression,” especially for the young, I have no problem with these mash-ups, lists, re-mediations, and other mechanically generated outputs replacing epiphanic or confessional verse in the classroom. But in this derivative second and third generation, the work loses most of its interest. Read aloud, much conceptualism might as well be automated text-to-voice samplings of contemporary language across a spectrum from banal to more banal. Flattened, ordinary, stripped of affect, the text-generating machines of its formulae do not compose as much as produce a text. Some conceptual writing is downright boring. Some is exceptional, even poignantly, richly humanistic, not mechanistic in the least. But as an intellectual product, conceptual writing is as indica- procedural work that came to the fore in the 1960s, also might tive of our thought-forms in our time as any other—provided be used as milestones or reference frames to guide historical the repeated “our” in that statement refers to some higher- understanding of the conditions and contexts from which the order, emergent form of culture, rather than a self-selected impulse against late-romantic heroic individualism sprung.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Book School 2016 Summer Courses Offered at Yale University, the Library Company of Philadelphia, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Virginia
    RARE BOOK SCHOOL 2016 Summer courses offered at Yale University, the Library Company of Philadelphia, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Virginia. 5–10 JUNE IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA G-20 Printed Books to 1800: Description & Analysis · david whitesell G-70 Advanced Seminar in Critical Bibliography · michael f. suarez, s.j. I-35 The Identification of Photographic Print Processes · ryan boatright & james m. reilly L-65 Digitizing the Cultural Record · bethany nowviskie & andrew stauffer M-10 Introduction to Paleography, 800–1500 · consuelo dutschke 5–10 JUNE IN NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT C-85 Law Books: History & Connoisseurship · mike widener M-90 Advanced Seminar in Medieval Manuscript Studies · barbara a. shailor 12–17 JUNE IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA H-10 The History of the Book, 200–2000 · john buchtel & mark dimunation H-85 The History of the Book in China · soren edgren L-45 Reference Sources for Researching Printed Americana · joel silver M-70 The Handwriting & Culture of Early Modern English Manuscripts · heather wolfe T-60 The History of 19th- & 20th-Century Typography & Printing · john kristensen & katherine mccanless ruffin 12–17 JUNE IN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA H-25 Fifteenth-Century Books in Print & Manuscript · paul needham & will noel H-80 The Stationers’ Company to 1775 · ian gadd 10–15 JULY IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA B-10 Introduction to the History of Bookbinding · jan storm van leeuwen G-30 Printed Books since 1800: Description & Analysis · peter shillingsburg I-40 The Illustrated Scientific Book to 1800 · roger gaskell, assisted by caroline duroselle-melish L-30 Rare Book Cataloging · deborah j. leslie L-100 Digital Approaches to Bibliography & Book History · benjamin f.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews & Press •
    REVIEWS & PRESS Johanna Drucker. The Century of Artists’ Books. Granary Books, 2004. • Trusky, Tom. "Ex Libris." Afterimage (July/ August 1997): 19. In "Metaphor and Form," the last chapter of The Century of Artists' Books, Johanna Drucker recalls a scene in Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights (1847). The narrator, Mr. Lockwood, has discovered a jumble of books once belonging to Heathcliff's beloved Catherine Earnshaw and is surprised to discover Catherine made use of even unread volumes. Of Catherine's books, Bronte writes and Drucker quotes: "scarcely one chapter had escaped a pen and ink commentary —at least the appearance of one— covering every morsel of blank that the printer had left. Some were detached sentences; other parts took the form of a regular diary." Not only does Bronte's story illustrate that the book, as Drucker phrases it, "has the potential to provide a private space for communication across vast spaces of time and geography," but it also illustrates how books engender, encourage and inspire—much as Drucker's book has affected me. Not only have I been exhilarated, reading Drucker's witty and pioneering (not-quite) global history of artists' books, but I have also been unconsciously creating my very own biblio stegosaur; on the book's attractive green dust jacket and from the book's head, tail and fore edge protrude scores of little lemon-colored Post-it notes laden with my scribblings. Many of my Post-its simply contain a list of numbers, reminders to pay heed to Drucker's invaluable endnotes that follow each of her 14 chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Narrative and Artists' Books Foster Hall Gallery, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge September 5,1999 to September 30,1999
    JOURNAL OF ARTISTS' BOOKS JA SPECIAL ISSUE: Experimental Narrative and Artists' Books Foster Hall Gallery, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge September 5,1999 to September 30,1999 "TURNINGTHE PAGE: A CELEBRATIONOF THE ARTSOF THE BOOK" JAB12 IS entlrely dedicated to the exhlbltlon, "Expenmental Nai As we "turn the page" to the 21st century, Interest and even con- ratlve and Artlsts' Books," Foster Hall Gallery, School of Ar cern about the future of the book In a world where electronic Loulslana State Unlverslty, September 5, 1999 through Septembt ommunication becomes more and more commonplace is ever 30, 1999 It contalns statements by the artlsts whose work IS fei icreasing. The Libraries and the School of Art at Louisiana State tured In the exh~bltlonand catalogue Bill Burke, Fran~o 'niversity have developed Turning the Page, to create communi- Deschamps, Helen Douglas, Johanna Drucker, Brad Freema1 awareness of the book as an art form. Ten Baton Rouge orga- Ruth Laxson, Cllfton Meador, Judlth Mohns, Bea Nettles, Gty izations have cooperated to create the first city-wide celebra- Rlchman, Clarlssa Sllgh, Telfer Stokes, Phlllp z~mmermm~*d on of this kind, which is aimed at increasing our appreciation Janet Zwelg nd broadening our definition of the book and its place in the volving world of contemporary art. These events celebrate the As part of the opportunities afforded by h~sposltlon as ViSitlng ~chtradition of book making and highlight works of today's Professional at Loulslana State Unlverslty In Baton Rouge, for Fall lcst prominent
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit? Jay David Bolter Georgia Institute of Technology, [email protected]
    Criticism Volume 49 | Issue 1 Article 5 2007 Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit? Jay David Bolter Georgia Institute of Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Bolter, Jay David (2007) "Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit?," Criticism: Vol. 49: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol49/iss1/5 050 rev-bolt (105-118) 3/3/08 8:44 AM Page 107 JAY DAVID BOLTER Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit? Always Already New: Media, History, and the Data of Culture, by Lisa Gitelman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. Pp. 221. $36.00 cloth. Avatars of Story, by Marie-Laure Ryan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. Pp. xxiv + 275. $60.00 cloth, $20.00 paper. Sweet Dreams: Contemporary Art and Complicity, by Johanna Drucker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Pp. xviii + 291. $40.00 cloth, $27.50 paper. WHAT DO Manuel Castells, Lev Manovich, Will Wright, Howard Rheingold, Paul Dourish, Christa Sommerer, Margaret Morse, and N. Katherine Hayles have in common? They all create or study digital media artifacts. What else do they have in common? As far as I can see, nothing. Their diverse backgrounds and expert- ise mirror the diversity of digital media today. Popular writers on new media often tell a story of convergence to some single technological future, but what we are seeing today is a rich diversity of forms of production and critical approaches. The areas of digital media production include communications and publishing software, games and other entertainment software, digital art, and experimental design.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaled Entity Search: a Method for Media Historiography and Response to Critiques of Big Humanities Data Research
    Scaled Entity Search: A Method for Media Historiography and Response to Critiques of Big Humanities Data Research Eric Hoyt, Kit Hughes, Derek Long, Anthony Tran Kevin Ponto Department of Communication Arts Department of Design Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA Madison, WI, USA [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Search has been unfairly maligned within digital keyword searches, SES allows users to submit hundreds or humanities big data research. While many digital tools lack a thousands of queries to their corpus simultaneously. In so wide audience due to the uncertainty of researchers regarding doing, SES restores some of the context lost by keyword their operation and/or skepticism towards their utility, search offers functions already familiar and potentially transparent to searches by helping the user to establish and analyze re- a range of users. To adapt search to the scale of Big Data, we lationships between entities and across time. In addition offer Scaled Entity Search (SES). Designed as an interpretive to the technical method of SES, we propose an analytical method to accompany an under-construction application that framework for SES users. The analytical framework can be allows users to search hundreds or thousands of entities across conceptualized as a triangle with three points: the entities, a corpus simultaneously, in so doing restoring the context lost in keyword searching, SES balances critical reflection on the the corpus, and the digital. As we explain, users and re- entities, corpus, and digital with an appreciation of how all of searchers need to think critically about all three points on the these factors interact to shape both our results and our future triangle as well as the relationships between the points.
    [Show full text]
  • TO FIGURE out WHAT IS HAPPENING: an Interview with Johanna Drucker
    TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IS HAPPENING: An Interview with Johanna Drucker Shaw, Tate. The Journal of Artists’ Books 21. Spring 2007. • Johanna Drucker needs almost no introduction to JAB readers; she has been a revolutionary explorer in the small world of artists’ books for over three decades. As JAB re-forms it seems essential to report on Drucker’s artists’ books. It must be mentioned that while her productivity of artists’ books is copious by any standard, this is only a fraction of her output in general. It is fair to say that Drucker is accomplished at historicizing and contextualizing nearly any field she chooses. Drucker is the Robertson Professor of Media Studies at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, VA. She is well known for histories of the alphabet (Alphabetic Labyrinth, Thames and Hudson) and experimental typography (The Visible Word, University of Chicago Press). Her most recent theoretical publication is Sweet Dreams: Contemporary Art and Complicity (University Chicago Press). Currently, Drucker is writing a history of graphic design. Most fitting for the context of this publication are Drucker’s works The Century of Artists’ Books and Figuring the Word (Granary Books). These collections were radical and influential for this interviewer. To begin with, The Century of Artists’ Books remains a finding aid for researching books by artists unavailable elsewhere. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, Drucker organized these books, not hierarchically, not chronologically, but by concept—themes, subjects, practice, and ideas. This is no small statement in a largely formalist field for which there is little consequential criticism, nor a widely accepted critical language to improve artists’ book literacy in any meaningful way.
    [Show full text]
  • Resisting Extinction: the Pictorial in Contemporary American Literature
    Writing Technologies http://www.ntu.ac.uk/writing_technologies/index.html Special Issue Representational and Literary Futures: American Writing in the New Millennium Guest edited by Tatiani G. Rapatzikou and Arthur Redding Resisting Extinction: The Pictorial in Contemporary American Literature Danuta Fjellestad Writing Technologies, vol. 3 (2010), 11-24 ISSN 1754-9035 Resisting Extinction 11 Resisting Extinction: The Pictorial in Contemporary American Literature Danuta Fjellestad Pronouncements of the death of the novel have been voiced with some regularity ever since the novel’s birth. Judging by the titles, such obituaries seem to have been particularly frequent in the twentieth century. At this point few may remember José Ortega y Gasset’s Decline of the Novel (1925) or Louis Rubin’s Curious Death of the Novel: Essays in American Literature (1967); John Barth’s landmark essay ‘The Literature of Exhaustion’ (1967) or Alvin Kernan’s Death of Literature (1990) are more likely to be recognized, albeit for different reasons. 1 Since the early 1990s, worries about the demise of the novel have been augmented by fears that the print book is promptly becoming an endangered species, that it is threatened by a proliferation of what is collectively referred to as ‘new media’, that the Internet is its prime enemy. Robert Coover’s article, ‘The End of the Books’, set off major tremors in 1992 when readers interpreted the essay as an unconditional hailing of the hypertext that was to replace the physical book. 2 Apocalyptic moods have spread through a number of attention-grabbing titles, such as The Gutenberg Elegies or ‘The Last Book’.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Collage in Postmodern Narrative Illustration
    Framing the Text: An Investigation of Collage in Postmodern Narrative Illustration Joanne Halse Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS OSCH April 2006 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it at any university for a degree. Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Collage, as a verbal and visual medium, epitomises the heterogeneity, indeterminacy and fragmentation of the postmodern moment. In this thesis I argue that visual collage - in the context of book illustration - presents an ideal form with which to illustrate the state of contemporary (postmodern) narrative. Postmodernism, as a term or concept, evades any form of absolute or definitive account. Hence, in my discussion of the postmodern condition I move towards an understanding of this complex theoretical and cultural phenomenon. Postmodern cultural artifacts reflect the state of a modernised, Western-orientated, globalised consciousness, which resists arborescent structures in past and contemporary texts. In both postmodern narratives and in literary fictional narratives the condition of artifice is amplified. Thus, this thesis explores various characteristics evident in postmodern fiction in order to understand and demonstrate the changes manifest in contemporary narratives in general. Many of the stylistic and figurative devices employed in the postmodern novel foreground the excessive appropriation and self-reflexive textualism of contemporary texts - these literary devices often reflect particular collage-like tendencies or characteristics. Contemporary literary theory, in addition, provides many useful terms and concepts with which to describe visual texts and, for the purposes of this discussion, narrative illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Artists Will Speak Informally About Their Work
    The 6th Annual New Jersey Book Arts Symposium, Original Copies: The Book Arts and Reproduction will be held on November 3, 2000 at the John Cotton Dana Library, Rutgers--Newark, Newark, N.J. The morning will begin with a vigorous workshop on making flexagons ("a folded paper figure that flexes in a mysterious manner to reveal any number of faces from three to infinity," Madeline Jones). After a report by Karen McDermott about life at The Gallery in South Orange in the aftermath of the watershed exhibition of artists' books, Beyond The Fold, four distinguished and exciting New Jersey book artists will speak informally about their work. William J. Dane, the morning's master of ceremonies, will show off rare and unusual books from the print and book arts collections of the Newark Public Library, and introduce the morning's speakers. The afternoon discussions, moderated by Judith K. Brodsky, will shape up around three papers that interrogate ideas and assumptions about originality and reproduction in various areas of the book arts. The Book Artists Jam--at which Symposium attendees will have table space to exhibit, discuss and sell their own book art--will follow a short break. Symposiasts are cordially invited to remain for the exhibition opening of Artists and The Book: John Ross and Clare Romano, curated by Andrea Honoré, featuring both the traditional and non-traditional book work of the acclaimed artists, printmakers and authors of the book, The Complete Printmaker. Catalogs of the exhibition, printed by the Venetian printer Grafiche Antiga, will be available free of charge, and a limited number of signed posters will be available for purchase.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities and Limits of Network Analysis in Art History Miriam Kienle University of Kentucky, [email protected]
    Artl@s Bulletin Volume 6 Issue 3 Visualizing Networks: Approaches to Network Article 1 Analysis in Art History 2017 Between Nodes and Edges: Possibilities and Limits of Network Analysis in Art History Miriam Kienle University of Kentucky, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/artlas Part of the Digital Humanities Commons, Fine Arts Commons, Interdisciplinary Arts and Media Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Kienle, Miriam. "Between Nodes and Edges: Possibilities and Limits of Network Analysis in Art History." Artl@s Bulletin 6, no. 3 (2017): Article 1. This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. This is an Open Access journal. This means that it uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. Readers may freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles. This journal is covered under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Visualizing Networks: Approaches to Network Analysis in Art History Miriam Kienle, Guest Editor ARTL@S BULLETIN Volume 6, Issue 3 Fall 2017 Editorial Statement The ARTL@S BULLETIN is a peer-reviewed, transdisciplinary journal devoted to spatial and transnational questions in the history of the arts and literature. The Artl@s Bulletin ’s ambition is twofold: 1. a focus on the Editors-in-Chief “transnational” as constituted by exchange between the local and the global or between the national and the international; 2. Catherine Dossin an openness to innovation in research methods, particularly the Purdue University quantitative possibilities offered by digital mapping and data visualization.
    [Show full text]