DOCSLIB.ORG

Download File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download File Somatic Landscapes Affects, Percepts, and Materialities in Select Tragedies of Euripides Maria Combatti Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Maria Combatti All Rights Reserved Abstract Somatic Landscapes: Affects, Percepts, and Materialities in Select Tragedies of Euripides Maria Combatti This study explores how in central plays of Euripides – namely, Alcestis, Hippolytus, Helen, and Bacchae – bodies, landscapes, and objects (both seen on stage and described in speeches, dialogues, and choral odes) serve as media for assessing affective states, materializing the characters’ feelings and sensations and hence enabling the audience to vividly perceive them. My focus is grounded in the ancient conceptions of bodies and the senses in material from the Pre-Socratic and the Hippocratic writings, including theories about how the surrounding environment influences bodily types. It is also underpinned by theoretical perspectives that have come to prominence in recent research in ancient literature and culture. First, it draws on insights from phenomenology, aesthetics, and affective theory that in ancient drama highlight embodiment, synaesthesia, and the circulation of affects among characters and spectators. Second, it engages with works inspired by the new materialisms, which have produced a new attention to the mutual and symbiotic relationship between humans and nonhuman entities. Finally, it is based on the “enactive” approach to cognition, which makes a compelling case for visualization (e.g., spectators’ imagination of the things sung, spoken, or narrated) as grounded in the active, embodied structure of experience. Building on such theories, I posit that Euripides’ plays illustrate how the characters’ feelings and emotions combine with sensory indicators (sight, taste, smell, and touch), so that they operate as visible marks of states usually conceived of as inner. These states are, I suggest, exteriorized not only on bodies but also in their surroundings, such that landscapes as mapped onto the dramatic stage and objects with which the characters interact function as supplements to embodied affective manifestations. In addition to onstage action, I focus on how Euripides’ language triggers a strong resonance in the spectators’ imagination. In this regard, my argument takes up the insights of ancient critics such as Longinus, who has praised Euripides’ ability to generate “emotion” (τὸ παθητικόν) and “excitement” (τὸ συγκεκινημένον) in the audience through “visualization” (φαντασία) and “vividness” (ἐνάργεια). Thus, I examine how references to onstage performance and visualizing language interact, giving the spectators a full picture of the dramatic action. In Alcestis, I explore how embodiment, sensorial phenomena, and physical interactions put the characters’ feelings of pain and grief on prominent display, eliciting the audience’s sensory reaction. In Hippolytus, I examine how the characters’ emotions blend into the surroundings, such that forms, colors, and textures of landscape and objects allow the spectators to perceive inner states more forcefully. In Helen, I investigate how material and nonhuman things, such as rivers, plants, costumes, weapons, statues, ships connect to the characters as parts of an affective entanglement that heightens the experiential appeal of the characters’ feelings and sensations. In the Bacchae, I regard Dionysus’ action as an affective force that spreads throughout the world of the play, cracks, and mutates things, including human and animal bodies, natural elements, and objects. This action creates an enmeshment between things, which is embodied by the thyrsus topped with Pentheus’ head (mask) that gives the spectators a keen sense of the multiple, productive, and transformative nature of Dionysus’ power. In conclusion, this study argues that bodies, landscapes, and objects represent the privileged sites for exploring the affective exchange between the characters and the audience, refining our understanding of the intensity, impact, and reception of the Euripidean theater. Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Dedication iv Introduction 1 Chapter One: Alcestis: Embodiment and Tactile Sensations 28 1.1 The Embodied Experience of Death 33 1.2 The Statue, Bilge Water, and the Bed 39 1.3 The Living Body, Turbid Water, and Touch 51 Conclusion 58 Chapter Two: Hippolytus: The Texture and Materiality of Landscape 60 2.1 Aphrodite’s Cosmological Power and the Place of Action 65 2.2. Phaedra: The Robes, the Mountain Space, and Water 68 2.3 Theseus: The Sea, the Tablet, and the Curse 83 2.4 Hippolytus: The Statue, the Star, and the Sea 86 2.5 Artemis’ Epiphany and Hippolytus’ Death: Smell, Tears, and Darkness 96 Conclusion 98 Chapter Three: Helen: The Entanglement between Humans and Things 100 3.1. Helen and Teucer: The Nile, the Tomb, and the Arms 109 3.2 Helen and Menelaus: The Sirens, the Reeds, the Egg, the Statue, the Rags, the Palace, and the Tomb 117 3.3 Helen, Theoclymenus, and Menelaus: The Mask, the Shrouds, the Armor, the Ship, and the Discus 136 3.4 The Exodos: The Ship and Helen Island 150 i Conclusion 152 Chapter Four: Bacchae: The Rhizomatic Molecularity of Dionysiac Experience 153 4.1 Dionysus’ Arrival in Thebes and the Propagation of his Power 162 4.2 Dionysus’ Imprisonment and the Palace’s Collapse 170 4.3 The First Messenger Speech: The Maenads on the Cithaeron, the Sparagmos of the Cattle and the Dressing of Pentheus 176 4.4 The Second Messenger Speech: The Assault on the Tree and the Sparagmos of Pentheus 181 4.5 The Recomposition of Pentheus’ Body, the Thyrsus, and the Snake 187 Conclusion 190 Conclusion 192 Bibliography 195 ii Acknowledgments My deep gratitude goes to Nancy Worman, who has been an inspiring guide during my graduate studies and has spurred me on to become a better researcher. She has helped me to ameliorate my writing and challenged me to deal with theory and scholarship critically. My gratitude is also due to Helene Foley for her precious, insightful, and helpful feedback and to Elizabeth Scharffenberger for her continuous guidance, support, and valuable comments. I also thank Katherine Lu Hsu and Melissa Mueller for reading my dissertation and giving helpful suggestions. The past years as a graduate student have been challenging and stimulating, and I am grateful to all the professors in the department of Classics at Columbia University who have encouraged me from the beginning of the program. A special thank goes also to my colleagues who shared with me joy and preoccupations during these years and to all my friends in New York, Italy, and France. Finally, my utmost gratitude goes to Germano, who has constantly supported me and encouraged me to believe in myself and never give up in moments of discomfort. Thanks to him and to my parents I can now rejoice at the completeness of my doctorate. iii to Germano iv Introduction All my early memories are of forms and shapes and textures. Moving through and over the West Riding landscape with my father in his car, the hills were sculptures; the roads defined the form. Above all, there was the sensation of moving physically over the contours of fulnesses and concavities, through hollows and over peaks – feeling, touching, seeing, through mind and hand and eye. This sensation has never left me. I, the sculptor, am the landscape. I am the form and I am the hollow, the thrust and the contour. Barbara Hepworth, A Pictorial Autobiography Barbara Hepworth’ s words are a suitable starting point for the present study which explores how in central plays of Euripides – namely, Alcestis, Hippolytus, Helen, and Bacchae1 – bodies, landscapes, and objects serve as media for assessing affective states, materializing the characters’ feelings and sensations2 and hence enabling the audience to vividly perceive them.3 In this respect, the hills, peaks, and concavities of the West Riding landscape may be seen as stage bodily postures, proxemics, and motions that stimulate affective responses in the audience, by highlighting synesthetic phenomena, such as sight and touch.4 The passage also illustrates how humans view and perceive the surrounding environment. Indeed, according to recent cognitive and perceptive theories we don’t see the external world like a static picture. Rather, we 1 For a discussion about my focus on Euripides and the selection of the plays, see below. 2 The representation of characters or dramatis personae in Greek tragedy has prompted a long debate among scholars. I agree with those scholars who consider tragic characters as constructs that are in a balance with the worldview, conventions, and features of the genre. For an overview on the discussion about character and characterization, see Goldhill (1986) 100-127; Pelling (1990); Worman (2002) 108-48; Thumiger (2007) 18-27; Wiles (2007) 261-285; Rutherford (2012) 283-323. 3 For my consideration of the composition of the ancient audience and its involvement in the dramatic action, see below. 4 Drawing on insights from ancient aesthetics, phenomenology, and affect theory, I consider the audience’s involvement in the dramatic action in terms of an affective embodied engagement. As I will discuss especially in Chapter One, bodily proximities and interactions evoke a strong sense of touch that allows the spectators to undergo a perceptual experience of the characters’ dramatic experiences. On haptic aesthetics,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth)
    The Hellenic Saga Gaia (Earth) Uranus (Heaven) Oceanus = Tethys Iapetus (Titan) = Clymene Themis Atlas Menoetius Prometheus Epimetheus = Pandora Prometheus • “Prometheus made humans out of earth and water, and he also gave them fire…” (Apollodorus Library 1.7.1) • … “and scatter-brained Epimetheus from the first was a mischief to men who eat bread; for it was he who first took of Zeus the woman, the maiden whom he had formed” (Hesiod Theogony ca. 509) Prometheus and Zeus • Zeus concealed the secret of life • Trick of the meat and fat • Zeus concealed fire • Prometheus stole it and gave it to man • Freidrich H. Fuger, 1751 - 1818 • Zeus ordered the creation of Pandora • Zeus chained Prometheus to a mountain • The accounts here are many and confused Maxfield Parish Prometheus 1919 Prometheus Chained Dirck van Baburen 1594 - 1624 Prometheus Nicolas-Sébastien Adam 1705 - 1778 Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus • Novel by Mary Shelly • First published in 1818. • The first true Science Fiction novel • Victor Frankenstein is Prometheus • As with the story of Prometheus, the novel asks about cause and effect, and about responsibility. • Is man accountable for his creations? • Is God? • Are there moral, ethical constraints on man’s creative urges? Mary Shelly • “I saw the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together. I saw the hideous phantasm of a man stretched out, and then, on the working of some powerful engine, show signs of life, and stir with an uneasy, half vital motion. Frightful must it be; for supremely frightful would be the effect of any human endeavour to mock the stupendous mechanism of the Creator of the world” (Introduction to the 1831 edition) Did I request thee, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me? John Milton, Paradise Lost 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Trojan Women: Introduction
    Trojan Women: Introduction 1. Gods in the Trojan Women Two gods take the stage in the prologue to Trojan Women. Are these gods real or abstract? In the prologue, with its monologue by Poseidon followed by a dialogue between the master of the sea and Athena, we see them as real, as actors (perhaps statelier than us, and accoutered with their traditional props, a trident for the sea god, a helmet for Zeus’ daughter). They are otherwise quite ordinary people with their loves and hates and with their infernal flexibility whether moral or emotional. They keep their emotional side removed from humans, distance which will soon become physical. Poseidon cannot stay in Troy, because the citizens don’t worship him any longer. He may feel sadness or regret, but not mourning for the people who once worshiped but now are dead or soon to be dispersed. He is not present for the destruction of the towers that signal his final absence and the diaspora of his Phrygians. He takes pride in the building of the walls, perfected by the use of mason’s rules. After the divine departures, the play proceeds to the inanition of his and Apollo’s labor, with one more use for the towers before they are wiped from the face of the earth. Nothing will be left. It is true, as Hecuba claims, her last vestige of pride, the name of Troy remains, but the place wandered about throughout antiquity and into the modern age. At the end of his monologue Poseidon can still say farewell to the towers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 IPHIGENIA in TAURIS by Euripides Adapted, Edited, and Rendered Into
    IPHIGENIA IN TAURIS by Euripides Adapted, edited, and rendered into modern English for the express purpose of dramatic performance by Louis Markos, Professor in English and Honors Scholar-in-Residence/Robert H. Ray Chair in Humanities Houston Baptist University (Houston, TX) Dramatis Personae IPHIGENIA, daughter of Agamemnon ORESTES, brother of Iphigenia PYLADES, friend of Orestes THOAS, King of the Taurians HERDSMAN MESSENGER ATHENA CHORUS of captive Greek women who serve Iphigenia SCENE Before the temple of Artemis in Tauris. (Iphigenia, dressed as a priestess, enters and stands before the altar.) IPHIGENIA From Asia Pelops came to the shores of Greece; His son was Atreus and from him came Two greater sons, skilled in the arts of war. The eldest, Agamemnon, rules Mycenae While Menelaus holds the throne of Sparta. For Helen’s sake they raised a mighty fleet And set their sails for Troy. But Artemis, Beloved sister of the god Apollo, Sent vexing winds to wrestle with their sails And strand them on the rocky shore of Aulis. Eager to conquer Troy and so avenge His brother’s bed, my father, Agamemnon, Ordered Calchas, prophet of the host, To seek the will of Zeus and to proclaim The cause of their misfortune–and the cure. “O King,” he spoke, “You must fulfill the vow You made to Artemis: to offer up The dearest treasure that the year would bring. 1 The daughter born to you and Clytemnestra— She is the treasure you must sacrifice.” I was and am that daughter—oh the pain, That I should give my life to still the winds! The treacherous Odysseus devised The plot that brought me, innocent, to Aulis.
    [Show full text]
  • Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell
    STUDY GUIDE Photo of Mark L. Montgomery, Stephanie Andrea Barron, and Sandra Marquez by joe mazza/brave lux, inc Sponsored by Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides Translated by Nicholas Rudall Directed by Charles Newell SETTING The action takes place in east-central Greece at the port of Aulis, on the Euripus Strait. The time is approximately 1200 BCE. CHARACTERS Agamemnon father of Iphigenia, husband of Clytemnestra and King of Mycenae Menelaus brother of Agamemnon Clytemnestra mother of Iphigenia, wife of Agamemnon Iphigenia daughter of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra Achilles son of Peleus Chorus women of Chalcis who came to Aulis to see the Greek army Old Man servant of Agamemnon, was given as part of Clytemnestra’s dowry Messenger ABOUT THE PLAY Iphigenia in Aulis is the last existing work of the playwright Euripides. Written between 408 and 406 BCE, the year of Euripides’ death, the play was first produced the following year in a trilogy with The Bacchaeand Alcmaeon in Corinth by his son, Euripides the Younger, and won the first place at the Athenian City Dionysia festival. Agamemnon Costume rendering by Jacqueline Firkins. 2 SYNOPSIS At the start of the play, Agamemnon reveals to the Old Man that his army and warships are stranded in Aulis due to a lack of sailing winds. The winds have died because Agamemnon is being punished by the goddess Artemis, whom he offended. The only way to remedy this situation is for Agamemnon to sacrifice his daughter, Iphigenia, to the goddess Artemis. Agamemnon then admits that he has sent for Iphigenia to be brought to Aulis but he has changed his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characteristics of Greek Theater
    The Characteristics of Greek Theater GHS AH: Drama Greek Theater: Brief History n Theater owes much to Greek drama, which originated some 27 centuries ago in 7th century BCE. n Greeks were fascinated with the mystery of the art form. n Thespis first had the idea to add a speaking actor to performances of choral song and dance. The term Thespian (or actor) derives from his name. Greek Theater: Brief History n Greek plays were performed in outdoor theaters, usually in the center of town or on a hillside. n From the 6th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE, we see the development of elaborate theater structures. n Yet, the basic layout of the theater remained the same. Tragedy and Comedy n Both flourished in the 5th and 4th centuries BCE, when they were performed, sometimes before 12,000 or more people at religious festivals in honor of Dionysus, the god of wine and the patron of the theater. n Tragedy=dealt with stories from the past n Comedy=dealt with contemporary figures and problems. Introduction to Greek Drama n Video segment: About Drama Complete the worksheet as you watch the video segment. n The masks of comedy and tragedy are emblems of theater today. and they originated in ancient Greece. What are the parts of a Greek theater? What is a Greek Chorus? n The Greek Chorus was a group of poets, singers, and/or dancers that would comment on events in the play. n 12 to 50 members would normally comprise the chorus. n They would explain events not seen by the audience (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69 IX – BOEOTIA – A COLONY OF THE MINI AND THE FLEGI .....71 X – COLONIZATION
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology
    The Ruins of Paradise: Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology by Matthew M. Newman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard Janko, Chair Professor Sara L. Ahbel-Rappe Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Benjamin W. Fortson Professor Ruth S. Scodel Bind us in time, O Seasons clear, and awe. O minstrel galleons of Carib fire, Bequeath us to no earthly shore until Is answered in the vortex of our grave The seal’s wide spindrift gaze toward paradise. (from Hart Crane’s Voyages, II) For Mom and Dad ii Acknowledgments I fear that what follows this preface will appear quite like one of the disorderly monsters it investigates. But should you find anything in this work compelling on account of its being lucid, know that I am not responsible. Not long ago, you see, I was brought up on charges of obscurantisme, although the only “terroristic” aspects of it were self- directed—“Vous avez mal compris; vous êtes idiot.”1 But I’ve been rehabilitated, or perhaps, like Aphrodite in Iliad 5 (if you buy my reading), habilitated for the first time, to the joys of clearer prose. My committee is responsible for this, especially my chair Richard Janko and he who first intervened, Benjamin Fortson. I thank them. If something in here should appear refined, again this is likely owing to the good taste of my committee. And if something should appear peculiarly sensitive, empathic even, then it was the humanity of my committee that enabled, or at least amplified, this, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcmaeon in Psophis
    Alcmaeon in Psophis Psophis was said to have been originally called Erymanthus, and its territory to have been ravaged by the Erymanthian Boar.Pausanias, "Description of Greece" viii. 24. § 2-10] [Hecat. "on Stephanus of Byzantium s.v." polytonic|Ψωφίς] [Apollodorus, ii. Alcmaeon (mythology) â” In Greek mythology, Alcmaeon, or Alkmáon, was the son of Amphiaraus and Eriphyle. As one of the Epigoni, he was a leader of the Argives who attacked Thebes, taking the city in retaliation for the deaths of their fathers, the Seven Against Thebes ⦠Alcmaeon in Psophis. Year: between 180 and 200 AD. Scripts: Alcmaeon in Psophis by Euripides. Genres: Tragedy. Psophis. How to cite this ancient performance. Alcmaeon in Psophis, accessed at http://www.apgrd.ox.ac.uk/ancient- performance/performance/98 <16 September 2018>. Alcmaeon in Psophis (Ancient Greek: Ἀλκμαίων ὠδιὰ Ψωφῖδος, AlkmaiÅn ho dia Psophidos) is a play by Athenian playwright Euripides. The play has been lost except for a few surviving fragments. It was first produced in 438 BCE in a tetralogy that also included the extant Alcestis and the lost Cretan Women and Telephus. The story is believed to have incorporated the death of Argive hero Alcmaeon.[1]. Alcmaeon in Psophis. Alcmaeon (mythology)'s wiki: In Greek mythology, Alcmaeon (Greek: Ἀλκμαίων), was the son of Amphiaraus and Eriphyle. As one of the Epigoni, he was a leader of the Argives who attacked Thebes, taking the city in retaliation for the deaths of their fathers, the Seven Against Thebes, wh.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • Raja Edepus, And: Making of “Raja Edepus.” Lynda Paul
    Raja Edepus, and: Making of “Raja Edepus.” Lynda Paul Asian Music, Volume 42, Number 1, Winter/Spring 2011, pp. 141-145 (Article) Published by University of Texas Press For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/amu/summary/v042/42.1.paul.html Access Provided by Yale University Library at 02/05/11 2:36AM GMT Recording Reviews Raja Edepus. Directed and produced by William Maranda. DVD. 92 min- utes. Vancouver BC: Villon Films, 2009. Available from http://www.villon! lms .com. Making of “Raja Edepus.” Directed and produced by William Maranda. DVD. 27 minutes. Vancouver BC: Villon Films, 2008. Available from http://www .villon! lms.com. If, at ! rst glance, ancient Greek tragedy and contemporary Balinese dance- drama seem unlikely theatrical companions, the production Raja Edepus puts any such doubts to rest. Produced by William Maranda with artistic direction by Nyoman Wenten, Raja Edepus is a compelling Balinese rendering of the ancient Sophocles drama, Oedipus Rex. Created for live performance at the Bali Arts Festival in 2006, Raja Edepus is now available to a wider public through two DVDs: one, a recording of the show, and the other, a documentary about the performance’s preparation. " e live production fuses musical and dramatic techniques used in contem- porary Balinese theater with techniques thought to have been used in ancient Greek theater. As Maranda describes on the Making of “Raja Edepus” DVD, the two types of theater—though separated by 2500 years and much of the earth— have signi! cant features in common. Maranda explains that he was inspired to initiate this project a# er attending performances of the Balinese gamelan in residence at the University of British Columbia; he was struck by the fact that Ba- linese theater uses masks—a device familiar to Maranda from his previous work on ancient Greek theater.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix in the Iliad
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions Spring 5-4-2017 Phoenix in the Iliad Kati M. Justice Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Justice, Kati M., "Phoenix in the Iliad" (2017). Student Research Submissions. 152. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/152 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHOENIX IN THE ILIAD An honors paper submitted to the Department of Classics, Philosophy, and Religion of the University of Mary Washington in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors Kati M. Justice May 2017 By signing your name below, you affirm that this work is the complete and final version of your paper submitted in partial fulfillment of a degree from the University of Mary Washington. You affirm the University of Mary Washington honor pledge: "I hereby declare upon my word of honor that I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this work." Kati Justice 05/04/17 (digital signature) PHOENIX IN THE ILIAD ​ Kati Justice Dr. Angela Pitts CLAS 485 April 24, 2017 2 Abstract This paper analyzes evidence to support the claim that Phoenix is an narratologically central and original Homeric character in the Iliad. Phoenix, the ​ ​ instructor of Achilles, tries to persuade Achilles to protect the ships of Achaeans during his speech. At the end of his speech, Phoenix tells Achilles about the story of Meleager which serves as a warning about waiting too long to fight the Trojans.
    [Show full text]
  • Actors on High: the Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama
    UC Berkeley Classical Papers Title Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61w4628m Author Mastronarde, Donald J. Publication Date 1990-10-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Published as “Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama” in Classical Antiquity Volume 9, No. 2, October 1990, pages 247-294, ©1990 by The Regents of the University of California. Copying and Permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by the Regents of the University of California for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified fee via Rightslink® on Caliber (http://caliber.ucpress.net/) or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com. [247]DONALD J. MASTRONARDE ACTORS ON HIGH: THE SKENE ROOF, THE CRANE, AND THE GODS IN ATTIC DRAMA* Many recent studies of Greek tragedy and comedy have shown a special interest in staging, not only with a view to antiquarian accuracy, but also in order to assess the playwrights’ techniques and skills in manipulating the visual elements of the performance for dramatic effect.1 The present study addresses a particularly controversial aspect of staging, the appearance of actors “on high.” It is generally agreed that the crane was available in the late fifth century, and it is also widely assumed that the wooden skene building of the late fifth and early fourth centuries had a flat roof, at least a part of which could serve as an additional acting space.
    [Show full text]