Ugri Imaging and Nine-Band Optical-IR Photometry Over 1000 Square Degrees K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ugri Imaging and Nine-Band Optical-IR Photometry Over 1000 Square Degrees K Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. ms c ESO 2019 February 25, 2019 The fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey: ugri imaging and nine-band optical-IR photometry over 1000 square degrees K. Kuijken1, C. Heymans2, A. Dvornik1, H. Hildebrandt3; 4, J.T.A. de Jong5, A.H. Wright4, T. Erben4, M. Bilicki1; 6, B. Giblin2, H.-Y. Shan4; 7, F. Getman8, A. Grado8, H. Hoekstra1, L. Miller9, N. Napolitano10; 8, M. Paolilo11, M. Radovich12, P. Schneider4, W. Sutherland13, M. Tewes4, C. Tortora14, E.A. Valentijn5, and G.A. Verdoes Kleijn5 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK 3 Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany 4 Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, D-53121 Bonn, Germany 5 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, the Netherlands 6 Center for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668, Warsaw, Poland 7 Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Nandan Road 80, Shanghai 200030, China 8 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, Italy 9 Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK 10 School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 519082, Zhuhai Campus, P.R. China 11 Dept.of Physics “Ettore Pancini”, Università Federico II, 80126 Napoli, Italy 12 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, via dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy 13 School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK 14 INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy Received ???; accepted ??? ABSTRACT Context. The Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) is an ongoing optical wide-field imaging survey with the OmegaCAM camera at the VLT Survey Telescope, specifically designed for measuring weak gravitational lensing by galaxies and large-scale structure. When completed it will consist of 1350 square degrees imaged in four filters (ugri). Aims. Here we present the fourth public data release which more than doubles the area of sky covered by data release 3. We also include aperture-matched ZYJHKs photometry from our partner VIKING survey on the VISTA telescope in the photometry catalogue. We illustrate the data quality and describe the catalogue content. Methods. Two dedicated pipelines are used for the production of the optical data. The Astro-WISE information system is used for the production of co-added images in the four survey bands, while a separate reduction of the r-band images using the theli pipeline is used to provide a source catalogue suitable for the core weak lensing science case. All data have been re-reduced for this data release using the latest versions of the pipelines. The VIKING photometry is obtained as forced photometry on the theli sources, using a re-reduction of the VIKING data that starts from the VISTA pawprints. Modifications to the pipelines with respect to earlier releases are described in detail. The photometry is calibrated to the Gaia DR2 G band using stellar locus regression. Results. In this data release a total of 1006 square-degree survey tiles with stacked ugri images are made available, accompanied by weight maps, masks, and single-band source lists. We also provide a multi-band catalogue based on r-band detections, including homogenized photometry and photometric redshifts, for the whole dataset. Mean limiting magnitudes (5σ in a 200 aperture) and the tile-to-tile rms scatter are 24:23 ± 0:12, 25:12 ± 0:14, 25:02 ± 0:13, 23:68 ± 0:27 in ugri, respectively, and the mean r-band seeing is 000:70. Key words. observations: galaxies: general – astronomical data bases: surveys – cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe 1. Introduction: the Kilo-Degree and VIKING focal plane contains the square 268-million pixel CCD mosaic Surveys camera OmegaCAM (Kuijken 2011) that covers a 1◦:013 × 1◦:020 area at 000:213 pitch, and the site and telescope optics (with ac- High-fidelity images of the sky are one of the most fundamental tively controlled primary and secondary mirrors) ensure an im- kinds of data for astronomy research. While for many decades age quality that is sub-arcsecond most of the time, and that does photographic plates dominated optical sky surveys, the advent of not degrade towards the corners of the field. Since starting op- large-format CCD detectors for astronomy opened up the era of erations in October 2011, more than half of the available time digital, high resolution, high sensitivity, linear-response images. on the telescope has been used for a set of three wide-area ‘Pub- lic Imaging Surveys’ for the ESO community. The Kilo-Degree The ESO VLT Survey Telescope (VST; Capaccioli & Schipani 2011; Capaccioli et al. 2012) at ESO’s Paranal observa- tory was specifically designed for wide-field, optical imaging. Its Article number, page 1 of 25 A&A proofs: manuscript no. ms Table 1. KiDS observing strategy: observing condition constraints and exposure times. Filter Max. lunar Min. moon Max. seeing Max. airmass Sky transp. Dithers Total Exp. illumination distance [deg] [arcsec] time [s] u 0.4 90 1.1 1.2 CLEAR 4 1000 g 0.4 80 0.9 1.6 CLEAR 5 900 r 0.4 60 0.8 1.3 CLEAR 5 1800 i 1.0 60 1.1 2.0 CLEAR 5 1200 Table 2. Appriximate boundaries of the KiDS fields (see also Fig. 1). Northern patch, KiDS-N, contains two additional smaller areas: KiDS-N-W2, which coincides with the G9 patch of the GAMA Field RA range Dec range survey (Driver et al. 2011), and KiDS-N-D2, a single pointing KiDS-S [330◦:0; 52◦:5] [−35◦:6; −26◦:6] on the COSMOS field. In a coordinated effort over the same part of the sky, the VISTA Kilo-degree INfrared Galaxy sur- ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ KiDS-N [155:5; 225:5] [−4:0; +4:0] vey (VIKING; Edge et al. 2013) on the nearby VISTA telescope [225◦:5; 238◦:5] [−2◦:0; +3◦:0] added the five bands Z, Y, J, H and Ks. VIKING observations are 4 5 KiDS-N-W2 [128◦:5; 141◦:5] [−2◦:0; +3◦:0] complete and available in the ESO archive . Table 2 and Fig. 1 show the full KiDS footprint on the sky, as well as the part that KiDS-N-D2 [149◦:5; 150◦:5] [+1◦:7; +2◦:7] is covered by the data contained in this data release (KiDS-ESO- DR4, or DR4 for short). The fields that were previously released under DR1+2+3 are also indicated: this is the area that was used 1 Survey (KiDS; de Jong et al. 2013) is the deepest of these, and for the [KiDS450] cosmic shear analysis, with the corresponding the one that exploits the best observing conditions. shape/photometric redshift catalogue released as DR3.1. KiDS was designed as a cosmology survey, to study the In order to improve the fidelity of the photometric redshift- galaxy population out to redshift ∼1 and in particular to mea- based tomography, and to enable inclusion of high-value sources sure the effect on galaxy shapes due to weak gravitational lens- in the redshift range 0.9–1.2, Hildebrandt et al. (2018) added ing by structure along the line of sight. By combining galaxy VIKING photometry to the KiDS-450 data set, as described in shapes with photometric redshift estimates it is possible to lo- Wright et al. (2018). The resulting cosmological parameter con- cate the redshift at which the gravitational lensing signal orig- straints of this new analysis, dubbed ‘KV450’, are fully con- inates, and hence to map out the growth of large-scale struc- sistent with [KiDS450]. DR4 incorporates the methodology de- ture, an important aspect of the evolution of the Universe and a veloped for KV450 and includes VIKING photometry for all key cosmology probe. Together with KiDS, two other major sur- sources. Of all wide-area surveys, this makes it the one with by veys are engaged in such measurements: the Dark Energy Sur- far the deepest near-IR data. vey (DES; Dark Energy Survey Collaboration 2005)2 and the Though designed for the primary cosmology science case HyperSuprimeCam survey (HSC; Aihara et al. 2018)3, and all ([KiDS450]; Joudaki et al. 2017; van Uitert et al. 2018; Köh- three have reported intermediate cosmology results (Hildebrandt linger et al. 2017; Harnois-Déraps et al. 2017; Amon et al. 2018; et al. 2017, henceforth [KiDS450]; Troxel et al. 2018; Hikage Shan et al. 2018; Martinet et al. 2018; Giblin et al. 2018; As- et al. 2018). Their precision is already such that the measure- gari et al. 2018), KiDS data are also being used for a variety of ments can constrain some parameters in the cosmological model other studies, including the galaxy-halo connection (van Uitert to a level that is comparable to what is achieved from the cos- et al. 2016, 2017), searches for strongly lensed galaxies (Petrillo mic microwave background anisotropies (Planck Collaboration et al. 2019) and quasars (Spiniello et al. 2018; Sergeyev et al. 2018). Since ground-based surveys are limited fundamentally by 2018), solar system objects (Mahlke et al. 2018), photometric the atmospheric disturbance on galaxy shapes and photometry, redshift machine learning method development (Amaro et al. space missions Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011) and later WFIRST 2019; Bilicki et al. 2018), studies of galaxy evolution (Tortora (Spergel et al. 2015) are planned to increase the fidelity of such et al.
Recommended publications
  • GLOBE at Night: Using Sky Quality Meters to Measure Sky Brightness
    GLOBE at Night: using Sky Quality Meters to measure sky brightness This document includes: • How to observe with the SQM o The SQM, finding latitude and longitude, when to observe, taking and reporting measurements, what do the numbers mean, comparing results • Demonstrating light pollution o Background in light pollution and lighting, materials needed for the shielding demo, doing the shielding demo • Capstone activities (and resources) • Appendix: An excel file for multiple measurements CREDITS This document on citizen-scientists using Sky Quality Meters to monitor light pollution levels in their community was a collaborative effort between Connie Walker at the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Chuck Bueter of nightwise.org, Anna Hurst of ASP’s Astronomy from the Ground Up program, Vivian White and Marni Berendsen of ASP’s Night Sky Network and Kim Patten of the International Dark-Sky Association. Observations using the Sky Quality Meter (SQM) The Sky Quality Meters (SQMs) add a new twist to the GLOBE at Night program. They expand the citizen science experience by making it more scientific and more precise. The SQMs allow citizen-scientists to map a city at different locations to identify dark sky oases and even measure changes over time beyond the GLOBE at Night campaign. This document outlines how to make and report SQM observations. Important parts of the SQM ! Push start button here. ! Light enters here. ! Read out numbers here. The SQM Model The SQM-L Model Using the SQM There are two models of Sky Quality Meters. Information on the newer model, the SQM- L, can be found along with the instruction sheet at http://unihedron.com/projects/sqm-l/.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Night Sky Brightness: Methods and Challenges
    Measuring night sky brightness: methods and challenges Andreas H¨anel1, Thomas Posch2, Salvador J. Ribas3,4, Martin Aub´e5, Dan Duriscoe6, Andreas Jechow7,13, Zolt´anKollath8, Dorien E. Lolkema9, Chadwick Moore6, Norbert Schmidt10, Henk Spoelstra11, G¨unther Wuchterl12, and Christopher C. M. Kyba13,7 1Planetarium Osnabr¨uck,Klaus-Strick-Weg 10, D-49082 Osnabr¨uck,Germany 2Universit¨atWien, Institut f¨urAstrophysik, T¨urkenschanzstraße 17, 1180 Wien, Austria tel: +43 1 4277 53800, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 3Parc Astron`omicMontsec, Comarcal de la Noguera, Pg. Angel Guimer`a28-30, 25600 Balaguer, Lleida, Spain 4Institut de Ci`encies del Cosmos (ICCUB), Universitat de Barcelona, C.Mart´ıi Franqu´es 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 5D´epartement de physique, C´egep de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qu´ebec, J1E 4K1, Canada 6Formerly with US National Park Service, Natural Sounds & Night Skies Division, 1201 Oakridge Dr, Suite 100, Fort Collins, CO 80525, USA 7Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany 8E¨otv¨osLor´andUniversity, Savaria Department of Physics, K´arolyi G´asp´ar t´er4, 9700 Szombathely, Hungary 9National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3720 Bilthoven, The Netherlands 10DDQ Apps, Webservices, Project Management, Maastricht, The Netherlands 11LightPollutionMonitoring.Net, Urb. Ve¨ınatVerneda 101 (Bustia 49), 17244 Cass`ade la Selva, Girona, Spain 12Kuffner-Sternwarte,Johann-Staud-Straße 10, A-1160 Wien, Austria 13Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany Abstract Measuring the brightness of the night sky has become an increasingly impor- tant topic in recent years, as artificial lights and their scattering by the Earth’s atmosphere continue spreading around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model to Determine Naked-Eye Limiting Magnitude
    Volume 10 Issue 1 (2021) HS Research A Model to Determine Naked-Eye Limiting Magnitude Dasha Crocker1, Vincent Schmidt1 and Laura Schmidt1 1Bellbrook High School, Bellbrook, OH, USA ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine which variables would be needed to generate a model that predicted the naked eye limiting magnitude on a given night. After background research was conducted, it seemed most likely that wind speed, air quality, skyglow, and cloud cover would contribute to the proposed model. This hypothesis was tested by obtaining local weather data, then determining the naked eye limiting magnitude for the local conditions. This procedure was repeated for the moon cycle of October, then repeated an additional 11 times in November, December, and January. After the initial 30 trials, r values were calculated for each variable that was measured. These values revealed that wind was not at all correlated with the naked eye limiting magnitude, but pollen (a measure of air quality), skyglow, and cloud cover were. After the generation of several models using multiple regression tests, air quality also proved not to affect the naked eye limiting magnitude. It was concluded that skyglow and cloud cover would contribute to a model that predicts naked eye limiting magnitude, proving the original hypothesis to be partially correct. Introduction Humanity has been looking to the stars for thousands of years. Ancient civilizations looked to the stars hoping that they could explain the world around them. Mayans invented shadow casting devices to track the movement of the sun, moon, and planets, while Chinese astronomers discovered Ganymede, one of Jupiter’s moons (Cook, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale
    observer’s log Introducing the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale Excellent? Typical? Urban? Use this nine-step scale to rate the sky conditions at any observing site. By John E. Bortle ow dark is your sky? A Limiting Magnitude Isn’t Enough precise answer to this ques- Amateur astronomers usually judge their tion is useful for comparing skies by noting the magnitude of the observing sites and, more im- faintest star visible to the naked eye. Hportant, for determining whether a site is However, naked-eye limiting magnitude dark enough to let you push your eyes, is a poor criterion. It depends too much telescope, or camera to their theoretical on a person’s visual acuity (sharpness of limits. Likewise, you need accurate crite- eyesight), as well as on the time and ef- ria for judging sky conditions when doc- fort expended to see the faintest possible umenting unusual or borderline obser- stars. One person’s “5.5-magnitude sky” vations, such as an extremely long comet is another’s “6.3-magnitude sky.” More- tail, a faint aurora, or subtle features in over, deep-sky observers need to assess the galaxies. visibility of both stellar and nonstellar ob- On Internet bulletin boards and news- jects. A modest amount of light pollution groups I see many postings from begin- degrades diffuse objects such as comets, ners (and sometimes more experienced nebulae, and galaxies far more than stars. observers) wondering how to evaluate To help observers judge the true dark- the quality of their skies. Unfortunately, ness of a site, I have created a nine-level most of today’s stargazers have never scale.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Release COSMOS Optical and Near-IR Data and Catalog
    Draft version October 22, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 THE FIRST RELEASE COSMOS OPTICAL AND NEAR-IR DATA AND CATALOG⋆ P. Capak1, H. Aussel2,47, M. Ajiki26, H. J. McCracken2,17, B. Mobasher5, N. Scoville1,2, P. Shopbell1, Y. Taniguchi26,45, D. Thompson1,46, S. Tribiano16,36, S. Sasaki1,26,45, A. W. Blain1, M. Brusa13, C. Carilli 6, A. Comastri35, C. M. Carollo8, P. Cassata12, J. Colbert31, R. S. Ellis1, M. Elvis10, M. Giavalisco5, W. Green1, L. Guzzo12, G. Hasinger13, O. Ilbert4, C. Impey14, K. Jahnke25, J. Kartaltepe4, J-P. Kneib15, J. Koda1, A. Koekemoer5, Y. Komiyama43, A. Leauthaud1,15, O. Lefevre15, S. Lilly8, R. Massey1, S. Miyazaki18, T. Murayama26, T. Nagao 43,44, J. A. Peacock32, A. Pickles 33, C. Porciani8, A. Renzini21,34, J. Rhodes1,22, M. Rich23, M. Salvato1, D. B. Sanders4, C. Scarlata8, D. Schiminovich24, E. Schinnerer25, M. Scodeggio38, K. Sheth1,31, Y. Shioya 45, L. A. M. Tasca15, J. E. Taylor1, L. Yan31, G. Zamorani29 Draft version October 22, 2018 ABSTRACT We present imaging data and photometry for the COSMOS survey in 15 photometric bands between 0.3µm and 2.4µm. These include data taken on the Subaru 8.3m telescope, the KPNO and CTIO 4m telescopes, and the CFHT 3.6m telescope. Special techniques are used to ensure that the relative photometric calibration is better than 1% across the field of view. The absolute photometric accuracy from standard star measurements is found to be 6%. The absolute calibration is corrected using galaxy spectra, providing colors accurate to 2% or better.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pan-Starrs1 Surveys K
    Draft version January 31, 2019 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 THE PAN-STARRS1 SURVEYS K. C. Chambers1, E. A. Magnier1, N. Metcalfe2, H. A. Flewelling1, M. E. Huber1, C. Z. Waters1, L. Denneau1, P. W. Draper2, D. Farrow2,7, D. P. Finkbeiner3,4, C. Holmberg1, J. Koppenhoefer7,39 P. A. Price6, A. Rest23, R. P. Saglia7,39, E. F. Schlafly8,9, S. J. Smartt10, W. Sweeney1, R. J. Wainscoat1, W. S. Burgett11, S. Chastel1, T. Grav13, J. N. Heasley14, K. W. Hodapp1, R. Jedicke1, N. Kaiser1, R.-P. Kudritzki1, G. A. Luppino15,16, R. H. Lupton6, D. G. Monet17, J. S. Morgan11, P. M. Onaka1, B. Shiao23, C. W. Stubbs3, J. L. Tonry1, R. White23, E. Banados~ 5,18,19, E. F. Bell 20, R. Bender7,39, E. J. Bernard21, M. Boegner23, F. Boffi23, M.T. Botticella22, A. Calamida23, S. Casertano23, W.-P. Chen24, X. Chen25, S. Cole2, N. Deacon1,5,26, C. Frenk2, A. Fitzsimmons10, S. Gezari 27, V. Gibbs 23, C. Goessl7,39, T. Goggia1, R. Gourgue23, B. Goldman5, P. Grant23, E. K. Grebel28, N.C. Hambly29, G. Hasinger1, A. F. Heavens30 T. M. Heckman13, R. Henderson31, T. Henning5, M. Holman32, U. Hopp7,39, W.-H. Ip24, S. Isani1, M. Jackson23, C.D. Keyes23, A. M. Koekemoer23, R. Kotak10, D. Le23, D. Liska23, K. S. Long23, J.R Lucey2, M. Liu1, N.F. Martin5,33, G. Masci23, B. McLean23, E. Mindel23, P. Misra23, E. Morganson34, D.N.A. Murphy35, A. Obaika23, G. Narayan23 M. A. Nieto-Santisteban23, P. Norberg2,36, J.A. Peacock29, E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pan-STARRS Synthetic Solar System Model: a Tool for Testing and Efficiency Determination of the Moving Object Processing System
    The Pan-STARRS Synthetic Solar System Model: A tool for testing and efficiency determination of the Moving Object Processing System Tommy Grav Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University [email protected] Robert Jedicke Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii [email protected] Larry Denneau Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii [email protected] Steve Chesley Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology [email protected] Matthew J. Holman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics [email protected] Timothy B. Spahr Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics [email protected] March 27, 2008 Submitted to Icarus. Manuscript: 76 pages, with 2 tables and 23 figures. Corresponding author: Tommy Grav Department of Physics and Astronomy Johns Hopkins University 3400 N. Charles St. Baltimore, MD 21218 Phone: (410) 516-7683 Email: [email protected] 2 Abstract We present here the Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System (MOPS) Synthetic Solar System Model (S3M), the first ever attempt at building a com- prehensive flux-limited model of the small bodies in the solar system. The model is made up of synthetic populations of near-Earth objects (NEOs with a sub-population of Earth impactors), the main belt asteroids (MBAs), Trojans of all planets from Venus through Neptune, Centaurs, trans-neptunian objects (classical, resonant and scattered TNOs), long period comets (LPCs), and in- terstellar comets (ICs). All of these populations are complete to a minimum of V = 24:5, corresponding to approximately the expected limiting magnitude for Pan-STARRS'sability to detect moving objects. The only exception to this rule are the NEOs, which are complete to H = 25 (corresponding to objects of about 50 meter in diameter).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Telescope Limiting-Magnitude and Resolution
    Appendix 1: Telescope Limiting-Magnitude and Resolution Listed below are limiting-magnitudes and resolution values for a variety of common-sized ( SIZE in inches) backyard telescopes in use today, ranging from 2- to 14-in. in aperture. (The 2.4-in. entry is the ubiquitous 60 mm refractor, of which there are perhaps more than any other telescope in the world!) Values for the minimum visual magnitude ( MAG .) listed here are for single stars and are only very approximate, since experienced keen-eyed observers may see as much as a full magnitude fainter under excellent sky conditions. Companions to visual double stars—especially those in close proximity to a bright primary—are typically much more dif fi cult to see than is a star of the same magnitude placed alone in the eye- piece fi eld. Among the many variables involved are light pollution, sky conditions, optical quality, mirror and lens coatings, eyepiece design, obstructed or unob- structed optical system, color (spectral type) of the star, and even the age of the observer. Only a few representative limiting magnitudes are given here (in incre- ments of increasing aperture), as an indication of what an observer might typically expect to see in various sized telescopes. Three different values in arc-seconds are listed for resolution, which are for two stars of equal brightness and of about the sixth magnitude. These fi gures differ signi fi cantly for brighter, fainter and, espe- cially, unequal pairs. DAWES is the value based on Dawes’ Limit ( R = 4.56/A), RAYLEIGH on the Rayleigh Criterion ( R = 5.5/D), and MARKOWITZ on Markowitz’s Limit ( R = 6.0/D).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Seven Years of Globe at Night Data
    Birriel et al., JAAVSO Volume 42, 2014 219 Analysis of Seven Years of Globe at Night Data Jennifer J. Birriel Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, Morehead State University, Morehead KY 40351 Constance E. Walker National Optical Astronomical Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719 Cory R. Thornsberry Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Physics, Morehead State University, Morehead KY (current Address, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996) Received April 27, 2012; revised November 4, 2013, November 18, 2013; accepted November 19, 2013 Abstract The Globe at Night (GaN) project website contains seven years of night-sky brightness data contributed by citizen scientists. We perform a statistical analysis of naked-eye limiting magnitudes (NELMs) and find that over the period from 2006 to 2012 global averages of NELMs have remained essentially constant. Observations in which participants reported both NELM and Unihedron Sky Quality Meter (SQM) measurements are compared to a theoretical expression relating night sky surface brightness and NELM: the overall agreement between observed and predicted NELM values based on the reported SQM measurements supports the reliability of GaN data. 1. The Globe at Night (GaN) project The faint band of the Milky Way as seen under a dark sky is very much a part of humanity’s cultural and natural heritage. More than one-fifth of the world population, two-thirds of the United States population, and one-half of the European Union population have already lost naked-eye visibility of the Milky Way (Cinzano et al. 2001). This loss is caused by light pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • How Light Pollution Affects the Stars: Magnitude Readers
    The National Optical Astronomy Observatory’s Dark Skies and Energy Education Program How Light Pollution Affects the Stars: Magnitude Readers (This lesson was adapted from an activity by the International Dark-Sky Association: www.darksky.org.) Grades: 5th – 12th grade Overview: Students each build a “Magnitude Reader”. They use the reader to determine how light pollution affects the visibility of stars and thereby learn the meaning of “limiting magnitude”. The Magnitude Reader has 5 windows or holes numbered 1 through 5. In the 1st hole you can see only the brightest stars. The higher the numbered hole, the fainter the star you can see. To use the Magnitude Reader, students find a constellation like Orion in the night sky and view the stars in the constellation through the holes in the Magnitude Reader. For each star in a drawing of the constellation (like the one of Orion in this activity), the students write down the number of the hole through which they can see the star the faintest. This illustrates the concept of magnitude. Note that for some of the stars on the drawing, the students will not be able to see due to light pollution. Using the faintest star they see (e.g., the limiting magnitude), the students can then estimate how many stars they have lost (e.g., they are unable to see) across their whole sky due to light pollution at their location. Purpose: To help students determine how light pollution affects the visibility of stars and understand the meaning of “limiting magnitude” by using a Magnitude Reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Sky Park Program
    Dark-Sky Park Program (Version 1.31) International Dark-Sky Association 3225 N first Ave - Tucson Arizona 85719 - 520-293-3198 - www.darksky.org To preserve and protect the nighttime environment and our heritage of dark skies through quality outdoor lighting Dark Sky Park Designation Objectives: A To identify and honor protected public lands (national, state, provincial and other parks and notable public lands) with exceptional commitment to, and success in implementing, the ideals of dark sky preservation and/or restoration; B To preserve and/or restore outstanding night skies; C To promote protection of nocturnal habitat, public enjoyment of the night sky and its heritage, and areas ideal for professional and amateur astronomy; D To encourage park administrators to identify dark skies as a valuable resource in need of proactive protection; E To provide international recognition for such parks; F To encourage parks and similar public entities to become environmental leaders on dark sky issues by communicating the importance of dark skies to the general public and surrounding communities, and by providing an example of what is possible. Benefits: Achieving this designation brings recognition of the efforts a park has made towards protecting dark skies. It will raise the awareness of park staff, visitors, and the surrounding community. Designation as an IDA DSP (Dark-Sky Park) entitles the park to display IDA DSP logo in official park publications and promotions, and use of this logo by commercial or other groups within the community when identifying the park area itself (e.g. an organization can say “located in Grand View Park, an IDA DSP” or other words to the same effect).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0805.2366V5 [Astro-Ph] 23 May 2018 Stephen Pietrowicz,17 Rob Pike,66 Philip A
    Draft version May 25, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products Zeljkoˇ Ivezic´,1 Steven M. Kahn,2, 3 J. Anthony Tyson,4 Bob Abel,5 Emily Acosta,2 Robyn Allsman,2 David Alonso,6 Yusra AlSayyad,7 Scott F. Anderson,1 John Andrew,2 James Roger P. Angel,8 George Z. Angeli,9 Reza Ansari,10 Pierre Antilogus,11 Constanza Araujo,2 Robert Armstrong,7 Kirk T. Arndt,6 Pierre Astier,11 Eric´ Aubourg,12 Nicole Auza,2 Tim S. Axelrod,8 Deborah J. Bard,13 Jeff D. Barr,2 Aurelian Barrau,14 James G. Bartlett,12 Amanda E. Bauer,2 Brian J. Bauman,15 Sylvain Baumont,16, 11 Andrew C. Becker,1 Jacek Becla,13 Cristina Beldica,17 Steve Bellavia,18 Federica B. Bianco,19, 20 Rahul Biswas,21 Guillaume Blanc,10, 22 Jonathan Blazek,23, 24 Roger D. Blandford,3 Josh S. Bloom,25 Joanne Bogart,3 Tim W. Bond,13 Anders W. Borgland,13 Kirk Borne,26 James F. Bosch,7 Dominique Boutigny,27 Craig A. Brackett,13 Andrew Bradshaw,4 William Nielsen Brandt,28 Michael E. Brown,29 James S. Bullock,30 Patricia Burchat,3 David L. Burke,3 Gianpietro Cagnoli,31 Daniel Calabrese,2 Shawn Callahan,2 Alice L. Callen,13 Srinivasan Chandrasekharan,32 Glenaver Charles-Emerson,2 Steve Chesley,33 Elliott C. Cheu,34 Hsin-Fang Chiang,17 James Chiang,3 Carol Chirino,2 Derek Chow,13 David R. Ciardi,35 Charles F. Claver,2 Johann Cohen-Tanugi,36 Joseph J.
    [Show full text]