DOCSLIB.ORG

Testing the Relation Between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Testing the Relation Between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Testing the Relation between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior Ronald Thomas Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Thomas, Ronald, "Testing the Relation between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6793. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6793 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Testing the Relation between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior Ronald Thomas, B.A. Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Psychology Natalie Shook, Ph.D., Chair Amy Gentzler, Ph.D. Julie Patrick, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Morgantown, West Virginia 2015 Keywords: Disgust, Disgust Sensitivity, Approach-Avoidance, Behavioral Immune System Copyright 2015 Ronald Thomas iii DISGUST AND APPROACH-AVOIDANCE Abstract Testing the Relation between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior Ronald Thomas The Behavioral Immune System (BIS) is a set of psychological processes that evolved to protect individuals from harmful contaminants and pathogens in the environment (Miller & Maner, 2011; Schaller & Duncan, 2007; Tybur, Lieberman, Kurzban, & DeScioli, 2013). The primary mechanism through which the BIS functions is the emotion of disgust, which causes negative physical and affective reactions that encourage avoidance behavior and serve as a deterrent from approaching potentially harmful stimuli (Schaller & Duncan, 2007). Consequently, disgust is proposed to serve a disease-avoidance mechanism. However, relatively little research has empirically tested the link between disgust and general behavioral avoidance tendencies in the BIS literature. The purpose of this research was to directly test the association between disgust and general avoidance tendencies. The first study was correlational to demonstrate the association between trait levels of disgust sensitivity and avoidance tendencies. Participants completed self-report measures of disgust sensitivity and approach-avoidance tendencies, as well as a performance-based measure of approach-avoidance. Disgust sensitivity was positively correlated with avoidance as assessed by a self-report measure (i.e., the Behavioral Inhibition Scale; Carver & White, 1994) and negatively correlated with the approach of positive, but not negative, stimuli in the performance-based task. In the second study, a disgust induction (i.e., consumption of disgusting flavored jellybeans) was compared to a control condition (i.e., consumption of normally flavored jellybeans) in order to test the causal direction of the relation between disgust and avoidance. However, the induction could not be evaluated on whether disgust was induced. Although the groups acknowledged a difference in taste, there were no differences between the groups in self-reported feelings of disgust, although they differed on approach-avoidance tendencies in BeanFest. The data from Study 2 also replicated the correlational findings in Study 1. Disgust sensitivity was negatively correlated with the approach of positive stimuli in the performance-based task and was positively associated with self-reported avoidance. Across both studies, a consistent pattern emerged; people who were more sensitive to disgust exhibited more general avoidance tendencies. These findings have broad implications for behavioral tendencies across social domains. Those who are higher in disgust sensitivity tend to endorse more cautious and avoidant behavior, not just relative to clearly dangerous stimuli, such as phobias and other overt risks, but to general situations and events unrelated to disease. ii Contents Testing the Relation between Disgust and Approach-Avoidance Behavior .................................................................. 1 Behavioral Immune System .................................................................................................................................... 1 Disgust .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Avoidance Behavior ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Present Research ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Study 1 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Method ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Participants........................................................................................................................................................ 12 Measures ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Procedure ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 Results .................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................................... 21 Study 2 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Method ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Participants........................................................................................................................................................ 23 Measures ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 Manipulation ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 Procedure ........................................................................................................................................................... 24 Results .................................................................................................................................................................... 25 General Discussion ................................................................................................................................................ 30 References .................................................................................................................................................................. 35 Tables and Figures..................................................................................................................................................... 38 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................................................. 47 Appendix B .................................................................................................................................................................. 50 Three Domain Disgust Scale ............................................................................................................................ 50 Disgust Scale-Revise.......................................................................................................................................... 52 Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised .......................................................................................... 55 Contamination Fear Subscale .......................................................................................................................... 56 Perceived Vulnerability to Disease .................................................................................................................. 57 PANAS ............................................................................................................................................................... 60 Demographics Questions .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Fun Are Your Meetings? Investigating the Relationship Between Humor Patterns in Team Interactions and Team Performance
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Psychology Faculty Publications Department of Psychology 11-2014 How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock Vrije University Amsterdam Joseph A. Allen University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub Part of the Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale and Allen, Joseph A., "How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance" (2014). Psychology Faculty Publications. 118. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/118 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Psychology at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In press at Journal of Applied Psychology How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock1 & Joseph A. Allen2 1 VU University Amsterdam 2 University of Nebraska at Omaha Acknowledgements The initial data collection for this study was partially supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation, which is gratefully acknowledged. We appreciate the support by Simone Kauffeld and the helpful feedback by Steve Kozlowski. Abstract Research on humor in organizations has rarely considered the social context in which humor occurs. One such social setting that most of us experience on a daily basis concerns the team context. Building on recent theorizing about the humor—performance association in teams, this study seeks to increase our understanding of the function and effects of humor in team interaction settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring-And-Summer-Fun-Pack.Pdf
    Spring & Summer FUN PACK BUILD OUR KIDS' SUCCESS Find many activities for kids in Kindergarten through Grade 9 to get moving and stay busy during the warmer months. Spring & Summer FUN PACK WHO IS THIS BOOKLET FOR? 1EVERYONE – kids, parents, camps, childcare providers, and anyone that is involved with kids this summer. BOKS has compiled a Spring & Summer Fun Pack that is meant to engage kids and allow them to “Create Their Own Adventure of Fun” for the warmer weather months. This package is full of easy to follow activities for kids to do independently, as a family, or for camp counselors/childcare providers to engage kids on a daily basis. We have included a selection of: BOKS Bursts (5–10 minute activity breaks) BOKS lesson plans - 30 minutes of fun interactive lessons including warm ups, skill work, games and nutrition bits with video links Crafts Games Recipes HOW DOES THIS WORK? Choose two or three activities daily from the selection outlined on page 4: 1. Get physically active with Bursts and/or BOKS fitness classes. 2. Be creative with cooking and crafts. 3. Have fun outdoors (or indoors), try our games! How do your kids benefit? • Give kids time to play and have fun. • Get kids moving toward their 60 minutes of recommended daily activity. • Build strong bones and muscles with simple fitness skills. • Reduce symptoms of anxiety. • Encourage a love of physical activity through engaging games. • We encourage your kids to have fun creating their own BOKS adventure. WHO WE ARE… BOKS (Build Our Kids' Success) is a FREE physical activity program designed to get kids active and establish a lifelong commitment to health and fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • DISGUST: Features and SAWCHUK and Clinical Implications
    Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2005, pp. 932-962 OLATUNJIDISGUST: Features AND SAWCHUK and Clinical Implications DISGUST: CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES, SOCIAL MANIFESTATIONS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS BUNMI O. OLATUNJI University of Massachusetts CRAIG N. SAWCHUK University of Washington School of Medicine Emotions have been a long–standing cornerstone of research in social and clinical psychology. Although the systematic examination of emotional processes has yielded a rather comprehensive theoretical and scientific literature, dramatically less empirical attention has been devoted to disgust. In the present article, the na- ture, experience, and other associated features of disgust are outlined. We also re- view the domains of disgust and highlight how these domains have expanded over time. The function of disgust in various social constructions, such as cigarette smoking, vegetarianism, and homophobia, is highlighted. Disgust is also becoming increasingly recognized as an influential emotion in the onset, maintenance, and treatment of various phobic states, Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder, and eating disorders. In comparison to the other emotions, disgust offers great promise for fu- ture social and clinical research efforts, and prospective studies designed to improve our understanding of disgust are outlined. The nature, structure, and function of emotions have a rich tradition in the social and clinical psychology literature (Cacioppo & Gardner, 1999). Although emotion theorists have contested over the number of discrete emotional states and their operational definitions (Plutchik, 2001), most agree that emotions are highly influential in organizing thought processes and behavioral tendencies (Izard, 1993; John- Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by NIMH NRSA grant 1F31MH067519–1A1 awarded to Bunmi O.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics K Through 6
    Building fun and creativity into standards-based learning Mathematics K through 6 Ron De Long, M.Ed. Janet B. McCracken, M.Ed. Elizabeth Willett, M.Ed. © 2007 Crayola, LLC Easton, PA 18044-0431 Acknowledgements Table of Contents This guide and the entire Crayola® Dream-Makers® series would not be possible without the expertise and tireless efforts Crayola Dream-Makers: Catalyst for Creativity! ....... 4 of Ron De Long, Jan McCracken, and Elizabeth Willett. Your passion for children, the arts, and creativity are inspiring. Thank you. Special thanks also to Alison Panik for her content-area expertise, writing, research, and curriculum develop- Lessons ment of this guide. Garden of Colorful Counting ....................................... 6 Set representation Crayola also gratefully acknowledges the teachers and students who tested the lessons in this guide: In the Face of Symmetry .............................................. 10 Analysis of symmetry Barbi Bailey-Smith, Little River Elementary School, Durham, NC Gee’s-o-metric Wisdom ................................................ 14 Geometric modeling Rob Bartoch, Sandy Plains Elementary School, Baltimore, MD Patterns of Love Beads ................................................. 18 Algebraic patterns Susan Bivona, Mount Prospect Elementary School, Basking Ridge, NJ A Bountiful Table—Fair-Share Fractions ...................... 22 Fractions Jennifer Braun, Oak Street Elementary School, Basking Ridge, NJ Barbara Calvo, Ocean Township Elementary School, Oakhurst, NJ Whimsical Charting and
    [Show full text]
  • The Distancing-Embracing Model of the Enjoyment of Negative Emotions in Art Reception
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2017), Page 1 of 63 doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000309, e347 The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception Winfried Menninghaus1 Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Valentin Wagner Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Julian Hanich Department of Arts, Culture and Media, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Eugen Wassiliwizky Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Thomas Jacobsen Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany [email protected] Stefan Koelsch University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway [email protected] Abstract: Why are negative emotions so central in art reception far beyond tragedy? Revisiting classical aesthetics in the light of recent psychological research, we present a novel model to explain this much discussed (apparent) paradox. We argue that negative emotions are an important resource for the arts in general, rather than a special license for exceptional art forms only. The underlying rationale is that negative emotions have been shown to be particularly powerful in securing attention, intense emotional involvement, and high memorability, and hence is precisely what artworks strive for. Two groups of processing mechanisms are identified that conjointly adopt the particular powers of negative emotions for art’s purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gay Science (`La Gaya Scienza')
    Cambridge University Press 0521631599 - The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs Friedrich Nietzsche Excerpt More information The Gay Science R`La gaya scienza') This house is my own and here I dwell, I've never aped nothing from no one and ± laugh at each master, mark me well, who at himself has not poked fun. Over my front door. The title is a translation into German Rin our edition, into English) of the ProvencËal subtitle. Gaya scienza R`joyful, cheerful, or gay science') was a term used by the troubadours in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries to refer to the art of poetry. In Ecce Homo Nietzsche writes that he has used the term gaya scienza here to designate the speci®c unity of `singer, knight, and free spirit' which was characteristic of early ProvencËal culture. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521631599 - The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs Friedrich Nietzsche Excerpt More information Preface to the second edition 1 This book might need more than one preface; and in the end there would still be room for doubting whether someone who has not experienced something similar could, by means of prefaces, be brought closer to the experiences of this book. It seems to be written in the language of the wind that brings a thaw: it contains high spirits, unrest, contradiction, and April weather, so that one is constantly reminded of winter's nearness as well as of the triumph over winter that is coming, must come, perhaps has already come.
    [Show full text]
  • Activating the Biological and Behavioral Immune Systems Julia Christensen Hamline University
    Hamline University DigitalCommons@Hamline Departmental Honors Projects College of Liberal Arts Spring 2015 Activating the Biological and Behavioral Immune Systems Julia Christensen Hamline University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/dhp Part of the Biological Psychology Commons, and the Cognitive Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Christensen, Julia, "Activating the Biological and Behavioral Immune Systems" (2015). Departmental Honors Projects. 37. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/dhp/37 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts at DigitalCommons@Hamline. It has been accepted for inclusion in Departmental Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Hamline. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Running head: ACTIVATING THE BEHAVIORAL IMMUNE SYSTEM 1 Activating the Biological and Behavioral Immune Systems Julia M. Christensen Hamline University ACTIVATING THE BEHAVIORAL IMMUNE SYSTEM 2 Abstract Psychology recognizes two distinct facets of the immune system: the biological immune system (BIO), covering all processes of the typical immune system, and the behavioral immune system (BEH), a set of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to environmental stimuli. Research on this dual immune system indicates that each is capable of influencing the other (Schaller & Park, 2011). For example, perception of illness in others can activate the sympathetic nervous system ( Schaller, Miller, Gervais, Yager, & Chen, 2010 ). Furthermore, evidence suggests that these two systems are capable of influencing moral judgment (Inbar, Pizarro, & Bloom, 2008). This study aims to further the overall understanding of the BEH and the manner in which it influences the BIO. Participants were recruited from college psychology courses in exchange for extra credit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Behavioural Immune System Is a Product of Cultural Evolution
    The human behavioural immune system is a product of cultural evolution Authors: Edwin S. Dalmaijer 1*, Thomas Armstrong 2 Affiliations: 1 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, United Kingdom. 2 Department of Psychology, Whitman College, 345 Boyer Ave, Walla Walla, WA, 99362, USA. *Correspondence to: Dr Edwin Dalmaijer, [email protected] Pre-print note: This manuscript has been submitted to a scientific journal. It has not passed peer review yet. 1 Dalmaijer & Armstrong – Evolution of the behavioural immune system To avoid disease 1, humans show far greater contamination sensitivity and hygienic behaviour compared to our closest living relatives 2,3, likely due to our increased propensity to experience disgust 4. While contemporary theories argue disgust is a genetic adaptation 5,6, there is surprisingly little evidence to support this claim. Here, we simulated 100 000 years of evolution in human hunter-gatherers to test a wide variety of theoretical models. Our results indicate that natural selection for monogenic or polygenic pathogen-avoidance traits is plausible. However, the cultural inter-generational transmission of such traits operated more quickly in realistic scenarios, and continued to work even when artificially constrained. In the absence of reliable empirical data, our computational work supports the hypothesis that cultural evolution outpaced its biological counterpart to select health-improving behaviours that benefited survival. This study serves not only as evidence of cultural evolution of the behavioural immune system, but is also an illustration of emerging theories that paint cognitive mechanisms as socially transmitted rather than biologically hardwired functions 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours Journal Item How to cite: Sarabian, Cecile; Curtis, Val and McMullan, Rachel (2018). Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1751), article no. 20170256. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2018 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Accepted Manuscript Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0256 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. article template Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. doi:10.1098/not yet assigned Evolution of pathogen and parasite avoidance behaviours Cecile Sarabiana, 1, Valerie Curtisb, Rachel McMullanc a Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, 41-2 Kanrin, Inuyama 484-8506, Japan, CS, 0000-0002-2225-8702 b Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT UK ORCID ID 0000-0001-8994-2878 c School of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 2AA, UK ORCID ID 0000-0003-2677- 8016 Keywords: disease prevention, hygiene, behavioural immune system, disgust, pathogen avoidance, parasite avoidance 1 Abstract 0 1 All free-living animals are subject to intense selection pressure from parasites and 2 pathogens resulting in behavioural adaptations that can help potential hosts to avoid falling 3 prey to parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetic Mind This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Aesthetic Mind Philosophy and Psychology
    The Aesthetic Mind This page intentionally left blank The Aesthetic Mind Philosophy and Psychology EDITED BY Elisabeth Schellekens and Peter Goldie 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX26DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # the several contributors 2011 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn ISBN 978–0–19–969151–7 13579108642 Contents List of Figures viii Notes on Contributors ix Introduction 1 Elisabeth Schellekens and Peter Goldie Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Pathogen Avoidance Adaptations
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Human pathogen avoidance adaptations 1 2 Joshua M Tybur and Debra Lieberman Over the past few decades, researchers have become [10,11,12 ], and antipathy toward homosexuals [13], the increasingly interested in the adaptations guiding the obese [14,15], the elderly [16] and the disabled [17]. avoidance of disease-causing organisms. Here we discuss the latest developments in this area, including a recently developed Here we discuss how considerations of the information information-processing model of the adaptations underlying processing mechanisms underlying pathogen avoidance pathogen avoidance. We argue that information-processing adaptations can inform when pathogen-neutralizing models like the one presented here can both increase our behaviors are relaxed versus engaged. Work on the emo- understanding of how individuals trade-off pathogen tion disgust — perhaps the most intuitive aspect of our avoidance against other fitness relevant goals and elucidate the pathogen avoidance psychology — provides an illustra- nature of individual differences in pathogen avoidance. With tive example. respect to pathogen disgust in particular, we show how contact avoidance can be traded-off against other tasks, including food Disgust: function versus mechanism choice, cooperation, and mate choice. Armed with the germ theory of disease, several 20th and Addresses 21st century scientists noted that many objects that elicit 1 Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, VU University disgust also reliably house pathogens [18–21]. This, in Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081BT, The Netherlands concert with the behaviors associated with disgust (e.g., 2 Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables FL proximal avoidance and rejection), straightforwardly im- 33124, United States plied to many scholars that disgust has a function — to Corresponding author: Tybur, Joshua M ([email protected]) neutralize infectious disease threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Perception and Control of Vehicle Roll Tilt in Hyper-Gravity
    Human Perception and Control of Vehicle Roll Tilt in Hyper-Gravity By Torin Kristofer Clark B.S. Aerospace Engineering University of Colorado at Boulder, 2008 S.M. Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2013 © 2013 Torin Clark. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT and The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in any part medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ____________________________________________________________ Torin K. Clark Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics August 22, 2013 Accepted by: __________________________________________________________________ Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 2 Human Perception and Control of Vehicle Roll Tilt in Hyper-Gravity By Torin Kristofer Clark DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Certified by: ___________________________________________________________________ Laurence R. Young Apollo Program Professor of Astronautics Professor of Health Sciences and Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Thesis Committee Chair Certified by: ___________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]