DOCSLIB.ORG

Limited Phase 1 ESA and Phase 2 ESA, Eastern Portion of New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Limited Phase 1 ESA and Phase 2 ESA, Eastern Portion of New Limited Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment and Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment Eastern Portion of New Brighton Park, Vancouver, BC Prepared for: Port Metro Vancouver, Habitat Enhancement Program 100 The Pointe – 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C3T4 Prepared by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc. 18th Floor, 4730 Kingsway Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6 File: 302-035.04 August 20, 2015 PMV – Habitat Enhancement Program Hemmera Limited Phase 1 and 2 ESA – New Brighton Park - i - August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (Hemmera) was retained by Port Metro Vancouver (PMV) Habitat Enhancement Program (HEP) to conduct a limited Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and a Phase 2 ESA for the eastern portion of New Brighton Park, in Vancouver, BC (the ‘Site’). Based on information provided by PMV, an opportunity exists to create fish and wildlife habitat by creating a wetland habitat feature on the east side of the New Brighton Park (the ‘Project’). The majority of the current Project area falls within a single parcel. The portion of the park for which the Project is planned for is leased to the City of Vancouver by PMV, under lease reference 1-01-00444. A Stage 1 Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) was completed at the Site by Keystone Environmental Ltd (Keystone) in May 1997. Based on those findings, a subsequent Stage 2 PSI was completed by Keystone in July 1997. Both phases of work were completed for the City of Vancouver. The objectives of this limited Phase 1 ESA was to update the environmental conditions at the Site since the previous PSIs were completed in May/July 1997, and identify areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) and potential contaminants of concern (PCOCs) associated with present and/or historical on and off-Site activities that may have impacted environmental media at the Site. Also, the work is being completed to document soil and groundwater quality in advance of potential construction works planned for the Project. Information reviewed indicates that the original shoreline was located approximately 150 metres (m) south of its present location. Fill material used to reclaim this intertidal zone is of unknown quality/origin. As such, one on-Site APEC has been identified through the Phase 1 ESA and is discussed in Table ES-1 below. Table ES-1 Summary of APEC and PCOCs APEC Source Comments PCOCs Media There has been extensive intertidal zone infilling of the north end of the Petroleum Fill Material of park, beginning in the early-1960s. Hydrocarbons (VOCs Soil and 1 unknown incl. BTEX/VPH, EPH, Information reviewed indicates that the groundwater quality/origin original shoreline was located PAHs, LEPH, HEPH), approximately 150 metres south of its metals present location. Notes: APEC = Area of Potential Environmental Concern PCOCs = Potential Contaminants of Concern VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds BTEX = Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes VPH = Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons EPH = Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons LEPH/HEPH = Light/Heavy Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons PAH = Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PMV – Habitat Enhancement Program Hemmera Limited Phase 1 and 2 ESA – New Brighton Park - ii - August 2015 Based on the Phase 1 ESA, Hemmera conducted a Phase 2 ESA to assess soil and groundwater in the vicinity of the APEC and proposed habitat enhancement project. A total of eleven boreholes were advanced at the Site, with four completed as monitoring wells. Soil and groundwater samples were submitted for analysis of PCOCs listed in Table ES-1. The soil analytical data was evaluated using the CCME Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health, Park Land Use (PL). Groundwater data was evaluated using the CCME Canadian Water Quality Guidelines (CWQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (marine), including a ten-fold dilution. Soil and groundwater data collected at the Site was also evaluated using the Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR) Park Land (PL) use standards to CSR Aquatic Life (AW marine) standards, respectively, for comparison purposes only. The following is a summary of the Phase 2 ESA investigation results. Table ES-2 Summary Phase 1 and 2 ESA Results APEC Description Results COCs Fill Material of Soil > CSR PL, CCME RL/PL Soil: copper, lead, zinc 1 unknown Groundwater > BC CSR AW, Groundwater: LEPHw, naphthalene, quality/origin CCME MAL(x10) phenanthrene, and pyrene Notes: APEC = Area of Potential Environmental Concern COCs = Contaminants of Concern DW = Drinking Water standards/AW = Aquatic Life standards Based on the above results, the Phase 2 ESA identified elevated concentrations of metals in soil exceeding both the Federal guidelines and Provincial standards. In groundwater, elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons exceeding the applicable Federal guidelines, as well as Provincial standards (used for comparison purposes) within the footprint of the proposed Project, were identified. Additional work is required to fully delineate the contaminated soil and groundwater within the Project area. Furthermore, if excavated soil requires off-site disposal as part of the future/potential construction activities, soils with concentrations exceeding Soil Relocation standards would require disposal at an appropriately licensed landfill facility, or they would require a Contaminated Soil Relocation Agreement (CSRA) if relocated to property under Provincial jurisdiction. PMV – Habitat Enhancement Program Hemmera Limited Phase 1 and 2 ESA – New Brighton Park - iii - August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 1 2.0 LIMITED PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 2 2.1 SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 LAND TITLE INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 2 2.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFICIAL GEOLOGY ................................................................................ 3 2.4 SITE HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.5 REGULATORY INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 5 2.5.1 BC MOE Site Registry ........................................................................................... 5 2.5.2 Federal Contaminated Site Search ........................................................................ 5 2.5.3 Water Well Search ................................................................................................. 6 2.6 SITE VISIT ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.6.1 Ground Observations ............................................................................................. 6 2.6.2 Building Observations ............................................................................................ 7 2.6.3 Current Surrounding Land Use .............................................................................. 7 2.7 PHASE 1 ESA CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 7 3.0 PHASE 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ...................................................................... 8 3.1 SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Soil ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1.1 Federal Guidelines ............................................................................. 10 3.2.1.2 Provincial Standards .......................................................................... 10 3.2.2 Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 10 3.2.2.1 Federal Standards ............................................................................. 10 3.2.2.2 Provincial Standards .......................................................................... 11 3.3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 11 3.3.1 Soil Stratigraphy and Drilling Observations ......................................................... 11 3.3.2 Groundwater Monitoring ...................................................................................... 12 3.4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 12 PMV – Habitat Enhancement Program Hemmera Limited Phase 1 and 2 ESA – New Brighton Park - iv - August 2015 3.4.1 Soil Results .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • We Returned. Now He Mouth. Our Older Relatives Are Gone Mouths. Now a Rocket of Words Bursts Dress, Our Dress of More Shape
    returned. We went: we returned. Now he mouth. Our older relatives are gone mouths. Now a rocket of words bursts dress, our dress of more shape. Now eople who donate faces and tongues. ow we run our fingers over their fingers uins we’ve burst too from the terrestri- rstand cloth, home, anything. Are we ister? We can’t yet participate in lost g. Now we were born complex, messy, ards and mats. Our faces now model ves. Now we have or own a shelf. We ches out in a continual thin plane. Our ns dirty water, plants, coins, unraveled e necessary. We’re speaking for the air e black branches, the objects covered the metal fence, some spatial confu- ve gently as the prepositions. What is s better than this. Deep in our doubt a in one place yet move like blackbirds. Occasional Work and Seven Walks from the Office for Soft Architecture Lisa Robertson clear cut press Astoria © 2003 Clear Cut Press and Lisa Robertson All rights reserved. Designed by Tae Won Yu Production and layout by Robin Mitchell Copyedited by Viola Funk and Allison Dubinsky Color Separations by Scan Lab Printed and Bound by Toppan Printing Company America OCCASIONAL WORK AND SEVEN WALKS FROM THE OFFICE OF SOFT ARCHITECTURE / Lisa Robertson ISBN 0-9723234-3-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2003111519 Photographs not otherwise cited in the text are reproduced with permis- sion from the following sources: pp. 6-11: © Andreas Pauly. Photos of Petra Blaisse’s curtains for the Mick Jagger Centre, Dartford Grammar School for Boys, Kent, England.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Plan for Hastings Park
    1 RACECOURSE BARNS 20 NEW BRIGHTON PARK • Double-decker barns with approximately 300 stalls to replace existing • Safer and more convenient connections to Hastings Park makes this barns place great for biking, running, dog walking, or hanging out at the beach 2 RACECOURSE INFIELD 21 SALT WATER MARSH • Infield repurposed for surface parking for up to approximately 1100 cars • Mouth of the daylighted stream set below grade of racetrack in order to maintain views and reduce noise • Landscaped with marsh plants, pathways and boardwalks impact 3 NORTHWEST PARKING 22 TUNNEL CONNECTION • Either surface or structured parking with approximately 700 to 2000 • Retrofitted existing tunnel for daylighted creek and pedestrian-only stalls to replace spaces removed during park redevelopment access 4 MILLER PLAZA 23 CREEKWAY PARK • Day-to-day vehicle access and passenger drop-off area • Greenway trail alongside meandering day-lighted stream • A pedestrian-only space for performances and displays during festivals • Additional parking and events 24 LONG TERM PEDESTRIAN / CYCLIST OVERPASS 5 FESTIVAL PLAZA • Pedestrian and cyclist overpass spanning McGill Street • A new urban heart of the park featuring: comfortable seating, public art, high-quality paving and lighting where on can grab a coffee, access Wi-Fi, 25 SHORT TERM TUNNEL RETROFIT read a book, chat with friends, or play in the water fountain • Vehicle lanes reduced to accommodate both pedestrians and bicyclist • Flexible indoor and outdoor space for community festivals, special events • Enhanced
    [Show full text]
  • George Black — Early Pioneer Settler on the Coquitlam River
    George Black — Early Pioneer Settler on the Coquitlam River Researched and written by Ralph Drew, Belcarra, BC, December 2018. The ‘Colony of British Columbia’ was proclaimed at Fort Langley on November 19th,1858. In early 1859, Colonel Richard Clement Moody, RE, selected the site for the capital of the colony on the north side of the Fraser River where the river branches. The Royal Engineers established their camp at ‘Sapperton’ and proceeded to layout the future townsite of ‘Queensborough’ (later ‘New Westminster’). On July 17th, 1860, ‘New Westminster’ incorporated to become the first municipality in Western Canada. During the winter of 1858–59, the Fraser River froze over for several months and Colonel Moody realized his position when neither supply boat nor gun-boat could come to his aid in case of an attack. As a consequence, Colonel Moody built a “road” to Burrard Inlet in the summer of 1859 as a military expediency, in order that ships might be accessible via salt water. The “road” was initially just a pack trail that was built due north from ‘Sapperton’ in a straight line to Burrard Inlet. In 1861, the pack trail was upgraded to a wagon road ― known today as ‘North Road’. (1) The ‘Pitt River Road’ from New Westminster to ‘Pitt River Meadows’ was completed in June 1862. (2) In the summer of 1859, (3)(4) the first European family to settle in the Coquitlam area arrived on the schooner ‘Rob Roy’ on the west side of the Pitt River to the area known as ‘Pitt River Meadows’ (today ‘Port Coquitlam’) — Alexander McLean (1809–1889), his wife (Jane), and their two small boys: Alexander (1851–1932) and Donald (1856–1930).
    [Show full text]
  • Hastings Park
    NEW BR IGH TO N RO AD Burrard Inlet CO MM I SS IO N E R PORTSIDE BIKEWAY S T R E E T New Brighton Park PORTSIDE BIKEWAY NEW BR IGHT ON R RACECOURSE OAD TO PORTSIDE BIKEWAY GATE MCGILL STREET 8 TO PORTSIDE BIKEWAY MCGILL STREET CREEKWAY PARK Lot 8 RENFREW ST PNE Tech Services GATE 7 ETON STREET Lot 7 PACIFIC COLISEUM GATE 6 CAMBRIDGE STREET Childcare Centre Horseman’s Lot Callister BRIDGEWAY ST Park Hastings Racecourse GATE Pacific & Slots 9 OXFORD STREET Coliseum GATE STREET BRIDGEWAY PNE OPERATIONS & VANCOUVER GIANTS 5 PNE Operations PNE Human Resources Lot 9 TO SUNRISE ROLLERLAND BIKEWAY TO BURNABY MILLER BIKEWAYS DUNDAS STREET DRIVE 4 AGRODOME GATE LIVESTOCK BUILDING Celebration (HIGHWAY 1) (HIGHWAY Plaza PNE AMPHITHEATRE TRANS-CANADA HWY TRANS-CANADA TRIUMPH STREET Italian Lot 12 GATE Gardens THE PARADE TO CASSIAR 11 BIKEWAY THE GREEN TO SUNRISE BIKEWAY PANDORA STREET CASSIAR BIKEWAY EE PLATEAU PNE FORUM 2 GATE ALL PARK Empire E PNE Administration TH Lot 2 HIGHWAY 1 EASTBOUND Fields > PNE The FRANKLIN STREET Forum Garden Sanctuary Auditorium CASSIAR STREET REFNREW STREET PLAYLAND ENTRANCE MOMIJI GARDEN > HIGHWAY 1 WESTBOUND TO CASSIAR BIKEWAY 1 MAIN THE SANCTUARY 15 EAST HASTINGS STREET 14 HASTINGS ST PLAYLAND 13 EMPIRE FIELD 12 EAST HASTINGS STREET GATE GATE GATE GATE GATE Hastings Community TO ADANAC Centre BIKEWAY Hastings Community Park Lot 16 WINDERMERE ST LILLOOET STREET LILLOOET EAST PENDER STREET ADANAC BIKEWAY CASSIAR STREET Welcome to Hastings Park LEGEND CONTACT Connecting City Bikeways Parking Slots Soccer PNE General Inquiries/Reception Phone: 604.253.2311 Park Greenways–Permanent Pacific National Exhibition Oces Gardens Swimming Pool Park Greenways–Temporary Washroom Amphitheatre Playground After Hours: Trans Canada Trail Restaurant Volleyball Fitness/Training City of Vancouver Park Board: 3-1-1 vancouverparks.ca Translink Bus Stop Racecourse Tennis Pump Track.
    [Show full text]
  • New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project
    HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM: NEW BRIGHTON PARK SHORELINE HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT Project Description Submitted to: Port Metro Vancouver Planning and Development 100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C 3T4 Prepared by: Port Metro Vancouver Habitat Enhancement Program 100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C 3T4 Revised: December 2015 (REV 1) Port Metro Vancouver - HEP Habitat Enhancement Program New Brighton Park – Project Description - i - December 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 PROPONENT INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 2 RATIONALE .................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 HABITAT BANKING ................................................................................................................. 3 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................... 4 SITE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................ 5 CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... 6 6.1 LAND USE AND NAVIGATION SETTING ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inspired by Nature
    AUGUST 2018 SITELINESLandscape Architecture in British Columbia Inspired by Nature Inspired by Nature | MVRP : Protecting natural areas and connecting people to nature | We Must Remember The Importance oƒ Native Plants | Nature as Culture: increasing access to nature in Vancouver | How Nature can change the Urban Environment | CSLA Fellows Profile: Bruce Hemstock, Kim Perry Landscape Structures’ unique design and manufacturing capabilities allow them to combine the adventure and wonder of nature with the durability, safety, and low maintenance of high-quality inclusive play equipment. Nature-themed playgrounds keep kids active and engaged while they are learning about the beauty and complexities of the natural world around them. At Habitat Systems our mission is to create a play experience that jibes with your vision. With incredible themed capabilities, countless colour options, and dedicated in-house designers, we’re ready to assist on your next project. Contact Habitat Systems today to start your project. habitat-systems.com | [email protected] | Toll Free 1 (866) 422-4828 450–355 Burrard St. Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 T 604.682.5610 TF 855.682.5610 (Canada and US) E [email protected] I [email protected] W www.bcsla.org I www.sitelines.org PRESIDENT Stephen Vincent Inspired PRESIDENT ELECT Yolanda Leung BY NATURE PAST PRESIDENT Scott Watson Guest Editor — Margot Long, MBCSLA, FCSLA REGISTRAR Patrick Harrison Principal, PWL Partnership Landscape TREASURER Wai-Sue Louie Architects Inc. DIRECTORS Debra Barnes Teri Cantin , our office did a Katherine Dunster Some years ago Illarion Gallant visioning session to help define our Liane McKenna office and our direction.
    [Show full text]
  • BCMEA President & CEO Terry Duggan Announces March 2019
    BCMEA President & CEO Terry Duggan Announces March 2019 Retirement BCMEA President and CEO Terry Duggan and BCMEA Senior Vice President Mike Leonard Following a well respected and distinguished 31-year career with the British Columbia Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) President and CEO, Terry Duggan, has announced his retirement effective March 31, 2019. Devoted to the BCMEA and the marine industry, Terry leaves a legacy of leadership that focused on collective bargaining with both longshore and foremen unions, pension and benefit administration, finance and audit, labour legislation and regulations, corporate governance and risk, employment equity and government relations. The Board of Directors for the BCMEA is pleased Follow the BCMEA to announce that after the conclusion of a rigorous selection and succession planning process, current on social media Senior Vice President Employee Relations, Dispatch and Corporate Secretary, Mike Leonard, has been selected as Terry’s successor. Mike is a highly effective Industrial Relations executive with over 25 years of diverse experience. (continued) We’re looking for your good news stories to share! Please submit to Lauren Chan: [email protected] 500 – 349 Railway Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6A 1A4 604.688.1155 www.bcmea.com November 15, 2018 The BCMEA Bulletin November 15, 2018 BCMEA President & CEO Terry Duggan Announces March 2019 Retirement (continued) He was recruited in 2001 and has been an active participant in industry bargaining since 2002 and Association spokesperson since 2008 where he also became Vice President, Labour Relations. Mike’s 18 years of extensive experience at the BCMEA and deep understanding as to where the Association needs to go, position him to successfully lead the organization into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project Discussion Paper
    Port Metro Vancouver and Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation Proposed New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project Preliminary Design Public Consultation, November 2 –16, 2015 Discussion Paper and Feedback Form View of New Brighton Park facing west Learn More And Provide Feedback Engagement Process – The purpose of this discussion paper is to provide information about the proposed New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project. It is designed to gather feedback from communities, stakeholders What We’ve Heard and the public and includes a feedback form with questions about preliminary design options for the So Far proposed project. There were 285 participant The Engagement Program Includes: interactions during Conceptual Design Public Consultation • Discussion Paper and Feedback Form (August 26 to September 9, 2015). • Online Feedback Form Participants expressed support • Two Public Information Sessions for, and interest in, the project, particularly related to recreational How to Participate access, wildlife, and educational features. Many participants indicated Attend a Public Date Tuesday, November 3, 2015 Saturday, November 7, 2015 the importance of the dog off- Information Session Time 5:00 PM – 8:00 PM 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM leash area, and of keeping dogs Hastings Room, PNE New Brighton Park (2901 E. Hastings Street) Biologist-led tours of the separate from the habitat. Input Location Enter Gate 2 (Renfrew Street), walk proposed project site at from Conceptual Design Public 1:30 PM and 2:30 PM. east past the Forum. The Hastings Consultation has been considered in Room will be on the right. design refinements included in this Read the Discussion Paper and Online at vancouver.ca/newbrightonsaltmarsh discussion paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Swimming Pools
    Natural Swimming Pools The Future of Public Swimming without Chlorine March 2016 An Introduction to Natural Swimming Pools HCMA Architecture + Design 1A Report on Natural Swimming Pools | 2 Cover: Sectional schematic of proposed natural pool conversion for New Brighton Pool. Image courtesy of PWL Partnership Above: Naturerlebnisbad Bingerbrück Bingen, Germany, Polyplan GmbH INTRODUCTION Natural Swimming Pools are defined as pools that use naturally occurring biological water filtration and treatment methods to provide MAIN CHARACTERISTICS pure and clean bathing facilities that mirror natural bodies of water, OF A NATURAL SWIMMING without the use of chemical treatment. POOL: It is a contained and Water quality in these pools depends on ecological conditions, frequency recirculated vessel of use and the biological system used. Impurities introduced into the pool are eliminated firstly through natural filtration, such as gravel screens, and No chemicals or devices then through biological purification using a ‘regeneration zone’ housing are used to sterilize or plant material. disinfect the water The pool conforms to The treatment method used in natural pools is a naturally occurring, conventional swimming safe and sustainable alternative to mechanical and chemical treatment pool code with respect to commonly used in the majority of indoor and outdoor pools worldwide. safety regulations Natural Swimming Pool systems have been successfully applied to public e.g. depth, configuration, and private new-build pools in addition to the conversion of existing access, egress, etc. chemically treated pool facilities. HCMA Architecture + Design A Report on Natural Swimming Pools | 3 Natural Pools Globally Europe Germany Canada 20,000 100 1 public/private natural public natural pools public natural pool pools (almost) The first natural pools appeared in Austria and Germany in the 1980’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Ecological Conditions at Proposed New Brighton Park Habitat Enhancement Project PMV Habitat Enhancement Program
    Existing Ecological Conditions at Proposed New Brighton Park Habitat Enhancement Project PMV Habitat Enhancement Program Prepared for: Port Metro Vancouver 100 The Pointe, 999 Canada Place Vancouver, BC V6C 3T4 Prepared by: Hemmera Envirochem Inc. 18th Floor, 4730 Kingsway Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6 File: 302-035.04 June 2015 PMV HEP Hemmera New Brighton Park - i - June 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 RATIONALE ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 PROPOSED HABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROJECT ..................................................................... 5 3.1 SITE HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 PROPOSED WORKS ............................................................................................................... 7 4.0 EXISTING BIOPHYSICAL CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 8 4.1 GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 9 4.2 FIELD ASSESSMENT METHODS ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG)
    SUMMARY REPORTSUMMARY Port Metro Vancouver and Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation Proposed New Brighton Park ShorelineDRAFT Habitat Restoration Project Preliminary Design Public Consultation Summary Report December 2015 Prepared by Kirk & Co. Consulting Ltd. Proposed New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project SUMMARY REPORTSUMMARY Preliminary Design Public Consultation Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Background ......................................................................................1 2. Pre-Engagement (May – June 2015) . 1 3. Conceptual Design Public Consultation (August – September 2015) ......................... 1 4. Preliminary Design Public Consultation (November 2 – 18, 2015) ............................ 2 4.1 Purpose ................................................................................... 2 4.2 Consultation Topics ........................................................................ 3 4.3 Consultation Methods ..................................................................... 3 4.4 Consultation Participation ................................................................. 4 5. Key Results . 5 5.1 Public Information Sessions ................................................................ 5 5.2 New Brighton Park Community Visits ....................................................... 5 5.3 Feedback Forms. 6 5.4 Open Submissions ....................................................................... 18 6. Next Steps . 19 APPENDICES: Appendix 1: Discussion Paper and Feedback Form
    [Show full text]
  • A Plan for the Conservation and Re-Use of the Blue Cabin
    A Plan for the Conservation and Re-use of the Blue Cabin Submitted to the Blue Cabin Committee Harold Kalman with Andrew Todd Conservators Ltd. February 2016 Table of Contents 1. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2. History and significance of the Blue Cabin .......................................................................................... 5 2.1 History and context ............................................................................................................................. 5 The Dollarton and Cates Park Foreshore .............................................................................................. 5 History ................................................................................................................................................... 6 The cabin and its design ........................................................................................................................ 8 Site and assemblages .......................................................................................................................... 12 Relocation ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Profiles of Al Neil and Carole Itter ...................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Heritage significance ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]