Capturing Daily Fluctuations, Flare and Self-Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis: the Patient Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Capturing Daily Fluctuations, Flare and Self-Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis: the Patient Perspective Capturing daily fluctuations, flare and self-management in rheumatoid arthritis: The patient perspective Caroline Anne Flurey MSc A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Health and Life Sciences University of the West of England, Bristol September 2012 Abstract Abstract Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive and systemic auto- immune disease. However, there is very little research on how patients experience daily symptoms and their impact on life, nor how patients self-manage their symptoms on current treatment regimes. Flares of RA lead to major drug treatment decisions, yet there is no standardised definition of flare to support these decisions. Further, there is a dearth of literature addressing the decision-making process surrounding flare help-seeking. A mixed methods, pragmatic approach was taken to address these issues, employed iteratively in three studies: semi-structured interviews, Q-methodology and a longitudinal survey of daily symptoms for three months, alongside self-management and flare help-seeking. The interviews identified that even on current aggressive medication, in daily life patients experience continuing symptoms that vary within and between patients, and can be significant. When discussing their RA, patients used metaphors to enhance their explanations of inexplicable phenomena, such as flare. They fluctuate between living with their RA in the background, moving into the foreground, and at times having to deal with RA in the foreground. Each day patients attempt to balance the physical and emotional impact of RA with independence, a sense of normality and identity, by employing a stepped approach to self-management (“Mediation Ladder”), which leads to a life of Fluctuating Balances. When self- management is difficult, the Fluctuating Balances Model tips and their RA shifts into the foreground. The interview themes informed the two Q-methodology studies, which demonstrated four different experiences of daily life: “Feeling Good”, “Taking Active Control”, “Keeping RA in its Place” and “Struggling Through” (reported predominantly by men) and two ways in which patients differed in their decision- making process for seeking medical help for an RA flare: “Definite Decision” and “Cautious Indecision”. Items ranked as important were used to inform the survey studies, which identified that patients do not necessarily experience their highest symptoms when they are in flare. Thus two different flare-types have been identified: “Inflammatory Flare” (defined by pain and inflammation) and “Avalanche Flare” (defined by the cascading effect of inflammatory symptoms, emotions and life events). Patients are prompted to seek help when the impact of the flare becomes unmanageable. These findings have implications for clinical practice. First, the improved understanding of daily life with RA can be used to talk realistically with new patients about levels of symptoms and the Fluctuating Balances of daily life. Second, there 1 Abstract is a need for agreed terminology between patients and professionals to define flare. Third, clinicians need to be aware that men are “struggling through” with their RA. Fourth, using or responding to metaphors may facilitate communication between patients and professionals. Future research needs to develop a greater understanding of men’s experiences of RA and support needs; to design an outcome measure for the novel concept of “Avalanche Flare”; and a fully-powered study to identify daily symptom patterns and potentially predict future symptom/flare patterns that might inform treatment decisions. 2 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements I would like to thank Arthritis Research UK for funding this PhD fellowship. Also everyone who participated in this research, thank you for your time, enthusiasm and commitment. To my patient research partners Pam Richards and Angela Knight, you have taught me so much more than any research paper, thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience with me. To my wonderful supervisory team: Prof Sarah Hewlett, Dr Marianne Morris, Dr Jon Pollock and Dr Rod Hughes, I have been infinitely lucky to work with you all. Sarah, I cannot express enough gratitude for every opportunity you’ve given me and for your unending support, I couldn’t have asked for a better Director of Studies. Among the many things; thank you for every draft you’ve scrutinised, every presentation you’ve listened to, putting up with my worried ramblings and my excited chattering (flight from Hong Kong springs to mind...!), for everything you’ve taught me, for developing me as a researcher, and for tirelessly being there for me. Maz, thank you so much for your support and encouragement, for the broad perspective you’ve brought to every draft you’ve read and for guiding me on the path to becoming a psychologist. Jon, thank you for your critical eye and your advice and support, particularly with the quantitative aspects of this thesis. Rod, thank you for bringing the clinical perspective to this thesis, for helping to fund my first OMERACT experience and for yours and Alison’s kind hospitality during recruitment. To Julie Taylor, Oonagh Wilson and Janet Brandling, who’ve ridden this PhD rollercoaster with me – what a ride it’s been! Thank you all for the many coffees, doughnuts, sweeties, lunches and brunches over which we’ve shared our literature, our results, our worries, our tears and most importantly our laughter. I would particularly like to thank Julie for guiding me through my first ever conference (BSR 2010, Birmingham) and for all the people you’ve introduced me to in the wider rheumatology community. Peer support really is the best support there is. Thank you all for sharing this journey with me, here’s to many years of research collaboration (and lunches) together! To our BRI aunties: Celia Almeida, Emma Dures and Tessa Sanderson, thank you for your advice, your support, for putting up with many interruptions from me and for all the conference experiences we’ve shared. Tessa and Emma, you have been my role-models, thank you for showing me what is possible. Thank you to everyone who has helped with recruitment: Dr Paul Creamer, Dr Emma Clark, Wendy Wilmott and Maggie Walsh. Thank you to all the clinical and academic staff at the rheumatology unit who have supported me in various ways over the past three years. Particularly to Prof John Kirwan for your support, the opportunities you’ve given me and for always pushing for more out of me. Thank you to the people and institutions that have helped shape, develop and inspire me prior to beginning this PhD: Hayesfield Girls’ School, Bath; University of Wales, Swansea; Staff from the Health Psychology MSc, UWE; Sally Beckett; Maggie Egan; Dawn Saunders; and Jane Birch. Thank you to my lovely friends who have provided support and welcome distractions over the past three years. Particularly to Cara Whiting, who has been constantly supportive and has patiently put up with a distracted bridesmaid. Thank you to everyone who has asked about my progress or wished me well, it has meant so much. To Jon, you have been so patient with me. Thank you for everything you’ve done to make my life easier (particularly in these past few months!), for staying by my side (despite the tears and tantrums!), for always believing in me, telling me that you’re proud of me and for making me feel special. Thank you for waiting for me, I’m back now x x x 3 Dedication To Mum and Dad, I have so much to thank you for. You’ve given me the greatest gift of all: my education. Thank you for every sacrifice you’ve made for me, for every time you’ve picked me up when I’ve stumbled, for always being there for me and always believing in me. For these reasons and many more, I dedicate this thesis to you. 4 Table of contents Table of contents Abstract................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 3 Table of contents ................................................................................. 5 List of figures .................................................................................... 14 List of tables ...................................................................................... 17 List of abbreviations used in this thesis.......................................... 19 Notes to the reader ............................................................................ 21 Chapter 1: Introduction to the thesis .............................................. 22 1.1 Rheumatoid Arthritis ...................................................................................... 22 1.2 Arthitis Research UK ...................................................................................... 23 1.3 Academic rheumatology unit ......................................................................... 23 1.4 The researcher ................................................................................................ 23 1.4.1 Prior knowledge .................................................................................... 23 1.4.2 Epistemological position ....................................................................... 23 1.5 Summary of rationale, aims and research questions .................................. 24 1.5.1 Thesis rationale ...................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • IJSAP Volume 01, Number 06
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 11-1980 IJSAP Volume 01, Number 06 Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/v1_ijsap Recommended Citation "IJSAP Volume 01, Number 06" (1980). IJSAP VOL 1. 6. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/v1_ijsap/6 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~~ ·~·· I International for :fue Study of ~ Animal ProblelllS J Journal f I ·i ;: j .l I ;: rl I <1, I I lr I \ ! \ J r ' ' _...... ,. II.\ . ~ "·-~:~,~ ·. ·,, .,· I ' . -.... ·. - ,, ----- - . -. -- - <.. .... ..• - International for the Study of ITABLE OF CONTENTS-VOL. 1(6) 19801 JoU r n al Animal Problems EDITORIAL OFFICERS EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD EDITORIALS Editors-in-Chief O.K. Belyaev, Institute of Cytology Empathy or Anthropomorphism?- M.W. Fox 346 and Genetics, USSR Michael W. Fox, Director, /SAP J.M. Cass, Veterans Administration, USA Predation- The \~lay of Life- J.R. Rooney 347-348 Andrew N. Rowan, Associate Director, /SAP S. Clark, University of Glasgow, UK J.C. Daniel, Bombay Natural History Society, Editor India C.L. de Cuenca, University of Madrid, Spain NEWS AND REVIEW 349-354 Nancy A. Heneson I. Ekesbo, Swedish Agricultural University, Companion Animals Sweden Production Assistant L.C. Faulkner, University of Missouri, USA Boyhood Cruelty Toward Animals Christine Zimmermann M.F.W. Festing, Medical Research Council Laboratory Animals Laboratory Animals Centre, UK A. F. Fraser, University of Saskatchewan, Scientists Evaluate Alternatives Associate Editors Canada Ethical Principles in Animal Experimentation T.H.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC HEALTH for the 21ST CENTURY Second Edition
    PUBLIC HEALTH FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Second Edition “The second edition of this text is a very welcome addition to the public health Second Edition library. The sweep of its interests and the vision it encapsulates marks it out as Public Health for the 21 Public Health for a true standard bearer for public health into the 21st Century. Its approach is comprehensive and its subject matter compelling.” Mike Kelly, Director of the Centre for Public Health Excellence st The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) the 21 Century This bestselling book has been substantially updated to take into account changing policy and practice. The introduction has been re-written to form a new chapter giving a comprehensive overview of the field of public health, making the book much more accessible to a wider audience. New Perspectives on Policy, Throughout this book, the authors analyse and reflect upon the influence of history, research and procedures upon contemporary public health practice. st Participation and Practice The text explores the debates surrounding the meaning of public health Century and looks at the policy changes that are reshaping its context. Also examined are the contributions that epidemiology and health economics make to public health. Second Edition Public Health for the 21st Century is essential reading for those involved in developing and implementing policies for health improvement, health protection and the reduction of inequalities in health. It also appeals to a wider audience of professionals, lay people and students who are interested in the wider health and well-being of their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Newsletter 2009 Draft 6 16 Pages
    Newsletter Issue 6 Winter 2009/10 Selected highlights in this issue: Introduction by John Ledlie, P.4: Stories of Sporting Success Director of the Peter Harrison Foundation n the summer of 2003, following discussions with Prof. Stuart Biddle and with the active I support of Sir David Wallace, Vice – Chancellor at the time, the Peter Harrison Foundation decided to proceed with long term funding for the creation of a Centre for Disability Sport at Loughborough University. We had in mind the establishment of a top quality research centre, which would build up a core of evidence – based research to take forward the study of Disability Sport – a field to which the Foundation has devoted a significant proportion of our grants over the past 10 years; under our “Opportunity through Sport” programme we have P. 6: Overseas Research made grants totaling almost £9 million over this period. Partners Six years on from the creation of the Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, we are delighted with the way the work is progressing. Under the P. 8-9: Feature Article current Director, Dr. Vicky from Dr Claudio Perret Tolfrey, a great deal has been achieved, both in research projects themselves and in extending awareness of Paralympic sports, both in the UK and abroad. The Foundation was also anxious to increase general P. 7-13: PHC Research understanding of the Updates From left to right: John Ledlie (Director), Dr Vicky Tolfrey, Peter enormous benefits that Harrison (Chairman), Prof Stuart Biddle and Peter Lee (Trustee). involvement in disability sport, P. 5 & 14: Interviews with: of whatever kind, can provide Paul Davies - ‘Head of to participants – and we are pleased with how awareness of these benefits is being extended.
    [Show full text]
  • ALSPAC), C.1980–2000
    History of tHe Avon LongitudinAL study of PArents And CHiLdren (ALsPAC), c.1980–2000 The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group, Queen Mary, University of London, on 24 May 2011 edited by C overy, L A reynolds and e M tansey volume 44 2012 ©the trustee of the Wellcome trust, London, 2012 first published by Queen Mary, university of London, 2012 the History of Modern Biomedicine research group is funded by the Wellcome trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. isBn 9780 90223 878 7 All volumes are freely available online at www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/ wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as: overy C, reynolds L A, tansey e M. (eds) (2012) History of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), c.1980–2000. Wellcome Witnesses to twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 44. London: Queen Mary, university of London. C ontents illustrations and credits v Abbreviations vii Witness seminars: Meetings and publications; Acknowledgements E M Tansey, L A Reynolds and C Overy ix introduction David Gordon xxi transcript Edited by C Overy, L A Reynolds and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Table of Cohort Studies 81 Appendix 2 A summary timeline of the origins and development of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) for the Witness Seminar, 24 May 2011 83 Appendix 3 Funding contributions towards the Children in Focus Study 85 Appendix 4 Table of approximate numbers of grants submitted between 1989 and December 2005 87 Appendix 5 Extract from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, House of Lords, 1990 89 Appendix 6 Letter of instructions for the ALSPAC Air Study 91 Appendix 7 The Teenage Advisory Panel 93 references 95 Biographical notes 103 index 113 iL L ustrAtions And Credits figure 1 Letter sent to ALSPAC parents in 1990–1992 during pregnancy and accompanying their first questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • From Olympics to Paralympics
    THURSDAY,SEPTEMBER 6, 2012 Paralympic Post IN KOOPERATION MIT DER Stronger than ever 301 athletes compete for Britain Faster than ever Peacock challenges Pistorius Paralympic_Post_September_6, 2012_2 Contents 04 Paralympics GB 301 athletes from Britain are competing in all Two games, one set-up 08 20 paralympic sports Most of the Olympic venues dapd are also being used in the photo: Paralympics 09 Time to say hello Bates Steven photo: The opening ceremony was one in a long line of events Blade runners 11 that opened the Games Jonnie Peacock competes Reuters against one of his heroes: photo: Oscar Pistorius 12 News round up John Frauke photo: A stamp for each winning athlete, The oldest, the Girl power 13 youngest and more news Poultney Great Britain’s wheelchair David basketball-team photo: go for gold 15 Ade Adepitan’s Paralympics AFP photo: He played wheelchair basketball for the UK – now he is a TV presenter Hill Kelly photo: Cover picture Publisher: Photographer: Thilo Rückeis Pereira Dos Santos, Dominik Prüfer,Benjamin Sarah Storey won Great Britain's first gold medal Stephan-Andreas Casdorff, Advertisement: Ten Alps Media Scholz, Wibke Schumacher,George Simonds, of the Games at the London Velodrome. Lorenz Maroldt. Production: Detlev Jackschenties, Nora Tschepe-Wiesinger,Keri Trigg,Enya Wolf. On Thursday she was roared on by a crowd Editors: Fritz Schanninger. of 6,000 as she stormed to victory in the Nicolas Diekmann, Clara Kaminsky, Reporters: Maxie Borchert, Carina Canavan, The Paralympic Post is a joint project of Tages- 3km C5 individual pursuit. The 34 year old cyclist, Carsten Kloth, Annette Kögel, Jan Mohnhaupt Alice Conroy, Nicolas Feißt, Karla Imdahl, spiegel, Berlin, Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfall- who was born without a left hand, triumphed Karin Preugschat, Katrin Schulze, Emily Jamison, Jacob Joy, Tavishi Kanwar, versicherung and panta rhei, Beratungsgesell- on a spectacular first day for Paralympics GB Claus Vetter,Thomas Wurster (V.i.S.d.P.) Alexander Kauschanski, Alisha Mathis, schaft für gesellschaftliche Prozesse mbH.
    [Show full text]
  • Run for the Future Funds Prostate Cancer Research At
    thebulletin27 September 2008 - Issue 79 Run for the Future funds prostate cancer research at UWE In this month’s issue 2 Run for the Future NEWS funds prostate cancer research Run for the Future funds prostate cancer 3 Olympic gold medallist Pete Reed learnt to research at UWE row at UWE 4 Study reveals radio UWE scientists, working in partnership with the Bristol Urological Institute (BUI) at North Bristol presenters encourage NHS Trust and the Bristol Royal Infirmary, are about to embark on important research that will help drinking culture to fight prostate cancer thanks to funds raised at the annual Run for the Future event. 4 Working with UNICEF Run for the Future raises funds for research into prostate cancer and highlights awareness. The Bangladesh to prevent 5km walk, jog or run, organised by the Rotary in Bristol, took place on the Downs on 7 September. 680 people took part raising between £30,000 and £40,000. All of the research team took part in childhood injuries the run and Anthony Rhodes’s daughter was the winning female runner Added to the £100,000 5 Nursery rated good by raised in previous years, the money will be used to fund two PhD students on the joint BUI/UWE Ofsted biomedical research team. Dr Anthony Rhodes, Dr Michael Ladomery, Dr Myra Conway and Professor Norman Ratcliffe from 6 Heart Robot wows the the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences and Chris Probert from Bristol Royal Infirmary will supervise world’s media two PhD students who will work on an evaluation of an alternative ‘urine based’ method of 8 Growing mural prostate cancer diagnosis and a separate project to develop tests that identify aggressive forms of blooming at Bristol prostate cancer.
    [Show full text]