DOCSLIB.ORG

Gray-Wolf-Opening-Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gray-Wolf-Opening-Brief 1 DAMIEN M. SCHIFF, No. 235101 E-mail: [email protected] 2 ANTHONY L. FRANÇOIS, No. 184100 E-mail: [email protected] 3 Pacific Legal Foundation 930 G Street 4 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 419-7111 5 Facsimile: (916) 419-7747 6 Attorneys for Petitioners and Plaintiffs 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 10 11 CALIFORNIA CATTLEMEN’S ASSOCIATION No. 37-2017-00003866-CU-MC-CTL and CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU 12 FEDERATION, MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS AND PLAINTIFFS’ 13 Petitioners and Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PEREMPTORY WRITS, 14 v. AND FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 15 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME (CCP §§ 437c, 1060, 1085, 1094, COMMISSION, & 1094.5; Gov’t Code § 11350) 16 Respondent and Defendant, IMAGED FILED 17 and Date: January 18, 2019 18 Time: 1:30 p.m. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; Department C-67 19 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Honorable Eddie C. Sturgeon INFORMATION CENTER; KLAMATH- 20 SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER; and Action Filed January 31, 2017 CASCADIA WILDLANDS, 21 Respondent-Intervenors. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for J. on Peremptory Writs & Summ. Adj. No. 37-2017-00003866-CU-MC-CTL 1 Table of Contents 2 Page 3 Table of Authorities ..........................................................................................................................3 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................6 5 Statement of Law and Facts ..............................................................................................................7 6 Standard of Review .........................................................................................................................11 7 Argument ........................................................................................................................................12 8 I. The Gray Wolf’s Listing Is Illegal Because It Is Based on the 9 Presence of a Non-Native Subspecies of Wolf ...................................................................12 10 II. The Gray Wolf’s Listing Is Illegal Because It Is Based on the Commission’s Incorrect Interpretation of the Statutory Term “Range” .............................14 11 III. The Gray Wolf’s Listing Is Illegal Because It Is Based on the 12 Intermittent Presence of a Single Animal ...........................................................................18 13 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................20 14 Declaration of Service .....................................................................................................................21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for J. on Peremptory Writs & Summ. J. No. 37-2017-00003866-CU-MC-CTL 2 1 Table of Authorities 2 Page 3 Cases 4 Ariz. Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. Salazar, 606 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2010) ..................................... 18 5 Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Bonta, 106 Cal. App. 4th 498 (2003) .................. 15 6 California Forestry Association v. California Fish & Game Commission, 7 156 Cal. App. 4th 1535 (2007).............................................................................................. 16 8 Cent. Coast Forest Ass’n v. Fish & Game Comm’n, 18 Cal. App. 5th 1191 (2018)............................................................................... 12-14, 17, 19 9 County of L.A. v. Fin. Casualty & Surety, Inc., 10 216 Cal. App. 4th 1192 (2013).............................................................................................. 14 11 Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Dep’t of Fish & Wildlife, 12 234 Cal. App. 4th 214 (2015)................................................................................................ 16 13 Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton, 258 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2001) ................................................ 17 14 Hammond v. Agran, 76 Cal. App. 4th 1181 (1999) .................................................................... 15 15 In re Marriage of Davis, 61 Cal. 4th 846 (2015) ........................................................................ 17 16 Kinsman v. Unocal Corp., 37 Cal. 4th 659 (2005) ..................................................................... 16 17 Laurel Heights Improvement Ass’n v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 18 47 Cal. 3d 376 (1988) ............................................................................................................. 7 19 McGill v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 44 Cal. App. 4th 1776 (1996) ........................... 11, 14, 18, 20 20 People v. Alvarado, 87 Cal. App. 4th 178 (2001) ................................................................. 13, 16 21 People v. Knoller, 41 Cal. 4th 139 (2007) .................................................................................. 16 22 Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. FAA, 971 F.2d 544 (10th Cir. 1992) .................................. 7 23 San Bernardino Valley Audubon Soc’y v. City of Moreno Valley, 24 44 Cal. App. 4th 593 (1996)............................................................................................ 14, 17 25 Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 14 Cal. 4th 557 (1996) ...................................... 15 26 Watts v. Oak Shores Cmty. Ass’n, 235 Cal. App. 4th 466 (2015) ............................................... 16 27 World Business Acad. v. Cal. State Lands Comm’n, 234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 277 (2018) .................................................................................................. 7 28 Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for J. on Peremptory Writs & Summ. Adj. No. 37-2017-00003866 -CU-MC-CTL 3 1 Yamaha Corp. of Am. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 19 Cal. 4th 1 (1998) .............................. 11-12 2 Statutes 3 16 U.S.C. § 1532(6) .................................................................................................................... 14 4 16 U.S.C. § 1532(20) .................................................................................................................. 14 5 Cal. Stats. 1970, ch. 1510, § 3, at 2998 ................................................................................. 14, 17 6 Code Civ. Proc. § 1085 ............................................................................................. 11, 14, 18, 20 7 Code Civ. Proc. § 1094.5(b) ..................................................................................... 11, 14, 18, 20 8 Fish & Game Code §§ 2050-2115.5 ............................................................................................. 6 9 Fish & Game Code § 2051(a)-(b) ............................................................................................... 16 10 Fish & Game Code § 2052 .......................................................................................................... 14 11 Fish & Game Code § 2062 ...................................................................................... 6, 8, 12, 14, 17 12 Fish & Game Code § 2067 ................................................................................................ 6, 12, 17 13 14 Fish & Game Code § 2071 ............................................................................................................ 8 15 Fish & Game Code § 2073.5 ......................................................................................................... 8 16 Fish & Game Code § 2074.2(e) .................................................................................................... 9 17 Fish & Game Code § 2074.6 ......................................................................................................... 9 18 Fish & Game Code § 2075.5(e) .................................................................................................... 9 19 Fish & Game Code § 2076 .......................................................................................................... 11 20 Fish & Game Code § 2080 ...................................................................................................... 6, 12 21 Fish & Game Code § 2081 ............................................................................................................ 6 22 Fish & Game Code § 4150 ............................................................................................................ 6 23 Fish & Game Code § 4152 ............................................................................................................ 6 24 Gov’t Code §§ 11340-11361 ......................................................................................................... 9 25 Gov’t Code § 11340.5(a)............................................................................................................. 15 26 Gov’t Code § 11340.9(a)-(i) ....................................................................................................... 16 27 Gov't Code § 11340.9(f) .............................................................................................................. 16 28 Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for J. on Peremptory Writs & Summ. Adj. No. 37-2017-00003866 -CU-MC-CTL 4 1 Gov’t Code § 11342.600 ............................................................................................................. 15 2 Gov’t Code § 11349.1(a)............................................................................................................... 9 3 Gov’t Code § 11350(a)...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Wolf Attacks - Wikipedia
    List of wolf attacks - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wolf_attacks List of wolf attacks This is a list of significant wolf attacks worldwide, by century, in reverse chronological order. Contents 2010s 2000s 1900s 1800s 1700s See also References Bibliography 2010s 1 von 28 14.03.2018, 14:46 List of wolf attacks - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wolf_attacks Type of Victim(s) Age Gender Date Location Details Source(s) attack A wolf attacked the woman in the yard when she was busy with the household. First it bit her right arm and then tried to snap her throat .A Omyt Village, Zarechni bucket which she used to protect Lydia Vladimirovna 70 ♀ January 19, 2018 Rabid District, Rivne Region, her throat saved her life as the [1][2] Ukraine rabid animal furiously ripped the bucket. A Neighbor shot the wolf which was tested rabid. The attacked lady got the necessary medical treatments. 2-3 wolves strayed through a small village. Within 10 hours starting at 9 p.m.one of them attacked and hurt 4 people. Lina Zaporozhets Anna Lushchik, Vladimir was saved by her laptop. When the A Village, Koropsky Kiryanov , Lyubov wolf bit into it, she could escape 63, 59, 53, 14 ♀/♂/♂/♀ January 4, 2018 Unprovoked District, Chernihiv [3][4] Gerashchenko, Lina through the door of her yard.The Region Ukraine. Zaporozhets injured were treated in the Koropsky Central District Hospital. One of the wolves was shot in the middle of the village and sent to rabies examination. At intervals of 40 minutes a wolf attacked two men.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDICTIVE ECOLOGICAL MODELING of GREY WOLF (Canis Lupus)
    PREDICTIVE ECOLOGICAL MODELING OF GREY WOLF (Canis lupus) MOVEMENT USING AGENT-BASED MODELING AND GIS by ALYSSA C. TEWS B.S., Rhodes College, 2016 A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Colorado Colorado Springs in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography and Environmental Studies 2020 0 © 2020 ALYSSA C. TEWS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED i This thesis for the Master of Arts degree by Alyssa C. Tews has been approved for the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies by Steve Jennings, Chair David Havlick Diep Dao Date: December 15, 2020 ii Tews, Alyssa C. (M.A., Applied Geography) Predictive ecological modeling of grey wolf (Canis lupus) movement using agent-based modeling and GIS Thesis directed by Associate Professor Steve Jennings, Emeritus ABSTRACT There is a wide-spread loss of large predators being witnessed across ecosystems globally. The large, apex predators are either displaced from habitat destruction, or killed directly by anthropogenic disturbances. We need apex predators for tri-trophic cascades, mesopredator control, and to promote biodiversity in ecosystems. Previous ecology research highlights how a tri-trophic cascade, or a series of dynamic interactions between predator, prey, and vegetation, is vital for allowing the ecosystem to be resilient and sustainable to disturbances. Technology equips us with new methods of exploring ecosystem functions, animal behavior, and how changing landscapes affect animal movement. By constructing an ABM for grey wolves in North America, we experimented with different predator efficiencies to test how grey wolves could possibly recolonize Moffat County, Colorado. Results from the ABM showed patterns of wolf occupation along low-elevation, river valleys, the wolves did not impact or disrupt prey population demographics, and wolves were able to recolonize the region despite the different predator efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpse of an African… Wolf? Cécile Bloch
    $6.95 Glimpse of an African… Wolf ? PAGE 4 Saving the Red Wolf Through Partnerships PAGE 9 Are Gray Wolves Still Endangered? PAGE 14 Make Your Home Howl Members Save 10% Order today at shop.wolf.org or call 1-800-ELY-WOLF Your purchases help support the mission of the International Wolf Center. VOLUME 25, NO. 1 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER SPRING 2015 4 Cécile Bloch 9 Jeremy Hooper 14 Don Gossett In the Long Shadow of The Red Wolf Species Survival Are Gray Wolves Still the Pyramids and Beyond: Plan: Saving the Red Wolf Endangered? Glimpse of an African…Wolf? Through Partnerships In December a federal judge ruled Geneticists have found that some In 1967 the number of red wolves that protections be reinstated for of Africa’s golden jackals are was rapidly declining, forcing those gray wolves in the Great Lakes members of the gray wolf lineage. remaining to breed with the more wolf population area, reversing Biologists are now asking: how abundant coyote or not to breed at all. the USFWS’s 2011 delisting many golden jackals across Africa The rate of hybridization between the decision that allowed states to are a subspecies known as the two species left little time to prevent manage wolves and implement African wolf? Are Africa’s golden red wolf genes from being completely harvest programs for recreational jackals, in fact, wolves? absorbed into the expanding coyote purposes. If biological security is population. The Red Wolf Recovery by Cheryl Lyn Dybas apparently not enough rationale for Program, working with many other conservation of the species, then the organizations, has created awareness challenge arises to properly express and laid a foundation for the future to the ecological value of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Delisting Wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains: Congress Cries
    Copyright © 2011 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120. he f .return.o .the.children.of.the.night.to.the.North- Delisting Wolves ern . Rocky. Mountains. (NRM). has. been. one. of. the .most.contentious.campaigns.in.the.wolf.war .. TEnvironmental. groups. support. the. return. of. the. wolf,. a. in the Northern summit .predator,.to.restore.ecological.balance,.maintain. biodiversity,. and. preserve. the. genetic. heritage .. The. live- stock .industry.views.the.return.of.its.nemesis.as.a.threat. Rocky Mountains: to .its.economic.vitality ..Hunters.oppose.the.return.of.the. wolf, .which.is.a.competitor.for.the.killing.of.large.game .. Congress Cries Western .states.are.hostile.to.the.return.of.the.wolf,.which.is. seensn .a .a .infringement.of.traditional.state.authority.over. wildlife .and.another.example.of.federal.public.land.policy. Wolf that.threatens.vital.state.economic.and.cultural.interests . This .Article.will.provide.a.brief.history.of.the.campaign,. which . demonstrates. the. important. role. of. the. courts. in. wolf .recovery ..It.will.analyze.the.Montana.federal.district. court . decision. in. 2010. restoring. endangered. and. threat- ened .species.status.to.wolf.in.the.NRM ..It.will.point.out. that .the.court’s.decision,.which.held.that.the.NRM.Dis- tinct .Population.Segment.(DPS)1. ecan.not.b .subdivided. by.Edward.A ..Fitzgerald on .a.state-by-state.basis,.was.correct ..Several.post-litigation. Edward.A ..Fitzgerald.is.a.Professor.of.Political. events . that. raise. questions. about. the. decision. are. exam- Science .at.Wright.State.University . ined .. Wyoming. federal.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolves Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services May 2021 Gray Wolves Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series Eric M. Gese Research Wildlife Biologist USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Logan, Utah John P. Hart District Supervisor USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services Grand Rapids, Minnesota Patricia A. Terletzky Geospatial Analyst Department of Wildland Resources Utah State University Logan, Utah Figure 1. Gray wolf (Canis lupus). Quick Links Human-Wildlife Conflicts 1 Human-Wildlife Conflicts Damage Identification 4 The gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a wide- States. Gray wolves were listed as an Management Methods 6 ranging carnivore with a global endangered species in 1974. Subsequent distribution throughout the northern recovery efforts have resulted in wolf Economics 16 hemisphere. Wolves are the largest populations in the western Great Lakes Species Overview 19 member of the family Canidae (Figure 1). Region, the northern Rocky Mountains, the southwest (Mexican wolf), and the Pacific Legal Status 22 It is often considered a symbol of the wilderness. Northwest. Glossary & Keywords 23 Resources 24 Historically, wolves were found throughout Wolf conflicts are primarily related to North America. By the 1940s, however, predation on livestock, pets and other Appendix 29 wolves were eradicated from most of their domestic animals, as well as their direct former range in the continental United and indirect impacts on native Page 2 WDM Technical Series─Gray Wolves ungulates (i.e., big game). Economic losses vary parasites, including the hydatid worm, Echinococcus widely with some livestock producers facing high granulosus. It can be transmitted to people and grows into levels of depredation in some areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Scriptie
    Dissertation 2011-2012 Vanessa Almeida da Silva Amorim Wolf V Dog – Predator V Pet 4 BDAO Titel Predator V Pet – the difference between wolves and dogs Abstract Dogs play a prominent role in modern day society. Most of them are kept for companionship which translates into a very close dog-human relationship. Canis familiaris have adapted incredibly well to man-made society however with an increasing number of cases ending up in shelters it is fair to say that this subject still needs further exploration. A lot has been written about the way dogs behave and how owners can improve their relationship with their pet. A very popular vision on dog behaviour is the wolf pack theory also called lupomorphism. For a long time the interpretation of this vision consisted in the need for a dog owner to be a leader by any means. If an owner is not strong enough as a leader a dog will try to take over this role and show behaviour that is not desirable. Recent studies have shown that there are gaps in this theory. The vision on how a wolf pack functions has changed and there is an increasing number of experts that agree that the best study subject for dog behaviour is in fact the dog itself. The goal of this thesis is to clarify how dogs and wolves relate to each other as species both biologically and psychologically. A lot of literature research has gone into this thesis to try and find out what really goes on inside a dog’s head and if comparing them to wolves is useful to grasp that idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Status Assessment for the Alexander Archipelago Wolf (Canis Lupus Ligoni)
    FINAL SUMMARY REPORT Peer Review of Draft Status Assessment for the Alexander Archipelago Wolf (Canis lupus ligoni) REGION 7 OFFICE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE September 10, 2015 Prepared for: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1011 E Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Prepared by: 2 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & 0 2 Infrastructure, Inc. 0 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A K S Santa Barbara, CA 93101 t r e USFWS Order No. F13PB00307 e t Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. 32106C011 N W W a s h i n g t TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Background .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Summary of Peer Reviewer Responses ............................................................... 2 Question 1 .............................................................................................. 3 Question 2 .............................................................................................. 3 Question 3 .............................................................................................. 4 Other Comments ..................................................................................... 5 4.0 Overall Summary for Each Reviewer .................................................................... 6 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver County, Utah Resource Management Plan
    BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Beaver County Commissioners Michael F. Dalton, Chair Mark S. Whitney Tammy Pearson Planning & Zoning Commission Darrel Davis, Chairman Kyle Blackner, Administrator Von Christiansen, Attorney Jamie Kelsey, Secretary Steve Kinross Mike Riley Walter Schofield Kolby Blackner Drew Coombs Don Noyes Public Lands Keven Whicker, Public Lands Administrator County Staff Scott Albrecht, Michelle Evans, Tracy McMullin, Heidi Eyre Adopted June X, 2017 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... v LEGAL BASIS FOR COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANNING .......................... ix SOCIAL-ECONOMIC LINKAGES ............................................................................................. xi CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SETTING .............................................................. xv DESIRED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SETTING .............................................................. xvii 1. LAND USE ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. ENERGY, MINING, MINERAL & GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................... 9 2.1 Mining and Mineral & Geological Resources .................................................................. 9 2.2 Energy Resources ............................................................................................................ 20 3. AGRICULTURE .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • To Howl Or Not to Howl? the Nature of Synchrony in Wolf Chorus Howling
    To Howl or not to Howl? The Nature of Synchrony in Wolf Chorus Howling Rebecca Barrett Abstract As apex predators, grey wolves (Canis lupus) are in direct conflict with humans and have been historically persecuted due to livestock depredation. Their numbers fell dramatically in the 20th century but following reintroduction and the establishment of a protected status, wolves are recolonizing many areas of their historical range. Effective wild management schemes are necessary to minimise further human-wolf conflict. To develop effective management schemes, a more complete understanding of wolf vocal behaviour is needed. The recording of wolf howls could provide a non-invasive method to monitor population sizes and territories in the wild. Wolf howls are used for long range communication and play a role in territory maintenance and pack assembly. Chorus howls are thought to have similar functions. In this study we recorded howls of captive wolves to investigate the structure of choruses and elucidate whether this is related to individual wolf characteristics such as howl frequency, age, sex or dominance rank. We found that while some individuals led more chorus howls than others, the initiation success of each wolf was equal. Chorus leadership does not appear to be dominated by specific individuals or determined by specific howl characteristics. Instead, the leading of choruses appears to be a by-product of increased howling rate and duration. These results improve our understanding of wolf chorus howls and could prove useful in the development of monitoring schemes and long-range pack identification in the wild. 1 Introduction Acoustic signals play an important role in animal communication by allowing messages to be conveyed rapidly over long distances without the need for physical or visual contact (Hopp et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Perils of Recovering the Mexican Wolf Outside of Its Historical Range T ⁎ Eric A
    Biological Conservation 220 (2018) 290–298 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Perspective Perils of recovering the Mexican wolf outside of its historical range T ⁎ Eric A. Odella, , James R. Heffelfingerb, Steven S. Rosenstockb, Chad J. Bishopc, Stewart Lileyd, Alejandro González-Bernale, Julián A. Velascof,g, Enrique Martínez-Meyere,h a Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 317 W. Prospect Road, Fort Collins, 80526, CO, USA b Arizona Game and Fish Department, 5000 W. Carefree Highway, Phoenix, AZ 85086, USA c University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA d New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, One Wildlife Way, Santa Fe, NM 87507, USA e Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Del. Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico f Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Centro Universitario de la Costa, Universidad de Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco 48280, Mexico g Museo de Zoología ‘Alfonso L. Herrera’, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Del. Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico h Centro del Cambio Global y la Sustentabilidad en el Sureste. AC, Villahermosa, Tabasco 86080, Mexico ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Mexican wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) was included in the 1973 Endangered Species Act listing of the gray wolf Canis lupus baileyi (C. lupus), but then listed separately as a subspecies in 2015. Early accounts of its range included the Sierra Genetic integrity Madre Occidental of Mexico, southeastern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico, and sometimes western Texas, Genetic swamping supported by ecological, biogeographic, and morphological data. There have been multiple unsuccessful at- Historical range tempts to revise the original 1982 recovery plan and identify areas suitable for Mexican wolf reintroduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolves, by the Numbers Larry Desjardin
    Wolves, by the Numbers Larry Desjardin In November 2020, Colorado citizens will vote on Proposition 114, the Gray Wolf Reintroduction Initiative. It would mandate Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) to develop a plan to reintroduce gray wolves onto lands west of the Continental Divide by 2023. There has been much debate on what impact wolves would have on Colorado ungulate herds, ranching, and hunting. Much of the debate has been qualitative in nature- citing advantages and disadvantages of wolves on the landscape. This paper describes a wolf/prey simulator that quantitatively models the impacts of wolves on Colorado ungulates (specifically elk, deer, and moose) and the associated changes in hunting to maintain stable herd sizes. The results are compared to documented observations and studies of wolves reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park. This paper also looks at livestock depredation impacts, modeled by the historical record in Montana. The conclusion of the analysis is that the impact from wolves is highly correlated to their total population. Wolf/Prey Simulator A wolf/prey simulator was developed combining a yield analysis of each ungulate species together with a biomass consumption model for wolves. The simulator has two distinct pieces to it: The simulation engine itself, and the biological and herd parameters that it simulates. For any one scenario (the set of biological parameters) the number of wolves may be varied to model the impact. The simulator comes with default parameters that describe the standard model. Any of these parameters may be modified by a user. To test the credibility of the simulator, the results of the standard model are compared to observed elk consumption by wolves from numerous studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolves (Canis Lupus)
    The effect of aromatherapy scents on 5 key behaviours of captive pairs of grey wolves (Canis lupus). Name: Megan Webb Student number: 10261727 Degree: BSc (hons) Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Year: 4 Faculty of science and environment, university of Plymouth Project advisor: Sarah Collins. Contents 1. Abstract 1 2. Introduction 3. Method ▪ 3:1 – Test subjects ▪ 3:2 – study site ▪ 3:3 – materials ▪ 3:4 – olfactory conditions ▪ 3:5 – administration of scent ▪ 3:6 – data collection ▪ 3:7 – behavioural observations ▪ 3:8 – statistical analysis ▪ 3:9 – ethical considerations 4. Results ▪ 4:1 – play behaviour ▪ 4:2 – rest behaviour ▪ 4:3 – sleep behaviour ▪ 4:4 – vocal behaviour ▪ 4:5 – patrol behaviour 5. Discussion 6. Conclusion 7. Acknowledgements 8. References 9. Appendices ▪ 9:1 – off site risk assessment ▪ 9:2 – peppermint essential oil safety data sheet ▪ 9:3 – rosemary essential oil safety data sheet ▪ 9:4 – tangerine essential oil safety data sheet 1: Abstract: 2 Olfactory enrichment is the administration of scent or a scented material into the environment. The use of olfactory enrichment can improve captive welfare of mammals and has a variety of applications in captive animal management. This study explores the effects of 3 aromatherapy scents (tangerine, peppermint and rosemary) as olfactory enrichment on 5 key behaviours of 4 captive grey wolves housed at the UK Wolf Conservation Trust. The wolves were exposed to each of the scents repeatedly over a period of weeks. Behavioural observations were made every day and scents administered twice a week. The scent was administered via a dilute solution poured over a straw bail.
    [Show full text]