DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Sources, Beliefs and Values of Key Stakeholder Groups in Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Sources, Beliefs and Values of Key Stakeholder Groups in Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction INFORMATION SOURCES, BELIEFS AND VALUES OF KEY STAKEHOLDER GROUPS IN MEXICAN GRAY WOLF REINTRODUCTION By THERESA DELENE BEELAND A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Theresa DeLene Beeland 2 To my family, and dear ones, who have lovingly supported my passionate pursuit of knowledge. “Only passions, great passions, can elevate the soul to great things.”—Denis Diderot 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are numerous people to thank for assisting with or encouraging this project. First, I thank the participants themselves, and the people who helped me get in touch with them, for taking time from their busy days to sit down and talk to me for several hours at their kitchen tables, in cafés and in their offices across the southwest. I hope this project reflects the great value of their time and ability to share their beliefs and experiences with me. Second, I thank those that sponsored the project: Scot Smotherman, a private hunter, conservationist and good friend; and the Mexican Wolf Conservation Fund. Third, special thanks go to the School of Natural Resources and Environment for admitting me to their Interdisciplinary Ecology program; and to Professor Kim Walsh-Childers of the Journalism Department for agreeing to advise me in the emerging path joining journalism with studies in natural resources and ecology. Last but not least, sincere and long-overdue thanks go to my family and loved ones for their endless support and encouragement. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..........................................................................................................9 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................10 CHAPTERS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................11 Study Purpose .........................................................................................................................11 Study Justification ..................................................................................................................11 Contextual Background: Mexican Gray Wolf History...........................................................13 Species Description and Historic Range .........................................................................13 Extermination of Gray Wolves in the Wild.....................................................................14 Captive Breeding Program ..............................................................................................15 Listing Status...................................................................................................................16 Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area....................................................................................18 Wild Wolf Removals and Livestock Death Rates...........................................................20 Organizational Structure..................................................................................................21 Stakeholder Conflicts ......................................................................................................22 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .........................................................................................................24 Information Sources, Beliefs and Values ...............................................................................24 Public Opinion and Public Policy....................................................................................25 Public Opinion Polls on the Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction Program....................25 Studies of Human Attitudes toward Predators........................................................................27 Compensation Studies for Wolf Depredation..................................................................30 Anti-Carnivore Beliefs in Rural Communities................................................................31 Ecological Significance of Wolves.........................................................................................32 Wolf-Prey Relationships .................................................................................................32 Non-Prey Relationships...................................................................................................33 Ecosystem Effects of Wolves..........................................................................................34 Research Questions.................................................................................................................38 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................39 Qualitative Research...............................................................................................................39 Research Design and In-Depth Interviews .............................................................................40 5 Objectivity, reliability and validity..................................................................................41 Interview guide development ..........................................................................................43 Pre-tests and refinement ..................................................................................................44 Data Gathering.................................................................................................................45 Data Analysis...................................................................................................................47 4 FINDINGS................................................................................................................................49 Emergent Themes and Categories ..........................................................................................49 Stakeholder Group One: Livestock Producers ................................................................50 Diagrammatic Summary..................................................................................................68 Stakeholder Group Two: Wolf Conservationists ............................................................69 Diagrammatic Summary..................................................................................................85 Stakeholder Group Three: Government Employees........................................................86 Diagrammatic Summary..................................................................................................98 Summary.................................................................................................................................99 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION.....................................................................................105 Examination and Comparison of Stakeholder Beliefs..........................................................105 Study Limitations..................................................................................................................112 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................114 APPENDICES A MAPS.....................................................................................................................................120 B INTERVIEW GUIDES..........................................................................................................125 Livestock Producers..............................................................................................................125 Wolf Conservationists ..........................................................................................................127 Government Employees........................................................................................................129 C INFORMED CONSENT FORM ..........................................................................................131 D CAPTIVE BREEDING FACILITIES ..................................................................................133 E EXCERPTS ...........................................................................................................................135 LIST OF REFERENCES.............................................................................................................137 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................................144 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 3-1: Total audio times and transcribed pages per stakeholder group.............................................47 4-1: General findings ...................................................................................................................102 4-2: Significant beliefs about Mexican wolves and wolf program..............................................103 4-3: Significant views on wolf policies .......................................................................................104
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Wolf Attacks - Wikipedia
    List of wolf attacks - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wolf_attacks List of wolf attacks This is a list of significant wolf attacks worldwide, by century, in reverse chronological order. Contents 2010s 2000s 1900s 1800s 1700s See also References Bibliography 2010s 1 von 28 14.03.2018, 14:46 List of wolf attacks - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wolf_attacks Type of Victim(s) Age Gender Date Location Details Source(s) attack A wolf attacked the woman in the yard when she was busy with the household. First it bit her right arm and then tried to snap her throat .A Omyt Village, Zarechni bucket which she used to protect Lydia Vladimirovna 70 ♀ January 19, 2018 Rabid District, Rivne Region, her throat saved her life as the [1][2] Ukraine rabid animal furiously ripped the bucket. A Neighbor shot the wolf which was tested rabid. The attacked lady got the necessary medical treatments. 2-3 wolves strayed through a small village. Within 10 hours starting at 9 p.m.one of them attacked and hurt 4 people. Lina Zaporozhets Anna Lushchik, Vladimir was saved by her laptop. When the A Village, Koropsky Kiryanov , Lyubov wolf bit into it, she could escape 63, 59, 53, 14 ♀/♂/♂/♀ January 4, 2018 Unprovoked District, Chernihiv [3][4] Gerashchenko, Lina through the door of her yard.The Region Ukraine. Zaporozhets injured were treated in the Koropsky Central District Hospital. One of the wolves was shot in the middle of the village and sent to rabies examination. At intervals of 40 minutes a wolf attacked two men.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDICTIVE ECOLOGICAL MODELING of GREY WOLF (Canis Lupus)
    PREDICTIVE ECOLOGICAL MODELING OF GREY WOLF (Canis lupus) MOVEMENT USING AGENT-BASED MODELING AND GIS by ALYSSA C. TEWS B.S., Rhodes College, 2016 A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Colorado Colorado Springs in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography and Environmental Studies 2020 0 © 2020 ALYSSA C. TEWS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED i This thesis for the Master of Arts degree by Alyssa C. Tews has been approved for the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies by Steve Jennings, Chair David Havlick Diep Dao Date: December 15, 2020 ii Tews, Alyssa C. (M.A., Applied Geography) Predictive ecological modeling of grey wolf (Canis lupus) movement using agent-based modeling and GIS Thesis directed by Associate Professor Steve Jennings, Emeritus ABSTRACT There is a wide-spread loss of large predators being witnessed across ecosystems globally. The large, apex predators are either displaced from habitat destruction, or killed directly by anthropogenic disturbances. We need apex predators for tri-trophic cascades, mesopredator control, and to promote biodiversity in ecosystems. Previous ecology research highlights how a tri-trophic cascade, or a series of dynamic interactions between predator, prey, and vegetation, is vital for allowing the ecosystem to be resilient and sustainable to disturbances. Technology equips us with new methods of exploring ecosystem functions, animal behavior, and how changing landscapes affect animal movement. By constructing an ABM for grey wolves in North America, we experimented with different predator efficiencies to test how grey wolves could possibly recolonize Moffat County, Colorado. Results from the ABM showed patterns of wolf occupation along low-elevation, river valleys, the wolves did not impact or disrupt prey population demographics, and wolves were able to recolonize the region despite the different predator efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpse of an African… Wolf? Cécile Bloch
    $6.95 Glimpse of an African… Wolf ? PAGE 4 Saving the Red Wolf Through Partnerships PAGE 9 Are Gray Wolves Still Endangered? PAGE 14 Make Your Home Howl Members Save 10% Order today at shop.wolf.org or call 1-800-ELY-WOLF Your purchases help support the mission of the International Wolf Center. VOLUME 25, NO. 1 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER SPRING 2015 4 Cécile Bloch 9 Jeremy Hooper 14 Don Gossett In the Long Shadow of The Red Wolf Species Survival Are Gray Wolves Still the Pyramids and Beyond: Plan: Saving the Red Wolf Endangered? Glimpse of an African…Wolf? Through Partnerships In December a federal judge ruled Geneticists have found that some In 1967 the number of red wolves that protections be reinstated for of Africa’s golden jackals are was rapidly declining, forcing those gray wolves in the Great Lakes members of the gray wolf lineage. remaining to breed with the more wolf population area, reversing Biologists are now asking: how abundant coyote or not to breed at all. the USFWS’s 2011 delisting many golden jackals across Africa The rate of hybridization between the decision that allowed states to are a subspecies known as the two species left little time to prevent manage wolves and implement African wolf? Are Africa’s golden red wolf genes from being completely harvest programs for recreational jackals, in fact, wolves? absorbed into the expanding coyote purposes. If biological security is population. The Red Wolf Recovery by Cheryl Lyn Dybas apparently not enough rationale for Program, working with many other conservation of the species, then the organizations, has created awareness challenge arises to properly express and laid a foundation for the future to the ecological value of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivore CAMP 1993.Pdf
    SMALL CARNIVORE CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Review Draft Report 1G May 1994 Edited and compiled by Roland Wirth, Angela Glatston, Onnie Byers, Susie Ellis, Pat Foster-Turley, Paul Robinson, Harry Van Rompaey, Don Moore, Ajith Kumar, Roland Melisch, and Ulysses Seal Prepared by the participants of a workshop held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands 11-14 February 1993 A Collaborative Workshop IUCN/SSC MUSTELID, VIVERRID, AND PROCYONID SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC OTTER SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC CAPTIVE BREEDING SPECIALIST GROUP Sponsored by The Rotterdam Zoo IUCN/SSC Sir Peter Scott Fund United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid, and Procyonid Specialist Group and the IUCN/SSC Otter Specialist Group. The Primary Sponsors of the Workshop were: The Rotterdam Zoo, IUCN/SSC Peter Scott Fund, United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group. Cover Photo: Malayan Civet, Viverra tangalunga by Roland Wirth. Wirth, R., A Glatston, 0. Byers, S. Ellis, P. Foster-Turley, P. Robinson, H. Van Rompaey, D. Moore, A Kumar, R. Melisch, U.Seal. (eds.). 1994. Small Carnivore Conservation Assessment and Management Plan. IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of this publication can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. Send checks for US $35.00 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US Bank. Funds may be wired to First Bank NA ABA No. 091000022, for credit to CBSG Account No.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Endangered Gorillas and Chimpanzees in International Trade: Can CITES Help Valerie Karno
    Hastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 14 | Number 4 Article 11 1-1-1991 Protection of Endangered Gorillas and Chimpanzees in International Trade: Can CITES Help Valerie Karno Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_international_comparative_law_review Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Valerie Karno, Protection of Endangered Gorillas and Chimpanzees in International Trade: Can CITES Help, 14 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 989 (1991). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol14/iss4/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protection of Endangered Gorillas and Chimpanzees in International Trade: Can CITES Help? By VALERIE KARNO* Member of the Class of 1991 I. INTRODUCION At least forty thousand primates are traded internationally every year.' Of these, at least thirteen thousand are sold illegally.2 Smugglers are currently trading live, endangered primates throughout the world,3 and statistics indicate that unless this trade is stopped, certain primates, such as the gorilla and wild chimpanzee, will shortly be extinct.4 Over the last twenty years, commerce practices have caused between forty and ninety thousand needless chimpanzee deaths.5 The effect of these deaths on the viability of the species is profound. Field surveys estimate the current world chimpanzee population at less than 250,000 individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Delisting Wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains: Congress Cries
    Copyright © 2011 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120. he f .return.o .the.children.of.the.night.to.the.North- Delisting Wolves ern . Rocky. Mountains. (NRM). has. been. one. of. the .most.contentious.campaigns.in.the.wolf.war .. TEnvironmental. groups. support. the. return. of. the. wolf,. a. in the Northern summit .predator,.to.restore.ecological.balance,.maintain. biodiversity,. and. preserve. the. genetic. heritage .. The. live- stock .industry.views.the.return.of.its.nemesis.as.a.threat. Rocky Mountains: to .its.economic.vitality ..Hunters.oppose.the.return.of.the. wolf, .which.is.a.competitor.for.the.killing.of.large.game .. Congress Cries Western .states.are.hostile.to.the.return.of.the.wolf,.which.is. seensn .a .a .infringement.of.traditional.state.authority.over. wildlife .and.another.example.of.federal.public.land.policy. Wolf that.threatens.vital.state.economic.and.cultural.interests . This .Article.will.provide.a.brief.history.of.the.campaign,. which . demonstrates. the. important. role. of. the. courts. in. wolf .recovery ..It.will.analyze.the.Montana.federal.district. court . decision. in. 2010. restoring. endangered. and. threat- ened .species.status.to.wolf.in.the.NRM ..It.will.point.out. that .the.court’s.decision,.which.held.that.the.NRM.Dis- tinct .Population.Segment.(DPS)1. ecan.not.b .subdivided. by.Edward.A ..Fitzgerald on .a.state-by-state.basis,.was.correct ..Several.post-litigation. Edward.A ..Fitzgerald.is.a.Professor.of.Political. events . that. raise. questions. about. the. decision. are. exam- Science .at.Wright.State.University . ined .. Wyoming. federal.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolves Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services May 2021 Gray Wolves Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series Eric M. Gese Research Wildlife Biologist USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Logan, Utah John P. Hart District Supervisor USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services Grand Rapids, Minnesota Patricia A. Terletzky Geospatial Analyst Department of Wildland Resources Utah State University Logan, Utah Figure 1. Gray wolf (Canis lupus). Quick Links Human-Wildlife Conflicts 1 Human-Wildlife Conflicts Damage Identification 4 The gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a wide- States. Gray wolves were listed as an Management Methods 6 ranging carnivore with a global endangered species in 1974. Subsequent distribution throughout the northern recovery efforts have resulted in wolf Economics 16 hemisphere. Wolves are the largest populations in the western Great Lakes Species Overview 19 member of the family Canidae (Figure 1). Region, the northern Rocky Mountains, the southwest (Mexican wolf), and the Pacific Legal Status 22 It is often considered a symbol of the wilderness. Northwest. Glossary & Keywords 23 Resources 24 Historically, wolves were found throughout Wolf conflicts are primarily related to North America. By the 1940s, however, predation on livestock, pets and other Appendix 29 wolves were eradicated from most of their domestic animals, as well as their direct former range in the continental United and indirect impacts on native Page 2 WDM Technical Series─Gray Wolves ungulates (i.e., big game). Economic losses vary parasites, including the hydatid worm, Echinococcus widely with some livestock producers facing high granulosus. It can be transmitted to people and grows into levels of depredation in some areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Scriptie
    Dissertation 2011-2012 Vanessa Almeida da Silva Amorim Wolf V Dog – Predator V Pet 4 BDAO Titel Predator V Pet – the difference between wolves and dogs Abstract Dogs play a prominent role in modern day society. Most of them are kept for companionship which translates into a very close dog-human relationship. Canis familiaris have adapted incredibly well to man-made society however with an increasing number of cases ending up in shelters it is fair to say that this subject still needs further exploration. A lot has been written about the way dogs behave and how owners can improve their relationship with their pet. A very popular vision on dog behaviour is the wolf pack theory also called lupomorphism. For a long time the interpretation of this vision consisted in the need for a dog owner to be a leader by any means. If an owner is not strong enough as a leader a dog will try to take over this role and show behaviour that is not desirable. Recent studies have shown that there are gaps in this theory. The vision on how a wolf pack functions has changed and there is an increasing number of experts that agree that the best study subject for dog behaviour is in fact the dog itself. The goal of this thesis is to clarify how dogs and wolves relate to each other as species both biologically and psychologically. A lot of literature research has gone into this thesis to try and find out what really goes on inside a dog’s head and if comparing them to wolves is useful to grasp that idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Primates
    ISSN 1413-4703 NEOTROPICAL PRIMATES A Journal of the Neotropical Section of the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group Volume 15 Number 1 January 2008 Editors Erwin Palacios Liliana Cortés-Ortiz Júlio César Bicca-Marques Eckhard Heymann Jessica Lynch Alfaro Liza Veiga News and Book Reviews Brenda Solórzano Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna PSG Chairman Russell A. Mittermeier PSG Deputy Chairman Anthony B. Rylands Neotropical Primates A Journal of the Neotropical Section of the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA ISSN 1413-4703 Abbreviation: Neotrop. Primates Editors Erwin Palacios, Conservación Internacional Colombia, Bogotá DC, Colombia Liliana Cortés Ortiz, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Júlio César Bicca-Marques, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil Eckhard Heymann, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany Jessica Lynch Alfaro, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA Liza Veiga, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil News and Books Reviews Brenda Solórzano, Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna, Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México Founding Editors Anthony B. Rylands, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Conservation International, Arlington VA, USA Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna, Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México Editorial Board Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK Adelmar F. Coimbra-Filho, Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Carolyn M. Crockett, Regional Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Stephen F. Ferrari, Universidade Federal do Sergipe, Aracajú, Brazil Russell A. Mittermeier, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA Marta D.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hippopotamus Amphibius) AZA Species Survival Plan® Yellow Program
    Population Analysis & Breeding and Transfer Plan River Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) AZA Species Survival Plan® Yellow Program AZA Species Survival Plan® Coordinator & AZA Studbook Keeper John Davis, Riverbanks Zoo & Garden ([email protected]) Adjunct Population Advisor Colleen Lynch, Riverbanks Zoo & Garden ([email protected]) 2 October 2014 Executive Summary Species Survival Plan® for the River Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) The river hippopotamus population at the time of analysis consists of 98 (37.60.1) individuals at 37 institutions in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The Wild Pig, Peccary, and Hippo Taxon Advisory Group (TAG) designated the River hippopotamus to be managed as a SSP in their 2008 Regional Collection Plan (RCP) with a target population size of 101. This population currently qualifies as a Yellow SSP Program. Of special concern to this population is the high degree of unknownness in the pedigree. Only 55% of the living population’s pedigree is known (i.e., traces back to known or assumed wild ancestors). Genetic management of this population can only be conducted in a rudimentary fashion by avoiding close inbreeding where possible and by attempting to keep family lines equal. However, due to the long lifespans of these animals, even a simple genetic management strategy such as avoidance of close inbreeding will be difficult to implement for those animals with unknown pedigrees and unknown origins. The Program should continue to investigate unknown origin & unknown pedigree animals in order
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Status Assessment for the Alexander Archipelago Wolf (Canis Lupus Ligoni)
    FINAL SUMMARY REPORT Peer Review of Draft Status Assessment for the Alexander Archipelago Wolf (Canis lupus ligoni) REGION 7 OFFICE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE September 10, 2015 Prepared for: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1011 E Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Prepared by: 2 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & 0 2 Infrastructure, Inc. 0 104 West Anapamu Street, Suite 204A K S Santa Barbara, CA 93101 t r e USFWS Order No. F13PB00307 e t Amec Foster Wheeler Project No. 32106C011 N W W a s h i n g t TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Background .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Summary of Peer Reviewer Responses ............................................................... 2 Question 1 .............................................................................................. 3 Question 2 .............................................................................................. 3 Question 3 .............................................................................................. 4 Other Comments ..................................................................................... 5 4.0 Overall Summary for Each Reviewer .................................................................... 6 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Data Science for the One Plan Approach: Exploring the Potential of Species360 in Synergy with Other Biodiversity Databases
    Data Science for the One Plan Approach: Exploring the potential of Species360 in synergy with other biodiversity databases CONVENORS: Dalia A. Conde, Jim Gunter & Lionel Jouvet AIM: The goal of this working group is to find the best ways to leverage data on more than 21 000 species from our members for conservation planning. INTRODUCTION: Data on species life history traits, such as fertility and reproduction are essential for conservation planning. However, the lack of such data for most of the described species is overwhelming. In this workshop we want to explore how can we maximize the use of Species360’s global data on more than 21 000 species, 10 million individuals, and 170 million medical and husbandry records. Species360 is a global, non-profit, organization dedicated to gathering, sharing, and standardizing information of the animals under more our members care. Data from Species360's members have been used to answer the different question in species life history and evolution (Tidere et al. 2016). Furthermore, there is example of the utilization of the data for species conservation planning. These range from estimating the potential of threatened species in zoos to act as insurance populations or as a source of information for species when there is no data (Conde et al. 2011). For example, we have been able to estimate opportunities and costs to protect species either in the wild and captivity by merging Species360 with other databases, such as World Bank social indicators, urbanization projections, and the IUCN Red List Projects to fight the illegal species trade are being developed by using more detail data from Species360 (Conde et al.
    [Show full text]