Self-Love and Self-Liking in the Moral and Political Philosophy of Bernard Mandeville and David Hume

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Self-Love and Self-Liking in the Moral and Political Philosophy of Bernard Mandeville and David Hume Self-love and self-liking in the moral and political philosophy of Bernard Mandeville and David Hume MIKKO TOLONEN i ii MIKKO TOLONEN Self-love and self-liking in the moral and political philosophy of Bernard Mandeville and David Hume Academic dissertation to be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XII, on the 5th of January, 2010 at 12 o’clock. iii Helsinki 2009 Copyright: Mikko Tolonen ISBN: 978-952-92-6669-2 Hansaprint Oy iv CONTENTS Acknowledgements vi Abbreviations and conventions viii Introduction 1 PART I: INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF BERNARD MANDEVILLE 23 1. Mandeville and the publishing history of The Fable of the Bees 24 2. Early Mandeville and Pierre Nicole 93 3. Later Mandeville and the history of civil society 150 PART II: DAVID HUME AND GREATNESS OF MIND 191 4. Portrait of a gentleman 192 5. Social theory of A treatise of human nature 236 6. Politics and the science of man in Hume’s Essays 302 Epilogue: Hume’s mature position on greatness of mind 356 Bibliography 360 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Markku Peltonen introduced me to intellectual history and suggested the study of David Hume for my master’s thesis in 2001. Three profound impacts have shaped my research since then. My involvement in the postgraduate studies network Meaning, Language and Changing Cultures at the University of Helsinki since 2003 steered my work into a philosophical direction thanks to the influence of Simo Knuuttila and Kari Saastamoinen. A turn toward book history, inspired by Noel Malcolm and Richard Serjeantson, occurred during my stay in Cambridge in 2005–2006. But the most important transformation concerned my attitude and it was solely influenced by Markku Peltonen’s example of a hardworking scholar. I am deeply grateful to all the people who have been involved in the process of writing this thesis. I am particularly thankful to Markku Peltonen for his supervision and support. He took an interest in my work early on, encouraged me to learn more and never slipped into unnecessary formalities. Kari Saastamoinen has read and commented on my work at different stages and provided not only moral but also financial support giving me a job as his research assistant when it was most needed. The pre- examiners John Robertson and Richard Serjeantson have gone through the extensive trouble of carefully reading the manuscript offering many invaluable suggestions on how to improve it. It is an honour that John Robertson agreed to act as the official opponent. I would like to thank Richard Serjeantson, too, for his amity and indispensable help. Thanks are also due to Mikko Saikku as the representative of the Faculty of Arts at the public defence of the dissertation. I thank the network Meaning, Language and Changing Cultures at the University of Helsinki and particularly Päivi Pahta, who coordinated the network during my funding period. More recently, I have become a member of the Philosophical Psychology, Morality and Politics Research Unit (PMP), a Centre of Excellence in research of the Academy of Finland. I am very grateful to Simo Knuuttila for the opportunity to be part of PMP. I would also like to thank Juha Sihvola, Virpi Mäkinen and extend my appreciation to the entire unit and the Early Modern Ethics and Politics Team in particular. In addition, generous grants from the Cultural Foundation (Ida Sabina Packalén Fund and Taru, Ilmari and Pentti Manninen Fund), the Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth Foundation and Academy of Finland grant for research abroad are gratefully acknowledged. A part of Chapter 5 has appeared in Hume Studies. The Renvall Institute has been my collegial home. I would like to thank the directors of the Institute, Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen for taking me on board and Lars-Folke Landgrén for letting me stay. I am also grateful to all the members of the Institute, especially my former and present colleagues in the Prussian Room for tolerating my occasional unsociability. In addition ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS to comradeship, I thank Jani Marjanen for his help in preparing this dissertation for printing. At the Department of History, Erkki Kouri has always supported my aspirations. I would like to thank the members of Kouri’s and Peltonen’s research seminars. I have had the opportunity to test and develop the arguments of this dissertation in front of international audiences. Of all the valuable gatherings, I would like to mention the 32nd Annual Hume Conference in Toronto in July 2005 and the Hont-Robertson Intellectual History Symposium organised by Knud Haakonssen in Sussex in May 2006. I would also like to thank Donald Ainslie, Hans Blom, Rachel Cohon, Harold J. Cook, Michael B. Gill, Edward Hundert, Roger Emerson, Giles Mandelbrote, James Moore, Irwin Primer, M. A. Stewart, John P. Wright and, in particular, Noel Malcolm for discussing different aspects of this work with me. Furthermore, I would like to thank the staff of the British Library; University Library, Cambridge; the Wren Library; King’s College Library, Cambridge; The Bodleian Library; Amherst College Library; The National Library of Finland; the Wellcome Library; the National Library of Scotland and the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. Friendship and scholarship may go hand in hand. I would like to acknowledge the History of Philosophy Research Seminar at the University of Helsinki and the former Pengerkadun Koulukunta in Kallio. While it would be impossible to thank all the individuals who have helped this process, I would like to mention my debts of gratitude to Doohwan Ahn, Jani Hakkarainen, Marc Hanvelt, Jan Hartman, Pirkko Hautamäki, Felicity Henderson, Petter Korkman, Juhana Lemetti, Vili Lähteenmäki, Antti Matikkala, Heikki Mikkeli, Ville Paukkonen, Martina Reuter, Sami-Juhani Savonius-Wroth, Koen Stapelbroek, Jaakko Tahkokallio and Antti Tahvanainen. I am privileged to have friends I have known since we were little boys. They decided to pursue careers in fields other than the Humanities, but it would be scurrilous of me not to express my unreserved gratitude to Riku, Tommi, Otto and Samu. My ever-supporting parents Mai and Pauli, my brother Otto and my in- laws in Argentina have been a crucial source of help and support. My son Maximo has brightened my days since my work on Hume began in 2001. He will make a tremendous older brother when Minimo is born next spring. My wife Laura has been with me since we were 17-year-old high-school exchange students on a strange North American continent back in 1993. Laura has not only shared most of her life with me, she also came to the rescue and corrected the language of this thesis – and like the first day I met her, she still has black hair. Espoo, December 2009 MT vii ABBREVIATIONS AND CONVENTIONS The following abbreviations and short-title references are used throughout the dissertation. BL British Library, London Bodl. Bodleian Library, Oxford CUL University Library, Cambridge EHU David Hume, An enquiry concerning human understanding, Tom L. Beauchamp, ed., Oxford University Press, 2000. EPM David Hume, An enquiry concerning the principles of morals, Tom L. Beauchamp, ed., Oxford University Press, 1998. Hume, ‘Essay on David Hume, ‘A historical essay on chivalry and chivalry and modern modern honour’, Ernest Campbell Mossner, ed., honour’ Modern philology, 45, 1947, pp. 57–60. Hume, Essays David Hume, Essays: moral, political and literary, Eugene F. Miller, ed., 2nd ed., Liberty Classics, 1987. Hume, History David Hume, The history of England. From the invasion of Julius Caesar to the revolution in 1688, William B. Todd, ed., 6 vols., Liberty Fund, 1983. Hume, Letters David Hume, The letters of David Hume, J. Y. T. Greig, ed., 2 vols., Oxford, 1932. Hume, New letters David Hume, New letters of David Hume, Raymond Klibansky and Ernest C. Mossner, eds., Oxford Clarendon Press, 1954. Mandeville, The Fable Bernard Mandeville, The fable of the bees, or private of the Bees vices, publick benefits, with a commentary critical, historical, and explanatory by F. B. Kaye, 2 vols., Liberty Fund, [1924], 1988, volume I. ABBREVIATIONS AND CONVENTIONS Mandeville, Part II Bernard Mandeville, The fable of the bees, or private vices, publick benefits, with a commentary critical, historical, and explanatory by F. B. Kaye, 2 vols., Liberty Fund, [1924], 1988, volume II. T David Hume, A treatise of human nature, David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton, eds., Oxford University Press, 2007. References to Hume’s works follow the standard method of the Hume Society. I am citing the Treatise according to the policy where one cites both the Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume and the older Selby- Bigge/Nidditch (SBN) edition. The editors of the Clarendon edition of the works of David Hume have attached a number to every paragraph, and refer to particular pages by a series of Arabic numerals. Thus, “T 3.1.1.9” refers to the Treatise III i 1, at SBN 458. (My citing of the previous example would be T 3.1.1.9; SBN 458.) When I refer to this work in the text, I use either A treatise of human nature or the Treatise. I cite Enquiry concerning the principles of morals following a similar principle, citing the paragraph from the Clarendon edition and indicating the corresponding page in the Selby- Bigge/Nidditch (SBN) edition. When I have seen it necessary to modify the use of standard editions of Hume’s works (including his Essays), I refer to the original edition in the footnote. When I specifically refer to an editor’s commentary of a particular work, I refer to him instead of the author. For example, F. B. Kaye’s introduction to his edition of The Fable of the Bees would be cited: Kaye, The Fable of the Bees, pp.
Recommended publications
  • Edinburgh University Press in Journal of Scottish Philosophy
    THIS IS AN ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT OF AN ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS IN JOURNAL OF SCOTTISH PHILOSOPHY. THE VERSION OF RECORD IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: HTTP://WWW.EUPPUBLISHING.COM/DOI/FULL/10.3366/JSP.2014.0060. WHAT CAN AN EGOIST SAY AGAINST AN EGOIST? ON ARCHIBALD CAMPBELL’S CRITICISMS OF BERNARD MANDEVILLE CHRISTIAN MAURER (Université de Fribourg, Switzerland) ABSTRACT Like Bernard Mandeville, Archibald Campbell develops a profoundly egoistic conception of human psychology. However, Campbell attacks numerous points in Mandeville’s moral philosophy, in particular Mandeville’s treatment of self-love, the desire for esteem, and human nature in general as corrupt. He also criticises Mandeville’s corresponding insistence on self- denial and his rigorist conception of luxury. Campbell himself is subsequently attacked by Scottish orthodox Calvinists - not for his egoism, but for his optimism regarding postlapsarian human nature and self-love. This episode demonstrates that the debates on egoism in Mandeville should be seen in the context of the debates on postlapsarian human nature. WHAT CAN AN EGOIST SAY AGAINST AN EGOIST? ON ARCHIBALD CAMPBELL’S CRITICISMS OF BERNARD MANDEVILLE CHRISTIAN MAURER Université de Fribourg (Switzerland) PRELIMINARY REMARKS ON EGOISM There are good reasons to discuss the topic of egoism (in some sense), both in analyses of Bernard Mandeville’s writings and in analyses of the reactions they provoked. Neither Mandeville nor his critics use the term ‘egoism’, of course, but debates on egoism (in some sense) were undeniably crucial to early eighteenth-century moral philosophy.1 In this essay, I will focus on the psychological context and use the notion of egoism in the broad and uncontroversial sense that marks those desires as ‘egoistic’ or self-interested where the agent wants to procure some kind of good for herself, for example pleasure, self-preservation, power, reputation or glory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution and Revenge Porn
    Pace Law Review Volume 35 Issue 1 Fall 2014 Article 8 Symposium: Social Media and Social Justice September 2014 The Constitution and Revenge Porn John A. Humbach Pace University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal Remedies Commons Recommended Citation John A. Humbach, The Constitution and Revenge Porn, 35 Pace L. Rev. 215 (2014) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol35/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Constitution and Revenge Porn John A. Humbach* “Many are those who must endure speech they do not like, but that is a necessary cost of freedom.”1 Revenge porn refers to sexually explicit photos and videos that are posted online or otherwise disseminated without the consent of the persons shown, generally in retaliation for a romantic rebuff.2 The problem of revenge porn seems to have emerged fairly recently,3 no doubt facilitated by the widespread practice of sexting.4 In sexting, people make and send explicit pictures of themselves using digital devices.5 These devices, in their very nature, permit the pictures to be easily shared with the entire online world. Although the move from sexting to revenge porn might seem as inevitable as the shifting winds * Professor of Law at Pace University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME Dimensions of Interest and Boredom In
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 397 840 IR 018 028 AUTHOR Small, Ruth V., And Others TITLE Dimensions of Interest and Boredom in Instructional Situations. PUB DATE 96 NOTE 16p.; In: Prbceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (18th, Indianapolis, IN, 1996); see IR 017 960. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Achievement; Brainstorming; Cognitive Style; College Students; Educational Strategies; Higher Education; Instructional Development; *Instructional Effectiveness; Instructional Material Evaluation; *Learning Strategies; Likert Scales; Participant Satisfaction; Questionnaires; Relevance (Education); *Stimulation; Student Attitudes; *Student Motivation; Teacher Role; Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS ARCS Model; *Boredom; Emotions ABSTRACT Stimulating interest and reducing boredom are important goals for promoting learning achievement. This paper reviews previous research on interest and boredom in educational settings and examines their relationship to the characteristics of emotion. It also describes research which seeks to develop a model of learner interest by identifying sources of "boring" and "interesting" leaming situations through analysis of learners' descriptions. Participants is, the study were 512 undergraduate and graduate students from two universities. Descriptive responses were elicited from 350 students through brainstorming
    [Show full text]
  • Applying a Discrete Emotion Perspective
    AROUSAL OR RELEVANCE? APPLYING A DISCRETE EMOTION PERSPECTIVE TO AGING AND AFFECT REGULATION SARA E. LAUTZENHISER Bachelor of Science in Psychology Ashland University May 2015 Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS IN PSYCHOLOGY At the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY May 2019 We hereby approve this thesis For SARA E. LAUTZENHISER Candidate for the Master of Arts in Experimental Research Psychology For the Department of Psychology And CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY’S College of Graduate Studies by __________________________ Eric Allard, Ph.D. __________________________ Department & Date __________________________ Andrew Slifkin, Ph. D. (Methodologist) __________________________ Department & Date __________________________ Conor McLennan, Ph.D. __________________________ Department & Date __________________________ Robert Hurley, Ph. D. __________________________ Department & Date Student’s Date of Defense May 10, 2019 AROUSAL OR RELEVANCE? APPLYING A DISCRETE EMOTION PERSPECTIE TO AGING AND AFFECT REGULATION SARA E. LAUTZENHISER ABSTRACT While research in the psychology of human aging suggests that older adults are quite adept at managing negative affect, emotion regulation efficacy may depend on the discrete emotion elicited. For instance, prior research suggests older adults are more effective at dealing with emotional states that are more age-relevant/useful and lower in intensity (i.e., sadness) relative to less relevant/useful or more intense (i.e., anger). The goal of the present study was to probe this discrete emotions perspective further by addressing the relevance/intensity distinction within a broader set of negative affective states (i.e., fear and disgust, along with anger and sadness). Results revealed that participants reported relatively high levels of the intended emotion for each video, while also demonstrating significant affective recovery after the attentional refocusing task.
    [Show full text]
  • About Emotions There Are 8 Primary Emotions. You Are Born with These
    About Emotions There are 8 primary emotions. You are born with these emotions wired into your brain. That wiring causes your body to react in certain ways and for you to have certain urges when the emotion arises. Here is a list of primary emotions: Eight Primary Emotions Anger: fury, outrage, wrath, irritability, hostility, resentment and violence. Sadness: grief, sorrow, gloom, melancholy, despair, loneliness, and depression. Fear: anxiety, apprehension, nervousness, dread, fright, and panic. Joy: enjoyment, happiness, relief, bliss, delight, pride, thrill, and ecstasy. Interest: acceptance, friendliness, trust, kindness, affection, love, and devotion. Surprise: shock, astonishment, amazement, astound, and wonder. Disgust: contempt, disdain, scorn, aversion, distaste, and revulsion. Shame: guilt, embarrassment, chagrin, remorse, regret, and contrition. All other emotions are made up by combining these basic 8 emotions. Sometimes we have secondary emotions, an emotional reaction to an emotion. We learn these. Some examples of these are: o Feeling shame when you get angry. o Feeling angry when you have a shame response (e.g., hurt feelings). o Feeling fear when you get angry (maybe you’ve been punished for anger). There are many more. These are NOT wired into our bodies and brains, but are learned from our families, our culture, and others. When you have a secondary emotion, the key is to figure out what the primary emotion, the feeling at the root of your reaction is, so that you can take an action that is most helpful. .
    [Show full text]
  • Augustinian Motifs in Mandeville's Theory of Society
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 19, Number 2 (Fall 2016): 317–338 Copyright © 2016 Augustinian Motifs Joost W. Hengstmengel in Mandeville’s Faculty of Philosophy Erasmus Institute for Philosophy Theory of Society and Economics In the eighteenth century, the Dutch-born satirist Bernard Mandeville was generally associated with deism and atheism. Nowadays scholarly opinions about his theo- logical outlook are strongly divided. Instead of reassessing what Mandeville really believed, this article focuses on three theological motifs that recur in Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees. These typically Augustinian ideas concerning the fall of man, the two faces of evil, and the distinction between worldly and real happiness deserves more attention than they have hitherto received. Even if E. G. Hundert is right that Mandeville “abandoned the Augustinian premises” of the Calvinists and the Jansenists, he clearly did not forsake all of them. I argue that the three motifs are part of a framework within which Mandeville develops his theory of man and society. Interestingly, Mandeville’s well-known thesis “private vices, public benefits” also seems to build on these Augustinian ideas. Introduction1 The physician and philosopher Bernard Mandeville (1660–1733) was undoubtedly one of the most controversial writers of the eighteenth century. His is one of only a few names that were mentioned in one and the same breath with Machiavelli, Spinoza, and Hobbes; in the early modern period, this certainly was no compli- ment. In the eyes of his contemporaries, Mandeville, like these other radical writers, had dared to undermine sacred religion, true virtue, and good order. The Anglo-Dutch writer proposed a plan for the establishment of public houses of prostitution, authored a book with liberal thoughts on religion and theology, and produced erotic dialogues and poems.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambiguous Loss: a Phenomenological
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by SHAREOK repository AMBIGUOUS LOSS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXPLORATION OF WOMEN SEEKING SUPPORT FOLLOWING MISCARRIAGE By KATHLEEN MCGEE Bachelor of Science in Human Development and Family Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2011 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 AMBIGIOUS LOSS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXPLORATION OF WOMEN SEEKING SUPPORT FOLLOWING MISCARRIAGE Thesis Approved: Dr. Kami Gallus Dr. Amanda Harrist Dr. Karina Shreffler ii Name: KATHLEEN MCGEE Date of Degree: MAY, 2014 Title of Study: AMBIGUOUS LOSS: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXPLORATION OF WOMEN SEEKING SUPPORT FOLLOWING MISCARRIAGE Major Field: HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY SCIENCE Abstract: Miscarriage is a fairly common experience that is overlooked by today’s society. Miscarriage as simply a female medical issue does not embody the full emotional toll of the experience. Research is lacking on miscarriage and the couple relationship. Even further, a framework for understanding miscarriage is nonexistent. This study aims to explore the phenomenon of miscarriage as well as provide a framework for understanding miscarriage. The current study will look at miscarriage through the lenses of ambiguous loss theory and trauma theory. The sample consisted of 10 females, five who interviewed as individuals and 5 who interviewed with their partners as a couple. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with each individual participant, and the five couples were interviewed as a couple as well. From the data, six themes and four subthemes emerged for the female experience: Emotional toll, Stolen dreams, No one understands, He loves me in a different way, Why? I don’t understand, and In the end, I have my faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics: a Moral Inquiry with Religious Origins
    American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2011, 101:3, 166–170 http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi 10.1257/aer.101.3.166 = Economics: A Moral Inquiry with Religious Origins By Benjamin M. Friedman* Its secure foundation as an empirically based The commonplace view today is that the discipline notwithstanding, economics from its emergence of “economics” out of the European inception has also been a moral science. Adam Enlightenment of the eighteenth century was an Smith’s academic appointment was as profes- aspect of the more general movement toward sor of moral philosophy, and not only his earlier secular modernism in the sense of a historic turn Theory of Moral Sentiments but the Wealth of in thinking away from a God-centered universe, Nations, too, reflects it. Both books are replete toward what we broadly call humanism. To the with analyses of individuals’ motivations and contrary, I suggest that the all-important tran- psychological states, and the ways in which sition in thinking that we rightly identify with what we now call “economic” activity, carried Adam Smith and his contemporaries and follow- out in inherently social settings, enables them ers—the key transition that gave us economics as to lead satisfying lives or not. Even the divi- we now know it—was powerfully influenced by sion of labor, which Smith hailed from the then-controversial changes in religious belief in very first sentence of the Wealth of Nations( as the English-speaking Protestant world in which the key to enhanced productivity, is subject) to they lived. Further, those at-the-outset influences explicitly moral reservations—because it erodes of religious thinking not only fostered the subse- individuals’ capacities for “conceiving any gen- quent spread of Smithian thinking, especially in erous, noble or tender sentiment” and for judg- America, but shaped the course of its reception.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Mandeville's Materialism
    Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, Volume 9, Issue 1, Spring 2016, pp. 1-31. http://ejpe.org/pdf/9-1-art-1.pdf Treating of bodies medical and political: Dr. Mandeville’s materialism HAROLD J. COOK Brown University Abstract: Medicine was one of the chief empirical and philosophical sources for early modern political economy, helping to move analysis from moral to natural philosophy, and Mandeville was educated as a physician. He adopted a materialistic view of the body and passions that could be found at Leiden and a few other places at the time. When he emigrated to London, he also became embroiled in some of the heated political debates about the best kind of medical practice, joining the party that sought new medical methods from the empirical observation of experts like himself, who used their knowledge to intervene in the physical bodies of their patients rather than to persuade them to alter their ways of life. Skilful politicians were like skilful physicians, requiring them to understand the bodily passions. His politics therefore remained concerned with the nature of persons rather than societies. Keywords: London medical institutions, empiricism, passions, remedies Experience, though noon auctoritee Were in this world, is right ynogh for me. Geoffrey Chaucer, The wife of Bath of Bath’s prologue and tale Bernard Mandeville is correctly known for helping to ground modern ideas of political economy in a naturalistic social psychology, affecting the views of David Hume, Adam Smith, perhaps Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and others. While speaking in his own identifiable voice, as a Dutch immigrant and physician in Britain he articulated philosophical and political positions well known on the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrying Matters Too Far.Pdf
    CARRYING MATTERS TOO FAR? MANDEVILLE AND THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY SCOTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF MORALS EUGENE HEATH State University of New York at New Paltz abstract Mandeville offers an evolutionary explanation of norms that pivots on the power of praise to affect individuals. Yet this sort of account is not mentioned by Hume or Ferguson, and only indirectly noted by Smith. Nonetheless, there are various similarities in the thought of Mandeville and these philosophers. After delineating some resemblances, the essay takes up the objection Hume poses to Mandeville: praise fails to motivate if individuals take no pride in moral conduct. To this challenge there is a Mandevillean response that emphasizes how, in the evolutionary emergence of norms, the original praise need not be understood in moral terms. Key Terms: evolution, normativity, praise, David Hume, Adam Ferguson, Adam Smith introduction Bernard Mandeville achieved notoriety for defending what his contemporaries viewed as a selfish account of human conduct. Not only did they regard Mandeville as painting an egoistic portrait of human nature but they typically understood his conjectural history of society to reduce morality to an artificial creation of politicians. However, Mandeville’s appeal to the politicians may also be understood, as in the second volume of The Fable of the Bees, as an explanation less of the acts of specific legislators than of the slow, piecemeal evolutionary The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 12.1 (2014): 95–119 DOI: 10.3366/jsp.2014.0064 © Edinburgh University Press www.euppublishing.com/jsp 95 Eugene Heath emergence of social norms and institutions. Without doubt, Mandeville’s purported egoism and his appeal to political artifice would animate and antagonize a host of eighteenth-century thinkers, including Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, Adam Ferguson, and Adam Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment Natural Law and Enlightenment Classics
    natural rights on the threshold of the scottish enlightenment natural law and enlightenment classics Knud Haakonssen General Editor iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui ii ii ii iinatural law and iienlightenment classics ii ii ii ii iiNatural Rights ii iion the Threshold of the ii ii iiScottish Enlightenment ii iiThe Writings of ii iiGershom Carmichael ii ii iiEdited by James Moore ii iiand Michael Silverthorne iiTexts translated from the Latin ii iiby Michael Silverthorne iiForeword by James Moore ii ii ii ii ii iiliberty fund ii iiIndianapolis ii ii iiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu This book is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a foundation established to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. The cuneiform inscription that serves as our logo and as the design motif for our endpapers is the earliest-known written appearance of the word ‘‘freedom’’ (amagi), or ‘‘liberty.’’ It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 b.c. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash. ᭧ 2002 Liberty Fund, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 06 05 04 03 02 c 54321 06 05 04 03 02 p 54321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carmichael, Gershom, 1672–1729. [Works. English. 2002] Natural rights on the threshold of the Scottish enlightenment : the writings of Gershom Carmichael / edited by James Moore and Michael Silverthorne ; texts translated from Latin by Michael Silverthorne ; foreword by James Moore. p. cm. — (Natural law and enlightenment classics) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-86597-319-9 (alk. paper)—isbn 0-86597-320-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscripts Collected by Thomas Birch (B. 1705, D. 1766)
    British Library: Western Manuscripts Manuscripts collected by Thomas Birch (b. 1705, d. 1766), D.D., and bequeathed by him to the British Museum, of which he was a Trustee from 1753 until his death ([1200-1799]) (Add MS 4101-4478) Table of Contents Manuscripts collected by Thomas Birch (b. 1705, d. 1766), D.D., and bequeathed by him to the British Museum, of which he was a Trustee from 1753 until his death ([1200–1799]) Key Details........................................................................................................................................ 1 Provenance........................................................................................................................................ 1 Add MS 4106–4107 TRANSCRIPTS OF STATE PAPERS and letters from public and private collections, made by or for Birch, together with.................................................................................... 8 Add MS 4109–4124 ANTHONY BACON TRANSCRIPTS.Transcripts and extracts of the correspondence of Anthony Bacon (d. 1601), chiefly in..................................................................................................... 19 Add MS 4128–4130 ESSEX (DEVEREUX) PAPERSTranscripts of original letters and papers in the British Museum, Lambeth Palace Library,............................................................................................. 32 Add MS 4133–4146 FORBES PAPERS. Vols. II–XV.4133–4146. Collections of Dr. Patrick Forbes, consisting of lists, copies, etc., of.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]