DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar Cycle Variation Offif

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

0021-9169~92 $5 Ml+ Gil Prrgamon Press Ltd Solar cycle variation offiF R. P. KANE INPE-C.P. 5 15-SIo Jose dos Campos-SP 12201-Brasil (Recriced in,fincrl,firm 19 August 1991: ucwpted I October 1991) Abstract-For solar cycle 19 (1954-1964), the 12 monthly mean values of noon-timefoF2 at Ahmedabad (23’ N, 73’ E) show a large hysteresis effect when plotted against sunspot number or against geomagnetic Ap. However, a multiple regression analysis for the dependence of,fuF2 on solar 2800 MHz tlux and geomagnetic Ap, simul/uneousl~, shows a better matching. Thus, long-term predictions need to take into account not just sunspot number but some solar index and geomagnetic index as two key parameters, simultaneously. 1. INTRODUCTION San Marco satellite. HEATH and SCHLESINGER(1986) showed that the core-to-wing ratio of the Mg II h and ionospheric electron density is mainly due to the ion- k absorption lines near 280 nm, obtained from Solar ization of neutral atmosphere by solar radiation, Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) observations from mainly in the ultraviolet and X-ray region. Since the the NIMBUS-7 satellite, provides a measure of solar solar radiation has an 1 I-yr cycle, similar changes are UV variability. These measurements are available expected in ,foF2. Traditionally sunspot number is since 1979. However, there is another solar index considered a primary index of solar activity. However, namely the Ottawa 10.7 cm solar radio flux F(10) a comparison of ,ftiF2 and sunspot numbers shows available regularly since 1947. The F( 10) index is some discrepancies. For low and medium sunspot roughly similar to the sunspot number. so much so numbers, the relationship is reasonably linear. At that almost linear relationships have been formulated large sunspot numbers&F2 seems to show saturation by MEDD and COVINGTON(1958) and JOACHIM(1966). effects. Also,,foF2 behaviour during the rising part of However, on a finer scale, F( 10) differs from the the solar cycle is different from the behaviour during sunspot number. For example, during solar cycle 21 the falling part, resulting into a sort of hysteresis effect (197551986), the sunspots reached a maximum value (OSTROW and POKEMPNEK. 1952 ; G~PALA RAO and of - I60 in 1979 and then fell to - 140 by the end of SAMBASIVA RAO, 1969). APPLETON and PIGGOTT 198 1. In this interval, F( 10) was almost constant at (1955) pointed out that, for the same sunspot number, - 190. Also, during solar minima (1975-1976 and the degree of magnetic storminess may cause different 198551986), the sunspot number dropped to -20 but effects on,fbF2. F(lO) remained near - 80. On the other hand, F(10) The sunspot number is convenient for use because has some similarities with the variations of some EUV of its long series of reliable observations. However, and UV components of solar radiation (DONNELLYet what is relevant for ,foF2 changes is the variation al., 1986; DONNELLY, 1987). For long-term variations, of extreme ultraviolet radiation. All solar radiations F( 10) seems to have a behaviour intermediate between show the II-yr sunspot cycle; but the magnitudes sunspot numbers and EUV. For example, LAKSHMIet are different in different wavelengths. Also, all rise a/. (1988) showed that the saturation effect of,jbF2 simultaneously from the sunspot minimum but some for large sunspot numbers disappeared when EUV reach their maximum values earlier than the others flux in the range 17-l 9 nm was used instead of sunspot (LEAN, 1987; DONNELLY, 1988). Hence, a part of the number. Recently, KANE (1992) re-examined that saturation and hysteresis effects could be due to the analysis and showed that use of F(lO) showed satu- fact that sunspot numbers were used instead of the ration effects in between those using sunspot number relevant EUV radiation. However, measurements of and EUV. In the present communication, we re-exam- EUV have been rather meagre. especially in the past. ine the analysis of GOPALA RAO and SAMBASIVARAO HINTERECGER(1980) reported an intercomparison of (1969) to check whether the hysteresis effects are EUV data from several monochrometers on the AE-E reduced by using F( IO) instead of sunspot number and satellite for 1976-1980. However, these data stopped also examine quantitatively the effect of geomagnetic after 1980 and may be available in future only from the activity. 1201 1202 R. P. KANE 2. DATA peaks, one in 1957-1958 and another (larger) one in 1960. GOPALARAO and SAMBASIVARAO (1969) analysed the monthly median values of noon foF2 from 1954 3. HYSTERESIS to 1964 for 42 stations. Plots vs sunspot numbers showed hysteresis effects which were large at middle Figure 2a shows a plot of foF2 (Ahmedabad) vs latitudes and small at equatorial and high latitudes. sunspot number RZ and is the same as that in Fig. 1 From these, we chose the plots for Ahmedabad of GOPALA RAO and SAMBASIVARAO (1969). Full (23.O”N, 72.6-E) which showed a substantial hys- lines refer to 19541960 (rise of sunspot cycle). The teresis effect. hysteresis effects, as also the saturation effects, are Figure 1 shows a plot of the 12-month moving visible. Figure 2b shows a plot of the same foF2 averages (3 months apart) of the sunspot number R,, (Ahmedabad) vs F(10) (2800 MHz) solar flux. The F(lO), foF2 (Ahmedabad) and geomagnetic Ap for hysteresis effect is still quite large and the saturation solar cycle 19 (19541964). The sunspot number RZ effect can also be seen. It seems, therefore, that using and the 2800 MHz solar radio flux F(lO) are not the solar radio flux F( 10) instead of sunspot numbers exactly alike. The F( 10) decay lasted longer. ThefbF2 does not resolve these two problems. Since the geo- peak is rather flat (saturation effect?) and lasted for magnetic Ap index attains large values during the almost 4 yr (19561960). The Ap variation had two declining sunspot cycle also, a plot offoF vs Ap could 54 5s 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 I I I I I I I I I I I I 200 - SUNSPOT RZ Rz X-X-X 2800 MHz, F ( IO) 160 AAA foF2 (AHMD) O-O-Q Ap - 425 - 60 I I I I I I D D D D D D D D 0 D 0 D 54 55 56 57 56 59 60 61 62 63 64 YEAR Fig. 1. Twelve-month moving averages (3 months apart) of sunspot number R,, 2800 MHz solar flux F(lO), foF2 at Ahmedabad (23”N, 73”E) and geomagnetic Ap, for solar cycle 19 (19541964). Solar cycle variation of fiF2 1203 where y = foF2, x = Ap and z = F(lO) solar flux. (a) Using standard formulae (BEVINGTON, 1969). the 16 direct correlation coefficients were : __-- rvy = 0.9184; ?yl = 0.9626; Y, = 0.8387. 14 .’ (2) / ,’ The partial correlation coefficients were : : 12 : r.,l,L = 0.7532; r_ = 0.8923. (3) IO RZ Both of these are almost equally large, indicating that ~~ fnF2 was dependent on both these variables namely Ap and solar flux. The final regression equation is : y = 6.23+(0.2042)Ap+(0.0210)F(10). (4) When the values of Ap and F(lO) are substituted in the right-hand side of equation (4), one gets the set of values y’, that is, the expected values of y. Figure 3a shows the observed (triangles) and expected (crosses) values of foF2 (Ahmedabad) for 1954-1964. The matching is reasonably good, indicating that solar flux 2600 MHz, F (IO) and geomagnetic Ap together can account for thefoF2 variation better, as compared to solar flux alone or 0 100 150 200 250 Ap alone. Figure 3b shows a plot of the observed vs (cl expected values. The values are near the 45” slope line. The correlation coefficient is + 0.9793. However, when points referring to the rising part of the sunspot cycle (full lines) are compared with those for the declining part (dashed lines), a small hysteresis effect is still seen, indicating that even solar flux and AP together do not explain,foF:! variations completely. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSlON Fig. 2. Twelve-month moving averages of noon-time~~2 at Ionospheric parameters are known to be dependent Ahm~abad vs (a) sunspot R, (b) 2800 MHz solar flux F(10) on solar indices, for which the moving averaged sun- and (c) geomagnetic Ap, during 1954-1964. Full lines refer to the rising part (19% 1960)of the sunspot cycle and dashed spot numbers are usually used. In this communi- lines represent the declining part (1960-1964). cation, we showed that dependence on solar indices (sunspots or 2800 MHz flux) was only partial and that a considerble dependence on geomagnetic activity was indicated. For ionospheric long-term predictions, the key parameter used is sunspot numbers (e.g. see be instructive. Figure 2c shows such a plot. As can be REDDY et al., 1979). To allow for saturation effects, a seen, the relationship is roughly linear but the scatter second degree relationship like: is large. Also, a reversed hysteresis effect is seen. As such, Ap alone cannot be considered as well-correlated JtiF2 = A+BR+CR2 (5) with,foF2. was tried fR = Sunspot number). However, for the same sunspot number, the behaviour of fuF2 could 4. MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSB be quite different, depending upon the geomagnetic activity. As such, predictions based on sunspots (or Since foF2 seems to be related to solar activity as any other solar index) alone may not be always well as geomagnetic activity, a simultaneous depen- adequate. dence on these two variables can be explored by a We suggest that a dependence on geomagnetic Multiple Regression Analysis of the form : activity also, simultaneously with the solar index, y = a,+a,x+a,z (1) should be incorporated on a routine basis.
Recommended publications
  • Statistical Properties of Superactive Regions During Solar Cycles 19–23⋆

    Statistical Properties of Superactive Regions During Solar Cycles 19–23⋆

    A&A 534, A47 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116790 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Statistical properties of superactive regions during solar cycles 19–23 A. Q. Chen1,2,J.X.Wang1,J.W.Li2,J.Feynman3, and J. Zhang1 1 Key Laboratory of Solar Activity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PR China e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 National Center for Space Weather, China Meteorological Administration, PR China 3 Helio research, 5212 Maryland Avenue, La Crescenta, USA Received 26 February 2011 / Accepted 20 August 2011 ABSTRACT Context. Each solar activity cycle is characterized by a small number of superactive regions (SARs) that produce the most violent of space weather events with the greatest disastrous influence on our living environment. Aims. We aim to re-parameterize the SARs and study the latitudinal and longitudinal distributions of SARs. Methods. We select 45 SARs in solar cycles 21–23, according to the following four parameters: 1) the maximum area of sunspot group, 2) the soft X-ray flare index, 3) the 10.7 cm radio peak flux, and 4) the variation in the total solar irradiance. Another 120 SARs given by previous studies of solar cycles 19–23 are also included. The latitudinal and longitudinal distributions of the 165 SARs in both the Carrington frame and the dynamic reference frame during solar cycles 19–23 are studied statistically. Results. Our results indicate that these 45 SARs produced 44% of all the X class X-ray flares during solar cycles 21–23, and that all the SARs are likely to produce a very fast CME.
  • Properties of the Solar Velocity Field Indicated by Motions of Sunspot Groups and Coronal Bright Points

    Properties of the Solar Velocity Field Indicated by Motions of Sunspot Groups and Coronal Bright Points

    DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Naturwissenschaflichen Fakultät der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz Properties of the solar velocity field indicated by motions of sunspot groups and coronal bright points Ivana Poljančić Beljan begutachtet von Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arnold Hanslmeier Institut für Physik Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz und Dr. Roman Brajša, scientific advisor Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy University of Zagreb 2018 Thesis advisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hanslmeier Arnold Ivana Poljančić Beljan Properties of the solar velocity field indicated by motions of sunspot groups and coronal bright points Abstract The solar dynamo is a consequence of the interaction of the solar magnetic field with the large scale plasma motions, namely differential rotation and meridional flows. The main aims of the dissertation are to present precise measurements of the solar differential rotation, to improve insights in the relationship between the solar rotation and activity, to clarify the cause of the existence of a whole range of different results obtained for meridional flows and to clarify that the observed transfer of the angular momentum to- wards the solar equator mainly depends on horizontal Reynolds stress. For each of the mentioned topics positions of sunspot groups and coronal bright points (CBPs) from five different sources have been used. Synodic angular rotation velocities have been calculated using the daily shift or linear least-square fit methods. After the conversion to sidereal values, differential rotation profiles have been calculated by the least-square fitting. Covariance of the calculated rotational and meridional velocities was used to de- rive the horizontal Reynolds stress. The analysis of the differential rotation in general has shown that Kanzelhöhe Observatory for Solar and Environmental research (KSO) provides a valuable data set with a satisfactory accuracy suitable for the investigation of differential rotation and similar studies.
  • On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24

    On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24

    On Polar Magnetic Field Reversal in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24 Mykola I. Pishkalo Main Astronomical Observatory, National Academy of Sciences, 27 Zabolotnogo vul., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine [email protected] Abstract The Sun’s polar magnetic fields change their polarity near the maximum of sunspot activity. We analyzed the polarity reversal epochs in Solar Cycles 21 to 24. There were a triple reversal in the N-hemisphere in Solar Cycle 24 and single reversals in the rest of cases. Epochs of the polarity reversal from measurements of the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) are compared with ones when the reversals were completed in the N- and S-hemispheres. The reversal times were compared with hemispherical sunspot activity and with the Heliospheric Current Sheet (HCS) tilts, too. It was found that reversals occurred at the epoch of the sunspot activity maximum in Cycles 21 and 23, and after the corresponding maxima in Cycles 22 and 24, and one-two years after maximal HCS tilts calculated in WSO. Reversals in Solar Cycles 21, 22, 23, and 24 were completed first in the N-hemisphere and then in the S-hemisphere after 0.6, 1.1, 0.7, and 0.9 years, respectively. The polarity inversion in the near-polar latitude range ±(55–90)˚ occurred from 0.5 to 2.0 years earlier that the times when the reversals were completed in corresponding hemisphere. Using the maximal smoothed WSO polar field as precursor we estimated that amplitude of Solar Cycle 25 will reach 116±12 in values of smoothed monthly sunspot numbers and will be comparable with the current cycle amplitude equaled to 116.4.
  • Physics-Based Approach to Predict the Solar Activity Cycles Irina N

    Physics-Based Approach to Predict the Solar Activity Cycles Irina N

    Physics-Based Approach to Predict the Solar Activity Cycles Irina N. Kitiashvili1,2 1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Bay Area Environmental Research Institute; [email protected] Observations of the complex highly non-linear dynamics of global turbulent flows and magnetic fields are currently available only from Earth-side observations. Recent progress in helioseismology has provided us some additional information about the subsurface dynamics, but its relation to the magnetic field evolution is not yet understood. These limitations cause uncertainties that are difficult take into account, and perform proper calibration of dynamo models. The current dynamo models have also uncertainties due to the complicated turbulent physics of magnetic field generation, transport and dissipation. Because of the uncertainties in both observations and theory, the data assimilation approach is natural way for the solar cycle prediction and estimating uncertainties of this prediction. I will discuss the prediction results for the upcoming Solar Cycle 25 and their uncertainties and affect of Ensemble Kalman Filter parameters to resulting predictions. Data Assimilation Methodology Effect of the Ensemble Kalman Filter Parameters on predictive capabilities of Solar Cycles Observations Dynamo model SolarSC23: Cycle EnKF, 30members, 23 prediction: start 1997.5 SC23: EnKF, 50members, start 1997.5 SC23: EnKF, 150members, start 1997.5 SC23: EnKF, 300members, start 1997.5 SC23: EnKF, 400members, start 1997.5 SC23: EnKF, 500members, start 1997.5 Parker 1955,
  • Nonaxisymmetric Component of Solar Activity and the Gnevyshev-Ohl Rule

    Nonaxisymmetric Component of Solar Activity and the Gnevyshev-Ohl Rule

    Solar Physics DOI: 10.1007/•••••-•••-•••-••••-• Nonaxisymmetric Component of Solar Activity and the Gnevyshev-Ohl rule E.S.Vernova1 · M.I. Tyasto1 · D.G. Baranov2 · O.A. Danilova1 c Springer •••• Abstract The vector representation of sunspots is used to study the non- axisymmetric features of the solar activity distribution (sunspot data from Greenwich–USAF/NOAA, 1874–2016).The vector of the longitudinal asym- metry is defined for each Carrington rotation; its modulus characterizes the magnitude of the asymmetry, while its phase points to the active longitude. These characteristics are to a large extent free from the influence of a stochastic component and emphasize the deviations from the axisymmetry. For the sunspot area, the modulus of the vector of the longitudinal asymmetry changes with the 11-year period; however, in contrast to the solar activity, the amplitudes of the asymmetry cycles obey a special scheme. Each pair of cycles from 12 to 23 follows in turn the Gnevyshev–Ohl rule (an even solar cycle is lower than the following odd cycle) or the “anti-Gnevyshev–Ohl rule” (an odd solar cycle is lower than the preceding even cycle). This effect is observed in the longitudinal asymmetry of the whole disk and the southern hemisphere. Possibly, this effect is a manifes- tation of the 44-year structure in the activity of the Sun. Northern hemisphere follows the Gnevyshev–Ohl rule in Solar Cycles 12–17, while in Cycles 18–23 the anti-rule is observed. Phase of the longitudinal asymmetry vector points to the dominating (active) longitude. Distribution of the phase over the longitude was studied for two periods of the solar cycle, ascent-maximum and descent-minimum, separately.

  • Stochastic Processes in Astrophysics

    COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Director of Copyright Services sydney.edu.au/copyright Stochastic Processes in Astrophysics Patrick Noble Sydney Institute for Astronomy School of Physics The University of Sydney To my Mum and Dad Acknowledgments I would like to thank my supervisor Mike Wheatland for all of his support and guidance over the last three years. He has made me a better student than I thought I would ever be. I couldn't have asked for a better mentor, and I appreciate it so much.
  • Solar Activity Prediction of Sunspot Numbers (Verification)

    Solar Activity Prediction of Sunspot Numbers (Verification)

    JSC-16762 AUG 2 g lg~n Solar Activity Prediction of Sunspot Numbers (Verification) Predicted Solar Radio Flux Predicted Geomagnetic Indices Ap and Kp (hASA-TLI-8 11 39) SOLAR ACTIVITY PiiEDlCT ION N80-31 OF SUCiSPUl dU.1 BE& ( VhiiIFiLATIUN) . Yh EUIiTED SOL,\ B RADIO FLUX; phl;uIC'TED GEOIklrPETlC iiJUlCflS kp Ah0 Kp (USA) Us p Unclas HC A03/!lP 10 1 iSCL 33B d3/9i 33959 Mission Planning and Analysis Division August 1980 Nat~onalAeronautics and Space Administrat~on Lyndon 6.Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas SHUTTLE PROGRAH SOLAR ACTIVITY PREDICTION OF SUNSPOT NUMBERS (VERIFICATION) PKEUICTED SOLAR RADIO FLUX PREDICTED GEOMAGNETIC INDICES A K P ANL) P By Samuel R. Newman, Software Development Branch Approved : /fi7?m!u &ric R. McHenry, Chief I Software Development Branch Approved : Ronald L. Berry, Chief ---Mission planning and Analysis ~ivision Missicn Planning and Analysis Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houstor,, Texas CONTENTS Sec t ion Page 1 .0 INTRODUCTION ......................... 1 2.0 SUNSPOT NWBER PREDICTION TECHNIQUES ............. 1 3 .O CYCLE 19 SUNSPOT NUMBER PREDICTION .............. 1 4.0 -FINAL RESIDUAL CURE ..................... 1 5 .O COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTED AND OBSERVED SUNSPOT NUMBERS ... 2 6.0 -SMARY OF CYCLE 19 SUNSPOT NUMBER PREDICTION. ........ 2 7.3 PREDICTED SOLAR nux (~10.7) ................. 2 8.0 GEOMAGNETIC INDICES A, . and Kp ............... 4 9.0 ---CONCLUSIONS.......................... 5 10.0 ---REFERENCES .......................... 6 iii 80FM4 1 TABLE Table Page I SUBDIVISION OF CLASSES FOR A TYPICAL SOLAR CYCLE . 7 Figure Page 1 Flow chart for predict.ed solar activity input values ..... 8 2 Sunspot number solar cycles monthly mean values 11834-1979) ........................
  • Nasa Cr-61316 Long Range Solar Flare -Prediction

    Nasa Cr-61316 Long Range Solar Flare -Prediction

    NASA C.0NTR ACTOR REPORT NASA CR-61316 LONG RANGE SOLAR FLARE -PREDICTION By Dr. J. B. Blizard Departnmnt of Physics Denver Research Inetitute University of Denver Denver, Colorado 80210 October 1969 Final Report Pmpamd for NASA-GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Marehall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 -- --- -.--- .- _. __ -_- ____-__. 4 1lltF RNI' ClWlltlF ti mFP'IPIr IlCIF Ot, I , 100') I A )NU HAN(1lt NOI AN It I AH II l'ltlll) 1C'l' 1ON I___- - - _- - ._ 6 PIFHkUHMINb OHGAIdI/AI ION 1HJk 7. AUTHOR(S) e. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPOR r II J. B. Blizard 4130-10 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Department of Phys ics Denver Research Institute 11. CONTRACf OR GRANT NO. University of Denver NAS8-21436 Denver, Colorado 80210 13. TYPE OF R~POR~PERIOD COVERED 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Contractor Aero-Astrodynamics Laboratory 6- 681 8- 69 NASA - George C. Marshall Space Flight Center , Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 14. SPdNSORlNG AGENCY CODE (The publication of this report does, not constitute agreement with its conclusions by NASA. It is published only for the exchange and simulation of ideas.) 19. SECURITY CLASSlF. (dthio repart1 20. SECURITY CLASSIF. (of thlm pae) 21. NO. OF PAGES 22. PRICE UNCLASSIFIED UNCUS SIFIED 75 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 'Page 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT 4 3 EMPIRICAL APPROACH (Planet Conj) . 5 Empirical Flare Prediction . 6 Theoretical Flare Prediction 7 Rank Order of Planetary Effects 8 4 MAJOR EVENTS BEFORE 1942 . 16 Long Lived Giant Sunspots .
  • Here Comes Cycle 25! I Was Licensed in 1977, and What Luck from a Propagation Perspective

    Here Comes Cycle 25! I Was Licensed in 1977, and What Luck from a Propagation Perspective

    David A. Minster, NA2AA, ARRL Chief Executive Officer, [email protected] Second Century Here Comes Cycle 25! I was licensed in 1977, and what luck from a propagation perspective. With a modest station, running only 40 W and a homebrew vertical on the roof, I was able to break a pileup for Chatham Island in the Pacific — on 10 meters! This experience pales to that of Solar Cycle 19, which peaked from 1957 to 1959. The sunspots were so active that ionization levels never fully diminished during darkness, so propagation on the high bands was occurring 24 hours a day, worldwide! Even 6-meter DX around the world was routine. Relatively new hams will read this and say “What?” Interestingly, it shows us what the science has also told us: because their luck wasn’t so good coming into the hobby new Solar Cycle 25 sunspots began to show up in Novem- at the end of Solar Cycle 24. But that 10-meter band ber 2019, and we are now starting to see an uptick! you’ve been thinking was a dud is about to explode! Here comes Solar Cycle 25! And some of the latest forecasts There is still much we do not know or understand about from scientists and space weather experts have us hoping how the solar cycle works. Despite sunspots being tracked for an epic event. A theory related to the actual terminator by hand for hundreds of years, many theories — not facts of each solar cycle, and the measured time between — still abound. We’ve had satellites giving us better imag- cycles, states that a long period between cycles leads to ing and data for the last four solar cycles, which is only a lower sunspot levels, but a short period leads to much beginning.
  • The Impact of the Revised Sunspot Record on Solar Irradiance Reconstructions G

    The Impact of the Revised Sunspot Record on Solar Irradiance Reconstructions G

    The Impact of the Revised Sunspot Record on Solar Irradiance Reconstructions G. Kopp Univ. of Colorado / LASP, Boulder, CO 80303, USA [email protected] N. Krivova • C.J. Wu Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany J. Lean Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue Southwest, Washington, DC 20375, USA Abstract Reliable historical records of total solar irradiance (TSI) are needed for climate change attribution and research to assess the extent to which long-term variations in the Sun’s radiant energy incident on the Earth may exacerbate (or mitigate) the more dominant warming in recent centuries due to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases. We investigate potential impacts of the new Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations (SILSO) sunspot-number time series on model reconstructions of TSI. In contemporary TSI records, variations on time scales longer than about a day are dominated by the opposing effects of sunspot darkening and facular brightening. These two surface magnetic features, retrieved either from direct observations or from solar activity proxies, are combined in TSI models to reproduce the current TSI observational record. Indices that manifest solar- surface magnetic activity, in particular the sunspot-number record, then enable the reconstruction of historical TSI. Revisions to the sunspot-number record therefore affect the magnitude and temporal structure of TSI variability on centennial time scales according to the model reconstruction methodologies. We estimate the effects of the new SILSO record on two widely used TSI reconstructions, namely the NRLTSI2 and the SATIRE models. We find that the SILSO record has little effect on either model after 1885 but leads to greater amplitude solar-cycle fluctuations in TSI reconstructions prior, suggesting many 18th and 19th century cycles could be similar in amplitude to those of the current Modern Maximum.

  • Periodicities in Solar Radio Data Observed at 810 Mhz in Years 1957

    HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF TIME VARIATIONS OBSERVED IN THE SOLAR RADIO FLUX MEASURED AT 810 MHZ IN THE YEARS 1957-2004. S. Zięba, J. Masłowski, A. Michalec, G. Michałek, AND A. Kułak Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, ul. Orla 171, 30-244 Kraków, Poland ABSTRACT Long-running measurements of solar radio flux density at 810 MHz were analyzed in order to find similarities and differences among solar cycles and possible causes responsible for them. Detailed frequency, amplitude and phase characteristics of each analyzed time series were obtained by using modified periodograms, an iterative technique of fitting and subtracting sinusoids in the time domain, and basing on the least squares method (LSM). Solar cycles 20, 21, 22 and shorter segments around solar minima and maxima were examined separately. Also, dynamic studies with 405, 810 and 1620 days windows were undertaken. The obtained harmonic representation of all these time series indicates large differences among solar cycles and their segments. These findings show that the solar radio flux at 810 MHz violate the Gnevyshev Ohl rule for the pair of cycles 22-23. Analyzing the entire period 1957-2004 the following spectral periods longer than 1350 day: 10.6, 8.0, 28.0, 5.3, 55.0, 3.9, 6.0, 4.4 14.6 yr were detected. For spectral periods between 270 and 1350 days the 11 years cycle is not recognized. We think that these harmonics form “impulses of activity” or quasi-biennial cycle defined in the Benevolenskaya model of the “double magnetic cycle” (Hale’s 22 yr cycle and quasi-biennale cycle).

  • Probabilistic Model for Low Altitude Trapped Proton Fluxes

    Probabilistic Model for Low Altitude Trapped Proton Fluxes M.A. Xapsos, Senior Member IEEE, S.L. Huston, Member IEEE, J.L. Barth, Senior Member IEEE and E.G. Stassinopoulos, Senior Member IEEE Abstract—A new approach is developed for the assessment of low altitude trapped proton fluxes for future space missions. Low altitude fluxes are dependent on solar activity levels due to the resulting heating and cooling of the upper atmosphere. However, solar activity levels cannot be accurately predicted far enough into the future to accommodate typical spacecraft mission planning. Thus, the approach suggested here is to evaluate the trapped proton flux as a function of confidence level for a given mission time period. This is possible because of a recent advance in trapped proton modeling that uses the solar 10.7 cm radio flux, a measure of solar cycle activity, to calculate trapped proton fluxes as a continuous function of time throughout the solar cycle. This trapped proton model [1,2] is combined with a new statistical description of the 10.7 cm flux to obtain the probabilistic model for low altitude trapped proton fluxes. Results for proton energies ranging from 1.5 to 81.3 MeV are examined as a function of time throughout solar cycle 22 for various orbits. For altitudes below 1000 km, fluxes are significantly higher and energy spectra are significantly harder than those predicted by the AP8 model. I. INTRODUCTION Trapped proton fluxes are often the most important radiation consideration for spacecraft in low earth orbit. The AP8 trapped proton model [3] has provided useful information for many years and has been a de-facto standard for assessing trapped proton flux and dose.