DOCSLIB.ORG

14. Amplifiers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
14. Amplifiers 14. AMPLIFIERS 14.1 Introduction Microwave amplifiers combine active elements with passive transmission line circuits to provide functions critical to microwave systems and instruments. The history of microwave amplifiers begins with electron devices using resonant or slow-wave structures to match wave velocity to electron beam velocity. The design techniques used for BJT and FET amplifiers employ the full range of concepts we have developed in the study of microwave transmission lines, two-port networks and Smith chart presentation. In microwave systems, amplifiers play a significant role .We will start with the definitions of two port power gains and discuss the stability circles. Then we will design single-stage amplifiers for maximum gain, specified gain and low noise figure. The S parameters of a given microwave transistor can be derived from transistor equivalent circuit models based on device physics, or they can be measured directly. Generally, a manufacturer of a device intended for microwave applications will provide extensive S-parameter data to permit accurate design of microwave amplifiers. This can be verified by measurement, a step that has proven important on many occasions. For a bipolar junction transistor, in addition to intrinsic device parameters such as base resistance and collector-base capacitance, amplifier performance is strongly affected by the so-called parasitic elements associated with the device package, including base-lead and emitter-lead inductance internal to the package. Similar considerations apply to microwave field-effect transistors. The magnitude and phase angle of each of the S parameters typically vary with frequency, and characterization over the complete range of interest is necessary. Solid-state microwave amplifiers play an important role in communication where it has different applications, including low noise, high gain, and high power amplifiers. The high gain and low noise amplifiers are small signal low power amplifiers and are mostly used in the receiver side where the signal level is low. The small signal S parameter can be used in designing these low power amplifiers. The high power amplifier is used in the transmitter side where the signal should be at a high level to cross the desired distance. The intent of this chapter is to give an overview of some basic principles used in the analysis and design of the small signal low power amplifier and we will restrict ourselves to single-stage amplifier designs only. 14.2 Power Gains In this section, we will define various terms for power relating to the performance of the amplifier. Basically there are three types of power gains: s in out L Fig. 14.1 A general two-port network P • Operating power gain, G ≡ L , is defined as the ratio of the power delivered to Pin the load PL to the power input to the amplifier Pin. Pavn • Available power gain, GA ≡ , is defined as the ratio of the power available Pavs from the amplifier Pavs to the power available from the source Pavs. PL • Transducer power gain, GT ≡ , is defined as the ratio of the power delivered Pavs to the load PL to the power available from the source Pavs. The transducer power gain is equal to the operating power gain only when the amplifier is conjugate * matched to the source, i.e., Γin = ΓS . Therefore, GP>GT in general. Let us try to get the various expressions of power of an amplifier, viz., PL, Pin, Pavn and Pavs so that we can get their ratios to get the expressions of three power gains we have defined above. 1) By voltage division at the input port 1 (refer to Fig. 14.1), Zin + − + V1 = Vs = V1 + V1 = V1 (1+ Γin ) Zin + Zs Zin − Z0 Zs − Z0 ∴ Γin = , Γs = Zin + Z0 Zs + Z0 Γin Z in + Γin Z 0 = Z in − Z 0 Z in (Γin −1) = Z 0 (−1− Γin ) Z −1− Γ 1+ Γ in = in = in Z0 −1+ Γin 1− Γin + V1 1 Zin Hence, V1 = = ⋅ Vs ⋅ 1+ Γin 1+ Γin Zin + Zs 1+ Γin V 1− Γ = s . in 1+ Γ 1+ Γ 1+ Γ in in + s 1− Γin 1− Γs Vs ⋅(1− Γs ) = (1+ Γin )(1− Γs ) + (1+ Γs )(1− Γin ) V ⋅(1− Γ ) = s s 2(1− ΓsΓin ) Hence, the power delivered into the amplifier, i.e., the input power of the amplifier is + 2 1 V1 2 Pin = ⋅ ⋅(1− Γin ) 2 Z0 2 2 2 Vs (1− Γin )⋅ 1− Γs = ⋅ 2 8Z0 1− ΓsΓin 2 2 Vs 1− Γs Note that Pavs (Γs ) = Pin | ∗ . Therefore, Pavs = Pin | ∗ = ⋅ Γin =Γs Γin =Γs 2 8Z0 (1− Γs ) 2) From scattering matrix analysis at the output port 2 (refer to Fig. 14.1), − + + + − V2 = S21V1 + S22V2 and V2 = ΓLV2 − + − V2 =S21V1 + S22ΓLV2 + − S21V1 V2 = 1−S22ΓL S V (1− Γ ) = 21 s s (1−S22ΓL )(1− ΓsΓin ) − 2 2 2 2 1 V2 2 1 Vs S21 1− Γs 2 Therefore, PL = ⋅ (1− ΓL ) = ⋅ 2 2 (1− ΓL ) 2 Z0 8Z0 1−S22ΓL 1− ΓsΓin Note that Pavn (Γout ) = PL | ∗ ΓL =Γout 2 2 2 Vs S21 1− Γs 2 = ⋅ ⋅ (1− Γout ) 8Z ∗ 2 2 0 1− S22Γout 1− ΓsΓin S12S21ΓL S11 −S11S22ΓL + S12S21ΓL We also know that, Γin = S11 + = 1−S22ΓL 1−S22ΓL 2 putting this value in 1− ΓsΓin | ∗ ,we get ΓL =Γout 2 2 2 2 11−S Γ∗ − Γ Γ − Γ S S Γ∗ + Γ S S Γ∗ 1−S Γ (1− Γ )2 = ss out s 11 s 11 22 out s 12 21 out = 11 s out ∗ 2 ∗ 2 1−S22Γout 1−S22Γout 2 2 2 V S 1− Γ P = s 21 s avn 2 2 2 8Z0 1−S11Γs (1− Γout ) 3) Let us know get all the power gain ratios. 2 2 PL (1− ΓL ) S21 Operating power gain, G ≡ = 2 2 Pin 1−S22ΓL (1− Γin ) 2 2 2 2 2 P S (1− Γ )(1− Γ ) S (1− Γ ) Available power gain, G ≡ avn = 21 out s or 21 s A ∗ 2 2 2 Pavs 1−S22Γout 1− ΓsΓin 1−S11Γs (1− Γout ) 2 2 2 P S (1− Γ )(1− Γ ) Transducer power gain, G = L = 21 L s T 2 2 Pavs |1−S22ΓL | 1− ΓsΓin A special case for the transducer power gain occurs when S12 is zero or negligible. Then the device is non-reciprocal and hence in = S11 and S12=0, therefore the unilateral transducer gain is 2 2 2 P S (1− Γ )(1− Γ ) G = L = 21 L s TU 2 2 Pavs |1− S22ΓL | 1− ΓsS11 14.3 Stability s in out L Fig. 14.2 A general amplifier two-port network The stability of an amplifier is a very important consideration in a microwave circuit design. Stability or resistance to oscillation in a microwave circuit can be determined by the S-parameters. Oscillations are possible in a two-port network if either or both the input and the output port have negative resistance. In the above circuit, oscillation is possible if either input or output port impedances has a negative real part which would implies that Γin >1or Γout >1. There are two types of amplifier stability, unconditionally stable and conditionally stable. In the former, the real part of the input and output impedances of the amplifier is greater than zero for all passive load and source impedances. However, the amplifier is said to be conditionally stable or potentially unstable if the real part of the input or output impedances of the amplifier is less than zero for at least a passive load or source impedances. The stability test should be done for every frequency in the desired range. • Unconditional stability: network is unconditionally stable if Γin < 1 and Γout < 1 for all passive source and load impedances. For unconditionally stable: S12S21ΓL Γin = S11 + < 1 1−S22ΓL S12S21Γs Γout = S22 + <1 1−S11Γs If the device is unilateral,S12 = 0 , these condition reduce to S11 <1and S22 <1. The necessary and sufficient conditions for a two-port network to be unconditional stable are: 2 2 2 1− S − S + ∆ K = 11 22 >1; ∆ <1 also called as Rollet’s condition 2 S12S21 2 1− S Or, µ = 11 > 1 also known as -test. * S 22 − S11∆ + S 21S12 In practice, most of the microwave transistor amplifiers are potentially unstable because of the internal feedback. There are two ways to overcome the stability problem of the transistor amplifier. The first is to use some form of feedback to stabilize the amplifier. The second is to use a graphical analysis to determine the regions where the values of ΓS and ΓL (source and load reflection coefficients) are less than one, which means the real parts of ZIN and ZOUT are positive. • Conditional stability: Network is conditionally stable if Γin < 1and Γout < 1only for certain range of passive source and load impedances. This case is referred to as potentially unstable. Note that the stability condition of network is frequency dependent as it is possible for an amplifier to be stable at its design frequency and unstable at other frequencies. For conditionally stable: Stability circles are defined as the loci of ΓS (ΓL ) plane for which Γin =1 or ( Γout =1). Then the stability circles defines the boundary between stable and potentially unstable of ΓS and ΓL . * * (S22 − ∆S11 ) 1) CL = 2 2 S22 − ∆ S12S21 R L = 2 2 , where ∆ = S11S22 −S12S21 S22 − ∆ Output stability circles * * (S11 − ∆S22 ) 2) CS = 2 2 S22 − ∆ S12S21 RS = 2 2 S22 − ∆ Input stability circles |S11|>1 |S11|<1 CL CL RL RL (a) in < 1;stable |S22|<1 |S22|>1 CS CS RS RS < 1;stable (b) out Fig. 14.3 (a) Output stability circles and (b) input stability circles for conditionally stable device Given the S parameters of the device, we can plot the input and output stability circle to define where Γin =1 and Γout =1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Power Sources
    RF Power Generation With Klystrons amongst other things Dr. C Lingwood Includes slides by Professor R.G. Carter and A Dexter Engineering Department, Lancaster University, U.K. and The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology • Basic Klystron Principals • Existing technology • Underrating • Modulation anodes • Other options – IOTS – Magnetrons June 2011 ESS Workshop June 2 IOT June 2011 ESS Workshop June 3 IOT Output gap June 2011 ESS Workshop June 4 Velocity modulation • An un-modulated electron beam passes through a cavity resonator with RF input • Electrons accelerated or retarded according to the phase of the gap voltage: Beam is velocity modulated: • As the beam drifts downstream bunches of electrons are formed as shown in the Applegate diagram • An output cavity placed downstream extracts RF power just as in an IOT • This is a simple 2-cavity klystron • Conduction angle = 180° (Class B) June 2010 CAS RF for Accelerators, Ebeltoft 5 Multi-cavity klystron • Additional cavities are used to increase gain, efficiency and bandwith • Bunches are formed by the first (N-1) cavities • Power is extracted by the Nth cavity • Electron gun is a space- charge limited diode with perveance given by I0 K 3 2 V0 • K × 106 is typically 0.5 - 2.0 • Beam is confined by an axial magnetic field Photo courtesy of Thales Electron Devices June 2010 CAS RF for Accelerators, Ebeltoft 6 Efficiency and Perveance • Second harmonic cavity used to increase bunching • Maximum possible efficiency with second harmonic cavity is approximately 6 e 0.85
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Overview of Inductive Output Tubes
    ! ESS AD Technical Note ! ESS/AD/0033 ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!! ! !!!Accelerator Division ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Comparative Overview of Inductive Output Tubes Rihua Zeng, Anders J. Johansson, Karin Rathsman and Stephen Molloy Influence of the Droop and Ripple of Modulator onRebecca Klystron SeviourOutput June 2011 23 February 2012 I. Introduction An IOT is a beam driven vacuum electronic RF amplifier. This document represents a comparative overview of the Inductive Output Tube (IOT). Starting with an overview of the IOT, we progress to a comparative discussion of the IOT relative to other RF amplifiers, discussing the advantages and limitations within the frame work of the RF amplifier requirements for the ESS. A discussion on the current state of the art in IOTs is presented along with the status of research programmes to develop 352MHz and 704MHz IOT’s. II. Background The Inductive Output Tube (IOT) RF amplifier was first proposed by Haeff in 1938, but not really developed into a working technology until the 1980s. Although primarily developed for the television transmitters, IOTs have been, and currently are, used on a number of international high- powered particle accelerators, such as; Diamond, LANSCE, and CERN. This has created a precedence and expertise in their use for accelerator applications. IOTs are a modified form of conventional coaxial gridded tubes, similar to the tetrode, although modified towards a linear beam structure device, similar to a Klystron. This hybrid construct is sometimes described as a cross between a klystron and a triode, hence Eimacs trade name for IOTs, the Klystrode. A schematic of an IOT, taken from [1], is shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid State Modulators – Efficiency Considerations Focussing on Sic Devices –
    Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich Laboratory for High Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich Power Electronic Systems Solid State Modulators – Efficiency Considerations focussing on SiC Devices – J. Biela, S. Stathis, M. Jaritz, and S. Blume www.hpe.ee.ethz.ch / [email protected] Typical Topology of Solid State Pulse Modulator Systems AC/DC rectifier unit DC/DC converter for charging C-bank / voltage adaption Pulse generation unit Load e.g. klystron Constant Power Pulsed Power AC DC Energy Storage Pulse Klystron Modulator Load DC DC Grid Medium Voltage ⎧⎪⎪⎪⎨⎪⎪⎪⎩ Sometimes integrated V V V V t Pulse t t t Pulse 400V or MV Intermediate Buffer Capacitor Bank Pulse Voltage High Power 2 33 Electronic Systems Typical Topology of Solid State Pulse Modulator Systems Grounded klystron load I Isolation with 50Hz transformer or I Isolated DC-DC converter Typical Isolation AC DC Energy Storage Pulse Klystron Modulator Load DC DC Grid Medium Voltage V V V V t Pulse t t t Pulse 400V or MV Intermediate Buffer Capacitor Bank Pulse Voltage High Power 3 33 Electronic Systems 29 MW(35MW)/140 µs Modulator for CLIC – System Efficiency – High Power Electronic Systems CLIC System Specifications Output voltage 150:::180 kV Settling time <8 µs Output power (pulsed) 29 MW (- 35 MW) Repetition rate 50 Hz Flat-top length 140 µs Average output power 203 kW (- 245 kW) Flat-top stability (FTS) <0.85 % Pulse to pulse repeatab. <100 ppm Rise time <3 µs 819 klystrons 819 klystrons 15 MW, 142 µs circumferences 15 MW, 142 µs delay loop 73 m drive beam
    [Show full text]
  • Gan Or Gaas, TWT Or Klystron - Testing High Power Amplifiers for RADAR Signals Using Peak Power Meters
    Application Note GaN or GaAs, TWT or Klystron - Testing High Power Amplifiers for RADAR Signals using Peak Power Meters Vitali Penso Applications Engineer, Boonton Electronics Abstract Measuring and characterizing pulsed RF signals used in radar applications present unique challenges. Unlike communication signals, pulsed radar signals are “on” for a short time followed by a long “off” period, during “on” time the system transmits anywhere from kilowatts to megawatts of power. The high power pulsing can stress the power amplifier (PA) in a number of ways both during the on/off transitions and during prolonged “on” periods. As new PA device technologies are introduced, latest one being GaN, the behavior of the amplifier needs to be thoroughly tested and evaluated. Given the time domain nature of the pulsed RF signal, the best way to observe the performance of the amplifier is through time domain signal analysis. This article explains why the peak power meter is a must have test instrument for characterizing the behavior of pulsed RF power amplifiers (PA) used in radar systems. Radar Power Amplifier Technology Overview Peak Power Meter for Pulsed RADAR Measurements Before we look at the peak power meter and its capabilities, let’s The most critical analysis of the pulsed RF signal takes place in the look at different technologies used in high power amplifiers (HPA) time domain. Since peak power meters measure, analyze and dis- for RADAR systems, particularly GaN on SiC, and why it has grabbed play the power envelope of a RF signal in the time domain, they the attention over the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Arecibo 430 Mhz Radar System
    file: 430txman 12-98 draft Aug. 31, 2005 Arecibo 430 MHz Radar System Operation and Maintenance Manual Written by Jon Hagen April 2001, 2nd ed. May 2005 1 NOTE With its high-voltage and high-power, and high places, this transmitter is potentially lethal. Proper precautions must be taken to avoid electrical shock, RF exposure, and X-ray exposure. (See Section 22). Emergency Procedure: ELECTRIC SHOCK Neutralize power 1. De-energize the circuit by means of switch or circuit breaker or cut the line by an insulated cutter. 2. Safely remove the victim from contact with the energy source by using dry wood stick, plastic rope, leather belt, blanket or any other non-conductive materials. Call for help 1. Others can help you administer first aid 2. Others can call professional medical help and/or arrange transfer facilities Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) 1. Check victim's ABC A - airway: Clear and open airway by head tilt - chin lift maneuver B - breathing: Check and restore breathing by rescue breathing C- circulation: Check and restore circulation by external chest compression 2. If pulse is present, but not breathing, maintain one rescue breathing (mouth to mouth resuscitation) as long as necessary. 3. If pulse and breathing are absent, give external chest compressions (CPR). 4. If pulse and breathing are present, stop CPR, stabilize the victim. 5. Caution: Only properly trained personnel should administer CPR to avoid further harm to 2 the victim. Administer first aid for shock 1. Keep the victim lying down, warm and comfortable to maintain body heat until medical assistance arrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ampleon Company Presentation
    Microwave Journal Educational Webinar Ampleon Brings RF Power Innovations towards Industrial Heating Market Gerrit Huisman Robin Wesson Klaus Werner Nov, 17, 2016 Amplify the future | 1 Ampleon at a Glance Our Company Our Businesses • European Company / Headquarters in • Building transistors and other RF Power products Nijmegen/Netherlands for over 50 years • 1,250 employees globally in 18 sites • Industry Leader for 35 years, addressing • Worldwide Sales, Application and R&D – Mobile Broadband – Broadcast • Own manufacturing facility – Aerospace & Defense • Partnering with leading external manufacturers – ISM – RF Energy Technologies & Products Customers • Broad LDMOSTaco and GaN technology portfolio Reinier Zwemstra Beltman • Comprehensive package line-up • Chief Operations Head of Sales OutstandingOfficer product consistency Amplify the future | 2 Ampleon and RF Energy • Recognized as thought leader • Co-founder of RF Energy Alliance • Working with the leaders in new application domains Amplify the future | 3 RF Power Industrial market dominated by vacuum tubes • Current solutions mainly based on ‘old’ vacuum tube principles • Somewhat fragmented market with large and many small vendors – TWT (Traveling Wave Tubes) – Klystron – Magnetrons – CFA (Crossed Field Amplifiers) – Gyrotrons Amplify the future | 4 2020 TAM VED’s about ~$1B $1.2B in 2014 TAM VEDS Source ABI research TWT 63% Klystron 17% Gyrotron 3% magnetron Cross Field 15% 2% Not included: domestic magnetrons, Aerospace market Amplify the future | 5 Solid state penetrates the
    [Show full text]
  • Klystron Gun Arcing and Modulator Protection
    SLAC-PUB-10435 KLYSTRON GUN ARCING AND MODULATOR PROTECTION S.L. Gold Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA USA Abstract The demand for 500 kV and 265 amperes peak to power an X-Band klystron brings up protection issues for klystron faults and the energy dumped into the arc from the modulator. This situation is made worse when more than one klystron will be driven from a single modulator, such as the existing schemes for running two and eight klystrons. High power pulsed klystrons have traditionally be powered by line type modulators which match the driving impedance with the load impedance and therefore current limit at twice the operating current. Multiple klystrons have the added problems of a lower modulator source impedance and added stray capacitance, which converts into appreciable energy at high voltages like 500kV. SLAC has measured the energy dumped into klystron arcs in a single and dual klystron configuration at the 400 to 450kV level and found interesting characteristics in the arc formation. The author will present measured data from klystron arcs powered from line-type modulators in several configurations. The questions arise as to how the newly designed solid-state modulators, running multiple tubes, will react to a klystron arc and how much energy will be dumped into the arc. 1. INTRODUCTION The amount of protection required for a gun arc or a defocused beam in a microwave tube is a continual source of controversy and debate. Historically, tube companies have set protection requirements by their own experience in test. Body current interception was thought to be limited to 10 joules maximum and shutdown within 10 microseconds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free Electron Laser Klystron Amplifier Concept
    E.L. Saldin et al. / Proceedings of the 2004 FEL Conference, 143-146 143 THE FREE ELECTRON LASER KLYSTRON AMPLIFIER CONCEPT E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, and M.V. Yurkov Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), Hamburg, Germany Abstract as short as 10-100 µm have never been measured and are challenging to predict. We consider optical klystron with a high gain per cas- The situation is quite different for klystron amplifier cade pass. In order to achieve high gain at short wave- scheme described in our paper. A distinguishing feature of lengths, conventional FEL amplifiers require electron beam the klystron amplifier is the absence of apparent limitations peak current of a few kA. This is achieved by applying which would prevent operation without bunch compression longitudinal compression using a magnetic chicane. In in the injector linac. As we will see, the gain per cas- the case of klystron things are quite different and gain of cade pass is proportional to the peak current and inversely klystron does not depend on the bunch compression in the proportional to the energy spread of the beam. Since the injector linac. A distinguishing feature of the klystron am- bunch length and energy spread are related to each other plifier is that maximum of gain per cascade pass at high through Liouville’s theorem, the peak current and energy beam peak current is the same as at low beam peak cur- spread cannot vary independently of each other in the injec- rent without compression. Second important feature of the tor linac. To extent that local energy spead is proportional klystron configuration is that there are no requirements on to the peak current, which is usually the case for bunch the alignment of the cascade undulators and dispersion sec- compression, the gain will be independent of the actual tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress of the Klystron and Cavity Test Stand for the Fair Proton Linac
    WEPMA022 Proceedings of IPAC2015, Richmond, VA, USA PROGRESS OF THE KLYSTRON AND CAVITY TEST STAND FOR THE FAIR PROTON LINAC A. Schnase#, E. Plechov, J. Salvatore, G. Schreiber, W. Vinzenz, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany C. Joly, J. Lesrel, IPN Orsay, CNRS-IN2P3 Université Paris Sud, France Abstract types. This allowed us to use a 3 phase standard CEE plug, which simplifies changing of the test setup. The In collaboration between the FAIR project, GSI, and firmware was adjusted to the expected pulsed modes. In CNRS, the IPNO lab provided the high power RF operation, we need a repetition rate of 4 Hz; with some components for a cavity and klystron test stand [1]. For margin the amplifier should work at 5 Hz and actually the initial operation of the 3 MW Thales TH2181 klystron at amplifier can handle repetition rates of 10 Hz and higher. 325.224 MHz we received a high voltage modulator from The required pulse length is 0.2 ms. For testing, we used CERN Linac 4 as a loan. Here we report, how we 0.4 ms long pulses. Such pulse pattern is shown in Fig. 2. integrated the combination of klystron, high voltage The amplifier bias (yellow trace) is activated 1 ms before modulator, and auxiliaries to accumulate operating the RF is applied. The falling edge of the green trace experience. Klystron RF operation started on a water triggers the power measurement. The light blue trace cooled load, soon the circulator will be included and then shows the RF output. the prototype CH cavity in the radiation shielded area will be powered.
    [Show full text]
  • Gan Class F Power Amplifier for Klystron Replacement
    GaN Class F Power Amplifier for Klystron Replacement HV DC: 50 V Phase II HV DC: 11.6 kV RF CW: 6.1 kW RF CW: 8 kW, 33% =63% completed ~02/10/2018 Principal investigator: aveguide Alexei V W Smirnov PM: Michelle Shinn Topic 24b: NUCLEAR PHYSICS ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGY (Radio Frequency Power Sources) 1 Nuclear Physics SBIR/STTR Exchange Meeting August 7-8, 2018 The GOAL To develop a prototype and test a CW, all-solid-state, 1.497 GHz power amplifier specialized as space- compatible replacement of the VKL7811 klystron with ~16”16” footprint (and ~19” height) at >60% efficiency and ~1.5-2 W drive power. 33% >60% efficiency 19” 14.5” 2 Nuclear Physics SBIR/STTR Exchange Meeting August 7-8, 2018 NPT2024 & Pallets: Testing & Tweaking 25 NPT2024 MACOM transistors were purchased and tested using different boards. Tweaking method is developed to maximize efficiency and minimize harmonics Nuclear Physics SBIR/STTR Exchange Meeting August 7-8, 2018 NPT2024 Pallet Tweaking 2nd harmonic is suppressed below -30 dB, and 3rd harmonic below -70 dB Power increase: ~10% Efficiency: by ~3% Nuclear Physics SBIR/STTR Exchange Meeting August 7-8, 2018 4 NPT2024: Power droop @ Pin0.5% Power droop: 15% for 2hrs 40 min 5 Nuclear Physics SBIR/STTR Exchange Meeting August 7-8, 2018 Thermal instability Nuclear Physics SBIR/STTR Exchange Meeting August 7-8, 2018 6 Conclusion on NPT2024 • Low power, gain and efficiency; • Poor reproducibility and degradation; • High failure rate (>25% failed); • Performance spread (15% saturated power stdev) • Thermal instability. Available GaN power MOSFETS are not sufficient for the CW application Better CW power transistors are required.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Future Prospects of Rf Sources for Linac Applications
    Proceedings of Linear Accelerator Conference LINAC2010, Tsukuba, Japan TH103 DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF RF SOURCES FOR LINAC APPLICATIONS E. Jensen, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract necessary compression and creation of 12 GHz power is This paper gives an overview of recent results and performed by a drive beam recombination scheme [8]. future prospects on RF sources for linac applications, Table 1 tries to estimate the average power levels at including klystrons, magnetrons and modulators. different stages of the conversion from the AC power grid to the useful beam power, thus stressing the importance of INTRODUCTION the efficiency of these different stages and the resulting overall size of the installation. The last row of Table 1 Linear accelerators are key elements for many future gives the overall power conversion efficiency from the large scale particle physics facilities, both at the high AC power grid to the beam; this may not be a fair energy frontier and at the intensity frontier [1, 2]. Multi- comparison, since the total AC power includes other MW proton driver linacs are needed for spallation neutron installations not strictly related to beam acceleration, it sources and for muon production, amongst other gives however the correct orders of magnitude and allows applications. Superconducting linacs are the approach of to identify the weakest elements in the power conversion choice for FEL based X-ray sources, normal- or + − chain. superconducting linacs for e e colliders of the next generation, which require beam powers in the tens of MW Efficiency Challenge range. Since radio-frequency electromagnetic fields are The overall power conversion efficiency from the the only possible force to obtain this acceleration in power grid to the beam must be maximized for a number vacuum, highly efficient and reliable high power RF of reasons: Every MW not converted into useful beam sources with large peak and average power are a common power will still have to be installed, cooled and paid for.
    [Show full text]
  • 352-Mhz Solid State RF and Klystron Tuning
    RF Developments at the Advanced Photon Source* 352-MHz Solid State RF and Klystron Tuning D. Horan CWRF 2018 June 26, 2018 *Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, under Contract No. DE-ACO2-O6CH11357. 352-MHz Solid State Amplifier Development . Design goal is to produce a prototype 200kW system capable of driving one accelerating cavity . Two 100-kW sub-systems will drive inputs of a final waveguide hybrid combiner . 19-inch rack form factor adopted for amplifier modules to allow flexibility adapting to various output combiner devices . The technical performance of combining cavity technology is presently being evaluated CWRF 2018 -- Hsinchu, Taiwan -- June 25-29, 2018 2 352-MHz Solid State Amplifier Development -- 12kW Demonstration System . Design and build 12kW system utilizing a 108-input combining cavity populated with six inputs . Design and build six 2kW amplifier chains, including pre-driver and driver stages . Demonstrate combining cavity operation to 12kW utilizing six 2kW inputs . Demonstrate effectiveness of dynamic drain voltage control to optimize efficiency over wide dynamic range CWRF 2018 -- Hsinchu, Taiwan -- June 25-29, 2018 3 352-MHz LDMOS Amplifier Performance – A. Goel -- 2kW CW Achieved with 1.25kW Part Typical performance at Vd = 60 volts 2000.00 80.00 1800.00 70.00 1600.00 60.00 1400.00 1200.00 50.00 1000.00 40.00 800.00 30.00 Efficiency (%) Efficiency Power Out (W) 600.00 20.00 400.00 200.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 Input Power (W) MRFE6VP61K25HSR5 Pout (Watts) Efficiency (%) .
    [Show full text]