Dust Application in Professional Pest Control William H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dust Application in Professional Pest Control William H Dust Application in Professional Pest Control William H. Robinson Technical Director, B&G Equipment Company INTRODUCTION Some carriers can Dust formulations be made into a fine are very effective in powder, which treating pest harbor - increases surface ages such as cracks coverage. and crevices in Most dust formula - kitchens for cock - tions use a white or roaches, and wall voids for bed bugs and ants. gray color carrier so A small amount of dust provides long-term the application can be seen. The insecticide control of pests crawling in these enclosed and carrier are chemically joined, so that the spaces. There is renewed interest in the use of pattern of dust on the surface is the actual dust for bed bug, cockroach, and spider con - location of the insecticide. Silica aerogel is a trol, and there are new formulations and very fine dust and often does not improved dust application equipment. have a carrier. This material easily The effectiveness of dust depends on proper mixes into the air during applica - application. Dust formulations are a concen - tion and particles are small enough trated form of insecticide, so to be inhaled. Always wear only a thin surface coating is personal protective equipment needed. Dust application recommended by product labels. requires training, experience, and professional equipment. DUST APPLICATION The objectives of this bulletin The objective of a dust application is the same are to review important aspects as that for liquid application: create a lethal of using dust for controlling residue on a surface that will be contacted by a cockroaches, bed bugs, ants, crawling pest. The standard liquid spray places spiders, and other indoor pests. small droplets on a surface, while a dust appli - cation places small dry particles on a surface. DEVELOPMENT OF DUST INSECTICIDES Dust particles are smaller than droplets, but Developing a dust formulation for professional both formulations rely on the target pest to use begins with selecting an insecticide that crawl over a treated surface. provides quick knock-down and kill, and has an Dusting. Applying a thick layer of dust to a extended residual activity. The traditional surface is wasteful. Excess dust will actually pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, and other modern reduce efficacy by repelling a crawling pest classes of insecticides provide these features from a surface. The result of a dust application and many are available in dust formulations. should be a layer of The next step is to select an inert ‘carrier’ for dust particles on a the insecticide. This material helps protect the surface. An insect has active from ultraviolet light or to repel moisture to contact only a small and prevent clogging application equipment. number of particles for 2 Dust Application dust to be effective. More dust will not kill an Physical action. These materials damage the insect faster or make it any more dead. protective outer layer of the insect body. This outer layer is composed of a waxy or oily sub - Electrostatic charge. Dust particles stance that functions to protect the insect from applied through a professional loosing water. The fine particles of these prod - duster may have an electrical ucts act to absorb some of the oily layer, or charge. Dust forced through a scratch regions of the wax layer. Once the pro - plastic delivery pipe will have a tective covering is damaged, the insect will die positive electrostatic charge within a few days. when it leaves the application tip. Although this charge lasts for a short time, it Diatomaceous earth products are made from helps the dust cling to surfaces close to the tip. the fossilized bodies of aquatic diatoms.The Wood and some other surfaces have a natural structure of their skeleton negative charge, and attract positively charged absorbs the oily and wax dust particles. layer on the surface of insects. Diatomaceous Residual efficacy. The residual activity of dust formulations makes them ideal for treating earth (DE) is available as a fine powder, and inside wall voids, behind baseboards, and in typically no carrier is used. other undisturbed sites. When insecticide dust Silica and silica aerogel products are made applied away from light, humidity, and other from finely ground silica. This material is very environmental factors it remains active for absorbent and it months or even longer. The residual activity of removes the oils on silica aerogel is generally considered to be the skin of insects about 5 years. and the sharp edges can scratch the wax HOW DUSTS WORK layer. Silica aerogel is Bed bugs, cockroaches, spiders a porous material, and other crawling pests are and because it has an extreme amount of sur - killed when they pick up face area it is highly absorbent. Most silica particles of insecticide dust aerogel formulations contain the insecticide on their antennae and legs. pyrethrin, which acts as a flushing agent. The Once dust particles cling to the most common silica aerogel product, Drione ®, body or enter the mouthparts contains 40% amorphous silica and 1% after grooming, the lethal action begins. pyrethrins. Dust formulations have a physical or chemical Silica aerogel is effective in controlling a range mode-of-action, depending on the active of household pests. It can have a quick knock- ingredient. The dust formulations made from down effect, but death may take several hours. diatomaceous earth and silica, take several For example, the knock-down time for German days to kill. Death is through water loss and cockroaches is about 45 minutes, and death that may take several days to reach the lethal occurs in about 90 minutes; knockdown for level of about 30%. However, soon after bed bugs takes about 6 hours, and death contact with the dust-treated surface the occurs in about 20 hours. insect or spider will become inactive. Dust Application 3 Chemical action. crawling pests. The objective is to create a thin These materials layer of dust on all surfaces. attack the insect The equipment for dust application is designed nervous system to fit the treatment space: Electric dusters for and kill insects treating large spaces, hand dusters for treating that same was as liquid insecticides. When small spaces, and power dusters to treat every - dust particles contact the legs or antennae the thing else. active ingredient moves through the skin of the insect and enters the blood stream. ELECTRIC DUSTER Pyrethroid dust formulations attack the nerve This duster is for fibers and the insect dies quickly. The nervous treating large spaces, system is attacked at the junction of two with horizontal and nerves, or the membrane covering the nerves. vertical surfaces, with The result is excessive ‘firing’ of the nerves and a coating of dust. The shutdown of the entire system. large capacity tank can hold enough dust for Boric acid powder acts as a contact insecticide treating attics and crawlspaces without refill - because it penetrates the skin of insects to ing. The dust particles have an electrostatic (+) enter the body. The charge when they exit the application hose. The particles enter the wood rafters in attics and joists in crawl spaces body when the legs have a (-) charge. This results in a better appli - and antennae are cation because the dust particles are attracted cleaned through the to the wood surfaces. mouthparts. When quantities of boric acid are Treatment Zone. 20 square feet with the hose consumed, it acts as a stomach poison. attachment, 45 square feet with the plastic tube attached to the hose. Dust will move 10-15 feet SURFACES from the end of the hose or tube. Bare wood is common in most indoor locations Delivery Rate. 8 ounces per minute. treated with dust, such as behind baseboards and in wall voids. This is Application Rates: To treat a 50 square foot a porous substrate that space: can reduce the amount Tri-Die ® (1 oz. / 50 sq. ft.) = 8 seconds of insecticide transferred Pyganic ® (1.5 oz. / 50 sq. ft.) = 12 seconds to the legs and body of Tempo ® (8 oz. / 1,000 sq. ft.) = 3 seconds bed bugs and cockroaches as they crawl Delta Dust ® (8 oz. / 1,000 sq. ft.) = 3 seconds across it. Bare wood has deep furrows in the surface where dust particles may remain out- MINI-DUST-R of-reach of a crawling insect. APPLICATION METHODS AND EQUIPMENT This hand-held duster is for treating small Insecticide dusts are suitable for treating be - spaces and voids. The extension tips are hind baseboards, headboards, wall voids, and heavy-duty plastic and are stored in the handle attics and crawl spaces. Basically, any enclosed to prevent loss. The fan tip can be used to space this is harborage or travel route for thoroughly coat the inside of enclosed spaces. 4 Dust Application Treatment Zone. 2 to 3 square feet with the VERSADUSTER straight tip extensions, and the siphon tube positioned at the top. Dust will move about 36 inches from the end of the application tube. Delivery Rate. 1 to 4 ounces per stroke For Technicians using dust as an important part of their treatment protocol, the Versaduster is a Application Rates: Talstar ® PL (3 lbs. / 1,000 great choice. This compressed-air duster is used sq. ft.) = 1 stroke / sq. ft. for treating small spaces and enclosed voids with a limited amount of dust. The application BULB DUSTER tips include a crack-and-crevice tip along with This hand-held duster is for treating small several extensions. Application is with 1-second spaces and voids. The extension tips are pulls of the trigger and allows the Technician to heavy-duty plastic treat over many application areas in a short and this eliminates period of time with just the right amount of dust.
Recommended publications
  • Features & Benefits
    Click Here To Purchase Features & Benefits: • TAURUS SC is a water-based suspension concentrate of 9.1% Fipronil for Pre and Post-construction termite applications, and to control perimeter pests • Apply at a rate of 4 gallons of dilution per 10 linear feet per foot of depth for termites • TAURUS SC is labeled for barrier applications targeting listed occasional invaders around structures • Now with EP/LI applications PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ® Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals Caution TAURUS SC Harmful if swallowed, absorbed through skin or inhaled. Do not get in eyes, on skin Termiticide / Insecticide or on clothing. Do not breathe spray mist. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling and before eating, drinking, chewing gum, or using tobacco. Remove and It is a violation of federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent wash contaminated clothing before reuse. with its labeling. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): • For sale to, use and storage only by individuals/firms licensed or registered All pesticide handlers (mixers, loaders, and applicators) must wear long-sleeved by the state to apply termiticide and/or general pest control products. shirt and long pants, socks, shoes, and chemical-resistant gloves. All pesticide • DO NOT use this product for termite or other pest control indoors, except for handlers must wear a dust/mist filtering respirator (MSHA/NIOSH approval number label-specified applications for termite control and foam applications to wall prefix TC-21C), or a NIOSH approved respirator with any N, R, P or HE filter, when voids for control of other listed pests. working in a non-ventilated space, including but not limited to crawl-spaces and • DO NOT use on golf course turf.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Use of Lead Arsenate and Survey of Soil Residues in Former Apple Orchards in Virginia
    HISTORICAL USE OF LEAD ARSENATE AND SURVEY OF SOIL RESIDUES IN FORMER APPLE ORCHARDS IN VIRGINIA by Therese Nowak Schooley Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN LIFE SCIENCES in Entomology Michael J. Weaver, Chair Donald E. Mullins, Co-Chair Matthew J. Eick May 4, 2006 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: arsenic, lead, lead arsenate, orchards, soil residues, historical pesticides HISTORICAL USE OF LEAD ARSENATE AND SURVEY OF SOIL RESIDUES IN FORMER APPLE ORCHARDS IN VIRGINIA Therese Nowak Schooley Abstract Inorganic pesticides including natural chemicals such as arsenic, copper, lead, and sulfur have been used extensively to control pests in agriculture. Lead arsenate (PbHAsO4) was first used in apple orchards in the late 1890’s to combat the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus). The affordable and persistent pesticide was applied in ever increasing amounts for the next half century. The persistence in the environment in addition to the heavy applications during the early 1900’s may have led to many of the current and former orchards in this country being contaminated. In this study, soil samples were taken from several apple orchards across the state, ranging from Southwest to Northern Virginia and were analyzed for arsenic and lead. Based on naturally occurring background levels and standards set by other states, two orchards sampled in this study were found to have very high levels of arsenic and lead in the soil, Snead Farm and Mint Spring Recreational Park. Average arsenic levels at Mint Spring Recreational Park and Snead Farm were found to be 65.2 ppm and 107.6 ppm, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Pest Control
    SAFE PEST CONTROL U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control “For years, cockroaches have defeated our best efforts to get rid of them. We sprayed and sprayed, but they always came back. Now we under- stand there are better methods and products that really work” Environmental Health Watch Did you know...? ■ Many pesticides for home use are toxic? ■ There are alternative pest management methods that limit the use of toxic substances? ■ Mice, cockroaches, and cockroach "dust” can trigger asthma attack? What is it? Integrated pest management (IPM) is a way to remove pests, like cock- roaches, mice, and rats from a home. IPM is a common sense approach that: ■ Denies pests food, water, shelter and a way to enter the home. ■ Uses baits and powders, such as gel baits, traps and borate powder. Why use IPM? ■ IPM is safer. IPM does not use as many harmful pesticides as traditional pest control. - Avoiding pesticides is especially important in homes. Pesticides can contain long lasting, toxic chemicals or lung irritants that cause asthma attacks. Children are among those most vulnerable to exposure. IPM strategies apply pesticides only as needed and use the least hazardous pesticides to control pests. continued on back www.hud.gov/offices/lead U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development SAFE PEST CONTROL Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control Non-toxic traps can be part of an IPM strategy. If needed, call a pest control professional who uses IPM practices. If you have taken all the steps described above and still have a pest problem, you may need a professional to help.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Cyano-3-Benzoylamino-N
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 427 427 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07C 255/60 (2006.01) 25.12.2013 Bulletin 2013/52 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 10713937.0 PCT/EP2010/054862 (22) Date of filing: 14.04.2010 (87) International publication number: WO 2010/127926 (11.11.2010 Gazette 2010/45) (54) 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHENYL-BENZAMIDES FOR USE IN PEST CONTROL 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHENYL-BENZAMIDE ZUR VERWENDUNG IN DER SCHÄDLINGSBEKÄMPFUNG 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHÉNYL-BENZAMIDES DESTINÉS À ÊTRE UTILISÉS DANS LA LUTTE ANTIPARASITAIRE (84) Designated Contracting States: • HUETER, Ottmar Franz AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR CH-4332 Stein (CH) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL • MAIENFISCH, Peter PT RO SE SI SK SM TR CH-4332 Stein (CH) (30) Priority: 06.05.2009 GB 0907822 (74) Representative: Herrmann, Jörg et al 18.12.2009 GB 0922234 Syngenta Crop Protection Münchwilen AG (43) Date of publication of application: Intellectual Property Department 14.03.2012 Bulletin 2012/11 Schaffhauserstrasse CH-4332 Stein (CH) (73) Proprietor: Syngenta Participations AG 4058 Basel (CH) (56) References cited: EP-A1- 1 714 958 WO-A1-2008/000438 (72) Inventors: WO-A1-2008/074427 • JUNG, Pierre Joseph Marcel CH-4332 Stein (CH) Remarks: • GODFREY, Christopher Richard Ayles Thefile contains technical information submitted after CH-4332 Stein (CH) the application was filed and not included in this specification Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Needs Chlorpyrifos and Why (By Crop)?
    1 WHO NEEDS CHLORPYRIFOS AND WHY (BY CROP)? EXCERPTS OF COMMENTS SUBMITTED TO EPA AT EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0653 GENERAL “Consumers I have visited with that do not have any ag background are easily swayed into the belief that farmers are polluting the environment and recklessly applying chemicals. Truth is our farmers are professionals and with today’s pricing cannot afford to be over- or misapplying inputs that affect their bottom lines…. I strongly suggest that you…allow producers of the world’s food source to continue using the product chlorpyrifos.” – North Dakota farmer. “Many food crop industries in the Pacific Northwest are concerned about the impacts to pest management based on EPA’s proposed tolerance revocation of chlorpyrifos, including several minor crop groups with limited pesticide options. These industries include processed vegetables, strawberry, grass seed, mint, and cranberry. For many of these industries, chlorpyrifos has unique properties that make it an essential part of their Integrated Pest Management program. It is also an important tool for resistance management. Several of these industries have conducted research to identify effective alternatives to chlorpyrifos, but currently there aren’t viable alternatives that match the efficacy and low risk of this product for managing a number of critical pests…. A revocation of all chlorpyrifos tolerances would eliminate a number of low-risk, critical uses in cases where few alternatives exist at present, and in many cases those alternatives (neonicotinoids, pyrethroids) would be less efficacious, more expensive and have greater impacts on nontarget species including pollinators and beneficial insects. Further, the economic impacts based on resulting crop damage would be substantial.” – Oregon State University Agronomist.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorpyrifos, Part 1: Toxicology
    JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM/ WINTER 1994 • VOL.14, NO. 4 ■ INSECTICIDE FACTSHEET CHLORPYRIFOS, PART 1: TOXICOLOGY The broad spectrum organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos is the most widely used insecticide in the U.S. Total use is estimated at almost 30 million pounds per year. Like all organophosphate insecticides, chlorpyrifos affects the nervous system by inhibiting an enzyme that is important in the transmission of nerve impulses. Symptoms of acute poisoning include headache, nausea, muscle twitching, and convulsions. Chlorpyrifos poisonings are reported to state and federal agencies more often than poisonings of almost every other insecticide. In both laboratory animals and humans, chlorpyrifos can also cause delayed effects on the nervous system. Some effects have been measured years after exposure. Human birth defects have been associated with exposure to chlorpyrifos products. In pregnant laboratory animals, chlorpyrifos exposure caused fetal death. Pups that did survive were smaller pups and did not survive as well as pups from unexposed mothers. Chlorpyrifos also affects the male reproductive system; exposure to a chlorpyrifos product has caused death of cells in male rat testes and a decrease in sperm production in cattle. Chlorpyrifos has caused genetic damage in human blood and lymph cells, mice spleen cells, and hamster bone marrow cells. Immune system abnormalities have been reported from patients exposed to chlorpyrifos. Many individuals report developing sensitivities to a broad array of substances following chlorpyrifos exposure. The second part of this factsheet will discuss human exposure to chlorpyrifos and the ecological effects of chlorpyrifos. BY CAROLINE COX mary agricultural uses are for oranges, al- plications are made annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracting for Pest Control Service in Public Buildings ______A
    Contracting for Pest Control Service in Public Buildings _____________________________________________________ A. Greene Regional Entomologist U. S. General Services Administration Three Core Principles of Public Sector Contracting ______________________________________________________ Contracting is Law The Principle of Fairness Competition must be maximized No bidder can be unfairly excluded The Principle of Frugality Minimum requirements only The goal should be greatest value The Six Principal Components of Service Contracting ______________________________________________________ Program management Type of contract Estimating cost Method of award Statement of work Quality assurance 1. Program Management ______________________________________________________ Who will be the Integrated Pest MANAGER? IPM = Integrated Procurement Mission 2. Type of Contract ________________________________________________________ Janitorial service or separate contract? How will the work be ordered & paid for? Firm-Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery __________________________________________________________The Firm-Fixed-Price Contract Advantages: Minimum administrative burden Easiest type of contract to budget for Disadvantages: Highly inflated prices if bidders feel there are high cost risks, e.g.: Excessive monitoring/recordkeeping requirements High-cost, indeterminate specialty work included (e.g. termites, bird deterrence, wildlife trapping) __________________________________________________________The Firm-Fixed-Price Contract Needless (& Expensive)
    [Show full text]
  • Broadacre Pest Control After DDT
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 28 Number 3 1987 Article 2 1-1-1987 Broadacre pest control after DDT P J. Michael Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Recommended Citation Michael, P J. (1987) "Broadacre pest control after DDT," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 28 : No. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol28/iss3/2 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BROADACRE PEST CONTROL AFTER y.'4 Bv Phil Michael, Entomologist DDT may no longer be applied to broadacre crops grown in Western Australia. It is being replaced by other effective chemicals and with new methods of pest control. DDT was the most effective chemical for the control •»*mwi of several major broadacre pests in this State and farmers may well wonder why this change was necessary and how they will manage without DDT. MS«£22?!«s r Journal of Agriculture, Vol 27, No. 4, 1986 75 Benefits of DDT As DDT was effective against a wide range of insects, it sometimes reduced the numbers The outstanding effectiveness of DDT against of predators and parasites even more than a wide range of local pests was demonstrated the pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Developed Insecticides for Pest Control
    Page 2 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE September, I947 Oil Fractions And Their Toxic Vewly Developed Leasing Of Farm Lands In State Effect On Plants When Used As 'nsecticides For Thought To Be At Low Point Now Weed Killing Sprays Explained 'esf Control But Increase Is Anticipated Robert L. Metcalf (Continued from page 1) Scientific research by commercial ownership from one generation of Rental arrangements need to be nd governmental interests has re- farmers to the next. re-examined annually. ulted in an unprecedented devel- Young farmers find it a way to Trends pment of new materials showing expand their operations and earnings New procedures need to be devel- reat promise as insecticides. Intelli- more rapidly than through owner- oped to facilitate the gradual passage .ent evaluation of their potentiali- ship. of a farm from owner to son or po- ies will offer big dividends in im- Truck and crop specialists may In contrast to sprays in water solu- condense later. Thus each batch of tential purchaser with little capital. roving the efficiency of present shift their operations more readily New forms of profit sharing and tion, oils wet plant surfaces readily crude oil contains some gasoline ay pest control practices. where they lease a large part of the and tend to spread as thin films and some stove oil, and some Diesel fuel partnership contracts for farm op- DDD or TDE land they farm. eration will supplement traditional run down the stems. They penetrated etc., and each fraction may be re- Rental Arrangements moved within its own boiling range DDD or TDE is 2,2-bis-(p-chloro- leasing practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Management and Pesticides: a Historical Perspective1 Frederick M
    PI219 Pest Management and Pesticides: A Historical Perspective1 Frederick M. Fishel2 Pests in History nineteenth century. A plant disease called late blight (Figure 1) essentially eliminated potatoes, the staple food crop in Civilization has battled pests throughout history. Of the Ireland at that time. Up to a million Europeans starved to many examples of how pests have impacted human society, death during the Great Irish Famine of 1845-1847. Social one of the most infamous is the Black Plague in Europe implications of this pest infestation in Ireland included the in the fourteenth century, when millions of people — ap- largest ever migration to the United States, with more than proximately one-third of Europe’s population at that time a million people migrating to this country from Ireland — died from a mysterious disease. during that famine. At the time, the disease was believed to be the result of God’s displeasure with humanity or the result of other supernatural powers or heavenly disturbances. Additionally, innocent groups of people were blamed for spreading the plague and were persecuted by the panicked masses. Nu- merous references in art, literature, and public monuments attest to the horrors and devastation of that epidemic. Centuries later, scientific inquiry determined that a bacte- rial disease spread by rat fleas was the cause of the plague that devastated Europe. Rat fleas became infected with bacteria while feeding on diseased rats. When rats were unavailable as a food source, the fleas sought other warm- blooded hosts, often humans, thereby vectoring the disease. Today this disease, known as bubonic plague, can be treated Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pest Control Program
    PURDUE EXTENSION Safe food guidelines for small meat and poultry processors FS-22-W A Pest Control Program Introduction Basic pest control in the food Kevin Keener, Ph.D., P.E. Outline processing plant is an essential prerequisite food safety program. Food process engineer, Extension 1. What is a pest control program? 2. Common pests in the food plant Unfortunately, many processors have specialist, and associate professor never established a systematic, written of food science 2.1 Cockroaches 2.2 Flying insects pest control program. This fact sheet 2.3 Pest of stored products outlines the pests of concern and steps 2.4 Rodents that the small processor can take to 2.5 Bird pests start a pest control program. 3. Integrated pest management 1. What is a pest control program? 4. Verification of pest control All meat and poultry processing programs facilities, regardless of size, must have 5. Action steps for the processor a written Sanitation program. One section of the Sanitation program (9 CFR 416.2(a), http://a257. g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/ 14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo. gov/cfr_2002/janqtr/9cfr416.2.htm) is the control of pests: insects, rodents, and birds. GMPs (Good Manufacturing Practices) specified in the Code of The common housefly is a Federal Regulations (CFR) clearly known carrier of diseases and specify that pests cannot be present pathogens, including listeria and in the food-processing environment salmonella. The housefly vomits (CFR Title 21, Part 110.35 http://a257. stomach fluid onto its food and g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/ sucks up the dissolved nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2 INTRODUCTION
    National Registration Authority for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals, Australia Section 2 INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................65 1.1 REGULATORY INFORMATION......................................................................................................................65 2. PROTECTED INFORMATION................................................................................................................66 3. REASONS FOR THE ENDOSULFAN REVIEW....................................................................................67 4. COMMUNITY CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................67 4.1 RESPONSES FROM GROWERS......................................................................................................................68 4.2 RESPONSES FROM THE COMMUNITY .........................................................................................................69 4.3 ENDOSULFAN SURVEY ...............................................................................................................................69 5. CHEMICAL AND PRODUCT DETAILS ................................................................................................69 5.1 HISTORY OF REGISTRATION .......................................................................................................................69 5.2 USE PATTERN ............................................................................................................................................70
    [Show full text]