April 9, 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

April 9, 2015 April 9, 2015 KOREA Sector News & Analysis Major Indices Close Chg Chg (%) Steel (Overweight) KOSPI 2,058.87 -0.39 -0.02 Hyundai Steel announces merger with Hyundai Hysco KOSPI 200 258.33 -0.18 -0.07 KOSDAQ 676.96 8.93 1.34 Economy & Strategy Update Turnover ('000 shares, Wbn) April MPC Volume Value KOSPI 519,429 5,805 Expectations for a rate cut remain intact KOSPI 200 84,005 3,924 KOSDAQ 579,044 3,700 Market Cap (Wbn) Value KOSPI 1,285,499 KOSDAQ 180,759 KOSPI Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 1,421 1,349 72 Institutional 963 1,227 -264 Retail 3,371 3,188 184 KOSDAQ Turnover (Wbn) Buy Sell Net Foreign 235 185 50 Institutional 179 186 -7 Retail 3,275 3,317 -42 Program Buy / Sell (Wbn) Buy Sell Net KOSPI 839 887 -49 KOSDAQ 35 39 -4 Advances & Declines Advances Declines Unchanged KOSPI 455 359 57 KOSDAQ 613 369 58 KOSPI Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Samsung Electronics 1,483,000 4,000 251 Hynix 41,900 -700 234 KODEX LEVERAGE 11,435 -25 155 LG Chem 254,000 12,500 128 NHN 653,000 8,000 115 KOSDAQ Top 5 Most Active Stocks by Value (Wbn) Price (W) Chg (W) Value Daum Communications 110,300 3,200 152 Sansung P&C 91,800 11,900 136 GOLFZON 15,450 2,000 131 Coreana Cosmetics 7,920 380 89 Celltrion 73,500 -1,200 83 Note: As of April 9, 2015 This document is a summary of a report prepared by Daewoo Securities Co., Ltd. (“Daewoo”) and published on our website. Please review the compliance notices contained in the original report. Information and opinions contained herein have been compiled in good faith from sources deemed to be reliable. However, the information has not been independently verified. Daewoo makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Daewoo accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any loss arising from the use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. Information and opinions contained herein are subject to change without notice. This document is for informational purposes only. It is not and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This document may not be reproduced, further distributed or published in whole or in part for any purpose. Steel (Overweight/Maintain) Hyundai Steel announces merger with Hyundai Hysco Hyundai Steel to merge with Hyundai Hysco: Deal to be finalized on July 1 st , 2015 News Comment Merger likely to create only limited synergies April 9, 2015 Recommended strategy: Buy POSCO st Daewoo Securities CCo.,o., Ltd. Hyundai Steel to merge with Hyundai Hysco; Deal to be finalized on July 1 [Steel/Non-ferrous metal] On April 8th, Hyundai Steel announced it has decided to merge with Hyundai Hysco. Hyundai Hysco shareholders will receive 0.8577607 shares of Hyundai Steel for each existing Hyundai Seung-hun Jeon Hysco share they own. Dissenting shareholders will be able to exercise appraisal rights at +822-768-2713 W72,100 per share for Hyundai Steel and W63,552 per share for Hyundai Hysco, which are, [email protected] respectively, 9.2% and 6.4% lower than current share prices. The 2,667,762 shares Hyundai Hysco owns in Hyundai Steel will be allocated to Hyundai Hysco shareholders, which will have the same impact as cancelling 2% of treasury shares. As a result, the merged company will have 133,445,785 shares outstanding (rather than 136,113,547 shares). Merger likely to create only limited synergies In our view, the merger effects are more psychological than tangible. While the merger does have some benefits, we also see several negative effects that could partially offset the positives. We believe potential merger synergies between the two companies were mostly realized after Hyundai Hysco spun off its cold-rolled coil (CRC) division to Hyundai Steel in December 2013. We think the latest merger will have limited benefits, given the likelihood of 1) an increase in current Hyundai Hysco employees’ pay (which is lower than that of Hyundai Steel’s employees), and 2) margin deterioration at the steel pipe business due to the use of Hyundai Steel’s relatively expensive hot-rolled coil (HRC). We estimate the merger will boost Hyundai Steel’s EPS by 4.9% (based on the 2014 figure), but mainly as a result of the 2% treasury stock retirement. Such an impact appears to have been mostly priced in after yesterday’s rally. 2) Due to the removal of internal transactions, operating profit growth is likely to outpace revenue growth following the merger, pushing OP margin higher. But in the long term, we view this as a negative to pricing, as a seemingly high margin may work to the company’s disadvantage at a time when major customers, most notably Hyundai Motor Group (HMG), are struggling with falling margins. Recommended strategy: Buy POSCO Hyundai Steel’s and Hyundai Hysco’s stocks could rise further, in line with the overall advance of the steel sector. In the short run, however, we believe POSCO is the best bet in the sector. Hyundai Steel’s stock has gained 11.2% in the past month on merger expectations, while POSCO’s stock has fallen 7.2% during the same period amid poor industry conditions and prosecutors’ probe into the steelmaker’s former chairman. We find it hard to see Hyundai Steel’s stock continuing to rise on the merger issue alone, considering that the actual benefits of the tie-up with Hyundai Hysco will be limited. The challenging earnings outlook for HMG also poses a headwind to the steelmaker’s stock. In 4Q13, hopes of a merger similarly drove Hyundai Steel higher, pushing the stock’s P/B far above POSCO’s. But, after the deal was announced, Hyundai Steel’s P/B converged with that of POSCO in the subsequent quarter. Thus, in the near term, we believe POSCO shares are likely to catch up. We see little differentiation between Hyundai Steel’s and Hyundai Hysco’s shares, as prices will move toward the pre-set merger ratio. Analysts who prepared this report are registered as research analysts in Korea but not in any other jurisdiction, including tthehe U.S. PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & DISCLAIMERS IN APPENDIX 1 AT THE END OF REPORT. April MPC Expectations for a rate cut remain intact Expectations for a rate cut in 2Q remain intact; Bond market to stay favorable until May MPC meeting Fixed Income Report The April MPC meeting yielded several noteworthy developments. In particular, we note April 9, 2015 that: 1) the BOK revised down its 2015 real GDP estimate (to 3.1%) and CPI estimate (0.9%); 2) a minority opinion (voicing support for a rate cut) emerged; 3) the BOK Daewoo Securities CCo.,o., Ltd. emphasized the government’s role in reviving the economy; 4) some members expressed confidence in a domestic economic recovery; and 4) the BOK indicated a [Fixed Income] willingness to depend on economic data. Yeo-sam Yoon In light of the BOK’s base rate cut in March, substantial downward revisions to +822-768-4022 economic estimates were inevitable. Some market watchers predicted that real GDP [email protected] and CPI estimates would be adjusted to below the 3.0% and 1.0% levels. We projected that the BOK would lower its 2015 real GDP and CPI estimates to 3.1% and 1.0%, respectively, considering the bank’s previous stance. Given that some expected the bank to lower its GDP growth estimate to below 3.0%, its actual revision—to 3.1%, as we projected—can be expected to weigh on the bond market to some degree. Meanwhile, the BOK lowered its inflation estimate more sharply than we expected, pointing to the central bank’s concerns about the current low- inflation environment. These concerns were also reflected in its April report on monetary policy direction, which stated that the negative GDP gap would persist for a “considerable period of time.” In answer to a question about possible government stimulus measures, the BOK governor said he would agree with the idea of introducing a supplementary budget if the economic recovery appeared to be threatened by a tax revenue shortfall, indicating that fiscal measures are still needed to stabilize the economy. The BOK governor maintained his positive stance on the economy, but also sounded caution over the economic outlook. Despite the better-than-anticipated February industrial activity reading, overall economic indicators for March are likely to be dragged down by a sharp decline in daily average export growth and sluggish wholesale and retail sales. In our view, the negative outlook for March economic data is why the BOK governor said the central bank must check the sustainability of domestic demand growth to confirm the economic recovery. With regard to exports, the governor acknowledged the unfavorable environment, including the decline in petrochemical product sales resulting from the oil price downtrend, the weak yen, and the investment slowdown in China. He also acknowledged, albeit indirectly, the burden of the escalating currency war, saying that he is paying keen attention to the yen’s movements . Based on his comments, we forecast Korea’s exports to face an uphill battle throughout 2015. The governor’s comments following the MPC meeting were in line with his recent announcement that the BOK’s policy decisions would be data-dependent, similar to the US Fed.
Recommended publications
  • FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) Alteogen 0.19 KOREA Hyundai Engineering & Construction 0.35 KOREA NH Investment & Securities 0.14 KOREA AmoreG 0.15 KOREA Hyundai Glovis 0.32 KOREA NHN 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.65 KOREA Hyundai Heavy Industries 0.29 KOREA Nong Shim 0.08 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd. 0.08 KOREA Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance 0.13 KOREA OCI 0.17 KOREA BGF Retail 0.09 KOREA Hyundai Merchant Marine 1.02 KOREA Orion 0.21 KOREA BNK Financial Group 0.18 KOREA Hyundai Mipo Dockyard 0.15 KOREA Ottogi 0.06 KOREA Celltrion Healthcare 0.68 KOREA Hyundai Mobis 1.53 KOREA Paradise 0.07 KOREA Celltrion Inc 2.29 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2.74 KOREA Posco 1.85 KOREA Celltrion Pharm 0.24 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2nd Pfd. 0.33 KOREA Posco Chemical 0.32 KOREA Cheil Worldwide 0.14 KOREA Hyundai Motor Pfd. 0.21 KOREA Posco International 0.09 KOREA CJ Cheiljedang 0.3 KOREA Hyundai Steel 0.33 KOREA S1 Corporation 0.13 KOREA CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.02 KOREA Hyundai Wia 0.13 KOREA Samsung Biologics 0.92 KOREA CJ Corp 0.11 KOREA Industrial Bank of Korea 0.22 KOREA Samsung C&T 0.94 KOREA CJ ENM 0.15 KOREA Kakao 3.65 KOREA Samsung Card 0.08 KOREA CJ Logistics 0.12 KOREA Kangwon Land 0.23 KOREA Samsung Electro-Mechanics 0.81 KOREA Coway 0.36 KOREA KB Financial Group 1.78 KOREA Samsung Electronics 25.36 KOREA Daewoo Engineering & Construction 0.12 KOREA KCC Corp 0.12 KOREA Samsung Electronics Pfd.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Steel Announces Merger with Hyundai Hysco
    Steel (Overweight/Maintain) Hyundai Steel announces merger with Hyundai Hysco Hyundai Steel to merge with Hyundai Hysco: Deal to be finalized on July 1 st , 2015 News Comment Merger likely to create only limited synergies April 9, 2015 Recommended strategy: Buy POSCO st Daewoo Securities CCo.,o., Ltd. Hyundai Steel to merge with Hyundai Hysco; Deal to be finalized on July 1 [Steel/Non-ferrous metal] On April 8th, Hyundai Steel announced it has decided to merge with Hyundai Hysco. Hyundai Hysco shareholders will receive 0.8577607 shares of Hyundai Steel for each existing Hyundai Seung-hun Jeon Hysco share they own. Dissenting shareholders will be able to exercise appraisal rights at +822-768-2713 W72,100 per share for Hyundai Steel and W63,552 per share for Hyundai Hysco, which are, [email protected] respectively, 9.2% and 6.4% lower than current share prices. The 2,667,762 shares Hyundai Hysco owns in Hyundai Steel will be allocated to Hyundai Hysco shareholders, which will have the same impact as cancelling 2% of treasury shares. As a result, the merged company will have 133,445,785 shares outstanding (rather than 136,113,547 shares). Merger likely to create only limited synergies In our view, the merger effects are more psychological than tangible. While the merger does have some benefits, we also see several negative effects that could partially offset the positives. We believe potential merger synergies between the two companies were mostly realized after Hyundai Hysco spun off its cold-rolled coil (CRC) division to Hyundai Steel in December 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 1:19-cv-00776-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 1 of 65 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LG CHEM, LTD. and ) LG CHEM MICHIGAN INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. _________________ ) SK INNOVATION CO., LTD. and ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SK BATTERY AMERICA, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs LG Chem, Ltd. (“LG Chem”) and LG Chem Michigan, Inc. (“LGCMI”) (collectively “LGC” or “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file the following Complaint for trade secret misappropriation under the Defend Trade Secrets Act under 18 U.S.C. § 1836, et seq. (“DTSA”) and the Delaware Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“DUTSA”), tortious interference with a prospective business opportunity, unfair competition in violation of Delaware’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 6 Del. C. §§ 2532 et seq., conversion, and unjust enrichment against Defendants SK Innovation Co., Ltd. (“SKI”), and SK Battery America, Inc. (“SKBA”) (collectively “Defendants”), and allege as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. Defendants have systematically stolen LGC’s intellectual property and technology concerning LGC’s lithium-ion batteries, battery cells, battery modules, and battery packs, including components thereof and related production and testing systems and processes therefor. These products, systems, and processes are used in the rapidly-growing and highly-competitive Electric Vehicle (“EV”) industry. Through diligent work and heavy investment over the course of many years, LGC became a leading developer of EV batteries and related technologies. Defendants, Case 1:19-cv-00776-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 2 of 65 PageID #: 2 on the other hand, have avoided the arduous, time-consuming, and expensive process of developing their own EV battery technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyundai Steel (004020 KS /Buy )
    Hyundai Steel (004020 KS /Buy ) Stake sale likely to lead to lower interest expenses Steel and higher dividend payout Issue Comment Following the merger between Hyundai Glovis and Hyundai Mobis’s spun-off businesses, March 29, 2018 Hyundai Steel is expected to sell its stake in Hyundai Mobis for roughly W1.13tr. Cash proceeds are estimated at W820bn (factoring in capital gains taxes). If the proceeds from the sale are used to repay debt, annual interest expenses would Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. decrease and dividend payouts would likely expand. [ Metals & Mining ] Jaekwang Rhee Planning to sell Hyundai Mobis stake following merger +822 -3774 -6022 th [email protected] On March 28 , Hyundai Steel disclosed that it would sell its stake in Hyundai Mobis (012330 KS/Buy/TP: W300,000/CP: W261,000) to Hyundai Motor Group (HMG) chairman Chung Mong-koo and vice chairman Chung Eui-sun, once the merger between Hyundai Glovis (086280 KS/Buy/TP: W210,000/CP: W173,500) and Hyundai Mobis’s spun-off businesses is completed. Meanwhile, the firm will retain its stake in Hyundai Glovis. th Based on the March 28 closing price of Hyundai Mobis, we estimate the value of Hyundai Steel’s stake at W1.13tr, and actual cash proceeds from the sale (factoring in capital gains taxes) at W820bn. The actual sale price will be confirmed within two months of Hyundai Mobis’s listing change (slated for July 30 th ). Stake sale to lead to lower interest expenses and higher dividends Assuming that the spin-off and merger progress smoothly, Hyundai Steel is likely to use the proceeds from the sale of its stake in Hyundai Mobis for debt repayment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 ESG Integrated Ratings of Public Companies in Korea
    2014 ESG Integrated Ratings of public companies in Korea Korea Corporate Governance Service(KCGS) annouced 2014 ESG ratings for public companies in Korea on Aug 13. With the ESG ratings, investors may figure out the level of ESG risks that companies face and use them in making investment decision. KCGS provides four ratings for each company which consist of Environmental, Social, Governance and Integrated rating. ESG ratings by KCGS are graded into seven levels: S, A+, A, B+, B, C, D. 'S' rating means that a company has all the system and practices that the code of best practices requires and there hardly exists a possibility of damaging shareholder value due to ESG risks. 'D' rating means that there is a high possibility of damaging shareholder value due to ESG risks. Company ESG Integrated Company Name Code Rating 010950 S-Oil Corporation A+ 009150 Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. A+ 000150 DOOSAN CORPORATION A 000210 Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. A 000810 Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. A 001300 Cheil Industries Inc. A 001450 Hyundai Marine&Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. A 005490 POSCO. A 006360 GS Engineering & Construction Corp. A 006400 SAMSUNG SDI Co., Ltd. A 010620 Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd. A 011070 LG Innotek Co., Ltd. A 011170 LOTTE CHEMICAL CORPORATION A 011790 SKC Co., Ltd. A 012330 HYUNDAI MOBIS A 012450 Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. A 023530 Lotte Shopping Co., Ltd. A 028050 Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd. (SECL) A 033780 KT&G Corporation A 034020 Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. A 034220 LG Display Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Holdings-Report.Pdf
    The Fund is a closed-end exchange traded management Investment company. This material is presented only to provide information and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds are not continuously offered. After the initial public offering, shares are sold on the open market through a stock exchange. Changes to investment policies, current management fees, and other matters of interest to investors may be found in each closed-end fund's most recent report to shareholders. Holdings are subject to change daily. PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS FOR THE KOREA FUND as of July 31, 2021 *Note: Cash (including for these purposes cash equivalents) is not included. Security Description Shares/Par Value Base Market Value (USD) Percent of Base Market Value SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO 793,950 54,183,938.27 20.99 SK HYNIX INC COMMON 197,500 19,316,452.95 7.48 NAVER CORP COMMON STOCK 37,800 14,245,859.60 5.52 LG CHEM LTD COMMON STOCK 15,450 11,309,628.34 4.38 HANA FINANCIAL GROUP INC 225,900 8,533,236.25 3.31 SK INNOVATION CO LTD 38,200 8,402,173.44 3.26 KIA CORP COMMON STOCK 107,000 7,776,744.19 3.01 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD 26,450 6,128,167.79 2.37 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO 66,700 6,030,688.98 2.34 NCSOFT CORP COMMON STOCK 8,100 5,802,564.66 2.25 SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS CO LTD 7,230 5,594,175.18 2.17 KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 123,000 5,485,677.03 2.13 KAKAO CORP COMMON STOCK 42,700 5,456,987.61 2.11 HUGEL INC COMMON STOCK 24,900 5,169,415.34 2.00 SAMSUNG 29,900 4,990,915.02 1.93 SK TELECOM CO LTD COMMON 17,500 4,579,439.25 1.77 KOREA INVESTMENT 53,100 4,427,115.84
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Services
    2016 Integrated Report Outline Part. 1 Part. 2 Part. 3 Part. 4 Overview Business Review Sustainability Appendix Perfomance HHI Overview and Stock information Sustainable Financial introductions for and financial business activities statements, HHI’s business, performance and achievements GRI G4 Guidelines governance, reporting based index and other global network on management supplementary and shared value philosophy information Report Profile This report introduces Hyundai Heavy Industries’ (HHI) pursuits for sustainable development. To provide relevant information to stakeholders, this report mainly provides information about core issues derived from materiality assessment, and strived to maintain the balance between financial and non-financial information. Reporting Period and Scope Reporting period of this report is from January 1 to December 31, 2015, with the last three years’ key performance indicators provided to ensure a better understanding of changing trends. Recent business information by April 2016 has also been partially covered for the sake of providing timely information. This report is based on HHI’s activities in Korea. Reporting Principle This report is prepared in accordance with GRI (Global Reporting HHI Program Initiative) G4 Guidelines’ Core option, and with reference to the Integrated Reporting Framework of the International Integrated Reporting Council. To ensure objectivity, fairness and credibility, part. 1 part. 3 part. 4 a third party assurance was conducted by Lloyd's Register Quality Overview Sustainability
    [Show full text]
  • Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/29/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-16172, and onBILLINGgovinfo.gov CODE: 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-881] Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain cold-rolled steel flat products (cold-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea were not sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR), September 1, 2018, through August 31, 2019. DATES: Applicable [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney, George McMahon, or Marc Castillo, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475, (202) 482-1167, or (202) 482-5019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 25, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Between February 24, and March 5, 2021, Commerce received timely filed case briefs and rebuttal briefs from United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel), additional domestic parties,2 Hyundai Steel 1 See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 86 FR 6871 (January 25, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    [Show full text]
  • EMGT 835 Field Project: Global Shipbuilding, Who Will Be the Leader? South Korea Or China?
    EMGT 835 Field Project: Global Shipbuilding, Who will be the leader? South Korea or China? By Yong Jin Dan Master of Science University of Kansas Fall Semester, 2007 An EMGT Field Project report submitted to the Engineering Management Program and the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Chick Keller, Committee Chair Herb Tuttle, Committee Member Annette Tetmeyer, Committee Member 1 Executive Summary Shipbuilding is an industry that most developing countries strategically choose as a long term development plan. South Korea has also developed the shipbuilding industry as a part of governmental plan. Since 2000, South Korea has kept the leading position in the industry and seems to be dominant until in the middle of the 2010’s. South Korea’s biggest strength is design capability and technological superiority which should enable them to promptly reflect customer needs. In addition, a relatively abundant workforce, openness to innovation, strong R&D investment and the development of the related industries will also play key roles to remaining competitive in the industry. Meanwhile, China has become the second largest shipbuilder in the industry since 2006. A China’s soaring economic growth has been a big push for the shipbuilding and related industries as well. As of January 2007, China has 51% of orders place worldwide, which includes an 81% share of the low end vessel market. China is now threatening not only South Korea but also all shipbuilding countries with its price competitiveness, aggressive capacity expansion and technological cooperation with western countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubber Flooring Sales Record [Korea] 2013-2009
    1/16 Rubber Flooring Sales Record [Korea] 2013-2009 ◐ Part of Public Facilities (more than 180 in total) 2013.12. updated No. Application Year/ Month Location Project No. Application Year/ Month Location Project 1 Public 2013.08 Incheon Haksan Culture Foundation 32 Airport 2011.06 Gyeonggi Gimpo Airport International line 2 facilities 2012.02 Seosan Sweage Treatment Plant 33 facilities 2009.11 Seoul Gimpo Airport 3 2011.12 Seoul Lifelong Learning Center 34 2008.10 Incheon Incheon International Airport 4 2011.12 Chungnam Chungnam Sweage Treatment Plant 35 Government 2013.10 Seoul Yeongdeungpo Post Office 5 2011.08 Gyeonggi Gyeonggi Workforce Development Center 36 office 2013.07 Ansan Ansan Credit Guarantee Funds 6 2010.12 Seoul Eunpyeong Child Development Center 37 2013.07 Daejeon National Fusion Research Institute 7 2010.12 Chonnam Naro Space Center 38 2013.07 Cheongju Cheongju Cultural Center 8 2009.12 Gyeongbuk Uljin Sweage Treatment Plant 39 2013.06 Daejeon Credit Guarantee Funds 9 2009.11 Chungbuk Yeongdong Waste Disposal 40 2013.06 Bucheon Bucheon City Hall 10 2009.11 kangwon Chuncheon Women's Center 41 2013.06 Busan National Oceanographic Research Institute 11 2009.08 Gyeonggi Munsan Filtration Plant 42 2013.05 Chilgok Chilgok Counties Center 12 Cultural 2013.08 Ulsan Hyundai Motor Co., Cultural Center 43 2013.01 Seoul Gangseo Office of Education 13 facilities 2013.07 Gwacheon Gwacheon National Science Museum 44 2013.01 Daegu Daegu Suseong-gu(ward) Office 14 2012.11 Daegu Student Cultural Center 45 2012.12 Jeungpyeong Jeungpyeong
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Multinationals Show Solid Recovery After Global Crisis
    Korean multinationals show solid recovery after global crisis Report dated November 16, 2010 EMBARGO: The contents of this report must not be quoted or summarized in the print, broadcast or electronic media before November 16, 2010, 10:00 a.m. Seoul; 1 a.m. GMT, and 9:00 p.m. November 15, 2010, New York. Seoul and New York, November 16, 2010 The Institute of International Affairs of the Graduate School of International Studies (GSIS) at Seoul National University in Seoul, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC) at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the first annual report on leading Korean multinationals. The research for this report was conducted in 2010 and covers the period 2007 to 2009. 1 Highlights The Republic of Korea (henceforth ‘Korea’), the 11 th largest economy in the world, has now become one of the leading investors abroad. The number and the size of the corporate giants that dominate the economy have increased over the years, boosting and diversifying their investments around the world. Korea’s multinational enterprises ranked by their foreign assets (see table 1 below) show about USD 93 billion in assets held abroad. 2 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEC), a member of a leading Korean conglomerate, ranked 1 st with slightly over USD 18 billion, followed by another top conglomerate member, LG Electronics, with over USD 10 billion dollars. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, and DSME Co., Ltd, had foreign assets of over USD 8 billion each and LG Display had over USD 6 billion. The top five firms together accounted for just over half of the total foreign assets of the top 20 companies.
    [Show full text]
  • JKD/JAD April 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO
    A-580-867 POR: 08/01/2017-07/31/2018 Public Document E&C/OVI: JKD/JAD April 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeffrey I. Kessler Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance FROM: James Maeder Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations SUBJECT: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2017-2018 I. SUMMARY We have analyzed the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by interested parties. As a result of our analysis, we continue to find that the application of total adverse facts available (AFA) is appropriate for Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), as discussed below. For Hyosung Corporation and Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation (collectively, Hyosung), we have made changes from the Preliminary Results,1 as discussed below. We recommend that you approve the positions described in the “Discussion of the Issues” section of this Issues and Decision Memorandum. The complete list of the issues in this administrative review for which we received comments from parties is provided below: Hyundai-Specific Issues Comment 1: Application of AFA A) Hyundai’s Completeness Failure at Verification B) Hyundai’s Reporting of Sales Documentation C) Hyundai’s Understatement of its Home Market Gross Unit Prices D) Application of Total AFA Comment 2: Selection of AFA Rate 1 See Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 55559 (October 17, 2019) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM); see also Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Correction to the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 65350 (November 27, 2019) (Amended Preliminary Results).
    [Show full text]