DOCSLIB.ORG

The Central Philosophy of Buddhism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Central Philosophy of Buddhism Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism David J. Kalupahana FOREWORD BY ELIOT DEUTSCH THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF HAWAll Honolulu Contents Foreword IX Preface xi Acknowledgments xvii I. Pre-Buddhist Theories of Causation: The Vedic Tradition II. Pre-Buddhist Theories of Causation: The Non-Vedic Tradition 23 III. Clarification of Terminology 54 IV. The Conception of Dharma 67 V. The Causal Principle and Its Validity 89 VI. The Causal Explanation of Existence 110 VII. Later Developments 147 VIII. Causal Correlations: Another Facet of Development 163 IX. Conclusion 177 Abbreviations 186 Notes 189 Bibliography 228 Index of Chinese Terms 240 General Index 253 Foreword D. J. KALUPAHANA, chairman ofthe Department of Philosophy at the University of Hawaii, has carried out, in the tradition of his teacher K. N. Jayatilleke, a masterful articulation, analysis, and interpretation ofthe doctrines of causation in Buddhist philosophy. Special attention is given to early Buddhist teachings as found in the Pal\ Nikayas and Chinese Agamas; and by working with both Pali an~ Chinese sources Kalupahana has broadened considerably the fo~dations of scholarship in early Buddhist philosophy. In early Buddhism, Kalupahana maintains, a cause is defined as "the sum total of several factors that gives rise to a consequent"­ the "consequent" being the entire universe as well as a specific thing or event. As with the Greeks (Aristotle in particular), for whom the question of causality was not so much how one thing (efficiently) causes another, but how one thing can become some­ thing different from itself, we have in Buddhist thought a concern to account for 'development,' 'process,' 'change' in the whole of our experience. For Buddhism, causality is at once a problem in metaphysics and epistemology, and its resolution in these areas leads to a variety of ethical considerations. In recent years Western interest in Buddhism has been directed mainly to Mahayana traditions, principally to the Madhyamika school of Nagarjuna and to Zen. Professor Kalupahana is to be warmly commended for turning our attention back to the philo­ sophical riches of the early schools, where, together with profound x spiritual concerns, a good deal of sharp philosophical analysis is to be found. The author offers us as well a comprehensive historical background to Buddhist 'phenomenalism' and unravels many of the complexities in the schools associated with the so-called Thera­ vada tradition and in the later Mahayana developments. One of the most interesting analyses Kalupahana offers has to do with whether the doctrine of 'dependent origination,' or paticcasamuppada (Skt. pratTtyasamutpada), implies determinism. His manner of treating this question shows how nicely he refuses to accept any interpretation of Buddhism that does violence to the original texts for the sake of satisfying one's philosophical precon­ ceptions or predilections. Professor Kalupahana faces directly the many difficulties in the Buddhist doctrines and presents a hard-headed, no-nonsense, sympathetic but not apologetic, analysis. His work should deepen considerably philosophical interest in Buddhism and appreciation for the distinctive genius of the many extraordinary thinkers asso­ ciated with it. ELIOT DEUTSCH Preface STUDIES ON THE PHILOSOPHY of early Buddhism have so far been confined mostly to the material available in the Pali Nikayas, which represent only one of the early Buddhist traditions. Some Japanese scholars, such as Ui Hakuji and Akanuma Chizen, have examined the teachings embodied in the Chinese Agamas. Unfortunately, these treatises are not accessible to the present au­ thor because he does not know the Japanese language. Akanuma Chizen as well as Masaharu Anesaki have rendered a great service. to those interested in comparative studies of the Nikayas and the Agamas by compiling catalogues of the sutras in these two bodies of literature. The present·· work was undertaken to compare the teachings on the problem of causation in the Pali Nikayas and the Chinese Agamas. The importance of the Chinese Agamas for the study of early Buddhist thought is twofold. First, they supply cor­ roborative evidence for some of the major concepts in the Pali Nikayas, whose authenticity has been questioned by many scholars in recent times. Secondly, they throw much light on some of the obscure concepts in the Nikayas. Indian thinkers before and during the time of the Buddha put forward a wide variety of views regarding the problem of change and causality. Buddhist theory is a product of criticism, assimila­ tion, and synthesis of these ideas. Most of the earlier theories are examined in the early Buddhist texts, namely, the Pali Nikayas xii and the Chinese Agamas. In chapter 1 an attempt is made to trace the gradual development of causal theories in the Vedic tradition to establish the historical basis of some of the theories mentioned in the Pali Nikayas and the Chinese Agamas. Here the evidence from the Agamas is mainly corroborative. An examination of philo­ sophical sections of the Vedas, Brahma:Q.as, Ara:Q.yakas, and the Upani~ads has led to the conclusion that the theories of self-causa­ tion (sat-karya) and creation by God (f§vara-nirmar;.a) were two of the major causal theories in the Vedic tradition. These were referred to in the early Buddhist texts as sayarrz katarrz (tsu tsao) and issara­ nimmar;.a (tsun yu tsao) , respectively. Buddhist criticism of these theories appearing in the Pali Nikayas and the Chinese Agamas is also examined. Chapter 2 is devoted to an analysis of pre-Buddhist ideas mainly in the non-Vedic tradition. The causal theories of the Materialists, the Ajrvikas, and the J ainas are discussed in detail, especially because oftheir possible influence on the Buddhist theory of causation. Here the evidence gleaned from the Chinese Agamas is of immense value in understanding some obscure concepts, such as niyatisangatibhliva of the Ajrvikas. The close similarity between the theories of moral causation put forward in Jainism and Bud­ dhism has confused some scholars who have written on this subject, so the Jaina standpoint is discussed at length. With the help of the commentaries of SiIaIika it is possible to determine the relationship between the two schools of thought with some precision. It is pointed out how the philosophical theory of causation formulated in J ainism led to the acceptance of a deterministic theory of moral causation. The influence of some Ajrvika theories on Jainism is not overlooked. Apart from the doctrines of these major schools of thought, we examine several other theories that are mentioned in the early Buddhist texts. Chapter 3 is an attempt to elucidate the meaning of some of the terms expressing causation in the early Buddhist texts. The" different views, classical as well as modem, regarding the use of the "terms hetu (yin) and pratyaya (yuan) are discussed. All the evidence from the Pali Nikayas and the Chinese Agamas indicates that during the earliest phase of Buddhism the two terms were used synonymously and that they did not express any distinction xiii Preface comparable to the distinction between 'cause' and 'subsidiary con­ dition.' Doctrinal as well as textual evidence suggests that that distinction originated with the Sarvastivadins. A discussion of the causal principle involves an examination of the nature of things that are connected by the causal principle. Chapter 4 is therefore devoted to an analysis of the nature of causally conditioned dharma or dhamma. There are many impor­ tant disquisitions on this subject by modem scholars. Outstanding among them are (i) The Central Conception of Buddhism and the Meaning ofthe Term' Dharma' by T. I. Stcherbatsky, which is based primarily on the source material in the Abhidharmakosa, and (ii) Pali Dhamma by Wilhelm and Magdalene'Geiger, who examined almost every reference to the term dhamma in Pali literature, ca­ nonical. as well as commentarial, to bring forth the wide variety of meanings. the term connotes. A fresh look at this material was found to be necessary especially in the light of the information supplied by the Chinese Agamas. The conception of dhamma (fa) appearing in the Pali Nikayas and the Chinese Agamas was found to differ from the conceptions of dharma in some of the major schools of thought, such as the Sarvastiyada, the Sautrantika, and the later Theravada. Some scholars have minimized the difference between the teachings of early Buddhism as embodied in the Pali Nikayas and the Chinese Agamas on the one hand and those of the later schools on the other;1 we endeavor to show that the difference is far too great to be ignored. For example, the acceptance of a logi­ cal theory of momentariness (k$a1'Jikavada) instead of an empirical view of change and impermanence (anitya) gave rise to a host of problems, and their solution created significant differences not only among the later schools but also between these and early Buddhism. The Sarvastivadins, it is pointed out, accepted an eternal underlying substratum (dravya, svabhava) in things (dharma). It was this fun­ damental conception of Sarvastivada, a school that gained promi­ nence in India after the third century B.C., that was the target of Nagarjuna's dialectic. Thus, with much justification, the Mahaya­ nists attributed a theory of pudgala-nairatmya (nonsubstantiality of the individual) but not dharma-nairatmya (non substantiality of the elements) to the Sarvastivlidins and claimed superiority over them for formulating the latter conception. Since the Sarvastivada xiv was then the most prominent of the Hlnayana schools, the Mahaya­ nists, without any justification, extended their criticism to all the Hlnayana schools. Moreover, with the emergence of different Buddhist schools and the compilation of the Abhidharma literature and ancillary works, the study of the early sutra literature was relegated to the background. As a result, the Abhidharma came to be looked upon as the primary source for the study of early Buddhism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 12 Jainism, Buddhism and Ajivikas*
    Intellectual Developments UNIT 12 JAINISM, BUDDHISM AND and Asceticism AJIVIKAS* Structure 12.0 Objectives 12.1 Introduction 12.2 Rise of New Religious Ideas 12.3 Material Milieu 12.4 Gautam Buddha and the Origin of Buddhism 12.4.1 Development of Buddhism 12.5 Origin of Jainism 12.5.1 Teachings of Mahavira 12.5.2 Development of Jainism 12.6 Other Heterodox Ideas 12.7 Ajivikas 12.8 Impact of New Religious Movements 12.9 Summary 12.10 Key Words 12.11 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 12.12 Suggested Readings 12.0 OBJECTIVES In this Unit, you will learn about: the background to the rise of new religious ideas during the sixth century BCE; the emergence and growth of Buddhism and Jainism; the main tenets of these religions; the influence these religions came to wield on contemporary society; and the other heterodox ideas prevalent in the sixth century BCE. 12.1 INTRODUCTION The sixth century BCE was an important stage in Indian history as far as the development of new religions is concerned. In this period, we notice a growing opposition to the ritualistic orthodox ideas of the brahmanas. This ultimately led to the emergence of many heterodox religious movements. Among these, Buddhism and Jainism developed into well-organised popular religions. This Unit attempts to analyse the emergence and significance of these new religious ideas. Firstly, it deals with the factors that were responsible for the emergence and growth of heterodox ideas. Then it goes on to explain how the Buddha and This Unit has been adopted from EHI-02, Block 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One an Introduction to Jainism and Theravada
    CHAPTER ONE AN INTRODUCTION TO JAINISM AND THERAVADA BUDDfflSM CHAPTER-I An Introduction to Jainism and Theravada Buddhism 1. 0. History of Jainism "Jainism is a system of faith and worship. It is preached by the Jinas. Jina means a victorious person".' Niganthavada which is mentioned in Buddhist literature is believed to be "Jainism". In those days jinas perhaps claimed themselves that they were niganthas. Therefore Buddhist literature probably uses the term 'nigantha' for Jinas. According to the definition of "Kilesarahita mayanti evamvaditaya laddhanamavasena nigantho" here nigantha (S. nkgrantha) means those who claimed that they are free from all bonds.^ Jainism is one of the oldest religions of the world. It is an independent and most ancient religion of India. It is not correct to say that Jainism was founded by Lord Mahavlra. Even Lord Parsva cannot be regarded as the founder of this great religion. It is equally incorrect to maintain that Jainism is nothing more than a revolt against the Vedic religion. The truth is that Jainism is quite an independent religion. It has its own peculiarities. It is flourishing on this land from times immemorial. Among Brahmanic and i^ramanic trends, Jainism, like Buddhism, represents ^ramanic culture. In Buddhist literatures, we can find so many 'GJ, 1 ^ DNA-l, P. 104 informations about Jainism. The Nigantha Nataputta is none else but Lord Mahavlra.^ 1.1. Rsabhadeva According to tradition, Jainism owes its origin to Rsabha, the first among the twenty-four Tirthankaras. The rest of the Trrthahkaras are said to have revived and revealed this ancient faith from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragments from the Ājīvikas* Piotr Balcerowicz
    DRAFT, to be published in: Hiroshi Marui; Ernst Prets (eds.): Transmission and Tradition. Proceedings of the Matsumoto Conference on the Meaning and the Role of ‘Fragments’ in Indian Philosophy. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna 201? (forthcoming) Fragments from the Âjîvikas* Piotr Balcerowicz 1. The doctrine of Âjîvikas, an ancient Indian religion and philosophical system which predates—albeit by perhaps a slight margin—the emergence of Jainism and Buddhism, is hardly known. In the period between the fourth and second centuries BCE, it was perhaps one of the most influential non-Brahmanical religions in India, second to Buddhism,1 and despite some attempts taken by a number of scholars— such as Hermann JACOBI (1880), Bunyiu NANJIO (1884), Ernst LEUMANN (1884), D.R. BHANDARKAR (1912), K.B. PATHAK (1912), Jarl CHARPENTIER (1913), B.M. BARUA (1920), A.F. Rudolf HOERNLE (1926), A. BANERJI SASTRI (1926), B.M. BARUA (1926–1927), N. AIYASVAMI SASTRI (1941), Arthur Llewellyn BASHAM (1951), Arthur Llewellyn BASHAM (1971), Haripada CHAKRABORTI (1973), S.N. GHOSAL (1979) and (1980), Pranabananda JASH (1982a) and (1982b), Gustav ROTH (1993), Johannes BRONKHORST (2000), (2003) and (2007)—we still have an * Work on this paper has been generously supported by the National Science Centre of Poland (Research Project: History of Classical Indian Philosophy: non-Brahmanic Schools, National Science Centre, 2011/01/B/HS1/04014). 1 Its followers are mentioned three times in two Aœokan edicts, i.e. in two inscriptions from Barâbâr Hill in Bihar (BLOCH (1950: 159): 1. lâjinâ piyadassinâ duvâ-ðasa-vassâbhisittenâ iyaô niggoha- kubhâ dinnâ âjîvikehi.—‘This Banyan Cave was donated to the Âjîvikas by [the king Aœoka] Favourably Disposed, who was consecrated twelve years [ago].’; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AJIVIKAS a Short History of Their Religion Ami Philosophy
    THE AJIVIKAS A Short History of their Religion ami Philosophy PART I HISTORICAL SUMMARY Introductio n The History of the Ajivikas can broadly he divided into three periods in conformity with the three main ntasres of development through which their doctrines had passed. The general facts about these periods are summed up below with a view to indicate the precise nature of the problems that confront us in the study of each. The periods and problems are as follows: — 1. PRE-MAKKIIAM PERIOD. Problems.- -The rise of a religious order of wander- ins? mendicants called the Ajlvika from a Vanaprastha or Vaikhanasa order of the hermits, hostile alike in attitude towards the religion of the Brahmans and the Vaikhanasas, bearing yet some indelible marks of the parent asrama ; a higher synthesis in the new Bhiksu order of the three or four ilsrama* of the Brahmans. 2. MAKKHAM PERIOD. Problems.— Elevation of Ajlvika religion into a philosophy of life at the hands of Makkhali 2 THE AJIVIKAS Gosala; his indebtedness to his predecessors, relations with the contemporary Sophists, and originality of conception. 3. POST-MAKKHALI PERIOD. Problems—The further development of Ajivika religion, the process of Aryan colonisation in India, the spread of Aryan culture, the final extinction of the sect resulting from gradual transformation or absorption of the Ajivika into the Digambara Jaina, the Shivaitc and others; other causes of the decline of the faith; the influence of Ajivika religion and philosophy on Jainism, Buddhism and Hinduism; determination of the general character of a history of Indian religion. 1. PKE-MAKKHALI PERIOD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mission Accomplished
    TheThe MissionMission AccomplishedAccomplished Ven. Pategama Gnanarama Ph.D. HAN DD ET U 'S B B O RY eOK LIBRA E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.buddhanet.net Buddha Dharma Education Association Inc. The Mission Accomplished A historical analysis of the Mahaparinibbana Sutta of the Digha Nikaya of the Pali Canon. by Ven. Pategama Gnanarama Ph. D. The Mission Accomplished is undoubtedly an eye opening contribution to Bud- dhist analytical Pali studies. In this analytical and critical work Ven. Dr. Pate- gama Gnanarama enlightens us in many areas of subjects hitherto unexplored by scholars. His views on the beginnings of the Bhikkhuni Order are interesting and refreshing. They might even be provocative to traditional readers, yet be challenging to the feminists to adopt a most positive attitude to the problem. Prof. Chandima Wijebandara University of Sri Jayawardhanapura Sri Lanka. A masterly treatment of a cluster of Buddhist themes in print Senarat Wijayasundara Buddhist and Pali College Singapore Published by Ti-Sarana Buddhist Association 90, Duku Road. Singapore 429254 Tel: 345 6741 First published in Singapore, 1997 Published by Ti-Sarana Buddhist Association ISBN: 981–00–9087–0 © Pategama Gnanarama 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval systems or technologies now known or later developed, without per- mission in writing from the publisher. Cover: Mahaparinibbana; an ancient stone carving from Gandhara — Loriyan Tangai. Photograph reproduced by Mr K. C. Wong. Contents Introductory . 8 Chapter 1: The Mahaparinibbana Sutta & its Different Versions .
    [Show full text]
  • Early Buddhist Metaphysics: the Making of a Philosophical Tradition
    EARLY BUDDHIST METAPHYSICS This book provides a philosophical account of the major doctrinal shift in the history of early Theravada tradition in India: the transition from the earliest stratum of Buddhist thought to the systematic and allegedly scholastic philosophy of the Pali Abhidhamma movement. Conceptual investigation into the development of Buddhist ideas is pursued, thus rendering the Buddha’s philosophical position more explicit and showing how and why his successors changed it. Entwining comparative philosophy and Buddhology, the author probes the Abhidhamma’s shift from an epistemologically oriented conceptual scheme to a metaphysical worldview that is based on the concept of dhamma. She does so in terms of the Aristotelian tradition and vis-à-vis modern philosophy, exploiting Western philo- sophical literature from Plato to contemporary texts in the fields of philosophy of mind and cultural criticism. This book not only demonstrates that a philosophical inquiry into the conceptual foundations of early Buddhism can enhance our understanding of what philosophy and religion are qua thought and religion; it also shows the value of fresh perspectives for traditional Buddhology. Combining philosophically rigorous investigation and Buddhological research criteria, Early Buddhist Metaphysics fills a significant gap in Buddhist scholar- ship’s treatment of the conceptual development of the Abhidhamma. Noa Ronkin received her PhD from the University of Oxford. She is currently a lecturer in the Introduction to the Humanities Programme and a Research Fellow at the Center for Buddhist Studies, Stanford University. Her research interests include a range of issues associated with Indian Theravada Buddhist philosophy and psychology, the Abhidhamma tradition and comparative Indian philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sects & Sectarianism
    Sects & Sectarianism Also by Bhikkhu Sujato through Santipada A History of Mindfulness How tranquillity worsted insight in the Pali canon Beginnings There comes a time when the world ends… Bhikkhuni Vinaya Studies Research & reflections on monastic discipline for Buddhist nuns A Swift Pair of Messengers Calm and insight in the Buddha’s words Dreams of Bhaddā Sex. Murder. Betrayal. Enlightenment. The story of a Buddhist nun. White Bones Red Rot Black Snakes A Buddhist mythology of the feminine SANTIPADA is a non-profit Buddhist publisher. These and many other works are available in a variety of paper and digital formats. http://santipada.org Sects & Sectarianism The origins of Buddhist schools BHIKKHU SUJATO SANTIPADA SANTIPADA Buddhism as if life matters Originally published by The Corporate Body of the Buddha Education Foundation, Taiwan, 2007. This revised edition published in 2012 by Santipada. Copyright © Bhikkhu Sujato 2007, 2012. Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 2.5 Australia You are free to Share​—​to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the follow- ing conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. With the understanding that: Waiver​—​Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Other Rights​—​In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license: o Your fair dealing or fair use rights; o The author’s moral rights; o Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights.
    [Show full text]
  • (Kamma) in Theravada Buddhism
    1 AN ANALYTICAL STYDY OF ACTION (KAMMA) IN THERAVADA BUDDHISM KULA VATI A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for Degree of Master of Arts (Buddhist Studies) Graduate School Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University C.E . 201 7 2 AN ANALYTICAL STYDY OF ACTION (KAMMA) IN THERAVADA BUDDHISM KULA VATI A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for Degree of Master of Arts (Buddhist Studies) Graduate School Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University C.E. 201 7 (Copyright of Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University) ii Thesis Title : An Analytical Study of Action (Kamma) in Theravāda Buddhism Researcher : Kula Vati Degree : Master of Arts (Buddhist Studies) Thesis Supervisory Committee : Asst. Prof. Lt. Dr. Banjob Bannaruji, Pāli IX, B.Ed. (Education), M.A. (Pali & Sanskrit), Ph.D. (Buddhist Studies) : Asst. Prof. Dr. Sanu Mahatthanadull B.A. (Advertising), M.A. (Buddhist Studies), Ph.D. (Buddhist Studies) Date of Graduation : March 15, 2018 Abstract This Qualitative research has three objectives, namely: (1) to Study Concept and the Origin of Kamma in Theravāda Buddhism (2) to Study Practical of Kamma in Theravāda Buddhism (3) to Analyze Kamma in Theravāda Buddhism and Apply Kamma result in Daily Life. Kamma means intentional body, verbal and mental action. In the ultimate sense, Kamma means volition. If the volition is good, Kamma is good; and If the volition is bad, Kamma is bad. Kamma is a law of nature and is not controlled by any being. There is no involvement of self, soul, God, or Creator in this phenomenon. Each one is the architect of his own fate and destiny. The past actions influence the present, and the past and the present actions influence the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhism from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
    Buddhism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A statue of Gautama Buddha in Bodhgaya, India. Bodhgaya is traditionally considered the place of his awakening[1] Part of a series on Buddhism Outline · Portal History Timeline · Councils Gautama Buddha Disciples Later Buddhists Dharma or Concepts Four Noble Truths Dependent Origination Impermanence Suffering · Middle Way Non-self · Emptiness Five Aggregates Karma · Rebirth Samsara · Cosmology Practices Three Jewels Precepts · Perfections Meditation · Wisdom Noble Eightfold Path Wings to Awakening Monasticism · Laity Nirvāṇa Four Stages · Arhat Buddha · Bodhisattva Schools · Canons Theravāda · Pali Mahāyāna · Chinese Vajrayāna · Tibetan Countries and Regions Related topics Comparative studies Cultural elements Criticism v • d • e Buddhism (Pali/Sanskrit: बौद धमर Buddh Dharma) is a religion and philosophy encompassing a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices, largely based on teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, commonly known as the Buddha (Pāli/Sanskrit "the awakened one"). The Buddha lived and taught in the northeastern Indian subcontinent some time between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE.[2] He is recognized by adherents as an awakened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end suffering (or dukkha), achieve nirvana, and escape what is seen as a cycle of suffering and rebirth. Two major branches of Buddhism are recognized: Theravada ("The School of the Elders") and Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle"). Theravada—the oldest surviving branch—has a widespread following in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, and Mahayana is found throughout East Asia and includes the traditions of Pure Land, Zen, Nichiren Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Shingon, Tendai and Shinnyo-en. In some classifications Vajrayana, a subcategory of Mahayana, is recognized as a third branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Sects and Sectarianism: the Origins of Buddhist Schools
    Sects & Sectarianism The origins of Buddhist schools Bhikkhu Sujato 2006 This work is copyright©2006BhikkhuSujato.All rights reserved. Permission to reprintmay be obtained on application to the author. Available for free download online at http://sectsandsectarianism.googlepages.com Available for purchase from www.lulu.com. This isat COST PRICE ONLY. Neither the author nor Lulu receives any royalties for purchases. This book must not be sold for profit. Santi ForestMonastery http://santifm1.0.googlepages.com The Sangha of bhikkhus and bhikkhunis has been made unified. As long as my children and grandchildren shall live, and as long as the sun and the moon shall shine, any bhikkhu or bhikkhuni who divides the Sangha shall be made to wear white clothes and dwell outside the monasteries. What it is my wish? That the unity of the Sangha should last a long time. King Aśoka, Minor Pillar Edict, Sāñchī Contents Foreword 1 Abstract 2 1. The ‘Unity Edicts’ 4 2. TheSaintsofVedisa 15 3. The Dīpavaṁsa 24 4. Monster or Saint? 41 5. ThreeSins&FiveTheses 54 6. More on the Vibhajjavādins 79 7. Vibhajjavāda vs. Sarvāstivāda? 89 8. Dharmagupta:TheGreekMissions 98 9. The Mūlasarvāstivādins of Mathura 113 Conclusion 122 Appendix: Chronology 125 Bibliography 128 Mahāsaṅghika Śāriputraparipṛcchā Theravāda Dīpavaṁsa The Mahāsaṅghika school diligently study the collected Suttas and teach the true meaning, because they are the source and the center. They wear These 17 sects are schismatic, yellow robes. only one sect is non-schismatic. The Dharmaguptaka school master With the non-schismatic sect, the flavor ofthe true way.Theyare there areeighteen in all.
    [Show full text]
  • Aghoreshwar Bhagawan Ram and the Aghor Tradition
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Anthropology - Dissertations Affairs 12-2011 Aghoreshwar Bhagawan Ram and the Aghor Tradition Jishnu Shankar Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/ant_etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Shankar, Jishnu, "Aghoreshwar Bhagawan Ram and the Aghor Tradition" (2011). Anthropology - Dissertations. 93. https://surface.syr.edu/ant_etd/93 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Aghoreshwar Mahaprabhu Baba Bhagawan Ram Ji, a well-established saint of the holy city of Varanasi in north India, initiated many changes into the erstwhile Aghor tradition of ascetics in India. This tradition is regarded as an ancient system of spiritual or mystical knowledge by its practitioners and at least some of the practices followed in this tradition can certainly be traced back at least to the time of the Buddha. Over the course of the centuries practitioners of this tradition have interacted with groups of other mystical traditions, exchanging ideas and practices so that both parties in the exchange appear to have been influenced by the other. Naturally, such an interaction between groups can lead to difficulty in determining a clear course of development of the tradition. In this dissertation I bring together micro-history, hagiography, folklore, religious and comparative studies together in an attempt to understand how this modern day religious-spiritual tradition has been shaped by the past and the role religion has to play in modern life, if only with reference to a single case study.
    [Show full text]
  • Chris Wallis
    Chris Wallis An Overview of Key Concepts of ‘Theravaada’ Buddhism No doer is there does the deed Nor is there one who experiences its result; Constituent parts alone roll on; Only this view is orthodox. And thus the deed, and thus the result Roll on and on, each from its cause; As of the round of tree and seed, No one can tell when they began. — Visuddhimagga This paper will attempt an overview of the key concepts of the early phase of Buddhism, generally called ‘Theravāda’ (‘the way of the elders’) but also referred to as ‘Nikāya’1 or ‘Hinayāna’ (‘the lesser vehicle’, as it was called by the second phase of Buddhism, the Mahāyāna [‘great vehicle’]). This multiplicity of names is due to the fact that the earliest phase had no distinct name for itself, there being no other kind of Buddhism for it to distinguish itself from. It generally referred to its own doctrine simply as the śāsana or teaching. (Gombrich) Scholars most commonly use the term Theravāda, which is problematic due to the fact that that term also refers to a narrower subset of early Buddhism, that of Śrī Laṅka.2 Enumerating these three referents is a foreshadowing of the rest of the paper: one way to approach an understanding of the basic tenets of Buddhism is through its lists. Thus we shall enumerate further sets of fours, fives, eight, threes, and twelve. The Four Noble Truths Any discussion of early Buddhism necessarily begins with the doctrinal cornerstone of all Buddhism, the Four Noble (ārya) Truths. The First Noble Truth is that 1 E.g., by John Strong.
    [Show full text]