DOCSLIB.ORG

Providing Means Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Providing Means Of P P ERS ROVI P ECTIVES D PROVIDING ING ON THE D THE EFENSE MEANS OF WAR M A CQUISITION E A NS , 1945–2000 , OF W A R PERSPECTIVES ON DEFENSE ACQUISITION U.S. Army 1945–2000 Center of Military History and Industrial College of the Armed Edited by Forces PIN : 081039–000 Shannon A. Brown Providing the Means of War Historical Perspectives on Defense Acquisition, 1945–2000 Shannon A. Brown General Editor UNITED STATES ARMY CENTER OF MILITARY HISTORY AND INDUSTRIAL COLLEGE OF THE ARMED FORCES WASHINGTON, D.C., 2005 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Providing the means of war : historical perspectives on defense acquisition, 1945– 2000 / Shannon A. Brown, general editor. p. cm. 1. United States—Armed Forces—Procurement—History—20th century— Congresses. I. Brown, Shannon A. II. Title. UC263.P79 2005 355.6’212’097309045—dc22 2005042041 First Printing—CMH Pub 70–87–1 Foreword Acquisition as defined by the Department of Defense denotes our national security establishment harnessing the scientific and engineer- ing knowledge of military and civilian professionals to create the tools of modern war. It encompasses research and development, engineering, con- tracting, test and evaluation, fielding, and disposal of weapon systems and other forms of technology that are vital to the nation. The acquisition pro- cess includes resource-management and strategic decisions that determine the new forms of technology that are developed. The Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF)—which is cel- ebrating its eightieth anniversary in 2004—is dedicated to supporting the study of national security decision-making and understanding the vital defense acquisition process that supports it. The U.S. Army Center of Military History (CMH) is committed to having the study of the past inform the decisions of the future. This book, a product of both institu- tions, is an important contribution to understanding the complex relation- ships that characterize the defense acquisition process central to our shared missions and goals. These pages highlight the papers and presentations from the defense acquisition symposium, Providing the Means of War. Held on 10–12 September 2001, the symposium was organized by CMH historians with the assistance of the ICAF faculty. During the second day of the confer- ence, the connections between national security strategy and resource management became the subject of even more reflective discussion as the tragedies of 11 September unfolded. Since the watershed events of that day, the U.S. armed forces have been battling terrorism around the globe and are in the throes of an institutional transformation to meet twenty-first century challenges. The history of acquisition—and the acquisition com- munity—can teach us much about institutional changes, the American response to global threats, and how resources can be best applied to address them. The motto of the Industrial College of the Armed Forces is Industria et Defensio Inseparabiles (“Industry and Defense Are Inseparable”). True to this spirit, the contributions in this volume show that the acquisition process is a shared burden, with both private industry and the American government having important roles to play. We trust that these papers will iii enhance our awareness of this process and of the inseparable partnerships that continue to provide our men and women in uniform with the most modern and capable means of war. Washington, D.C. 15 March 2005 FRANCES C. WILSON JOHN S. BROWN Major General, USMC Brigadier General, USA (Ret.) Commandant Chief of Military History Industrial College of the Armed Forces Preface This book, Providing the Means of War: Historical Perspectives on Defense Acquisition, 1945–2000, is based on the papers presented at an Acquisition History Symposium that took place on 10–12 September 2001. While acquisition is always a critical and timely subject, this con- ference gained special meaning because of the dates on which it was held. On the second day of the conference, two planes slammed into the World Trade Center in New York, a third smashed into the Pentagon in Washington, and a fourth crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. For those who might be tempted to think of the symposium as an academic exer- cise, the events that took place on 11 September serve as a reminder that the outcomes of the defense acquisition process have sweeping strategic consequences. For good or ill, our country and the men and women in the armed forces depend on the products and services obtained through this process for the defense of the nation. While acquisition is frequently a contentious process, at once political, technical, and managerial, the chap- ters presented here illustrate both the remarkable achievements of the sys- tem and the ongoing struggle to transform to support the changing needs of the military. As a nation, we have experienced remarkable changes in technology, doctrine, and capabilities during the fifty-five years following World War II. The security environment of the first years of the twenty- first century calls for continuing, indeed, increased flexibility, speed, and the capacity to change. The Department of Defense (DoD) is facilitating an understanding of the past through the Acquisition History Project. This symposium repre- sented the first major product of that ongoing project. The defense com- munity, we hope, will build on the experiences of others, for the benefit of those who depend on the capabilities developed by the DoD and its indus- trial partners. The Defense Acquisition History Project is one way for the acquisition community to learn about the past and illuminate our under- standing of contemporary and future issues. The project is truly a joint effort, looking back at case histories from the Army, Navy, and Air Force, as well as from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). Creating and nurturing joint endeavors often takes vision and per- sistence. This Acquisition History Project owes its existence to the late Dr. James H. Edgar. It was his vision, creativity, and persistence that pulled the services and OSD together to sponsor this important effort. The acquisition community lost a valued member and a dear friend with Jim’s untimely passing not long after this symposium. A long-time acquisi- tion professional and a Senior Executive in the Department of the Army, Dr. Edgar is represented in this volume by his article, “The Origins and Impact of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act.” It is fitting that Dr. Edgar’s chapter deals with the acquisition workforce. Not only was he instrumental in the crafting of this legislation during his time on Capitol Hill, but he also cared deeply for the acquisition workforce and always strove to advance the capabilities of that workforce so that it might better serve the nation’s needs. He was always interested in education and training for the workforce, and he personally loved learning. It was in the convergence of his love of learning and the needs of the workforce that this project began, and it is only fitting that this first volume be dedicated to Dr. Edgar. He touched many lives in many ways, and this project is only one of his many concrete works by which he will be remembered. Shortly after 11 September, our nation engaged in military action in Afghanistan. Our men and women brought with them their skill and determination, plus the strategies and the military capabilities developed by the Department of Defense and the industrial base that supports it. The national security community demonstrated remarkable flexibility and ability. History teaches us that we have many names for our continu- ous efforts to maximize and make effective our DoD processes. Whether called revolution, reform, transformation, or any other name, what we do to maximize the effectiveness of defense acquisition really matters. In the memory of visionaries like Dr. Jim Edgar, and to those who depend on the fruits of our work, we look back at history, to learn better how to approach the future. September 2003 LINDA S. BRANDT Industrial College of the Armed Forces vi Contents Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 1 INTRODUCTION Shannon A. Brown................................ 5 DEFENSE ACQUISITION HISTORY SYMPOSIUM KEYNOTE ADDRESS J. Ronald Fox .................................... 19 PART I: INTO THE COLD WAR INTO THE COLD WAR: AN OVERVIEW OF ACQUISITION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 1945–1958 Elliott V. Converse III ............................. 27 SOSUS, THE NAVY, AND BELL LABS Gary E. Weir .................................... 47 WEAPONS, “WEAK” STATES, AND THE MILITARY CONTRACT SYSTEM: THE CASE OF RAND AND THE AIR FORCE, 1945–1950 Martin J. Collins.................................. 61 PART II: THE MCNAMARA LEGACY ACQUISITION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 1959–1968: THE MCNAMARA LEGACY Walter S. Poole................................... 79 BUILDING MISSILES: CONCURRENCY AND THE LEGACY OF THE EARLY AIR FORCE ICBM PROGRAM John Lonnquest .................................. 97 SEEDS OF A REVOLUTION: MARITIME UAVS IN THE 1960S Thomas P. Ehrhard................................ 111 vii PART III: RETRENCHMENT AND REFORM DEFENSE ACQUISITION IN THE 1970S: RETRENCHMENT AND REFORM Shannon A. Brown with Walton S. Moody . 141 MONEY, MANAGEMENT, AND MANPOWER: IMPORTANT VARIABLES IN THE DESIGN AND ACQUISITION OF OLIVER HAZARD PERRY-CLASS FRIGATES Timothy L. Francis................................ 169 MOVING TARGET: THE u .s . ARMY INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE PROGRAM IN THE 1970S W. Blair Haworth, Jr. .............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air & Space Power Journal, September-October 2012, Volume
    September–October 2012 Volume 26, No. 5 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Driving towards Success in the Air Force Cyber Mission ❙ 4 Leveraging Our Heritage to Shape Our Future Lt Gen David S. Fadok, USAF Dr. Richard A. Raines Features The Air Force’s Individual Mobilization Augmentee Program ❙ 12 Is the Current Organizational Structure Viable? Col Robin G. Sneed, USAFR Lt Col Robert A. Kilmer, PhD, USA, Retired An Evolution in Intelligence Doctrine ❙ 33 The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Mission Type Order Capt Jaylan Michael Haley, USAF Joint Targeting and Air Support in Counterinsurgency ❙ 49 How to Move to Mission Command LTC Paul Darling, Alaska Army National Guard Building Partnership Capacity ❙ 65 Operation Harmattan and Beyond Col James H. Drape, USAF Departments 94 ❙ Ira C. Eaker Award Winners 95 ❙ Views An Airman’s Perspective on Mission Command . 95 Col Dale S. Shoupe, USAF, Retired Seeing It Coming: Revitalizing Future Studies in the US Air Force . 109 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF A Misapplied and Overextended Example: Gen J . N . Mattis’s Criticism of Effects-Based Operations . 118 Maj Dag Henriksen, PhD, Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy, US Air Force Research Institute 132 ❙ Historical Highlights Geopolitics versus Geologistics Lt. Col. Harry A. Sachaklian 146 ❙ Ricochets & Replies 154 ❙ Book Reviews Embry-Riddle at War: Aviation Training during World War II . 154 Stephen G. Craft Reviewer: R. Ray Ortensie A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon . 157 Neil Sheehan Reviewer: Maj Thomas F. Menza, USAF, Retired Khobar Towers: Tragedy and Response . 160 Perry D. Jamieson Reviewer: CAPT Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • How USAF's Missile Program Helped the Nation Off the Pad
    Iii ANNIVERSARY There was no lack of rocketry art when Sputnik jolted the US and the free world. The Army, Navy, and Air Force had all been working with missiles for some years, and many rocket spe- cialists had foreseen the future significance of space. But the national capabilities were splintered. As NASA came into being, with a strong need for large-scale program know-how, it was the Air Force, fresh from its missile management experience, that could offer the most useful aid in getting the space program under way . How USAF's Missile Program Helped the Nation off the Pad BY WILLIAM LEA VITT ASSOCIATE EDITOR, AIR FORCE/SPACE DIGEST "From this effort has emerged not only the major portion of our national missile force but also the prime base of technology and management skill underpinning the total national space effort. Many of our space accomplishments to date—both military and civilian—simply could not have been undertaken successfully with- out the prior experience gained in the Air Force missile development program." —SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE EUGENE M. ZUCKERT T IS a fact, documented in the public prints, Just one aspect of this sizable Air Force role has in congressional reports, and above all, on been the large number of Air Force officers who have launch pads and tracking sites around the served the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- world, that the US Air Force has made mas- tration on direct loan or in supportive Air Force efforts, sive contributions of men, hardware, and since the civilian space agency's establishment in 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • DETERIORATING NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ROADS WOULD GET BOOST UNDER SENATE BILL -- March 12, 1998
    For release: March 12, 1998 Janet Tennyson 202-2 19-386 1 Peter Umhofer 202-208-60 11 DETERIORATING NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ROADS WOULD GET BOOST UNDER SENATE BILL Thousands of miles of crumbling roadways in the National Wildlife Refuge System would receive a boost under a transportation bill passedtoday by the U.S. Senate. The new funding would help remedy the $158 million road maintenance backlog faced by world’s largest network of lands dedicated to wildlife. Under the Federal Land Highways Program of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), the reauthorization bill, S. 1173, provides for $20 million in new funding for wildlife refuge roads each year for the next 5 years. “The Senate’s action recognizes the important role the National Wildlife Refuge System plays in safeguarding America’s magnificent wildlife resources,” said Jamie Rappaport Clark, Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the agency responsible for managing the 92-million-acre National Wildlife Refuge System. “I applaud the Senate’s efforts to addressthe maintenance needs of the National Wildlife Refuge System,” said Director Clark. “I also want to recognize the tremendous leadership of SenatorsJohn Chafee and Max Baucus in making sure the legislation addressedthese needs. Receiving this funding under the Federal Lands Highways Program would help us ensure safe and accessible roads for the 30 million Americans who visit national wildlife refuges each year. It would also allow the Fish and Wildlife Service to target limited resources toward vital wildlife conservation programs on refuges.” (over) AMERICA’S NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES... wherewddkfe comes wzt~~dly! -2- More than 4,200 miles of public roads and 424 bridges are contained in the 5 14 wildlife refuges and 38 wetland management districts making up the National Wildlife Refuge System.
    [Show full text]
  • RC Baja: Drivetrain Nick Paulay [email protected]
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Undergraduate Projects Undergraduate Student Projects Winter 2019 RC Baja: DriveTrain Nick Paulay [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/undergradproj Part of the Mechanical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Paulay, Nick, "RC Baja: DriveTrain" (2019). All Undergraduate Projects. 79. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/undergradproj/79 This Undergraduate Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Student Projects at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Undergraduate Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Central Washington University MET Senior Capstone Projects RC Baja: Drivetrain By Nick Paulay (Partner: Hunter Jacobson-RC Baja Suspension & Steering) 1 Table of Contents Introduction Description Motivation Function Statement Requirements Engineering Merit Scope of Effort Success Criteria Design and Analyses Approach: Proposed Solution Design Description Benchmark Performance Predictions Description of Analyses Scope of Testing and Evaluation Analyses Tolerances, Kinematics, Ergonomics, etc. Technical Risk Analysis Methods and Construction Construction Description Drawing Tree Parts list Manufacturing issues Testing Methods Introduction Method/Approach/Procedure description Deliverables Budget/Schedule/Project Management Proposed Budget Proposed Schedule Project Management Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgements References Appendix A – Analyses Appendix B – Drawings Appendix C – Parts List Appendix D – Budget Appendix E – Schedule Appendix F - Expertise and Resources 2 Appendix G –Testing Data Appendix H – Evaluation Sheet Appendix I – Testing Report Appendix J – Resume 3 Abstract The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) annually hosts an RC Baja challenge, testing a RC car in three events: slalom, acceleration and Baja.
    [Show full text]
  • New Driver's Night Observation Devices
    GROUP DEFENCE DIVISION VEHICLE SYSTEMS 20 October 2020 Key facts New driver's night observation devices: Rheinmetall w Order encompasses to modernize the Bundeswehr's Marder infantry delivery of 173 Spectus II driver’s night vision fighting vehicle device retrofit kits, plus The German Bundeswehr has awarded Rheinmetall a further order for other services modernizing the tried-and-tested Marder infantry fighting vehicle, or IFV. Under w Order worth €24 million; the contract, Rheinmetall Landsysteme will now be supplying the Bundeswehr delivery to take place in with over 170 driver's night observation devices for the Marder fleet. Worth 2021 and 2022 around €24 million (including valued added tax), the order also encompasses w A new chapter in the logistical support, training and other services. Delivery begins at the end of 2021 ongoing success story and is to be complete by the end of 2022. “Extending the service The new driver's night observation device is the Spectus II. It fuses the image life of the Marder from a residual light amplifier camera with one produced by a thermal imaging infantry fighting vehicle" device, improving the driver's ability to see even in conditions of poor visibility. In addition, the system features a rear-view camera. Cooperation partners taking part in the project include Rheinmetall Technical Publications and the Contacts Rheinmetall subsidiary benntec Systemtechnik GmbH. In response to an urgent Oliver Hoffmann operational requirement for the ISAF mission in Afghanistan, Rheinmetall Head of Public previously integrated the Spectus I – the Spectus II’s forerunner – into the Rheinmetall AG Marder 1 A5A1 fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.Qxd
    CHAPTER 6: The NASA Family The melding of all of the NASA centers, contractors, universities, and often strong personalities associated with each of them into the productive and efficient organization necessary to complete NASA’s space missions became both more critical and more difficult as NASA turned its attention from Gemini to Apollo. The approach and style and, indeed, the personality of each NASA center differed sharply. The Manned Spacecraft Center was distinctive among all the rest. Fortune magazine suggested in 1967 that the scale of NASA’s operation required a whole new approach and style of management: “To master such massively complex and expensive problems, the agency has mobilized some 20,000 individual firms, more than 400,000 workers, and 200 colleges and universities in a combine of the most advanced resources of American civilization.” The author referred to some of the eight NASA centers and assorted field installations as “pockets of sovereignty” which exercised an enormous degree of independence and autonomy.1 An enduring part of the management problem throughout the Mercury and Gemini programs that became compounded under Apollo, because of its greater technical challenges, was the diversity and distinctiveness of each of the NASA centers. The diverse cultures and capabilities represented by each of the centers were at once the space program’s greatest resource and its Achilles’ heel. NASA was a hybrid organization. At its heart was Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory established by Congress in 1917 near Hampton, Virginia, and formally dedicated in 1920. It became the Langley Research Center. Langley created the Ames Aeronautical Laboratory at Moffett Field, California, in 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • AFA Aerospace Education Fellows
    Aerospace Education Fellows The Air Force Association proudly names each of individuals and organizations as Aerospace Education Fellows. AFA thanks both the Fellows and their sponsors for their continued support of AFA’s education programs. Doolittle Fellows Outstanding Current Operations (Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (2017), presented by Central Florida Chapter Outstanding Support (Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) 432nd Special Operations Squadron (2017), presented by Central Florida Chapter Groundbreaking Technology (Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) Predator – General Atomics (2017), presented by Central Florida Chapter David A. Dietsch (2016), presented by AFA Board of Directors General Robin Rand (2016), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Lt Gen David A. Deptula (2016), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Technology on the Horizon (Global Precision Attack) Small Diameter Bomb II (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter Technology Today (Global Precision Attack) JDAM TAIL KIT (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter Deployed Personnel (Global Precision Attack) USAF Deployed Airmen (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter Current Operations (Global Precision Attack) 336th Fighter Squadron (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter HQ ACC/A3TW (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Angry Kitten EA Pod Team (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Capt Brad Dvorak (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Alpha-Omega Change Engineering (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter 705th Combat Training Squadron (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Maj Gen Jack Weinstein (2015), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Col Samuel Clinton Hinote (2015), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Jerry White (2015), presented by AFA National Directors Scott Van Cleef (2014), presented by AFA National Directors General Mark A. Welsh III (2014), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Major General Garrett Harencak (2014), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Colonel Robert S.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Conversion: Optimisation of Parameters in the Design Process
    M. Gordić i dr. Prepravak u električno vozilo: optimizacija parametara u procesu konstruiranja ISSN 1330-3651 (Print), ISSN 1848-6339 (Online) https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20160613131757 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CONVERSION: OPTIMISATION OF PARAMETERS IN THE DESIGN PROCESS Mirko Gordić, Dragan Stamenković, Vladimir Popović, Slavko Muždeka, Aleksandar Mićović Preliminary communication One of the directions for making cleaner and more economic vehicles is to adopt electric vehicle concept. The paper shows current design concepts for electric vehicles worldwide, as well as current sources for supplying vehicles with electric energy. It describes a conversion of one vehicle so that it can be powered by electric motor. The results of tractive and dynamic characteristics calculation and vehicle stability simulation, before and after the conversion, are shown. Obtained results and influential factors are analysed so they can be optimised in order to influence the final characteristics of the converted vehicle. The conclusion is that the complete optimisation process should be performed before the beginning of vehicle conversion in order to avoid undesirable effects, i.e. undesirable characteristics of converted vehicle and high conversion costs. Keywords: conversion; electric vehicle; vehicle dynamics Prepravak u električno vozilo: optimizacija parametara u procesu konstruiranja Prethodno priopćenje Jedan od pravaca ka stvaranju čistijih i ekonomičnijih vozila jeste prihvatanje koncepta električnog vozila. Rad predstavlja suvremene koncepte konstrukcije električnih vozila širom svijeta, kao i načine snabdjevanja vozila energijom. Opisan je prepravak vozila kako bi ga se moglo pogoniti elektro- motorom. Prikazani su rezultati vučno-dinamičkog proračuna i simulacije stabilnosti prije i poslije prepravka. Analizirani su dobiveni rezultati i utjecajni čimbenici radi optimiziranja u cilju utjecaja na karakteristike prepravljenog vozila.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century
    US Army TRADOC TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 AA MilitaryMilitary GuideGuide toto TerrorismTerrorism in the Twenty-First Century US Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC G2 TRADOC Intelligence Support Activity - Threats Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 15 August 2007 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 1 Summary of Change U.S. Army TRADOC G2 Handbook No. 1 (Version 5.0) A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century Specifically, this handbook dated 15 August 2007 • Provides an information update since the DCSINT Handbook No. 1, A Military Guide to Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century, publication dated 10 August 2006 (Version 4.0). • References the U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • References the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Reports on Terrorist Incidents - 2006, dated 30 April 2007. • Deletes Appendix A, Terrorist Threat to Combatant Commands. By country assessments are available in U.S. Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Reports on Terrorism 2006 dated April 2007. • Deletes Appendix C, Terrorist Operations and Tactics. These topics are covered in chapter 4 of the 2007 handbook. Emerging patterns and trends are addressed in chapter 5 of the 2007 handbook. • Deletes Appendix F, Weapons of Mass Destruction. See TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.04. • Refers to updated 2007 Supplemental TRADOC G2 Handbook No.1.01, Terror Operations: Case Studies in Terror, dated 25 July 2007. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No. 1.02, Critical Infrastructure Threats and Terrorism, dated 10 August 2006. • Refers to Supplemental DCSINT Handbook No.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-92-91 Strategic Defense Initiative
    I i nitcd Nt,;ttw (it~nc~ral Accwurrl,ing Officy _“.,.,...” ,,. ...II ._ _ -.- --.- .-. -.-..-.-...- --- .---..^._.._._..... -.--.---- ___-_-______ - ----- --.-. STRATEGIC DEFENSE / INITIATIVE Estimates of Brilliant Pebbles’ Effectiveness Are Based on Many Unproven Assumptions II146232 IM -“*“..““.._ .__*l.---.“..-.-_.~-- ~-_-- -. --- __I. -_.-..-..-- ) 1 (;nO/NSIAI)-!)~-Hl I/ _~_. .^........ ._-..-.___- .-__..... -.._. -_. __._.. _ ._ ._-.. ..^. .,._.. _ __....^ . .” . United States General Accounting Offlce GAO Washiugton, D.C. 20648 National Security and International Affairs Division B-223094 March 27,lQQZ The Honorable Sam Ntmn Chairman, Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: This report responds to your request that we review the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization’s analyses of the effectiveness of Brilliant Pebbles, the proposed space-based weapon for the Global Protection Against Limited Strikes (GPALS)Strategic Defense System. The report discusses the role of computer simulations in assessing the effectiveness of the Brilliant Pebbles system. We are sending copies of this report to appropriate congressional committees, the Secretaries of Defense and the Air Force, and the Directors, Strategic Defense Initiative Organization and Office of Management and Budget. We will also make copies available to others, Please contact me at (202) 275-4268 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report. Major contributors are listed in appendix II. Sincerely yours, Nancy R. Kingsbury Director Air Force Issues Executive Summary In January 199 1, the President directed that the Strategic Defense Initiative Purpose (SDI) program be refocused toward providing protection against limited ballistic missile strikes, whether deliberate, accidental, or unauthorized.
    [Show full text]
  • Brilliant Pebbles Program
    OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL BRILLIANT PEBBLES PROGRAM Report No. 94-084 April 14, 1994 Department of Defense Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Reports Distribution Unit, Audit Planning and Technical Support Directorate, at (703) 614-6303 (DSN 224­ 6303) or FAX (703) 614-8542. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or request future audits, contact the Planning and Coordination Branch, Audit Planning and Technical Support Directorate, at (703) 614-1868 (DSN 224-1868) or FAX (703) 614-8542. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: Inspector General, Department of Defense OAIG-AUD (ATTN: APTS Audit Suggestions) 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, Virginia 22202-2884 DoDHotline To report fraud, waste, or abuse, call the DoD Hotline at (800) 424-9098 (DSN 223-5080) or write to the DoD Hotline, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20301-1900. The identity of writers and callers is fully protected. Acronyms BMDO Ballistic Missile Defense Organization GAO General Accounting Office GPALS Global Protection Against Limited Strikes OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense SDIO Strategic Defense Initiative Organization INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NA VY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-2884 Report No. 94-084 April 14, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISffiON AND TECHNOLOGY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) DIRECTOR, BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION SUBJECT: Brilliant Pebbles Program (Project No. 3AS-0077) Introduction We are providing this final memorandum report for your information and use. The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDI0)1 began the Brilliant Pebbles acquisition strategy in June 1990.
    [Show full text]