DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastshore Drive National Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastshore Drive National Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan EASTSHORE DRIVE NATIONAL SCENIC Br,\VAY RURAL SECTION, INCLI0JE VILLAGE TO US 50 CORRlDOR Mi'\NAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by EDAW, Inc. San Francisco, California in association with Leigh, Scott, Cleary, Inc. Tahoe City, California for The City of Carson City in cooperation v.~th Nevada Department of Transportation Tahoe Regional Planning Agency T.EAM. Tahoe August, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARy ............................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ................................... ;, ................. ,................................................ 3 1.2 Corridor Limits ................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Issues within the SR 28 Corridor .... :............... :............................................... 7 1.4 Study Process ................................................................................................... 12 2.0 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................... 15 2.1 SR 28 Corridor Vision Statement... ............................................................... 15 2.2 SR 28 Corridor Goal Statements ................................................................... 15 2.3 SR 28 Corridor Objectives ............................................................................. 17 3.0 SUMMARY OF CORRIDOR RESOURCES ........................................................... 20 3.1 Intrinsic Qnalities Assessment.. ..................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Natural Beauty ..................................................................................... 20 3.1.2 Sand Beaches and Headlands .............................................................. 21 3 .1.3 Upland and Backcountty Areas ........................................................... 21 3.1.4 AicheologicaJ/Historic Features .......................................................... 22 3.2 SR 28 Roadway Characteristics .:·.................................................................. 22 3.2.1 Geometric and Operating Characteristics ............................................ 22 3.2.2 Traffic Volumes ................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Safety Record .................... :.................................................................. 23 3.2.4 Vehicle Barriers ................................................................................... 23 3.3 Land Ownership, Use, Regulation and Management.. ................................ 26 3.3.1 Land Ownership and Management Jurisdiction .................................. 26 3.3.2 Land Use .........................................................................................· ..... 26 3.3.3 Recreational Use Patterns .................................................................... 27 3.3.4 Land Use Regulations .......................................................................... 27 3.3.5 Land Planning and Management ..................................................... , ... 29 State Route 28 Corridor Management Plan Table of Contents ." TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 4.0 ACTIONIIMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM .......................................................... 35 4.1 Organization and Management Plan ............................................................ 35 4.1.1 SR 28 Scenic Byway Oversight Committee ........................................ 35 4.1.2 Ad- hoc Subcommittees ....................................................................... 36 4.2 Public Participation Plan ............................................................................... 36 4.3 Resource Protection, Enhancement, and Development Plan ...................... 36 4.3.1 Scenic Resources ................................................................................. 36 4.3.2 Soil Erosion .......................................................................................... 37 4.3.3 Forest Health ........................................................................................ 38 4.3.4 Facilities and Programs ........................................................................ 38 4.3.5 Land Acquisition .............................. , ................................................... 38 4.4 Commerce Plan ...................................................................... ·......................... 38 4.5 Safety and Transportation Plan .................................................................... 39 4.5.1 Parking and Transit .............................................................................. 39 4.5.2 Safety Record ..................................................................................... ..40 4.5.3 Highway Design and Maintenance ..................................................... .40 4.5.4 Enforcement ........................................................................................ .41 4.6 Visitor Experience and Interpretation Plan ................................................ .42 4.6.1 Public Education/Interpretation .......................................................... .42 4.6.2 Recreation Facilities ........................................................................... .42 I 4.6.3 Signs/Outdoor Advertising ................................................................. .42 I 4.7 FinanciallPartnership Plan ........................................................................... .43 I 4.7.1 Visitor Use Fees .................................................................................. .43 4.7.2 Scenic Byway Program ....................................................................... .43 I 4.7.3 Transportation Enhancement Activities Program (TEA) ................... .43 4.7.4 Hazard Elimination Program ............................................................... 44 4.7.5 Public Lands Highway Program .......................................................... 44 • 4.7.6 Federal Transit Administration. Public Transportation for • Rural Areas (Section 5311) Program ................................................... 44 • 4.7.7 Direct Grants from Governmental Agencies ...................................... .45 • ;I :I :II ~ :a State Route 28 Corridor Management Plan ii Table of Contents ~. =I TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) ~ :;t Tables :;t 3.1 Average Daily Traffic on State Route 28, 1985-1995 ........................................... 24 :;t 3.2 Accidents by Type and Severity, June 1992 through May 1995 ......................... 25 :;t 5.1 Near Term Action Plan ......................................................................................... .48 2 2 5.2 Long Term Action Plan ........................................................................................... 50 31 :I Figures :I 1.1 Regional Setting Map ............................................................................................... 5 I 1.2 Study Area Map ........................................................................................................ 6 I 1.3 Corridor Management Planning Process ............................................................. 14 I I I I I I • • • I • I I I I I State Route 28 Corridor Management Plan Table of Contents I iv I , .', EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1996, the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) designated the major travel route around the east side of Lake Tahoe (from South Stateline to North Stateline) as the East Shore Drive National Scenic Byway, in response to agency and local community nomination efforts. A requirement of designation under the National Scenic Byway Program is the development of a Corridor Management Plan to balance the management and conservation of the byway's intrinsic qualities with the public's use and enjoyment of those qualities, Funds were granted by FHWA to Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) for the preparation of this Corridor Management Plan, focused on the rural portion of the Byway along State Route 28 from Incline Village to Spooner Summit. The Scenic Byway corridor along this portion of SR 28 lies within the jurisdiction of many agencies, including the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), US Forest Service, Nevada Division of Sate Parks, NDOT, Carson City and County, Washoe County, and Douglas County. The primary purpose of the SR 28 Corridor Management Plan (CMP) is to consolidate the relevant portions of these agencies' plans and programs into one document, which provides an overall management framework for protecting the Scenic Byway While maximizing its benefits to visitors and the local community. The purpose of the CMP is also to provide a clear statement of the issues affecting the corridor, to recommend a prioritized set of actions with clear responsibilities for agencies and other groups in resolving issues, and to establish a structure for continued, integrated, and streamlined management of the corridor's intrinsic qualities. Critical resource and land use issues affecting the corridor include: • roadside parking and associated safety problems; • visual impacts of the roadway and opportunities to enhance the visitor experience; • unregulated trail use and soil erosion affecting lake water quality; • high levels of beach use with some conflicts between different user groups; • forest health management requiring salvage logging and ecosystem management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tahoe Rent Methodology Study (Final with Public Comments)
    RENT METHODOLOGY STUDY – LAKE TAHOE Prepared for: California State Lands Commission 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-S Sacramento, CA 95825 February 21, 2020 Ninette Lee, Public Land Manager California State Lands Commission 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-S Sacramento, CA 95825 Re: Lake Tahoe Self-Contained Rent Methodology Study File Name: TDG 2019 048 State of CA Agreement # C2018065 Dear Ms. Lee: Pursuant to your request, I performed an analysis of the benchmark rental rate methodology used by the California State Lands Commission (herein referred to as “Commission” and/or “SLC”) to determine rental rates for over 600 leases in the Lake Tahoe area. These leases include private piers and buoys (Category 1); and upland fill area (Category 2). I have completed the analysis and provided recommendations based on the Scope of Work. I have analyzed market data throughout the State of California in order to prepare the following rent methodology study. This report was prepared for the client, the California State Lands Commission, and authorized representatives, and is intended only for their specified use. The intended use of this appraisal is to assist the Commission in establishing the methodology to determine appropriate rents for those privately-owned piers (berths), buoys, and fill areas on Lake Tahoe. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide recommendations on rent methodology and rates as of July 25, 2019. This rent methodology study was prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (U.S.P.A.P.), and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the Appraisal Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Volume 3 | Number 2
    June 2017 Quarterly Volume 3 | Number 2 The quarterly newsletter of the Incline Village General Improvement District www.yourtahoeplace.com VIEWS Doug Miranda Photography INCLINE VILLAGE INCLINE VILLAGE INCLINE VILLAGE INCLINE VILLAGE PARKS & RECREATION CHAMPIONSHIP GOLF COURSE WEDDINGS & EVENTS MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE 980 Incline Way • 775-832-1300 955 Fairway Blvd • 775-832-1146 955 Fairway Blvd • 775-832-1240 690 Wilson Way • 775-832-1150 Our public Recreation Center A classic 18-hole public Lake Tahoe Create an unforgettable experience Enjoy the great outdoors at this includes an indoor pool, sauna, golf course featuring a Robert Trent for your Lake Tahoe wedding, public 18-hole par-58 course group & water fitness classes, a Jones Sr. design and incredible lake meeting, celebration or golf event. featuring an amazing mountain cardiovascular room, gymnasium, views, the par-72 Championship Our facilities include The Chateau layout and beautiful views. This childcare and a variety of programs Course was listed on the “Best in at Incline Village™, Aspen Grove, course is fun, affordable, and quick and services. State” 2012 - 2015 by Golf Digest The Championship and Mountain to play with special 9-hole and magazine and ranked #5 on Golf Courses, and Diamond Peak Ski twilight rate options. Bring the Tennis Center • 964 Incline Way GolfAdvisor’s 2016 “Top Courses Resort. family out for fun events like Nine 775-832-1235 in Nevada” list. Facilities include & Wine, Sunday Family Fun Days, Eleven courts, eight Pickleball a 23,000 sq. ft. event space, golf The Chateau features a 5,200 sq. ft. and Thrill & Grill.
    [Show full text]
  • Sr 28 Corridor Parking Management Plan
    SR 28 CORRIDOR PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN March 26, 2019 SR 28 Corridor Parking Management Plan Adopted by the Tahoe Transportation District April 12, 2019 Prepared for: Danielle Hughes, Capital Projects Manager Tahoe Transportation District 128 Market St., #3F Stateline, NV 89448 Prepared By: 1221 E. Pike Street, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98122 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW 01 01 Project Context 01 Value Pricing Pilot Program 04 PRINCIPLES, VISION, GOALS, AND STRATEGIES 05 02 Vision 05 Guiding Principles 06 Project Goals 06 Strategies 07 Elements of the Vision 08 EXISTING CONDITIONS 12 03 Prior Planning Efforts 12 SR 28 Existing Conditions Summary 13 PARKING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 19 04 Overview 19 Program Framework 20 Operations and Maintenance 24 Phase 1 (Value Pricing Pilot Program) 27 Implementation and Monitoring 30 Strategies, Timeline, and Responsible Agencies 30 Monitoring Metrics, Indicators and Measures of Success 34 Toolkit of Parking Strategies 37 APPENDIX A - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPENDIX B - PARKING PILOT SCENARIOS, MONITORING, AND METRICS LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Parking Management Plan Project Area 02 Figure 25 Implementation Actions, Agencies and Timeline 31 Figure 2 Plan Organization 04 Figure 26 Parking Metrics 34 Figure 3 Branding Examples 10 Figure 27 Corridor Indicators 35 Figure 4 Park Tahoe Logo Design 10 Figure 28 Toolkit of Parking Strategies Matrix 37 Figure 5 Parking and Transportation Marketing Examples 10 Figure 6 Placemaking Examples at Transportation Facilities 11 Figure 7 Route 28 Corridor Existing Parking Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Tahoe Basin Construction Season
    2016 Tahoe Basin Construction Season 89 2889 28 Where: ED 89 PM 8.6-13.8, 89/50 “Y” to Cascade Road Where: PLA 28 PM 9.3-10.2, Junction of Highway 267 What: Drainage improvements, sidewalks, road to Secline Avenue (Phase 2) and from Secline 1 widening, paving Avenue to Chipmunk Street (completion of When: May - October Up to 20 Minute Delay 9* Phase 1) in Kings Beach What: Streetscape and drainage improvements When: April - June and September - October Up to 20 Where: ED 89 PM 13.8-18.0, Emerald Bay minute delay What: Drainage improvements, paving When: May - October Up to 20 minute delay Note: The highway from postmile 14.7 (just north 2 of Cascade Road) to postmile 16.2 (Inspiration 431 Nevada State Route 431 Point) may be closed for up to two weeks (Monday through Friday) during the off-peak season to accommodate paving operations. Where: Mt. Rose Highway, Washoe MP 0.268 to 0.651 There will be a window of 4-8 p.m. when it would 10 What: Truck escape ramp be open each day during the closure. When: May - September Up to 20 minute delay Where: ED 89 PM 24.9-27.2 Meeks Creek to Wilson Avenue in Tahoma 3 What: Drainage improvements, paving 28 Nevada State Route 28 When: March - May Up to 10 minute delay Where: SR 28 from US 50 to Incline Village, Douglas Where: PLA 89 PM 2.2-3.1, Fawn Street to Cherry Street 0.00 TO 1.23, Carson 0.00 to 3.95 and Washoe in Homewood 4* 11 MP 0.00 to 6.00 What: Multi-use path, connecting to existing path What: Safety enhancements, water quality When: May - August Up to 5 minute delay improvements, and initial
    [Show full text]
  • The Regular Meeting of the Incline Village General Improvement District Will Be Held Starting at 3:00 P.M. on Wednesday, Februar
    The regular meeting of the Incline Village General Improvement District will be held starting at 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 12, 2014 in the Chateau at 955 Fairway Boulevard, Incline Village, Nevada. A. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE* B. ROLL CALL OF THE IVGID BOARD OF TRUSTEES* C. PUBLIC COMMENTS* (During the Public Comment section of the agenda, the public may comment on any subject pertaining to Incline Village General Improvement District, that is in Reports and/or on the Consent Calendar and/or is not on the agenda for action. Comments from the public, relating to a General Business agenda item, will be taken during the Board's consideration of that item. When recognized by the Chair, speakers are requested to come to the podium at the front of the room, state their name and address, and direct their comments to the Chair. All speakers are made aware that their comments will be included in the minutes of the meeting. Speaking time is limited to three minutes and yielding of time is prohibited. Persons are invited to submit comments in writing on the agenda items and/or attend and make comment. The Chair may or may not provide a response or may take the comment under advisement. The Board of Trustees conducts the business of Incline Village and Crystal Bay and its citizens during its meetings. The Chair may order the removal of any person whose conduct disrupts the orderly, efficient or safe conduct of the meeting. Warnings against disruptive behavior may or may not be given prior to removal.
    [Show full text]
  • K" Srarn Rnponr DA T/ BOARD MEETING DATE: August 25,2015 Riskmgt
    WASHOE COUNTY "Dedicated To Excellence in Public Seruice" www.washoecounty.us ffi CI\,OACM Finance K" Srarn Rnponr DA t/ BOARD MEETING DATE: August 25,2015 RiskMgt. € HR N/A Comptroller fYls DATE: July 6,2015 TO: Board of County Commissioners f,.ROM: Cheryl Surface, Park Planner, Planning and Development Community Services Department, 328-2039, csurface@,washoecounty.us THROUGH: William H. Whitney, Division Director, Planning and Development Community S ervices Department, 328 -3 617, bwhitney@washo ecounty.us SUBJECT: Approve the SR 28 Conidor Operations and Maintenance Interlocal Agreement between Washoe County, Tahoe Transportation District, Nevada Department of Transportation, Nevada Division of State Parks, Nevada Division of State Lands, Nevada Department of Public Safety- Highway Patrol, Incline Village General Improvement District, Carson City Parks & Recreation Department, Douglas County Parks & Recreation Department and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, retroactive to August 1,2015. (Commission District l.) SUMMARY This Interlocal agreement recognizes the need to combine the operations and maintenance of facilities and services within the Nevada State Route 28 (SR 28) conidor, including the Lake Tahoe bike path and parking facilities, in order to effectively and efficiently manage across jurisdictional boundaries. This agreement identifies the duties and responsibilities of each agency partner, for maintenance and operations, establishes a Corridor Management Team (CMT) and provides for conflict resolution, should any occur. The goal of this agreement is to provide a collaborative approach to planning, constructing, operating and maintaining facilities and services within the SR 28 corridor. The CMT will work to: a. Fulfill the operations and maintenance responsibilities set forth in this Agreement; b.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 28 Corridor Operations and Maintenance Interlocal Agreement
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 10FF4F4E-1DA2-4A4B-846D-78E1DDDBDDBD SR 28 Corridor Operations and Maintenance Interlocal Agreement Tahoe Transportation District and Nevada Department of Transportation and Nevada Division of State Parks and Nevada Division of State Lands and Nevada Department of Public Safety-Highway Patrol and Washoe County Community Services Department and Incline Village General Improvement District and Carson City Parks & Recreation Department and Douglas County Parks & Recreation Department and Tahoe Regional Planning Agency This Interlocal Agreement (this “Agreement”) is dated and effective August 1, 2015, by and between the Tahoe Transportation District (“TTD”); the Nevada Department of Transportation (“NDOT”); the Nevada Division of State Parks (“NDSP”); the Nevada Division of State Lands (“NDSL”); the Nevada Department of Public Safety-Highway Patrol (“NHP”); Washoe County and its Community Services Department (“Washoe County”); the Incline Village General Improvement District (“IVGID”); Carson City and its Parks & Recreation Department (“Carson City”); the Douglas County and its Parks & Recreation Department (“Douglas County”); and the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”). Collectively, these agencies and organizations will hereinafter be referred to as the “Parties.” WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Parties are public agencies under Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) 277.100 and authorized to enter into cooperative agreement in accordance with NRS 277.080 to 277.110; WHEREAS, NRS 277.180 authorizes any one or more public agencies to contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the agreement is authorized by law to perform; WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the need to combine the operations and maintenance approach for projects in the SR 28 corridor: the SR 28 Corridor Project, the NV Stateline to EXHIBIT C-1 - TAHOE -1- Document consists of 17 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet Are Press Clippings from January 13, 2020 Through February 9, 2021
    D TRUCKEE MEADOWS WATER AUTHORITY Board of Directors AGENDA Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Virtual meeting only. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ATTEND VIA THE WEB LINK, OR TELPHONICALLY BY CALLING THE NUMBER, LISTED BELOW. NO PHYSICAL LOCATION IS BEING PROVIDED FOR THIS MEETING (be sure to keep your phones or microphones on mute, and do not place the call on hold) Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://tmwa.zoom.us/j/93199705901?pwd=b1BNd2hHM2pqVkVhZFlCcGgzV1NkUT09 Password: 205040 Or call: Phone: (888) 788-0099 Webinar ID: 931 9970 5901 Board Members Chair Vaughn Hartung Vice Chair Kristopher Dahir Member Neoma Jardon Member Alexis Hill Member Jenny Brekhus Member Naomi Duerr Member Paul Anderson NOTES: 1. This meeting is being conducted pursuant to the Governor’s Declaration of Emergency Directive 006 (“Directive 006 http://gov.nv.gov/News/Emergency_Orders/2020/2020-03-22_-_COVID-19_Declaration_of_Emergency_Directive_006/. and will be held by teleconference only. 2. The announcement of this meeting has been electronically posted in compliance with NRS 241.020(3) and Directive 006 at http://www.tmwa.com, and NRS 232.2175 at https://notice.nv.gov/. 3. Pursuant to Directive 006, the requirement contained in NRS 241.020(3)(c) that physical locations be available for the public to receive supporting material for public meetings has been suspended. Staff reports and supporting material for the meeting are available on the TMWA website at http://www.tmwa.com/meeting/ or you can contact Sonia Folsom at (775) 834- 8002. Supporting material is made available to the general public in accordance with NRS 241.020(6).
    [Show full text]
  • Tahoe Transportation District (Ttd)
    TAHOE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (TTD) BUDGET FINANCE COMMITTEE Meeting Agenda Tahoe Regional Planning Agency September 13, 2019 128 Market Street 9:00 a.m. Stateline, NV All items on this agenda are action items unless otherwise noted. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order. The Committee may combine two or more items for consideration. The Committee may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. I. PUBLIC INTEREST COMMENTS All comments are to be limited to no more than five minutes per person. Comments made cannot be acted upon or discussed at this meeting, but may be placed on a future agenda for consideration. II. NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF FINANCE COMMITTEE CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR III. RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 9, 2019 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS (All Items for Possible Recommendation) Page A. Adopt Resolutions 2019-011 and 2019-012 Authorizing the District 44 Manager to Execute Revised Claims for the California Transportation Development Act Funds for the El Dorado County Portion of Lake Tahoe, Including the City of South Lake Tahoe for Transit Operations for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 (Item VII.B.) B. Authorize the Issuance of a Request for Qualifications for the Procurement 48 of an Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Contract(s) for Professional Public Outreach Consulting Services for the Capital Improvement Program and Projects, Transit Services, and Related Programs (Item VII.C.) C. Authorize the Procurement for Professional Consulting Services to Develop 81 a Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan (Item VIII.F) V.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 FTIP Meets All Applicable Transportation Planning Requirements Per Title 23 CFR Part 450; And
    Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization Federal Transportation Improvement Program 2015 - 2018 2015 September 24, 2014 Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Prepared by Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization PO Box 5310 128 Market Street Stateline, NV 89449 Contact: Judy Weber, Associate Transportation Planner II Phone: 775.589.5203, Email: [email protected] www.tahoempo.org Subject Transportation Program of Projects October 2014 through September 2018 Approved by Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization Governing Board September 24, 2014 Abstract The 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program for the Lake Tahoe Basin is a four-year program consisting of projects for highway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects. The projects are recommended for various stages of development during the program period. The project listings include the location and description of proposed work, the project cost, the anticipated funding sources, and the scheduled year of work. Local Use Guidelines State and federal regulations mandate the development of the Federal Transportation Improvement Program. Local agencies and transportation operators must have their major projects approved in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program to qualify for most categories of state and federal transportation funding. TAHOE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TMPO RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - 06 ADOPTION OF THE 2015-2018 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE LAKE TAHOE REGION WHEREAS, The Tahoe Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]