Lecture 7 - Magnetohydrodynamics II O Topics in Today’S Lecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lecture 7 - Magnetohydrodynamics II O Topics in Today’S Lecture Lecture 7 - Magnetohydrodynamics II o Topics in today’s lecture: o Equation of Motion o Lorentz Forces o Magnetic Pressure and Tension o MHD Equilibria Lecture 7 - MHD II Magnetic Forces dv o First consider, momentum equation: " = #$p + "g dt o Moving plasma will experience the Lorentz force (j!B) => dv ! " = #$p + j% B + "g dt o How do we interpret the Lorentz Force? Using Ampere’s Law: 1 j" B = # B " ($ " B) ! µ0 $ 1 ' but using the vector identity "& B# B) = B * (" * B) + (B# ")B % 2 ( 1 & B2 ) ! => j" B = (B# $)B % $( + µ0 ' 2µ0 * ! o 1st term is magnetic tension parallel to B - important for curved fields. 2nd term is magnetic pressure - important when |B| changes along field. ! ! Lecture 7 - MHD II Magnetic Pressure and Tension o Lorentz force can be resolved into two components: 2 o Pressure term (B /2µ0): Isotropic. Gradient of a scalar. Perpendicular to B in example. o Tension term (B/µ0) : Directed towards centre of curvature of B. e.g., B' has larger radius of curvature than B, therefore larger restoring force due to tension. o Magnetic pressure and tension represent two kinds of B' restoring forces => associated with distinct wave modes: Alfven waves and magnetoacoustic waves. B Lecture 7 - MHD II MHD Equation of Motion o Motion in of plasma can be described by: dv " = # $p + j % B + "g dt (1) (2) (3) (4) o In corona, term (3) dominates. o Along B, j || B => (3) = 0, so (2) and (4) important. (2) p / L = 0 0 >> 1 for (4) "0 g p0 p0 L0 =><< L0H<<= = H H = Scale height "0g"0 g i.e., for length-scales smalled than the scale height. Lecture 7 - MHD II ! ! ! MHD Equation of Motion o L0 < H => p ~ costant. o L0 > H => p falls o Pressure gradient (!p) - acts from high to low p. o Is normal to isobars. Pressure isobars Lecture 7 - MHD II MHD Equation of Motion dv " = # $p + j% B + " g dt (1) (2) (3) (4) (2) p (i) = ! = (3) B2 / (2µ) o W hen ! <<1, j " B dominates. Condition applies in corona. B (ii) (1) ! (3) " v ! vA = µ# o Perturbations or waves propagate at a a characteristic velocity, called the Alfven speed. Lecture 7 - MHD II ! Typical values on Sun Photosphere Chromosphere Corona N (m-3) 1023 1020 1015 T (K) 6000 104 106 B (G) 5 - 103 100 10 " 106 - 1 10-1 10-3 3 vA (km/s) 0.05 - 10 10 10 o 1 Tesla = 104 Gauss (G) -21 2 9 1/2 o " = 3.5 x 10 N T/B , vA = 2 x 10 B/N Lecture 7 - MHD II MHD Equation of Motion - Equilibria dv " = # $p + j% B + " g dt (1) (2) (3) (4) o If v << vA, then (1) << (3) and so 0 = " #p + j $ B + % g, o Called equation of magnetohydrostatic equilibrium. o where Note: j = "# B / µ, ".B = 0, $ = p / (R T) Lecture 7 - MHD II ! ! ! MHD Equation of Motion - Equilibria 0 = " #p + j $ B + % g (2) (3) (4) o If Lo << H, then (4) << (2) and 0 = " #p + j $ B o Called equation of magnetostatic equilibrium. o If Lo << 2H/", then (4) << (3) and 0 = j " B o Called force-free configuration. ! Lecture 7 - MHD II Potential fields o A simple solution to the force-free equation is j = 0, which is called a potental field configuration. o From Ampere’s Law, " ! B = 0 which has a general solution B = "#, where # is the scalar magnetic potential. o Substituting the general solution into the solenoid condition ("#B=0) gives, 2 = 0 ! " # =># o Potential fields therefore satisfy Laplace’s equation. General solution can be given in terms of associated Legendre polynomials. Lecture 7 - MHD II ! ! Force-free fields o Assume that L0<< H and "<<1, we have the force-free field equation. If the magnetic field is not potential then the general solution is that the current must be parallel to the magnetic field. Thus, µj $ B or µj = $B where % is a scalar function of position (i.e., $ = $(r) ) o From Ampere’s Law => "!B = $B o Now since "#B=0 and "#("!B) =0, we obtain "#("!B) = "#($B) = $"#B + B#"$ o Hence, B#"$ = 0 o So that $ is constant along each field line, although it may vary from field line to field line. If $ = 0, then the magnetic field reduces to the potential case. Lecture 7 - MHD II MHD Equation of Motion - Equilibria o If $ = const, then "!B = $B => "!("!B) = "!($B) = $"!B = $2B o However, "!"!B = "("#B) - "2B and so, "2B + $2B = 0 o Which is the Helmholtz Equation. A field that fulfils this condition is force-free. When boundary conditions specified, can then use standard mathematical methods to solve. o E.g., consider a coronal arcade with an arc (e.g, sinusoidal) in the xz plane and uniform in y. Also require field to vanish in at high altitude (e.g., exponential). Lecture 7 - MHD II Linear force-free model o Now from , o Therefore, where l2 = k2 - $2. o The projection of the field lines onto the xy-plane are parallel straight lines: whereas the projection onto the xz-plane are arcs (see figure above). Lecture 7 - MHD II.
Recommended publications
  • Particle Motion
    Physics of fusion power Lecture 5: particle motion Gyro motion The Lorentz force leads to a gyration of the particles around the magnetic field We will write the motion as The Lorentz force leads to a gyration of the charged particles Parallel and rapid gyro-motion around the field line Typical values For 10 keV and B = 5T. The Larmor radius of the Deuterium ions is around 4 mm for the electrons around 0.07 mm Note that the alpha particles have an energy of 3.5 MeV and consequently a Larmor radius of 5.4 cm Typical values of the cyclotron frequency are 80 MHz for Hydrogen and 130 GHz for the electrons Often the frequency is much larger than that of the physics processes of interest. One can average over time One can not however neglect the finite Larmor radius since it lead to specific effects (although it is small) Additional Force F Consider now a finite additional force F For the parallel motion this leads to a trivial acceleration Perpendicular motion: The equation above is a linear ordinary differential equation for the velocity. The gyro-motion is the homogeneous solution. The inhomogeneous solution Drift velocity Inhomogeneous solution Solution of the equation Physical picture of the drift The force accelerates the particle leading to a higher velocity The higher velocity however means a larger Larmor radius The circular orbit no longer closes on itself A drift results. Physics picture behind the drift velocity FxB Electric field Using the formula And the force due to the electric field One directly obtains the so-called ExB velocity Note this drift is independent of the charge as well as the mass of the particles Electric field that depends on time If the electric field depends on time, an additional drift appears Polarization drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Fields
    Chapter 3 Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Fields 3.1 Maxwell Displacement Current In the early 1860s (during the American civil war!) electricity including induction was well established experimentally. A big row was going on about theory. The warring camps were divided into the • Action-at-a-distance advocates and the • Field-theory advocates. James Clerk Maxwell was firmly in the field-theory camp. He invented mechanical analogies for the behavior of the fields locally in space and how the electric and magnetic influences were carried through space by invisible circulating cogs. Being a consumate mathematician he also formulated differential equations to describe the fields. In modern notation, they would (in 1860) have read: ρ �.E = Coulomb’s Law �0 ∂B � ∧ E = − Faraday’s Law (3.1) ∂t �.B = 0 � ∧ B = µ0j Ampere’s Law. (Quasi-static) Maxwell’s stroke of genius was to realize that this set of equations is inconsistent with charge conservation. In particular it is the quasi-static form of Ampere’s law that has a problem. Taking its divergence µ0�.j = �. (� ∧ B) = 0 (3.2) (because divergence of a curl is zero). This is fine for a static situation, but can’t work for a time-varying one. Conservation of charge in time-dependent case is ∂ρ �.j = − not zero. (3.3) ∂t 55 The problem can be fixed by adding an extra term to Ampere’s law because � � ∂ρ ∂ ∂E �.j + = �.j + �0�.E = �. j + �0 (3.4) ∂t ∂t ∂t Therefore Ampere’s law is consistent with charge conservation only if it is really to be written with the quantity (j + �0∂E/∂t) replacing j.
    [Show full text]
  • 19-8 Magnetic Field from Loops and Coils
    Answer to Essential Question 19.7: To get a net magnetic field of zero, the two fields must point in opposite directions. This happens only along the straight line that passes through the wires, in between the wires. The current in wire 1 is three times larger than that in wire 2, so the point where the net magnetic field is zero is three times farther from wire 1 than from wire 2. This point is 30 cm to the right of wire 1 and 10 cm to the left of wire 2. 19-8 Magnetic Field from Loops and Coils The Magnetic Field from a Current Loop Let’s take a straight current-carrying wire and bend it into a complete circle. As shown in Figure 19.27, the field lines pass through the loop in one direction and wrap around outside the loop so the lines are continuous. The field is strongest near the wire. For a loop of radius R and current I, the magnetic field in the exact center of the loop has a magnitude of . (Equation 19.11: The magnetic field at the center of a current loop) The direction of the loop’s magnetic field can be found by the same right-hand rule we used for the long straight wire. Point the thumb of your right hand in the direction of the current flow along a particular segment of the loop. When you curl your fingers, they curl the way the magnetic field lines curl near that segment. The roles of the fingers and thumb can be reversed: if you curl the fingers on Figure 19.27: (a) A side view of the magnetic field your right hand in the way the current goes around from a current loop.
    [Show full text]
  • This Chapter Deals with Conservation of Energy, Momentum and Angular Momentum in Electromagnetic Systems
    This chapter deals with conservation of energy, momentum and angular momentum in electromagnetic systems. The basic idea is to use Maxwell’s Eqn. to write the charge and currents entirely in terms of the E and B-fields. For example, the current density can be written in terms of the curl of B and the Maxwell Displacement current or the rate of change of the E-field. We could then write the power density which is E dot J entirely in terms of fields and their time derivatives. We begin with a discussion of Poynting’s Theorem which describes the flow of power out of an electromagnetic system using this approach. We turn next to a discussion of the Maxwell stress tensor which is an elegant way of computing electromagnetic forces. For example, we write the charge density which is part of the electrostatic force density (rho times E) in terms of the divergence of the E-field. The magnetic forces involve current densities which can be written as the fields as just described to complete the electromagnetic force description. Since the force is the rate of change of momentum, the Maxwell stress tensor naturally leads to a discussion of electromagnetic momentum density which is similar in spirit to our previous discussion of electromagnetic energy density. In particular, we find that electromagnetic fields contain an angular momentum which accounts for the angular momentum achieved by charge distributions due to the EMF from collapsing magnetic fields according to Faraday’s law. This clears up a mystery from Physics 435. We will frequently re-visit this chapter since it develops many of our crucial tools we need in electrodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetohydrodynamics 1 19.1Overview
    Contents 19 Magnetohydrodynamics 1 19.1Overview...................................... 1 19.2 BasicEquationsofMHD . 2 19.2.1 Maxwell’s Equations in the MHD Approximation . ..... 4 19.2.2 Momentum and Energy Conservation . .. 8 19.2.3 BoundaryConditions. 10 19.2.4 Magneticfieldandvorticity . .. 12 19.3 MagnetostaticEquilibria . ..... 13 19.3.1 Controlled thermonuclear fusion . ..... 13 19.3.2 Z-Pinch .................................. 15 19.3.3 Θ-Pinch .................................. 17 19.3.4 Tokamak.................................. 17 19.4 HydromagneticFlows. .. 18 19.5 Stability of Hydromagnetic Equilibria . ......... 22 19.5.1 LinearPerturbationTheory . .. 22 19.5.2 Z-Pinch: Sausage and Kink Instabilities . ...... 25 19.5.3 EnergyPrinciple ............................. 28 19.6 Dynamos and Reconnection of Magnetic Field Lines . ......... 29 19.6.1 Cowling’stheorem ............................ 30 19.6.2 Kinematicdynamos............................ 30 19.6.3 MagneticReconnection. 31 19.7 Magnetosonic Waves and the Scattering of Cosmic Rays . ......... 33 19.7.1 CosmicRays ............................... 33 19.7.2 Magnetosonic Dispersion Relation . ..... 34 19.7.3 ScatteringofCosmicRays . 36 0 Chapter 19 Magnetohydrodynamics Version 1219.1.K.pdf, 7 September 2012 Please send comments, suggestions, and errata via email to [email protected] or on paper to Kip Thorne, 350-17 Caltech, Pasadena CA 91125 Box 19.1 Reader’s Guide This chapter relies heavily on Chap. 13 and somewhat on the treatment of vorticity • transport in Sec. 14.2 Part VI, Plasma Physics (Chaps. 20-23) relies heavily on this chapter. • 19.1 Overview In preceding chapters, we have described the consequences of incorporating viscosity and thermal conductivity into the description of a fluid. We now turn to our final embellishment of fluid mechanics, in which the fluid is electrically conducting and moves in a magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Inductance
    Chapter 11 Inductance and Magnetic Energy 11.1 Mutual Inductance ............................................................................................ 11-3 Example 11.1 Mutual Inductance of Two Concentric Coplanar Loops ............... 11-5 11.2 Self-Inductance ................................................................................................. 11-5 Example 11.2 Self-Inductance of a Solenoid........................................................ 11-6 Example 11.3 Self-Inductance of a Toroid........................................................... 11-7 Example 11.4 Mutual Inductance of a Coil Wrapped Around a Solenoid ........... 11-8 11.3 Energy Stored in Magnetic Fields .................................................................. 11-10 Example 11.5 Energy Stored in a Solenoid ........................................................ 11-11 Animation 11.1: Creating and Destroying Magnetic Energy............................ 11-12 Animation 11.2: Magnets and Conducting Rings ............................................. 11-13 11.4 RL Circuits ...................................................................................................... 11-15 11.4.1 Self-Inductance and the Modified Kirchhoff's Loop Rule....................... 11-15 11.4.2 Rising Current.......................................................................................... 11-18 11.4.3 Decaying Current..................................................................................... 11-20 11.5 LC Oscillations ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Principle and Characteristic of Lorentz Force Propeller
    J. Electromagnetic Analysis & Applications, 2009, 1: 229-235 229 doi:10.4236/jemaa.2009.14034 Published Online December 2009 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jemaa) Principle and Characteristic of Lorentz Force Propeller Jing ZHU Northwest Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China. Email: [email protected] Received August 4th, 2009; revised September 1st, 2009; accepted September 9th, 2009. ABSTRACT This paper analyzes two methods that a magnetic field can be generated, and classifies them under two types: 1) Self-field: a magnetic field can be generated by electrically charged particles move, and its characteristic is that it can’t be independent of the electrically charged particles. 2) Radiation field: a magnetic field can be generated by electric field change, and its characteristic is that it independently exists. Lorentz Force Propeller (ab. LFP) utilize the charac- teristic that radiation magnetic field independently exists. The carrier of the moving electrically charged particles and the device generating the changing electric field are fixed together to form a system. When the moving electrically charged particles under the action of the Lorentz force in the radiation magnetic field, the system achieves propulsion. Same as rocket engine, the LFP achieves propulsion in vacuum. LFP can generate propulsive force only by electric energy and no propellant is required. The main disadvantage of LFP is that the ratio of propulsive force to weight is small. Keywords: Electric Field, Magnetic Field, Self-Field, Radiation Field, the Lorentz Force 1. Introduction also due to the changes in observation angle.) “If the electric quantity carried by the particles is certain, the The magnetic field generated by a changing electric field magnetic field generated by the particles is entirely de- is a kind of radiation field and it independently exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 4: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), MHD Equilibrium, MHD Waves
    HSE | Valery Nakariakov | Solar Physics 1 Lecture 4: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), MHD Equilibrium, MHD Waves MHD describes large scale, slow dynamics of plasmas. More specifically, we can apply MHD when 1. Characteristic time ion gyroperiod and mean free path time, 2. Characteristic scale ion gyroradius and mean free path length, 3. Plasma velocities are not relativistic. In MHD, the plasma is considered as an electrically conducting fluid. Gov- erning equations are equations of fluid dynamics and Maxwell's equations. A self-consistent set of MHD equations connects the plasma mass density ρ, the plasma velocity V, the thermodynamic (also called gas or kinetic) pressure P and the magnetic field B. In strict derivation of MHD, one should neglect the motion of electrons and consider only heavy ions. The 1-st equation is mass continuity @ρ + r(ρV) = 0; (1) @t and it states that matter is neither created or destroyed. The 2-nd is the equation of motion of an element of the fluid, "@V # ρ + (Vr)V = −∇P + j × B; (2) @t also called the Euler equation. The vector j is the electric current density which can be expressed through the magnetic field B. Mind that on the lefthand side it is the total derivative, d=dt. The 3-rd equation is the energy equation, which in the simplest adiabatic case has the form d P ! = 0; (3) dt ργ where γ is the ratio of specific heats Cp=CV , and is normally taken as 5/3. The temperature T of the plasma can be determined from the density ρ and the thermodynamic pressure P , using the state equation (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 31295005665780.Pdf
    DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A THREE HUNDRED kA BREECH SIMULATION RAILGUN by BRETT D. SMITH, B.S. in M.E. A THESIS IN -ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Jtpproved Accepted December, 1989 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Magne Kristiansen for serving as the advisor for my grad­ uate work as well as serving as chairman of my thesis committee. I am also appreciative of the excellent working environment provided by Dr. Kristiansen at the laboratory. I would also like to thank my other two thesis committee members, Dr. Lynn Hatfield and Dr. Edgar O'Hair, for their advice on this thesis. I would like to thank Greg Engel for his help and advice in the design and construc­ tion of the experiment. I am grateful to Lonnie Stephenson for his advice and hard work in the construction of the experiment. I would also like to thank Danny Garcia, Mark Crawford, Ellis Loree, Diana Loree, and Dan Reynolds for their help in various aspects of this work. I owe my deepest appreciation to my parents for their constant support and encour­ agement. The engineering advice obtained from my father proved to be invaluable. 11 CONTENTS .. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 11 ABSTRACT lV LIST OF FIGURES v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. THEORY OF RAILGUN OPERATION 4 III. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF MAX II 27 Railgun System Design 28 Electrical Design and Construction 42 Mechanical Design and Construction 59 Diagnostics Design and Construction 75 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Main Magnetic Force Computation Methods for Noise and Vibration Assessment in Electrical Machines
    JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, SEPTEMBER 2017 1 Comparison of main magnetic force computation methods for noise and vibration assessment in electrical machines Raphael¨ PILE13, Emile DEVILLERS23, Jean LE BESNERAIS3 1 Universite´ de Toulouse, UPS, INSA, INP, ISAE, UT1, UTM, LAAS, ITAV, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France 2 L2EP, Ecole Centrale de Lille, Villeneuve d’Ascq 59651, France 3 EOMYS ENGINEERING, Lille-Hellemmes 59260, France (www.eomys.com) In the vibro-acoustic analysis of electrical machines, the Maxwell Tensor in the air-gap is widely used to compute the magnetic forces applying on the stator. In this paper, the Maxwell magnetic forces experienced by each tooth are compared with different calculation methods such as the Virtual Work Principle based nodal forces (VWP) or the Maxwell Tensor magnetic pressure (MT) following the stator surface. Moreover, the paper focuses on a Surface Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (SPMSM). Firstly, the magnetic saturation in iron cores is neglected (linear B-H curve). The saturation effect will be considered in a second part. Homogeneous media are considered and all simulations are performed in 2D. The technique of equivalent force per tooth is justified by finding similar resultant force harmonics between VWP and MT in the linear case for the particular topology of this paper. The link between slot’s magnetic flux and tangential force harmonics is also highlighted. The results of the saturated case are provided at the end of the paper. Index Terms—Electromagnetic forces, Maxwell Tensor, Virtual Work Principle, Electrical Machines. I. INTRODUCTION TABLE I MAGNETO-MECHANICAL COUPLING AMONG SOFTWARE FOR N electrical machines, the study of noise and vibrations due VIBRO-ACOUSTIC I to magnetic forces first requires the accurate calculation of EM Soft Struct.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 2102 Lecture 2
    Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling PPhhyyssicicss 22110022 LLeeccttuurree 22 Charles-Augustin de Coulomb EElleeccttrriicc FFiieellddss (1736-1806) January 17, 07 Version: 1/17/07 WWhhaatt aarree wwee ggooiinngg ttoo lleeaarrnn?? AA rrooaadd mmaapp • Electric charge Electric force on other electric charges Electric field, and electric potential • Moving electric charges : current • Electronic circuit components: batteries, resistors, capacitors • Electric currents Magnetic field Magnetic force on moving charges • Time-varying magnetic field Electric Field • More circuit components: inductors. • Electromagnetic waves light waves • Geometrical Optics (light rays). • Physical optics (light waves) CoulombCoulomb’’ss lawlaw +q1 F12 F21 !q2 r12 For charges in a k | q || q | VACUUM | F | 1 2 12 = 2 2 N m r k = 8.99 !109 12 C 2 Often, we write k as: 2 1 !12 C k = with #0 = 8.85"10 2 4$#0 N m EEleleccttrricic FFieieldldss • Electric field E at some point in space is defined as the force experienced by an imaginary point charge of +1 C, divided by Electric field of a point charge 1 C. • Note that E is a VECTOR. +1 C • Since E is the force per unit q charge, it is measured in units of E N/C. • We measure the electric field R using very small “test charges”, and dividing the measured force k | q | by the magnitude of the charge. | E |= R2 SSuuppeerrppoossititioionn • Question: How do we figure out the field due to several point charges? • Answer: consider one charge at a time, calculate the field (a vector!) produced by each charge, and then add all the vectors! (“superposition”) • Useful to look out for SYMMETRY to simplify calculations! Example Total electric field +q -2q • 4 charges are placed at the corners of a square as shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Polywell – a Path to Electrostatic Fusion
    Polywell – A Path to Electrostatic Fusion Jaeyoung Park Energy Matter Conversion Corporation (EMC2) University of Wisconsin, October 1, 2014 1 Fusion vs. Solar Power For a 50 cm radius spherical IEC device - Area projection: πr2 = 7850 cm2 à 160 watt for same size solar panel Pfusion =17.6MeV × ∫ < συ >×(nDnT )dV For D-T: 160 Watt à 5.7x1013 n/s -16 3 <συ>max ~ 8x10 cm /s 11 -3 à <ne>~ 7x10 cm Debye length ~ 0.22 cm (at 60 keV) Radius/λD ~ 220 In comparison, 60 kV well over 50 cm 7 -3 (ne-ni) ~ 4x10 cm 2 200 W/m : available solar panel capacity 0D Analysis - No ion convergence case 2 Outline • Polywell Fusion: - Electrostatic Fusion + Magnetic Confinement • Lessons from WB-8 experiments • Recent Confinement Experiments at EMC2 • Future Work and Summary 3 Electrostatic Fusion Fusor polarity Contributions from Farnsworth, Hirsch, Elmore, Tuck, Watson and others Operating principles (virtual cathode type ) • e-beam (and/or grid) accelerates electrons into center • Injected electrons form a potential well • Potential well accelerates/confines ions Virtual cathode • Energetic ions generate fusion near the center polarity Attributes • No ion grid loss • Good ion confinement & ion acceleration • But loss of high energy electrons is too large 4 Polywell Fusion Combines two good ideas in fusion research: Bussard (1985) a) Electrostatic fusion: High energy electron beams form a potential well, which accelerates and confines ions b) High β magnetic cusp: High energy electron confinement in high β cusp: Bussard termed this as “wiffle-ball” (WB). + + + e- e- e- Potential Well: ion heating &confinement Polyhedral coil cusp: electron confinement 5 Wiffle-Ball (WB) vs.
    [Show full text]