CD4 T Cell Autophagy Is Integral to Memory Maintenance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Costimulation of T-Cell Activation and Virus Production by B7 Antigen on Activated CD4+ T Cells from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Donors OMAR K
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 11094-11098, December 1993 Immunology Costimulation of T-cell activation and virus production by B7 antigen on activated CD4+ T cells from human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected donors OMAR K. HAFFAR, MOLLY D. SMITHGALL, JEFFREY BRADSHAW, BILL BRADY, NITIN K. DAMLE*, AND PETER S. LINSLEY Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98121 Communicated by Leon E. Rosenberg, August 3, 1993 (receivedfor review April 29, 1993) ABSTRACT Infection with the human immunodeficiency sequence (CTLA-4) (34), a protein structurally related to virus type 1 (HIV-1) requires T-cefl activation. Recent studies CD28 but only expressed on T cells after activation (12). have shown that interactions of the T-lymphocyte receptors CTLA-4 acts cooperatively with CD28 to bind B7 and deliver CD28 and CTLA-4 with their counter receptor, B7, on antigen- T-cell costimulatory signals (13). presenting cells are required for optimal T-cell activation. Here Because of the importance of the CD28/CTLA-4 and B7 we show that HIV-1 infection is associated with decreased interactions in immune responses, it is likely that these expression of CD28 and increased expression of B7 on CD4+ interactions are also important during HIV-1 infection. Stud- T-cell lines generated from seropositive donors by afloantigen ies with anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) suggested stimulation. Loss of CD28 expression was not seen on CD4+ a role for CD28 in up-regulating HIV-1 long terminal repeat- T-ceU lines from seronegative donors, but up-regulation of B7 driven transcription of a reporter gene in leukemic cell lines expression was observed upon more prolonged culture. -
Human and Mouse CD Marker Handbook Human and Mouse CD Marker Key Markers - Human Key Markers - Mouse
Welcome to More Choice CD Marker Handbook For more information, please visit: Human bdbiosciences.com/eu/go/humancdmarkers Mouse bdbiosciences.com/eu/go/mousecdmarkers Human and Mouse CD Marker Handbook Human and Mouse CD Marker Key Markers - Human Key Markers - Mouse CD3 CD3 CD (cluster of differentiation) molecules are cell surface markers T Cell CD4 CD4 useful for the identification and characterization of leukocytes. The CD CD8 CD8 nomenclature was developed and is maintained through the HLDA (Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens) workshop started in 1982. CD45R/B220 CD19 CD19 The goal is to provide standardization of monoclonal antibodies to B Cell CD20 CD22 (B cell activation marker) human antigens across laboratories. To characterize or “workshop” the antibodies, multiple laboratories carry out blind analyses of antibodies. These results independently validate antibody specificity. CD11c CD11c Dendritic Cell CD123 CD123 While the CD nomenclature has been developed for use with human antigens, it is applied to corresponding mouse antigens as well as antigens from other species. However, the mouse and other species NK Cell CD56 CD335 (NKp46) antibodies are not tested by HLDA. Human CD markers were reviewed by the HLDA. New CD markers Stem Cell/ CD34 CD34 were established at the HLDA9 meeting held in Barcelona in 2010. For Precursor hematopoetic stem cell only hematopoetic stem cell only additional information and CD markers please visit www.hcdm.org. Macrophage/ CD14 CD11b/ Mac-1 Monocyte CD33 Ly-71 (F4/80) CD66b Granulocyte CD66b Gr-1/Ly6G Ly6C CD41 CD41 CD61 (Integrin b3) CD61 Platelet CD9 CD62 CD62P (activated platelets) CD235a CD235a Erythrocyte Ter-119 CD146 MECA-32 CD106 CD146 Endothelial Cell CD31 CD62E (activated endothelial cells) Epithelial Cell CD236 CD326 (EPCAM1) For Research Use Only. -
T-Cell Antigen CD28 Mediates Adhesion with B Cells by Interacting with Activation Antigen B7/BB-1 PETER S
Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 5031-5035, July 1990 Immunology T-cell antigen CD28 mediates adhesion with B cells by interacting with activation antigen B7/BB-1 PETER S. LINSLEY*, EDWARD A. CLARKt, AND JEFFREY A. LEDBETTER* *Oncogen, 3005 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121; and tDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Communicated by Seymour J. Klebanoff, March 30, 1990 ABSTRACT Studies using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) intercellular adhesion mediated by major histocompatibility have implicated the homodimeric glycoprotein CD28 as an complex (MHC) class I (13) and class II (14) molecules with important regulator of human T-cell activation, in part by the CD8 and CD4 accessory molecules, respectively. We posttranscriptional control ofcytokine mRNA levels. Although have expressed the CD28 antigen to high levels in Chinese the CD28 antigen has functional and structural characteristics hamster ovary (CHO) cells and have used these transfected of a receptor, a natural ligand for this molecule has not been cells to develop a CD28-mediated cell adhesion assay. By identified. Here we show that the CD28 antigen, expressed in using this assay as a screening method, we have demon- Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, mediated specific inter- strated an interaction between CD28 and a natural ligand cellular adhesion with human lymphoblastoid and leukemic expressed on activated B lymphocytes, the B7/BB-1 antigen. B-cell lines and with activated primary murine B cells. CD28- mediated adhesion was not, dependant upon divalent cations. Several mAbs were identified that inhibited CD28-mediated MATERIALS AND METHODS adhesion, including mAb BB-1 against the B-cell activation mAbs. -
Effector CD4 T-Cell Transition to Memory Requires Late Cognate Interactions That Induce Autocrine IL-2
ARTICLE Received 3 Jun 2014 | Accepted 24 Sep 2014 | Published 5 Nov 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6377 Effector CD4 T-cell transition to memory requires late cognate interactions that induce autocrine IL-2 K. Kai McKinstry1,*, Tara M. Strutt1,*, Bianca Bautista1, Wenliang Zhang1, Yi Kuang1, Andrea M. Cooper2 & Susan L. Swain1 It is unclear how CD4 T-cell memory formation is regulated following pathogen challenge, and when critical mechanisms act to determine effector T-cell fate. Here, we report that following influenza infection most effectors require signals from major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and CD70 during a late window well after initial priming to become memory. During this timeframe, effector cells must produce IL-2 or be exposed to high levels of paracrine or exogenously added IL-2 to survive an otherwise rapid default contraction phase. Late IL-2 promotes survival through acute downregulation of apoptotic pathways in effector T cells and by permanently upregulating their IL-7 receptor expression, enabling IL-7 to sustain them as memory T cells. This new paradigm defines a late checkpoint during the effector phase at which cognate interactions direct CD4 T-cell memory generation. 1 Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA. 2 Trudeau Institute, 154 Algonquin Avenue, Saranac Lake, New York 12983, USA. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.K.M. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5377 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6377 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. -
Signaling Expression by IL-7 and TCR Α Receptor Differential Regulation
Differential Regulation of Human IL-7 Receptor α Expression by IL-7 and TCR Signaling This information is current as Nuno L. Alves, Ester M. M. van Leeuwen, Ingrid A. M. of September 24, 2021. Derks and René A. W. van Lier J Immunol 2008; 180:5201-5210; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5201 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/180/8/5201 Downloaded from References This article cites 36 articles, 19 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/180/8/5201.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 24, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2008 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Differential Regulation of Human IL-7 Receptor ␣ Expression by IL-7 and TCR Signaling1 Nuno L. Alves,2* Ester M. M. van Leeuwen,3*† Ingrid A. M. Derks,* and Rene´A. -
CD40-Deficient Mice GEORG A
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 4994-4998, May 1996 Immunology Induction of alloantigen-specific tolerance by B cells from CD40-deficient mice GEORG A. HOLLXNDER*t, EMANUELA CASTIGLIt, ROBERT KULBACKI§, MICHAEL SU*, STEVEN J. BURAKOFF*, JOSEI-CARLOS GUTIERREZ-RAMOS§, AND RAIF S. GEHAt *Division of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Pediatrics, tDivision of Immunology, The Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, §Center for Blood Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 Communicated by Frederick W Alt, The Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, January 22, 1996 (received for review November 17, 1995) ABSTRACT Interaction between CD40 on B cells and The capacity of B cells to provide ligands for T-cell specific CD40 ligand molecules on T cells is pivotal for the generation costimulatory molecules determines the outcome of T-cell of a thymus-dependent antibody response. Here we show that activation. Resting B cells express only limited amounts of B cells deficient in CD40 expression are unable to elicit the costimulatory molecules compared to activated B cells (11) proliferation of allogeneic T cells in vitro. More importantly, and are thus ineffective as antigen presenting cells (12). This mice immunized with CD40-1- B cells become tolerant to concept has also been demonstrated in vivo. For instance, allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens monovalent rabbit anti-mouse IgD when presented by small as measured by a mixed lymphocyte reaction and cytotoxic resting B cells rendered mice tolerant to rabbit Ig (13). T-cell assay. The failure of CD40-'- B cells to serve as antigen Polyclonal activation of antigen presenting B cells (e.g., by presenting cells in vitro was corrected by the addition of crosslinking with divalent rabbit anti-mouse IgD) prevented anti-CD28 mAb. -
Memory T Cells + Maintenance of CD8 the Dual Role of IL-2 in the Generation
The Dual Role of IL-2 in the Generation and Maintenance of CD8 + Memory T Cells Zhenhua Dai, Bogumila T. Konieczny and Fadi G. Lakkis This information is current as J Immunol 2000; 165:3031-3036; ; of September 30, 2021. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.3031 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/165/6/3031 Downloaded from References This article cites 31 articles, 17 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/165/6/3031.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on September 30, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Dual Role of IL-2 in the Generation and Maintenance of CD8؉ Memory T Cells1 Zhenhua Dai, Bogumila T. Konieczny, and Fadi G. Lakkis2 The mechanisms responsible for the generation and maintenance of T cell memory are unclear. In this study, we tested the role of IL-2 in allospecific CD8؉ T cell memory by analyzing the long-term survival, phenotype, and functional characteristics of IL-2-replete (IL-2؉/؉) and IL-2-deficient (IL-2؊/؊) CD8؉ TCR-transgenic lymphocytes in an adoptive transfer model. -
The Immunological Synapse and CD28-CD80 Interactions Shannon K
© 2001 Nature Publishing Group http://immunol.nature.com ARTICLES The immunological synapse and CD28-CD80 interactions Shannon K. Bromley1,Andrea Iaboni2, Simon J. Davis2,Adrian Whitty3, Jonathan M. Green4, Andrey S. Shaw1,ArthurWeiss5 and Michael L. Dustin5,6 Published online: 19 November 2001, DOI: 10.1038/ni737 According to the two-signal model of T cell activation, costimulatory molecules augment T cell receptor (TCR) signaling, whereas adhesion molecules enhance TCR–MHC-peptide recognition.The structure and binding properties of CD28 imply that it may perform both functions, blurring the distinction between adhesion and costimulatory molecules. Our results show that CD28 on naïve T cells does not support adhesion and has little or no capacity for directly enhancing TCR–MHC- peptide interactions. Instead of being dependent on costimulatory signaling, we propose that a key function of the immunological synapse is to generate a cellular microenvironment that favors the interactions of potent secondary signaling molecules, such as CD28. The T cell receptor (TCR) interaction with complexes of peptide and as CD2 and CD48, which suggests that CD28 might have a dual role as major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) is central to the T cell an adhesion and a signaling molecule4. Coengagement of CD28 with response. However, efficient T cell activation also requires the partici- the TCR has a number of effects on T cell activation; these include pation of additional cell-surface receptors that engage nonpolymorphic increasing sensitivity to TCR stimulation and increasing the survival of ligands on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Some of these molecules T cells after stimulation5. CD80-transfected APCs have been used to are involved in the “physical embrace” between T cells and APCs and assess the temporal relationship of TCR and CD28 signaling, as initiat- are characterized as adhesion molecules. -
CD20-Positive Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Report of a Case After Nodular Sclerosis Hodgkin’S Disease and Review of the Literature Renee L
CD20-Positive Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Report of a Case after Nodular Sclerosis Hodgkin’s Disease and Review of the Literature Renee L. Mohrmann, M.D., Daniel A. Arber, M.D. Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California CASE REPORT We present a case of peripheral T-cell lymphoma co-expressing CD3 and CD20, as well as demon- A 47-year-old man presented in 1993 with a brief strating T-cell receptor gene rearrangement, in a history of right axillary lymph node enlargement patient who had been diagnosed with nodular scle- and mild fatigue. Biopsy showed nodular sclerosis rosis Hodgkin’s disease 5 years previously. Although Hodgkin’s disease. He was treated with six courses 15 cases of CD20-positive T-cell neoplasms have of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, been previously reported in the literature, this is the prednisone/doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine first report of CD20-positive T-cell lymphoma oc- chemotherapy over a period of 6 months. Clinical curring subsequent to treatment of Hodgkin’s dis- remission was achieved for 5 years. In early 1998, the patient noticed enlargement of lymph nodes in ease. The current case affords an opportunity to the posterior cervical region, which were followed review the rarely reported expression of CD20 in clinically for several months. Weight loss of 15 lbs., T-cell neoplasms as well as the relationship between fatigue, and flu-like symptoms ensued. The lymph Hodgkin’s disease and subsequently occurring non- nodes became firmer to palpation and were biop- Hodgkin’s lymphomas. In addition, the identifica- sied, showing peripheral T-cell lymphoma, diffuse tion of this case supports the suggestion that the use large-cell type. -
Development of Canine Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Treatment & Translation
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Development Of Canine Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy For Treatment & Translation Mohammed Kazim Panjwani University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Allergy and Immunology Commons, Immunology and Infectious Disease Commons, Medical Immunology Commons, and the Oncology Commons Recommended Citation Panjwani, Mohammed Kazim, "Development Of Canine Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy For Treatment & Translation" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2513. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2513 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2513 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Development Of Canine Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy For Treatment & Translation Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has had remarkable success targeting B cell leukemias in human patients, but unexpected toxicities and failures in other disease demonstrate the need for more predictive pre-clinical animal models than the murine ones currently used. Dogs develop spontaneous malignancies similar to humans in their tissues of origin, gene expression profiles, treatments, and disease courses, and have long been used as models for immunotherapy. I hypothesize that the development of CAR T cell therapy for dogs with spontaneous disease and that the -
Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist
2 Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex chal- non–antigen-specifc responses possibly leading to allergy, lenge. Currently available vaccines have largely been devel- autoimmunity, or even premature death—are being raised. oped empirically, with little or no understanding of how they Certain “off-targets effects” of vaccines have also been recog- activate the immune system. Their early protective effcacy is nized and call for studies to quantify their impact and identify primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specifc anti- the mechanisms at play. The objective of this chapter is to bodies (Box 2.1). However, there is more to antibody- extract from the complex and rapidly evolving feld of immu- mediated protection than the peak of vaccine-induced nology the main concepts that are useful to better address antibody titers. The quality of such antibodies (e.g., their these important questions. avidity, specifcity, or neutralizing capacity) has been identi- fed as a determining factor in effcacy. Long-term protection HOW DO VACCINES MEDIATE PROTECTION? requires the persistence of vaccine antibodies above protective thresholds and/or the maintenance of immune memory cells Vaccines protect by inducing effector mechanisms (cells or capable of rapid and effective reactivation with subsequent molecules) capable of rapidly controlling replicating patho- microbial exposure. The determinants of immune memory gens or inactivating their toxic components. Vaccine-induced induction, as well as the relative contribution of persisting immune effectors (Table 2.1) are essentially antibodies— antibodies and of immune memory to protection against spe- produced by B lymphocytes—capable of binding specifcally cifc diseases, are essential parameters of long-term vaccine to a toxin or a pathogen.2 Other potential effectors are cyto- effcacy. -
And CD28 (T P44) Induces Autocrine Interleukin 2/Interleukin 2 Receptor-Mediated Cell Proliferation
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central A NOVEL ACTIVATION PATHWAY FOR MATURE THYMOCYTES Costimulation of CD2 (T,p50) and CD28 (T p44) Induces Autocrine Interleukin 2/Interleukin 2 Receptor-mediated Cell Proliferation By SOO YOUNG YANG, STEPHEN M. DENNING,' SHINICHI MIZUNO, BO DUPONT, AND BARTON F. HAYNES* From the Laboratories of Human and Biochemical Immunogenetics, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York 10021; and the "Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710 Bone marrrow-derived T progenitor cells undergo proliferation and maturation under the influence of the thymic microenvironment (1). Only a small fraction of thymocytes are selected to account for self tolerance, as well as self restriction, and become immunocompetent T cells (2). The molecular and cellular mechanisms for the growth and maturation of thymocytes are poorly understood. Cell surface phenotype analyses have shown that thymocytes are composed ofhighly heterogeneous populations. Based on cell surface expression of the TCR accessory molecules CD4 and CD8, thymocytes can be divided into three major subpopula- tions, which generally are thought to relate to maturation stages. They are the CD2+CD1 - CD4- 8- (double-negative) cells, CD2'CD1'CD4'8' (double-positive) cells, and CD2' CDl - CD4' 8- or CD2' CDl - CD4- 8' (single-positive) mature thymocytes. Both double-negative and double-positive thymocytes are immature cells located in the cortical compartment of human thymus (3). Mature thymocytes do not express the cortical specific marker CD1 but express TCRA and B chain subunits associated with the CD3 complex and reside predominantly in the medullary com- partment (4) .