Conservation Assessment for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region: a Binational Collaborative Approach to Conservation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Assessment for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region: a Binational Collaborative Approach to Conservation Commission for Environmental Cooperation Please cite as: CEC. 2014. Conservation Assessment for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region: A Binational Collaborative Approach to Conservation. Montreal, QC: Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 106 pp. This document was drafted by the CEC Secretariat, members of the Big Bend- Río Bravo Steering Committee, and other experts. The information contained herein does not represent the views of the CEC, or the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of America. Reproduction of this document whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes may be made without special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. Except where otherwise noted, this work is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial-No Derivative Works License. © Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-89700-030-1 Disponible en español – ISBN: 978-2-89700-031-8 Disponible en français (Sommaire de rapport) Legal Deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2014 Legal Deposit – Library and Archives Canada, 2014 Publication Details Type: Project Publication Date: April 2014 Original language: English Review and quality assurance procedures: Final Party review: April–May 2013 QA12.24 Operational Plan 2011-2012 Project – Big Bend-Río Bravo Collaboration for Transboundary Landscape Conservation/ North American Invasive Species Network. For more information: Commission for Environmental Cooperation 393, rue St-Jacques Ouest, Bureau 200 Montréal (Québec) Canada H2Y 1N9 t (514) 350-4300 f (514) 350-4314 [email protected] / www.cec.org Editors María Dolores Wesson and Catherine Hallmich, CEC Secretariat Jeffery Bennett, National Park Service Carlos Alberto Sifuentes Lugo and Ángel Frías García, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Aimee Michelle Roberson, US Fish and Wildlife Service John Karges, The Nature Conservancy Gary P. Garrett, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Collaborating Authors Gerardo Arturo Bezanilla Enriquez, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua Mark Briggs, World Wildlife Fund Hernando Cabral Perdomo, World Wildlife Fund Mexico Rogelio Carrera, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León Claudia N. Castillo Jiménez, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas José Antonio Dávila Paulin, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Juan Antonio Encina Domínguez, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro Alejandro Espinosa Treviño, Cemex César Alberto González-Zuarth, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche Louis Harveson, Sul Ross State University David Larson, National Park Service Pablo A. Lavín Murcio, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro Mark Lockwood, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Felix Lumbreras, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Andrés Nájera Díaz, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro Helen M. Poulos, Wesleyan University José Roberto Rodríguez Salazar, Grassland bird specialist Samuel Sandoval Solis, University of California, Davis Joseph Sirotnak, National Park Service Raymond Skiles, National Park Service Francisco Torralba González, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Kevin Urbanczyk, Sul Ross State University Elizabeth Verdecchia, International Boundary and Water Commission Conservation Assessment for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region iii Technical Support Jane Barr and Jürgen Hoth (editors) Jacqueline Fortson and Douglas Kirk (CEC editors) Gray Fraser (graphic design) Mihaela Vulpescu (reviewer) Acknowledgements Eduardo Peters, Margarita Caso and Pablo Zamorano de Haro, Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático Mario López Pérez, Carla Hernandez Rivas & Sergio Naranjo, Comisión Nacional del Agua Antonio Rascón, Fabián Márquez Ávila & Ramiro Luján, Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas Gilbert Anaya, International Boundary and Water Commission Patricia Koleff Osario and Ana Isabel Gonzalez, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad Eglantina Canales Gutiérrez, Secretaría de Medioambiente del Gobierno de Coahuila David Crum, Land & Minerals Management Osvel Hinojosa, Pronatura Noroeste Gabriel Holschneider, Rainmaker Group Bonnie McKinney and Billy Pat McKinney, Cemex Guillermo Osuna, Conservadores de Ecosistemas del Puerto del Pino Robert Potts, The Dixon Water Foundation Lorenzo J. de Rosenzweig, Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza A.C. Francisco Zamora, Sonora Institute See the full list of the Experts’ Meeting participants in the Appendix. iv Commission for Environmental Cooperation Foreword On behalf of the US Department of the Interior (DOI), I would like to personally congratulate everyone who contributed to the development of the “Conservation Assessment for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region: A Binational Collaborative Approach to Conservation.” I am confident that the Assessment will be used to guide and inform important conservation decisions for years to come and I am hopeful that this unique and cooperative approach to conservation will be replicated elsewhere. By implementing the Recommendations outlined in the Assessment, we can collectively work to protect the extraordinary biological diversity of this shared desert ecosystem for current and future generations. I would also like to recognize the tireless efforts of Jeff Bennett at the National Park Service and Carlos Sifuentes at Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, who graciously volunteered to serve as the co-chairs for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Steering Committee. Finally, I would like to thank the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) for its generous technical and financial support, without which this project would not have been possible. When Big Bend National Park was established on 12 June 1944, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt of the United States of America wrote to President Manuel Ávila Camacho of Mexico, “I do not believe that this undertaking in the Big Bend will be complete until the entire park area in this region on both sides of the Rio Grande forms one great international park.” Almost 70 years later, we celebrate the latest step in the long and productive history of bilateral cooperation in the conservation of natural and cultural resources between the United States and Mexico with the publication of this robust and scientifically-grounded Conservation Assessment. Lori Faeth Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs US Department of the Interior The Big Bend-Río Bravo natural area of binational interest builds on nearly 70 years of purposeful efforts between the governments of Mexico and the United States, aimed at conserving more than 1.3 million hectares of unique and highly diverse landscapes and ecosystems. This initiative strengthens our common objective of transboundary conservation in one of the most diverse areas among the world’s arid and semi-arid ecosystems. The CEC project, “Big Bend-Río Bravo Collaboration for Transboundary Landscape Conservation,” has brought about a renewed agenda for binational conservation; it has fostered effective partnerships among various stakeholders and supported crucial restoration actions. For Mexico, this project sets an important precedent for future binational conservation efforts along the country’s northern and southern borders. The present publication is the fruit of the work of the project and represents a cornerstone for conservation policies between the two countries, based on assessments from multiple actors, and will define conservation and restoration priorities for years to come. It is Conanp’s wish that the strategic binational efforts embodied in this Assessment be promoted and strengthened in future conservation policies for this exceptional landscape—a vital part of the natural heritage of our two countries. Luis Fueyo Mac Donald National Commissioner of Natural Protected Areas (Mexico) Conservation Assessment for the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region v Desert bighorn sheep Photo:vi Marieke Ijsendoorn-KuijpersCommission for Environmental Cooperation Table of Contents Foreword v Executive Summary ix Background xi Purpose xi Process xii Priority Conservation Areas in the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region (map) 1 Conservation Targets (table) 2 Protected Areas in the United States and Mexico 15 International Treaties and Commitments in the Big Bend-Río Bravo region 17 Aquatic and Riparian Habitats 19 Grasslands 43 Mountains 55 General Recommendations (table) 76 References 79 Acronyms 83 Glossary 84 Appendix: Participants in the Experts’ Meeting 87 List of Figures Figure 1: Overview of the process followed to develop the Conservation Assessment xii Figure 2: Detailed description of the process for the development of the Conservation Assessment, including the Experts’ Meeting (steps 1-5), and the public review and peer review (step 6) leading up to the final Conservation Assessment xiii Figure 3: Priority Conservation Areas in the Big Bend-Río Bravo Region grouped by habitat type: Aquatic and Riparian Habitats, Grasslands, and Mountains 1 Wax production from candelilla in Jaboncillos, Coahuila Photo:viii María DoloresCommission Wesson for Environmental Cooperation Executive Summary The borderlands of the Chihuahuan Desert, in the Big that facilitated their focus on priority in the region. This Bend-Río Bravo (BBRB; the Rio Grande is known as analysis was used to compile a list of recommendations the Río Bravo in Mexico) region, have one of the high- applicable to the entire region of interest, and to identify est levels of diversity and endemic
Recommended publications
  • 9111-14 Department of Homeland
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/28/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-31328, and on FDsys.gov 9111-14 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Part 100 U.S. Customs and Border Protection 19 CFR Part 101 Docket No. USCBP-2011-0032 CBP Dec. No. 12-23 RIN 1651-AA90 Opening of Boquillas Border Crossing and Update to the Class B Port of Entry Description AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule establishes a border crossing in Big Bend National Park called Boquillas and designates it as a Customs station for customs purposes and a Class B port of entry (POE) for immigration purposes. The Boquillas crossing will be situated between Presidio and Del Rio, Texas. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the National Park Service (NPS) are partnering on the construction of a joint use facility in Big Bend National Park where the border crossing will operate. This rule also updates the description of a Class B port of entry to reflect current border crossing documentation requirements. EFFECTIVE DATE: [Insert date 30 days after date of publication of this document in the Federal Register.] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen Manaher, Director, Land Border Integration, CBP Office of Field Operations, telephone 202-344-3003. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule establishes a border crossing in Big Bend National Park called Boquillas and designates it as a Customs station for customs purposes and a Class B port of entry for immigration purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Big Bend and the Davis Mountains April 22-29, 2017
    Texas Big Bend and the Davis Mountains Participants: Anne, Craig, David, Frank, Hilary, Jan, Joan, Judith, Lori, Linda, Neil, Skip and Stephen April 22-29, 2017 GUIDES Woody Wheeler and Lynn Tennefoss Sunset through "The Window" at Chisos Basin, Big Bend National Park Day One: El Paso to McNary Reservoir, Balmorhea State Park and Fort Davis Appropriately, we started this journey on Earth Day. We departed from El Paso on an unusually cool but sunny day – ideal for travelling. El Paso and its suburbs swiftly gave way to the vast expanses of the Chihuahuan Desert. An hour east, and well into the desert, we exited off the freeway at McNary Reservoir. At the exit underpass, we found a small colony of Cave Swallows searching for nest sites. This was a life bird for many in our group. Nearby, we pulled into the completely unassuming McNary Reservoir. From below it appears to be a scrubby, degraded bank. Upon cresting the bank, however, there is a sizeable reservoir. Here we found Clark’s Grebes performing a small portion of their spectacular mating dance that resembles a synchronized water ballet. Western Grebes were also nearby, as were a variety of wintering waterfowl and an unexpected flock of Willet. Gambel’s Quail perched conspicuously and called loudly from the shore. Just as we were about to depart, Lynn spotted a lone Ruddy Duck bringing our total to 17 species of Gambel's Quail birds at our first stop. We stopped for lunch at a colorful Mexican restaurant in Van Horn that has hosted a number of celebrities over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIONS of WEST TEXAS Photo by Jeff Parker/Explore in Focus.Com
    STUDYING THE LIONS OF WEST TEXAS Photo by Jeff Parker/Explore in Focus.com Studies show that apex predators, such as mountain lions, play a role in preserving biodiversity through top-down regulation of other species. 8 TEXAS WILDLIFE JULY 2016 STUDYING THE LIONS OF WEST TEXAS Article by MARY O. PARKER umans have long been fascinated by Texas’ largest felines. Ancient rock art in Seminole Canyon State Park provides glimpses into this allure. There, in the park’sH Panther Cave, rock art estimated to have been created in 7,000 B.C. tells of a unique relationship between mountain lions and man. Drawings depict interactions between the felines and medicine men, while other images show humans donning cat- like ears. We don’t know what those ancient artists called the cats, but these days Puma concolor goes by many names—cougar, panther, puma, painter and, especially in Texas, mountain lion. No matter what you call them, we’re still just as interested in them today as were those prehistoric people long ago. Now, however, we use cameras and GPS technology to document both the mountain lions’ world and our own. Two modern-day researchers, TWA members Dr. Patricia Moody Harveson and Dr. Louis Harveson, director of Sul Ross State University’s Borderlands Research Institute, have been fascinated by the felines for years. In 2011, they began what’s casually known as The Davis Mountains Study. The project, generously funded by private donors, focuses on mountain lion ecology and predator-prey dynamics on private lands within the Davis Mountains. WWW.TEXAS-WILDLIFE.ORG 9 STUDYING THE LIONS OF WEST TEXAS Of 27 species captured by Davis Mountains game cameras, feral hogs appeared twice as often as deer which were the second most abundant species photographed.
    [Show full text]
  • Primera Seccion I N D I C E
    PRIMERA SECCION ORGANO DEL GOBIERNO CONSTITUCIONAL DEL ESTADO INDEPENDIENTE, LIBRE Y SOBERANO DE COAHUILA DE ZARAGOZA TOMO CXIX Saltillo, Coahuila, martes 19 de junio de 2012 número 49 REGISTRADO COMO ARTÍCULO DE SEGUNDA CLASE EL DÍA 7 DE DICIEMBRE DE 1921. FUNDADO EN EL AÑO DE 1860 LAS LEYES, DECRETOS Y DEMÁS DISPOSICIONES SUPERIORES SON OBLIGATORIAS POR EL HECHO DE PUBLICARSE EN ESTE PERIÓDICO RUBÉN IGNACIO MOREIRA VALDEZ Gobernador del Estado de Coahuila de Zaragoza MIGUEL ÁNGEL RIQUELME SOLÍS GABRIELA ALEJANDRA DE LA CRUZ RIVAS Secretario de Gobierno y Director del Periódico Oficial Subdirectora del Periódico Oficial I N D I C E PODER EJECUTIVO DEL ESTADO ACUERDO del Ejecutivo del Estado de Coahuila, por el que se establece el modelo de intervención para la prevención de 1 la problemática de los niños y las niñas que desertan de la escuela para dedicarse a trabajar. REGLAMENTO Interior del Instituto Coahuilense de la Infraestructura Física Educativa. 3 ACUERDO del Municipio de Saltillo, Coahuila mediante el cual se crea la dependencia de la administración pública 29 centralizada denominada Instituto Municipal de la Mujer de Saltillo, Coahuila. ACUERDO del Municipio de Saltillo, Coahuila mediante el cual se aprueba el dictamen presentado por la Comisión de 32 Planeación, Urbanismo, Obras Públicas y Centro Histórico, en consecuencia, la modificación de la 2ª etapa y la lotificación de la 3ª, 4ª, 5ª y 6ª etapa del fraccionamiento habitacional de interés social de densidad alta (H5) denominado “Portal de las Lomas”, ubicado en el Blvd. Militar de esta ciudad, con una superficie total de 269,913.660 m2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female of Paltothemis Cyanosoma Garrison (Odonata: Libellulidae) Folia Entomológica Mexicana, Vol
    Folia Entomológica Mexicana ISSN: 0430-8603 [email protected] Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, A.C. México González Soriano, Enrique The female of paltothemis cyanosoma garrison (odonata: libellulidae) Folia Entomológica Mexicana, vol. 44, núm. Su1, noviembre, 2005, pp. 107-110 Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, A.C. Xalapa, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42409913 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Folia Entomol. Mex., 44 (Supl. 1): 107-110 (2005) THE FEMALE OF PALTOTHEMIS CYANOSOMA GARRISON (ODONATA:LIBELLULIDAE) ENRIQUE GONZÁLEZ-SORIANO Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Departamento de Zoología Apartado Postal 70-153, C. P. 04510 México, D. F. [email protected] González-Soriano, E. 2005. The female of Paltothemis cyanosoma Garrison (Odonata: Libellulidae). Folia Entomol. Mex., 44 (Supl. 1): 107-110. ABSTRACT. The female of Paltothemis cyanosoma Garrison is described and illustrated. A key to separate all species of Paltothemis is given. KEY W ORDS: Odonata, Anisoptera, Libellulidae, Paltothemis cyanosoma, female description. González-Soriano, E. 2005. La hembra de Paltothemis cyanosoma Garrison (Odonata: Libellulidae). Folia Entomol. Mex., 44 (Supl. 1): 107-110. RESUMEN. Se describe e ilustra la hembra de Paltothemis cyanosoma Garrison. Se proporciona una clave para separar las especies conocidas de Paltothemis. PALABRAS CLAVE: Odonata, Anisoptera, Libellulidae, Paltothemis cyanosoma, descripción de la hembra. The genus Paltothemis Karsch has been inclu- compare it with those of P. lineatipes and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Calcite Deposits of the Republic of Mexico
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Bulletin 954-D OPTICAL CALCITE DEPOSITS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MEXICO BY . CARL FRIES, JR, . Prepared in cooperation with the COMITfi DIRECTIVO PARA LA JNVESTIGACI6N DE LOS RECURSOS M1NERALES DE MEXICO under the auspices of INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE ON SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL COOPERATION, DEPARTMENT OF STATE Geologic Investigations in the American Republics, 1946 (Pages 113-179) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1948 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price 20 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract. _.__..__-.-_------_-_-_---_--__----, -_---_-..___._____... 113 Introduction- _..__________-_________-_---_-.-____._____..._..___... 114 Distribution and accessibility of deposits._._-_-___-_______.___.__ 114 Field work and acknowledgments__-____---__--_-__--_-_-_-______ 115 History of exploration and mining__-__-----__-_-----___-_-_--_______ 117 Varieties and properties of the mineral calcite- -_______________________ 119 Common varieties based on crystallization ._-._____.____.______ 119 Properties of calcite crystals____--------_--_^____-_-_-----_____.. 120 Forms and habits__-___--_------_--__-___--_-_---________ 120 Twins and twinning lamellae_-___-_-.-_------__-__-.__.... 123 Physical, optical, and chemical properties_._________________ . 128 Optical calcite________________---_____-___-___---_--__.____._._._ 130 Terms applied, uses, and specifications--------------.--.-.---.--.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STORIES David Spener
    THE STORIES David Spener CCllaannddeessttiinnee CCrroossssiinnggss:: TThhee SSttoorriieess © 2010 by David Spener, Ph.D. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Trinity University San Antonio, Texas U.S.A. Published electronically by the author at http://www.trinity.edu/clandestinecrossings as a companion to the book Clandestine Crossings: Migrants and Coyotes on the Texas-Mexico Border (Cornell University Press, 2009). Direct correspondence to [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 It Was a Lot of Money, but It Was Worth It 6 Chapter 2 El Carpintero 32 Chapter 3 Divided Lives 36 Chapter 4 Se batalla mucho 78 Chapter 5 You Can Cross Any Time You Want 108 Chapter 6 From Matamoros to Houston 128 Chapter 7 I Helped Them Because I Had Suffered, Too 157 Chapter 8 Criminal Enterprise or Christian Charity? 176 Chapter 9 Sandra, in San Antonio, on Her Way to Seattle 198 Bilingual Glossary of Migration-Related Terms 215 Entre tu pueblo y mi pueblo Between your people and my people, hay un punto y una raya. there are a dot and a dash. La raya dice “No hay paso,” The dash says, “No Crossing,” y el punto “Vía cerrada.” and the dot, “Road Closed.” Y así entre todos los pueblos And that’s how it is between all the raya y punto, punto y raya. peoples: Dash and dot, dash and dot. Con tantas rayas y puntos With so many dashes and dots, el mapa es un telegrama. the map is a telegram. Caminando por el mundo Walking through this world, se ven ríos y montañas you’ll see rivers and mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Populations in Texas
    Wildlife Populations in Texas • Five big game species – White-tailed deer – Mule deer – Pronghorn – Bighorn sheep – Javelina • Fifty-seven small game species – Forty-six migratory game birds, nine upland game birds, two squirrels • Sixteen furbearer species (i.e. beaver, raccoon, fox, skunk, etc) • Approximately 900 terrestrial vertebrate nongame species • Approximately 70 species of medium to large-sized exotic mammals and birds? White-tailed Deer Deer Surveys Figure 1. Monitored deer range within the Resource Management Units (RMU) of Texas. 31 29 30 26 22 18 25 27 17 16 24 21 15 02 20 28 23 19 14 03 05 06 13 04 07 11 12 Ecoregion RMU Area (Ha) 08 Blackland Prairie 20 731,745 21 367,820 Cross Timbers 22 771,971 23 1,430,907 24 1,080,818 25 1,552,348 Eastern Rolling Plains 26 564,404 27 1,162,939 Ecoregion RMU Area (Ha) 29 1,091,385 Post Oak Savannah 11 690,618 Edwards Plateau 4 1,308,326 12 475,323 5 2,807,841 18 1,290,491 6 583,685 19 2,528,747 7 1,909,010 South Texas Plains 8 5,255,676 28 1,246,008 Southern High Plains 2 810,505 Pineywoods 13 949,342 TransPecos 3 693,080 14 1,755,050 Western Rolling Plains 30 4,223,231 15 862,622 31 1,622,158 16 1,056,147 39,557,788 Total 17 735,592 Figure 2. Distribution of White-tailed Deer by Ecological Area 2013 Survey Period 53.77% 11.09% 6.60% 10.70% 5.89% 5.71% 0.26% 1.23% 4.75% Edwards Plateau Cross Timbers Western Rolling Plains Post Oak Savannah South Texas Plains Pineywoods Eastern Rolling Plains Trans Pecos Southern High Plains Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants in Action by STEVE WAGNER
    NO AMOUNT OF MONEY Grants in Action BY STEVE WAGNER VOLUNTEERS FIND PERSONAL REWARDS IN A WORK PROJECT INSPIRED BY DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP, BUT WHICH BENEFITS ALL KINDS OF WILDLIFE. REPRINTED FROM GAME TRAILS SUMMER 2015 NO AMOUNT OF MONEY irty, smelly and exhausted, Charlie Barnes has never been more gratified. D The DSC Life Member from Trophy Club, Texas, lays down his tools, pulls off his work gloves, draws a deep breath of desert air and bellies up to a tailgate, where a troop of equally sweaty-but-satisfied volunteers is gathering around a cooler of liquid refreshment. Sipping through dry, grinning lips, they gaze upon their collective handiwork. Together, they’ve just finished a project that changes the landscape, both literally and figuratively, for wildlife in the arid Trans-Pecos region of west Texas. Soon, many kinds of species will be sipping here, too. A new guzzler – a device to catch, store and dispense rainwater for thirsty critters – now stands ready for the next downpour. Ready to help the habitat overcome its harshest limitation. “This place has everything it needs to be great habitat for wildlife, except for water, and we just solved that problem,” says Barnes. “Building a guzzler is doing something good for the future, and there’s no amount of money that could replace what I get out of being a part of it.” He explains, “I’m a member of 11 different conservation groups and I volunteer This Reservoir stores rainwater for the dry season. for a multitude of tasks. I help raise money, organize banquets and serve on committees and boards.
    [Show full text]
  • Water for All Texans
    Water for All Texans 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Texas Water Trade’s mission is to unleash the power of markets and technological innovation to build a future of clean, flowing water for all Texans. LETTER FROM THE CEO Greetings,I am thrilled to present you with Texas Water Trade’s first Annual Report. And what a year it’s been! We’ve stepped up to the challenge as a young start-up, raising money and setting big goals. It’s been rewarding to make plans with our partners on the ground across the state and deliver on our mission to bring clean, abundant and flowing water to all Texans. Halfway through our first full year in existence, COVID-19 hit. Like all of you, the 2020 we had planned was very different from the year we experienced. One of the many lessons the year has taught us is the importance of clean, flowing water—for our mental and our physical health. For many of us, water is where we go to find inspiration, solace and joy. When COVID closed us off from so much of the rest of our lives, our waters were still there. For me, our springs, rivers and bays were even more precious this year than ever before. That’s why at Texas Water Trade, we’re dedicated to building a future in which clean, flowing water is never a distant memory. From Comanche Springs and the Pecos River in West Texas to the rivers of the Hill Country and all the way to the Texas Gulf Coast, we are there working with our conservation peers, government agencies, and communities to restore and protect the waters that make Texas home.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Big Bend National Park Texas May 2016 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Big Bend National Park Texas May 2016 Foundation Document Unpaved road Trail Ruins S A N 385 North 0 5 10 Kilometers T Primitive road Private land within I A Rapids G 0 5 10 Miles (four-wheel-drive, park boundary O high-clearance Please observe landowner’s vehicles only) BLACK GAP rights. M WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA Persimmon Gap O U N T A Stillwell Store and RV Park Graytop I N S Visitor Center on Dog Cany Trail d o a nch R 2627 TEXAS Ra a u ng Te r l i 118 Big Bend Dagger Mountain Stairway Mountain S I National Park ROSILLOS MOUNTAINS E R R A DAGGER Camels D r Packsaddle Rosillos e FLAT S Hump E v i l L I Mountain Peak i E R a C r R c Aqua Fria A i T R B n A Mountain o A e t CORAZONES PEAKS u c lat A L ROSILLOS gger F L S Da O L O A d RANCH ld M R n G a Hen Egg U O E A d l r R i Mountain T e T O W R O CHRI N R STM I A Terlingua Ranch o S L L M O a e O d d n U LA N F a TA L r LINDA I A N T G S Grapevine o d Fossil i a Spring o Bone R R THE Exhibit e Balanced Rock s G T E L E P d PAINT GAP l H l RA O N n SOLITARIO HILLS i P N E N Y O a H EV ail C A r Slickrock H I IN r LL E T G Croton Peak S S Mountain e n Government n o i I n T y u Spring v Roys Peak e E R e le n S o p p a R i Dogie h C R E gh ra O o u G l n T Mountain o d e R R A Panther Junction O A T O S Chisos Mountains r TERLINGUA STUDY BUTTE/ e C BLACK MESA Visitor Center Basin Junction I GHOST TOWN TERLINGUA R D Castolon/ Park Headquarters T X o o E MADERAS Maverick Santa Elena Chisos Basin Road a E 118
    [Show full text]
  • Big Bend U.S
    National Park Service Big Bend U.S. Department of the Interior Big Bend National Park 2006 Fact Sheet View of Elephant Tusk peak from the South Rim Dean Straw Big Bend National Park was authorized by Congress in 1935 to preserve and protect a representative area of the Chihuahuan Desert along the Rio Grande for the benefi t and enjoyment of present and future generations. The park includes rich biological and geological diversity, cultural history, recreational resources, and outstanding opportunities for bi-national protection of our shared natural and cultural heritage. Overview Park Purpose Park Signifi cance Big Bend National Park’s purpose is threefold: The park is signifi cant because it contains • Preserve and protect all natural and national the most representative example of the register-eligible cultural resources and values. Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem in the United • Provide educational opportunities to foster States. The park’s river, desert, and mountain understanding and appreciation of the natural and environments support an extraordinary richness human history of the region. of biological diversity, including endemic • Provide recreational opportunities for diverse plants and animals, and provide unparalleled groups that are compatible with the protection and recreation opportunities. The geologic features appreciation of park resources. and Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils in Big Bend National Park furnish opportunities to Establishment study the sedimentary and igneous processes. Established as Texas Canyons State Park in May 1933; Archeological and historic resources provide name changed to Big Bend State Park, October 1933; examples of cultural interaction in the Big Bend authorized by Congress as a National Park in 1935; Region and varied ways humans adapted to the established as a National Park in 1944.
    [Show full text]