CBC/Radio-Canada Has Identified Three Areas of Concern with Ctvgm’S Application

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CBC/Radio-Canada Has Identified Three Areas of Concern with Ctvgm’S Application 5 April 2007 Ms. Diane Rhéaume Secretary-General Canadian Radio-Television & Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A ON2 Re: Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2007-3- Item 1, Application by CTVglobemedia Inc. (CTVgm) (formerly Bell Globemedia Inc.), on behalf of CHUM Limited (CHUM) (Application No. 2006-1667-5) Dear Ms. Rhéaume: Introduction 1 The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation/Radio-Canada (“CBC/Radio- Canada”) is pleased to submit the following intervention in response to an application by CTVglobemedia (CTVgm) on behalf of CHUM Limited (CHUM) seeking approval for the transfer of all of the Common Shares of CHUM to CTVgm’s wholly-owned subsidiary 1714882 Ontario Inc. 2 CTVgm is the largest broadcasting conglomerate in English Canada with extensive assets in the area of conventional television, specialty services, newspaper and new media. CHUM is the third largest broadcasting group in English Canada with significant assets in conventional television, specialty services, radio and new media. If approved by the Commission, this transaction would create a broadcasting entity of unprecedented scope and scale across all broadcasting platforms. 2 3 According to its application, CTVgm wishes to retain a subset of CHUM’s regulated operations and divest the remaining licensed undertakings to independent third parties.1 However, the latter are marginal assets and the proposed divestiture does not at all reduce the significance of this transaction. 4 CTVgm values the transaction – as it relates to the regulated assets which CTVgm wishes to retain - at $1.36 billion and proposes a tangible benefits package for the relevant assets (conventional television, specialty services and radio) amounting to $103.5 million. 5 CBC/Radio-Canada has identified three areas of concern with CTVgm’s application: • The resulting entity would have an unprecedented scope and scale in the Canadian broadcasting system, which would grant it an undue competitive advantage and have a significant adverse effect on other broadcasters, such as CBC Television, in both the advertising market and in the programming supply market. • The transaction would result in a concentration of ownership which would have an unacceptable impact on the plurality and diversity of voices in English Canada and would directly conflict with the Commission’s common ownership policy for conventional television stations. • The proposed valuation of the transaction is incorrect and the proposed distribution of tangible benefits is inappropriate. 6 As a result of these concerns, and specifically, in view of the inappropriate nature of the distribution of the proposed benefits, CBC/Radio-Canada opposes the CTVgm application. CBC/Radio-Canada wishes to appear at the oral hearing to present and expand upon its views. 1 The divested assets would comprise CHUM’s A-Channel Television Stations (CIVI-TV Victoria, CHRO- TV Pembroke, CHRO-TV-34 Ottawa, CFPL-TV London, CHWI-TV Wheatley, CKNX-TV Wingham, CKVR-TV Barrie), CKX-TV Brandon, Access: The Educational Station, The Learning Channel and SexTV: The Channel. 3 The Creation of a Juggernaut 7 CTVgm owns 25 conventional television stations, 21 specialty services, the Atlantic Satellite Network (ASN) and 40% of TQS. In the Fall of 2006 CTVgm aired 16 of the top 20 shows on English television. In 2005, CTVgm received 36% of total English television advertising revenues – nearly 50% more than its nearest rival, Canwest, which had a 25% share of the advertising pie. TV Advertising Revenues by Major Player, English-Language Services 2005 Other Quebecor 6% 1% CBC CTVglobemedia 6% Rogers 1% 36% Corus 6% Alliance Atlantis 5% Canwest CHUM 25% 14% Source: CBC/Radio-Canada estimates based on CRTC Data 8 There can be no doubt that, even prior to its proposed acquisition of CHUM, CTVgm is by far the largest and most successful television broadcaster in English Canada. 9 CHUM is the third largest English language broadcaster in Canada with 12 conventional television stations, 21 specialty services, 34 radio stations and a subscription radio licence. In 2005 CHUM garnered 14% of total English television advertising revenues. 4 10 If the new CTVgm were to come into existence, its dominant position in the Canadian broadcasting system – especially in the area of English television - would have very serious consequences for other broadcasters. 11 In the area of advertising, CTVgm’s enormous number of services, as well as its success at acquiring top shows – in part because of the depth of its financial resources - would provide it with an unprecedented degree of power in the advertising market. In particular, CTVgm would be in a position to demand that advertisers wishing to purchase spots in the most popular “must have” programs would have to purchase a bundle of ads across its full range of services, including some of CTVgm’s less attractive spots. This could include buys on Citytv to further support its move into the US simulcast business that is already improving its power ratio. Power Ratio* of English-Language Conventional TV Services, 2002 - 2005 3.6 CTV 3.4 3.2 o CanWest 3.0 2.8 CHUM Power Rati 2.6 2.4 2.2 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: CRTC; BBM/NMR * Power Ratio: Revenue share / Previous year audience share 12 The dominant position of CTVgm in the advertising market would significantly impair the ability of smaller broadcasters, including CBC Television, to grow their advertising revenues. Given that over 50 % of CBC television’s funding comes from commercial revenues, and that the vast majority of this amount is derived from advertising, this situation could have a very serious negative effect on CBC/Radio-Canada’s ability to fulfil its licence conditions and its statutory mandate. The same would likely also be true for private sector television licensees. 5 13 The timing of such an outcome is particularly problematic. As the Commission is well aware, the advertising market for conventional television broadcasters has stalled and may soon be in decline. The most recent evidence that describes this situation comes from the Commission’s 2006 Private Conventional Television Financial Summaries, where total conventional broadcaster advertising revenues (local and national) experienced a mere 0.2% annual growth in 2006. CBC/Radio-Canada Television and other small private conventional television broadcasters, who are already suffering from this market stagnation, will be the hardest hit by this proposed merger that will draw together and control a greater proportion of increasingly elusive advertising dollars. 14 In addition to dominance in advertising, CTVgm would also achieve an unprecedented dominance in the market for programming. It is already the case that CTVgm acquires significant excess programming that stays on the shelf. This is programming that other broadcasters might have wished to buy but could not. CTVgm also engages in restraint of trade because its programming power gives it the leverage to significantly outbid other players for major properties, such as the Olympics, and thereby discourage the formation of competitive programming alliances around specific program properties, particularly sports. 15 The new CTVgm would have significantly enhanced buying power and a much greater array of television viewing slots for the programming it acquires. With advertising revenues likely to be twice those of Canwest and 8 times those of CBC Television, the new CTVgm would be able to outbid virtually all other broadcasters for the most popular programming – foreign or Canadian. This extraordinary buying power would further entrench CTVgm’s ratings position, reinforce its dominance in the advertising market and provide it with yet greater strength in the programming market. 16 The potential for a snowballing effect is obvious. The end result could be an overwhelmingly dominant television broadcaster with all other broadcasters playing only niche or marginal roles. And, even if the situation were to stabilize prior to reaching such an extreme result, it would almost certainly settle in a way that would leave CTVgm in a position of unrivalled predominance in the English television market. Other broadcasters would be seriously weakened and unable to contribute in 6 anywhere near the same fashion to the broadcasting system as they have in the past. This would be as true for CBC Television as it would for private broadcasters. 17 Approval of this transaction as presented by CTVgm would give the new CTVgm 30 conventional television stations – almost 30% more than the next largest player Canwest, 37 specialty services – more than any other player in the system, 50% of total advertising revenues in the English market and real dual station ownership in all of the must-buy markets in English Canada. 18 In CBC/Radio-Canada’s submission, CTVgm’s proposed acquisition of CHUM would have a totally unacceptable impact on the Canadian broadcasting system by creating a single broadcaster of unprecedented size and dominance. The negative consequences for other broadcasters and for the system as a whole would be extremely serious. In order for a competitive market to function effectively there has to be some measure of balance between the players. If approved, this transaction would put the Canadian broadcasting system seriously out of balance. 19 There is no counterbalancing public policy reason which would justify allowing this transaction to proceed on the basis proposed by CTVgm given the negative implications for the Canadian broadcasting system. Moreover, the proposed transaction is especially inappropriate given the potential social consequences that could result from such a concentration of media ownership and control. Concentration of Ownership – The Impact on Plurality and Diversity 20 In addition to the economic and operational consequences of CTVgm’s proposal, there is also a concern for the maintenance of a plurality and diversity of voices in Canadian broadcasting. 21 This is a matter of vital importance for the democratic, social and cultural health of Canadian society. If a free and democratic society is to be healthy and vibrant there must be both a plurality and a diversity of voices available across all 7 media.
Recommended publications
  • Hydro Settled Cabinet Shuffle Thvancouver (CP) -- Prepared to Accept E
    CdMP. 77178 /6t VSV-1 :'~ B.C. Tel on strike •i Local members of the the adoption of the CABLE CUT Telecommunications recommendations of A cable south of Workers Union employed mediator Dr. Noel Hall, Nanaimo on Vancouver • ~ at B.C. Telephone •who issued his report in Island was cut Wed- Company joined in a June. nesday, disrupting tele- prownce-wide strike by Disagreement on the phone services on walking off the job issue of contracting out Gabriola Island. The yesterday. led to a breakdown in damage also disrupted Pickets formed outside negotiations last week. services for about 75 the B.C. Tel offices on Company sl~kesman customers in Nanaimo Kalum Thursday .mor- Jim Peacock stud the day and knocked local radio started with about 3,000 station CHUB off the air ni~'roughoht the workers off the job. for two hours. province, 10,000 members "Less than three hours ~j ~ I~ of theTWU staged walk- before shift started, the It was the third cable- outs in an escalation of remaining 7,-000 in the slashing incident near the their rotating strike bargaining "unit were Vancouver Island city action. either forced to leave since 280 union members About 800 of the their jobs by pickets walked off the job there striking workers are posted outside their of- earlier this week. t employed at Canadian fices or were called off "It was an emergency work by shop stewards," situation over there," Telephones and Supplies, he said. a subsidiary o~ B.C, Tel said Matthews. "Those t. which has its bead office He said about 1,500 oeople were completely in B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Union Not Good, Says Ford
    PAGE SIXTEEN - MANCHESTER EVENING HERALD, Manchester, Conn,, Tues., Jan, 14, 1975 OBITUARIES Manning To Talk To Art Group Mrs. Theresa Brozna Fred Sharis, both of Windsor; The Tolland County Art Mrs. Theresa Babula Brozna, and nine grandchildren. A B O U T T O W N Association will have Robert 84, of 49 Salem Rd. died Sunday Funeral services are Manning as its guest speaker at at her home. Wednesday at 2 p.m. at the the meeting scheduled for today Mrs. Brozna was born in John F. Tierney Funeral Home, at 8 p.m. in the Edith Peck 219 W, Center St. Burial will be Manchester Philatelic Socie­ meet tonight at 8 at the home of room of the Rockville Public iianrljPHtFr Eupninn fcalh Austria and lived in Hartford Mrs. Vincent Diana, 141 Pitkin most of her life, coming to in East Cemetery. ty will meet tonight from 7 to 10 Library. at Mott’s Community Hall. The St. Manchester several years ago. Friends may call at the Manning will present a slide program will include informa­ MANCHESTER, CONN., WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 1975- VOL. XCIV, No. 89 t w e n t y -FIG H T p a g e s — TW O s e c t io n s Survivors are 3 sons, Charles funeral home tonight from 7 to program on "Recent Trends in Manchester A City of Village Charm PRICE: FIFTEEN CENTS tion on basic identification, Brozna of Hartford, Stanely 9. Visual Fine Arts from Abstrac­ foreign countries and philatelic tion to Realism.” He is an Brozna of East Hartford and terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2004-21
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2004-21 Ottawa, 21 January 2004 CHUM Limited and 3661458 Canada Inc., partners in Pulse24, general partnership Ontario Application 2002-0956-1 Public Hearing in the National Capital Region 26 May 2003 CablePulse24 – Licence renewal In this decision, the Commission renews the broadcasting licence for the specialty television service known as CablePulse24, from 1 March 2004 to 31 August 2010. The details regarding the licensee’s specific proposals for the new licence term, and the conditions of licence and other obligations determined by the Commission are set out below. The application 1. The Commission received an application by CHUM Limited and 3661458 Canada Inc., partners in Pulse24, general partnership (Pulse 24) for the renewal of the broadcasting licence for the regional (Ontario), English-language, specialty television service known as CablePulse24 (CP24). 2. The Commission's general analysis with respect to its consideration of this and other applications heard at the 26 May 2003 Public Hearing for the licence renewal of specialty television services is set out in Introduction to Broadcasting Decisions CRTC 2004-6 to 2004-27 renewing the licences of 22 specialty services, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, 21 January 2004 (Public Notice 2004-2). 3. The Commission received six interventions specifically in support of CP24’s licence renewal. 4. Other interveners raised general concerns related to all of the specialty television licence renewal applications considered as part of this public process. These concerns are discussed in Public Notice 2004-2. 5. On the basis of its review of this licence renewal application and having considered the interveners' comments, the Commission renews the broadcasting licence for CablePulse24, from 1 March 2004 to 31 August 2010.1 The licence will be subject to the conditions specified therein and to the conditions set out in the appendix to this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Public Space
    CBC/Radio-Canada: Canada’s Public Space Where we’re going At CBC/Radio-Canada, we have been transforming the way we engage with Canadians. In June 2014, we launched Strategy 2020: A Space for Us All, a plan to make the public broadcaster more local, more digital, and financially sustainable. We’ve come a long way since then, and Canadians are seeing the difference. Many are engaging with us, and with each other, in ways they could not have imagined a few years ago. Our connection with the people we serve can be more personal, more relevant, more vibrant. Our commitment to Canadians is that by 2020, CBC/Radio-Canada will be Canada’s public space where these conversations live. Digital is here Last October 19, Canadians showed us that their future is already digital. On that election night, almost 9 million Canadians followed the election results on our CBC.ca and Radio-Canada.ca digital sites. More precisely, they engaged with us and with each other, posting comments, tweeting our content, holding digital conversations. CBC/Radio-Canada already reaches more than 50% of all online millennials in Canada every month. We must move fast enough to stay relevant to them, while making sure we don’t leave behind those Canadians who depend on our traditional services. It’s a challenge every public broadcaster in the world is facing, and CBC/Radio-Canada is further ahead than many. Our Goal The goal of our strategy is to double our digital reach so that 18 million Canadians, one out of two, will be using our digital services each month by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbc Radio One, Today
    Stratégies gagnantes Auditoires et positionnement Effective strategies Audiences and positioning Barrera, Lilian; MacKinnon, Emily; Sauvé, Martin 6509619; 5944927; 6374185 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Rapport remis au professeur Pierre C. Bélanger dans le cadre du cours CMN 4515 – Médias et radiodiffusion publique 14 juin 2014 TABLE OF CONTENT ABSTRACT ......................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 3 CBC RADIO ONE, TODAY ...................................................................... 4 Podcasting the CBC Radio One Channel ............................................... 6 The Mobile App for CBC Radio One ...................................................... 7 Engaging with Audiences, Attracting New Listeners ............................... 9 CBC RADIO ONE, TOMORROW ............................................................. 11 Tomorrow’s Audience: Millennials ...................................................... 11 Fishing for Generation Y ................................................................... 14 Strengthening Market-Share among the Middle-aged ............................ 16 Favouring CBC Radio One in Institutional Settings ................................ 19 CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 21 REFERENCES ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "'Ce';;) .. ·· LES GARANTS D'achevement 'Toronto, John Ross, (416) 466-2760 (\\,\'0" ••• ' Pour Series De Television, Longs Metrages Telex: 055-62276 {'
    CINEMA CAN •A D A BY JIM LEVESQUE George Wright, Helene Fournier, Philip he following is a list of current projects being produced in ATLANTIS p. Paul Saltzman lOp. p . Harold JacksDa.. (416)462-0246 THE WAY WE ARE TIchenor pelt. prod p. Paul Quigley Canada. Only TV series and films over one hour are An anrhok>gy series which showcases p. man. Gordon Mark eXK. 11 . con •. TNI! TWILIQNT ZON. ....KO FILMS LTD. a collection of regional dr8mas Ann MacNaughton d . Rex Bromfield, included. Projects are separated into four categories: On london Films snd AtlantiS Films are (416) 960.3228 T produced in Vancouver, Edmonton, Ken Jubenvill. Allan King, Alan collaborating with CBS BroAdcast THE LAIT fRONTll!R Location, Pre-production, Projects in Negotiation, and In the Can. Calgary. Winnipeg, Regina, Toronto, Simmonds, BradTurnerlI18. d. T. W. Intemational on 30 new 1/2h scl·fi The third season of tne 70 x 1/2h TV Ottawa, Montreal, Halifax, and St. PaacO(;~e, Mick MacKay d.o. p. Bob While films in the project stage are subject to change, only those episodes of the classic series series about the sea. This JOhn·s.ex8C.p. Robert Alten pub. Ennis loc. man. George Horie calt.. Shooting through '88 on location in ad\lenture/documentary series Is in active pre-production at the time of publication - those which Susan Procter wrtterl Peter Roberts, Trish Robinson extral. Annette T oronlo. Delivery at the shows is s1ated co-produced by Mako Films ltd. and Jona1han Campbell, David Pe1ersen, McCafferey art d. Jill Scott pub.
    [Show full text]
  • AGREEMENT Between CTV Television, Division of Bell Media
    AGREEMENT between CTV Television, Division of Bell Media Inc. TORONTO, ONTARIO - and - COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY AND PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA (LOCAL 720-M) January 1, 2012 To December 31, 2017 Table of Contents Article Page 1 Intent ................................................................. 1 Definitions 2.1 Employee .......................................................... 2 2.2 Bargaining Unit ................................................. 2 2.3 Employee Categories ........................................ 3 3 Management Rights .......................................... 5 Union Rights 4.1 Membership and Dues ...................................... 6 4.2 Notices to Union ............................................... 8 4.3 Union Access to Premises ................................. 8 4.4 Union Use of Bulletin Boards ........................... 9 4.5 Leave For Union Activities ............................... 9 4.6 Non-Discrimination .......................................... 11 5 No Strike, Lockouts or Strike-breaking ............ 11 6 Grievance Procedure ......................................... 12 7 Reports on Performance .................................... 15 Table of Contents Article Page Seniority Rights 8.1 Company Seniority ........................................... 17 8.2 Unit Seniority .................................................... 17 8.3 Promotion and Transfers ................................... 17 8.4 Dismissal, Demotion and Suspension 18 8.5 Layoffs .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 13 January 2014
    20 November 2014 John Traversy Secretary General CRTC Ottawa, ON K1A 0N2 Dear Mr. Secretary General, Re: Application 2014‐0793‐2, Broadcasting Notices of Consultation 2014‐541 and 2014‐541‐1 (Ottawa, 21 October 2014 and 27 October 2014) 1 The Forum for Research and Policy in Communications (FRPC) is a non‐profit and non‐partisan organization established to undertake research and policy analysis about communications, including broadcasting. The Forum supports a strong Canadian broadcasting system and regulation that serves the public interest. 2 FRPC is pleased to participate in the process initiated by Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2014‐541, to address the application for a network licence submitted by Rogers Sports Inc. (RSI), the licensee of the Category C specialty service known as Sportsnet. The Forum opposes RSI’s application as it is current set eout, on th grounds of insufficient evidence: RSI has presented too little information to enable the CRTC to know what it would be licensing, and the information that RSI has presented does not establish that its network licence will serve the public interest by achieving Parliament’s objects for the broadcasting system, or by improving or strengthening that system. 3 The Forum wishes to be considered as an intervener in this proceeding, and respectfully requests the opportunity to appear at the hearing scheduled for 8 January 2015 to set out its views in greater detail and to respond to the applicant. Our contact information is provided at the end of our intervention. I The application by Rogers Sports Inc. 4 This section sets out the facts and arguments being made by RSI in support of the application that is asking the CRTC to approve.
    [Show full text]
  • The CRTC's Enforcement of Canada's Broadcast Legislation: 'Concern', 'Serious Concern' and 'Grave Concern'
    Canadian Journal of Law and Technology Volume 5 Number 3 Article 1 8-1-2006 The CRTC's Enforcement of Canada's Broadcast Legislation: 'Concern', 'Serious Concern' and 'Grave Concern' Monica Auer Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cjlt Part of the Computer Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Monica Auer, "The CRTC's Enforcement of Canada's Broadcast Legislation: 'Concern', 'Serious Concern' and 'Grave Concern'" (2006) 5:3 CJLT. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Journal of Law and Technology by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The CRTC’s Enforcement of Canada’s Broadcasting Legislation: ‘‘Concern’’, ‘‘Serious Concern’’, and ‘‘Grave Concern’’ M.L. Auer, M.A., LL.M.† I. Introduction again in 2004, by the Parliamentary Standing Com- mittee on Heritage. Generally speaking, however, these his paper describes results from a quantitative study studies used case-based analyses wherein the conclusions T of the enforcement by the Canadian Radio-televi- necessarily depended on the cases reviewed. This paper sion and Telecommunications Commission 1 (CRTC or adopts a broadly based empirical approach to describe Commission) over the last several decades of Canada’s and analyze the CRTC’s regulation of its conventional, broadcasting legislation and its own regulations. Estab- over-the-air radio licensees from 1968 to 2005. lished by Parliament in 1968, the CRTC is a quasi-judi- This paper concludes that the CRTC uses informal cial regulatory agency that administers Canada’s Broad- sanctions, rather than the penalties set out by Parliament casting Act, 1991 2 as well as the nation’s in Canada’s broadcasting legislation, and that the telecommunications legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Requête Déposée Par L'adisq Au Gouverneur En Conseil DEMANDE
    Requête déposée par l’ADISQ au gouverneur en conseil 29 juin 2017 DEMANDE DE RENVOI AU CRTC POUR RÉEXAMEN ET NOUVELLE AUDIENCE DES DÉCISIONS DE RADIODIFFUSION CRTC 2017-143 ET CRTC-146 Table des matières 1. Abolition de la principale source de financement du vidéoclip : l’ADISQ demande au gouverneur en conseil de renvoyer des décisions au CRTC pour réexamen ............................................................. 1 1.1 Des décisions qui vont à l’encontre des objectifs de la Loi sur la radiodiffusion ......................... 1 2. Les Décisions de radiodiffusion CRTC 2017-143 et 2017-146 mettent fin au financement du vidéoclip par le Fonds Remstar ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Le CRTC ne met en place aucune mesure de remplacement efficace ........................................ 8 2.1.1 Émissions d’Intérêt National (ÉIN) : définition et fonctionnement .......................................... 9 2.1.2 Inefficacité des mesures portant sur les ÉIN pour le vidéoclip : explications ..................... 10 3. L’importance d’un canal de financement prenant en considération la spécificité du vidéoclip ...... 11 3.1 Historique du financement du vidéoclip ........................................................................................... 12 3.2 La mise en place d’un fonds consacré au financement du vidéoclip a permis la naissance d’une industrie québécoise du vidéoclip ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Expansion of the CBC Northern Service and Community Radio
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by YorkSpace Cultural imperialism of the North? The expansion of the CBC Northern Service and community radio Anne F. MacLennan York University Abstract Radio broadcasting spread quickly across southern Canada in the 1920s and 1930s through the licensing of private independent stations, supplemented from 1932 by the Canadian Radio Broadcasting Commission and by its successor, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, from 1936. Broadcasting in the Canadian North did not follow the same trajectory of development. The North was first served by the Royal Canadian Corps of Signals that operated the Northwest Territories and Yukon Radio System from 1923 until 1959. The northern Canadian radio stations then became part of the CBC. This work explores the resistance to the CBC Northern Broadcasting Plan of 1974, which envisaged a physical expansion of the network. Southern programming was extended to the North; however, indigenous culture and language made local northern programmes more popular. Efforts to reinforce local programming and stations were resisted by the network, while community groups in turn rebuffed the network’s efforts to expand and establish its programming in the North, by persisting in attempts to establish a larger base for community radio. Keywords Canadian radio CBC Northern Service community radio indigenous culture broadcasting Inuktitut Fears of American cultural domination and imperialism partially guided the creation of the Canadian Radio Broadcasting Commission in 1932 and its successor the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) in 1936. However, the possibility of the CBC assuming the role of cultural imperialist when it introduced and extended its service to the North is rarely considered.
    [Show full text]
  • CBC/Radio-Canada Needs More Funding and True Independence: CMG Proposals
    CBC/Radio-Canada needs more funding and true independence: CMG proposals The cuts to CBC this year alone amount to one of the biggest layoffs of content creators and journalists in Canadian history. This must be stopped and the longer-term trend at CBC reversed so that our public broadcaster can continue to produce local and national programming on all platforms that is in the public interest. The reckless dismantling of a major cultural resource in a vast, diverse country like ours – next to the U.S. powerhouse with its big commercial broadcasters – is one of the issues people in communities across Canada are seriously concerned about. Here is what CMG is urging all of Canada’s federal political parties to do to reverse the damage: 1. Reverse the $115-million Deficit Reduction Action Plan (DRAP) cut to CBC 2. Increase CBC funding to about half the average of what other developed countries invest in their public broadcaster or $43.5 per capita annually over the next five years, and adjust CBC's parliamentary appropriation for inflation. 3. Ask the CRTC to establish a fund that is dedicated to public service media programming (CBC, TVO, APTN, Tfo, community and independent media) – including local news – on all platforms that meets the diverse and evolving programming needs of Canadians. 4. Repeal Clause 17 of omnibus budget bill C-60 – in the interest of our country and of our reputation as a mature democracy – to remove government’s interference in CBC’s day-to-day operations. 5. Protect CBC/Radio-Canada’s independence by instituting a more public mechanism for selecting the national public broadcaster’s Board and CEO.
    [Show full text]