DOCSLIB.ORG

FELLOWS of the National Academy of Inventors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2013 FELLOWS of the National Academy of Inventors ABOUT THE NAI FELLOWS PROGRAM Election to NAI Fellow status is a high professional distinction accorded to academic inventors who have demonstrated a highly prolific spirit of innovation in creating or facilitating outstanding inventions that have made a tangible impact on quality of life, economic development, and the welfare of society. Academic inventors and innovators elected to the rank of NAI Fellow are nominated by their peers for outstanding contributions to innovation in areas such as patents and licensing, innovative discovery and technology, significant impact on society, and sup- port and enhancement of innovation. The nomination packets are reviewed by the NAI Fellows Selection Committee. The number of Fellows elected each year is dependent on the quality of the nominations submitted. Committee members may not vote on a nominee from their institution. Decisions of the Selection Committee are final. If a nominee is not elected to Fellow status, he or she may be nominated and selected at a future time. HOW TO NOMINATE FOR FELLOWSHIP Nominees must be: n A named inventor on at least one patent issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office n Affiliated with a university, non-profit research institute, governmental agency or other academic entity Nominations open July 1 – November 1 annually The following information must be included with the online submission form: n Nominee’s CV n A full list of nominee’s U.S. Patents n Letter of Nomination n Two Letters of Recommendation Submit nominations online at: www.academyofinventors.com/fellows.asp 2 | 2013 NAI Fellows ABOUT THE 2013 NAI FELLOWS Included in the 2013 class are 26 presidents and senior leadership of research universi- ties and non-profit research institutes, 69 members of the National Academies (NAS, NAE, IOM), five inductees of the National Inventors Hall of Fame, six recipients of the U.S. National Medal of Technology and Innovation, two recipients of the U.S. National Medal of Science, nine Nobel Laureates, five Lemelson-MIT prize recipients, 23 AAAS Fellows, among other awards and distinctions. Collectively, the 2013 Fellows hold more than 5,600 U.S. patents, representing 94 prestigious research universities and govern- mental and non-profit research institutions. The NAI Fellows are inducted at the NAI annual meeting each year. Fellows and their institutions are listed on a plaque on permanent display at the USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. Inducted by: Andrew Faile, United States Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations United States Patent and Trademark Office As the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations, Andrew Faile is responsible for all patent examining functions in the nine Patent Technology Centers, the Office of Patent Training and the Central Reexamination Unit. Andy was the Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patent Op- erations for the Electrical Discipline and has over 20 years of experience in patent examining and operations management. He first joined the USPTO in 1989 as a patent examiner in the areas of cellular telephony, radio frequency communications, and cable television. In 1994, he earned an examiner master’s rating in telecommunications. Recently, Andy served on a joint management/union task force in charge of modernizing the examiner production system. He was awarded the Department of Commerce Silver Medal for his work on the task force. Announced by: Richard Maulsby, Innovation Development Specialist United States Patent and Trademark Office Richard Maulsby joined the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 1994 and served as Director of Public Affairs until 2007. From 2007 to 2010 he was the USPTO’s Senior Communication Specialist. In both of those capacities he coordinated the agency’s external and internal com- munication programs. During his tenure Richard greatly expanded the USPTO’s outreach to its stakeholder groups including independent inventors. In 2010 Richard was named Associate Commissioner for Innovation Development. In that senior leadership role he supervised new and existing programs to better serve independent, minority and women inventors and worked to establish relationships with organizations like the National Academy of Inventors. Follow- ing his retirement in 2012, Richard returned to the USPTO on a part-time basis to coordinate the agency’s collaboration with the Smithsonian Institution to create an Innovation Pavilion on the National Mall. The Pavilion will celebrate the key role inventors and America’s intellectual property system plays in our economy. Prior to joining the USPTO Richard worked in radio and television at stations in Buffalo, New York and Washington, DC. He graduated from the Univer- sity of Nebraska with a B.A. in Radio-TV and received a Master’s Degree in Mass Communica- tion from the State University of New York in Buffalo. 2013 NAI Fellows | 3 HON. KATHY CASTOR OF FLORIDA Extension of Remarks Honoring 2013 Fellows of the National Academy of Inventors Tuesday, February 11, 2014 Ms. CASTOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise Nobel Laureates, and 23 AAAS Cannon-Albright, The University today to honor the 143 inventors Fellows, among other major awards of Utah; Charles R. Cantor, Boston who will soon be recognized at the and distinctions. University; Dennis A. Carson, Uni- United States Patent and Trade- versity of California, San Diego; mark Office and inducted as the The contributions made to society Carolyn L. Cason, The University 2013 Fellows of the National through innovation are im- of Texas at Arlington; David M. Academy of Inventors’ by the measurable. I commend these Center, Boston University; Vinton United States Deputy Com- individuals, and the organizations G. Cerf, National Science Foun- missioner of Patent Operations, that support them, for the work that dation; Stephen Y. Chou, Princeton Andrew Faile. In order to be named they do to revolutionize the world University; Christos Christo- as a Fellow, these men and women we live in. As the following doulatos, Stevens Institute of were nominated by their peers and inventors are inducted, may it Technology; Benjamin Chu, Stony have undergone the scrutiny of the encourage future innovators to Brook University; Aaron J. NAI Selection Committee, having strive to meet this high honor and Ciechanover, Technion-Israel Insti- had their innovations deemed as continue the spirit of innovation. tute of Technology; Graeme M. making significant impact on Clark, The University of Mel- quality of life, economic develop- The 2013 NAI Fellows include: bourne; Leon N. Cooper, Brown ment, and welfare of society. University; Carlo M. Croce, The Collectively, this elite group holds Patrick Aebischer, Ecole Poly- Ohio State University; William W. more than 5,600 patents. technique Federale de Lausanne; Cruikshank, Boston University; Rakesh Agrawal, Purdue Uni- Brian T. Cunningham, University The individuals making up this versity; Dimitris Anastassiou, of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; year’s class of Fellows include Columbia University; David E. Jerome J. Cuomo, North Carolina individuals from 94 research Aspnes, North Carolina State State University; Narendra Da- universities and non-profit research University; Michael Bass, Uni- hotre, University of North Texas; institutes spanning not just the versity of Central Florida; David J. William S. Dalton, H. Lee Moffitt United States but also the world. Bayless, Ohio University; Kurt H. Cancer Center; Rathindra Das- This group of inductees touts 26 Becker, New York University; Gupta, National Science Founda- presidents and senior leadership of Carolyn R. Bertozzi, University of tion; Paul L. DeAngelis, The research universities and non-profit California, Berkeley; Rathindra N. University of Oklahoma; William research institutes, 69 members of Bose, University of Houston; F. DeGrado, University of Cali- the National Academies, five David E. Briles, The University of fornia, San Francisco; Peter J. inductees of the National Inventors Alabama at Birmingham; Richard Delfyett, University of Central Hall of Fame, six recipients of the D. Bucholz, Saint Louis University; Florida; Lawrence J. DeLucas, The National Medal of Technology and Mark A. Burns, University of University of Alabama at Birming- Innovation, two recipients of the Michigan; Anne K. Camper, ham; Steven P. DenBaars, Univer- National Medal of Science, nine Montana State University; Lisa A. sity of California, Santa Barbara; 4 | 2013 NAI Fellows Joseph M. DeSimone, The Univer- Ping Liang, University of Cali- Florida; Venkat Selvamanickam, sity of North Carolina at Chapel fornia, Riverside; Charles M. University of Houston; Wei-Heng Hill; Spiros S. Dimolitsas, George- Lieber, Harvard University; Ste- Shih, Drexel University; Mary town University; Michael P. Doyle, phen B. Liggett, University of Shire, University of Limerick, The University of Georgia; James South Florida; Dennis C. Liotta, Ireland; Henry I. Smith, Mas- A. Dumesic, University of Wis- Emory University; Dmitri Litvinov, sachusetts Institute of Technology; consin-Madison; David A. Ed- University of Houston; Michael R. George F. Smoot, III, University of wards, Harvard University; T. Lovell, University of Wisconsin- California, Berkeley; Thomas C. Taylor Eighmy, The University of Milwaukee; Richard J. Mammone, Südhof, Stanford University; Subra Tennessee, Knoxville; John G. Rutgers, The State University of Suresh, Carnegie Mellon Uni- Elias, University of Delaware; New Jersey; Michael A. Marletta, versity; Theodore F. Taraschi,
Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of

    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of

    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
  • IP Strategies for Green Innovations - an Analysis of European Inventor Awards

    IP Strategies for Green Innovations - an Analysis of European Inventor Awards

    Centre for Technology Management working paper series ISSN 2058-8887 No. 2020/01 January 2020 IP Strategies for Green Innovations - An Analysis of European Inventor Awards https://doi:10.17863/CAM.48823 Pratheeba Vimalnath (IfM, University of Cambridge) * Frank Tietze (IfM, University of Cambridge) Akriti Jain (Centre for Society and Policy, Indian Institute of Science) Viola Prifti (University of Applied Science, HTW-Berlin) * Please contact the corresponding author for feedback: [email protected] Centre for Technology Management IP Strategies for Green Innovations - An Analysis of European Inventor Awards Pratheeba Vimalnath1, Frank Tietze1, Akriti Jain2, Viola Prifti3 1Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom 2Centre for Society and Policy, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India 3University of Applied Science, HTW-Berlin, Berlin, Germany Abstract To drive sustainability transitions on a global scale for a carbon neutral future, green innovations are needed. In this study, we are keen to understand the role of intellectual property (IP) and particularly, its usage by firms innovating for a sustainable future. Unfortunately, little is known about how IP impacts sustainability transitions. To contribute to a better understanding, we chose to investigate IP usage by award - winning green innovators. We study the winners of the European Inventor Award, a highly prestigious international prize, awarded annually by the European Patent Office since 2006. Among all 210 awardees, we identified 52 winners that we classified as green innovators. Our analysis shows that closed and semi-open IP, particularly non-exclusive licensing, are the preferred IP strategies for green innovations. The IP strategy preferences seem to vary across technology domains.
  • Magazine N°04 DÉCEMBRE 2016

    Magazine N°04 DÉCEMBRE 2016

    EPFL Magazine N°04 DÉCEMBRE 2016 POINT FORT > P. 4 LE DÉPART D’UN VISIONNAIRE ACTUS > P. 13 INTERVIEW > P. 16 OFFRES CAMPUS > P. 43 PRIMATES REGAIN JIANG XIAOHUA NOUVEAU BLOG POUR CONTROL OF SCANNE LE SUCCÈS UN BAIN DE CULTURE PARALYZED LIMB DE L’EPFL EN 2017 EPFL MAGAZINE N°04 — DÉCEMBRE 2016 1 ÉDITO Journal de l’EPFL Madeleine von Holzen Editeur responsable Mediacom Mediacom Madeleine von Holzen, Contact de la rédaction [email protected] mediacom.epfl.ch/ epfl-magazine 021 693 21 09 L’ambition comme Ambition as a measure Suzanne Setz, Secrétariat de rédaction, mesure de l’impact of impact mise en page et production Corinne Feuz, Cheffe d’édition Parfait timing : vous trouverez dans cette Perfect timing: on pages 16 to 21 of this Frédéric Rauss, édition en pages 16 à 21 l’interview de edition, you’ll find an interview with a young Responsable de la Chinese researcher who, for the past six communication interne cette jeune chercheuse chinoise qui arpente Rédacteurs les couloirs de l’EPFL depuis six mois months, has been roaming the corridors of Emmanuel Barraud Sarah Bourquenoud pour l’analyser. Plus précisément, pour our campus – to analyze it. More precisely, Anne-Muriel Brouet comprendre les raisons du succès de la jeune she would like to understand what drives Cécilia Carron Sandy Evangelista école polytechnique qui a enregistré la plus the success of our young School, which Nathalie Jollien forte croissance au monde ces dernières over the past years has been growing faster, Nik Papageorgiou Sandrine Perroud années. Promis juré, c’est une coïncidence, worldwide, than any other of its kind.
  • Facebook Timeline

    Facebook Timeline

    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
  • Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine

    Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine

    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-1-2012 Where in the World are the Women of Time? Women and the "Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine Krystle Lynne Anttonelli University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Repository Citation Anttonelli, Krystle Lynne, "Where in the World are the Women of Time? Women and the "Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine" (2012). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1704. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4332685 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHERE ARE THE WOMEN OF TIME? WOMEN AND THE “PERSON OF THE YEAR” COVERS FOR TIME MAGAZINE by Krystle Anttonelli Bachelor
  • Kirwan Update July/August 2010

    Kirwan Update July/August 2010

    Kirwan Update July/August 2010 The Changing Face of Black America Executive Notes Charisma S. Acey number of reasons, including increasingly The immigration issue Assistant Professor of restrictive immigration policies among City and Regional Planning has exploded again with a joint appointment European countries. Moreover, changes into the national spot- at the Kirwan Institute to U.S. immigration policy have directly light with Arizona’s affected the rates of legal migration to the draconian law. Given Most of the increase in scholarship United States: The 1965 act eliminated the the issue’s complexity, on immigration following the 1965 quota system, and refugee policies in the I would like to touch Immigration and Naturalization Act has 1980s also facilitated immigration. The most on four key points. Professor john a. powell followed the dramatic rise in non-European dramatic jump in African immigrant popu- Rather than looking at immigrant diversity, but has been heavily lation was between 2000 and 2005, accord- the immigration issue focused on Latino, Asian, and European ing to the 2007 report by Mary Mederios in isolation, we should socioeconomic attainment and assimila- Kent, “Immigration and America’s Black recognize the effect of our current socio- tion. According to the last U.S. Census, Population,” when 40 percent of the current political situation as the country deals African immigrants to the United States African immigrant population arrived. with a deep recession in the Obama era. from the mid-20th century now num- How do Black Caribbean and Black African Secondly, we should consider the role of ber approximately one million persons, migration differ? Studies of Black Caribbean immigration in Anglo-American global- mostly from West, East, and North Africa, migration have found evidence of assimila- ization, which has become the received with smaller numbers from Southern and tion with Black America, in terms of resi- wisdom for elites.
  • Andrew Grove 3: Mastering Change

    Andrew Grove 3: Mastering Change

    Robert Heller’s Masterclasses Andrew Grove 3 Mastering Change Mastering change Anticipating and exploiting change is the key to success in the twenty-first century. You need to recognize the signs of change early and then develop a timely strategy to cope with it. You must also make sure you carry people with you in the transformation of the organization. PROFITING FROM PARANOIA Whether or not you agree with Andy Grove’s maxim “only the paranoid survive”, the thought is a powerful tool for effective management of change. Strictly speaking, paranoia is a delusion: but the existence of competitive and other threats, whatever your industry, is likely to be only too real. Take your guide from what is happening in the present and forget what has happened in the past in your business, which may be wholly irrelevant. Fight against the tendency to stick to the business and the methods that have sustained your fortunes for so long. AVOIDING DENIAL The opposite of healthy paranoia is unhealthy denial. Change that comes in the form of bad news tends to be denied. To avoid the denial trap, analyze your response honestly and rationally. DEALING WITH BAD NEWS – Do I want this news to be wrong? – Is that why I am denying it? – Or have I conducted a thorough, dispassionate analysis that shows it to be wrong? – Either way, what will be the worst possible result if the news is right and I have done nothing? – What action can and should I take if the news is right? – What is the worst possible result of that action? – What is the best possible result of that action? Rational evaluation of a possible threat as soon as it appears will undermine false optimism and demonstrate what risks you are running through denial and inaction.
  • Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Johannes (Jan) Martinus Burgers

    Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Johannes (Jan) Martinus Burgers

    Heroes of Dislocation Science Here are some notes about some of the (early) "Heroes" of Dislocation Science. It is a purely subjective collection and does not pretend to do justice to the history of the field or the people involved. I will not even remotely try to establish a "ranking", and that's why names appear in alphabetical order. To put things in perspective, let's start with a short history of the invention of the dislocation, followed by their actual discovery. Dislocations were invented long before they were discovered. They came into being in 1934 by hard thinking and not by observation. As ever so often, three people came up with the concept independently and pretty much at the same time. The three inventors were Egon Orowan, Michael Polanyi and Geoffrey Taylor. What they invented was the edge dislocation; the general concept of dislocations had to wait a little longer. Of course, they all knew a few things that gave them the right idea. They knew about atoms and crystals since X- ray diffraction was already in place since 1912. They also knew that plastic deformation occurred by slip on special lattice planes if some shear stress was large enough, and they knew that the stress needed for slip was Advanced far lower than what one would need if complete planes would be slipping on top of each other. They were also aware of the work of others. Guys with big names then and still today, like T. v. Kármán, Jakow Iljitsch Frenkel, or Ludwig Prandtl, had put considerable effort into theories dealing, in modern parlor, with the collective movements of atoms in crystals.
  • Buddhism from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search

    Buddhism from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search

    Buddhism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A statue of Gautama Buddha in Bodhgaya, India. Bodhgaya is traditionally considered the place of his awakening[1] Part of a series on Buddhism Outline · Portal History Timeline · Councils Gautama Buddha Disciples Later Buddhists Dharma or Concepts Four Noble Truths Dependent Origination Impermanence Suffering · Middle Way Non-self · Emptiness Five Aggregates Karma · Rebirth Samsara · Cosmology Practices Three Jewels Precepts · Perfections Meditation · Wisdom Noble Eightfold Path Wings to Awakening Monasticism · Laity Nirvāṇa Four Stages · Arhat Buddha · Bodhisattva Schools · Canons Theravāda · Pali Mahāyāna · Chinese Vajrayāna · Tibetan Countries and Regions Related topics Comparative studies Cultural elements Criticism v • d • e Buddhism (Pali/Sanskrit: बौद धमर Buddh Dharma) is a religion and philosophy encompassing a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices, largely based on teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, commonly known as the Buddha (Pāli/Sanskrit "the awakened one"). The Buddha lived and taught in the northeastern Indian subcontinent some time between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE.[2] He is recognized by adherents as an awakened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end suffering (or dukkha), achieve nirvana, and escape what is seen as a cycle of suffering and rebirth. Two major branches of Buddhism are recognized: Theravada ("The School of the Elders") and Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle"). Theravada—the oldest surviving branch—has a widespread following in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, and Mahayana is found throughout East Asia and includes the traditions of Pure Land, Zen, Nichiren Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Shingon, Tendai and Shinnyo-en. In some classifications Vajrayana, a subcategory of Mahayana, is recognized as a third branch.
  • Unlocking Untapped Value, EPO SME Case Studies on IP Strategy and IP

    Unlocking Untapped Value, EPO SME Case Studies on IP Strategy and IP

    Unlocking untapped value EPO SME case studies on IP strategy and IP management EPO SME CASE STUDIES | FOREWORD Dear readers, A thriving SME sector is widely accepted as one of the building blocks of a compe- titive and sustainable economy. With ambitious ideas and innovative solutions, small and medium-sized enterprises are often attributed with injecting great energy and productivity into both traditional and new sectors. The EPO’s mission is to support such innovators, as well as the European economy as a whole, by providing robust patents and access to published patent information. But if the power of such IP is to be fully exploited, a better understanding needs to be created about how patent protection and information can be used effectively by innovative companies, regardless of their size, sector or location. The EPO has therefore produced this series of case studies to highlight how some SMEs are effectively leveraging the power of patents to help achieve business success. These 12 case studies have been put together to include a cross section of SMEs from across Europe, encompassing 11 of our member states, and ranging in size and sector. They provide comprehensive accounts of the different ways in which IP is playing an integral role in the development of some enterprises. The examples show how SMEs are using patents as a powerful tool to support their corporate strategy and even, in some cases, as the very foundation on which to build their business. For some, patents defend an SME’s technologies in a highly competitive sector, or help it to truly stand apart from other technologies in the field.
  • President's Activities Report SUBMITTED BY

    President's Activities Report SUBMITTED BY

    CA/44/19 Orig.: en Munich, 08.03.2019 SUBJECT: President's activities report SUBMITTED BY: President of the European Patent Office ADDRESSEES: Administrative Council (for information) CA/44/19 e 2018-5940 - I - TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. PERFORMANCE OF THE PATENT GRANTING PROCESS 2 A. WORKLOAD AND PRODUCTION 2 a) Search, examination and opposition 7 b) Early Certainty timeliness 8 B. QUALITY 9 a) User satisfaction 10 b) Quality indicators 11 c) Quality action plans 12 d) Quality management system 14 e) Asian documentation 18 f) Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) 18 g) Patent procedures management documented by QMS 21 h) Streamlining practices and procedures 21 C. RELATIONS WITH USERS 26 a) User support 27 b) User events 27 c) Praktika Extern 2018 28 d) Pan-European Seal Programme 29 e) User feedback 30 f) Communication with applicants 31 III. SOCIAL MATTERS 32 A. SOCIAL DIALOGUE 32 a) Outcomes of discussions with social partners 32 b) Continuous dialogue with staff 33 c) Internal justice system 33 B. RECRUITMENT AND WORKFORCE PLANNING 35 IV. IT AND AUTOMATION PROJECTS 37 A. ITR DELIVERIES FOR THE PGP AND KMS 37 a) Delivering the digital transformation agenda 37 b) Improvements to current tools 38 CA/44/19 e 2018-5940 - II - B. DELIVERIES FOR OTHER AREAS 38 C. IT AUDIT 39 V. BUILDINGS 39 A. NEW MAIN THE HAGUE 39 B. OTHER BUILDING PROJECTS 40 VI. EPN 41 A. CO-OPERATION WITH MEMBER STATES 41 B. EUROPEAN PATENT ACADEMY 42 C. CO-OPERATION WITH EUIPO 43 D. REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE EPO 43 E.
  • How to Use the EPO Template?

    How to Use the EPO Template?

    The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system with a look at CCMT Enrico Luzzatto Senior Advisor, European Patent Academy, EPO, Munich Milan, 10-11October 2018 Contents . About us . Statistics . Granting and publishing patents . Quality patents . Patents for the public . Training and awareness-raising events . The unitary patent . Contact European Patent Office 2 Our mission As the patent office for Europe, we support innovation, competitiveness and economic growth across Europe through a commitment to high quality and efficient services delivered under the European Patent Convention. European Patent Office 3 Our history 1973 Diplomatic Conference in Munich 5 October 1973 Signature of the European Patent Convention (EPC) by 16 countries 1977 Entry into force of the EPC in seven countries Founding of the European Patent Organisation Founding of the European Patent Office 2013 Celebration of 40 years of the EPC 2017 Celebration of 40 years of the EPO European Patent Office 4 Seven founding states in 1977 Belgium • Germany • France Luxembourg • Netherlands Switzerland • United Kingdom European Patent Office 5 ... 17 member states in 1992 ... Belgium • Germany • France Luxembourg • Netherlands Switzerland • United Kingdom Sweden • Italy • Austria Liechtenstein • Greece • Spain Denmark • Monaco • Portugal Ireland European Patent Office 6 ... 32 member states in 2007 ... Belgium • Germany • France Luxembourg • Netherlands Switzerland • United Kingdom Sweden • Italy • Austria Liechtenstein • Greece • Spain Denmark • Monaco • Portugal Ireland • Finland • Cyprus Turkey • Bulgaria • Czech Republic Estonia • Slovakia • Slovenia Hungary • Romania • Poland Iceland • Lithuania • Latvia Malta European Patent Office 7 Today ... an area with some 700m inhabitants 38 European member states Belgium • Germany • France • Luxembourg • Netherlands Switzerland • United Kingdom • Sweden • Italy • Austria Liechtenstein • Greece • Spain • Denmark • Monaco Portugal • Ireland • Finland • Cyprus • Turkey Bulgaria • Czech Rep.