DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Rpc32α, Subunit of the RNA Polymerase III, in a Tumor Model Wiebke Bretting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Study of RPC32α, subunit of the RNA polymerase III, in a tumor model Wiebke Bretting To cite this version: Wiebke Bretting. Study of RPC32α, subunit of the RNA polymerase III, in a tumor model. Human health and pathology. Université de Bordeaux, 2017. English. NNT : 2017BORD0822. tel-02418602 HAL Id: tel-02418602 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02418602 Submitted on 19 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE PRÉSENTÉE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX Ecole doctorale : Science de la vie et de la santé Spécialité : Génétique Par Wiebke BRETTING Study of RPC32α, subunit of the RNA polymerase III, in a tumor model Sous la direction de : Dr. Hélène DUMAY-ODELOT Soutenue le 11 décembre 2017 Membres du jury : Prof. MERLIO, Jean-Philippe Professeur, Université de Bordeaux Président Dr. MEGGETTO-PRADELLE, Fabienne Directrice de recherche, CRCT Rapporteur Dr. ACKER, Joël Chercheur, CEA Saclay Rapporteur Dr. DUMAY-ODELOT, Hélène Maître de conférence, Université de Bordeaux Examinateur Prof. TEICHMANN, Martin Professeur, Université de Bordeaux Invité Abstract The RNA polymerases are key players of transcription. Eukaryotes have three RNA polymerases (I, II and III). The RNA polymerase III (Pol III) has 17 subunits, one of which exists in two alternative forms: RPC32α and RPC32β. Only one of the two forms can be integrated into the enzymes, thus generating either Pol IIIα or Pol IIIβ. While RPC32β is found in all somatic cells, RPC32α is expressed in stem cells and tumor cells. To date nothing is known of their respective roles. Breast cancer is one of the major public health problems, as it is the most common cancer in women. Several types of breast cancers are distinguished, according to the presence or absence of hormonal receptors. Cancers that test negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and that do not overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, are called triple-negative breast cancers. They tend to have a poor prognosis, due to the aggressive nature of the cancer and the lack of targeted therapies. To study the role of RPC32α, a tumor model needed to be identified. In collaboration with Jean-Paul Feugeas (INSERM UMR 1098) a transcriptomic study was performed on 2627 clinical breast tissue samples. The study showed that RPC32α was overexpressed in triple- negative breast cancer, whereas RPC32β was overexpressed in normal tissue. A study on six breast cancer cell lines and one non-tumorigenic line confirmed the results of the transcriptomic study. The breast cancer model was thus validated. A characterization of different breast cancer cell lines showed that other Pol III subunits were not overexpressed in triple-negative breast cancer. The overexpression of RPC32α was therefore not a mere consequence of a Pol III hyperactivity. An analysis of the transcripts synthesized by Pol III showed that overall the Pol III transcript levels were elevated in triple- negative breast cancer compared to other breast cancer subtypes. In order to study the role of RPC32α in tumorigenesis, several RPC32α knock-out cell lines were created using CRISPR-Cas9. The loss of RPC32α did not induce an increase in transcription of the RNAs of RPC32α or RPC32β. This shows that no feed-back loop exists for RPC32α and that the two homologues are not co-regulated. Various Pol III transcripts showed decreased expression levels in the knock-out cell lines. Yet not all transcripts were 1 reduced in the absence of RPC32α. This indicates that some sort of transcription specificity must exist for Pol IIIα and Pol IIIβ. The knock-out cell lines did not show any alterations in their phenotype or growth rates. However, in soft agar assays the knock-out cell lines produced 85% less colonies than the mother cell line. This proves that RPC32α is necessary for tumorigenic growth in vitro. To find out if RPC32α was also necessary for tumorigenic growth in vivo, knock-out and wild type cells were injected into mice. The mice grafted with knock-out cells showed a slowed onset of tumor growth. After six weeks, the mice injected with knock-out cells had tumors half the size of the mice injected with wild type cells. The primary tumor was ablated and mice were tracked for metastasis. Four weeks later, mice injected with RPC32α knock-out cells had 100 times less metastasis than the control group. These results show that RPC32α is necessary for tumorigenic growth in vitro and in vivo. The protein seems also to be implicated in the formation of metastasis, which are one of the greatest problems in cancer treatment today. 2 Résumé Les ARN polymérases sont des acteurs indispensables de la transcription. Chez les eucaryotes il existe trois ARN polymérases (I, II et III). La ARN polymérase III (Pol III) possède 17 sous-unités, dont une qui existe sous deux formes: RPC32α et RPC32β. Seulement une des deux formes peut être intégrée dans la Pol III, créant ainsi deux polymérases différentes Pol IIIα et Pol IIIβ. Alors que RPC32β est présent dans les cellules somatiques, RPC32α est exprimé surtout dans des cellules souches et des cellules tumorales. Aujourd’hui rien n’est connu sur leurs rôles respectifs. Le cancer du sein est un problème majeur de santé publique car c’est le cancer féminin le plus fréquent. Plusieurs types de cancer du sein sont identifiés selon la présence ou absence de certains récepteurs hormonaux. Des cancers qui testent négative pour le récepteur d’œstrogène et de progestérone et qui ne surexpriment pas le récepteur pour les facteurs de croissance épidermiques humains 2 (HER2) sont appelés triple-négative. Ils ont un pronostique peu favorable, due à l’agressivité de ce type de cancer et un manque de thérapie cibles. Pour étudier le rôle de RPC32α il fallait identifier un model tumorale. En collaboration avec Jean-Paul Feugeas (INSERM UMR 1098) une étude transcriptomique a été fait sur 2627 échantillons cliniques de tissus de sein. L’étude montre que RPC32α est surexprimé dans les cancers triple-négative, alors que son homologue RPC32β est surexprimé dans les tissues normaux. Une analyse sur six lignées de cancer du sein et une ligné non-tumorale ont pu confirmer les résultats de l’analyse transcriptomique. Le modèle de cancer du sein a donc été validé. Une caractérisation des différentes lignées de cancer du sein a démontré que d’autres sous- unités de la Pol III n’étaient pas surexprimées dans les cancers triple-négative. La surexpression de RPC32α n’était donc pas une conséquence d’une hyperactivité de la Pol III. Une analyse des transcrits synthétisé par la Pol III a montré que en générale les transcrits de la Pol III étaient plus fortement exprimé dans les cancers triple-négative que dans d’autres cancers. Afin d’étudier l’implication de RPC32α dans les phénomènes de tumorisation, plusieurs lignées cellulaires dépourvues de RPC32alpha ont été créé utilisant la technique CRISPR- CAS9. L’absence de RPC32α n’a pas induit une augmentation de transcription ni de l’ARN de 3 RPC32α, ni de celle de RPC32β. Il n’existe donc pas de boucle de rétroaction pour RPC32α et les deux homologues ne sont pas co-régulés. Plusieurs, mais pas tous les transcrits synthétisé par la Pol III ont une expression fortement baissé dans les lignées mutants. Le fait que pas tous les transcrits ne soit affectés par la perte de RPC32α, indique qu’il existe une spécificité de transcription pour Pol IIIα et Pol IIIβ. Les cellules des linges mutants ne présentaient pas de phénotype différent des cellules mères et la croissance était la même dans toutes les lignées. Par contre les tests de croissance en agar-mou ont révélé que les lignées mutants formaient 85% de moins de colonies, indiquant que RPC32α est nécessaire pour la croissance tumorigénique in vitro. Pour tester l’effet de la perte de RPC32α sur la croissance tumorigénique in vivo, des cellules mutants et des cellules mères ont été injecté dans des souris. Les souris greffées avec des cellules mutantes montrent un départ de tumorisation retardé. Au bout de six semaines elles avaient de tumeurs deux fois plus petit que les souris avec des cellules mères. Après ablation de la tumeur primaire, les souris ont été surveillées pour l’apparition de métastases. Quatre semaines plus tard les souris greffées avec des cellules mutantes avaient 100 fois moins de métastases que les souris contrôles. Ces résultats montrent que RPC32α est nécessaire pour la tumorisation in vitro et in vivo. La protéine semble surtout jouer un rôle dans la formation des métastases, qui sont un des problèmes majeurs dans le traitement des cancers. 4 Rapport du travail de thèse Les ARN polymérases sont des acteurs indispensables de la transcription qui permettent de l’expression des gènes. Chez les eucaryotes il existe trois ARN polymérases nucléaires (I, II et III). L’ARN polymérase III (Pol III) est chargée de la transcription de petits ARN non-codants. Les ARN transcrits par la Pol III sont impliqués dans de nombreux processus cellulaires, tels que la transcription (ARN 7SK, éléments Alu), la transformation des ARN (ARNsn U6, RNase P, ARN MRP), la traduction (ARNr 5S, ARNts) et la maturation des protéines (7SL)... Une activité régulière de l’ARN polymérase III est donc essentielle pour la croissance et la survie de la cellule.
Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary Materials

    DEPs in osteosarcoma cells comparing to osteoblastic cells Biological Process Protein Percentage of Hits metabolic process (GO:0008152) 29.3 29.3% cellular process (GO:0009987) 20.2 20.2% localization (GO:0051179) 9.4 9.4% biological regulation (GO:0065007) 8 8.0% developmental process (GO:0032502) 7.8 7.8% response to stimulus (GO:0050896) 5.6 5.6% cellular component organization (GO:0071840) 5.6 5.6% multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501) 4.4 4.4% immune system process (GO:0002376) 4.2 4.2% biological adhesion (GO:0022610) 2.7 2.7% apoptotic process (GO:0006915) 1.6 1.6% reproduction (GO:0000003) 0.8 0.8% locomotion (GO:0040011) 0.4 0.4% cell killing (GO:0001906) 0.1 0.1% 100.1% Genes 2179Hits 3870 biological adhesion apoptotic process … reproduction (GO:0000003) , 0.8% (GO:0022610) , 2.7% locomotion (GO:0040011) ,… immune system process cell killing (GO:0001906) , 0.1% (GO:0002376) , 4.2% multicellular organismal process (GO:0032501) , metabolic process 4.4% (GO:0008152) , 29.3% cellular component organization (GO:0071840) , 5.6% response to stimulus (GO:0050896), 5.6% developmental process (GO:0032502) , 7.8% biological regulation (GO:0065007) , 8.0% cellular process (GO:0009987) , 20.2% localization (GO:0051179) , 9.
  • Autism Multiplex Family with 16P11.2P12.2 Microduplication Syndrome in Monozygotic Twins and Distal 16P11.2 Deletion in Their Brother

    Autism Multiplex Family with 16P11.2P12.2 Microduplication Syndrome in Monozygotic Twins and Distal 16P11.2 Deletion in Their Brother

    European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 540–546 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/12 www.nature.com/ejhg ARTICLE Autism multiplex family with 16p11.2p12.2 microduplication syndrome in monozygotic twins and distal 16p11.2 deletion in their brother Anne-Claude Tabet1,2,3,4, Marion Pilorge2,3,4, Richard Delorme5,6,Fre´de´rique Amsellem5,6, Jean-Marc Pinard7, Marion Leboyer6,8,9, Alain Verloes10, Brigitte Benzacken1,11,12 and Catalina Betancur*,2,3,4 The pericentromeric region of chromosome 16p is rich in segmental duplications that predispose to rearrangements through non-allelic homologous recombination. Several recurrent copy number variations have been described recently in chromosome 16p. 16p11.2 rearrangements (29.5–30.1 Mb) are associated with autism, intellectual disability (ID) and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Another recognizable but less common microdeletion syndrome in 16p11.2p12.2 (21.4 to 28.5–30.1 Mb) has been described in six individuals with ID, whereas apparently reciprocal duplications, studied by standard cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, have been reported in three patients with autism spectrum disorders. Here, we report a multiplex family with three boys affected with autism, including two monozygotic twins carrying a de novo 16p11.2p12.2 duplication of 8.95 Mb (21.28–30.23 Mb) characterized by single-nucleotide polymorphism array, encompassing both the 16p11.2 and 16p11.2p12.2 regions. The twins exhibited autism, severe ID, and dysmorphic features, including a triangular face, deep-set eyes, large and prominent nasal bridge, and tall, slender build. The eldest brother presented with autism, mild ID, early-onset obesity and normal craniofacial features, and carried a smaller, overlapping 16p11.2 microdeletion of 847 kb (28.40–29.25 Mb), inherited from his apparently healthy father.
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus

    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
  • Proteomics Provides Insights Into the Inhibition of Chinese Hamster V79

    Proteomics Provides Insights Into the Inhibition of Chinese Hamster V79

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Proteomics provides insights into the inhibition of Chinese hamster V79 cell proliferation in the deep underground environment Jifeng Liu1,2, Tengfei Ma1,2, Mingzhong Gao3, Yilin Liu4, Jun Liu1, Shichao Wang2, Yike Xie2, Ling Wang2, Juan Cheng2, Shixi Liu1*, Jian Zou1,2*, Jiang Wu2, Weimin Li2 & Heping Xie2,3,5 As resources in the shallow depths of the earth exhausted, people will spend extended periods of time in the deep underground space. However, little is known about the deep underground environment afecting the health of organisms. Hence, we established both deep underground laboratory (DUGL) and above ground laboratory (AGL) to investigate the efect of environmental factors on organisms. Six environmental parameters were monitored in the DUGL and AGL. Growth curves were recorded and tandem mass tag (TMT) proteomics analysis were performed to explore the proliferative ability and diferentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in V79 cells (a cell line widely used in biological study in DUGLs) cultured in the DUGL and AGL. Parallel Reaction Monitoring was conducted to verify the TMT results. γ ray dose rate showed the most detectable diference between the two laboratories, whereby γ ray dose rate was signifcantly lower in the DUGL compared to the AGL. V79 cell proliferation was slower in the DUGL. Quantitative proteomics detected 980 DAPs (absolute fold change ≥ 1.2, p < 0.05) between V79 cells cultured in the DUGL and AGL. Of these, 576 proteins were up-regulated and 404 proteins were down-regulated in V79 cells cultured in the DUGL. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that seven pathways (e.g.
  • The Conserved Structure of Plant Telomerase RNA Provides the Missing Link for an Evolutionary Pathway from Ciliates to Humans

    The Conserved Structure of Plant Telomerase RNA Provides the Missing Link for an Evolutionary Pathway from Ciliates to Humans

    The conserved structure of plant telomerase RNA provides the missing link for an evolutionary pathway from ciliates to humans Jiarui Songa, Dhenugen Logeswaranb,1, Claudia Castillo-Gonzáleza,1, Yang Lib, Sreyashree Bosea, Behailu Birhanu Aklilua, Zeyang Mac,d, Alexander Polkhovskiya,e, Julian J.-L. Chenb,2, and Dorothy E. Shippena,2 aDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; bSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287; cNational Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, 100193 Beijing, China; dCollege of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, 100193 Beijing, China; and eCenter of Life Sciences, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205 Moscow, Russian Federation Edited by Thomas R. Cech, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, and approved October 24, 2019 (received for review September 4, 2019) Telomerase is essential for maintaining telomere integrity. Although transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III) (6, 7). The La-related telomerase function is widely conserved, the integral telomerase protein P65 in Tetrahymena recognizes the 3′ poly-U tail of TR RNA (TR) that provides a template for telomeric DNA synthesis has and bends the RNA to facilitate telomerase RNP assembly (8, 9). diverged dramatically. Nevertheless, TR molecules retain 2 highly In contrast, fungi maintain much larger TR molecules (900 to conserved structural domains critical for catalysis: a template- 2,400 nt) that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) (3). proximal pseudoknot (PK) structure and a downstream stem-loop The 3′ end maturation of fungal TRs requires components of the structure. Here we introduce the authentic TR from the plant canonical snRNA biogenesis pathway and results in RNP assembly Arabidopsis thaliana, called AtTR, identified through next-generation sequencing of RNAs copurifying with Arabidopsis TERT.
  • Supplemental Table 1. Complete Gene Lists and GO Terms from Figure 3C

    Supplemental Table 1. Complete Gene Lists and GO Terms from Figure 3C

    Supplemental Table 1. Complete gene lists and GO terms from Figure 3C. Path 1 Genes: RP11-34P13.15, RP4-758J18.10, VWA1, CHD5, AZIN2, FOXO6, RP11-403I13.8, ARHGAP30, RGS4, LRRN2, RASSF5, SERTAD4, GJC2, RHOU, REEP1, FOXI3, SH3RF3, COL4A4, ZDHHC23, FGFR3, PPP2R2C, CTD-2031P19.4, RNF182, GRM4, PRR15, DGKI, CHMP4C, CALB1, SPAG1, KLF4, ENG, RET, GDF10, ADAMTS14, SPOCK2, MBL1P, ADAM8, LRP4-AS1, CARNS1, DGAT2, CRYAB, AP000783.1, OPCML, PLEKHG6, GDF3, EMP1, RASSF9, FAM101A, STON2, GREM1, ACTC1, CORO2B, FURIN, WFIKKN1, BAIAP3, TMC5, HS3ST4, ZFHX3, NLRP1, RASD1, CACNG4, EMILIN2, L3MBTL4, KLHL14, HMSD, RP11-849I19.1, SALL3, GADD45B, KANK3, CTC- 526N19.1, ZNF888, MMP9, BMP7, PIK3IP1, MCHR1, SYTL5, CAMK2N1, PINK1, ID3, PTPRU, MANEAL, MCOLN3, LRRC8C, NTNG1, KCNC4, RP11, 430C7.5, C1orf95, ID2-AS1, ID2, GDF7, KCNG3, RGPD8, PSD4, CCDC74B, BMPR2, KAT2B, LINC00693, ZNF654, FILIP1L, SH3TC1, CPEB2, NPFFR2, TRPC3, RP11-752L20.3, FAM198B, TLL1, CDH9, PDZD2, CHSY3, GALNT10, FOXQ1, ATXN1, ID4, COL11A2, CNR1, GTF2IP4, FZD1, PAX5, RP11-35N6.1, UNC5B, NKX1-2, FAM196A, EBF3, PRRG4, LRP4, SYT7, PLBD1, GRASP, ALX1, HIP1R, LPAR6, SLITRK6, C16orf89, RP11-491F9.1, MMP2, B3GNT9, NXPH3, TNRC6C-AS1, LDLRAD4, NOL4, SMAD7, HCN2, PDE4A, KANK2, SAMD1, EXOC3L2, IL11, EMILIN3, KCNB1, DOK5, EEF1A2, A4GALT, ADGRG2, ELF4, ABCD1 Term Count % PValue Genes regulation of pathway-restricted GDF3, SMAD7, GDF7, BMPR2, GDF10, GREM1, BMP7, LDLRAD4, SMAD protein phosphorylation 9 6.34 1.31E-08 ENG pathway-restricted SMAD protein GDF3, SMAD7, GDF7, BMPR2, GDF10, GREM1, BMP7, LDLRAD4, phosphorylation
  • WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT

    WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT

    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/079361 Al 25 April 2019 (25.04.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, C12Q 1/68 (2018.01) A61P 31/18 (2006.01) DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, C12Q 1/70 (2006.01) HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (21) International Application Number: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, PCT/US2018/056167 OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (22) International Filing Date: SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 16 October 2018 (16. 10.2018) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, (30) Priority Data: UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, 62/573,025 16 October 2017 (16. 10.2017) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, ΓΕ , IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (71) Applicant: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, TECHNOLOGY [US/US]; 77 Massachusetts Avenue, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (US).
  • Mir-17-92 Fine-Tunes MYC Expression and Function to Ensure

    Mir-17-92 Fine-Tunes MYC Expression and Function to Ensure

    ARTICLE Received 31 Mar 2015 | Accepted 22 Sep 2015 | Published 10 Nov 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9725 OPEN miR-17-92 fine-tunes MYC expression and function to ensure optimal B cell lymphoma growth Marija Mihailovich1, Michael Bremang1, Valeria Spadotto1, Daniele Musiani1, Elena Vitale1, Gabriele Varano2,w, Federico Zambelli3, Francesco M. Mancuso1,w, David A. Cairns1,w, Giulio Pavesi3, Stefano Casola2 & Tiziana Bonaldi1 The synergism between c-MYC and miR-17-19b, a truncated version of the miR-17-92 cluster, is well-documented during tumor initiation. However, little is known about miR-17-19b function in established cancers. Here we investigate the role of miR-17-19b in c-MYC-driven lymphomas by integrating SILAC-based quantitative proteomics, transcriptomics and 30 untranslated region (UTR) analysis upon miR-17-19b overexpression. We identify over one hundred miR-17-19b targets, of which 40% are co-regulated by c-MYC. Downregulation of a new miR-17/20 target, checkpoint kinase 2 (Chek2), increases the recruitment of HuR to c- MYC transcripts, resulting in the inhibition of c-MYC translation and thus interfering with in vivo tumor growth. Hence, in established lymphomas, miR-17-19b fine-tunes c-MYC activity through a tight control of its function and expression, ultimately ensuring cancer cell homeostasis. Our data highlight the plasticity of miRNA function, reflecting changes in the mRNA landscape and 30 UTR shortening at different stages of tumorigenesis. 1 Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Adamello 16, Milan 20139, Italy. 2 Units of Genetics of B cells and lymphomas, IFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan 20139, Italy.
  • Role and Regulation of the P53-Homolog P73 in the Transformation of Normal Human Fibroblasts

    Role and Regulation of the P53-Homolog P73 in the Transformation of Normal Human Fibroblasts

    Role and regulation of the p53-homolog p73 in the transformation of normal human fibroblasts Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Lars Hofmann aus Aschaffenburg Würzburg 2007 Eingereicht am Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Dr. Martin J. Müller Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael P. Schön Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Georg Krohne Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig angefertigt und keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel und Quellen verwendet habe. Diese Arbeit wurde weder in gleicher noch in ähnlicher Form in einem anderen Prüfungsverfahren vorgelegt. Ich habe früher, außer den mit dem Zulassungsgesuch urkundlichen Graden, keine weiteren akademischen Grade erworben und zu erwerben gesucht. Würzburg, Lars Hofmann Content SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ IV ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Molecular basics of cancer .......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Early research on tumorigenesis ................................................................................. 3 1.3. Developing
  • Supplementary Material Computational Prediction of SARS

    Supplementary Material Computational Prediction of SARS

    Supplementary_Material Computational prediction of SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs and their putative host targets Sheet_1 List of potential stem-loop structures in SARS-CoV-2 genome as predicted by VMir. Rank Name Start Apex Size Score Window Count (Absolute) Direct Orientation 1 MD13 2801 2864 125 243.8 61 2 MD62 11234 11286 101 211.4 49 4 MD136 27666 27721 104 205.6 119 5 MD108 21131 21184 110 204.7 210 9 MD132 26743 26801 119 188.9 252 19 MD56 9797 9858 128 179.1 59 26 MD139 28196 28233 72 170.4 133 28 MD16 2934 2974 76 169.9 71 43 MD103 20002 20042 80 159.3 403 46 MD6 1489 1531 86 156.7 171 51 MD17 2981 3047 131 152.8 38 87 MD4 651 692 75 140.3 46 95 MD7 1810 1872 121 137.4 58 116 MD140 28217 28252 72 133.8 62 122 MD55 9712 9758 96 132.5 49 135 MD70 13171 13219 93 130.2 131 164 MD95 18782 18820 79 124.7 184 173 MD121 24086 24135 99 123.1 45 176 MD96 19046 19086 75 123.1 179 196 MD19 3197 3236 76 120.4 49 200 MD86 17048 17083 73 119.8 428 223 MD75 14534 14600 137 117 51 228 MD50 8824 8870 94 115.8 79 234 MD129 25598 25642 89 115.6 354 Reverse Orientation 6 MR61 19088 19132 88 197.8 271 10 MR72 23563 23636 148 188.8 286 11 MR11 3775 3844 136 185.1 116 12 MR94 29532 29582 94 184.6 271 15 MR43 14973 15028 109 183.9 226 27 MR14 4160 4206 89 170 241 34 MR35 11734 11792 111 164.2 37 52 MR5 1603 1652 89 152.7 118 53 MR57 18089 18132 101 152.7 139 94 MR8 2804 2864 122 137.4 38 107 MR58 18474 18508 72 134.9 237 117 MR16 4506 4540 72 133.8 311 120 MR34 10010 10048 82 132.7 245 133 MR7 2534 2578 90 130.4 75 146 MR79 24766 24808 75 127.9 59 150 MR65 21528 21576 99 127.4 83 180 MR60 19016 19049 70 122.5 72 187 MR51 16450 16482 75 121 363 190 MR80 25687 25734 96 120.6 75 198 MR64 21507 21544 70 120.3 35 206 MR41 14500 14542 84 119.2 94 218 MR84 26840 26894 108 117.6 94 Sheet_2 List of stable stem-loop structures based on MFE.
  • Termination of RNA Polymerase II Transcription by the 5’-3’ Exonuclease Xrn2

    Termination of RNA Polymerase II Transcription by the 5’-3’ Exonuclease Xrn2

    TERMINATION OF RNA POLYMERASE II TRANSCRIPTION BY THE 5’-3’ EXONUCLEASE XRN2 by MICHAEL ANDRES CORTAZAR OSORIO B.S., Universidad del Valle – Colombia, 2011 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Molecular Biology Program 2018 This thesis for the Doctor of Philosophy degree by Michael Andrés Cortázar Osorio has been approved for the Molecular Biology Program by Mair Churchill, Chair Richard Davis Jay Hesselberth Thomas Blumenthal James Goodrich David Bentley, Advisor Date: Aug 17, 2018 ii Cortázar Osorio, Michael Andrés (Ph.D., Molecular Biology) Termination of RNA polymerase II transcription by the 5’-3’ exonuclease Xrn2 Thesis directed by Professor David L. Bentley ABSTRACT Termination of transcription occurs when RNA polymerase (pol) II dissociates from the DNA template and releases a newly-made mRNA molecule. Interestingly, an active debate fueled by conflicting reports over the last three decades is still open on which of the two main models of termination of RNA polymerase II transcription does in fact operate at 3’ ends of genes. The torpedo model indicates that the 5’-3’ exonuclease Xrn2 targets the nascent transcript for degradation after cleavage at the polyA site and chases pol II for termination. In contrast, the allosteric model asserts that transcription through the polyA signal induces a conformational change of the elongation complex and converts it into a termination-competent complex. In this thesis, I propose a unified allosteric-torpedo mechanism. Consistent with a polyA site-dependent conformational change of the elongation complex, I found that pol II transitions at the polyA site into a mode of slow transcription elongation that is accompanied by loss of Spt5 phosphorylation in the elongation complex.
  • Whole-Genome Expression Analysis of Mammalian-Wide Interspersed

    Whole-Genome Expression Analysis of Mammalian-Wide Interspersed

    Dna Research, 2017, 24(1), 59–69 doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw048 Advance Access Publication Date: 17 December 2016 Full Paper Full Paper Whole-genome expression analysis of mammalian-wide interspersed repeat elements in human cell lines Davide Carnevali1, Anastasia Conti1,†, Matteo Pellegrini2 and Giorgio Dieci1,* 1Department of Life Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy, and 2Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 723, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. þ39 0521 905649. Fax. þ39 0521 905151. Email: [email protected] †Present address: The San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-TIGET), Milano, Italy Edited by Dr. Minoru Ko Received 13 August 2016; Accepted 9 October 2016 Abstract With more than 500,000 copies, mammalian-wide interspersed repeats (MIRs), a sub-group of SINEs, represent 2.5% of the human genome and one of the most numerous family of poten- tial targets for the RNA polymerase (Pol) III transcription machinery. Since MIR elements ceased to amplify 130 myr ago, previous studies primarily focused on their genomic impact, while the issue of their expression has not been extensively addressed. We applied a dedicated bioin- formatic pipeline to ENCODE RNA-Seq datasets of seven human cell lines and, for the first time, we were able to define the Pol III-driven MIR transcriptome at single-locus resolution. While the majority of Pol III-transcribed MIR elements are cell-specific, we discovered a small set of ubiquitously transcribed MIRs mapping within Pol II-transcribed genes in antisense orien- tation that could influence the expression of the overlapping gene.