Sunday Working (Scotland) Bill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Sunday Working (Scotland) Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Scotland Office with the consent of David Cairns, the Member in Charge of the Bill, will be published separately as Bill 16– EN. Bill 16 53/2 Sunday Working (Scotland) Bill 1 A BILL TO Make provision as to the rights of shop workers and betting workers under the law of Scotland in relation to Sunday working; and for connected purposes. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Sunday working: shop and betting workers in Scotland (1) The Employment Rights Act 1996 (c. 18) is amended as follows. (2) In Section 36 (which provides for “protected” shop workers and betting workers)— (a) in subsection (7), at the beginning there is inserted “Subject to 5 subsection (8),”; and (b) after subsection (7) there is added— “(8) In any provision of this Act which applies to Scotland by virtue of section 1(5) of the Sunday Working (Scotland) Act 2003 (extension to Scotland of provisions which refer to shop 10 workers and betting workers), “the relevant commencement date” means, in relation to Scotland, the date on which that section came into force.”. (3) In section 232 (which relates to shop workers)— (a) in subsection (2), the words “in England or Wales” are repealed. 15 (b) in subsection (7)— (i) in paragraph (a), after the words “intoxicating liquor” there is inserted “(in Scotland, alcoholic liquor)”; and (ii) at the end there is added “and “alcoholic liquor” the same meaning as in the Licensing (Scotland) Act 1976.”. 20 (4) In section 233 (which relates to betting workers), in each of paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (2), the words “in England or Wales” are repealed. (5) In section 244(2) (which provides that the provisions of the Act which refer to shop workers and betting workers extend to England and Wales only), for the Bill 16 53/2 2 Sunday Working (Scotland) Bill words “The provisions of this Act which refer to shop workers and betting workers” there is substituted “Sections 36(2) and (4), 37(1) and (5), 38 and 39”. 2 Transitory, transitional and saving provisions The Secretary of State may by order made by statutory instrument make any transitory, transitional or saving provision which he considers necessary or 5 expedient for the purposes of, in consequence of or for giving full effect to any provision of this Act. 3 Commencement This Act (except this section and section 4) comes into force on such day as the Secretary of State may by order made by statutory instrument appoint. 10 4 Short title This Act may be cited as the Sunday Working (Scotland) Act 2003. Sunday Working (Scotland) Bill A BILL To make provision as to the rights of shop workers and betting workers under the law of Scotland in relation to Sunday working; and for connected purposes. Presented by David Cairns supported by Mr Malcolm Savidge, Sir Nicholas Winterton, Miss Anne Begg, Jim Sheridan, Angus Robertson, Anne Picking, Mr Tom Clarke, John Robertson, Sir Robert Smith, Ann McKechin and Mr Edward Leigh Ordered, by The House of Commons, to be Printed, 11th December 2002 © Parliamentary copyright House of Commons 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St. Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON: THE STATIONERY OFFICE Printed in the United Kingdom by The Stationery Office Limited £x.xx net Bill 16 (xxxxxx) 53/2 xxxbarxxx .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Environmental Crime: Wildlife Crime
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Environmental Crime: Wildlife Crime Twelfth Report of Session 2003–04 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Wednesday 15 September 2004 HC 605 Published on Thursday 7 October 2004 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) (Chairman) Mr Gregory Barker MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Mr Harold Best MP (Labour, Leeds North West) Mr Colin Challen MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Mr David Chaytor MP (Labour, Bury North) Mrs Helen Clark MP (Labour, Peterborough) Sue Doughty MP (Liberal Democrat, Guildford) Mr Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh) Mr John Horam MP (Conservative, Orpington) Mr John McWilliam MP (Labour, Blaydon) Mr Elliot Morley MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) Mr Malcolm Savidge MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Mr Simon Thomas MP (Plaid Cymru, Ceredigion) Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally Standing Order No. 152A. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
[Show full text]
Devolution of Power in England, Scotland and Wales
Devolution of Power in England, Scotland and Wales Executive Council Statement to the 2003 Annual Delegate Meeting ContentsContents Introduction Page 2 Background Page 3 Voting for Devolution Page 4 The Scottish and Welsh General Elections Page 7 Usdaw’s General Election Campaign Page 10 Labour’s Policies for Scotland Page 12 Labour’s Policies for Wales Page 13 Campaigning after the Scottish and Welsh General Elections Page 14 English Regional Devolution Page 19 Your Region, Your Choice: The Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill Page 20 Conclusion Page 23 Appendices Page 24 G Usdaw’s Political Co-ordinators Page 24 G Application Form to Join the Labour Party Page 25 G Application for Constituency Labour Party Affiliation Fees Page 26 1 Devolution of Power in England, Scotland and Wales IntroductionIntroduction When the Labour Party promised the offer of devolved government to Scotland and Wales in the 1997 manifesto, no one would have guessed that within six months referenda would have been won in both countries and the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly set up and elected 18 months later. But devolution to Scotland and Wales has been delivered and the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly are already making a difference to our members’ lives. The elections in Scotland and Wales on 1 May 2003 will mark another milestone when the Parliament and Assembly are elected for another term in office. But those elections will be very important ones. The people of Scotland and Wales have the power to decide whether they want the Parliament and Assembly to continue to concentrate on improving public services and the way of life, or do they want them to focus on fighting for more power to be devolved? This paper sets out the choices for our members: the powers of the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly, the difference that they can make for our members and the ways we can use these powerful devolved institutions to fight for the issues that matter to us.
[Show full text]
Learning the Sustainability Lesson
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Learning the Sustainability Lesson Tenth Report of Session 2002–03 Volume I 472-I House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Learning the Sustainability Lesson Tenth Report of Session 2002-03 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 16th July 2003 472-I Published on Thursday 31 July 2003 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) (Chairman) Mr Gregory Barker MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Mr Harold Best MP (Labour, Leeds North West) Mr Colin Challen MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Mr David Chaytor MP (Labour, Bury North) Mrs Helen Clark MP (Labour, Peterborough) Sue Doughty MP (Liberal Democrat, Guildford) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh) Mr John Horam MP (Conservative, Orpington) Mr Jon Owen Jones MP (Labour, Cardiff Central) Mr Ian Lucas MP (Labour, Wrexham) Rt hon. Michael Meacher MP (Labour, Oldham West & Royton) Mr Malcolm Savidge MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Mr Simon Thomas MP (Plaid Cymru, Ceredigion) Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally Standing Order No.
[Show full text]
The International Challenge of Climate Change: UK Leadership in the G8 & EU
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee The International Challenge of Climate Change: UK Leadership in the G8 & EU Fourth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed Wednesday 16 March 2005 HC 105 Published on Sunday 27 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £26.00 The Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) (Chairman) Mr Gregory Barker MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Mr Harold Best MP (Labour, Leeds North West) Mr Colin Challen MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Mr David Chaytor MP (Labour, Bury North) Mrs Helen Clark MP (Labour, Peterborough) Sue Doughty MP (Liberal Democrat, Guildford) Mr Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) Mr Mark Francois MP (Conservative, Rayleigh) Mr John Horam MP (Conservative, Orpington) Mr John McWilliam MP (Labour, Blaydon) Mr Elliot Morley MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) Mr Malcolm Savidge MP (Labour, Aberdeen North) Mr Simon Thomas MP (Plaid Cymru, Ceredigion) Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally Standing Order No.
[Show full text]
Anaesthesia Points West
Anaesthesia Points West Autumn 2OO7 rssN 0265-9212 THE SOCIETY OF ANAESTHETISTS OF THE SOUTH WESTERN REGION PRESIDENT: DR JOHN CARTER Frenchay VICE PRESIDENT: DRNEVILLE GOODMAN Southmead PRESIDENT-ELECT: SIRPETERSIMPSON Frenchay IIONORARY SECRETARY: DRE. MORRIS Southmead SECRETARY TO HON. SECRETARY: Ms K. PRYS-ROBERTS UBHT HONORARY TREASI]RER: DRA. BURGESS Plymouth LOCAL ORGAMSERS: DR S. SHINDE Frenchay (Jubilee meeting) DRA. BURGESS Plymouth/Guernsey TRAINEE REPRESENTATIVES: DR S. CARTY South West School DRI. THOMAS Bristol School EDITORIAL COMMITTEE: DRJ. PITTMAN Editor, Exeter DRF. DONALD Assistant Editor, Southmead Ms K. WILKINSON/ Secretaries to Editor, Ms G. HUSBAND Exeter WEBSITE: DRK. SPOONER Cardiff www.saswr.co.uk ANAESTHESIA POINTS WEST CONTENTS Vol.40 No.2 Autumn,2007 Page Committee Members I Contents 2 Editorial Dr.I Pittman J Future Meetings of the Society 4 News of the West 5 Examination Successes and Honours t7 Society Takes Budapest By Storm Dr E Morris l9 A Survey ofAnaesthetic Practice for Dr G Werrett 24 Carotid Endarterectomy in the Southwest Dr N Preston Region of the UK Dr Q Milner Epidural Analgesia in a New Zealand Dr G Werrett 28 Tertiary Hospital before and after Dr H Horton publication of the MASTER study - Dr R Craig Evidence Based Medicine in action? Dr R French Michael Turstall andthe Development of DrTDawes 32 Entonox MMC & MTAS - a Trainer's View Dr C Johnson 36 Clinical Systems Engineering DrN Williams 4t SASWR Members And Anaesthesia In Dr B McCormick The Developing World Dr I Wilson 47 Reflections on
[Show full text]
General Elections in the Post-Devolution Period: Press Accounts of the 2001 and 2005 Campaigns in Scotland and England
General elections in the post-devolution period: press accounts of the 2001 and 2005 campaigns in Scotland and England Marina Dekavalla Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Stirling Department of Film, Media and Journalism December 2009 © Marina Dekavalla 2009 Abstract This thesis examines and compares newspaper coverage of the first two general elections after Scottish devolution, looking at both the Scottish and English/UK press. By considering the coverage of a major political event which affects both countries, it contributes to debates regarding the performance of the Scottish press within an arguably distinct Scottish public sphere as well as that of the press in England within a post-devolution context. The research is based on a content analysis of all the coverage of the 2001 and 2005 elections in seven Scottish and five English and UK daily morning newspapers, a critical discourse analysis of a sample of the coverage of the most mentioned issues in each campaign and a small set of interviews with Scottish political editors. As a framework for its analysis, this thesis focuses on theories of national identity and deliberative democracy in the media. It finds that the coverage of elections in the two countries has a similar issue agenda, however Scottish newspapers appear less interested in the UK aspect of the elections and include debates on Scottish affairs which are discussed in isolation, within an exclusively Scottish mediated space. These issues are constructed as particularly relevant to a Scottish readership through references to the nation, inclusive modes of address to the reader and the inclusion of exclusively Scottish sources, which contrast with the Scottish coverage of “UK” issues.
[Show full text]
The Role of the Crown in the Iraq War
This is a repository copy of ‘Fountain of Honour’? The Role of the Crown in the Iraq War. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/136664/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Moosavian, R (2013) ‘Fountain of Honour’? The Role of the Crown in the Iraq War. Kings Law Journal, 24 (3). pp. 289-315. ISSN 0961-5768 https://doi.org/10.5235/09615768.24.3.289 This article is protected by copyright. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in King's Law Journal on 20 Nov 2013, available online: https://doi.org/10.5235/09615768.24.3.289 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ ‘Fountain of Honour’? The Role of Crown in the Iraq War [final] Rebecca Moosavian, School of Law, Northumbria University WORD COUNT – 8, 656 words (Excluding footnotes & abstracts) ABSTRACT [152 words] This article investigates the Crown within the British constitution and gauges its influence upon the decision to deploy troops in Iraq.
[Show full text]
Comprehensive Future Newsletter 4
Newsletter February 2004 Patron Fiona Millar Chair David Chaytor MP Secretary • Sign the Comprehensive Future declaration Margaret Tulloch Comprehensive Future was launched with the support of many local councillors, Labour MPs, Labour Group Leaders, academics and trade union leaders. We Treasurer are working to maximise the number of Constituency Labour Parties supporting Malcolm Horne the Comprehensive Future Declaration (text overleaf). Has this been discussed Gen Sec SEA at your monthly CLP or branch meeting? Please put this on the agenda at your next CLP. Please also copy and distribute the enclosed form and send your personal declaration in to Comprehensive Future. • Respond to the Big Conversation Please ensure that you respond as soon as possible to the Prime Minister’s Big Conversation calling for an end to selection. You can phone 0870 590 0200, write or email from the web site www.bigconversation.org.uk If you can, please copy your response to Comprehensive Future. • Get your MP to sign Early Day Motion 409 Over 100 Labour MPs have now signed up to Early Day Motion 409 calling for an end to selection by ability in England’s secondary schools. Is yours one of them? Check the list overleaf. If not please phone, email or write immediately to your Member of Parliament asking them to sign EDM 409. If they are unwilling or ineligible to sign, ask them to state clearly if they support selective admissions policies in secondary schools and whether they think the current policy of ending selection only by local parental ballots is workable. • In Manchester on March 13th? Come to our fringe meeting Come to our fringe meeting No Selection under a Labour Government? at the Labour Party Spring Conference on Saturday 13th March, at 1.15pm in the French Room, Crowne Plaza Midland Hotel.
[Show full text]
General Election Results, 7 June 2001
RESEARCH PAPER 01/54 General Election results, [REVISED EDITION] 18 JUNE 2001 7 June 2001 This research paper summarises the results of the General Election held on 7 June 2001. Results are given nationally, by region, by county and for individual constituencies. In this revised edition of the paper the results are consistent with those produced by the Electoral Commission. The tables in this paper are derived from the Library’s election database which can be used to produce further analyses. Members requiring more information should contact the Social & General Statistics Section. Bryn Morgan SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 01/39 The International Criminal Court Bill [HL] [Bill 70 of 2000-2001] 29.03.01 01/40 The Election Publications Bill [HL] [Bill 41 of 2000-2001] 29.03.01 01/41 The Adoption Bill [Bill 16 of 2000-2001] 29.03.01 01/42 Economic Indicators 02.04.01 01/43 Parliamentary Pay and Allowances: current rates 03.04.01 01/44 The Elections Bill [Bill 80 of 2000-2001] 03.04.01 01/45 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2001 11.04.01 01/46 Taxation of Charities 12.04.01 01/47 Rural Rate Relief 30.04.01 01/48 Economic Indicators 01.05.01 01/49 The Treaty of Nice and the future of Europe debate 01.05.01 01/50 European Security and Defence Policy: Nice and beyond 02.05.01 01/51 The Burden of Taxation 10.05.01 01/52 Road fuel prices and taxation 11.05.01 01/53 Unemployment by Constituency, April 2001 16.05.01 Research Papers are available as PDF files: • to members of the general public on the Parliamentary web site, URL: http://www.parliament.uk • within Parliament to users of the Parliamentary Intranet, URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff.
[Show full text]
J2/02/18/A Justice 2 Committee
J2/02/18/A JUSTICE 2 COMMITTEE AGENDA 18th Meeting, 2002 (Session 1) Wednesday 8 May 2002 The Committee will meet at 10.00 am in the Chamber, Assembly Hall, The Mound, Edinburgh. 1. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill: The Committee will take oral evidence on the general principles of the Bill at Stage 1 from— Scottish Executive officials: Jane Richardson, Jo Knox, Elizabeth Carmichael, Sharon Grant, Alan Quinn, Gillian Thompson, Stephen Sadler, Jan Marshall, Charles Garland, Gordon McNicoll. 2. Public petition: The Committee will consider petition PE490 by Jacqueline Reid on sentencing of convicted paedophiles. 3. Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill: The Committee will consider written evidence received and consider who to invite to give oral evidence on the Bill at Stage 1. Gillian Baxendine Clerk to the Committee, Tel 85054 The following papers are enclosed for this meeting: Items 1 and 3 – Criminal Justice Bill Adviser paper on written submissions J2/02/18/1 Note from Executive on key issues in the Bill J2/02/18/2 Letter of 29 April from Minister for Justice on amendments J2/02/18/3 Submissions received commenting solely on section 43 (Children) J2/02/18/4 Other written submissions J2/02/18/5 [The Committee has received over 260 submissions. Submissions received as at 2 May are being circulated with this agenda to J2 members. Submissions received after this date will be circulated in due course. Public submissions will appear on the website. A set will be made available for any MSP or member of staff to consult in Document Supply Centre, PHQ.
[Show full text]
'We Must Deliver Results'
News and comment on the United Nations and UNA-UK Summer 2008 | £3.00 NE W WORLD ‘WE MUST DELIVER RESULTS ’ BAN KI-MOON’S SPEECH TO UNA-UK page 11 McCain: his Clusters: bin th e Ethiopia: facing new club bombs a food crisis page 9 page 18 page 24 PLUS Karadzic on trial page 5 ‘Cash for Kim’ page 6 Iraqi refugees page 7 Maternal mortality and human rights page 10 Sexual abuse by peacekeepers page 16 Climate change conferences page 22 YPN interview: documenting Darfur page 32 UNA-UK UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THE UK | 3 Whitehall Court, London SW1A 2EL | www.una.org.uk YOUR MP should be actively holding the government to account in fulfilling the promises it has made on the world stage. This September world leaders will convene to renew the push to achieve the UN Millennium Development Goals by 2015. In December the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights will turn 60. The end of 2009 marks the deadline for the UN to broker a new global deal to rein in climate change. And between now and 2010 states will be prepar - ing for a major conference at the UN on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which commits states to the ultimate goal of complete nuclear disarmament. LOBBY FOR THE UN 08-09 is a chance for you to tell your MP about these challenges, their solutions and their impact on the security and well-being of Britons. LAUNCH EVENT : Foreign Press Association 4pm to 5.30pm on Thursday, 23 October The launch event will feature speakers and free resources.
[Show full text]
Getting a Fair Deal for British Muslims Time to Make a Difference
Time to Make a Difference Getting a Fair Deal for British Muslims Time to Make a Difference ext year, the Government is going to pass The new laws will simply reinforce present N legislation, in line with European law, to inequalities in British law and society. Currently, protect people from religious discrimination in Muslims do not benefit from the Race Relations employment. This is good news because it Act 1976 or the more recent Race Relations protects Muslims and others against unfair (Amendment) Act 2000, which requires certain dismissal or discriminatory practices in the public bodies, like the police, to: workplace. However, it leaves Muslims open to religious discrimination in other areas of life. prohibit direct and indirect discrimination Under British law, Muslims will not get protection in the performance of their public duties from religious discrimination in the areas of: take positive steps to eliminate discrimination and promote equality social security and health care education Whilst some faith communities in Britain, like public provisions Sikhs and Jews, rightfully enjoy the above e.g., housing protection and provisions of law, Muslims are social advantages unjustly denied access to them. This is because e.g., housing benefit, student case law under the above Acts currently defines maintenance grants and loans, etc. ‘racial group’ in a way that includes single ethnic religious groups like Jews or Sikhs but excludes Muslims. In a democracy such as ours, where you could make sure that your elected it is simply unacceptable that Muslims should Member of Parliament would enjoy any less protection from discrimination represent your interests as a Muslim.
[Show full text]