DOCSLIB.ORG

Clique Cover of Graphs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clique Cover of Graphs Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 87, 4301 - 4307 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.45343 Clique Cover of Graphs Frederick S. Gella Department of Mathematics, Institute of Arts and Sciences Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines Rosalio G. Artes, Jr. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science and Mathematics Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology Andres Bonifacio Avenue, Tibanga, 9200 Iligan City, Philippines Copyright c 2014 Frederick S. Gella and Rosalio G. Artes, Jr. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unre- stricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Let G be a graph. A clique of a graph G is a nonempty subset S of V (G) such that S induces a complete graph. A family of cliques of G is a clique cover of G if for every u ∈ V (G) there exists S ∈such that u ∈ S. The clique covering number of G, denoted by cc(G), is given by cc(G) = min{|| : is a clique cover G}. For a graph G, the family of singleton subsets of V (G) is a clique cover of G. Hence, the order of a graph is an upper bound for its clique covering number. The clique covering number of a graph is equal to its order if and only if it is an empty graph. The clique covering number of a graph is equal to its size if and only if it is a star. Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C30 Keywords: clique, clique cover, clique covering number 1 Introduction Covering theory in graphs has been studied by a number of graph theorists. Various types of covering a graph such as vertex covering, edge covering, clique 4302 Frederick S. Gella and Rosalio G. Artes, Jr. covering, tree covering, forest covering, and path triple covering has been de- fined. In this study, the author focused mainly on the clique covering of a graph. Clique covering was first investigated by Pullman [6]. He presented linear algorithms for computing the minimum number of complete subgraphs needed to cover or partition the edges of any simple graph G with maximal degree less than 5. Artes [1] used the concepts of edge cover and edge covering number of graphs. He obtained the following theorem involving the edge covering number ec(G) and the clique covering number cc(G) of a graph G: For any graph G without isolated vertices, cc(G) ≤ ec(G) and if G contains no complete subgraph of order at least 3, then ec(G)=cc(G). Let G be a graph. A clique of a graph G is a nonempty subset S of V (G) such that S induces a complete graph. A family of cliques of G is a clique cover of G if for every u ∈ V (G) there exists S ∈such that u ∈ S. The clique covering number of G, denoted by cc(G), is given by cc(G) = min{|| : is a clique cover G}. Let G be graph without isolated vertices. An edge in G is said to cover the vertices with which it is incident. A subset U of E(G)isanedge cover of G if for each vertex v ∈ V (G) there is an edge in U which covers v. The edge covering number of G is given by ec(G) = min{|U| : U is an edge cover of G}. 2 Preliminary Results This section presents some basic results and observations which will be useful in establishing the clique covering number of some graphs. Theorem 2.1 The following hold: (a) For any graph G, the family = {{u} : u ∈ V (G)} is a clique cover of G. (b) For any graph G without isolated vertices, the family = {{u, v} : uv ∈ E(G)} is a clique cover of G. (c) For any graph G, cc(G) ≥ 1. (d) If G1 and G2 are isomorphic, then cc(G1)=cc(G2). Theorem 2.2 Let G be a graph of order n. Then 1 ≤ cc(G) ≤ n. Clique cover of graphs 4303 Proof : This result follows from Theorem 2.1(c) and Theorem 2.1(a). Theorem 2.3 Let G be a connected graph of order n ≥ 1. Then cc(G)=1 ∼ if and only if G = Kn. ∼ Proof :(⇐) Assume that G = Kn. By Theorem 2.1(c), cc(Kn) ≥ 1. Hence, it suffices to show that cc(Kn) ≤ 1. Clearly, the family = {V (Kn)} is a clique cover of Kn. Thus, cc(Kn) ≤ || = |{V (Kn)}| =1. Accordingly, cc(Kn)=1. (⇒) Assume that cc(G) = 1. Then there exists a family = {S}, where S is a clique in G. Hence, for every vertex v ∈ V (G), v ∈ S. Thus, V (G) ⊆ S. ∼ Accordingly, S = V (G) and S = V (G) = Kn. The following result follows from Theorem 2.3. Corollary 2.4 Let G be a connected graph of order n. Then cc(G) ≥ 2 if and only if G is not isomorphic to Kn. Theorem 2.5 Let G be a graph of order n.IfG1,G2,... ,Gk are the com- k ponents of G, then cc(G)= cc(Gi). i=1 n Proof : Let i be a clique cover of Gi such that |i| = cc(Gi). Clearly, i i=1 n n covers G. Hence, cc(G) ≤ |i| = cc(Gi). Suppose now that is a i=1 i=1 clique cover of G with cc(G)=||. For each i, let i = {V (Gi) ∩ S : S ∈}. n Then i is a clique cover of Gi for each i =1, 2,... ,k. Therefore, cc(Gi) ≤ i=1 n n |i| = || = cc(G). This proves that cc(G)= Gi. i=1 i=1 The following result gives the relationship between the clique covering num- ber of a graph and the clique covering number of its subgraphs. 4304 Frederick S. Gella and Rosalio G. Artes, Jr. Theorem 2.6 The following hold: (a) There exists a graph G and a proper subgraph G1 of G such that cc(G1) <cc(G). (b) There exists a graph G and a proper subgraph G1 of G such that cc(G1)=cc(G). (c) There exists a graph G and a proper subgraph G1 of G such that cc(G1) >cc(G). In view of the preceding result, the following questions arise: 1. If G1 is a subgraph of G, what properties must be possessed by G1 so that cc(G1) ≥ cc(G)? 2. If G1 is a subgraph of G what properties must be possessed by G1 so that cc(G1) ≤ ccG? Theorem 2.7 and Theorem 2.8 give answers to the above questions. Theorem 2.7 If H is an induced subgraph of G, then cc(H) ≤ cc(G). Proof : Let G be a clique cover of G such that cc(G)=|G|. Let H = {V (H) ∩ S : S ∈G}. Then H is a clique cover of H. Hence, cc(H) ≤ |H | = |G| = cc(G). Theorem 2.8 If H is a spanning subgraph of G, then cc(H) ≥ cc(G). Proof : Let H and G be clique covers of H and G, respectively such that cc(H)=H and cc(G)=G. Then for every clique cover H of H, H is also a clique cover of G. Hence, cc(H) ≥ cc(G). 3 Characterization We now characterize all graphs whose clique covering number equal their cor- responding sizes and orders. We prove our result using the following lemmas and theorem. Lemma 3.1 Let G be a graph of order n ≥ 2.IfG contains K2 as a subgraph, then cc(G) <n. Proof : Let G be a graph of order n ≥ 2 andK2 as a subgraph of G. Since V (K2) is a clique, the family = {V (K2)} {{u} : u ∈ V (G) \ V (K2)} is a clique cover of G. Hence, cc(G) ≤ || = |V (G)|−1 < |V (G)|. Therefore, cc(G) ≤ || = n − 1 <nby definition of a clique covering number of a graph. This proves the lemma. Clique cover of graphs 4305 Lemma 3.2 Let G be a graph of order n.Ifcc(G)=n and v ∈ V (G), then degG(v)=0. Proof : Suppose degG(v) = 0. Then there exists u ∈ V (G) such that v is adjacent u. Let V (K2)={u, v}. Since G contains K2 as subgraph, then by Lemma 3.1 cc(G) <n. Theorem 3.3 Let G be a graph of order n. Then cc(G)=n if and only if ∼ G = Kn. ∼ Proof : Assume G = Kn. By Theorem 2.3 and Theorem 2.5, cc(G)=cc(Kn)= n cc(K1)=n. i=1 For the converse, suppose that cc(G)=n. By Lemma 3.2, G is Kn. Lemma 3.4 Let G be a connected graph of order n ≥ 4 and size m.IfG contains K3 or P4 as a subgraph, then cc(G) <m. Proof : Let G be a connected graph of order n ≥ 4 and K3 a subgraph of G. Let V (K3)={a, b, c}. Since b is incident to ab and c is incident to ac, it follows from the connectedness of G that the family = {{u, v} : uv ∈ E(G)}\ {{b, c}}} is a clique cover of G. Hence cc(G) ≤ || = |E(G)|−1 < |E(G)| by definition of a clique covering number of a graph. Let P4 =[a, b, c, d]. Since b is incident to ab and c is incident to cd, it follows from the connectedness of G that the family = {{u, v} : uv ∈ E(G)}\ {{b, c}} is a clique cover of G.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regular Clique Covers of Graphs
    Regular clique covers of graphs Dan Archdeacon Dept. of Math. and Stat. University of Vermont Burlington, VT 05405 USA [email protected] Dalibor Fronˇcek Dept. of Math. and Stat. Univ. of Minnesota Duluth Duluth, MN 55812-3000 USA and Technical Univ. Ostrava 70833Ostrava,CzechRepublic [email protected] Robert Jajcay Department of Mathematics Indiana State University Terre Haute, IN 47809 USA [email protected] Zdenˇek Ryj´aˇcek Department of Mathematics University of West Bohemia 306 14 Plzeˇn, Czech Republic [email protected] Jozef Sir´ˇ aˇn Department of Mathematics SvF Slovak Univ. of Technology 81368Bratislava,Slovakia [email protected] Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 27(2003), pp.307–316 Abstract A family of cliques in a graph G is said to be p-regular if any two cliques in the family intersect in exactly p vertices. A graph G is said to have a p-regular k-clique cover if there is a p-regular family H of k-cliques of G such that each edge of G belongs to a clique in H. Such a p-regular k- clique cover is separable if the complete subgraphs of order p that arise as intersections of pairs of distinct cliques of H are mutually vertex-disjoint. For any given integers p, k, ; p<k, we present bounds on the smallest order of a graph that has a p-regular k-clique cover with exactly cliques, and we describe all graphs that have p-regular separable k-clique covers with cliques. 1 Introduction An orthogonal double cover of a complete graph Kn by a graph H is a collection H of spanning subgraphs of Kn, all isomorphic to H, such that each edge of Kn is contained in exactly two subgraphs in H and any two distinct subgraphs in H share exactly one edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Approximating the Minimum Clique Cover and Other Hard Problems in Subtree filament Graphs
    Approximating the minimum clique cover and other hard problems in subtree filament graphs J. Mark Keil∗ Lorna Stewart† March 20, 2006 Abstract Subtree filament graphs are the intersection graphs of subtree filaments in a tree. This class of graphs contains subtree overlap graphs, interval filament graphs, chordal graphs, circle graphs, circular-arc graphs, cocomparability graphs, and polygon-circle graphs. In this paper we show that, for circle graphs, the clique cover problem is NP-complete and the h-clique cover problem for fixed h is solvable in polynomial time. We then present a general scheme for developing approximation algorithms for subtree filament graphs, and give approximation algorithms developed from the scheme for the following problems which are NP-complete on circle graphs and therefore on subtree filament graphs: clique cover, vertex colouring, maximum k-colourable subgraph, and maximum h-coverable subgraph. Key Words: subtree filament graph, circle graph, clique cover, NP-complete, approximation algorithm. 1 Introduction Subtree filament graphs were defined in [10] to be the intersection graphs of subtree filaments in a tree, as follows. Consider a tree T = (VT ,ET ) and a multiset of n ≥ 1 subtrees {Ti | 1 ≤ i ≤ n} of T . Let T be embedded in a plane P , and consider the surface S that is perpendicular to P , such that the intersection of S with P is T . A subtree filament corresponding to subtree Ti of T is a connected curve in S, above P , connecting all the leaves of Ti, such that, for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n: • if Ti ∩ Tj = ∅ then the filaments corresponding to Ti and Tj do not intersect, and ∗Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 5C9, [email protected], 306-966-4894.
    [Show full text]
  • Edge Clique Covers in Graphs with Independence Number
    Edge clique covers in graphs with independence number two Pierre Charbit, Geňa Hahn, Marcin Kamiński, Manuel Lafond, Nicolas Lichiardopol, Reza Naserasr, Ben Seamone, Rezvan Sherkati To cite this version: Pierre Charbit, Geňa Hahn, Marcin Kamiński, Manuel Lafond, Nicolas Lichiardopol, et al.. Edge clique covers in graphs with independence number two. Journal of Graph Theory, Wiley, In press. hal-02969899 HAL Id: hal-02969899 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02969899 Submitted on 17 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ORIG I NAL AR TI CLE Edge CLIQUE COVERS IN GRAPHS WITH INDEPENDENCE NUMBER TWO Pierre Charbit1 | GeNAˇ Hahn 2 | Marcin Kamiński3 | Manuel Lafond4 | Nicolas Lichiardopol5 | Reza NaserASR1 | Ben Seamone2,6 | Rezvan Sherkati7 1Université DE Paris, IRIF, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, FRANCE The EDGE CLIQUE COVER NUMBER ECC¹Gº OF A GRAPH G IS SIZE OF 2Département d’informatique ET DE THE SMALLEST COLLECTION OF COMPLETE SUBGRAPHS WHOSE UNION RECHERCHE opérationnelle, Université DE Montréal, Canada COVERS ALL EDGES OF G. Chen, Jacobson, Kézdy, Lehel, Schein- 3Institute OF Computer Science, UnivERSITY erman, AND WANG CONJECTURED IN 2000 THAT IF G IS CLAw-free, OF WARSAW, POLAND THEN ECC¹Gº IS BOUNDED ABOVE BY ITS ORDER (DENOTED n).
    [Show full text]
  • A Constructive Formalization of the Weak Perfect Graph Theorem
    A Constructive Formalization of the Weak Perfect Graph Theorem Abhishek Kr Singh1 and Raja Natarajan2 1 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India [email protected] 2 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India [email protected] Abstract The Perfect Graph Theorems are important results in graph theory describing the relationship between clique number ω(G) and chromatic number χ(G) of a graph G. A graph G is called perfect if χ(H) = ω(H) for every induced subgraph H of G. The Strong Perfect Graph Theorem (SPGT) states that a graph is perfect if and only if it does not contain an odd hole (or an odd anti-hole) as its induced subgraph. The Weak Perfect Graph Theorem (WPGT) states that a graph is perfect if and only if its complement is perfect. In this paper, we present a formal framework for working with finite simple graphs. We model finite simple graphs in the Coq Proof Assistant by representing its vertices as a finite set over a countably infinite domain. We argue that this approach provides a formal framework in which it is convenient to work with different types of graph constructions (or expansions) involved in the proof of the Lovász Replication Lemma (LRL), which is also the key result used in the proof of Weak Perfect Graph Theorem. Finally, we use this setting to develop a constructive formalization of the Weak Perfect Graph Theorem. Digital Object Identifier 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPP.2020. 1 Introduction The chromatic number χ(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of colours needed to colour the vertices of G so that no two adjacent vertices get the same colour.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Graph Covering and Partitioning
    Takustr. 7 Zuse Institute Berlin 14195 Berlin Germany STEPHAN SCHWARTZ An Overview of Graph Covering and Partitioning ZIB Report 20-24 (August 2020) Zuse Institute Berlin Takustr. 7 14195 Berlin Germany Telephone: +49 30-84185-0 Telefax: +49 30-84185-125 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.zib.de ZIB-Report (Print) ISSN 1438-0064 ZIB-Report (Internet) ISSN 2192-7782 An Overview of Graph Covering and Partitioning Stephan Schwartz Abstract While graph covering is a fundamental and well-studied problem, this eld lacks a broad and unied literature review. The holistic overview of graph covering given in this article attempts to close this gap. The focus lies on a characterization and classication of the dierent problems discussed in the literature. In addition, notable results and common approaches are also included. Whenever appropriate, our review extends to the corresponding partioning problems. Graph covering problems are among the most classical and central subjects in graph theory. They also play a huge role in many mathematical models for various real-world applications. There are two dierent variants that are concerned with covering the edges and, respectively, the vertices of a graph. Both draw a lot of scientic attention and are subject to prolic research. In this paper we attempt to give an overview of the eld of graph covering problems. In a graph covering problem we are given a graph G and a set of possible subgraphs of G. Following the terminology of Knauer and Ueckerdt [KU16], we call G the host graph while the set of possible subgraphs forms the template class.
    [Show full text]
  • On Variants of Clique Problems and Their Applications by Zhuoli Xiao B
    On Variants of Clique Problems and their Applications by Zhuoli Xiao B.Sc., University of University of Victoria, 2014 A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Computer Science c Zhuoli Xiao, 2018 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This project may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii On Variants of Clique Problems and their Applications by Zhuoli Xiao B.Sc., University of University of Victoria, 2014 Supervisory Committee Dr. Ulrike Stege, Supervisor (Department of Computer Science) Dr. Hausi A. Muller, Commitee Member (Department of Computer Science) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Ulrike Stege, Supervisor (Department of Computer Science) Dr. Hausi A. Muller, Commitee Member (Department of Computer Science) ABSTRACT Clique-based problems, often called cluster problems, receive more and more attention in computer science as well as many of its application areas. Clique-based problems can be used to model a number of real-world problems and with this comes the mo- tivation to provide algorithmic solutions for them. While one can find quite a lot of literature on clique-based problems in general, only for few specific versions exact algorithmic solutions are discussed in detail. In this project, we survey such clique- based problems from the literature, investigate their properties, their exact algorithms and respective running times, and discuss some of their applications. In particular, in depth we consider the two NP-complete clique-based problems Edge Clique Partition and Edge Clique Cover.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Triangle Clique Cover and $ K T $ Clique Cover Problems
    On the Triangle Clique Cover and Kt Clique Cover Problems Hoang Dau Olgica Milenkovic Gregory J. Puleo Abstract An edge clique cover of a graph is a set of cliques that covers all edges of the graph. We generalize this concept to Kt clique cover, i.e. a set of cliques that covers all complete subgraphs on t vertices of the graph, for every t ≥ 1. In particular, we extend a classical result of Erd¨os,Goodman, and P´osa(1966) on the edge clique cover number (t = 2), also known as the intersection number, to the case t = 3. The upper bound is tight, with equality holding only for the Tur´angraph T (n; 3). As part of the proof, we obtain new upper bounds on the classical intersection number, which may be of independent interest. We also extend an algorithm of Scheinerman and Trenk (1999) to solve a weighted version of the Kt clique cover problem on a superclass of chordal graphs. We also prove that the Kt clique cover problem is NP-hard. 1 Introduction A clique in a graph G is a set of vertices that induces a complete subgraph; all graphs considered in this paper are simple and undirected. A vertex clique cover of a graph G is a set of cliques in G that collectively cover all of its vertices. The vertex clique cover number of G, denoted θv(G), is the minimum number of cliques in a vertex clique cover of G. An edge clique cover of a graph G is a set of cliques of G that collectively cover all of its edges.
    [Show full text]
  • II. Stable Sets and Colourings
    II. Stable sets and colourings 1. Stable sets and colourings Let G = (V,E) be a graph. A stable set is a subset S of V containing no edge of G. A clique is a subset C of V such that any two vertices in C are adjacent. So (1) S is a stable set of G S is a clique of G, ⇐⇒ where G denotes the complementary graph of G.1 A vertex-colouring or colouring of G is a partition Π of V into stable sets S1,...,Sk. The sets S1,...,Sk are called the colours of the colouring. A clique cover of G is a partition Π of V into cliques. Define: (2) α(G) := max S S is a stable set , {| || } ω(G) := max C C is a clique , {| || } χ(G) := min Π Π is a colouring , {| || } χ(G) := min Π Π is a clique cover . {| || } These numbers are called the stable set number, the clique number, the vertex-colouring number or colouring number, and the clique cover number of G, respectively. We say that a graph G is k-(vertex-)colourable if χ(G) k. ≤ Note that (3) α(G)= ω(G) and χ(G)= χ(G). We have seen that in any graph G = (V,E), a maximum-size matching can be found in polynomial time. This means that α(L(G)) can be found in polynomial time, where L(G) is the line graph of G.2 On the other hand, it is NP-complete to find a maximum-size stable set in a graph.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Searching & Perfect Graphs
    Graph Searching & Perfect Graphs∗ Lalla Mouatadid University of Toronto Abstract Perfect graphs, by definition, have a nice structure, that graph searching seems to extract in a, often non-inexpensive, manner. We scratch the surface of this elegant research area by giving two examples: Lexicographic Breadth Search on Chordal Graphs, and Lexicographic Depth First Search on Cocomparability graphs. 1 Introduction Here's one particular way to cope with NP-hardness: Suppose we know some structure about the object we are dealing with, can we exploit said structure to come up with simple (hmm...?), efficient algorithms to NP-hard problems. One example of this structure is the \interval representation" most people are familiar with, where in such a setting we were able to solve the independent set problem in linear time, whereas the independent set problem on arbitrary graphs cannot even be approximated in polynomial time to a constant factor (unless P = NP). Before we delve into the topic, let's recall some definitions. Let G(V; E) be a finite and simple (no loops and no multiple edges) graph: • The neighbourhood of a vertex v is the set of vertices adjacent to v. We write N(v) = fujuv 2 Eg. The closed neighbourhood of v is N[v] = N(v) [ fvg. • The complement of G, denoted G(V; E) is the graph on the same set of vertices as G, where for all u; v 2 V; uv 2 E () uv2 = E. • A induced subgraph of G is a graph G0(V 0;E0) where V 0 ⊆ V and 8u; v 2 V 0, uv 2 E0 () uv 2 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Clique Cover Problem on (Bull, $ C 4 $)-Free Graphs
    Solving the clique cover problem on (bull, C4)-free graphs∗ Kathie Cameron1 Ch´ınh T. Ho`ang2 1 Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3C5 [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Computer Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3C5 [email protected] Abstract We give an O(n4) algorithm to find a minimum clique cover of a (bull, C4)-free graph, or equivalently, a minimum colouring of a (bull, 2K2)-free graph, where n is the number of vertices of the graphs. 1 Background A hole is a chordless cycle with at least four vertices, and is called odd or even depending on whether the number of vertices is odd or even. As usual, we will use Ck to denote the hole with k vertices. The bull is the graph consisting of a C3 together with two additional vertices of degree 1 adjacent to distinct vertices of the C3. Where H is a graph, a graph G is called H-free if G has no induced arXiv:1704.00316v1 [cs.DM] 2 Apr 2017 subgraph isomorphic to H. Where is a set of graphs, a graph G is called H -free if it is H-free for every H . In particular, (bull, C4)-free graphs are H ∈ H the graphs which have no induced bulls or C4s. Where X is a subset of the vertices of a graph G, we use G[X] to denote the subgraph of G induced by X. Let G be a graph. A clique cover of G is a set of cliques of G such that every vertex is in at least one of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Graphs Chinh T
    University of Dayton eCommons Computer Science Faculty Publications Department of Computer Science 2015 Perfect Graphs Chinh T. Hoang Wilfrid Laurier University R. Sritharan University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/cps_fac_pub Part of the Graphics and Human Computer Interfaces Commons, and the Other Computer Sciences Commons eCommons Citation Hoang, Chinh T. and Sritharan, R., "Perfect Graphs" (2015). Computer Science Faculty Publications. 87. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/cps_fac_pub/87 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Computer Science at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Computer Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CHAPTE R 28 Perfect Graphs Chinh T. Hoang* R. Sritharan t CO NTENTS 28.1 Introd uction ... .. ..... ............. ............................... .. ........ .. 708 28.2 Notation ............................. .. ..................... .................... 710 28.3 Chordal Graphs ....................... ................. ....... ............. 710 28.3.1 Characterization ............ ........................... .... .. ... 710 28.3.2 Recognition .................... ..................... ... .. ........ .. ... 712 28.3.3 Optimization ................................................ .. ......... 715 28.4 Comparability Graphs ............................................... ..... .. 715 28.4.1 Characterization
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Weight Clique Cover in Claw-Free Perfect Graphs
    Minimum weight clique cover in claw-free perfect graphs Flavia Bonomo 1 1Departamento de Computaci´on,FCEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires Mathematical research seminar, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia, October 6th 2014 Flavia Bonomo Minimum clique cover in claw-free perfect graphs University of Primorska, Koper, 2014 1 / 39 Goal: Minimize the number of cliques (MCC). Complexity: NP-hard in general. Lower bound: Maximum stable set (MSS). Clique cover Task: Cover all the vertices of a graph by cliques. Flavia Bonomo Minimum clique cover in claw-free perfect graphs University of Primorska, Koper, 2014 2 / 39 Goal: Minimize the number of cliques (MCC). Complexity: NP-hard in general. Lower bound: Maximum stable set (MSS). Clique cover Task: Cover all the vertices of a graph by cliques. Flavia Bonomo Minimum clique cover in claw-free perfect graphs University of Primorska, Koper, 2014 2 / 39 Complexity: NP-hard in general. Lower bound: Maximum stable set (MSS). Clique cover Task: Cover all the vertices of a graph by cliques. Goal: Minimize the number of cliques (MCC). Flavia Bonomo Minimum clique cover in claw-free perfect graphs University of Primorska, Koper, 2014 2 / 39 Complexity: NP-hard in general. Lower bound: Maximum stable set (MSS). Clique cover Task: Cover all the vertices of a graph by cliques. Goal: Minimize the number of cliques (MCC). Flavia Bonomo Minimum clique cover in claw-free perfect graphs University of Primorska, Koper, 2014 2 / 39 Lower bound: Maximum stable set (MSS). Clique cover Task: Cover all the vertices of a graph by cliques. Goal: Minimize the number of cliques (MCC).
    [Show full text]