DOCSLIB.ORG

Ranger District Pikes Peak National Forest Pike

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ranger District Pikes Peak National Forest Pike !E !E !E !E E !E a s t P l u m C r e e k Deckers 23 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 24 19 20 24 24 19 22 23 19 20 21 22 23 H !E Fo o ur r m se i C le r k C ee ree !E !E r k C e r 25 e ea k 26 29 27 26 e r u t l u c i r g A f o t n e m t r a p e D s e t a t S d e t i n U 27 25 B 30 29 28 30 25 25 27 26 30 48002080 27 26 490000 28 500000 510000 105°152'09"W 105°7'30"W 105°0'0"W 104°52'30"W e c i v r e S t s e r o F PURPOSE AND CONTENTS OPERATOR R70W R69W R68W R67W W 0 1 0 2 O D A R O L O C a t ch s l o RESPONSIBILITIES u ! OF THIS MAP G n s H u P 35 Larkspur 35W o 31 em rse Creek olh a 31 The designations shown on this map are Operating a motor vehicle on National Forest r P 36 r 31 32 33 34 36 32 e k 34 32 33 35 33 k 35 n 36 31 C e 34 35 33 34 36 e System roads, National Forest System trails, and in 32 r effective as of the date stamped or printed on the G T r s r o o d t u O t a e r G s ' a c i r e m A rout Creek 34 e e C u k areas on National Forest System lands carries a l front cover. This map shows the National Forest h c m c h ek u l e Cr l greater responsibility than operating that vehicle in a u System roads, National Forest System trails, and k k P r G e t e a s C g r city or other developed setting. Not only must the t a a e r u t c i P the areas on National Forest System lands in the n C S M n E r i o p r r y e motor vehicle operators know and follow all applicable W a tz e Pikes Peak Ranger District that are designated for p n 1 4 n k e a e e C t S e B 5 e 2 r s 5 4 3 C 2 6 r C 1 6 k a C motor vehicle use pursuant to 36 CFR 212.51. This traffic laws, but they need to show concern for the 43400200 5 4 3 2 t 1 6 05 4 2 r e r 4340000 3 1 p 3 r e n e C e r k 6 m a y a r t environment as well as other forest users. The misuse C C o 3 e S map also contains a list of those designated roads, e n S e v c k k o t u P e r e H trails, and areas that enumerates the types of of motor vehicles can lead to the temporary or h ee o r G o C e T n agl South Platte vehicles that are allowed on each route and in each permanent closure of any designated road, trail, or o E o F N lic v v k e i F area. Operators of motor vehicles are subject to State en r a k area and any seasonal restrictions that apply on Cheesman s G S e 53 t 3 e e R 4 K u J i 67 Ranger District Storm Peak r n l 8 traffic law, including State requirements for licensing, Lake c ¬ 3 12 C « those routes and in those areas. G 7 h 0 7 8 9 11 12 11 !E u 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 0 ) 10 m 9 10 12 10 11 12 7 l 10 11 u registration, and operation of the vehicle in question. c T l h P ch o t 8 ul v In s G T i d a Designation of a road, trail, or area for motor ow 6 a i E oll r 3 N a H a 1 F n Motor vehicle use, especially off-highway vehicle g i C vehicle use by a particular class of vehicle under 36 on l S T L LONG R r S 6 ee use, involves inherent risks that may cause property a r 5 8 3 k n o 0 CFR 212.51 should not be interpreted as d 0 HOLLOW 4 0 Dr F u 3 348.H 3 aw o t damage, serious injury, and possibly death to u 0 C 14 0 encouraging or inviting use, or to imply that the r !E 922 17 m r 16 e 15 14 participants. Riders should drive cautiously and i 18 17 e 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 16 road, trail or area is passable, actively maintained, l 14 13 k 15 3 15 14 13 18 17 e 15 1 923 327 18 3 2 anticipate rough surfaces and features, such as snow, C 6 9 k or safe for travel. Motor vehicle designations e r 16 1 e e 6 r mud, vegetation, and water crossings common to e 5 3 C k 0 6 include parking along designated routes and at 913 Stark facilities associated with designated routes when it remote driving conditions. Participants voluntarily Thunder Butte T10S !E 4 T10S ) C 3 . K D is safe to do so and when not causing damage to assume full responsibility for these damages, risks, 2 917 3 8 6 300. k 33 4 4 35 0 ee A 8 3 1 r Tu .E 23 0 C and dangers. Motor vehicle operators should take care C 3 e National Forest System resources. Seasonal r 24 20 . 332.E F k ern C ov 2 22 ey 19 19 21 22 51 24 re 20 30 G 22 23 24 21 23 3 weather conditions and natural events may render at all times to protect themselves and those under the22ir 23 24 C 20 21 22 3 ek351 0. 105 23 r 3 904 k E K e e J e re 21 19 20 responsibility. k 3 19 designated routes and trails impassable for C C 0 . rn 4 3 348.F e 3 A 903 F 0 . 2 7 3 912 6 0 ek extended periods. Designated areas may contain Much of the Pikes Peak Ranger District is remote, 2 3 . e C C r 5 3 C 3 915 3 k dangerous or impassable terrain. Many designated 3 5 3 47 00.G ree r and medical assistance may not be readily available. 352.B 3 0 4 3 C te 3 8 Cook n 32 2 3 e roads and trails may be passable only by high- .D 3 B p Cellular telephones do not work in many areas of the L 2 . r !E 5 3 2 50 25 a 26 i West 3 3 . 3 t A 28 C 3 clearance vehicles or four-wheel drive vehicles. Pikes Peak Ranger District. Operators should take t S ! 29 2 350.A .D 28 l 29 B h 25 30 28 . 8 4 0 27 26 25 e 27 26 r Creek A 34 348. 4 30 C 3 0 27 25 28 27 26 30 29 e C 30 29 T w . Maintenance of designated roads and trails will adequate food, water, first aid supplies, and other s 26 . 27 25 u C bu 2.B 0 r A 3 t c i r t s i D r e g n a R .A 3 h k 32 0 r 3 901 344.B A e WZ k g c re depend on available resources, and many may equipment appropriate for the conditions and expected .B l 3 e G 3 348 C 34 u y T u 9 4 .G 8 um l 9 902 7 l C u c 8 8 G P receive little maintenance. weather. h 6 4 4 t r 3 i 9 s r k South Platte a 3 r e 2 E e e 910 4 909 3 u 4 4 y k a e P s e k i P 3 k .C 4 905 o C 3 s 68 3 s r K 5 J i e 35 916 ALWAYS REMEMBER TO RESPECT PRIVATE e Ranger District 73 0 This motor vehicle use map identifies those k N KJ 67 ch M !E o 35 32 33 Missouri Gul 918 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 34 35 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 3 «¬ 32 LAND! PROTECT YOUR PRIVILEGE. STAY ON r 36 t s e r o F l a n o i t a N roads, trails, and areas designated for motor vehicle t h 4 3 33 r 200 31 3 34 908 47 DESIGNATED ROADS AND TRAILS AND IN u 3 .E 9 use under 36 CFR 212.51 for the purpose of 4 911 p !D 19 3 G 907 W DESIGNATED AREAS. enforcing the prohibition at 36 CFR 261.13. This is a u DOUGLAS COUNTY A RAINBOW DOUGLAS COUNTY e l S e k i P c s h t o limited purpose.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peaks-Glacier
    Glacier National Park Summit List ©2003, 2006 Glacier Mountaineering Society Page 1 Summit El Quadrangle Notes ❑ Adair Ridge 5,366 Camas Ridge West ❑ Ahern Peak 8,749 Ahern Pass ❑ Allen Mountain 9,376 Many Glacier ❑ Almost-A-Dog Mtn. 8,922 Mount Stimson ❑ Altyn Peak 7,947 Many Glacier ❑ Amphitheater Mountain 8,690 Cut Bank Pass ❑ Anaconda Peak 8,279 Mount Geduhn ❑ Angel Wing 7,430 Many Glacier ❑ Apgar Mountains 6,651 McGee Meadow ❑ Apikuni Mountain 9,068 Many Glacier ❑ Appistoki Peak 8,164 Squaw Mountain ❑ B-7 Pillar (3) 8,712 Ahern Pass ❑ Bad Marriage Mtn. 8,350 Cut Bank Pass ❑ Baring Point 7,306 Rising Sun ❑ Barrier Buttes 7,402 Mount Rockwell ❑ Basin Mountain 6,920 Kiowa ❑ Battlement Mountain 8,830 Mount Saint Nicholas ❑ Bear Mountain 8,841 Mount Cleveland ❑ Bear Mountain Point 6,300 Gable Mountain ❑ Bearhat Mountain 8,684 Mount Cannon ❑ Bearhead Mountain 8,406 Squaw Mountain ❑ Belton Hills 6,339 Lake McDonald West ❑ Bighorn Peak 7,185 Vulture Peak ❑ Bishops Cap 9,127 Logan Pass ❑ Bison Mountain 7,833 Squaw Mountain ❑ Blackfoot Mountain 9,574 Mount Jackson ❑ Blacktail Hills 6,092 Blacktail ❑ Boulder Peak 8,528 Mount Carter ❑ Boulder Ridge 6,415 Lake Sherburne ❑ Brave Dog Mountain 8,446 Blacktail ❑ Brown, Mount 8,565 Mount Cannon ❑ Bullhead Point 7,445 Many Glacier ❑ Calf Robe Mountain 7,920 Squaw Mountain ❑ Campbell Mountain 8,245 Porcupine Ridge ❑ Cannon, Mount 8,952 Mount Cannon ❑ Cannon, Mount, SW Pk. 8,716 Mount Cannon ❑ Caper Peak 8,310 Mount Rockwell ❑ Carter, Mount 9,843 Mount Carter ❑ Cataract Mountain 8,180 Logan Pass ❑ Cathedral
    [Show full text]
  • 1979 As OCR RT 3-19-19
    STATE OF NEW YORK ADIRONDACK PARK STATE LAND MASTER PLAN Prepared by the ADIRONDACK PARK AGENCY Theodore M. Ruzow, Chairman in consultation with the DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Robert F. Flacke, Commissioner Submitted to GOVERNOR HUGH L. CAREY April 20, 1979 MEMBERS OF THE ADIRONDACK PARK AGENCY CHAIRMAN Theodore M. Ruzow Essex County 1. Barron Clancy, Warren County Arthur V. Savage, Pelham Anne LaBastille, Herkimer County John W. Stock, Franklin County Peter S. Paine, Jr., New York City Elizabeth Thorndike, Rochester Donald Wadsworth, Hamilton County EX-OFFICIO: Robert F. Flacke Commissioner of Environmental Conservation William D. Hassett, Jr. Basil A. Paterson Commissioner of Commerce Secretary of State Executive Director Vincent J. Moore April 20, 1979 Honorable Hugh L. Carey Governor, State of New York Executive Chamber State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Dear Governor Carey: We have the honor to transmit herewith a revised sentatives of a wide variety of interest groups including: Master Plan for the management of state lands within The Adirondack Mountain Club, the New York State the Adirondack Park. The revised Master Plan is sub­ Conservation Council, the Wilderness Society, the Sierra mitted for your consideration and approval in accord­ Club, the Association for the Protection of the Adiron­ ance with Section 816 of the Adirondack Park Agency dacks, the Adirondack Conservation Council, Region 5 Act, Article 27 of the Executive Law. Fish and Wildlife Management Board, float plane oper­ The original Master Plan approved in 1972 classi­ ators, snowmobile clubs and the Easter Seal Society. fied the some 2.3 million acres of state land according The Agency also met on two occasions with an informal to their character and capacity to withstand use and advisory committee composed of citizens with interest set forth general guidelines and criteria for the man­ in or knowledge of state lands within the Park.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains of Maine Title
    e Mountains of Maine: Skiing in the Pine Tree State Dedicated to the Memory of John Christie A great skier and friend of the Ski Museum of Maine e New England Ski Museum extends sincere thanks An Exhibit by the to these people and organizations who contributed New England Ski Museum time, knowledge and expertise to this exhibition. and the e Membership of New England Ski Museum Glenn Parkinson Ski Museum of Maine Art Tighe of Foto Factory Jim uimby Scott Andrews Ted Sutton E. John B. Allen Ken Williams Traveling exhibit made possible by Leigh Breidenbach Appalachian Mountain Club Dan Cassidy Camden Public Library P.W. Sprague Memorial Foundation John Christie Maine Historical Society Joe Cushing Saddleback Mountain Cate & Richard Gilbane Dave Irons Ski Museum of Maine Bruce Miles Sugarloaf Mountain Ski Club Roland O’Neal Sunday River Isolated Outposts of Maine Skiing 1870 to 1930 In the annals of New England skiing, the state of Maine was both a leader and a laggard. e rst historical reference to the use of skis in the region dates back to 1871 in New Sweden, where a colony of Swedish immigrants was induced to settle in the untamed reaches of northern Aroostook County. e rst booklet to oer instruction in skiing to appear in the United States was printed in 1905 by the eo A. Johnsen Company of Portland. Despite these early glimmers of skiing awareness, when the sport began its ascendancy to popularity in the 1930s, the state’s likeliest venues were more distant, and public land ownership less widespread, than was the case in the neighboring states of New Hampshire and Vermont, and ski area development in those states was consequently greater.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • PIKES PEAK CYCLING HILL CLIMB COMPETITIVE HILL CLIMB RACE Saturday, August 7, 2021 USA Cycling Hill Climb Race Club: Colorado Springs Sports Corporation
    PIKES PEAK CYCLING HILL CLIMB COMPETITIVE HILL CLIMB RACE Saturday, August 7, 2021 USA Cycling Hill Climb Race Club: Colorado Springs Sports Corporation Event Website: PikesPeakCyclingHillClimb.org COVID MITIGATION DETAILS: PPCHC - COVID-19 MITIGATION.pdf REGISTRATION: ALL CYCLISTS MUST PRE-REGISTER FOR THIS EVENT! NO DAY OF REGISTRATION. • Early Registration: March 2-April 30 – Fee is $70 ($40 for Juniors U19); Competitive E-Bike Fee $65 • Standard Registration: May 1-August 3 – Fee is $75 ($45 for Juniors U19); Competitive E-Bike Fee $70 • Packet Pickup Registration: August 6 & 7 – Fee is $85 ($55 for Juniors U19); Competitive E-Bike Fee $75 COMPETITIVE RACE INFO: All USAC rules apply. USAC waiver must be signed by all racers or parent/guardian for anyone 18 years or younger. BRAC membership required for Colorado USAC members. The Broadmoor Pikes Peak Cycling Hill Climb Gran Fondo will be taking place in conjunction with the Competitive Hill Climb race. Please keep in mind you are sharing the course. Be courteous and aware during your race, communicate clearly as you overtake other cyclists, and use the Yellow Line Rule at all times. For the Competitive E-Bike category, all e-bikes must meet the definition of a Class 1 e- bike (maximum motor size of 750 watts, no throttle, and maximum pedal assisted speed of 20 mph). REQUIRED LICENSE USAC 1-Day Beginner license: $10 (only for Cat 5 Men/Women and Juniors who have never previously held a USAC license with a higher category); Experienced license: $25, only available to former USAC members Cat 1/2/3/4.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Awesome Infographic
    [ ALIVE [ Article MOST LIKELY TO HAVE A HIGHWArticleAY TO THEALIVE TOP TALLEST Pikes Peak (near Colorado Springs) and Mt. Evans A FEW INTERESTING (near Idaho Springs) both have incredibly scenic Mt. Elbert at 14,440 and winding roads that go to the tippy top. WHAT IS A OURTEENER? southwest of Leadville MOST POSTCARDED A peak that rises 14,000 feet or more above sea level. Colorado is PEAKS AMONG THE home to more of these than any other state. (Alaska has 22; California Thousands k eep them clean sum e one on pr that Bef VE NO TRACEafter has 12; Washington has 1) xtr CROWD staying epa WHO DO the subject, r eme or SHORTEST Sunshine Peak at 14,001 LEA wildlife. mit y c ou ra limbinge you go skip you gr ar and Mt.Mar Snef tion. near Lake City aphed epeaks likely in bef ha climb weather, oon P ve on by or Pick See e the these Mt. Bierstadt near Idaho packing EASIEST TO HIKE designated eak near our the most photo a esear and fternoon lev up YOU THINK Springs is often recognized as the perfect lnt.org fels near head ping up a mountainside, el peaks fourteener ch yourone starter fourteener, followed by Grays Peak in tact for of out the state. Aspen up fitness to tackle,of and Torreys Peak near lightning c for Our an tr anything earl the Keystone. r ails - oute and mak ay be -HAVE ITEMS more s y plentiful MUST those NUMBER OF FOURTEENERS Several vie for each and — danger HARDEST Layers of clothing storms this title — Capitol and YOU inf you r who Peak, Little Bear, ormation.especting year guide ous pr Hiking shoes be re pack epa e sur Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • 5B Part Two- MAY
    Pike National Historic Trail Association Newsletter May-B 2016 Vol. 10 No. 5B Part Two- MAY Celebrating 210 Years- The Santa Fe Trail Association (SFTA) celebrated the Bicentennial of Pike’s 1806-7 Southwest Expedition 10 years ago. One can use our website- zebulonpike.org to recall the many activities conducted during 2006. The Pike National Historic Trail Association became the child of the SFTA. It was formed by John Patrick Michael Murphy and our current President. SFTA donated its website and many of its leaders including Dr. Leo Oliva and Dr. Clive Siegle volunteered. Others from the Bicentennial Committee quickly joined the effort including Zebulon Montgomery Pike, Dorothy Urban, and Mike Bandera with Dr. Rev. Roy Escott Pike, Erwin Young, Patrick Surrena, Tom Rollings and Rex Rideout. Bicentennial Liberty Bell & Daffodil Pike’s Damn’d Rascals- 4 John Brown BOTH expeditions. Went with Pike, Robinson and Miller to climb Pikes Peak Tried for desertion August 2, 1809, at New Orleans. He had deserted Lt. Wilkinson at Fort Adams November 21, 1807, and had been absent until June 6, 1809, when he surrendered to Maj. Amos Stoddard at Natchitoches. His sentence of corporal punishment was remitted because of voluntary surrender. Brown lived in the Cold Water district of St. Louis County, Missouri, for 42 years. When he died at the age of 86 his obituary appeared in the Missouri Republican, August 21, 1840. He is believed to be the oldest rascal. January 24, 1807 Saturday- Pikes Journal … he [Brown] exclaimed, “that it was more than human nature could bear, to march three days without sustenance, through snows three feet deep, and carry burdens only fit for horses” &c.&c.” “Brown, you this day presumed to make use of language which was seditious and mutinous, … I will pardon, but be assured, should it ever be repeated, by instant death, I will revenge your ingratitude and punish your disobedience.” This was one of a very few instances where Pike had to discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak Massif
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]