DOCSLIB.ORG

Ari Shavit at Micah: NEW QUESTIONS to RECREATE JUDAISM Thoughts on Israel, DEAR FRIENDS, New Questions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ari Shavit at Micah: NEW QUESTIONS to RECREATE JUDAISM Thoughts on Israel, DEAR FRIENDS, New Questions NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 CHESHVAN/KISLEV/TEVET 5775 FROM RABBI ZEMEL Ari Shavit at Micah: NEW QUESTIONS TO RECREATE JUDAISM Thoughts on Israel, DEAR FRIENDS, New Questions. American Jewry and the Our Judaism will be alive if we learn to ask ourselves new questions. Doing Jewish Future so will help us become what I like to think of as religious artists. By Shelley Grossman Artists are people who ask When Ari Shavit, the best-selling was a big deal for Temple Micah and new questions. How many Israeli author of My Promised Land: The Shavit indicated the whole experience times have you been to an Triumph and Tragedy of Israel, spoke at has been a big deal for him, too. art gallery or museum and Temple Micah on Nov. 2, he had just “I’m so into your country!” he seen the ordinary or mun- dane turned into stunning spent several weeks traveling the United exclaimed. He had been to Washington art? Think Warhol soup cans, States addressing Jewish organizations many times in his capacity as a jour- Calder mobiles, Oldenburg… in every region. He acknowledged the nalist—Shavit is a reporter and colum- everything. Artists take the deep impression this experience made nist for Haaretz—but he didn’t equate everyday and make it into art, causing on him, which in turn influenced his Washington’s mostly liberal Jewish com- the rest of us to say, “Why didn’t I think talk about the history, the current munity with other Jewish concentra- of that?” situation and the future of Israel—the tions around the country. He marveled An artist learns the disciplines of the themes of his book and the original that American Jews “have managed to past and uses them to create something reason for his tour. His perspective has create a Jewish home. You maintain a new. That’s what we need to do with been broadened, he said. Jewish life on a voluntary basis. I am our Judaism. “The Jewish future. That is my deeply moved.” Much of the surprise On Yom Kippur I referred to this as the balancing act between histori- main passion,” Shavit said. And that in this revelation is most likely due cal fidelity and contemporary meaning. future intimately involves Israel, North to how little he—like most Israelis— Contemporary meaning is birthed when American Jews and the relationship knows about Judaism in America. Israeli we ask new questions. As I write this it between them. schools don’t teach about Diaspora is Sukkot, which provides a good exam- The book itself is “the must read Judaism and there is no real incentive ple. Historically, the sukkah itself was a Jewish book of the last 25 years,” Rabbi for Israelis to learn about it on their temporary hut that a farmer built in the Zemel said in introducing Shavit a few own, Shavit acknowledged. Indeed, the field to live in during harvest season. At days before heading to Israel with 34 classic Zionism that built Israel all but some point, some creative Jewish mind temple members on the latest Micah dismissed the Diaspora. asked a new question: “Can this hut also Mission to Israel. The rabbi had been But a vibrant Israeli future—in which be a symbol for the dwellings of our in negotiations to schedule Shavit’s talk Shavit believes wholeheartedly, he ancestors who wandered in Sinai?” Still later, someone who was not a farmer since last November and was rewarded says—depends on a more equal relation- built a sukkah in a village. What was the with a full house of eager and appre- ship with America built on two-way meaning of the first urban sukkah? We ciative audience members. And, not understanding and trust. He indicated do not know, but the people who built everyone had to show up in person. The that American Jews could teach liberal it were asking new questions. temple used this event to launch its new and centrist Israeli Jews a lot about I long for us to recreate our Judaism program to live stream servicesSEPTEMBER/OCTOBER and politics and lobbying, for example, 2012 and in the mold of Adam Two, the spiri- other important gatherings. (An audio only half-jokingly endorsed the idea of tual voice that is inside each of us. As tape of the full presentation and a video an “Israeli AIPAC” to steer the Knesset you might recall from my Yom Kippur of the last 45 minutes are available on toward more favorable U.S. policies. The CONTINUED ON PAGE 8 ; the Temple Micah website.) The lecture CONTINUED ON PAGE 6 ; 2 CHESHVAN/KISLEV/TEVET 5775 PRESIDENT’S COLUMN “ Every person shall sit under his grapevine or fig tree with no one to make him afraid.” MICAH, CHAPTER 4, VERSE 4 B’NAI MITZVAH: ENRICHING EXPERIENCE FOR ALL OF US Vine By Jodi Enda Vol. 50 No.2 The year started last November with tinue once or twice a week until their TEMPLE MICAH— Thomas and ends this month with b’nai mitzvah. In fifth grade, they begin A REFORM JEWISH CONGREGATION Dylan. In between, another 28 of their attending Machon Micah on Tuesdays 2829 Wisconsin Ave, NW seventh- and eighth-grade classmates after school, in addition to Sunday morn- Washington, D.C. 20007 would become a bar or bat mitzvah at ings and random other days for all-com- Voice: 202-342-9175 Temple Micah. munity events. Fax: 202-342-9179 Email: [email protected] My daughter, Ilana, Seventh grade is the crunch year, the [email protected] fell somewhere in the year many of our kids sacrifice most or Web: www.templemicah.org middle. all of their outside activities to pre- There is a consider- pare for their big day. They still attend Daniel G. Zemel RABBI able amount of contro- Machon Micah on Tuesdays and Sundays versy about b’nai mitz- and other days for all-community Esther Lederman ASSOCIATE RABBI vah in the United States events. They still have Skype tutoring these days. There is a once a week. In addition, beginning six Rachel Gross EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR fair amount at Temple months before their bar or bat mitz- Micah, as well. vah dates, they meet with cantor Meryl Josh Beraha RABBI, DIRECTOR OF They’re too much work and too Weiner or music director Teddy Klaus CONGREGATIONAL LEARNING time consuming, too indulgent and once a week to learn their Torah and Meryl Weiner waaaaayyyy too expensive. On Saturday Haftarah portions. They meet every CANTOR mornings, temple members are outnum- other week with teacher Ken Goldstein Teddy Klaus bered by students’ friends and rela- to explore the meaning of their Torah MUSIC DIRECTOR tives; it doesn’t feel like a real Shabbat. and Haftarah portions. They practice American synagogues have become bar their chanting most every night at home. BOARD OF DIRECTORS and bat mitzvah mills. Starting several weeks before their bar Jodi Enda To be sure, some of the criticism is or bat mitzvah, they also meet once a PRESIDENT valid, in full or in part. And at Temple week with one of our rabbis. They pose Ed Lazere Micah, we have changed the way we a question that the rabbi will address in VICE PRESIDENT prepare for and conduct b’nai mitzvah a sermon and discuss other things that Marc Levy services to address members’ concerns they don’t necessarily share with their VICE PRESIDENT and, I expect, will continue to do so. parents. At home, they write their D’var David Diskin We do not want to be a b’nai mitzvah Torah, a lesson about their portions. SECRETARY assembly line, a place where people On top of all that, they attend Shabbat Joel Korn check off a box and move on. We also services many Fridays and Saturdays, TREASURER do not want to lose Shabbat in all the both to lead prayers and to support Martha Adler hullaballoo that can surround a bar or their classmates as, one by one, they are Larry Bachorik bat mitzvah. called to the Torah. Sheri Blotner But the criticism doesn’t tell the For that six months, our kids practically Patty Brink entire story. It overlooks the most live at the temple. It’s a whirlwind for the Jeff Davis important part of the whole shebang: students and for their families, a crazy- Marina Fanning Helene Granof the meaning. And I’m not just talking busy time—and also an emotional one. Victoria Greenfield about the meaning for the student or I attended many b’nai mitzvah this Alison Harwood the family. Our b’nai mitzvah services past year. At every single one, I either carry a larger meaning for the whole teared up or cried outright when grand- VINE STAFF community of Micah and for the greater parents and parents passed the Torah Dorian Friedman community of Jews. to their children and grandchildren. I sat CO-EDITOR Honestly, it’s not all about the party. with other parents from the class, and Shelley Grossman Our kids spend years learning Hebrew many of them were wiping their eyes, CO-EDITOR and studying Judaism. Most enter too. To us, this was it. L’dor v’dor. We AURAS Design Machon Micah, our education program, knew the kids would chant well, because PRODUCTION in kindergarten or first grade. In third all our kids do. We knew they would grade, they begin one-on-one Hebrew give a good D’var Torah. We knew we’d tutoring via Skype, which they will con- CONTINUED ON PAGE 8 ; NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 3 YACHAD HONORS MICAH STALWARTS By the Editors Every spring for two neighborhoods throughout decades, Micah volunteers Washington.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy
    Order Code RL33530 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy Updated August 4, 2006 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy Summary After the first Gulf war, in 1991, a new peace process involved bilateral negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. On September 13, 1993, Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) signed a Declaration of Principles (DOP), providing for Palestinian empowerment and some territorial control. On October 26, 1994, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and King Hussein of Jordan signed a peace treaty. Israel and the Palestinians signed an Interim Self-Rule in the West Bank or Oslo II accord on September 28, 1995, which led to the formation of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to govern the West Bank and Gaza. The Palestinians and Israelis signed additional incremental accords in 1997, 1998, and 1999. Israeli-Syrian negotiations were intermittent and difficult, and were postponed indefinitely in 2000. On May 24, 2000, Israel unilaterally withdrew from south Lebanon after unsuccessful negotiations. From July 11 to 24, 2000, President Clinton held a summit with Israeli and Palestinian leaders at Camp David on final status issues, but they did not produce an accord. A Palestinian uprising or intifadah began that September. On February 6, 2001, Ariel Sharon was elected Prime Minister of Israel, and rejected steps taken at Camp David and afterwards. The post 9/11 war on terrorism prompted renewed U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel in the Occupied Territories Since 1967
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 The Last Colonialist: Israel in the Occupied Territories since 1967 ✦ RAFAEL REUVENY ith almost prophetic accuracy, Naguib Azoury, a Maronite Ottoman bu- reaucrat turned Arab patriot, wrote in 1905: “Two important phenom- W ena, of the same nature but opposed . are emerging at this moment in Asiatic Turkey. They are the awakening of the Arab nation and the latent effort of the Jews to reconstitute on a very large scale the ancient kingdom of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Shavit's Israel: Tragedy Or Triumph?
    Shavit’s Israel: Tragedy or Triumph? This is the first in a series of essays by Gidon D. Remba, which explores different facets of Israel’s predicament through a critical encounter with the work of Ari Shavit. (You may enter Shavit’s name in the upper corner search window for other discussions at this blog of Shavit’s views.) See Mr. Remba’s bio at the bottom of this post: With a heavy heart and a sharp ear, I went recently to hear Ari Shavit, the “centrist” Ha’aretz columnist and celebrated author of My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel, when he appeared in New York City at the Other Israel Film Festival. [Click here for a brief report on this event.] Like many others, I had found the book to be lyrically written, a love story and a thriller, an ode to Israel. But I was greatly troubled that nearly all the gushing reviews in the mainstream media had overlooked its gaping flaws.(1) Critical reviews, much needed antidotes, abounded in places like The New York Review of Books, +972 Magazine, Ha’aretz and Dissent, but were nowhere to be found in more widely read publications like The New York Times Book Review, or even the Atlantic and The New Republic. New Yorker editor David Remnick dubbed it “the most extraordinary book” on Israel in decades. Closer to the mark, Noam Sheizaf, writing in +972 Magazine, rightly called it a “conservative manifesto” that “views the conflict with the Palestinians as a zero-sum game that can’t really be solved.” Nathan Thrall marveled in The London Review of Books at how often Shavit has served as a “mouthpiece for [the views of] Netanyahu,” yet in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Benny Morris: Morality in the History of 1948 and the Creation of the Palestinian-Refugee Crisis
    The “Conversion” of Benny Morris: Morality in the History of 1948 and the Creation of the Palestinian-Refugee Crisis JOSIE GRAY The history surrounding the 1948 War and the creation of the Palestinian- refugee crisis continues to be contentious, political, and filled with questions of morality. This is especially true for Benny Morris’s historical work. As an Israeli historian, Morris has made significant contributions to the historiography of 1948, with most of his work focusing on the role that Jewish forces played in the expulsion of Palestinian Arabs in 1948 (something that the Israeli government had denied vehemently). Although celebrated for his historical work, following the collapse of the Palestinian-Israeli peace process in the early 2000s Morris publically announced his support for the expulsion of Palestinians in 1948 and argued that Jewish forces should have expelled every single Palestinian Arab. This paper discusses how a dual commitment to honest historical study and Zionism allowed Morris to announce his support for the atrocities that his own research had uncovered. On November 29, 1947, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 181, which approved the partition of Mandate Palestine, which had been under British rule since 1920. Although Arabs made up seventy-one per cent of the population, the partition plan allotted fifty-six per cent of the territory to a Jewish state with the Palestinian state receiving forty-two per cent.1 The proposed Jewish state would contain 499,000 Jews and 438,000 Arabs—a bare majority—while the proposed Palestinian state would have 818,000 Arabs and 10,000 Jews.2 The Jewish leadership accepted this plan; Arab representatives rejected it.
    [Show full text]
  • 'There Is a Clash of Civilisations': an Interview with Benny Morris
    AUTUMN / 2015 ‘There is a clash of civilisations’: An interview with Benny Morris by Gabriel Noah Brahm Historian Benny Morris at his home. Anna Loshkin. In this in-depth interview, Israeli historian Benny Morris speaks with Professor Gabriel Noah Brahm about his work, his critics and his regrets. He also charges Western academics with dishonesty about the Middle East, gives his prognosis for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and outlines his view of Israel’s place in the ‘Clash of Civilisations’. Compiled by the Faculty Action Network Benny Morris hasn’t changed. One of the world’s leading chroniclers of the Arab- Israeli conflict tells the truth as he sees it, based on the facts he discerns as a historian. While some have perceived a dramatic shift from the ‘old’ (more optimistic and liberal) Morris of the Oslo period to the ‘new’ (more realistic/pessimistic) Morris of today, this is something of a myth. He hasn’t changed what he says about the reality of 1948, the Palestinian refugees, or anything else. Rather, he has added, to his knowledge of the history of Israel’s rebirth as a modern nation-state, a painful analysis of more recent history. When Yasser Arafat walked away from Israeli peace offers in 2000 and 2001, a disillusioned Morris started to examine the possibility that the Palestinians weren’t serious about wanting a two-state deal. He has since come to rate more highly the importance of Islamism and jihadism as forces driving Palestinian rejectionism. Moreover, as a firebrand who tends to ‘call a spade a spade’, he is irked by a censorious political correctness that limits what can be talked about honestly — policing thought in line with ‘Western guilt’ over colonialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S
    Order Code RL33530 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy Updated September 21, 2006 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy Summary After the first Gulf war, in 1991, a new peace process involved bilateral negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon with mixed results. Milestones included the Israeli-Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Declaration of Principles (DOP) of September 13, 1991, providing for Palestinian empowerment and some territorial control; the Israeli-Jordanian peace treaty of October 26, 1994, and the Interim Self-Rule in the West Bank or Oslo II accord of September 28, 1995, which led to the formation of the Palestinian Authority (PA) to govern the West Bank and Gaza. However, Israeli-Syrian negotiations were intermittent and difficult, and postponed indefinitely in 2000. Negotiations with Lebanon also were unsuccessful, leading Israel to withdraw unilaterally from south Lebanon on May 24, 2000. President Clinton held a summit with Israeli and Palestinian leaders at Camp David on final status issues that July, but they did not produce an accord. A Palestinian uprising or intifadah began in September. On February 6, 2001, Ariel Sharon was elected Prime Minister of Israel, and rejected steps taken at Camp David and afterwards. The post 9/11 war on terrorism prompted renewed U.S. focus on a peace process, emphasizing as its goal a democratic Palestinian state as a precondition for achieving peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Reading
    Yom Ha’Atzmaut -- Between Redemption and Nakba: Living Within Two Competing Narratives Donniel Hartman Background reading 1. Ari Shavit, "Lydda," My Promised Land On July 11, two 3rd Regiment platoons advance from the conquered village of Daniyal toward the olive orchards separating Ben Shemen from Lydda. Strong machine gun fire from the outskirts of Lydda halts them. In the meantime, Moshe Dayan’s Regiment 89 arrives in Ben Shemen. By the water fountain Dr. Lehmann built for his Arab neighbors, Dayan forms the regiment into an armored column. One behind the other, they stand at the ready: a giant armored vehicle mounted with a cannon, menacing half-tracks, and machine-gun- equipped jeeps. In the late afternoon the column leaves Ben Shemen and speeds into the city of Lydda, firing at all in its way. In forty-seven minutes of blitz, more than a hundred Arab civilians are shot dead— women, children, old people. Regiment 89 loses nine of its men. In the early evening, the two 3rd Regiment platoons are able to penetrate Lydda. Within hours, their soldiers hold key positions in the city center and confine thousands of civilians in the Great Mosque, the small mosque, and the St. George’s cathedral. By evening, Zionism has taken the city of Lydda. The next day, two Jordanian armored vehicles enter the conquered city in error, setting off a new wave of violence. The Jordanian army is miles to the east, and the two vehicles have no military significance, but some of the citizens of Lydda mistakenly believe they are the harbingers of liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Norms, Diasporas, and Israel's Law of Return
    Democratic Norms, Diasporas, and Israel’s Law of Return By Alexander Yakobson and Amnon Rubinstein A Jewish and democratic [state]―there can be no such thing. Either it is “Jewish” or it is democratic. Otherwise this is just an attempt to evade the requirements of liberal democracy by using a worn-out gimmick: “Israel is a special case.” Israel can be a democratic state where most of its residents have some awareness and some connection to their Judaism, but any other interpretation serves to discriminate against the rights of the Arab minority.1 Writing in his column in Jerusalem’s local newspaper, Kol Ha’ir, the radical Israeli journalist Haim Baram thus summed up the central contemporary arguments against the democratic legitimacy of the definition of Israel as a Jewish state. Such a definition, Baram and others in Israel and beyond tell us, contradicts the “requirements of democratic liberalism”―a universal imperative that must not be violated, even on the grounds that the Israeli situation is unique. But why does Baram claim that Jewish state contradicts the principles of liberal democracy? Do universal democratic principles require the denial of the right of the Jewish people to self-determination? What is democratic and universal about an approach that accords the Palestinian Arab people the right to an independent state of its own, but declares the Jews ineligible for the same right? How does such an outlook harmonize with the slogan, “two states for two peoples,” or with the fact that, after all, the United Nations’ Partition Decision Resolution did give international normative approval to the creation of a “Jewish state?” The delegitimization of Israel as a Jewish state is not confined to the activists of the radical left or representatives of the Arab minority in Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Muting the Alarm Over the Israeli-Palestinian Conºict Muting the Alarm Over Jerome Slater the Israeli-Palestinian Conºict the New York Times Versus Haaretz, 2000–06
    Muting the Alarm over the Israeli-Palestinian Conºict Muting the Alarm over Jerome Slater the Israeli-Palestinian Conºict The New York Times versus Haaretz, 2000–06 In 2000 the Israeli- Palestinian negotiations for a two-state settlement ended in failure, and the Palestinian uprising (or intifada) broke out. Then, in early 2001 Ariel Sharon was elected prime minister of Israel. In 2006 three events dealt further setbacks to the “peace process”: the Israeli election of Ehud Olmert, the victory of Hamas in the Palestinian parliamentary elections, and the Lebanon war. Then, the 2007 civil conºict in Gaza between Hamas and Fatah ended with a Hamas victory. As a consequence of these events, the prospect for a two-state solution, necessitating negotiations to create a genuinely viable Palestinian state in Gaza and nearly all of the West Bank, is more elusive than ever. The underlying assumption of this article is that the present situation is di- sastrous not only for Israel and the Palestinians but also for U.S. national inter- ests. There is a wealth of information and critical commentary, much of it by Israelis, on the terrible consequences of Israel’s policies and behavior toward the Palestinians—and not just for the Palestinians but also for Israeli security, society, civil culture, and even the future of Israeli democracy. What is less understood—or even denied—is that U.S. support of Israeli pol- icies is gravely endangering critical U.S. national interests: it exacerbates the expanding threat of Islamic fanaticism; it undermines what remains of Middle Eastern stability and, in particular, threatens the conservative Arab regimes (especially Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan) with which the United States has de facto alliances; and should radicalism spread, it could threaten U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking at Israel Today Ronald Aronson Joseph Chuman Jeffrey L
    HUMANISTIC JUDAISM Volume XLIII 2015, Number 1 Looking at Israel Today Ronald Aronson Joseph Chuman Jeffrey L. Falick Gilbert Feldman Alan Dershowitz Erica Jonlin Marti Keller Wisdom from Wine: Israel and the Diaspora From Our New Rabbis Review of My Promised Land and more Humanistic Judaism is a voice for Jews who value their Jewish identity and who seek an alternative to conventional Judaism. Humanistic Judaism affirms the right of individuals to shape their own lives independent Humanistic Judaism is published twice a year by the of supernatural authority. Society for Humanistic Judaism, a non-profit organi- zation, 28611 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334, (248) 478-7610, [email protected], www.shj.org. Signed articles do not necessarily represent the viewpoints or policies of the Society for Humanistic Judaism. Transliterations used in articles reflect the author’s preferences. All material © Copyright 2015 by the Society for Humanistic Judaism. No portion of this work may be reprinted or copied without written permission of the publisher. Subscription Rates: $21.00 per year. Canadian Subscriptions $31.00. Overseas Subscriptions $43.00 per year (U.S. Dollars). No refunds. Sample copies available at single issue price plus postage. Addi- tional copies of a single issue are available from the Society for Humanistic Judaism at the cover price plus postage. Address all inquiries and subscriptions to Humanistic Judaism, 28611 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334. Indexed in Index to Jewish Periodicals, American Jewish Yearbook, Encyclopedia of Associations, and Standard Periodical Directory. Manuscripts are welcome and should be sent in care of the Editors, Humanistic Judaism, 28611 West Twelve Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT LAND GRAB Israel's Settlement Policy in the West Bank
    מרכז המידע הישראלי לזכויות האדם בשטחים (ע.ר.) B’Tselem – The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories D R A F T LAND GRAB Israel’s Settlement Policy in the West Bank May 2002 Researched and written by Yehezkel Lein in collaboration with the Eyal Weizman - architect Translated by Shaul Vardi and Zvi Shulman רחוב התעשייה 8 (קומה רביעית), ירושלים 93420, טלפון 6735599 (02), פקס 6749111 (02) 8 Hata’asiya St. (4th Floor),Talpiot, Jerusalem 93420, Tel. (02) 6735599, Fax (02) 6749111 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.btselem.org Table of Contents Introduction 2 Chapter One: Policy, Processes and Institutions: Basic Concepts 5 Chapter Two: The Settlements in International Law 20 Chapter Three: The Mechanism Used to Seize Control of Land 31 Chapter Four: The Annexation Policy and Local Government 52 Chapter Five: The Encouragement of Migration to the Settlements 60 Chapter Six: The Planning System 73 Chapter Seven: An Analysis of the Map of the West Bank 80 Chapter Eight: The Ari’el Settlement 102 Conclusions 109 2 Introduction In December 2001, a long article appeared in Ha’aretz under the headline “Five Minutes from Kfar Saba – A Look at the Ari’el Region.”1 The article reviewed the real estate situation in a number of “communities”2 adjacent to the Trans-Samaria Highway in the vicinity of Ari’el. The article included the information that most of the land on which these “communities” were established are “state-owned land,” and that “despite the security problems and the depressed state of the real estate market, the situation in these locales is not as bad as might be expected.” The perspective from which this article was written (the real estate market) and the terminology it employs largely reflect the process of the assimilation of the settlements into the State of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Right-Wing Political Cultures in Israel
    University of California Santa Barbara Constraints on Diplomacy: The Rise of Right-Wing Political Cultures in Israel A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Global and International Studies By: Shadi Jafari Committee in charge: Professor Paul Amar, Chair Professor Richard Falk Professor Esther Lezra June 2016 i The thesis of Shadi Jafari is approved. _____________________________________________ Professor Esther Lezra _____________________________________________ Professor Richard Falk _____________________________________________ Professor Paul Amar, Committee Chair June 2016 ii Constraints on Diplomacy: The Rise of Right-Wing Political Cultures in Israel Copyright © 2016 By: Shadi Jafari iii ABSTRACT Constraints on Diplomacy: The Rise of Right-Wing Political Cultures in Israel By Shadi Jafari In recent years, extreme right parties have received considerable electoral support and mounting influence in Israeli politics. This thesis will examine the Oslo Accords of 1993 as the catalyst of the new-radical right in Israel, and the state’s neoliberal economy that has shifted towards the manufacturing and export of advanced weapons and security expertise as the global factors that have shaped the rise of new right-wing political cultures in Israel. The study will then analyze the social factors that have appealed to the Israeli public to vote for parties that espouses radical-right views by exploring the influence of roughly one million Russian immigrants to Israel beginning in the 1990s, and the exploitation of existential fears experienced by most Jews. The study will specifically focus on two case studies: the 2014 war on Gaza, also known as Operation Protective Edge, and the reelection of Benjamin Netanyahu as the crystallization of a new-post peace extreme right-wing culture in Israel.
    [Show full text]