DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis As a Tool for Finding Principal Routes to Enhancing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis As a Tool for Finding Principal Routes to Enhancing Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis as a Tool for Finding Principal Routes to Enhancing Photosynthetic Efficiency A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Nicholas J. Tomeo August 2017 © 2017 Nicholas J. Tomeo. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis as a Tool for Finding Principal Routes to Enhancing Photosynthetic Efficiency by NICHOLAS J. TOMEO has been approved for the Department of Environmental and Plant Biology and the College of Arts and Sciences by David M. Rosenthal Assistant Professor of Environmental and Plant Biology Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract TOMEO, NICHOLAS J., Ph.D., August 2017, Environmental and Plant Biology Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis as a Tool for Finding Principal Routes to Enhancing Photosynthetic Efficiency Director of Dissertation: David M. Rosenthal Throughout this dissertation I approach the long-term aim of improving photosynthesis through the lens of natural genetic variation for photosynthesis. To date few studies have directly asked how photosynthetic variation might inform or provide the genetic material required to enhance photosynthesis, despite the clear utility of this strategy for other types of agronomic improvement. Of the many traits underling variation in photosynthesis, mesophyll conductance – the diffusional flux of CO2 through the leaf interior – has potential to improve both photosynthesis and water use efficiency. I assess genetic variation for photosynthesis among ecotypes of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and cultivars of soybean (Glycine max). In both species, and across both controlled and field environments in soybean, I find heritable genetic variation for mesophyll conductance that is positively correlated to variation in photosynthetic rate, indicating that selection to enhance mesophyll conductance will increase photosynthesis. Genetic variation in mesophyll conductance though was largely unrelated to variance in water use efficiency as a result of phenotypic correlation between stomatal and mesophyll conductance. If trait variation is to prove useful for crop breeding, that trait must not have already been improved in the varieties currently used by farmers. In soybean, photosynthesis has improved slightly with breeding for yield across a historical set of cultivars. Mesophyll conductance is not responsible for this increase in photosynthesis; it remains unchanged after 75 years of selection for yield. 4 Stomatal conductance is greater in modern varieties and I show that this increase scales from the leaf to the canopy. Greater canopy conductance in modern soybeans resulted in lower canopy temperatures and reduced leaf heat-stress. Few leaf-level photosynthetic traits were improved across this historical set of soybean cultivars. Given that I observed heritable genetic variation for mesophyll conductance among a small sampling of available soybean germplasm, there is substantial opportunity to harness this variation for the improvement of photosynthetic efficiency. 5 Dedication For her unwavering support and motivation, this work is dedicated to my wife Tiffany. 6 Table of Contents Page Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 3 Dedication ......................................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures .................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1. Background Material and Introduction to Proceeding Chapters .................... 12 Background ................................................................................................................. 12 Introduction to chapters ............................................................................................... 18 References .................................................................................................................. 19 Chapter 2. Natural Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis and Photorespiration Among Arabidopsis thaliana Ecotypes ........................................................................................ 29 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 29 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 30 Hypotheses and experimental overview .................................................................. 35 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 36 Plant material ........................................................................................................... 36 Gas exchange and associated measurements ....................................................... 38 Analysis of gas exchange data ................................................................................ 40 Statistical analysis ................................................................................................... 44 Results ......................................................................................................................... 44 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 48 Genetic variation in photosynthetic physiology ........................................................ 48 Coordination of photosynthetic drivers .................................................................... 49 Correlation of photosynthesis and photorespiration ................................................ 50 Drivers of variation in water use efficiency .............................................................. 51 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 54 References .................................................................................................................. 55 Chapter 3. Mesophyll Conductance Among Soybean Cultivars Sets a Tradeoff Between Photosynthesis and Water-Use ....................................................................................... 78 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 78 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 79 Results ......................................................................................................................... 83 Physiological and structural trait variation among cultivars ..................................... 85 Trait correlations with gm .......................................................................................... 86 Trait correlations were consistent between experiments ......................................... 89 Trait coordination ..................................................................................................... 89 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 91 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 97 Methods ....................................................................................................................... 98 Controlled environment experiment ......................................................................... 98 7 Field experiment ...................................................................................................... 98 Gas exchange measurements ................................................................................. 99 AN-Ci curves ........................................................................................................... 101 Variable-J gm calculation ........................................................................................ 102 Leaf morphology .................................................................................................... 104 Statistical analysis ................................................................................................. 105 References ................................................................................................................ 107 Chapter 4. Physiological Changes Across a Selection of Historical Soybean Cultivars 132 Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 132 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 133 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 136 Results ....................................................................................................................... 145 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 147 Conclusions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: the “METABOLISM” of ECOSYSTEMS
    7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: THE “METABOLISM” OF ECOSYSTEMS Ecologists use the term “productivity” to refer to the process through which an assemblage of organisms (e.g. a trophic level or ecosystem assimilates carbon. Primary producers (autotrophs) do this through photosynthesis; Secondary producers (heterotrophs) do it through the assimilation of the organic carbon in their food. Remember that all organic carbon in the food web is ultimately derived from primary production. DEFINITIONS Primary Productivity: Rate of conversion of CO2 to organic carbon (photosynthesis) per unit surface area of the earth, expressed either in terns of weight of carbon, or the equivalent calories e.g., g C m-2 year-1 Kcal m-2 year-1 Primary Production: Same as primary productivity, but usually expressed for a whole ecosystem e.g., tons year-1 for a lake, cornfield, forest, etc. NET vs. GROSS: For plants: Some of the organic carbon generated in plants through photosynthesis (using solar energy) is oxidized back to CO2 (releasing energy) through the respiration of the plants – RA. Gross Primary Production: (GPP) = Total amount of CO2 reduced to organic carbon by the plants per unit time Autotrophic Respiration: (RA) = Total amount of organic carbon that is respired (oxidized to CO2) by plants per unit time Net Primary Production (NPP) = GPP – RA The amount of organic carbon produced by plants that is not consumed by their own respiration. It is the increase in the plant biomass in the absence of herbivores. For an entire ecosystem: Some of the NPP of the plants is consumed (and respired) by herbivores and decomposers and oxidized back to CO2 (RH).
    [Show full text]
  • Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-Rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/428698; this version posted September 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Thermophilic Lithotrophy and Phototrophy in an Intertidal, Iron-rich, Geothermal Spring 2 3 Lewis M. Ward1,2,3*, Airi Idei4, Mayuko Nakagawa2,5, Yuichiro Ueno2,5,6, Woodward W. 4 Fischer3, Shawn E. McGlynn2* 5 6 1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 7 2. Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8550, Japan 8 3. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9 91125 USA 10 4. Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, 11 Japan 12 5. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, 13 152-8551, Japan 14 6. Department of Subsurface Geobiological Analysis and Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth 15 Science and Technology, Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan 16 Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] 17 18 Abstract 19 Hydrothermal systems, including terrestrial hot springs, contain diverse and systematic 20 arrays of geochemical conditions that vary over short spatial scales due to progressive interaction 21 between the reducing hydrothermal fluids, the oxygenated atmosphere, and in some cases 22 seawater. At Jinata Onsen, on Shikinejima Island, Japan, an intertidal, anoxic, iron- and 23 hydrogen-rich hot spring mixes with the oxygenated atmosphere and sulfate-rich seawater over 24 short spatial scales, creating an enormous range of redox environments over a distance ~10 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Photosynthesis System
    Portable Photosynthesis System Portable photosynthesis system ideal for measuring photosynthetic rate, Stomatal conductance, transpiration, ambient and differential CO2 and RH, Air Temperature, Leaf Temperature, PAR ( Photosynthetically Active Radiation), Ci, Atmospheric pressure. Should be able to use in field and lab and include fluorescence measurement and gas exchange. System to be supplied complete with following System Configuration: IRGA should be in the leaf chamber/cuvette, just below the leaf chamber/cuvette - for fast response System should have TOTAL 4 Infra-Red Gas Analyzers - Two Absolute CO2 and two absolute H2O Analyzers placed inside leaf chamber/cuvette to minimize time delay, fast equilibrium, avoid sorption of CO2 Gas and H2O (Water Vapor) through path tubing of sample chamber/leaf chamber to Analyzer. The instrument should display graphical and numerical measurement simultaneously in real time measurement. Leaf Chamber should be suitable for broadleaves as well as narrow leaves. Automated control for CO2, light, temperature and RH Instrument should have Fast Response Measurements of at least 10Hz Instrument should be capable of simultaneously measuring photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence Automated error notification and guided control settings Should be portable to use without field stand Instrument should have ETHERNET CONNECTVITY for remote access over internet/networking. System should have Operating temperature range: 0 – 50 °C System should have Storage temperature range: -20 °C – 60 °C System should have high user controlled flow rate ranging from 0-1400 μmol s-1 System should have built in pressure sensor ranging 50-100 kPa Power requirements: 12 – 18 VDC or 24 VDC Battery Type: 2-3 Nos. Lithium Ion Batteries- 6800mAh with external charger and option of internal charging ( more than 14 hours of performance).
    [Show full text]
  • Oscillatory Transpiration May Complicate Stomatal Conductance
    HORTSCIENCE 29(6):693–694. 1994. selected from a group of nine flowering roses; all nine plants had exhibited OT (monitored by sap-flow gauges and lysimeters) during nightly Oscillatory Transpiration May irradiance periods at some time within the previous 30 days. Root-zone moisture tension Complicate Stomatal Conductance and did not exceed 6 kPa, and the pot was foil- covered to reduce evaporation. On 2 May Gas-exchange Measurements 1993, GE measurement commenced at 2150 HR, when the rose plant was irradiated with l 2 high-pressure sodium lamps. Stomatal con- Mary Ann Rose and Mark A. Rose 2 ductance (mol CO2/m per see) and net CO2- Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University 2 exchange rate (CER, µmol CO2/m per see) of Park, PA 16802 the terminal leaflet of two fully mature leaves on separate branches were measured about Additional index words. Rosa hybrids, photosynthesis, sap-flow gauge, stomatal cycling every 10 min using a portable photosynthesis Abstract. A closed-loop photosynthesis system and a heat-balance sap-flow gauge inde- system (model 6200; LI-COR, Lincoln, Neb.); pendently confirmed oscillatory transpiration in a greenhouse-grown Rosa hybrids L. three consecutive 10-sec measurements were averaged. Environmental conditions were Repetitive sampling revealed 60-minute synchronized oscillations in CO2-exchange rate, stomatal conductance, and whole-plant sap-flow rate. To avoid confusing cyclical plant stable during measurements: average changes responses with random noise in measurement, we suggest that gas-exchange protocols in leaf temperature and relative humidity (RH) begin with frequent, repetitive measurements to determine whether transpiration is stable inside the 0.25-liter cuvette during each 10- or oscillating.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Photosynthesis and Respiration in an Aquatic Ecosystem
    Interactions between Photosynthesis and Respiration in an Aquatic Ecosystem Jane E. Caldwell and Kristi Teagarden 53 Campus Drive, P.O. Box 6057 Dept. of Biology West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 [email protected] (304)293-5201 extension 31459 [email protected] (304)293-5201 extension 31542 Abstract: Students measure the results of respiration and photosynthesis separately, combined, and in comparison to a non-living control “ecosystem”. The living ecosystem uses only snails and water plants. Oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia nitrogen concentrations are measured with simple colorimetric and titration water tests using commercially available kits. The exercise is designed for large enrollment non-majors labs, but modifications for large and small classrooms are described. Introduction This lab exercise was developed for a freshman course for non-science majors at West Virginia University. The exercise asks students to apply their knowledge of basic metabolic processes to a series of simple aquatic ecosystems, which students monitor through water testing. These ecosystems consist of aquaria containing plants and/or snails with or without light exposure, and are compared against a non-living control system (an aquarium with water, light, and gravel). As they analyze their results, students observe the interplay of respiration, photosynthesis, protein digestion (or waste excretion), and decomposition through their effects on dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia. Students synthesize these observations into written explanations of their results. During the course of the lab, students: • predict the relative levels of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia for various aquaria compared to a control aquarium. • observe and conduct titrimetric and colorimetric tests for dissolved compounds in water.
    [Show full text]
  • Photosynthesis Educational Resource Package for the LI-6400/LI-6400XT
    Photosynthesis Educational Resource Package For the LI-6400/LI-6400XT As part of the learn@LICOR initiative, LI-COR introduces the Photosynthesis Educational Resource Package, designed MODULES to assist educators in the teaching of laboratories using the Module 1: The LI-6400/6400XT Portable Photosynthesis LI-6400/6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System. System Experiment(s): Use Training DVD for LI-6400 “Teaching photosynthesis is incredi- basic setup bly complex and challenging. While Module 2: Photosynthesis Experiment(s): Measure light-saturated photo- students may become familiar with synthesis; Measure changes in photosynthesis words and descriptions of processes Module 3: Leaf Respiration such as electron transport, light Experiment(s): Measure varying respiration rates harvesting, oxygen evolution, and Module 4: Light Response Curve carbon fixation that are covered in Experiment(s): Light induction of sun and shade lectures, they may have only a very leaves; C3 and C4 light response curves shallow, and in some cases flawed, Module 5: Temperature Response Experiment(s): Optimum temperature of plants understanding of what these (Topt) processes really are unless some Module 6: A-Ci Response Experiment(s): A-Ci curve of C and C plants; form of experiments are performed 3 4 Calculate stomatal limitation in the lab.” Dr. Kent G. Apostol, Module 7: C3 and C4 Photosynthesis Bethel University. Experiment(s): Measure quantum use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants at different temperatures Module 8: Soil Respiration LI-COR scientists have collaborated with Dr. Jed Sparks, Experiment(s): Measure soil respiration changes Associate Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at due to moisture and nutrient availability Cornell University to design a series of lecture topics and exper- Module 9: Chlorophyll Fluorescence Experiment(s): Fv/Fm in dark-adapted control and Φ iments that feature the LI-6400/6400XT.
    [Show full text]
  • Photosynthesis and Respiration
    HIGH SCHOOL LIFE SCIENCE: PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION Standards Bundle Standards are listed within the bundle. Bundles are created with potential instructional use in mind, based upon potential for related phenomena that can be used throughout a unit. HS-LS1-5 Use a model to illustrate how photosynthesis transforms light energy into stored chemical energy. (SEP: 2; DCI: LS1.C; CCC: Systems, Energy/Matter) [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on illustrating inputs and outputs of matter and the transfer and transformation of energy in photosynthesis by plants and other photosynthesizing organisms. Examples of models could include diagrams, chemical equations, and conceptual models.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include specific biochemical steps.] HS-LS1-7 Use a model of the major inputs and outputs of cellular respiration (aerobic and anaerobic) to exemplify the chemical process in which the bonds of food molecules are broken, the bonds of new compounds are formed, and a net transfer of energy results. (SEP: 2; DCI: LS1.C; CCC: Energy/Matter)[Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on the conceptual understanding of the inputs and outputs of the process of cellular respiration.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment should not include identification of the steps or specific processes involved in cellular respiration.] HS-LS2-5 Develop a model to illustrate the role of photosynthesis and cellular respiration in the cycling of carbon among the biosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and geosphere. (SEP: 2; DCI: LS2.B, PS3.D; CCC: Systems) [Clarification Statement: Examples of models could include simulations and mathematical models.] [Assessment Boundary: Assessment does not include the specific chemical steps of photosynthesis and respiration.] Content Overview This section provides a generic overview of the content or disciplinary core ideas as an entry point to the standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The response of aphids to plant water stress - the case of Myzus persicae and Brassica oleracea var. capitata Citation for published version: Simpson, KLS, Jackson, G & Grace, J 2012, 'The response of aphids to plant water stress - the case of Myzus persicae and Brassica oleracea var. capitata', Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01216.x Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01216.x Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Entomologia experimentalis et applicata Publisher Rights Statement: Published version is available online at www.interscience.wiley.com copyright of Wiley-Blackwell (2012) General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 This is the author's final draft or 'post-print' version as submitted for publication. The final version is available online copyright of Wiley-Blackwell (2012) Cite As: Simpson, KLS, Jackson, G & Grace, J 2012, 'The response of aphids to plant water stress - the case of Myzus persicae and Brassica oleracea var.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Thermal Photosynthetic Responses of C4 Grasses Are Independent of the Biochemical Subtype
    Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 68, No. 20 pp. 5583–5597, 2017 doi:10.1093/jxb/erx350 Advance Access publication 16 October 2017 This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details) RESEARCH PAPER Short-term thermal photosynthetic responses of C4 grasses are independent of the biochemical subtype Balasaheb V. Sonawane1,†,*, Robert E. Sharwood2, Susanne von Caemmerer2, Spencer M. Whitney2 and Oula Ghannoum1 1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis and Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond NSW 2753, Australia 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis and Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] † Current address: School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA 99164-4236, USA Received 27 June 2017; Editorial decision 8 September 2017; Accepted 14 September 2017 Editor: Christine Raines, University of Essex Abstract C4 photosynthesis evolved independently many times, resulting in multiple biochemical pathways; however, little is known about how these different pathways respond to temperature. We investigated the photosynthetic responses of eight C4 grasses belonging to three biochemical subtypes (NADP-ME, PEP-CK, and NAD-ME) to four leaf tempera- tures (18, 25, 32, and 40 °C). We also explored whether the biochemical subtype influences the thermal responses of (i) in vitro PEPC (Vpmax) and Rubisco (Vcmax) maximal activities, (ii) initial slope (IS) and CO2-saturated rate (CSR) derived from the A-Ci curves, and (iii) CO2 leakage out of the bundle sheath estimated from carbon isotope discrimi- nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Production Ecology • Objectives – Overview of Forest Production Ecology • C Cycling – Primary Productivity of Trees and Forest Ecosystems
    Forest Production Ecology • Objectives – Overview of forest production ecology • C cycling – Primary productivity of trees and forest ecosystems … ecologists and ecosystem managers are unlikely to achieve desired management objectives unless they are familiar with the distribution and movements of energy that are responsible for the character and productivity of ecosystems under their management. (Kimmins 2004) – First: questions, take-home points, things you learned, etc. from reading assignment 1 Forest Production Ecology • Why should you care about C cycling? – C is the energy currency of all ecosystems • Plant (autotrophic) production is the base of almost all food/energy pyramids • Underlies all ecosystem goods & services – Plant C cycling, to a large extent, controls atmospheric CO2 concentrations (i.e., climate) • 3-4x as much C in terrestrial ecosystems as the atmosphere • Forests account for ~80% of global plant biomass and ~50% of global terrestrial productivity – C is fundamental to soil processes (i.e., SOM) • Belowground resources are a primary control over all ecosystem processes 2 Forest Production Ecology •Global Carbon Cycle ≈ “Breathing” of Earth 3 Forest Production Ecology • C enters via photosynthesis The C Bank Account 1. Gross Primary Production (GPP) •Total C input via photosynthesis 2. Accumulates in ecosystems (C pools/storage) as: (a) plant biomass; (b) SOM & microbial biomass; or (c) animal biomass 3. Returned to the atmosphere via: (a) respiration (R; auto- or hetero-trophic); (b) VOC emissions; or (c) disturbance Chapin et al. (2011) 4. Leached from or transferred laterally to another ecosystem Forest Production Ecology • Keys to understanding biological C cycling 1. Pools (storage) vs. fluxes (flows) of C • Live and dead (detrital) biomass • Above- and belowground 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Lithification in Marine Stromatolites and Hypersaline Mats
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Published in Trends in Microbiology 13,9 : 429-438, 2005, 1 which should be used for any reference to this work Microbial lithification in marine stromatolites and hypersaline mats Christophe Dupraz1 and Pieter T. Visscher2 1Institut de Ge´ ologie, Universite´ de Neuchaˆ tel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CP 2, CH-2007 Neuchaˆ tel, Switzerland 2Center for Integrative Geosciences, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, 1080 Shennecossett Road, Groton, Connecticut, 06340, USA Lithification in microbial ecosystems occurs when pre- crucial role in regulating sedimentation and global bio- cipitation of minerals outweighs dissolution. Although geochemical cycles. the formation of various minerals can result from After the decline of stromatolites in the late Proterozoic microbial metabolism, carbonate precipitation is pos- (ca. 543 million years before present), microbially induced sibly the most important process that impacts global and/or controlled precipitation continued throughout the carbon cycling. Recent investigations have produced geological record as an active and essential player in most models for stromatolite formation in open marine aquatic ecosystems [9,10]. Although less abundant than in environments and lithification in shallow hypersaline the Precambrian, microbial precipitation is observed in a lakes, which could be highly relevant for interpreting the multitude of semi-confined (physically or chemically)
    [Show full text]
  • Chloroplasts Are the Food Producers of the Cell. the Organelles Are Only Found in Plant Cells and Some Protists Such As Algae
    Name: ___________________________ Cell #2 H.W. due September 22nd, 2016 Period: _________ Chloroplasts are the food producers of the cell. The organelles are only found in plant cells and some protists such as algae. Animal cells do not have chloroplasts. Chloroplasts work to convert light energy of the Sun into sugars that can be used by cells. It is like a solar panel that changes sunlight energy into electric energy. The entire process is called photosynthesis and it all depends on the little green chlorophyll molecules in each chloroplast. In the process of photosynthesis, plants create sugars and release oxygen (O2). The oxygen released by the chloroplasts is the same oxygen you breathe every day. Chloroplasts are found in plant cells, but not in animal cells. The purpose of the chloroplast is to make sugars that feed the cell’s machinery. Photosynthesis is the process of a plant taking energy from the Sun and creating sugars. When the energy from the Sun hits a chloroplast and the chlorophyll molecules, light energy is converted into the chemical energy. Plants use water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight to make sugar and oxygen. During photosynthesis radiant energy or solar energy or light energy is transferred into chemical energy in the form of sugar (glucose). You already know that during photosynthesis plants make their own food. The food that the plant makes is in the form of sugar that is used to provide energy for the plant. The extra sugar that the plant does not use is stored as starch for later use. Mitochondria are known as the powerhouses of the cell.
    [Show full text]