DOCSLIB.ORG

Also Biography of Cullen's Two Biographers. in Short, Eighty-Four

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Also Biography of Cullen's Two Biographers. in Short, Eighty-Four 342 Reviews. [Oct. keview rv. 1. An Account of the Life, Lectures, and Writings of William Cullen, M.D., Professor of the Practice of Physic in the University of Edin- burgh. By John Thomson, M.D., F.E..S. L. <fc E., Professor of Medicine and General Pathology in the University of Edinburgh. In 2 vols. Vol. I. first published in 1832, now re-issued along with the second volume, and having prefixed to it a Biographical Notice of the Author. Yol. II. commenced by Dr John Thom- son and Dr. "William Thomson, and concluded by David Craigie, M.D., F.R.C.P.E., E.E..S.E., &c. &c.?Edinburgh and London. 1859. pp. 1524. 2. The Worlcs of William Cullen, M.D., Professor of the Practice of Physic in the University of Edinburgh; containing his Physiology, Nosology, and First Lines of the Practice of Physic, with numerous Extracts from his Manuscript Papers, and from his Treatise on the Materia Medina. Edited by John Thomson, M.D., F.P.SS. L. & E., &c. <fec. In 2 vols. 8vo.?Edinburgh. 1827. We hope that when, a year and a half ago, the bulky volumes which stand first of those prefixed to this article were given to the world, the editors did not delude themselves with the idea that their perusal from beginning to end was at all probable. Surely the commonest charity would forbid the imposition of such a task upon any but the most idle. It grieves us to state that a more injudicious compilation, or a more oppressive attempt at professional bookmaking, it has never been our lot to meet with. And the life and labours of such a mas- terly and perspicuous teacher as was Cullen have no business to be made a clog upon any library table, when we might have had a plea- sant and readable narrative of that illustrious physician. It would appear that in the year 1832 Dr. John Thomson, of Edinburgh, pub- lished that first volume of the 'Life of Cullen' with which most of us are familiar, giving assurance to the public that this instalment of biography should in due time be followed by a supplementary issue. This assurance, however, was not fulfilled until years after the death of the elder Thomson. The work, indeed, was in progress, but re- ceived a temporary interruption by the removal from Edinburgh to Glasgow of the author's eldest son, who had greatly assisted him in the compilation. The subsequent decline of the father's health, his death in 1846, the son's increasing professional duties in his new sphere, followed also by death in 1852, have thus, until recently, pre- vented the fulfilment of a design which both Dr. John and Dr. Wil- liam Thomson had deeply at heart, and for the accomplishment of which they laboured diligently. A younger brother and son (Dr. Allen Thomson) now appears upon the scene, and, charging himself with editorial superintendence, consigns a huge amount of historic labour to Dr. Craigie, contenting himself with a graceful dedication to Sir ?Benjamin Brodie, a history of family antecedents, and a general 1861.] William Cullen. 343 arrangement of this second volume. So that the work, in its complete and bi-volumed form, which has been thus launched upon the crowded and restless sea of literature, is something more than a biography of Cullen. It is, in fact, a biography of that great physician; but it is also a biography of Cullen's two biographers. In short, eighty-four Pages are devoted to a sketch of Dr. John Thomson, eight pages to a Notice of Dr. William Thomson, and the remaining fourteen hundred and thirty-two to matters which bear directly or indirectly upon the author of the ' Nosology' himself. We are not at all disposed to " question the rare learning in the general history of medicine" which Dr. Allen Thomson attributes to his friend Dr. Craigie; but we can- not help thinking that this very learning has been the cause of much irrelevant disquisition and of much intolerable prolixity. The amount ?f space, indeed, which is devoted to the conflicting opinions of those ^'ho may not have thought with Cullen is quite extraordinary; and the reader is lost in bewilderment at views and theories which might have been " buried in the night of oblivion," inasmuch as they are not ?nly not at all essential, but absolutely detrimental, to the elucidation ?f Cullen's career. To take one instance : in the second volume alone, two hundred and eighty-four pages (besides nine pages in the Appendix) are devoted to an elaborate disquisition of " Brunonianism," and to a history of the Italian medical doctrines therefrom. Who " springing ?n earth but an unhappy reviewer," to whom such things are a can afford time or for so minute an of the necessity," patience analysis new, perfect, and unalterable system" of Dr. John Brown 1 Even the editors themselves (we speak plurally) seem startled at the nature ?f the country over which they have dragged us, and lead us back again, after a protracted diversion, to the nominal subject of this Memoir, in the following language: " We have at length traversed the rugged and thorny regions of controversy and misrepresentation; of rival conflicting and disputed claims; of alleged discoveries, reforms, and improvements in medical theory and practice." (Vol. ii. p. 506.) It is to be wished that Drs. Allen Thomson and Craigie had been Under the pressure of a more condensed atmosphere than they appear to have breathed during the construction of this biography, and that they had been more mindful of what he whose theories they expound " has written : My business is not so much to explain how this and that happens, as to examine what is truly matter of fact; my anxiety 18 not so much to find out how it happens, as to find out what happens."* From a paucity of biographic materials, which the editors them- selves deplore, and which makes the great bulk of this work more ^excusable, we shall endeavour to furnish our readers with a com- pendious narrative of a who, without ever manifested a physician having high order of intellectual faculty, is yet more associated in our Poinds with the medical progress of the last century than any other ^dividual. William Cullen was the second of a family of seven sons and two * "Works, vol. i. p. 44?. 34.4 Reviews. [Oct. daughters, and was born at Hamilton, on the loth of April, 1710. At the grammar-school of that town, and afterwards in the University of Glasgow, he received his education, and cultivated those qualities by which he was ever afterwards distinguished?great quickness of appre- hension, and a very remarkable memory. In the great Scottish centre of industrial commerce he likewise initiated his medical career, being apprenticed to a general practitioner or apothecary of the name of Paisley. Finishing his studies there towards the end of 1729, the young Cullen went to London, with a view of obtaining a situation in which he might enjoy opportunities of acquiring a practical know- ledge of his profession. It is not narrated (though the subject is suggestive of speculation in reference to that puzzle of puzzles, a ' modern Bradshaw') what time was occupied in the transit from one city to the other. The fact, however, is on record that Mr. Paisley's pupil did not remain long in London, for he was almost immediately appointed surgeon to a merchant vessel trading to the Spanish colonies of the West Indies, whose captain was a Scotchman and a relation of his own. During the voyage thither, and there, he had the advantage of observing the diseases peculiar to those latitudes, and the effect of climate upon the human constitution. In the beginning of 1732 young Cullen returned to Scotland, to find himself the eldest surviving son, charged with the duties of arranging the affairs of his father (who had been dead some years), and providing for the educa- tion and settlement of the younger branches of the family. Fortunately for both parties, his late commander (Captain Cleland) had returned also to his patrimonial estate of Auchinlee, in the neighbourhood of Hamilton, and he invited "William Cullen to reside with him and superintend his son, who was afflicted with a lingering disorder. Here the young medicus had abundant opportunities of study, of which ho fully availed himself. Two years later, succeeding to a legacy by the death of a relative, he again crossed the Border, and resided with a dissenting minister in Northumberland, where he gave himself up to philosophy and general literature. The winter sessions of 1734.-5 and 1735-6 were spent in Edinburgh; but Cullen did not graduate in Those medicine until five years later, at the University of Glasgow. years were occupied in general practice in his native town, where the afterwards celebrated Dr. William Hunter (whose theological tenden- cies were diverted by Cullen) resided with him for awhile as friend and pupil. It is curious that after this relationship between them ceased, these two great men never met but once again, though they continued to the last to maintain an intimate and familiar corre- spondence. In the autumn of 174:4, Dr. Cullen, having been twice elected a borough magistrate, and once married, relinquished his general practice in Hamilton, and settled as a physician in Glasgow. The following extract from a letter of William Hunter to Cullen, in 1745, will be read with interest: " Well, how does the animal economy appear to you, now that you have examined it, as one may say, with precision ? I have good reason to put the question to you, because, in my little attempts that way, since I began to think.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jubilee Chronicon : a Valedictory Address Delivered on the Occasion
    : J JUBILEE CHRONICON A VALEDICTORY ADDRESS DELIVERED ON THE OCCASION OF RETIRING PROM THE CHAIR OF THE MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY 7th January 1874, RY P. D. HANDYSIDE, M.D. F. R. S. E., FORMERLY SENIOR PRESIDENT OP THE ROYAL MEDICAL SOPIKTV, AND SENIOR ACTING SURGEON TO THE ROYAL INFIRMARY TEACHER OF ; ANATOMY IN THE EDINBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE. " There is a history in all men's lives, Figuring the nature of the times deceas'd The ; which observ'd, a man may prophesy, With a near aim, of the main chance of things As yet not come to life ; which in their seeds, And weak beginnings, lie intreasured. Such things become the hatch and brood of time." Shakspere, ^EDINBURGH PRINTED FOR THE MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY, BY OLIVER AND BOYD, TWEEDDALE COURT. Reprinted from the Edinburgh Medical Journal. EXTRACT FROM THE MINUTES OF THE MEDICO-CHIBUBGICAL SOCIETY. " After Dr Haldane took the Chair, Dr Matthews Duncan moved a vote of thanks to Dr Handyside for his most valu- able, able, brilliant, and comprehensive Address ; and further moved that Dr Handyside be requested to allow his Address to be published at the Expense of the Society. Professor Spence briefly seconded the motion. Dr Handyside thanked the Society." D. R. Haldane, Pr. Extracted from Minutes by J. Chiene, Secretary. — CONTENTS. Historical Sketch, 5 I. Animal Physics, 10 II. Chemistry, 13 III. Zoology, . 14 IV. Anatomy, 20 V. Physiology, 25 VI. Pathology, including JEtiology, 29 VII. Materia Medica, 41 VIII. Therapeutics, including Hygiene, 43 IX. Surgery, including Ophthalmic, Aural, and Dental Surgery, . 53 X.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh
    This article was downloaded by: [130.132.123.28] On: 04 January 2015, At: 17:03 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tped18 Obituary Notice of the late Professor Oswald Heer Andrew Taylor Published online: 01 Dec 2010. To cite this article: Andrew Taylor (1886) Obituary Notice of the late Professor Oswald Heer , Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 16:1-4, 86-92, DOI: 10.1080/03746608609468233 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03746608609468233 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sketch of the Life and Writings of Robert Knox, the Anatomist
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com ASketchoftheLifeandWritingsRobertKnox,Anatomist HenryLonsdale V ROBERT KNOX. t Zs 2>. CS^jC<^7s><7 A SKETCH LIFE AND WRITINGS ROBERT KNOX THE ANA TOM/ST. His Pupil and Colleague, HENRY LONSDALE. ITmtfora : MACMILLAN AND CO. 1870. / *All Rights reserve'*.] LONDON : R. CLAV, SONS, AND TAYLOR, PRINTERS, BREAD STREET HILL. TO SIR WILLIAM FERGUSSON, Bart. F.R.S., SERJEANT-SURGEON TO THE QUEEN, AND PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND. MY DEAR FERGUSSON, I have very sincere pleasure in dedicating this volume to you, the favoured pupil, the zealous colleague, and attached friend of Dr. Robert Knox. In associating your excellent name with this Biography, I do honour to the memory of our Anatomical Teacher. I also gladly avail myself of this opportunity of paying a grateful tribute to our long and cordial friendship. Heartily rejoicing in your well-merited position as one of the leading representatives of British Surgery, I am, Ever yours faithfully, HENRY LONSDALE. Rose Hill, Carlisle, September 15, 1870. PREFACE. Shortly after the decease of Dr. Robert Knox (Dec. 1862), several friends solicited me to write his Life, but I respectfully declined, on the grounds that I had no literary experience, and that there were other pupils and associates of the Anatomist senior to myself, and much more competent to undertake his biography : moreover, I was borne down at the time by a domestic sorrow so trying that the seven years since elapsing have not entirely effaced its influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Glasgow University Library possesses an extensive collection of the papers of the Thomsons, a family of eminent nineteenth-century medical men. These form part of a larger set of Cullen-Thomson material. Some of these manuscripts were donated to the Library by John Millar Thomson in 1920; the remainder was discovered in the University Library Store in 1973. Among this latter set are a series of letters between Allen Thomson (1809-84) and William Sharpey (1802-80).' The bulk of this correspondence consists of letters from Sharpey to Thomson; but there are also several copies and drafts of the letters Thomson sent. These are valuable because Thomson's side of the correspondence has not otherwise survived. Letters from other individuals mentioned in the correspondence are also present. It seems that Thomson brought together all these letters, along with other documents, as sources for the obituary of Sharpey he was writing. A calendar of these letters will be found in the Appendix. This edition consists only of a selection of the letters. I have chosen those of most interest to the historian of medicine, and, in particular, those that bear on the roles played by Thomson and Sharpey as influential medical scientists and medical politicians in nineteenth-century Britain. Sharpey is the better-known of the two; he has been the subject of a lengthy article by D. W. Taylor.2 However, Taylor did not have access to a manuscript biography of Sharpey that Thomson composed in 1880, which provides much new information especially about Sharpey's early career.3 He was born at Arbroath in Forfarshire, Scotland in 1802, the stepson of a local medical practitioner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Teaching of William Sharpey (1802-1880) 'Father of Modern Physiology' in Britain
    THE LIFE AND TEACHING OF WILLIAM SHARPEY (1802-1880) 'FATHER OF MODERN PHYSIOLOGY' IN BRITAIN by D. W. TAYLOR PART I I. INTRODUCTION THE TITLE-PHRASE was used by E. A. Schifer,1 one of Sharpey's latest and most distinguished pupils, who throughout his life acknowledged his debt to his old teacher and who eventually added the name of Sharpey to his own.2 Such a phrase may be historically suspect but it represents an opinion subscribed to by many others, not only his pupils and colleagues. Burdon Sanderson, who succeeded him, wrote: 'If I, or any of the men I have mentioned, were asked to what circumstances the un- questionable productiveness of the University College School in scientific men is due, all would I think unhesitatingly attribute it to the influence of one man, Dr. Sharpey.'3 Much later, A. V. Hill said of him: 'by Sharpey's example, other medical schools were encouraged to start proper laboratories and adequate instruction in Physiology . to his fine judgement of men and to his power of inspiring them to original work, the present high position of British Physiology is due . .'.4 The British Medical Journal in its obituary notice, stated that 'for years he was the greatest teacher of anatomy and physiology in the country, occupying a position here equal to that held by Johannes Miiller in Germany.'" In his History of the Physiological Society, Schiifer (by then, Sir Edward Sharpey-Schafer) wrote that during a period when other experimental sciences were rapidly progressing, Physiology in this country could show no names worthy to be mentioned with those of Magendie, Bernard, MUller, Helmholtz or Ludwig...
    [Show full text]
  • Imperfect Notion at Present. the Faculty of Medical Professors Were
    Letter I 15th July 1836 My dear Sharpey, The day before yesterday I got a summons from Carswell' to see him in some way or other as soon as possible and when I called on him I found you were the subject of conversation. From what he said I think there is every likelihood ofyour being chosen by the Council of the London University, but of course we can have but a very imperfect notion at present. The Faculty of Medical professors were to meet today to discuss the matter & Carswell says that their suggestion is very generally attended to by the Council. Mayo2 seemed to have an inclination to offer himself and Grainger3 is I suppose a candidate but Carswell seems to think that others as well as he is himselfwill be for having you. I need not say what tumult of feelings all this raised in my mind. The emoluments ofthe situation appear to be nearly £800 a year and you will deliver your lectures in much more advantageous circumstances there than you can do in Edinburgh. [I]t increases your chances of the Edinburgh chair4 and of preferment in every way and as far as I can see is most advantageous for you. I wrote you thus promptly in case it were possible for me to be of any use to you in this matter. Write me at all events and let me know what you are thinking ofthe matter. I weary to hear something ofSurgeons Square.5 Indeed I feel melancholy whenever I think of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bench the Thomson Family Papers
    THE THOMSON FAMILY PAPERS THE BENCH A Wellcome Trust Funded Project The Thomson Family papers comprise medi- The University of Glasgow Library was cal papers, lecture notes, drawings and cor- awarded a grant from the Wellcome Trust to respondence of an eminent medical family: conserve and make these papers available biological scientist Allen Thomson (1809- to the public. 1884), his father John (1765-1846), a physi- cian and surgeon and his half brother Wil- The collection includes manuscript ink and liam (1802-1852). All three men held univer- printed papers, bound volumes, notebooks, sity posts in Glasgow or Edinburgh. There is pamphlets, tracings, applied seals, photo- a related collection of papers of William Cul- graphic material, watercolours and graphite len (1710–1790), used by John Thomson in drawings. preparing his 'An account of the life, lec- tures, and writings of William Cullen, Mechanical damage has led to surface dirt, MD' (first published 1832). This work was loss of size, running tears, loss of text and continued by Allen Thomson, who published missing areas, folds and creases, damaging a second volume of the work in 1859. repairs, with poor housing and storage prior to being received by the University. Chemi- William Cullen was a chemist and physician, cal damage has contributed to paper brittle- as well as a noted teacher of medicine. He ness and ink failure, water damage and dis- gave lectures in the theory and practice of colouration. physic at the University of Glasgow, and was appointed Professor of Medicine in 1751. A full conservation survey was carried out and has informed remedial treatment by Cullen’s papers include drafts of lectures, means of mechanical cleaning, iron gall ink medical notes, and letters sent and received and aqueous treatment where appropriate, by him.
    [Show full text]
  • Who, Where and When: the History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow
    Who, Where and When: The History & Constitution of the University of Glasgow Compiled by Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond © University of Glasgow, Michael Moss, Moira Rankin and Lesley Richmond, 2001 Published by University of Glasgow, G12 8QQ Typeset by Media Services, University of Glasgow Printed by 21 Colour, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4DB CIP Data for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 0 85261 734 8 All rights reserved. Contents Introduction 7 A Brief History 9 The University of Glasgow 9 Predecessor Institutions 12 Anderson’s College of Medicine 12 Glasgow Dental Hospital and School 13 Glasgow Veterinary College 13 Queen Margaret College 14 Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama 15 St Andrew’s College of Education 16 St Mungo’s College of Medicine 16 Trinity College 17 The Constitution 19 The Papal Bull 19 The Coat of Arms 22 Management 25 Chancellor 25 Rector 26 Principal and Vice-Chancellor 29 Vice-Principals 31 Dean of Faculties 32 University Court 34 Senatus Academicus 35 Management Group 37 General Council 38 Students’ Representative Council 40 Faculties 43 Arts 43 Biomedical and Life Sciences 44 Computing Science, Mathematics and Statistics 45 Divinity 45 Education 46 Engineering 47 Law and Financial Studies 48 Medicine 49 Physical Sciences 51 Science (1893-2000) 51 Social Sciences 52 Veterinary Medicine 53 History and Constitution Administration 55 Archive Services 55 Bedellus 57 Chaplaincies 58 Hunterian Museum and Art Gallery 60 Library 66 Registry 69 Affiliated Institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part One ISBN 0 902 198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART I A-J C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer of Bodies to the University of Edinburgh Ater the 1832 Anatomy
    HISTORY TRANSFER OF BODIES TO THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH AFTER THE 1832 ANATOMY ACT MH Kaufman, Professor of Anatomy, School of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland FACTORS THAT LED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE the scale of the activities of individuals such as Burke and 1832 ANATOMY ACT Hare in Edinburgh who are believed to have supplied Dr During the eighteenth century, the number of bodies Knox with at least 15 or 16 bodies of murdered victims (‘subjects’ or cadavers) that were legally transferred to during 1827–28. While Burke and his common-law wife named Anatomists or Surgeons in Edinburgh during any were put on trial, it was only because his accomplice Hare particular year was usually extremely small, depending turned King’s Evidence that Burke could be convicted of on the number of individuals who were sentenced by murder and was subsequently executed on 28 January the courts and executed by hanging. Accordingly, 1829.4 Due to similar events in London, the authorities additional bodies often had to be purchased from brought in an appropriate Act of Parliament to replace the professional grave robbers or resurrectionists, or 1752 Act.5 It was formerly believed that this would be an obtained by enthusiastic medical students who adequate deterrent, but this was clearly not the case. It occasionally went out on night forays to graveyards to was therefore replaced by the Anatomy Act of 1832.6 The obtain the bodies of recently buried individuals. Other preamble to this Act gives an indication as to why it was bodies, usually of individuals with abnormal skeletons, considered necessary to introduce such an Act before such as giants, dwarfs, individuals with hydrocephalus or Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Smallpox Inoculation in Britain, 1721-1830
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 1990 Pox Britannica: Smallpox Inoculation in Britain, 1721-1830 Deborah Christian Brunton University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Virus Diseases Commons Recommended Citation Brunton, Deborah Christian, "Pox Britannica: Smallpox Inoculation in Britain, 1721-1830" (1990). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 999. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/999 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/999 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pox Britannica: Smallpox Inoculation in Britain, 1721-1830 Abstract Inoculation has an important place in the history of medicine: not only was it the first form of preventive medicine but its history spans the so-called eighteenth century 'medical revolution'. A study of the myriad of pamphlets, books and articles on the controversial practice casts new light on these fundamental changes in the medical profession and medical practice. Whereas historians have associated the abandonment of old humoural theories and individualised therapy in favour of standardised techniques with the emergence of new institutions in the second half of the century, inoculation suggests that changes began as early as the 1720s. Though inoculation was initially accompanied by a highly individualised preparation of diet and drugs, more routinised sequences of therapy appeared the 1740s and by the late 1760s all inoculated patients followed exactly the same preparative regimen. This in turn made possible the institutionalised provision of inoculation, first through the system of poor relief, later by dispensaries and charitable societies.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUNONIANISM UNDER the BED: an ALTERNATIVE to UNIVERSITY MEDICINE in EDINBURGH in the 1780S
    Medical History, Supplement No. 8, 1988, 22-45. BRUNONIANISM UNDER THE BED: AN ALTERNATIVE TO UNIVERSITY MEDICINE IN EDINBURGH IN THE 1780s by MICHAEL BARFOOT* .... They agreed with me that it looked serious; but they both strongly dissented from the view I took of the treatment. We differed entirely in the conclusions which we drew from the patient's pulse. The two doctors, arguing from the rapidity ofthe beat, declared that a lowering treatment was the only treatment to be adopted. On my side, I admitted the rapidity of the pulse, but I also pointed to the alarming feebleness as indicating an exhausted condition of the system, and as showing a plain necessity for the administration ofstimulants. The two doctors were for keeping him on gruel, lemonade, barley-water, and so on. I was for giving him champagne, or brandy, ammonia and quinine. A serious difference of opinion, as you see! a difference between two physicians ofestablished local repute, and a stranger who was only an assistant in the house. For the first few days, I had no choice but to give way to my elders and betters; the patient steadily sinking all the time. I made a second attempt to appeal to the plain, undeniably plain, evidence of the pulse. Its rapidity was unchecked, and its feebleness had increased. The two doctors took offence at my obstinacy. They said, "Mr Jennings, either we manage this case, or you manage it. Which is it to be?" I said, "Gentlemen, give me five minutes to consider, and that plain question shall have a plain reply." When the time expired, I was ready with my answer.
    [Show full text]