On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Social Research Associates July 2015 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

This report has been commissioned by:

The Independent Transport Commission (ITC) is one of Britain’s leading research charities with a mission to explore all aspects of transport and land use policy. Through our independent research work and educational events we aim to improve and better inform public policy making. For more information on our current research and activities please see our website: www.theitc.org.uk

The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is the independent economic and safety regulator for Britain’s railways and the independent monitor of Highways England. We regulate the rail industry’s health and safety performance, we hold Network Rail and High Speed 1 (HS1) to account and we make sure that the rail industry is competitive and fair. From 1 April 2015 we have taken on responsibility for monitoring and enforcing the performance and efficiency of Highways England. www.orr.gov.uk

We also acknowledge the generosity of the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund (www.reesjeffreys.co.uk) which has supported this project with a major grant.

Published by:

Independent Transport Commission 70 Cowcross Street London EC1M 6EJ

Tel No: 0207 253 5510 www.theitc.org.uk

Registered Charity No. 1080134 July 2015 © Copyright Independent Transport Commission

ii INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Social Research Associates July 2015

iii On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

The ‘On the Move’ research project

This research project has its origin in the desire to understand changing patterns of road and rail travel behaviour in Britain. This resulted in the first ‘On the Move’ report in 2012, authored by Professor Peter Jones and Dr Scott Le Vine, which used the National Travel Survey to illustrate the dramatically shifting travel trends in Britain over the period 1995-2008.

The current report has been commissioned as part of the second phase in this research, through which the ITC and ORR are exploring the factors that are driving these changing travel trends. This report provides an overview of the attitudinal research work, and it will be supplemented by a series of technical Appendices covering the data and statistical results. These Appendices will be made available in electronic form online on the sponsors’ websites.

Acknowledgements

The ITC and ORR would like to thank Social Research Associates, and particularly Kris Beuret OBE and Kim Lampitt, for their work in compiling this report. We would also like to acknowledge the advice and input provided by the project steering group, which included Simon Linnett, Professor Peter Jones, Peter Headicar, Dr Matthew Niblett, Emily Bulman, Bright Pryde-Saha and Alan Feeney.

The sponsors would also like to thank the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund for the generous grant which contributed to this research. The ITC would also like to record its gratitude to its core subscribers, a list of whom can be found on the main ITC website.

Disclaimer

This report has been prepared for the Independent Transport Commission and Office of Rail and Road by Social Research Associates Ltd. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors, and the content of the report reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsoring parties. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material in this report, neither the sponsoring parties nor Social Research Associates shall be liable for any loss or damage arising in connection with the publication or use of this report or the information within. The authors and publishers give permission for the charts, text and analyses to be reprinted freely for non-commercial purposes, provided that due acknowledgement is made.

iv On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Foreword and Overview

This research study, exploring the reasons behind the changing patterns of behaviour in road and rail travel, has been sponsored by the Independent Transport Commission (ITC) and the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), and supported by a generous grant from the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund. Our interest in this fundamental topic originated in the first ‘On the Move’ study published in 2012 and authored by Dr Scott Le Vine and Professor Peter Jones (also co- sponsored by the RAC Foundation), which used the National Travel Survey to illustrate the dramatically changing travel trends in Britain over the period 1995-2008. This research demonstrated that road and rail travel trends were not behaving as the forecasting models had predicted, with car travel much lower than estimated while rail growth had significantly exceeded expectations. The ITC and ORR have therefore been keen to explore the drivers of these changing travel trends, in order to help the Department for Transport develop improved forecasting methods and to help policy makers better understand the future trajectory of these trends. The study before you is part of this collaborative venture. These issues are of crucial importance given the massive investment that has been promised in transport infrastructure over the next few years, including £15bn on the Government’s Road Investment Strategy by 2021, and £38bn on rail investment and upgrades over the period 2014-19. We offer this introduction to set these research findings in the wider context of policy making and to highlight the key findings. The framework for this study has been shaped by the need to explore changing attitudes among key groups in the population which might be expected to be influencing overall travel trends. Social Research Associates were commissioned to identify these key groups and conduct a wide-ranging attitudinal survey of their travel behaviour and choices. Preliminary analysis suggested that attention should be focused on the following key groups: • Younger people. The initial ‘On the Move’ study showed that changing behaviour among under-30s had made a particularly significant contribution to the overall trends, with young men less likely to use the car, and a slowing rate of growth in car use among young women coupled with a dramatic increase in their rail travel. • Older people. The over-55s have been the fastest growing age cohort amongst UK citizens and the initial report indicated that in this group car use was continuing to rise significantly. • Migrants and Minority Ethnic Groups. Inward net migration has contributed significantly to UK population growth in recent years, not only through EU migration but also through arrivals from India, Pakistan, Nigeria and China; while at the same time a number of minority ethnic groups have higher birth rates than the wider population and so these communities are expected to grow faster. • Business Travellers. The initial ‘On the Move’ study indicated that it was business travellers that had displayed the most noticeable shift from car travel to rail use, driven by changes in tax policies towards company cars.

v On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

To explore the significance of travel attitudes in these groups, the researchers focused particularly on issues that might be causing changes in travel choice. The questions included an exploration of the reasons for modal choice, the influence of technology, travel purpose, ‘tipping points’ affecting travel behaviour and whether current attitudes and behaviours were likely to be temporary or permanent. The findings reveal that the story of travel behaviour is complex and variable across the different groups. Some important themes have emerged. On the issue of modal choice the findings are striking in demonstrating that economic factors still remain a strong determinant of travel choice, with younger people especially concerned about the high cost of using a car relative to their income, including issues such as insurance, parking and learning to drive. The impact of concessionary and advance fares on public transport use is also an important driver, especially for younger people and pensioners. At the same time, location appears to be a key determinant for modal choice, due to the poor provision of public transport in rural areas. This is particularly the case with older people in rural areas who feel that they need to retain a car in order to preserve their independence. Modal choice also varies significantly across the different groups. The research demonstrates that young people are ‘falling out of love’ with the car, and place greater weight on alternative consumer products, while older people see the car as an important part of their lifestyle. At the same time, improvements in the accessibility of the public transport system are encouraging car owners to make more varied modal choices. Amongst minority ethnic groups and migrants, we see that most are much less car reliant, though there are some marked variations between groups. There also appears some evidence of a gender dimension in modal choice, with cycling more popular for men, while safety fears are a more prominent driver of choice for women who will sometimes prefer car travel over walking or cycling. Across almost all groups the research indicates that journeys are increasingly being split across different modes, and this suggests that the need for a fully integrated transport system is stronger than ever. The research reveals some interesting factors affecting how much these groups are travelling. This includes the impact of online commerce, with younger people much more open to new ways of shopping, such as click and collect from stations, which is enabling more shopping to take place without the need for a car. Perhaps surprisingly, environmental concerns do not appear to be a great driver of travel behaviour within these groups; nor does health seem to be a strong motivating factor for younger people. At the same time, increasing use of concessionary fares by older people appears to be increasing the amount of leisure travel that they undertake. A further key finding of the research is the impact of technology on travel attitudes and behaviour. The surveys showed that we are seeing changing attitudes towards the value of travel time, especially by business travellers using the train. Communications technology is also affecting modal choice, especially for younger people, who are attuned to using smartphones and tablets on the go, and this is also facilitating car sharing and leasing. Some evidence emerges that technology is helping to increase perceptions of safety on public transport. Far from contributing towards a decline in travel, the attitudes expressed in this research show the opposite, with social media facilitating new encounters, and business travellers believing that technology is actually increasing their need to travel.

vi INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

At the core of this research has been the desire to understand whether these attitudes are temporary or permanent features affecting travel behaviour. By comparing different age groups, it has been possible to see that there remain ‘tipping points’ in peoples’ lives at which point modal choice shifts. Such tipping points include starting a family, now more common in one’s 30s, at which point car ownership becomes more desirable; and also retirement, which often results in downsizing from a two to one car household. In spite of these factors, it is evident that across all groups we are seeing a rise in utilitarian attitudes towards car travel, which indicates that car ownership is likely to increasingly shift towards new forms of car access, such as car hire and car clubs. An equally significant factor pointing towards more permanent changes in attitudes is the way in which use of public transport modes when young increases the likelihood of continuing to use these later in life. It is striking that these changing attitudes towards modal choice appear not to be leading to a lesser desire to travel overall, and indeed almost all groups explored, except the elderly, expected their travel to increase over the next five years. What might these findings mean from a policy perspective? The implications seem to us to be various. First, the research implies that changing attitudes to travel among young people, including a lower priority placed on car ownership and greater use of public transport and cycling/walking, is likely to have a lasting effect, independently of economic factors (although the latter remain important). The need for investment in increasing capacity on public transport is therefore likely to remain strong. Second, the increasing preference across groups for multi-modal journeys suggests that efforts need to continue to improve modal integration and increase awareness of travel choices. The changing attitudes to car ownership also suggest that, although demand for road travel will continue to remain high, we must be prepared for new forms of car usage, including car hire and sharing, to flourish. This will increase the marginal cost of each car journey, with likely increases in demand for other forms of land-based travel. Finally, it is clear from this research that location and access to transport are key drivers of travel attitudes and choice. This indicates that transport must be fully integrated into land use and planning decisions, since much will depend on where new housing is built and its associated transport provision. The analysis in this report has been based on a large and broadly based sample of respondents using quotas rather than a random selection. It provides an insight into the travel attitudes expressed by members of the chosen groups, and the factors that are changing those attitudes. That said, the qualitative dimensions of this research do have limitations and it will need to be supplemented with further work to measure more precisely how these factors relate to one another. Such work will include analysis using new data sources to determine the relative scale of these drivers and how they might be measured. The sponsors suggest that further investment by the DfT and research bodies would be helpful in finding ways to measure these important factors and then use this information to develop more sophisticated forecasting and models. We will now be considering how to support further work in this area, and are particularly conscious of the need to determine how trends have changed during and after the great recession, as well as the need to probe further rail travel behaviour. We would like to thank the authors for this illuminating report and commend it to policy makers as we strive to understand how our travel patterns are changing. Independent Transport Commission Office of Rail and Road

vii On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

viii INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 01

1 Introduction and Methodology 08 1.1 The objectives 08 1.2 Summary of research and methodology 08 1.3 The use of qualitative research 10 1.4 Group interviews and interpreting attitudinal research results 10 1.5 Face to face interview surveys 11 1.6 Online surveys 11 1.7 Facebook survey 12 1.8 Panel based national surveys 12 1.9 Analysis 13

2 Literature Review 14 2.1 Objectives 14 2.2 Older people 15 2.3 Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups 16 2.4 Migrant groups 17 2.5 Business travellers 18 2.6 Conclusion 18

3 RESULTS: Young People 19 3.1 Introduction and methodology 19 3.2 Why has driving especially by young men declined? 21 3.3 Car insurance costs are perceived to be higher for men than women 21 3.4 Demographic and lifestyle influences 25 3.5 Attitudes to public transport 26 3.6 Rail use 27 3.7 Cycling and walking 28 3.8 Lack of parking 29 3.9 Leisure activities especially drinking 30 3.10 Technology and social media 30

ix On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

3.11 Health 31 3.12 Environmental and safety concerns 31 3.13 Will the decline in driving by young men continue? 31 3.14 Future plans for car ownership 34 3.15 Conclusion 35

4 RESULTS: Older People 36 4.1 Demographic profile 36 4.2 Attitudes to travel 37 4.3 Future trends 39 4.4 Conclusion 40

5 RESULTS: Business Travellers 41 5.1 Commuting and inter-work travel distinctions 41 5.2 Are attitudes to commuting changing? 43 5.3 Are inter-work patterns of travel changing? 44 5.4 Conclusion 46

6 RESULTS: Migrants 47 6.1 Less car use and more walking 47 6.2 Locality 49 6.3 Length of residence 49 6.4 Cultural comparisons and influences 49 6.5 Attitudes to car ownership 50 6.6 Coaches 52 6.7 Legislative issues 52 6.8 Left hand driving 53 6.9 Conclusion 53

7 RESULTS: BAME groups 54 7.1 Demographic factors 54 7.2 The Indian community compared to other BAME groups 55 7.3 Aspirations of all BAME groups 58 7.4 Other modes of travel 61 7.5 Conclusion 61

x INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

8 Reflections on the Results 62 8.1 Wider discussions 62 8.2 Car ownership versus use 62 8.3 New patterns of shopping 62 8.4 The role of technology 63

9 Conclusion 64 9.1 A strong desire to travel more 64 9.2 Changes in attitude to modal choice 65 9.3 Young people 67 9.4 Older people 67 9.5 Commuters and business travellers 67 9.6 Migrants 68 9.7 Black, Asian and ethnic minority groups 68 9.8 Overall 69

Appendices (Available online at www.theitc.org.uk ) Appendix A Interview and Questionnaire Schedules Appendix B Data and Literature Review Appendix C Discussion Group summaries Appendix D Statistical Results

xi On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Table of Charts

Chart 1 Most reported countries of birth of non-UK born usual residents 17

Chart 2 First ranking preference (ALL n = 2,231) 21

Chart 3 First preference for reasons for not driving 23

Chart 4 Top three priorities by age group 24

Chart 5 Main mode of transport for short local trips by sex 29

Chart 6 Short local trips by car ownership 32

Chart 7 Long trips by car ownership 32

Chart 8 Licence holding by age group 32

Chart 9 Car ownership by age 33

Chart 10 Main mode of transport for short local trips by age 33

Chart 11 Main mode of transport for long trips by age 33

Chart 12 Would you like to own a car at the moment? (non-car owners =704) 34

Chart 13 Would you like to have a car some day in the future (non car owners =704) 34

Chart 14 Car ownership by residential area 36

Chart 15 Licence holding by residential area 36

Chart 16 Thinking about the long term future do you think you will be traveling more or less than you do now in general? 37

Chart 17 Would you say your general travel patterns have changed in the last two years? 41

Chart 18 How would you say your general travel patterns have changed in the last two years? 41

Chart 19 Mode of travel - Car 41

Chart 20 Mode of travel - Train 42

Chart 21 Mode of travel - Walk 42

xii INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Chart 22 Mode of travel - Cycling 42

Chart 23 Socio-Economic Group values 44

Chart 24 Main mode of travel for work 45

Chart 25 Household car ownership 45

Chart 26 Is a new car a priority? 46

Chart 27 Sample profile 47

Chart 28 Socio-Economic Group value 48

Chart 29 Modal choice 48

Chart 30 Car ownership 50

Chart 31 Do you expect to have a car in the coming year 51

Chart 32 Residential area 54

Chart 33 Socio-Economic Group values 55

Chart 34 Household car ownership 56

Chart 35 Licence holding 56

Chart 36 Would you say your general travel patterns have changed in the last two years 57

Chart 37 Modal choice 57

Chart 38 Thinking about the long term future do you think you will be travelling more or less than you do now for work? 58

Chart 39 Thinking about the long term future do you think you will be travelling more or less than you do now for shopping? 59

Chart 40 Do you expect to have a new car in the coming year or so? 60

Chart 41 Is a new car a priority? 60

Chart 42 Travel more or less in the past two years 64

Chart 43 Travel more or less in the future 65

Chart 44 Change of travel mode in the last two years 66

xiii On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Executive Summary

‘Peak car’ or temporary blip?

1. There is an ongoing debate in the UK about whether we have reached ‘Peak Car’ - namely that car use per driver has reached its peak and will continue to fall especially in large cities which now contain the majority and a growing proportion of the population. In contrast, some see the recent decline in road mileage per driver as a temporary effect of the recession. Clearly there are important implications for future investment in transport. 2. To inform this debate, the Independent Transport Commission (ITC) together with co-sponsors the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), the RAC Foundation and Transport Scotland commissioned a series of linked research studies under the general title ‘On the Move’. The first study which is already published and now being updated examines the data available from recent National Travel Surveys1. The second strand of research, reported here, has been co-sponsored with the ORR and supported with a grant from the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund. It examines changing attitudes to car ownership, driving and public transport use on the part of different demographic groups – namely 17 - 40 year olds, over 55 year olds, business travellers, migrants and different ethnic groups. The third (in preparation) will examine non-transport data to throw light on general trends in lifestyles as they impact on travel. The overall aim is to use the cumulative insights to inform the Department for Transport’s national model and its associated policy implications. The research method

3. Groups of people ranging from small family and neighbours to formal focus groups were held around England. In addition a Facebook and electronic panel surveys were organised. In total around 4,700 people took part comprising a cross section by age, sex, region, car ownership and licence holding. The analysis was based on cross tabulation to highlight differences since much of the sampling was based on quotas rather than random selection. The research was designed to produce a combination of quantitative and qualitative data and discussions about attitudes towards car use and travel in general (i.e. “the why of the what”). In particular the research design was able to understand how transport changes are associated with life stages – which traditional ‘snap shot’ surveys cannot address.

1 1 http://www.theitc.org.uk/docs/47.pdf. On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Summary of participants

Young people People aged Older people Commuter Migrants Black Asian <30 30-42 55+ and Business Ethnic Minority Travellers Groups 1940 1054 824 732 625 751 Key findings

Young people 4. The vast majority of young people cite cost factors as the main reason why they are driving less. But this is not the whole story since even those who did own cars often prefer to travel by public transport, walking or cycling (41% of all short trips and 27% of long trips). There is also a growing number of young people who say they don’t ever want a car and this increases with age. Thus 15% of non-car owners aged 17-29 don’t want a car in the future compared to twice as many (32%) of non-car owners aged 30-42. Summary of the ‘push pull’ factors identified All young people • An increasing number of young people are going to university and accumulating debts. • Real wages and employment rates for young people have declined especially during the recession. • Concessionary travel, advance rail fares, car sharing, car clubs are cheaper for travel than running a car. • Parking at university and college campuses and at work places in urban areas is limited. • The quality of public transport is improving. • Car ownership and especially high end cars don’t lead to higher status in the eyes of other young people. Why particularly young men? • Young men form partnerships and become fathers at later ages compared to women – the larger the number travelling in the group, the cheaper it is to travel by car. • Cars are becoming less attractive than alternative consumer products especially technological or music related. • Young men like the ‘freedom’ associated with cycling and are more receptive to cycling for health motives than young women. • Young men are less concerned about personal safety than women.

2 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

5. The research was also concerned to explore whether young people would ‘catch up’ with rates of car ownership once they reached their 30s and there was much uncertainty about the answer to this. One of the causes of uncertainly is the ability of today’s 20-29 year olds to continue with their lifestyles when they form partnerships and have children. A key difficulty is the lack of suitable housing and other facilities such as schools for families in central urban areas where most young people have lived as singles in their 20s and in an ideal world where they would like to continue living. Another difficulty is the cost of housing in city centres. This combination of reasons often drives young families out to the suburbs even though they would prefer to maintain their urban lifestyle with good access to public transport and walking destinations. Once in the suburbs, car ownership becomes a greater convenience and for some essential. 6. However, it is also apparent that this generation of 20 year olds and indeed also many in their 30s are unlikely to resort to the levels of car ownership or use of previous generations. Their attitudes are very different in two crucial aspects. First they have learnt about how to use the public transport system which at least in urban and along intercity routes is improving and resulting in generally positive experiences. The second reason for car use continuing to decline is the reallocation of road space away from cars including bus lanes, good walking environments, wide pavements and cycle lanes which make the car journey longer and incline people to stick to alternatives. 7. Another factor is the growing tendency to separate the idea of car ownership from use and in turn consider alternative forms of car use such as car clubs, car hire or lift sharing and the growing number of hybrid combinations in between such as web based shared taxis or ‘hitchhiking’ such as BlaBla Car. These trends also point to a decline in second car ownership and an associated increase in the use of public transport, cycling and especially walking which distinguishes one car from two car household patterns of travel.

Older people 8. The most significant differences in travel patterns of the over 55 year olds related to residential location with both car ownership and licence holding increasing from urban through suburban to rural. Thus in rural areas 78% had a full driving licence but in urban areas only 54% and more of the latter never drove. 9. However, this is only part of the story. The research also shows that older people are using a wider range of modes and are less likely to rely on cars even when they own one. This change is in part due to the availability of concessionary fares or free travel and there is resentment that these cannot be used in some rural areas. For the growing number of older people still working, free bus passes and senior rail discounts are especially attractive. A second influence is the desire to travel especially for leisure and family visiting and many older people are choosing to move to places which provide good public transport links to safeguard their mobility should they or their partner be unable to drive. This might put further pressure on urban property but it is counter balanced by the desire to downsize and release equity which is best achieved by moving away from city centres. The latter could be a positive strategy for the economy of some of the UK’s seaside towns and the full report includes a case study of Saltburn where this seems to be happening.

3

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

15. The mode of transport used for commuting varies by location and parking availability. Inevitably jobs in city centres were increasingly difficult for car travel due to both longer travel times and reduction in parking opportunities. Fixed public transport routes were preferred for commuting although there was a lot of detailed knowledge of options with some combining modes such as train/cycle or train/walk to outside central zones in order to reduce costs. In contrast, suburban work locations were often described as difficult to get to by public transport and in spite of some examples of work based car sharing schemes, most people working in these areas drove by themselves and indeed some companies had moved from city centres exactly to facilitate this.

16. Apart from commuting, there is also undoubtedly some travel substitution for business travel by methods such as video conferencing (e.g. with Skype) but this does not seem to result in less travel overall – rather it leads to wider networking and there is still a strong desire for face to face meetings. The ability to work whilst travelling for business is a key explanation for modal choice with facilities on trains and planes much discussed. An interesting finding was a growing tendency to use cars as mobile offices on grounds of convenience and privacy and some ingenious adaptations such as fold down desks and other equipment were described.

Migrants 17. Both the country of origin and the planned length of stay in the UK affect car ownership rates. Our sample based on people who had moved within the last ten years, was 40% from EU countries, a third from commonwealth countries and the rest from other places. They were disproportionately from lower paid occupational groups compared to non-migrants and also more likely to live in urban areas – often in cultural and country of origin clusters. These factors led to distinct travel patterns which were further influenced by the need to prioritise housing costs and the desire to travel to their country of origin for visits – usually by air. The result is relatively low rates of car ownership and much higher rates of walking with 80% reporting that they were unlikely to acquire a car in the immediate future compared with 50% of non- migrants. 18. Nevertheless, some migrants needed a car (or often a van) for work and there was a tendency to car share especially by East European migrants where the norm in their home countries was to insure the vehicle rather than the individual driver.

5 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

19. Length of residence was another key factor in influencing travel and the longer migrants had been in the UK, the nearer they moved to indigenous rates of car ownership. However, the habit of walking and proximity to destinations is likely to continue so overall car ownership is unlikely to increase as fast as the population growth of this group would otherwise indicate.

Black, Asian and ethnic minority groups 20. There are clear differences in attitudes and patterns of travel between ethnic groups with some having more in common with the white UK group than other BAME groups a factor related to both socio economic status and to a lesser extent specific cultures. The report highlights the Indian Sikh and Hindu communities as an example of high commitment to car ownership with 60% of this group judging a new car to be a priority compared to only 29% of Africans. 21. However, as with the migrant groups, BAME groups are more likely to live in urban areas and in clusters based on ethnicity; so many of the differences in travel relate to the greater opportunities for using public transport or walking in urban areas. Nevertheless, moving out is taking place due to the push factor of rising housing costs in central urban areas especially London and there was agreement that this will increase car use. 22. Nevertheless BAME groups in general have stronger aspirations to car ownership and are less inclined to use other modes especially cycling. Even train is considered less often since once a car is acquired this tends to be the default method both for reasons of status and the economics of travelling with larger family groups.

23. In addition, aspirations lead to plans to move away from the inner city but still to return for shopping, religious venues and to a lesser extent work. This results in a network of cross city or cross country routes – the latter often provided by specialist coach services.

6 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Conclusion

24. The research has shown major differences in travel between the groups studied although with urban/suburban/rural and socio economic differences frequently proving the most influential variable. As the proportion living in urban areas increases, both car ownership and car use is bound to decline. 25. Some groups are exhibiting bigger changes in attitude to car ownership than others especially young people but all groups are acquiring knowledge of public transport systems and are increasingly unlikely to see the car as the automatic default choice. This in turn is breaking the link between car use and car ownership and reducing the status of cars as statement consumer goods. 26. Technology is enabling more diverse work travel patterns and affecting both commuting and business travel. A reduction in either commuting or business travel through working at home does not automatically lead to a reduction in total travel since many people still make trips for other purposes during the time gained. 27. These and other key findings from the research show both the success of past policy interventions to encourage less car travel and the enormous potential for future opportunities to move towards more strategic approaches to transport provision.

7 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

1. Introduction and Methodology

1.1 The objectives

1.1.1 Our recent co-sponsored ‘On the Move’ report2 showed significant changes in British car and rail travel trends since the 1990s. 1.1.2 Summary of key findings • Younger male drivers have reduced their car use. • Women and older people are driving more than in previous generations. • Male car driving mileage is particularly affected by declining company car ownership leading to a switch to rail for business travel. • The number of rail journeys (but not their length) is increasing due to an expanded market base and there is some correlation with reduced driving for business purposes. • London has patterns of travel distinct from the rest of GB: car travel has seen a major decline in London, while in rural areas it is on the increase. • There is some evidence that immigrants exhibit different travel behaviour, including driving less, compared to those born here. 1.1.3 Following presentations and discussions of these findings it was clear that there was a need to understand more about the reasons and in particular to gauge the extent to which these changes were a temporary effect of the recession or more permanent. 1.1.4 The research, although focused on UK, is of wider interest since the same decline in personal car mileage has been witnessed in many other industrial countries. 1.2 Summary of research and methodology

1.2.1 The research summary: chronology, numbers and locations Table 1 Research summary

Stage 1 Jan-Feb 2013 Pilot Study Groups 100 participants Stage 2 April-May 2014 15 Neighbourhood 215 participants discussions and 143 Focus Groups with young people April 2014 Facebook survey 336 respondents May 2014 Electronic Survey 1,700 respondents targeting young people Stage 3 October 2014 -January 13 Focus groups 108 participants 2015 January – March 2015 Face to Face interviews 1,277 respondents April 2015 Electronic Survey 953 respondents Total 4,690

2 See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20526328 and also the full report at http://www.racfoundation.org/research/mobility/on-the-move-main-research-page 3 Section 3 Results - Young People 8 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Figure 1 Map detailing discussion groups and survey locations

Online Survey (UK only) Focus groups (England and Wales only) Face to face surveys (England and Wales only)

Redcar Bradford Preston Leeds

Manchester

Bangor Lincoln Birmingham Peterborough Leicestershire

Worcester Luton

Swansea London Cardiff Woking Exeter Brighton and Hove

Devon

1.2.2 Stage 3 group quotas

Young People Older Commuter Migrants Black Asian people aged people and <10 yrs in Ethnic <30 30-42 55+ Business UK Minority Travellers Groups 532 870 824 732 625 751

In addition people took part in neighbourhood discussion or focus groups - 356 1.2.3 Full demographic, statistical results, discussion group and quantitative summaries are shown in Appendices A-D and in an accompanying CD.

9 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

1.3 The use of qualitative research

1.3.1 Qualitative research is designed to enable an understanding of motivations which underlie patterns of behaviour. Qualitative research acknowledges that people are not entirely rational beings and that although economics is a powerful influencer it is not the only explanatory factor and that it is therefore important to carry out research to understand ‘the why of the what’. A key concept driving this approach is the role of perception which often varies from the ‘reality’ of quantitative facts but which can be a powerful explanation of beliefs, attitudes or behaviour. Changes to behaviour do not always follow attitudes or beliefs however. This may be due to legislation rendering some actions illegal, economic factors such as not having enough money or simply lack of supply. 1.3.2 Typical methods for qualitative research include individual interviews, focus groups or surveys with open ended questions and all three were used to inform this research. 1.4 Group interviews and interpreting attitudinal research results

1.4.1 In interpreting the results it is important to bear in mind that although some reasons for behaviour may be rated highly, the final travel decision is frequently due to a combination of factors which can be illustrated with the image of a palette. In this light the device of asking people to rank reasons for behavioural change is strictly limited albeit sometimes useful in triggering discussion and giving some indication of the decision making process. In contrast, the discussions which took place during this research throw interesting light on some of these ‘tipping’ factors’ which are otherwise lost in more limited rating exercises4.

Personal Economic Constraints Factors Smart Phones Occupation

Environment

Theory Test

Safety & Security Parking

4 This factor was well demonstrated by research for Transport Direct based on detailed travel planning diaries and which developed the concept of a palette to explain final travel choices. This concept was also built into a redesign of the Transport Direct portal which offered the capacity to customise journeys. SRA (2005) Transport Direct Market Research – 3 vols (DfT) 10 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

1.4.2 The discussion topics included: • The history of travel patterns • Reasons for driving or not driving • Prioritising these reasons – self and others • Attitudes to public transport – rail, bus, cycling, walking • Effects of driving or not driving • Views about travel in the future • Travel and demographic profiles 1.5 Face to face interview surveys

1.5.1 These interviews were carried out at a range of geographical locations and venues around the UK including in public places targeting business, migrant, black, Asian and minority ethnic groups (BAME), older and younger people, since these were the groups highlighted in the quantitative phase as having travel changes which needed further explanation. 1.5.2 The 42 discussion groups and 1,271 face to face interviews were held in locations around the UK as shown in Figure 1. 1.6 Online surveys

1.6.1 This research method was designed to use electronic and social media to achieve larger samples to check and compare against the results of the focus groups. The samples were drawn from around the UK in proportion to the population density of the target groups. Appendix A shows the electronic questionnaire schedules.

11 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

1.7 Facebook survey

1.7.1 Online survey promotion via social media for trending is a cost- effective targeted solution and it is being increasingly used by the market research industry since it produces a large body of replies from targeted groups – in this case young people, non-drivers from middle and higher income groups and high users of rail – all of whom are also more likely to use social media. We therefore linked to the “About Me” section of Facebook and filtered our requests by factors such as education, age or employment thus creating the same subgroups as set up for the focus groups to compare driving and lifestyles. An advantage of this approach is that it kept project costs down to a minimum because the money spent goes straight at targeting the right audience where changing attitudes are most stark. To encourage a strong response, small prizes were offered to those who reply to the surveys which encouraged participants to share it with friends, which is one of the strengths of social media. In the event 336 responses were received by this method over two weeks. 1.8 Panel based national surveys

1.8.1 Two national electronic surveys were commissioned from Panelbase. The first was sent to a representative sample of 1,700 17-42 year olds and the second to 1,000 people in the four target groups to boost numbers and enable robust cross tabulation. The survey questionnaire schedules, a combination of qualitative, quantitative and open ended questions are shown at Appendix A.

12 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

1.9 Analysis

1.9.1 The sample of people taking part in this research is not based on stratified random selection but quotas of the target groups spread around the geographical locations shown in the literature review. In the case of the face to face interviews numbers were monitored on a rolling basis to ensure that there were sufficient numbers in all the demographic groups targeted. In addition the catchment areas for selection vary with focus groups and face to face surveys confined to England and Wales compared to the electronic survey which covers the United Kingdom. Thus confidence measures cannot be estimated nor detailed magnitudes. This means, for example, that we are unable to provide information about the proportions of the workforce who are either commuters or business travellers (the latter defined as people who travel during the course of work). Rather, based on a discussions and surveys with 732 working people comprising a spread of never/rare (i.e. commuters), occasional and frequent in-work travellers, we can report on the attitudes of each group to key work related travel issues. This also enables cross tabulation for comparison between one group and another. 1.9.2 For some questions such as type of location (rural, suburban, urban) ‘amount of travel’, or disability we have relied on self-definition. The value of this approach is also illustrated by exploring the meaning behind these concepts. For example, one of the questions asked of all participants was “have you travelled more or less in the past two years?”. The phrase ‘travel more’ was interpreted by some as making more major trips by mechanical means whilst for others it included walking or cycling more. Another difference was whether or not the judgement included international travel. In turn, for both groups it might or might not include an element of time and or distance. Unravelling these different meanings of ‘travelling more’ gives a crucial insight into the nature of recent travel changes and their implications for the future which will not necessarily square with ‘objective’ evidence such as from the National Travel Survey showing static or declining per capita travel. 1.9.3 The focus of the analysis is on attitudinal factors and for that reason verbatim comments which often illustrate key points better than secondary reporting, have been incorporated into the reporting.

13 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

2. Literature Review

2.1 Objectives

2.1.1 As described in section 1.1 above, the Independent Transport Commission’s 2013 report series ‘On the Move’5 found significant changes in travel amongst some groups. 2.1.2 The reasons for the decline in driving by young people especially by males – was the subject of the first stage of the ITC Phase 2 research in 2013/2014. For this second stage of Phase 2 a literature review was commissioned. The main objective of this desktop study was as far as possible to describe shifting travel patterns of other target demographic groups, and the secondary objective was to highlight geographical areas where there are concentrations of high car use amongst these groups in order to target the qualitative and quantitative research phases. 2.1.3 This data review has been conducted in a short time, as a preliminary to Social Research Associates’ in-depth work, and is not intended as a comprehensive evaluation of all research and data available, more as an effort to find key points to help in the design of survey work.6

5 Scott Le Vine and Peter Jones “On the Move: Making sense of car and train travel trends in Britain” published by RAC Foundation, Office of Rail Regulation, Independent Transport Commission, Transport Scotland and the RAC Foundation (December 2012) 6 In designing this research we are grateful for the insights gained from many who have written about the concept of ‘peak car’ and for their generous insights and support for this project. In particular, David Metz “Peak Car: the Future of Travel” (2014, Landor links), fellow Commissioners of the ITC especially Prof Peter Jones and Peter Headicar, colleagues from the Academy of Urbanism, Future Agenda, the Transport Statistics Users Group and numerous others including Prof Glen Lyons, Karen Lucas “Automotives: Understanding Car Use Behaviour” (2011, Emerald), John Sutton “Gridlock” (2015, Routledge) and transport journalists including Richard Westcott (BBC), Mark Hillsdon (Guardian) and the Office of National Statistics. 14 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

2.1.4 There appears to be very little substantial research on changing travel patterns in the UK, particularly those associated with black and minority ethnic and migrant groups. The main sources for this desk-top research are therefore, the National Travel Survey (NTS) and the UK Census data (2001 and 2011). The NTS is the primary source of data on personal travel patterns in Great Britain. It is an established household survey which has been running continuously since 1988. It is designed to monitor long-term trends in personal travel and to inform the development of policy. The survey collects information on how, why, when and where people travel as well as factors affecting travel (e.g. car availability and driving licence holding). Since 2002, the Department for Transport (DfT) has commissioned the National Centre for Social Research to conduct the survey fieldwork. Data collection consists of a face-to-face interview and a 1 week self-completed written travel diary. In 2013, the survey coverage changed from sampling residents of all Great Britain to residents of England only. 2.1.5 The review concentrated on demographic groups who have been identified through previous research as being under-represented in national car and rail forecasting models. These groups are: 1. Older people 2. Migrants 3. Black, Asian and Minority ethnic groups 4. Business travellers 2.1.6 A full version of the literature review is shown at Appendix B and a summary of the data results are listed below in sections 2.2 through to 2.5 . 2.2 Older people

An increasing proportion are economically active (65-74 year olds have nearly doubled from 8.7% in 2011 to 16% in 2011) 2.2.1 There are more older drivers with those aged 70+ increasing from 65% (M) and 22% (F) in 1998 to 79% (M) and 42% (F) in 2012. Table 2 Full car driving licence holders (% in Great Britain)

1998-2000 (%) 2010 (%) 2012 (%) 50-59 60-69 70+ 50-59 60-69 70+ 50-59 60-69 70+ All adults 77 67 39 83 79 57 82 79 58 Males 88 83 65 90 89 78 89 89 79 Females 67 53 22 77 69 41 75 70 42

15 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

2.2.2 Take up rates of concessionary fares for older people has also increased (from 30% in 1998-200 to 66% in 2012) and rates of bus use have risen correspondingly. In 1998/2000 32% of over 60 year olds said they used a bus at least once a week and this had increased to 40% in 2010. 2.2.3 Car ownership is lowest amongst over 65s but the rates have been increasing for 60- 74 year olds but interestingly declined for 85+ year olds. Table 3 Percentage comparison of car ownership between 2001 and 2011

60-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 0 cars/van 18 14 23 19 48 35 45 70 1 car/van 50 42 52 52 42 51 46 24 2 cars/vans 32 44 25 29 10 14 9 6 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

2.2.4 Household car ownership rates for older people also vary by sex. In the 50-54 age group, men and women are almost equally likely to have a car in the household but by the age of 80 to 84, car availability amongst women is 25% lower than amongst men, except in London where all rates of car ownership are low. In the oldest age group, the difference is slightly less stark, partly because car ownership amongst men aged over 85 is also quite low. 2.3 Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups

2.3.1 Between 2001 and 2011, the proportion of the population in the UK identifying as White British and White Irish decreased to 87% (55 million). The remaining 13% (8.1 million) belonged to a minority ethnic group. It is also the case that estimates show that the proportion of BAME groups will double by 2051 to 25% due to the higher birth rate amongst people of Pakistani, Bangladeshi and African origin.7 2.3.2 The location of BAME groups varies, with concentration in urban areas. After London (40% belonging to a minority group in 2011), the West Midlands was the most diverse area and Wales was the least. 2.3.3 However, these broad profiles mask significant differences between BAME groups. For example, Asian Indian households have higher rates of household car ownership compared to both the white UK population and other ethnic groups whilst Afro- Caribbeans have far lower rates than all groups.

7 School of Geography, University of Leeds (2015) http://www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/research/centre-for-spatial-analysis-and-policy/projects/ethnic/ 16 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

2.4 Migrant groups

2.4.1 ‘On the Move’ (2012) highlighted that people born overseas tend to drive less than people born in the UK. 2.4.2 Chart 1 shows a comparison of the most reported countries of birth of non-UK born usual residents from the 2001 and 2011 census. This shows a marked decline in residents from the Republic of Ireland and a large increase of those from Poland, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria.

Chart 1 Chart 1 Most reported countries of birth of non-UK born usual residents8

800,000

700,000

600,000

500,000 400,000 Number 300,000

200,000 100,000

0

India Poland Nigeria Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa United States

Republic of Ireland 2001 Census 2011 Census

2.4.3 The data on migration showed the local areas with the highest proportions of people not born within the UK and this was used to tailor the research samples to highlight differences in travel patterns between long established migrants and more recent arrivals.

Chart 2 2.4.4 Although many recent migrants are students, the recruitment quotas were weighted towards employed migrants since they are more likely to stay longer and thus affect travel demand in the longer term. Insurance too expensive 33%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

No need – public transport good 5%

Internet shopping 3%

People prefer to walk/cycle 3%

17 Displaced8 by social http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/resources/figure2_tcm77-290348.png media use 2%

Environmental reasons 2%

Not into cars – no interest 2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Chart 3

32% Insurance too expensive 54% 31% Too expensive to run a car 17% 23% Too expensive to learn to drive 8% 9% No need – public transport 5% 4% People prefer to walk/cycle 9% 1% Not into cars – no interest 0% 0% Internet shopping 4% 0% Social media use 3% 0% Environmental reasons 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Male Female

28%

Chart 4 Insurance too expensive 32%

43%

34%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

29%

19%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Over 30 20 - 30 Under 20

40% 38%

35% 33% 34% 31%

Chart 5 30%

25% 20% 20% 20%

15%

10% 8% 7% 4% 4% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Male Female

Chart 6

70%

59% 60%

50% 48%

40% 30% 30% 24%

20%

9% 10% 7% 7% 8% 4% 4%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle Yes I own a car No I don't own a car

Chart 7

80% 73% 70% 59% 60%

50%

40%

30% 20% 19% 21% 20%

10% 8%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car

Yes I own a car No I don't own a car INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

2.5 Business travellers

2.5.1 The analysis of business and commuting travel was based on data up until 2012 which would be said to predate the economic recovery. 2.5.2 In 2012, the average number of business trips (per person (defined as the course of work) in Great Britain was 31, travelling 606 miles. Both the number of business trips made and the distance travelled on business trips were lower in 2012 than the comparative figures for 2002 when the average number of trips per person was 34 and the miles travelled per year was 683. The drops in these figures occurred after 2007; around the time that the financial crisis occurred (NTS 2013). 2.5.3 On average, in 2012 a person made 146 commuting trips (defined as a trip from home to work), travelling 1,318 miles. In 2013, for England only, these figures were 145 and 1,279. These figures are 18% and 11% lower respectively, than the same figures for 1995/97. The decrease in commuting trips has been a large contributor in the 16% fall in all trips recorded between 1995/97 and 2013. Part of this decrease is likely to be related to the increase in the proportion of people who work at home and changes in employment status. 2.5.4 Commuting by public transport increased between 2001 and 2011, although commuting by bus or coach saw a slight decrease as shown in table 4. Table 4 Public transport commuters, 2001 to 2011 (England and Wales)

Percentages 2001 2011 Percentage Point Change Public Transport 14.5 15.9 1.4 Light Rail 3.0 3.8 0.8 Train 4.1 5.0 0.9 Bus or Coach 7.4 7.2 -0.2

Source: 2001 and 2011 Census - Office for National Statistics 2.6 Conclusion

2.6.1 The literature review and data analysis at Appendix B contain a wealth of analysis by age, ethnicity, migration and work travel. Much more could have been included but the research provided a good guide to geographical areas in which to capture good proportions of the target groups.

18 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

3. RESULTS: Young People

3.1 Introduction and methodology

3.1.1 The group interviews with young people were carried out in two tranches which enabled the results from the first to be built into the second.

First tranche 3.1.2 Fifteen family or group interviews were carried out in January-February 2013 weighted towards 16-30 year olds and in total involving 100 people. Each interview session included setting out a key finding from the quantitative research and then asking participants to rate the influence of different reasons for the change on a scale of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (do not agree). The results of this study were presented to a joint ITC/RAC workshop held in February 2013. There was considerable interest in exploring the findings further which was subsequently commissioned to focus on attitudes of young drivers.

Second tranche 3.1.3 This stage of the research was planned to explore these issues in greater depth by interviewing and surveying people in focus groups. A critical objective was to investigate whether the changes in recent travel patterns of young people will continue throughout future life stages. The focus was on those groups where travel changes appear to be most dramatic as identified in the original ‘On the Move’ (2012) report, particularly younger people, men, and urban residents. 3.1.4 12 focus groups were arranged in four areas, (namely London, Manchester, Leicester, Exeter/Bristol) and their rural and suburban hinterlands. Within each group there were a mixture of drivers and non-drivers. The original plan was to also recruit a mix of low and high mileage groups but there were so few 20 year olds in the latter groups that this criteria was changed to whether people were drivers or non-drivers. Eight of the groups were divided by age (under 30, and 30-42) and four of the groups were of mixed ages (17-42). In total 97 people took part.

19 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

3.1.5 In addition an electronic survey was carried out involving 1,700 respondents and the total research resulted in demographic profiles of 2,351 young people as shown in Table 5. Table 5 Profile of all participants

Driving Driving Household Age Age Totals licence licence car 17-29 30-40 (full) provisional ownership South West 69% 21% 86% 74% 26% 132 North 59% 23% 68% 71% 29% 804 East 60% 22% 79% 73% 27% 117 Midlands 59% 20% 70% 69% 31% 436 London & SE 64% 21% 72% 66% 34% 744

3.1.6 This methodology was designed to explore attitudinal and behavioural differences especially by age, socio-economic status, gender, density of residence, licence holding and car ownership. In addition data was collected on access to a car, plans for car purchase and mode of travel for short and long trips. The figure below shows the basis of recruitment and analysis.

Group C 17-29 year olds who had medium or high Group D 30-39 Group B 30-39 licence levels and year olds who year olds who had low car ownership had high licence low licence holding levels and low car and low mileage ownership when when 17-29 20-29

Analysis Have groups B & D reverted Mixed age Group A 17-29 to average travel groups 17-39 year olds who had patterns? low licence holding and low mileage

20 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

3.2 Why has driving especially by young men declined?

3.2.1 Summary of the factors identified

All young people • An increasing number of young people are going to university and accumulating debts. • Real wages and employment rates for young people have declined especially during the recession. • Concessionary travel, Advance rail fares, car sharing, car clubs are cheaper for Chart 1 travel than running a car.

• Parking at university800,000 campuses and at work places in urban areas is limited.

• The quality of700,000 public transport is improving. 600,000 Young men 500,000 • Young men form400,000 partnerships and become fathers at later ages compared Number to women. 300,000 • Cars are becoming200,000 less attractive than alternative consumer goods. 100,000 • Young men like to cycle and are concerned about health. 0

• Young men are less concernedIndia about personal safety than women. Poland Nigeria Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa United States 3.3 Car insurance costs areRepublic perceived of Ireland to be higher for men than women 2001 Census 2011 Census

Cost factors 3.3.1 There is no doubt that the cost of running a car is a major factor in deterring young people from car ownership. Chart 2 shows the results of individual ranking of reasons why driving by under 30 year olds had declined. Chart 2 Chart 2 First ranking preference (ALL n = 2,231)

Insurance too expensive 33%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

No need – public transport good 5%

Internet shopping 3%

People prefer to walk/cycle 3%

Displaced by social media use 2%

Environmental reasons 2%

Not into cars – no interest 2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

21

Chart 3

32% Insurance too expensive 54% 31% Too expensive to run a car 17% 23% Too expensive to learn to drive 8% 9% No need – public transport 5% 4% People prefer to walk/cycle 9% 1% Not into cars – no interest 0% 0% Internet shopping 4% 0% Social media use 3% 0% Environmental reasons 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Male Female

28%

Chart 4 Insurance too expensive 32%

43%

34%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

29%

19%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Over 30 20 - 30 Under 20

40% 38%

35% 33% 34% 31%

Chart 5 30%

25% 20% 20% 20%

15%

10% 8% 7% 4% 4% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Male Female

Chart 6

70%

59% 60%

50% 48%

40% 30% 30% 24%

20%

9% 10% 7% 7% 8% 4% 4%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle Yes I own a car No I don't own a car

Chart 7

80% 73% 70% 59% 60%

50%

40%

30% 20% 19% 21% 20%

10% 8%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car

Yes I own a car No I don't own a car INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

3.3.2 The rankings show that cost factors are chosen as the main reasons for a decline of driving by young men with the costs of running a car (both insurance and general running expenses) mentioned by two thirds. Insurance was felt to be especially expensive for young men compared to young women. These findings are not surprising and many details were given. This age group is more likely to earn below average or to be unemployed. In addition an ever greater proportion are attending fee paying full-time post-18 education courses and living away from home with associated accommodation costs. 3.3.3 Current figures show that UK higher education institutions together educate some 2.5 million students annually and that the last 10 years has seen significant expansion, with a 28% increase in student enrolment. “I was quoted £5,394 for comprehensive car insurance by Go Compare. In my dreams.” (20 year old post office worker, male, Manchester) “How can young people possibly afford to run a car? – if you manage to get an older car it’s no advantage because you pay more road tax and burn more petrol.” (28 year old customer service centre, male, London) 3.3.4 The cost of learning to drive was given as the most important deterrent by 18% and this is reflected in the decline of driving tests (down by 200,000 in the last four years). But underlying this result was a wealth of complex factors in particular the difficulty of passing the theory test and there being no point due to not being able to afford a car. Other factors were changing priorities for alternative spending. “My parents offered to pay for driving lessons but I preferred to use the money to buy a guitar.” (23 year old student, male, Bristol) “The grandparents gave me £500 when I was 21 and suggested I use it for driving lessons but I spent it on travelling instead. Plenty of time to worry about driving when I’m older.” (27 year old solicitor, female, Exeter) “I did have a few lessons and I know I’d sail through the driving test but not so sure about the theory test – reading isn’t my thing really and you can’t get driving lessons for that.” (21 year old Apprentice dock worker, male, Thurrock)

Gender and cost: 3.3.5 Chart 3 shows that although both sexes rate cost factors as key reasons for not driving there are significant differences. For women, both insurance and running costs are equal deterrents followed closely by the expense of learning to drive. In contrast for men, insurance costs were the most prominent explanation cited by over a half compared to only a third of women. The reasons were relatively lower income at an early age for women plus the expectation by women that they would need more driving lessons than men. The overall impact of these gender differences is that cost factors were more significant for women’s first three priorities than men’s (86% compared to 78%).

22 Chart 1

800,000

700,000

600,000

500,000 400,000 Number 300,000

200,000

100,000

0

India Poland Nigeria Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa United States

Republic of Ireland 2001 Census 2011 Census

Chart 2

Insurance too expensive 33%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

No need – public transport good 5%

Internet shopping 3%

People prefer to walk/cycle 3%

Displaced by social media use 2%

Environmental reasons 2%

Not into cars – no interest 2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Chart 3

Chart 3 First preference for reasons for not driving

32% Insurance too expensive 54% 31% Too expensive to run a car 17% 23% Too expensive to learn to drive 8% 9% No need – public transport 5% 4% People prefer to walk/cycle 9% 1% Not into cars – no interest 0% 0% Internet shopping 4% 0% Social media use 3% 0% Environmental reasons 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Male Female

“I’m doing all right now but ten years ago I had to count every penny and learning to drive was low on my agenda.” (34 year old solicitor, Leicester, female) “My brothers all passed their test without any lessons except from my Dad but it didn’t work for me and I didn’t have the money for private lessons.28% I think a lot of Chart 4 women find the sameInsurance – boys too expensive are more confident with cars.” 32% (25 year old student, London, female) 43%

Cost and age 34% 3.3.6 Although all age groups rated cost factors as the top three deterrents to driving, Too expensive to run a car 32% the cost of insurance was chosen by far more under 29 year olds compared to over 29% 30 year olds (Chart 4) and it was clear that this was a major issue for young men. There were many ‘horror’ stories of very high premiums and very few participants

were aware of options reducing standard quotations by agreeing19% to restricted hours

of driving or Toonumbers expensive of to passengers. learn to drive 18% 3.3.7 One strategy used by some young drivers to avoid high16% premiums was to insure their car in the name of their parents (known as ‘fronting’) but both they and their parents were uneasy about the legality of this0% practice 5% 10% and 15% also 20%aware 25% that 30% they 35% were 40% not 45% accumulating a no claims bonus. Over 30 20 - 30 Under 20 “When I was at home I got my Mum to say she was the owner and main driver but she was always worried about lying 40%and possible consequences. When I left home 38%

to go college it seemed simpler to jack35% it in.” (31 year old publishing editor, London,33% 34% male) 31% Chart 5 30% “I was quoted nearly £3,000 for insuring an old Toyota which I bought for £300.” (20 25% year old trainee baker, Bristol, male) 20% 20% 20% “I have to admit I spend a few years driving without insurance but when I got the job with the Ministry I decided it wasn’t 15%worth the risk of getting caught.” (30 year old civil servant, Newcastle, male) 10% 8% 7% 4% 4% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Male Female

23

Chart 6

70%

59% 60%

50% 48%

40% 30% 30% 24%

20%

9% 10% 7% 7% 8% 4% 4%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle Yes I own a car No I don't own a car

Chart 7

80% 73% 70% 59% 60%

50%

40%

30% 20% 19% 21% 20%

10% 8%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car

Yes I own a car No I don't own a car Chart 1

800,000

700,000

600,000

500,000 400,000 Number 300,000

200,000

100,000

0

India Poland Nigeria Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa United States

Republic of Ireland 2001 Census 2011 Census

Chart 2

Insurance too expensive 33%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

No need – public transport good 5%

Internet shopping 3%

People prefer to walk/cycle 3%

Displaced by social media use 2%

Environmental reasons 2%

Not into cars – no interest 2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Chart 3

32% Insurance too expensive 54% 31% Too expensive to run a car 17% 23% Too expensive to learn to drive 8% 9% No need – public transport 5% INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION 4% People prefer to walk/cycle 9% 1% Not into cars – no interest 0% 0% Internet shopping 4% 0% Social media use 3% “My twin sister0% was quoted £1,300 and mine was £2,250 so she’s the main driver Environmental reasons 0% and I’m on as the named driver even though we’re living in different places and 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I run the car. I’m not sure it’s legal but they can’t prove it.” (21 year old student, Male Female Altrincham, male). Chart 4 Top three priorities by age group

28%

Chart 4 Insurance too expensive 32%

43%

34%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

29%

19%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Over 30 20 - 30 Under 20

3.3.8 An explanation for less weight to the deterrent effect of the cost of insurance by 30+ year olds was that 40%this age group were less aware of recent increases in 38%

premiums for young drivers.35% In contrast, there was a tendency for 33%30+ year olds34% to overestimate the cost and difficulty of learning to drive. 31% Chart 5 30% “The driving test is much harder these days – you have to take two parts and do 25% reversing so people need more 20%lessons 20% and nothing’s getting cheaper.” (34 year old plumber, Manchester, male).20% “Insurance is getting cheaper15% – these comparison sites keep costs down and there’s

all sorts of deals such as10% not driving with people8% in the back for young people to get 7% lower premiums.” (38 year old company secretary, 4%Exeter, female). 4% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Male Female

Chart 6

70%

59% 60% 24

50% 48%

40% 30% 30% 24%

20%

9% 10% 7% 7% 8% 4% 4%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle Yes I own a car No I don't own a car

Chart 7

80% 73% 70% 59% 60%

50%

40%

30% 20% 19% 21% 20%

10% 8%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car

Yes I own a car No I don't own a car On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

3.4 Demographic and lifestyle influences

3.4.1 One of the key issues raised to explain patterns of travel was the later age of settling down with a partner and subsequently having children. This is also another reason for differences between men and women since in spite of later marriage (currently 36.2 and 33.6 respectively) for both sexes, the average age differential has remained constant at three years. “I didn’t buy a car until I moved in with my partner. Before that it was cheaper to go by train or I used BlaBlaCar a lot.” (Fireman, 32 years old, Manchester) “I love cycling and never thought about getting a car but she loves driving so we tend to use the car for longer trips although cycling would always be my choice.” (teacher, 34 years old, London) 3.4.2 There were also other lifestyle differences. For example more young people (and people generally) are moving to urban areas where public transport is a good alternative. Some of the young people taking part in the research had grown up in rural areas but moved to cities initially for education but then stayed and had no desire to return to a rural way of life. “There’s a song my granny used to sing ‘How they gonna keep ‘em down on the farm after they’ve seen Paris’ and it sums up what I feel about the thought of going back to Fowey.” (teacher, aged 31, Bristol, male) 3.4.3 Gender issues were also influential. Compared to their male age counterparts, women were more likely to use cars to enable multitask trips which fits with national figures about women having less leisure time. 3.4.4 Women were also more concerned about personal security and saw cars with their door to door offer as safer. “The first thing I did when I was 17 was to get driving lessons and six months later my Dad bought me a car. Before that he had to keep meeting me from the station especially late at night. I love my car and I feel happy to go all over London at any time of the day or night – for me it’s liberation.” (Bus driver, aged 28, London, female) 3.4.5 Finally there was an element of ‘catching up with men’. Although younger women have nearly caught up with men in terms of driving licence acquisition, there are still differences in car ownership and income. Thus there is still a certain kudos for women in acquiring their own car as shown by some of the comments made by women with a high degree of car use. “The days of cars needing a lot of maintenance and so on are gone and women are driving buses and even lorries. I see having my own car as an important step forward for myself as an independent woman not dependent on men. It’s a long way to go though – with couples it’s almost always the man driving.” (engineer trainer, aged 35, London, female)

25 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

3.5 Attitudes to public transport

3.5.1 As well as the ‘push’ factor of increased costs of driving the research shows a ‘pull’ influence of positive attitudes to public transport. For example 5% gave the quality of public transport as the main explanation for less driving and this view was illustrated by a wide range of supporting evidence ranging from the availability of cheap advanced rail and coach fares and improved quality and frequency of all bus, coach and rail services. 3.5.2 For many young people, public transport is a genuine preference compared to driving for both short and longer journeys. There are a variety of reasons for this ranging from competitive or cheaper cost, convenience and the ability to use electronic technology on trains and buses. In addition there was general agreement by users of all modes including cars that public transport was better and getting better all the time. “Public transport is a genuine alternative for me – I always look at those options first especially for intercity travel – I can get a lot of work done on a trip to Leeds which I do twice a month – I wouldn’t dream of driving.” (lawyer, 31 years old, London, female) “The new metro is great – who in their right mind would drive to Manchester now?” (student, 23 years old, Altrincham, male) “My parents don’t have a clue about how to get good fares – they just think train and taxis are for special trips. My mum was amazed when I used the ‘Next Bus’ app to time when we left home but I can’t see her changing.” (student, 22 years old, London, male) “People moan about public transport but I did a geography project looking at bus services from our village in the 1970’s and it was no better then – in fact it’s better now because they’ve opened a new station (Crosskeys, Wales).” (childcare assistant, 35 years old, Deptford, female) “Public transport information is generally excellent and in real time too. I sent a note to First when I missed my connection and they came right back with an alternative. I use google mapping a lot too.” (technician, 27 years old, Leicester, male). “Coaches are undervalued – there’s a really good network used by students – they have wifi these days and they’re more direct than rail or even driving for some routes.”

26 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

3.6 Rail use

3.6.1 The NTS showed that compared to bus use, rail use was increasing and there was a lot of supporting evidence to explain this finding from the research. Key factors were the ability to use electronic technology on trains, productive time to work, fast journey times, sociability and cost advantages especially due to rail card reductions. Another factor was the decline in company cars and new forms of taxation for using company cars and especially vans for private use. “In the past no one minded if I used the company car at weekends but now we have to keep count of mileage and declare it for tax so I don’t bother – I tend to travel by train now.” (chain store clothes buyer, 28 years old, Bristol, female) “I drive a van in the week and I’m not allowed to use it for my own purposes but anyway that’s enough driving for me so I cycle evenings and weekends and I’ve no desire to own my own car.” (flower shop delivery driver, 27 years old, Manchester, male) “I’d never want to drive back to Uni – I get a lot of work done on the train or watch videos – why would I want to waste dead time driving.” (post graduate student, 30 years old, Manchester, female) “My rail card is one of my best things. I’ve left getting a new one till the last day of being 25. I don’t just use it for journeys home but I go for the Advance fares to make day trips and visit friends. I love trains.” (trainee barrister, 25 years old, London, female) “My Mum has dementia and I try to get back to Newcastle most weekends. If I drove it would take hours compared to the train and more important it’s predictable compared to struggling with traffic across the Pennines on a Friday evening.” “I always enjoy going by train. It’s more relaxing and the family rail card is a real bargain. They even have kiddy packs and the staff are marvellous with the children. We used to drive a lot when they were small and it was a nightmare – we had to keep stopping and I always arrived in a state of nerves.” (mother, unwaged, aged 27, Leicester) “We built my stag party around the train system – Plymouth to Newcastle – we had a great time together in reserved seats – totally plastered when we arrived. Much better than going in individual cars – the journey was part of the event.” (Farmer, aged 34, Exeter, male). 3.6.2 One of the factors in explaining such positive views of rail was the experience of travelling First Class enabled by booking off-peak Advanced Fares. “I’m very flexible about when I travel so I usually get a First Class ticket. Last week I went to Newcastle for the football and the ticket was £38 plus I had three glasses of wine, sandwiches and goodness knows what other snacks. I reckon I made a profit. Brilliant.” (student, aged 23, London, male)

27 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

“We often go up to Manchester on Virgin for the night clubs at weekends – the cost varies but it’s worth it for that little bit of luxury.” (shop assistant, age 22, London, female) 3.7 Cycling and walking

3.7.1 Most participants agreed that exercise was important and that combining walking or cycling with travel was sensible and often enjoyable. However, the health aspect was not an important motivator in its own right: other advantages such as journey time and the enjoyment of walking or cycling were discussed. Men in particular were keen on cycling and some participants in the groups were extremely committed and enthusiastic. “I hate buses – being controlled and so slow but I love cycling. You get the freedom of the road in a way you can’t any other way including for cars.” (shop worker, 35 year old, Exeter, male) “I had to stop cycling for a few months when I broke my leg skiing and at the end I’d put on two stone.” (electrician, 19 years old, London, male) 3.7.2 In comparison many women expressed concern about safety when discussing cycling as a travel option. I’d never cycle – I’d be terrified – even on cycle paths if you wobble you’d be under a lorry and anyway buses cut into them – they have to get to the bus stops after all.” (restaurant manager, 24 years old, Bristol, female) “I reckon there’s ten men to every one women who cycle in London. I did try it once or twice but it was really scary. It’s a man thing.” (receptionist, 29 years old, London, female) 3.7.3 There is also evidence of an increased interest in cycling as a substitute especially in London and the bigger cities. Some young men in the discussion groups were very knowledgeable about cycling, different models of cycling, subscribed to cycling magazines and followed cycling sports. A key factor in the attraction of cycling was independence as compared to using public transport. “I’d always prefer to cycle or even walk sometimes rather than go on a bus which seems so slow and the other passengers’ behaviour drives me mad.” (gardener, aged 26, Greenwich, male). 3.7.4 Walking was very popular with both men and women and indeed the most common method of transport for short trips and often cited as a better alternative to driving. “I read that the majority of car trips are under two miles – that must be the easiest thing to publicise to encourage walking. I would never think of getting the car out just to go to the local shops. The kids prefer it too.” (mother, aged 40, unwaged, Manchester)

28 Chart 1

800,000

700,000

600,000

500,000 400,000 Number 300,000

200,000

100,000

0

India Poland Nigeria Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa United States

Republic of Ireland 2001 Census 2011 Census

Chart 2

Insurance too expensive 33%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

No need – public transport good 5%

Internet shopping 3%

People prefer to walk/cycle 3%

Displaced by social media use 2%

Environmental reasons 2%

Not into cars – no interest 2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Chart 3

32% Insurance too expensive 54% 31% Too expensive to run a car 17% 23% Too expensive to learn to drive 8% 9% No need – public transport 5% 4% People prefer to walk/cycle 9% 1% Not into cars – no interest 0% 0% Internet shopping 4% 0% Social media use 3% 0% Environmental reasons 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Male Female

28%

Chart 4 Insurance too expensive 32%

43%

34%

Too expensive to run a car 32%

29%

19%

On the TooMove: expensive Exploring to learn attitudesto drive to road and rail travel18% in Britain

16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Over 30 20 - 30 Under 20 Chart 5 Main mode of transport for short local trips by sex

40% 38%

35% 33% 34% 31%

Chart 5 30%

25% 20% 20% 20%

15%

10% 8% 7% 4% 4% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Male Female

3.7.5 Walking was not necessarily only a method of getting from A to B either. For some it was a social activity enabling conversation and eye contact with strangers. “Stuck in a car you’re isolated from humanity a bit like those saddos who cruise around the bar areas in their customised cars. It’s a lot better to be in the crowd and in direct contact. Having said that I guess I’m as fussy about my appearance as some are with their cars.” (actuary, 34 years old, Leicester, female) “Going from club to club is part of the evening out. You can’t beat cruising around Chart 6 Harbourside and you certainly couldn’t drive there.” (26 year old student, Bristol, male) 70% “I like strutting around the town – let’s face it – in a car it’s the car people look at 59% not you – when60% you’re walking people notice what you’re wearing and how you look. Although I say it myself I put on quite a good show – I take a great interest 50% 48% in fashion.” (19 year old builder, Manchester, male) 40% 30% 3.8 Lack of 30%parking 24%

3.8.1 Another factor20% raised in the discussions was the difficulty in finding parking spaces. This was rather more about availability than cost. Indeed some universities have a 9% 10% 7% 7% 8% no parking policy and this has been exacerbated4% as more out of town campuses have4%

been sold off0% in favour of city centre consolidation and new building development. Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle “I have to admit I nearly chose LoughboroughYes I own a because car No they I don't have own a goodcar student parking provision but in the end I went for the best course and had to sell my car. It wasn’t just lack of parking at the University but outside my digs too.” (student, 26 years old, Leicester, female)

Chart 7

80% 73% 70% 59% 60%

50% 29 40%

30% 20% 19% 21% 20%

10% 8%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car

Yes I own a car No I don't own a car INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

3.9 Leisure activities especially drinking

3.9.1 A key factor in reducing car use especially amongst under 30 year olds is a growing awareness of the dangers of drink driving. The use of a designated driver was mentioned but the usual approach was to walk or use taxis. “Both the parents used to chance it to drive after they’d had a few but I wouldn’t do that. It could seriously wreck my career choices and anyway imagine how you’d feel if you killed someone.” (student, aged 23, Manchester, male) “We had a talk about road safety during freshers week and they showed some really scary pictures of car crashes due to drink driving. It made an impression on me and I don’t know any of my friends who would do and so given that a lot of students go clubbing it’s one reason for the decline in driving.” (student, 21 years old, Bristol, male) 3.9.2 The key question is how long will such attitudes last as these young men form relationships and start families. What may be relevant is that many of these young men without cars are developing very good knowledge about public transport and organising their activities around routes. “We used to go to a big bar off the ring road but now all the best places are in the city.” (delivery driver, aged 28, Leicester, male)

3.10 Technology and social media

3.10.1 One of the suggestions to explain the decline in car use by 20 year olds was that social media and internet shopping were substitutes for travel and that a car for some was no longer a ‘must have’ to keep in touch with friends. 3.10.2 The research showed that this was not considered to be an explanation and that it was quite the reverse. Contacts via Facebook, Twitter and other social media plus instant access to other information such as leisure activities encouraged travel to visit a wider circle of friends and activities. However this was not necessarily by car and indeed given that social activities were usually in city centres, public transport was a first choice especially if drinking alcohol was involved. “I belong to loads of internet groups including one for making contact with other gays – chatting on line is OK but generally the motive is to meet which I do frequently including travelling to other towns or gigs at the weekend.” (insurance broker, aged 29, London, male).

30 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

“The effect of the internet is to increase travel – OK I spend a lot of time on computers but that’s how life is these days – maybe in the past people did less or watched TV more. Also I have access to all that technology while I’m travelling anyway – no need to sit in the office or at home anymore.” (student, aged 34, Bristol, female) 3.11 Health

3.11.1 Another suggestion for the decline in driving by young people in their 20s was the desire for exercise. This did not appear to be a key motivator since sport was generally seen as specific activity following time set aside for going to the gym, playing football and so on. There were also differences between men and women in the amount of time spent on sport with men more likely to engage in competitive sport. 3.12 Environmental and safety concerns

3.12.1 Like health, this was not a key motivator. That is not to imply that there was no concern about environmental issues but it was not enough to represent a primary influence on the travel choice of most people. Rather it was cited as an additional reason to explain modal choice. “I do worry about air pollution – my sister has asthma but it’s difficult to get to my job otherwise. Anyway I share the trip to work with two other people so the total impact on the environment is less than going on buses which are responsible for a lot of pollution in cities.” (assistant in parcel office, aged 24, Crayford, female) “I love cycling for the freedom it gives me – I can’t stand the time it takes to go by bus. Also it’s the least polluting form of transport.” (salesman, aged 38, Leicester, male) 3.12.2 Another factor which particularly affected those who had not obtained a licence in their early 20s was concern about their own driving ability and fear of causing an accident. “When I was 17 I got a provisional licence but never used it and now I’m worried about driving what is in effect a lethal weapon – I don’t think I’d be a very good driver – I’m a bit of a dreamer and anyway I’ve seen some terrible near misses by drivers while I’ve been cycling.” (bank manager, aged 33, Manchester, male). 3.13 Will the decline in driving by young men continue?

Car owners make multimodal choices 3.13.1 One of the aims of the research was to explore the transition from young people in their twenties to those in their thirties. 3.13.2 Over the sample as a whole, car owners made more trips by car but over a quarter of trips for longer journeys by car owners were by other modes.

31 Chart 1

800,000

700,000

600,000 Chart 1 500,000 400,000

Number 800,000 300,000 700,000 200,000 600,000 100,000 500,000 0 400,000

Number India Poland Nigeria 300,000 Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa 200,000 United States Republic of Ireland 100,000 2001 Census 2011 Census 0

India Poland Nigeria Pakistan Germany Jamaica Bangladesh South Africa United States

Republic of Ireland 2001 Census 2011 Census

Chart 2

Insurance too expensive 33%

Too expensive to run a car 32% Chart 2 Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

No need – public transport good 5% Insurance too expensive 33% Internet shopping 3% Too expensive to run a car 32% People prefer to walk/cycle 3% Too expensive to learn to drive 18% Displaced by social media use 2% No need – public transport good 5% Environmental reasons 2% Internet shopping 3% Not into cars – no interest 2% People prefer to walk/cycle 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Displaced by social media use 2%

Environmental reasons 2%

Not into cars – no interest 2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Chart 3

32% Insurance too expensive 54% 31% Chart 3 Too expensive to run a car 17% 23% Too expensive to learn to drive 8% 9% No need – public transport 5% 4% 32% PeopleInsurance prefer totoo walk/cycle expensive 9% 54% 1% 31% NotToo intoexpensive cars – tono run interest a car 0% 17% 0% 23% Too expensiveInternet to learn shopping to drive 4% 8% 0% 9% No need Social– public media transport use 3%5% 0% 4% PeopleEnvironmental prefer to walk/cycle reasons 0% 9% 0% 1% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Not into cars – no interest 0% 0% Male Female Internet shopping 4% 0% Social media use 3% 0% Environmental reasons 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Male Female 28%

Chart 4 Insurance too expensive 32%

43%

28% 34%

Chart 4 TooInsurance expensive too to expensive run a car 32%32%

29% 43%

19% 34%

Too expensiveToo expensive to learn to run to drivea car 18% 32%

16% 29%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Over 30 19%20 - 30 Under 20 Too expensive to learn to drive 18%

16% 40% 38% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 35% 33% 34% 31% Over 30 20 - 30 Under 20 Chart 5 30%

25% 40% 20% 20% 38% 20% 35% 33% 34% 15% 31% Chart 5 30% 10% 8% 7% 25% 4% 4% 5% 20% 20% 20% 0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle 15% Male Female 10% 8% 7% 4% 4% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Male Female

Chart 6 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

70%

59% 60% Chart 6 50% 48% Chart 6 Short local trips by car ownership

40%70% 30% 30% 59% 60% 24%

20%50% 48%

9% 8% 10%40% 7% 7% 4% 4% 30% 0% 30% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle 24% Yes I own a car No I don't own a car 20%

9% 10% 7% 7% 8% 4% 4% 0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle Yes I own a car No I don't own a car Chart 7 Chart 7 Long trips by car ownership

80% 73% 70% Chart 7 59% 60%

50% 80% 40% 73% 70% 30% 59% 60% 20% 19% 21% 20% 50% 10% 8% 40% 0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car 30% Yes I own a car No I don't own a car 20% 19% 21% 20%

Increases10% in licence8% holding and car ownership by 30+ year olds

3.13.3 Not0% surprisingly, by the time they were in their 30s a higher proportion of respondents Bus/Coach Train/tube Car in their 30s had acquired a full car licence and car ownership had also increased Yes I own a car No I don't own a car (charts 8 and 9 below). Chart 8 Licence holding by age group

Chart 8 74% Full 61% 35%

35% Provisional 24% 11%

15% None 16% 30%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

32

Chart 9

31 or more 81%

20 - 30 52%

Under 20 36%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

45% 42% 40% Chart 10 38% 37% 35% 34% 31% 30% 29%

25% 20% 20% 20% 15% 15%

10% 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 5% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 11

70% 63% 60%

50% 47% 43% 40% 40% 37%

30% 27%

20% 16% 17% 10% 10%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

70% 65%

59% 60% 57%

Chart 12 50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 13

18% Probably not 9% 9%

14% No -definitely not 8% 6%

51% Yes - perhaps 47% 37%

16% Yes - very keen 36% 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

31 or more 20 - 30 Under 20

Chart 14 5% Three or more 5% 4%

30% Two 21% 11%

53% One 53% 45%

13% None 21% 41%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Rural Suburban Central/urban Chart 8 Chart 8 74% Full 61% 35% 74% Full 61% 35% 35% Provisional 24% 11% 35% Provisional 24% 11% 15% 16% None 15% Chart 8 30% None 16% 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 74%80% Full 61% 35%0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 35% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more Provisional 24% On the Move: Exploring attitudes11% to road and rail travel in Britain

15% None 16% 30%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more Chart 9 Chart 9 Car ownership by age Chart 9 31 or more 81% 31 or more 81%

20 - 30 52% 20 - 30 52%

Under 20 36% Chart 9 Under 20 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 31 or more 81% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

3.13.4 An interesting finding is the difference between car use and car ownership. So 20 - 30 52% for example, although 85% of 30+ year olds had a licence, only 81% owned a car. Overall the whole sample, 36% of full driving licence holders had no access to a car. Under 20 36% Continued multimodal travel 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 45% 42% 3.13.5 Over 30s made more trips by car 45%and used public transport less than younger age 40% 42% Chart 10 38% 37% groups for both short and longer trips.40% However, it is clear that other modes were Chart 10 35% 34% 38% 37% also used by this age group especially walking31% for short trips (chart 10) and train for 29% 35% 34% longer30% trips (chart 11). 31% 30% 29% Chart25% 10 Main mode of transport for short local trips by age 20% 25% 20% 20% 20% 20% 45% 15% 20% 42% 15% 15% Chart 10 40% 15% 38% 10% 37% 7% 7% 35% 6% 34% 5% 5% 4% 10% 7% 5% 31% 6% 7% 29% 4% 5% 5% 30% 5% 0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle 25% 0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle 20% Under 20 20%20 - 30 31 or more 20% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 15% 15%

10% 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 5% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle Chart 11 Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more Chart 11

Chart 11 Main mode of transport for long trips by age 70% 70% 63% 60% 63% 60% Chart 11 50% 47% 50% 43% 47% 40% 40% 37% 43% 40% 40% 37% 30% 27% 70% 30% 27% 63% 20% 16% 17% 60% 20% 17% 10% 16% 10% 50% 47% 10% 10% 43% 0% 40% 40% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car 0% 37% Under 20 20 - 30 Bus/Coach31 or more Train/tube Car 30% 27% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 33 20% 16% 17% 10% 10% 70% 65% 0% 70% Bus/Coach Train/tube 65% Car 59% 60% 57% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 59% 60% 57% Chart 12 50% Chart 12 50% 40% 40% 70% 30% 65% 30% 59% 60% 57% 20% 20% Chart 12 50% 10% 10% 40% 0% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 0% 30% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

20%

Chart 13 10% Chart 13

0% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 18% Probably not 9% 9% 18% Probably not 9% 9% 14% No -definitely not 8% 6% 14% No -definitely not 8% Chart 13 6% 51% Yes - perhaps 47% 37% 51% Yes - perhaps 47% 37% 16%18% 36% YesProbably - very keen not 9% 16% 9% 48% Yes - very keen 36% 48% 0% 10% 14% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% No -definitely not 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 6% 31 or more 20 - 30 Under 20 31 or51% more 20 - 30 Under 20 Yes - perhaps 47% 37%

16% Yes - very keen 36% 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

31 or more 20 - 30 Under 20

Chart 14 Chart 14 5% Three or more 5% 4% 5% Three or more 5% 4% 30% Two 21% 11% 30% Two 21% 11% 53% One 53% 45% 53% Chart 14 One 53% 45% 5% 13% Three or Nonemore 5% 21% 41% 13% 4% None 21% 41% 0% 10% 20% 30% 30% 40% 50% 60% Two 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 11%Rural Suburban Central/urban Rural Suburban Central/urban 53% One 53% 45%

13% None 21% 41%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Rural Suburban Central/urban Chart 8 74% Full 61% 35% Chart 8 35% 74% Provisional Full 24% 61% 11% 35%

15% 35% NoneProvisional 16% 24% 11% 30%

0% 10% 20% 15%30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% None 16% Under 20 20 30%- 30 31 or more

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 9

31 or more 81% Chart 9

52% 20 - 3031 or more 81%

36% Under 20 20 - 30 52%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Under 20 36%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

45% 42% 40% Chart 10 38% 37% 35% 34% 45% 42% 31% 29% 30% 40% Chart 10 38% 37% 25% 35% 34% 20% 20% 31% 20% 30% 29% 15% 15% 25% 20% 20% 10% 20% 7% 6% 7% 15% 4% 5% 5% 5% 15%

0% 10% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 5% 5% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 11

Chart 11

70% 63% 60% 70% 50% 47% 63% 43% 60% 40% 40% 37% 50% 47% 30% 27%43% 40% 40% INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT37% COMMISSION 20% 16% 17% 30% 10% 27% 10%

20% 16% 17% 0% Bus/Coach 10% Train/tube Car 10% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

3.14 Future0% plans for car ownership Bus/Coach Train/tube Car 3.14.1 The research shows that a majorityUnder 20of all age20 -groups 30 who31 or currentlymore don’t own a car have aspirations to acquire a car either currently (chart 12) or in the future (chart 13). 70% Chart 1265% Would you like to own a car at the moment? (non-car owners =704) 59% 60% 57% 70% 65% Chart 12 50% 59% 60% 57% 40% Chart 12 50%

30% 40%

20% 30%

10% 20%

0% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more 10%

0% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 13 Chart 13 Would you like to have a car some day in the future (non car owners =704)

Chart 13 14% No - definitely not 8% 6%

18% Probably not 9% 18% Probably not 9% 9% 9% 51% 14% Yes - perhaps 47% No -definitely not 8% 6% 37% 16% 51% Yes - very keen 36% Yes - perhaps 48% 47% 37% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 16% Yes - very keen 36% 31 or more 20 - 30 Under 20 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 3.14.2 Interestingly, non-car owners over 30 were more likely to reject the idea of future ownership compared to the younger 31age or moregroups. 20 - 30 Under 20 3.14.3 Reasons for deciding against car ownership were varied but one issue to emerge was failure in the theory test especially by young working class men. Nationally, theory pass rates are an average of 63% and it would be interesting to know more about the demographics of those who fail. “I’ve taken the theory test and failed three times now. I’ve given up and accept I Chart 14 probably won’t ever pass.” (unemployed, 30 year old, Leicester, male). 5% Three or more 5% 4% Chart 14 30% Two 5% 21% Three or more 11%5% 4% 53% One 30% 53% Two 21% 45% 11% 34 13% None 21% 53% One 41% 53% 45% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 13% None 21% Rural Suburban Central/urban 41%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Rural Suburban Central/urban On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

3.14.4 For others the desire for a car was in competition with other consumer products. Recent US research shows that very few under 30 year olds named a make of car as a ‘cool’ brand and this is paralleled by UK ‘cool brand’ research in which only one automotive product (Aston Martin) is voted into the list of top 60 brands. 3.14.5 Another reason was doubt about personal driving ability. “When I was 17 I never gave driving a thought but now I’ve got children I shudder to think about the risks I took and the near misses. I stopped driving for the whole of my 20s and now I’ve lost confidence or the desire to drive. I rely on my partner and walk a lot.” (writer, aged 38, Manchester, male). 3.15 Conclusion

3.15.1 The evidence suggests that although many 20-29 year olds aspire to gain access to a car in their 30s, a sizeable minority do not or are uncertain. 3.15.2 One of the causes of uncertainly is the ability of today’s 20-29 year olds to continue with their lifestyles when they form partnerships and have children. One of the difficulties is the lack of suitable housing and other facilities such as schools for families in central urban areas where many have lived as singles in their 20s. Another difficulty is the cost of housing in city centres. This combination of reasons often drives families out to the suburbs even though they would prefer to maintain their urban lifestyle with good access to public transport and walking destinations. Once in the suburbs, car ownership becomes a greater convenience and for some essential. 3.15.3 However, we can also say that this generation of 20 year olds and indeed many in their 30s today are unlikely to resort to the levels of car ownership or use of previous generations. Their attitudes are very different in two crucial aspects. First they have learnt about how to use the public transport system which at least in urban and along intercity routes is improving and resulting in generally positive experiences. The second reason for car use staying lower is the reallocation of road space away from cars: bus lanes, good walking environments, wide pavements and cycle lanes. They make the car journey longer and incline people to stick to alternatives. 3.15.4 Another factor is the growing tendency to separate the idea of car ownership from car use and in turn consider alternative forms of car use such as car clubs, car hire, lift sharing and the growing number of hybrid combinations in between. These trends also point to a decline in second car ownership and an associated increased in the use of public transport, cycling and especially walking which typifies one car household ownership. 3.15.5 It will be a pity if a failure to acknowledge the needs of the changing mores of the younger generation is frustrated and the opportunity to adopt more sustainable patterns missed.

35 Chart 8 74% Full 61% 35%

35% Provisional 24% 11%

15% None 16% 30%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 9

31 or more 81%

20 - 30 52%

Under 20 36%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

45% 42% 40% Chart 10 38% 37% 35% 34% 31% 30% 29%

25% 20% 20% 20% 15% 15%

10% 7% 6% 7% 4% 5% 5% 5%

0% Bus Train/tube Car Walk Cycle

Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 11

70% 63% 60%

50% 47% 43% 40% 40% 37%

30% 27%

20% 16% 17% 10% 10%

0% Bus/Coach Train/tube Car Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

70% 65%

59% 60% 57%

Chart 12 50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0% Under 20 20 - 30 31 or more

Chart 13

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION 18% Probably not 9% 9%

14% No -definitely not 8% 4. RESULTS: Older People 6% 51% Yes - perhaps 47% 37%

16% Yes - very keen 36% 48%

4.1 Demographic profile 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

4.1.1 The older people who took part in the research were defined31 oras more ‘over 5520 or - 30more’. Under 20 The reason for choosing this relatively early age was that, as with the young people, we wanted to understand aspirations and lifestyle decisions which are often made in advance of major change such as giving up work. 4.1.2 In this way we also covered a range of socio economic groups and incomes. 4.1.3 In terms of residential area it is clear that older people are less likely to live in urban areas and this inevitably also influences car ownership rates. Chart 14 Car ownership by residential area (over 55s) Chart 14

5% Three or more 5% 4%

30% Two 21% 11%

53% One 53% 45%

13% None 21% 41%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Rural Suburban Central/urban

Chart 15 4.1.4 The influence of location was also apparent in the higher proportion of older people in urban areas who had a licence but didn’t drive or who were non-drivers. Chart 15 Licence holding by residential area (over 55s)

10% Licence but don't drive 10% 15%

78% Full licence 71% 54%

0% Provisional 2% 3%

12% Non driver 17% 28%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Rural Suburban Central/urban

Chart 16 36

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

Over 55 23% 16% 61%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less No change

Chart 17

Rare or never inter-work travel 38% 62%

Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60%

Frequent travel during work 44% 56%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No

Chart 18

Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17%

Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33%

Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode

Chart 19

Rare or never inter-work travel 15% 67% 18%

Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17%

Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 20

Rare or never inter-work travel 6% 68% 26%

Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20%

Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 21

Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10%

Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11%

Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 22

Rare or never inter-work travel 13% 79% 8%

Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9%

Frequent travel during work 18% 72% 10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 23

E 25% 25% 50%

D 28% 23% 49%

C2 33% 26% 41%

C1 30% 42% 28%

B 38% 47% 16%

A 43% 37% 21%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel Chart 15

10% Licence but don't drive 10% 15%

78% On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road andFull rail licence travel in Britain 71% 54%

0% Provisional 2% 3%

12% Non driver 17% 4.2 Attitudes to travel 28% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 4.2.1 The results suggest that comparedRural to youngerSuburban people, olderCentral/urban people expect to travel somewhat less in the future but there are still more older people thinking they will travel more than think they will travel less. But in addition, there is a significant change taking place in the attitudes of older people to mode choice travel with a decreasing expectation that future travel will be predominantly by car and a move towards ensuring maximum access to a range of mode choices. Chart 16 Chart 16 Thinking about the long term future do you think you will be traveling more or less than you do now in general?

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

Over 55 23% 16% 61%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less No change

4.2.2 There are a number of reasons for this change: a key factor is the experience of free and subsidised travel by public transport. This has led to a growing understanding of how public transport systems work including opportunities for paying less via advanced fare deals for both air, rail or by coach. Chart 17 4.2.3 Another reason is the desire to ensure that when one of a couple dies, the other will be able to retain their mobility. This is particularly relevant to older women who are Rare or never inter-work travel 38% 62% less likely to drive even where they hold a driving licence compared to men. Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60% “I did used to drive when the children were at school but since then I’ve let him do Frequent travel during work 44% 56% the driving.” (retired, aged 83, Peterborough, female) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% “I haven’t touched the car since John died – I don’t really need toYes – I’mNo out of practice and I go with my neighbours to the supermarket anyway.” (retired, aged 73, Woking, female) ”I drive a car but I know my time is coming, as you get older, you lose a bit of confidence so I think I will use the buses more in future.” (voluntary worker, aged 75, Tiverton, female). Chart 18 “There will come a point for me when I’ill have to stop driving and for that reason, I bought a house in the centre of Tiverton so I could still get out and about. I don’t Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17% have a parking space there and I have to rent a space in the multi-story car park 49% 18% 33% which is a 15 minute walkOccasional from inter-workmy house travel but at the moment, that is my exercise.” (nurse, aged 56, Tiverton,Frequent male) travel during work 68% 18% 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode

Chart 19

37 Rare or never inter-work travel 15% 67% 18%

Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17%

Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 20

Rare or never inter-work travel 6% 68% 26%

Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20%

Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 21

Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10%

Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11%

Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 22

Rare or never inter-work travel 13% 79% 8%

Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9%

Frequent travel during work 18% 72% 10%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 23

E 25% 25% 50%

D 28% 23% 49%

C2 33% 26% 41%

C1 30% 42% 28%

B 38% 47% 16%

A 43% 37% 21%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

4.2.4 Even when the household owns a car the tendency is to sell the second car on retirement. However, the remaining car is often an important part of the lifestyle, especially for the husband in the case of a couple. “We don’t use the car a lot – only local shopping trips – but it’s his responsibility – to both drive and maintain. After all my job hasn’t changed since we retired – I’m still the housewife – but his life has changed now he’s left the job so it’s good he’s still got the car. If he goes first I wouldn’t bother with it.” (retired, aged 75, Brotton, female) 4.2.5 Finally there is a move to downsize by selling family homes and moving to smaller and cheaper accommodation thus freeing up financial resources for retirement. This seemed to be a trend as shown by the growth of park estates and indeed some towns (especially seaside locations) are beginning to benefit from the specialist year round economy which can develop . “We moved here (Park Estate, Saltburn) from Norwich. We weighed everything up and after selling up we’ve ended up with extra money for holidays and so on. Everything’s cheaper here – and we can walk into town plus there’s free bus travel to Whitby and the train. And we all help each other here and there’s lots to do with clubs and good deals for pensioners. In addition I know the wife who doesn’t drive will be OK if I go first.” (part time electrician, aged 65, Saltburn, male)

Park Estate, Saltburn “Lots of people round here go off to Spain or Malta in the winter – you can get a cheap flight and it’s cheaper to live when you get there. It’s easy to lock up and the estate people keep an eye on things while we’re away.” (retired, age 63, Saltburn, male)

38 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

4.3 Future trends

4.3.1 The research shows that once older drivers extend their experience of other travel modes, they travel more especially for leisure. The purchase of a senior rail card is a key turning point and the new ‘Two together’ card was attractive to older couples where one was 60 or older but the other younger and thus not previously eligible for reduced rail travel. 4.3.2 The crucial importance of concessionary fares was also mentioned frequently and there were many examples of people who felt they would not be able to maintain their current lifestyles without free bus passes “Without the free bus pass I couldn’t afford to go out so often – sometimes I just go there and back for the company. I wish there was a bus on Sundays too.” (retired, age 87, Bishopston, female) 4.3.3 However, others still felt that free travel was ‘charity’ rather than entitlement and there was a related reluctance to use other ‘free’ options such as community transport. It was clear that some people took the view was that they were ‘second class’ passengers and that this was on occasion reinforced by the attitude of bus drivers. “The driver said – blimey there’s no one on this bus whose paid a fare and the bus was full with some standing.” (cleaner, aged 72, Preston, male) 4.3.4 Day trips are also important and the use of bus passes encourages travel and generally getting out for a growing number of pensioners. For many frequent users there is no longer any sense of ‘charity’ for such concessions and general understanding that bus companies benefit from the revenue. There is also resentment in areas without bus services that the concession can’t be used and this situation was another factor in leading people to consider moving. “I’ve lived in this village all my life but now there’s no regular bus service and I can’t drive anymore so I’m going to have to move. I don’t think it’s fair – we should have a concession to use taxis when there’s no bus.” (Retired, aged 77, Ponthenry, female) 4.3.5 There is also interest in new forms of mobility including scooters and electric wheelchairs and in urban areas cycling. The latter was more appealing to drivers who found the thought of sharing the road less intimidating that non drivers. “I like cycling outside the rush hours. Bikes have changed a lot since I was young and they’re a lot easier for getting up hills than they used to be. I can get about a lot better on a bike than walking and I’m thinking of getting an electric bike when I get older.” (Charity trustee, aged 78, Brockley, male)

39 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

4.4 Conclusion

4.4.1 Older people are using a wider range of modes and are less likely to rely on cars even when they own one. To enable this and to safeguard lifestyles if they or their partners can no longer drive; they are making decisions about residential location to ensure alternative access to transport. This might put further pressure on urban property but this is counter balanced by the desire to downsize and release equity which is best achieved by moving away from city centres. The latter could be a positive strategy for the economy of some of the UK’s seaside towns as well as a case for resurrecting the ‘key village’ policy from the 1960’s. 4.4.2 One key issue not fully addressed by the research is the extent to which disabled people who are disproportionately elderly are prevented from travelling due to the inaccessibility of the transport system. Undoubtedly things are improving in this respect but it does still depend on location with people in rural areas having the greatest problems. However, even in the big cities there are problems with access to transport hubs, the availability of accessible vehicles, gaps in legislation and the standard of customer care offered by transport providers.

40 Chart 15

Chart 15

Chart 15

10% Licence but don't drive 10% 15%

10% 78% Licence butFull don't licence drive 10% 71% 15% 54% 10% Licence but don't drive 0% 10% 78% FullProvisional licence 2% 15% 71% 3% 54% 78% Full licence 0% 12% 71% ProvisionalNon driver 2% 17% 54% 3% 28% 0% Provisional0% 2%10% 12%20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Non driver 3% 17% Rural 28%Suburban Central/urban 12% Non driver0% 10% 20%17% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 28% Rural Suburban Central/urban 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Rural Suburban Central/urban On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Chart 16

Chart 16 5. RESULTS: Business Travellers Chart 16 Under 55 37% 10% 53%

Over 55 23% 16% 61% Under 55 37% 10% 53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 5.1 37%Commuting 10% and inter-work53% travel distinctions UnderOver 55 23% 16% 61% Travel more Travel less No change 5.1.1 The business travellers were selected to provide a combination of people who mainly Over 55 0% 23% 20% 16% 40% 60% 61% 80% 100% Travelcommuted, more or whoTravel occasionally less Noor changefrequently travelled as part of their work. In official 0% 20%statistics, work40% related travel60% is divided 80%and described100% as commuting or business but Travelwe morehave describedTravel the less latter as No‘inter-work change travel’. 5.1.2 Around 42% of all the 712 business travellers said that their pattern of travel had

Chart 17 changed over the past two years – the majority reporting travelling more. Chart 17 Would you say your general travel patterns have changed in the last Chart 17 twoRare oryears? never inter-work travel 38% 62% Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60% Chart 17 Rare or never inter-work travel 38% 62% Frequent travel during work 44% 56% Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60% Rare or never inter-work travel0% 20%38% 40% 60% 62% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 44% Yes No 56% Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 44% 56% Yes No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 5.1.3 Of these the majority are travelling more especiallyYes No for frequent inter work travellers. Chart 18 How would you say your general travel patterns have changed in the Chart 18 last two years?

Chart 18 Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17%

Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33% Chart 18 Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17% Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14% Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33% Rare or never inter-work travel 0% 20% 61% 40% 60% 23%80% 17%100% Frequent travel during work Travel more 68%Travel less Travel by18% different 14% mode Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14% 5.1.4 The following tables showTravel trends more in the Travelamount less of travelTravel byby differentmode. modeThe results 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% show that for all except bus, the change has resulted in more travel by all modes Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode for frequent travellers in the course of work. In addition even occasional travellers Chart 19 are generally travelling more – perhaps not unexpected in the light of the economic growth which has occurred in recent years. Chart 19 5.1.5 Current car users –travel has changed in the past two years – those not travelling Rare or never inter-work travel 15% 67% 18% Chart 19 during work are using cars less: those travelling during work are using cars more. Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17% ChartRare or never 19 Mode inter-work of travel travel 15%- Car 67% 18% Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13% Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17% Rare or never inter-work travel0% 15% 20% 40% 67% 60% 80% 18%100% Frequent travel during work 27% More Same60% Less 13% Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 20 41

Chart 20 Rare or never inter-work travel 6% 68% 26% Chart 20 Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20% Rare or never inter-work travel 6% 68% 26% Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17% Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20% Rare or never inter-work travel 0%6% 20% 40%68% 60% 80% 26% 100% Frequent travel during work 25% More Same58% Less 17% Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 21

Chart 21 Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10% Chart 21 Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11% Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10% Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13% Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11% Rare or never inter-work travel0% 25%20% 40% 65%60% 80% 10%100% Frequent travel during work 31% More Same 57% Less 13% Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 22

Chart 22 Rare or never inter-work travel 13% 79% 8% Chart 22 Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9% Rare or never inter-work travel 13% 79% 8% Frequent travel during work 18% 72% 10% Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9% Rare or never inter-work travel0% 13% 20% 40% 79% 60% 80% 8%100% Frequent travel during work 18% More Same72% Less 10% Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 18% 72% 10% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 23

Chart 23

25% 25% 50% Chart 23 E

DE 25%28% 25%23% 50%49%

E 25% 25% 50% C2D 28%33% 23% 26% 49%41%

D 28% 23% 49% C2C1 30%33% 26% 42% 41% 28%

C2 33% 26% 41% C1B 30%38% 42% 47% 28% 16%

C1 30% 42% 28% BA 38%43% 37%47% 21%16%

B 0% 38%20% 40% 60%47% 80% 16% 100% A 43% 37% 21% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel A 0% 20%43% 40% 60%37% 80% 21% 100%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel Chart 15

Chart 15

Chart 15 10% Licence but don't drive 10% 15%

78% Full licence 10% 71% 54% Licence but don't drive 10% 15% 0% 10% Provisional 2% Licence but don't drive 3% 10% 78% Full licence 15% 71% 54% 12% 78% Non driver 17% Full licence 0% 28% 71% Provisional 2% 54% 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 0% Provisional 2% 12% Non driver 3% Rural17% Suburban Central/urban 28% 12% Non driver0% 10% 20%17% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 28% Rural Suburban Central/urban 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Rural Suburban Central/urban

Chart 16

Chart 16

Under 55 37% 10% 53% Chart 16

Over 55 23% 16% 61%

Under 55 37% 10% 53% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less No change UnderOver 55 23% 37% 16% 10% 61%53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Over 55 23% 16% 61% Travel more Travel less No change 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less No change

Chart 17

Rare or never inter-work travel 38% 62% Chart 17 Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60%

Frequent travel during work 44% 56% Chart 17 Rare or never inter-work travel 38% 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60% Rare or never inter-work travel 38% Yes No 62% Frequent travel during work 44% 56% Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 44% 56% Yes No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No

Chart 18

Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17% Chart 18 Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33%

Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14% Chart 18 Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33% Rare or never inter-work travel Travel more 61%Travel less Travel23% by different17% mode Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14% Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14% Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode Chart 19

Chart 19 Rare or never inter-work travel 15% 67% 18%

Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17% Chart 19 Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13% Rare or never inter-work travel 15% 67% 18% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17% Rare or never inter-work travel 15% More Same67% Less 18% Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13% Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17% On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain 0% 20% 40% INDEPENDENT60% 80% TRANSPORT 100% COMMISSION Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less Chart 20

5.1.6 Current train users have also changed their travel in the past two years – those not Chart 20 Raretravelling or never during inter-work work travel are 6% using trains less:68% those travelling during26% work are using

trainsOccasional more. inter-work travel 19% 61% 20% Chart 20 ChartFrequent 20 travel Mode during of worktravel - 25%Train 58% 17% Rare or never inter-work travel 6% 68% 26% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20% Rare or never inter-work travel 6% More 68% Same Less 26% Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17% Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less Chart 21 5.1.7 Current walking to or during work has also changed in the past two years – with more people walking more than walking less. Chart 21 Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10% Chart 21 Mode of travel - Walk Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11% Chart 21

Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13% Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11% Rare or never inter-work travel 25% More Same65% Less 10% Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13% Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13% More Same Less 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 5.1.8 Current cycling to or during work – hereMore againSame there areLess more people cycling more than cycling less over the past two years. Chart 22 Chart 22 Mode of travel - Cycling

Chart 22 Rare or never inter-work travel 13% 79% 8%

Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9% Chart 22 Frequent travel during work 18% 72% 10% Rare or never inter-work travel 13% 79% 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Occasional inter-work travel 15% 76% 9% Rare or never inter-work travel 13% More Same79% Less 8% Frequent travel during work 18% 72% 10% 15% 76% 9% 5.1.9 In Occasionalcomparison inter-work with travelall the above modes, current bus users who report travel change 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% in theFrequent past travel two during years work are the18% only group with higher72% proportions using10% bus less than More Same Less are using buses more. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 5.1.10 The conclusion is that business travelMore is increasingSame and Lessthat all modes are being used

Chart 23 to meet this demand apart from bus.

Chart 23 E 25% 25% 50%

Chart 23 D 28% 23% 49% E 25% 25% 50%

C2 33% 26% 41% 25% 25% 50% DE 28% 23% 49%

C1 30% 42% 28% 28% 23% 49% C2D 33% 26% 41% B 38% 47% 16% 42 33% 26% 41% C1C2 30% 42% 28%

A 43% 37% 21% 30% 42% 28% C1B 38% 47% 16% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

38% 47% 16% BA Frequent travel during43% work Occasional inter-work travel37% Rare or never inter-work21% travel

A 0% 20%43% 40% 60%37% 80% 21% 100% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

5.2 Are attitudes to commuting changing?

5.2.1 Most people disliked commuting whichever method of transport was used and described the compromises they had made in juggling house prices, schools, time and travel costs to arrive at their current situation. The advantages of lower rents or house prices was seen as a reason for moving out of city centres but this was seen as changing due to the higher cost of rail fares. “When we moved here (Woking) I worked out that I was about £2,000 a year better off but now the cost of my season ticket has gone up I reckon it’s about evens. I’d still prefer to live out of London in principle but not getting a seat on the train means that this is dead time unless you count listening to music.” (accountant, aged 37. Woking, male) 5.2.2 It is clear that the cost, time and lack of comfort associated with commuting is leading to pressure to work from home – at least some of the time. In this respect, the recent move to offer part time season tickets was welcomed and judged to be a good ‘push factor’ to encourage employers to agree to more flexible working arrangements. “The boss is a bit of a control freak and didn’t like my suggestion of working at home on Fridays but the job covers travel costs so he realised they’d save money and now it’s generally accepted and in fact I’m going to try for Mondays at home next year.” (Building society assistant, aged 42, Birmingham, female) 5.2.3 Overall, there was a lot of support for home working although mainly for one or two days a week. More than this was felt to be isolating. These views were also shared by employers who welcomed the time saved by flexible hours but nevertheless wanted to retain frequent face to face contact. “I wasn’t keen at first but they agreed to use tracking on the company phones and keep in contact during agreed hours and to be honest I reckon productivity has increased including reducing staff turnover especially by women.” (Hedge betting company, 50s, Leeds, female) “This office was built to use human beings to supplement the heating system but since it opened more people are working from home so the system isn’t working efficiently!” (Consultant, working in central London and living in St Albans) 5.2.4 Some people were also working different hours to avoid peak travel or reduce costs. 5.2.5 Examples included three long 12 hour days and/or starting late or early or even different combinations on different days. Both employers and staff were receptive to this approach and many benefits were described. “I can get an off-peak train ticket now – it saves a lot.” “With on average a fifth working from home on any one day we’ve reduced the car park area and transferred it to additional office space.” (Manager, Building company, Woking) 5.2.6 However, it should not be assumed that working from home automatically leads to less travel. Both our discussions with people who worked from home and other research9 shows that extra travel takes place during the day (going out for lunch, etc).

9 British Journal of Sociology Vol 54 (2003) p 155-275 Urry, J. “Social Networks, Travel and Talk” 43 Also an extensive literature review for DfT (2013) “Modelling Carbon: Travel Demand Modelling” (unpublished) Chart 15

10% Licence but don't drive 10% 15%

78% Full licence 71% 54%

0% Provisional 2% 3%

12% Non driver 17% 28%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Rural Suburban Central/urban

Chart 16

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

Over 55 23% 16% 61%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less No change

Chart 17

Rare or never inter-work travel 38% 62%

Occasional inter-work travel 40% 60%

Frequent travel during work 44% 56%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No

Chart 18

Rare or never inter-work travel 61% 23% 17%

Occasional inter-work travel 49% 18% 33%

Frequent travel during work 68% 18% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode

Chart 19

Rare or never inter-work travel 15% 67% 18%

Occasional inter-work travel 24% 59% 17%

Frequent travel during work 27% 60% 13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 20

Rare or never inter-work travel 6% 68% 26%

Occasional inter-work travel 19% 61% 20%

Frequent travel during work 25% 58% 17%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

Chart 21

Rare or never inter-work travel 25% 65% 10%

Occasional inter-work travel 27% 62% 11%

Frequent travel during work 31% 57% 13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% More Same Less

INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Chart 22

5.2.7 Similarly,Rare it seems or never thatinter-work people travel who 13% make maximum use79% of electronic communication,8% videoing, Skype,Occasional etc inter-work actually travel end up15% travelling more due76% to wider networks.9%

“I do a lot ofFrequent business travel remotelyduring work by 18%email and talk face to72% face by my phone10% or Skype at all hours of the day and night0% too but 20%I reckon 40%it leads to60% more rather80% than100% less travel – you want to see people and the newMore technology Same gives Lessyou contacts with more people.” (self employed blogger, Market Harborough, aged 28, female) 5.3 Are inter-work patterns of travel changing?

5.3.1 The cross tabulations show that amongst our sample inter-work travel is more

Chart 23 common amongst white collar groups. Chart 23 Socio-Economic Group values

E 25% 25% 50%

D 28% 23% 49%

C2 33% 26% 41%

C1 30% 42% 28%

B 38% 47% 16%

A 43% 37% 21%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

5.3.2 It also shows that frequent inter-work travellers are more likely to travel to work by car than those who are only commuters or make only infrequent inter-work trips. Similarly those making inter-work trips are more likely to have a household car and to see getting a new car as a priority.

44 3% Varies 3% On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel2% in Britain

3% Other 1% 1%

1% Van 1% Chart 24 Main mode of travel5% for work

Chart 24 3% 5% VariesCycle 3% 5% 1%2%

3% 14% OtherWalk 1% 11% 1% 7%

1% 24% Bus/metro/undergroundVan 1% 20% 5% 18%

Chart 24 5% 8% CycleTrain 5% 15% 1% 12%

5% 14% Car as a passengerWalk 9%11% 5%7%

24% 37% Bus/metro/undergroundCar as a driver 20% 34% 18% 48%

0% 8%10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 15% Frequent travel duringTrain work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel 12%

5% Car as a passenger 9% 5%

37% Car as a driver 34% 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 25 Chart 25 Household car ownership

4% Three or more 6% 6%

19% Two 22% 31% Chart 25 44% One 49% 51% 4% Three or more 6% 33% None 6% 23% 12% 19% Two0% 10% 20% 22% 30% 40% 50% 60% 31% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

44% One 49% 51%

33% 45 None 23% 12%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel Chart 26

17% Maybe 12% 18%

24% No 19% Chart 26 11%

59% 17% Yes 69% Maybe 12% 71% 18%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 24% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel No 19% 11%

59% Yes 69% 71% Chart 27

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Indian 14%

Any other group 15% Chart 27 Caribbean 5%

African 9%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 9% Indian 14%

White European 41% Any other group 15%

White other 6% Caribbean 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

African 9% Frequent travel during work

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 9%

White European 41%

White other 6% Chart 28

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 13% Frequent travel during work E 16%

8% D 15%

10% C2 12%

Chart 28 31% C1 29%

13% E 16% 26% B 21%

8% D 11% 15% A 7%

10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% C2 12% Born in UK or lived 10 years or more Migrants 31% C1 29%

26% B 21%

11% A Chart 29 7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Born in UK or lived 10 years or more Migrants 17% Walk - leisure 12%

13% Walk - shopping 20%

15% Walk - education 22%

9% Chart 29 Walk - work 16%

54% Car - leisure 37%

17% 60% WalkCar - -shopping leisure 12% 44%

13% 42% WalkCar -- shoppingeducation 20% 28%

15% 49% Walk - educationCar - work 22% 25%

0% 10%9% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Walk - work 16% Non migrant Migrant 54% Car - leisure 37%

60% Car - shopping 44%

42% Car - education 28%

49% Car - work 25%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Non migrant Migrant 3% Varies 3% 2%

3% Other 1% 1%

1% Van 1% 5%

Chart 24 5% Cycle 5% 1%

14% Walk 11% 7%

24% Bus/metro/underground 20% 18%

8% Train 15% 12%

5% Car as a passenger 9% 5%

37% Car as a driver 34% 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 25

4% Three or more 6% 6%

19% Two 22% 31%

44% One 49% 51%

33% None 23% 12%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Chart 26 Chart 26 Is a new car a priority?

17% Maybe 12% 18%

24% No 19% 11%

59% Yes 69% 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

5.3.3 The conclusion is that inter work travellers are more likely to be car focused than those who don’t travel during work. 5.4 Conclusion Chart 27 5.4.1 People are travelling more for both commuting and business travel. Commuting distances are growing driven by the need to access cheaper housing and other factors such as dual career families and school allocations. 5.4.2 Attitudes of both employers and employees are changing – for many occupations the work place is flexible although still involving the concept of a ‘base’ location. People Indian 14% are working at different times at home, in coffee bars, local hubs, in their cars, on

public transportAny other andgroup whilst walking. 15% 5.4.3 These trends are increasingly enabled by technology and to some extent by the 5% transport industry.Caribbean However, there is a long way to go to fully support this trend including in relation to fares structures, vehicle design, planning and housing policy. African 9% On a wider basis the practice of working from home is leading to tax and planning confusion but also new design, architectural and development opportunities. Pakistani/Bangladeshi 9% 5.4.4 In terms of in business travel, there is undoubtedly some travel substitution by methods Whitesuch European as video conferencing, Skype and so on but this does not 41%seem to result in less travel overall – rather it leads to wider networking and there is still a strong desireWhite for otherface to face meetings.6%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Frequent travel during work

Chart 28

13% E 16% 46

8% D 15%

10% C2 12%

31% C1 29%

26% B 21%

11% A 7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Born in UK or lived 10 years or more Migrants

Chart 29

17% Walk - leisure 12%

13% Walk - shopping 20%

15% Walk - education 22%

9% Walk - work 16%

54% Car - leisure 37%

60% Car - shopping 44%

42% Car - education 28%

49% Car - work 25%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Non migrant Migrant 3% Varies 3% 2%

3% Other 1% 1%

1% Van 1% 5%

Chart 24 5% Cycle 5% 1%

14% Walk 11% 7%

24% Bus/metro/underground 20% 18%

8% Train 15% 12%

5% Car as a passenger 9% 5%

37% Car as a driver 34% 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 25

4% Three or more 6% 6%

19% Two 22% 31%

44% One 49% 51%

33% None 23% 12%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 26

17% Maybe 12% 18%

24% 19% On the Move: Exploring attitudesNo to road and rail travel in Britain 11%

59% Yes 69% 6. RESULTS: Migrants 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

6.1 Less car use and more walking

6.1.1 For the purposes of this research migrants were defined as people who had lived in the UK for less than ten years. Areas of the country with high proportions of migrants

Chart 27 in this category were targeted for the face to face research including Peterborough, Leicester, Leeds, Brighton, London, Watford, Birmingham and Cardiff. Of the 586 migrants in the sample, 41% were from other European countries. Chart 27 Sample profile

Indian 14%

Any other group 15%

Caribbean 5%

African 9%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 9%

White European 41%

White other 6%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Frequent travel during work

6.1.2 The final profile including the UK wide electronic results show that migrants are more likely to be living in urban areas and are disproportionately represented in socio economic groups C2/D/E compared with non-migrants. In addition migrants have other priorities such as housing which can be more expensive in urban areas and so

Chart 28 less to spend on cars or travel in general. “It’’s hard to get established in a new country. I’ve got teaching qualifications from Estonia but they’re not recognised13% here so I’m working in a shop. The money is E better than back home but still not16% enough to leave much over after I’ve sent some

home. I’m saving8% up to bring my family over but it’s going to take a while. Most D days I take the tube to zone 2 and15% walk from there. (shop assistant, aged 35, East London, male) 10% C2 12%

31% C1 29%

26% B 21%

11% A 7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 47 Born in UK or lived 10 years or more Migrants

Chart 29

17% Walk - leisure 12%

13% Walk - shopping 20%

15% Walk - education 22%

9% Walk - work 16%

54% Car - leisure 37%

60% Car - shopping 44%

42% Car - education 28%

49% Car - work 25%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Non migrant Migrant 3% Varies 3% 2%

3% 3% Varies 3% Other2% 1% 1%

3% 1% Other 1% 1%Van 1% 5%

Chart 24 1% 5% Van 1% Cycle 5% 5% 1% Chart 24 5% Cycle 5% 14% Walk1% 11% 7%

14% 24% Walk 11% Bus/metro/underground 7% 20% 18% 24% 8% Bus/metro/underground 20%15% Train 18% 12%

8% 5% Train 15% Car as a passenger 12%9% 5%

5% 37% Car as a passenger 9% 34% Car as a driver 5% 48%

37% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Car as a driver 34% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare48% or never inter-work travel

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 25

Chart 25 4% Three or more 6% 6% 4% Three or more 6% 19% Two 6% 22% 31% 19% Two 22% 44% One 31% 49% 51% 44% One 33% 49% None 23% 51% 12% 33% None 0% 10% 20%23% 30% 40% 50% 60% 12% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 26

Chart 26 17% Maybe 12% 18% 17% Maybe 12% 18% 24% No 19% 11% 24% No 19% 11% 59% Yes 69% 71% 59% 69% Yes 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 71% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Frequent travel during work Occasional inter-work travel Rare or never inter-work travel

Chart 27

Chart 27

Indian 14%

Any other group 15% Indian 14%

Caribbean 5% Any other group 15%

African 9% Caribbean 5%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 9% African 9%

White European 41% Pakistani/Bangladeshi 9%

White other 6% White European 41% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% White other 6% Frequent travel during work

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% INDEPENDENT25% 30% 35% TRANSPORT 40% 45% COMMISSION Frequent travel during work

Chart 28 Chart 28 Socio-Economic Group value

Chart 28 13% E 16%

8% D 13% E 16%15%

10% C2 8% D 12%15%

31% C1 10% C2 12% 29%

26% B 31% C1 21% 29%

11% A 26% B 7% 21%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 11% A 7% Born in UK or lived 10 years or more Migrants

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 6.1.3 These two factors are influential in producing distinct travel patterns and attitudes to Born in UK or lived 10 years or more Migrants travel. Thus car ownership and licence holding is lower compared to longer standing residents and not surprisingly car as a mode of travel for work and all other purposes is lower. In contrast walking is much more frequent (with bus a little more frequent). Chart 29 These patterns also reflect the long hours which some migrants work and also for some the provision of work buses especially those employed in remote rural areas or building sites. Chart 29 17% Chart 29Walk Modal - leisure choice 12%

13% Walk - shopping 17% 20% Walk - leisure 12% 15% Walk - education 13% 22% Walk - shopping 20% 9% Walk - work 15% 16% Walk - education 22% 54% Car - leisure 9% 37% Walk - work 16% 60% Car - shopping 44%54% Car - leisure 37% 42% Car - education 28% 60% Car - shopping 44% 49% Car - work 25% 42% Car - education 28% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 49% Car - work 25%Non migrant Migrant

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Non migrant Migrant

48 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

6.2 Locality

6.2.1 However, car ownership is not the only influence on mode choice. As with all groups in the total sample, car ownership increases with higher rates in rural areas than urban and with suburban in between. However most migrants live in urban areas and there is also a tendency for migrants to cluster in residential areas near to work and specialist shops and other community facilities which are likely to be within walking distance and this applies to all migrant groups albeit with different socio economic profiles. “I moved to Battersea because there’s a lot of French speaking people round here ...in restaurants, my doctor and a French nursery school.” (unwaged, mother, aged 38, London) “The Golden Mile is brilliant (Leicester specialist food and jewellery centre). We love living in the area – everything’s handy.” (self employed, aged 40s, Leicester originally from Sri Lanka) 6.3 Length of residence

6.3.1 Another factor is the length of time that migrants were planning to stay, with many Europeans especially expecting to return to their country of origin. “There’s no real need for a car here in Leeds and anyway I’ll wait until I go home in a few years to think about getting one.” (factory worker, Italian, 20s) 6.3.2 Similarly, air travel was a more important factor in explaining travel expenditure with holidays frequently related to travelling back to the country of origin. “We don’t go on holiday in the UK – our whole family fly home to Albania every other year.” (university administrator, Czech living in Bradford, 40s) 6.4 Cultural comparisons and influences

6.4.1 There is a strong tendency for migrants to compare their experience of transport in their home countries to those in the UK, for example in terms of concessionary fares, vehicle design and information. Generally public transport in the UK was seen as more expensive than in other European cities but others from more originally rural communities welcomed the comprehensiveness of the UK urban transport ‘offer’. The extent to which comparisons were favourable or unfavourable was a strong influence on public transport use. “In Germany students get free transport. When I came here it was cheaper to get a car.” (student, 20s, Reading, originally from Malaysia) “In South Africa I had to have a car for personal safety so it’s great to be here where the underground and even the night buses are safe.” (builder, 40s, Woolwich)

49 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

6.4.2 Another comparison was made with facilities and attitudes towards cycling in the UK compared to other European countries. There was general agreement that motorists were more aware of cyclist safety elsewhere. “When you first get here you are shocked by the way motorists behave. I was nearly killed – they just don’t seem to see you and it’s made worse by the lack of cycle lanes here.” (teacher, originally living in Denmark now in Cardiff, 60s) “I don’t know the figures but I would bet that a lot of the cyclists who get knocked down are foreign and not used to the traffic conditions for cyclists in London.” (hostess, originally from Holland living in London, aged 39) 6.5 Attitudes to car ownership

6.5.1 Lower rates of car use and ownership don’t imply that they will continue as migrants become settled. Nearly a quarter of migrants aspired to car ownership with two thirds

Chart 30 of these judging this to be a priority albeit one that would take a while to achieve. Chart 30 Car ownership

4% Three or more 3%

23% Two 19%

50% One 48%

23% None 31%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

6.5.2 Indeed acquiring a car was seen as a sign of economic and social progress. “We hired a posh car for the weekend and sent back a photo to my grandma pretending it was ours – she was so pleased.” (roofer, originally from Ethiopia now in Luton, aged 30s, male) Chart 31

28% Maybe 11%

49% No 80%

50 23% Yes 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 32

Indian 47% 39% 14%

Any other group 50% 42% 8%

Caribbean 59% 27% 14%

African 49% 44% 8%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 54% 29% 17%

White European 52% 31% 17%

White UK 27% 37% 36%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central/urban Suburban Market town/rural

Chart 33

Indian 13% 29% 29% 12% 8% 8%

Any other group 10% 31% 27% 8% 11% 13%

Caribbean 6% 12% 30% 10% 15% 27%

African 10% 23% 29% 12% 8% 17%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 5% 14% 20% 11% 19% 32%

White European 6% 23% 34% 13% 16% 8%

White UK 11% 26% 30% 10% 8% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

A B C1 C2 D E

Chart 34

Indian 17% 43% 33% 7%

Any other group 26% 51% 19% 4%

Caribbean 40% 43% 12% 4%

African 32% 44% 20% 4%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 30% 44% 20% 7%

White European 29% 50% 18% 3%

White UK 19% 50% 25% 6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None One Two Three or more Chart 30 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

4% Three or more 3%

6.5.3 For others, a car albeit a cheap one was essential for work purposes especially 23% for rural andTwo shift workers and in this context there was a tradition of car sharing 19% amongst work groups or even families. This led to problems amongst some communities in terms of legality and insurance rules who were used to a system 50% whereby theOne vehicle rather than the driver were insured. Others were unclear about the rules for licence holding and the validity of licences from other48% countries. “In Poland the whole family paid for the car insurance and when my brother crashed 23% it we all chippedNone in for the repairs.” (electrician, 40s, Preston, male) 31% “If you go across to France for the day you can carry on using your international licence for another0% year.”10% (gym instructor,20% 20s,30% originally 40% Polish living50% in Brighton,60% female) Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant 6.5.4 Nevertheless, it is clear from the research that car use is lower amongst migrant groups for economic and locational reasons and this is demonstrated by the majority of those who don’t currently have a car (a third) not planning to buy one in the near future.

Chart 31 Chart 31 Do you expect to have a car in the coming year?

28% Maybe 11%

49% No 80%

23% Yes 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 32

Indian 47% 39% 14%

Any other group 50% 42% 8%

Caribbean 59% 27% 14% 51 African 49% 44% 8%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 54% 29% 17%

White European 52% 31% 17%

White UK 27% 37% 36%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central/urban Suburban Market town/rural

Chart 33

Indian 13% 29% 29% 12% 8% 8%

Any other group 10% 31% 27% 8% 11% 13%

Caribbean 6% 12% 30% 10% 15% 27%

African 10% 23% 29% 12% 8% 17%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 5% 14% 20% 11% 19% 32%

White European 6% 23% 34% 13% 16% 8%

White UK 11% 26% 30% 10% 8% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

A B C1 C2 D E

Chart 34

Indian 17% 43% 33% 7%

Any other group 26% 51% 19% 4%

Caribbean 40% 43% 12% 4%

African 32% 44% 20% 4%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 30% 44% 20% 7%

White European 29% 50% 18% 3%

White UK 19% 50% 25% 6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None One Two Three or more INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

6.6 Coaches

6.6.1 Many of the migrants had experience of coach travel. European migrants had often travelled by coach from their countries of birth to the UK and also for visits home. Others made use of the UK internal coach system mainly for educational travel or for work. This was mainly on grounds of cost but also in some cases with well- established routes - for convenience. “Megabus is great – I’ve managed to get fares under £10 all the way to Scotland.” (student, aged 19, originally from Australia living in Brighton, female) “There’s a lot of overnight coaches from Victoria to Poland including to my home city which isn’t convenient by air and a lot more expensive too. It may take longer but you can go door to door without a lot of hassle.” (unemployed, living in London, male) 6.7 Legislative issues

6.7.1 There were many references to the different licencing and insurance regimes especially in different European countries. “It’s OK if you live down south, re validating your EU licence every 6 months when combined with a cigarette and booze shopping run makes it feasible, covering the ferry costs, but a bit dodgy to tell the truth.” (unemployed, living in Wakefield, aged 30s, male) 6.7.2 The cost of insurance was a key factor although not so much of an issue for older migrants but there was general agreement that it was prohibitive for people under 25. “They’d be better off going back to Poland” (Polish, over 25 years old, male) 6.7.3 Others mentioned the incompatibility of insurance rules. “I had big problems getting my insurance transferred from Germany to England – you wouldn’t think we’re supposed to have a common EU transport policy.” (translator, aged 35, Peterborough)

52 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

6.8 Left hand driving

6.8.1 For some people, the need to get used to left hand driving was a mental barrier and although it was agreed by licence holders that it was not a problem, it did seem to act as a mental barrier for some resulting in tipping the scale against car use at least during the early stages of arrival in the UK. “I was nervous about driving and had a lot else to cope with so I didn’t get a car and somehow now I don’t think I’ll bother.” (shop assistant, aged 21, originally from Greece living in Romford, female) “I think I need lessons first – maybe I’ll go for a car after that but I don’t really need one anyway.” (doorman, aged 55+, originally from Mozambique, living in Manchester, male) “I thought about bringing my car over (from France) but in the end I thought it’d be safer to get a right hand drive although I haven’t got around to it yet.” (student, London, female) 6.9 Conclusion

6.9.1 Both the country of origin and the planned length of stay in the UK affect car ownership rates. Migrants as a whole are less likely to travel by car than non- migrants but the longer migrants live here the more likely they are to acquire a car. However, the habit of walking and proximity to destinations is likely to continue so overall car as a mode will not increase as fast as the population growth of this group would otherwise indicate from simple extrapolation.

53 Chart 30

4% Three or more 3%

23% Two 19%

50% One 48%

23% None 31%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 31

28% Maybe 11%

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION 49% No 80%

7. RESULTS:23% BAME Groups Yes 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 7.1Born in the UKDemographic or lived 10 years of more factorsMigrant

7.1.1 It is clear from the literature review and demographic profile of the research sample that there are huge differences between and within ethnic groups in terms of socio economic and residential location which influence attitudes to transport and travel patterns. 7.1.2 In our sample there is a major difference between the white UK population and other ethnic groups with the latter on average twice as likely to live in urban areas. Chart 32 Chart 32 Residential area

Indian 47% 39% 14%

Any other group 50% 42% 8%

Caribbean 59% 27% 14%

African 49% 44% 8%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 54% 29% 17%

White European 52% 31% 17%

White UK 27% 37% 36%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central/urban Suburban Market town/rural

7.1.3 In terms of differences between different ethnic groups, people of Indian, Jewish, and far eastern ethnicity were more affluent compared to those of Caribbean and Pakistani/Bangladeshi origin.

Chart 33

Indian 13% 29% 29% 12% 8% 8%

Any other group 10% 31% 27% 8% 11% 13%

Caribbean 6% 12% 30% 10% 15% 27%

African 10% 23% 29% 12% 8% 17%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 5% 14% 20% 11% 19% 32% 54

White European 6% 23% 34% 13% 16% 8%

White UK 11% 26% 30% 10% 8% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

A B C1 C2 D E

Chart 34

7% 4% 4% Three or more 4% 7% 3% 6%

33% 19% 12% Two 20% 20% 18% 25%

43% 51% 43% One 44% 44% 50% 50%

26% 26% 40% None 32% 30% 29% 19%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African

Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK Chart 30

4% Three or more 3%

23% Two 19%

50% One 48%

23% None 31%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 31

28% Maybe 11%

49% No 80%

23% Yes 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 32

Indian 47% 39% 14%

Any other group 50% 42% 8%

Caribbean 59% 27% 14%

African 49% 44% 8%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 54% 29% 17%

White European 52% 31% 17%

White UK 27% 37% 36%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central/urban Suburban Market town/rural

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Chart 33

Chart 33 Socio-Economic Group values

Indian 13% 29% 29% 12% 8% 8%

Any other group 10% 31% 27% 8% 11% 13%

Caribbean 6% 12% 30% 10% 15% 27%

African 10% 23% 29% 12% 8% 17%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 5% 14% 20% 11% 19% 32%

White European 6% 23% 34% 13% 16% 8%

White UK 11% 26% 30% 10% 8% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

A B C1 C2 D E

7.2 The Indian community compared to other BAME groups

7.2.1 Such differences also relate to the relative affluence of the Indian community, many of whom told of growing incomes, increased travel and car ownership within the past Chart 34 two years. “I’d say that the recession has given the Indian community an advantage over the white population. We tend to finance our businesses from within the family and don’t rely on banks so much. We’re more resilient to recession.” (self -employed auto business,Indian Leicester, 17% aged 50, male)43% 33% 7% 7.2.2 Thus Indians had similar rates of car ownership to the White UK population and Any other group 26% 51% 19% 4% indeed were more likely to live in two plus car households than all other BAME

groups. RatesCaribbean of licence holding40% were also higher than43% for other BAME12% 4%groups. “In our community cars are a sign that the family is doing well so we tend to get high end carsAfrican to back this32% up. After all as we still44% live in the same20% area 4%which is all terraced houses your car is the main way of showing it.” (Asian (Indian) business Pakistani/Bangladeshiwoman, Evington, originally30% from Madagascan44% origin, 40+) 20% 7%

“I boughtWhite Europeanboth my sons cars29% for their 18th birthdays50% and I’ll do the18% same 3% for my daughter. What’s the point of working hard if you can’t have something to show for it?” (businessWhite man, UK Leeds,19% Asian Indian origin)50% 25% 6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None One Two Three or more

55 Chart 30

4% Three or more 3%

23% Two 19%

50% One 48%

23% None 31%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 31

28% Maybe 11%

49% No 80%

23% Yes 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Born in the UK or lived 10 years of more Migrant

Chart 32

Indian 47% 39% 14%

Any other group 50% 42% 8%

Caribbean 59% 27% 14%

African 49% 44% 8%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 54% 29% 17%

White European 52% 31% 17%

White UK 27% 37% 36%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central/urban Suburban Market town/rural

Chart 33

Indian 13% 29% 29% 12% 8% 8%

Any other group 10% 31% 27% 8% 11% 13%

Caribbean 6% 12% 30% 10% 15% 27%

African 10% 23% 29% 12% 8% 17%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 5% 14% 20% 11% 19% 32%

White European 6% 23% 34% 13% 16% 8%

White UK 11% 26% 30% 10% 8% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

A B C1 C2 D E

Chart 34

INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Chart 34 Household car ownership

7% 4% 4% Three or more 4% 7% 3% 6%

33% 19% 12% Two 20% 20% 18% 25%

43% 51% 43% One 44% 44% 50% 50%

26% 26% 40% None 32% 30% 29% 19%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African

Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 35 Licence holding Chart 35

5% 9% 11% Licence but don't drive 13% 19% 13% 9%

72% 61% 51% Full licence 58% 51% 64% 74%

11% 10% 8% Provisional 9% 13% 4% 4%

12% 20% 31% Non driver 20% 17% 19% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African

Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK 56

Chart 36

Indian 73% 18% 9%

Any other group 58% 32% 11%

Caribbean 48% 33% 18%

African 59% 18% 22%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 55% 38% 8%

White European 56% 14% 30%

White UK 49% 33% 18%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode

46% 23% 35% Chart 37 Car - leisure 39% 34% 23% 43%

51% 35% 33% Car - shopping 39% 33% 35% 55%

34% 22% 15% Car – education 26% 21% 41%

45% 27% 35% Car – work 36% 38% 29% 44%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Indian Any other group Caribbean

African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European

White UK

Chart 38

Indian 32% 15% 53%

Any other group 28% 9% 62%

Caribbean 32% 15% 53%

African 37% 14% 50%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 34% 16% 50%

White European 34% 10% 56%

White UK 15% 14% 71%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change

Chart 39

Indian 21% 18% 61%

Any other group 15% 12% 72%

Caribbean 19% 12% 69%

African 26% 15% 59%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 26% 13% 61%

White European 10% 13% 77%

White UK 8% 11% 80%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change Chart 35 5% 9% Chart 35 11% Licence but don't drive 13% 5% 19% 9%13% 11% 9% Licence but don't drive 13% 19% 13% 72% 9% 61% 51% Full licence 58% 51% 72% 61%64% 51% 74% Full licence 58% 51% 11% 64% 10% 74% 8% Provisional 9% 11%13% 4% 10% 4% 8% Provisional 9% 13% 4% 12% 4% 20% 31% Non driver 20% 12%17% 20% 19% 31% 14% Non driver 20% 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 19% Indian 14% Any other group Caribbean African

0% Pakistani/Bangladeshi20% White40% European 60%White UK 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African

Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Chart 36 Would you say your general travel patterns have changed in the Chart 36 last two years

Chart 36 Indian 73% 18% 9%

Any other groupIndian 58% 73% 32% 18% 11%9%

Any Caribbeanother group 48% 58% 33% 32% 18% 11%

CaribbeanAfrican 48%59% 33%18% 22%18%

Pakistani/BangladeshiAfrican 55%59% 18%38% 22% 8%

Pakistani/BangladeshiWhite European 56%55% 14% 38% 30% 8%

WhiteWhite European UK 49% 56% 14%33% 30%18%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% White UK 49% 33% 18% Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

7.2.3 Further evidence of theTravel different more travel Travelpatterns less of the IndianTravel by community different mode is shown by car use for different purposes whereby the Indian community is similar to the White UK group and in contrast to other ethnic groups.

Chart 37 Modal choice 46% 23% 35% Chart 37 Car - leisure 39% 34% 23% 46% 23% 43% 35% Chart 37 Car - leisure 39% 34% 51% 23% 35% 33% 43% Car - shopping 39% 33% 35% 51% 35% 55% 33% Car - shopping 39% 33%34% 22% 35% 15% 55% Car – education 26% 21% 34% 22% 41% 15% Car – education 26% 45% 21% 27% 35% 41% Car – work 36% 38% 29% 45% 27% 35% 44% Car – work 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%38% 50% 60% 29% 44% Indian Any other group Caribbean 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European Indian Any other group Caribbean White UK African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European

White UK

Chart57 38

Chart 38

Indian 32% 15% 53%

Indian 32% 15% 53% Any other group 28% 9% 62%

Any other group 28% 9% 62% Caribbean 32% 15% 53%

Caribbean 32% 15% 53% African 37% 14% 50%

African 37% 14% 50% Pakistani/Bangladeshi 34% 16% 50%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 34% 16% 50% White European 34% 10% 56%

White European 34% 10% 56% White UK 15% 14% 71%

White UK0% 15% 20%14% 40% 60% 71% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change

Chart 39

Chart 39

Indian 21% 18% 61%

Indian 21% 18% 61% Any other group 15% 12% 72%

Any other group 15% 12% 72% Caribbean 19% 12% 69%

Caribbean 19% 12% 69% African 26% 15% 59%

African 26% 15% 59% Pakistani/Bangladeshi 26% 13% 61%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 26% 13% 61% White European 10% 13% 77%

White European 10% 13% 77% White UK 8% 11% 80%

White UK0% 8% 11%20% 40% 60%80% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change Chart 35 5% 9% 11% Licence but don't drive 13% 19% 13% 9%

72% 61% 51% Full licence 58% 51% 64% 74%

11% 10% 8% Provisional 9% 13% 4% 4%

12% 20% 31% Non driver 20% 17% 19% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African

Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 36

Indian 73% 18% 9%

Any other group 58% 32% 11%

Caribbean 48% 33% 18%

African 59% 18% 22%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 55% 38% 8%

White European 56% 14% 30%

White UK 49% 33% 18%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode

INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION 46% 23% 35% Chart 37 Car - leisure 39% 34% 23% 43%

51% 35% 33% 7.3 Car - shoppingAspirations of all BAME groups39% 33% 35% 7.3.1 However, the desire to travel more and acquire cars is not unique55% to the Indian 34% community. Many people from22% other BAME groups expressed a similar desire which 15% Car – educationwas often linked to aspirations to earn more money. 26% 21% 7.3.2 Thus in answer to questions about travelling more41% in the future both in general and

for all purposes, BAME groups all expected to travel 45%more than White UK groups. 27% 35% 7.3.3 CarSuch – work aspirational views were also related to36% the need to improve housing situations 38% and the associated locational changes29% were judged likely to increase travel especially 44% for work. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% “It’s getting too expensive round here (Ealing) – we’re too crowded and the children Indian Any other group Caribbean need their own bedrooms. We’re planning to move looking to move out to Milton KeynesAfrican which would mean more Pakistani/Bangladeshitravelling for work and familyWhite butEuropean it’s a trade-off.”

(restaurantWhite owner, UK Chinese, London, male) “We used to live in Slough where my business still is but we always planned to move further out. The schools are better here (Buckingham) and we love the house.” (bus driver, African, 40s, male) 7.3.4 There was anecdotal evidence of van or taxi driving being greater in certain communities (e.g. Pakistani) but the licensing statistics do not record ethnicity. It would be useful if this could be remedied. Chart 38 Chart 38 Thinking about the long term future do you think you will be travelling more or less than you do now for work?

Indian 32% 15% 53%

Any other group 28% 9% 62%

Caribbean 32% 15% 53%

African 37% 14% 50%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 34% 16% 50%

White European 34% 10% 56%

White UK 15% 14% 71%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change

58

Chart 39

Indian 21% 18% 61%

Any other group 15% 12% 72%

Caribbean 19% 12% 69%

African 26% 15% 59%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 26% 13% 61%

White European 10% 13% 77%

White UK 8% 11% 80%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change Chart 35 5% 9% 11% Licence but don't drive 13% 19% 13% 9%

72% 61% 51% Full licence 58% 51% 64% 74%

11% 10% 8% Provisional 9% 13% 4% 4%

12% 20% 31% Non driver 20% 17% 19% 14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African

Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 36

Indian 73% 18% 9%

Any other group 58% 32% 11%

Caribbean 48% 33% 18%

African 59% 18% 22%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 55% 38% 8%

White European 56% 14% 30%

White UK 49% 33% 18%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Travel more Travel less Travel by different mode

46% 23% 35% Chart 37 Car - leisure 39% 34% 23% 43%

51% 35% 33% Car - shopping 39% 33% 35% 55%

34% 22% 15% Car – education 26% 21% 41%

45% 27% 35% Car – work 36% 38% 29% 44%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Indian Any other group Caribbean

African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European

White UK

Chart 38

Indian 32% 15% 53%

Any other group 28% 9% 62%

Caribbean 32% 15% 53%

African 37% 14% 50%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 34% 16% 50%

White European 34% 10% 56%

White UK 15% 14% 71%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

7.3.5 Shopping trips were also judged likely to increase since there would still be a need to Chart 39 return to areas with specialist shopping facilities. Chart 39 Thinking about the long term future do you think you will be travelling more or less than you do now for shopping?

Indian 21% 18% 61%

Any other group 15% 12% 72%

Caribbean 19% 12% 69%

African 26% 15% 59%

Pakistani/Bangladeshi 26% 13% 61%

White European 10% 13% 77%

White UK 8% 11% 80%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel more Travel less No change

7.3.6 For many BAME groups this desire to travel more was strongly linked to the desire for a car. “My dream is to get a nice car to take the family to church – it’s a nightmare going on the bus on Sundays especially as the bus lanes aren’t in action. You don’t want to be stuck on the bus with your best clothes on for hours.” (Barber, age 40s, Afro Caribbean, London, male) “In our community we don’t want to go back to riding bikes unless we have to.” (unwaged, Pakistani, female) 7.3.7 Similarly when asked about car purchase plans in future BAME groups were more likely to say they did plan to buy one and were also more likely to say that such a purchase was a priority.

59 Chart 40 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

19% 29% 15% Maybe 29% 26% Chart 40 Chart 40 Do you expect26% to have a new car in the coming year or so? 7%

19% 50% 29% 60% 15% 63% MaybeNo 29% 44% 26% 62% 26% 52% 7% 88%

31% 50% 10% 60% 22% 63% YesNo 27% 44% 12% 62% 22% 52% 5% 88%

0% 20% 31% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian10% Any other group Caribbean African 22% Yes Pakistani/Bangladeshi27% White European White UK 12% 22% 5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 41 Chart 41 Is a new car a priority?

30% 0% 25% Maybe 29% 15% Chart 41 32% 0%

10% 30% 0% 40% 25% 44% MaybeNo 29% 42% 15% 38% 27% 32% 0% 71%

10% 60% 40% 60% 31% 44% YesNo 29% 42% 38% 46% 27% 41% 29% 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%60% 70% 80% 60% Indian Any31% other group Caribbean African Yes Pakistani/Bangladeshi White29% European White UK 46% 41% 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

60

Chart 42

White 20% 13% 66%

Chart 42 BAME 32% 14% 54%

BusinessWhite 20% 32% 13% 11% 66%61%

Non migrantsBAME 32%29% 14%11% 50%54%

BusinessMigrants 32%32% 11% 13% 61%50%

Non migrantsAge 55+ 22%29% 20% 11% 58%50%

MigrantsUnder 55 32%36% 13%12% 50%52%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 22% 20% 58% Age 55+ Travel More Travel Less No change

Under 55 36% 12% 52%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change

Chart 43

White 20% 16% 64%

Chart 43

BAME 37% 13% 50%

BusinessWhite 20% 36% 16% 10% 64% 55%

Non migrantsBAME 25% 37% 12% 13% 62% 50%

BusinessMigrants 24% 36% 19% 10% 57%55%

Non migrantsAge 55+ 23%25% 12%16% 62%61%

MigrantsUnder 55 24% 37% 19% 10% 57%53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Age 55+ 23% Travel More16% Travel Less 61% No change

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change

Chart 44

White 6%

BAME 7%

Chart 44 Business 11%

White 6% Non migrants 7%

BAME 7% Migrants 9%

Business 11% Age 55+ 7%

Non migrants 7% Under 55 9%

Migrants0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 9% 10% 12%

Age 55+ 7%

Under 55 9%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

7.4 Other modes of travel

Buses and Coach 7.4.1 Although less pronounced that walking, BAME groups (Indians excepted) also had higher rates of bus and coach travel. The two modes were not distinguished in the hard data but discussions suggest that there are distinct patterns and routes of coach travel for particular migrant groups particularly for shopping, religion and family visits. These routes are to some extent ‘under the radar’ and not depicted in national timetables although some such as those by the New Bharat company are operated under the aegis of National Express and are a feature of most urban areas with significant ethnic minorities.10 “We go to Southall with Thandi coaches (from Leicester) at least once a month for shopping.” (community worker, Pakistani, Birmingham, female) “I use the coach from Wolverhampton to the Temple at Smethwick.” (factory worker, Pakistani, male)

Train 7.4.2 Train travel was a relative mystery to many of the minority ethnic groups in our research especially for longer distance trips. The general view was that it was very expensive and there was little knowledge of advanced fares or travel card concessions. The exception were students, higher status business travellers or commuters but they too often expressed preferences for switching to car. 7.5 Conclusion

7.5.1 There are clear differences in attitudes and patterns of travel between ethnic groups with some having more in common with the white UK group than other BAME groups a factor related to both socio economic status and to a lesser extent specific cultures. 7.5.2 Family size is another influential factor with the cost of travel by public transport for larger families varying by area depending on fare structures and sometimes indicating car ownership as more cost effective. 7.5.3 Nevertheless BAME groups in general have stronger aspirations to car ownership and less inclination to use other modes especially bus and cycling. Even train is considered less often since once a car is acquired this tends to be the default method both for reasons of status and the economics of travelling with larger family groups. 7.5.4 Aspirations also lead to plans to move away from the inner city but still to return for shopping and to a lesser extent work. However moving out is also related to the push factor of rising housing costs in central urban areas especially London.

10 For example the Chinatown intercity coach company ‘Chinatown’ in USA Journal of Cambridge Studies Volume 8, No. 1 36 “The Growth of Chinatown Bus: Beyond Ethnic Enclave Economy in America LONG D &a HAN Qiming 61 http://journal.acs-cam.org.uk/data/archive/2013/201301-article3.pdf On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

8. Reflections on the Results

8.1 Wider discussions

8.1.1 A number of themes have emerged from the overall results of the ‘On the Move’ study – not just from the direct research itself but as a result of discussions with professional colleagues at conferences and workshops throughout the two years of the project. The themes below are a summary of the key conversations in the light of the research results. 8.2 Car ownership versus use

8.2.1 There is a clear decline in the role of the car as a status symbol especially by particular demographic and social groups such as young people, professional urban residents and older people. 8.2.2 This trend is exacerbated by the increase in urban living whereby public transport is plentiful and prioritised over cars so it is increasingly difficult and not very ‘cool’ to demonstrate status via car ownership. 8.2.3 Another factor in explaining different patterns of travel is the increased availability of new types of offer and what has been called ‘the sharing economy’ enabled by the Facebook model and as shown by Airbnb whereby people rent out rooms. In transport, these include leasing, car clubs, car sharing, lift giving and demand responsive taxi services. All these arrangements are becoming more common and even offered as packages by car manufacturers and rental firms – for example GM Ventures, the investment arm of America’s biggest carmaker, was among the investors who put $13m into RelayRides in 2011. Similarly, ZipCar, a pay-by-the- hour car-rental firm that maintains its own fleet of vehicles, led a $14m investment in Wheelz, a peer-rental firm, in 2012. ZipCar was in turn acquired by Avis, a conventional car-rental firm, in January 2013 for $491m, giving Avis a stake in Wheelz. And so it goes on11. In the future self driving vehicles will be added to this menu. Once people have a choice of such services the tendency is to care less about the status of any particular car and simply base choice on functionality. 8.3 New patterns of shopping

8.3.1 Much has been written about home deliveries and our research suggests that people are also increasingly receiving personal deliveries at their place of work12. This in turn is leading to interest in hubs at key points especially at stations which in turn is encouraging travel by public transport. The rise of ‘metro style’ outlets for the major supermarkets is also significant in enabling people to carry smaller loads which don’t require a car. As one director of a major food retailer told us “most of our customers used to be trolley cases and now they’re mainly basket cases”.

11 http://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21572914-collaborative-consumption-technology-makes-it- easier-people-rent-items 12 TfL research for the run-up to the London Olympics estimated that 55% of deliveries to offices were personal : Skadden “London 2012 Olympics Planning” (2011) 62 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

8.4 The role of technology

8.4.1 There is no doubt that technology is affecting work patterns and that there is a clear trend towards less division between work carried out in offices or other work locations and work at home or whilst travelling. The increase in the use of long distance rail for business travel is a clear indication and the debate about the value of time in this context is well known. However, this doesn’t imply that the car is a deterrent. Our research has shown that people also use their cars for working either by phone whilst travelling or parking in places with good signals to make confidential calls or work on lap tops. There are interesting implications for designers of both trains and cars in this context. 8.4.2 On a broader basis the availability of GPS and real time information is influencing modal choice as with the teenagers and young people in our research who preferred to communicate via their smart phones on a continuous basis and not take the time out which would be required when driving. 8.4.3 Technology also led to greater perceptions of personal security when travelling by public transport supported by the role of real time travel information and satellite location of individuals. This was especially valued by parents in allowing independent travel for teenagers or for others concerned about vulnerable older travellers. 8.4.4 Another implication of transport related technology is that the boundaries between the information provided by travellers and travel movements and wider business will merge. It has even been suggested by foresight work such as the Future Agenda project that cars or travel costs could be provided free in return for the information thus gained.13

13 https://www.flickr.com/photos/131046472@N07/sets/72157650615072522 63 http://www.slideshare.net/futureagenda2/40-issues-for-the-next-decade-insights-to-date-16-05-15 Chart 40

19% 29% 15% Maybe 29% 26% 26% 7%

50% 60% 63% No 44% 62% 52% 88%

31% 10% 22% Yes 27% 12% 22% 5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 41

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION 30% 0% 25% Maybe 29% 15% 32% 9. Conclusion 0% 10% 40% 44% No 42% 38% 27% 9.1 A strong desire to travel more 71% 60% 9.1.1 One of the early questions in the interviews with all demographic groups was about 60% 31% whether people felt they had travelled moreYes or less in the past two years and29% what 46% they expected to do in the next two years. It was clear from the answers that most 41% people interpreted this as all trips ranging from air travel to walking to local29% shops and

by all modes. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

9.1.2 The results show that in all groups there were greaterIndian proportions judgingAny they other had group Caribbean African travelled more in the past two years than thought theyPakistani/Bangladeshi had travelled less White (chart European 42 White UK below). In addition higher proportions thought they would travel more in the future than expected to travel less although the largest proportion in both groups expected no change (chart 43 overleaf). The need to travel further for work and aspirations to travel more for leisure were the most common reasons given for travelling more. This may not equate with currently published NTS data based on the actual trips of a representative sample of the whole population. However, it does tell us a lot about people’s perceptions and aspirations. Some have suggested that the desire to travel is an inherent human need and indeed this is an issue pursued by another ITC initiative “Why Travel” .

Chart 42 Chart 42 Travel more or less in the past two years

White 20% 13% 66%

BAME 32% 14% 54%

Business 32% 11% 61%

Non migrants 29% 11% 50%

Migrants 32% 13% 50%

Age 55+ 22% 20% 58%

Under 55 36% 12% 52%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change

14 http://whytravel.org/about-us/ 64

Chart 43

White 20% 16% 64%

BAME 37% 13% 50%

Business 36% 10% 55%

Non migrants 25% 12% 62%

Migrants 24% 19% 57%

Age 55+ 23% 16% 61%

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change

Chart 44

White 6%

BAME 7%

Business 11%

Non migrants 7%

Migrants 9%

Age 55+ 7%

Under 55 9%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Chart 40

19% 29% 15% Maybe 29% 26% 26% 7%

50% 60% 63% No 44% 62% 52% 88%

31% 10% 22% Yes 27% 12% 22% 5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 41

30% 0% 25% Maybe 29% 15% 32% 0%

10% 40% 44% No 42% 38% 27% 71%

60% 60% 31% Yes 29% 46% 41% 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 42

White 20% 13% 66%

BAME 32% 14% 54%

Business 32% 11% 61%

Non migrants 29% 11% 50%

Migrants 32% 13% 50%

Age 55+ 22% 20% 58%

Under 55 36% 12% 52%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change

On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Chart 43

Chart 43 Travel more or less in the future

White 20% 16% 64%

BAME 37% 13% 50%

Business 36% 10% 55%

Non migrants 25% 12% 62%

Migrants 24% 19% 57%

Age 55+ 23% 16% 61%

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change 9.2 Changes in attitude to modal choice

9.2.1 However, the desire to travel more does not imply an automatic increase in car trips. The attitudinal work and to some extent the statistical analysis shows that people are choosing a wider range of modes and of those who reported travel change in the past two years many identified changes in their use of mode (see chart 44 Chart 44 below). It is clear that the days when people just leapt into their cars without thinking about alternativesWhite are diminishing and this is supported6% by growing knowledge amongst the population of the public transport ‘offer’ including routes, reduced or 7% concessionaryBAME fares and time savings. Triggers for this trend include growth in the urban population especially university students at one end of the age group and Business 11% concessionary fares at the other. Other factors are improvements in public transport

includingNon faster, migrants improved design, better customer service7% (of course with some exceptions) and not to be underestimated the influence of changing consumer values. In addition theMigrants numerous policy initiatives (both ‘push’ and ‘pull’) by9% Government and local authorities to encourage sustainable travel have had a positive effect. The result isAge that 55+ even when households have access to a7% car, other modes may be preferred although as the results in the full report show this varies between different 9% demographicUnder groups. 55 This move away from unimodal to varimodal patterns of travel is significant and has0% knock on2% effects such4% as downsizing6% from8% two cars10% to one car12% per household.

65 Chart 40

19% 29% 15% Maybe 29% 26% 26% 7%

50% 60% 63% No 44% 62% 52% 88%

31% 10% 22% Yes 27% 12% 22% 5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 41

30% 0% 25% Maybe 29% 15% 32% 0%

10% 40% 44% No 42% 38% 27% 71%

60% 60% 31% Yes 29% 46% 41% 29%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Indian Any other group Caribbean African Pakistani/Bangladeshi White European White UK

Chart 42

White 20% 13% 66%

BAME 32% 14% 54%

Business 32% 11% 61%

Non migrants 29% 11% 50%

Migrants 32% 13% 50%

Age 55+ 22% 20% 58%

Under 55 36% 12% 52%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change

Chart 43

White 20% 16% 64%

BAME 37% 13% 50%

Business 36% 10% 55%

Non migrants 25% 12% 62%

Migrants 24% 19% 57%

Age 55+ 23% 16% 61%

Under 55 37% 10% 53%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Travel More Travel Less No change INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Chart 44 Change of travel mode in the last two years Chart 44

White 6%

BAME 7%

Business 11%

Non migrants 7%

Migrants 9%

Age 55+ 7%

Under 55 9%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

9.2.2 The second and related change in attitude is that the concept of ‘main mode’ of travel choice for a particular trip is increasingly inappropriate. The trend is to split journeys into stages using different modes – for example cycle/walk/train or car/coach. Yet official travel statistics and policy perspectives would tend to define the trip via the ‘main mode’ as the greater distance and cost. But in terms of public perception, time or even pleasure may drive the choice ‘pallette’. The implication is that new sorts of information systems are needed to inform and influence such choices. Yet currently travel apps are designed to focus on the choice of one mode even though it is technically possible to combine separate information systems on a customised basis so there is a real business opportunity here to support this growing varimodal inclination. 9.2.3 But this narrative is not to imply that all demographic groups will exhibit the same level or direction of travel change. The detailed results show considerable differences by socio economic group, residential location and within migrant and ethnic communities. There are different scales of implication for transport modelling depending on the future sizes of these different population groups and this will be the focus of the final stage of the ITC research. As things stand the DfT’s national traffic forecasts show growth in road traffic volumes in England by between 19 and 55% between 2010 and 2040, but this is accompanied by a welcome new scenario based methodology which implies the flexibility to address change and diversity between demographic groups15.

15 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/road-traffic-forecasts-2015 66 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

9.3 Young people

9.3.1 The vast majority of young people cite cost factors as the main reason why young people are driving less. But this is not the whole story since even those who did own cars often prefer to travel by public transport, walking or cycling (41% of all short trips and 27% of long trips). There is also a growing number of young people who say they don’t ever want a car and this increases with age. Thus 15% of non-car owners aged 17-29 year olds don’t want a car in the future compared to twice as many (32%) of non-car owners aged 30-42. 9.3.2 Much as to what happens will depend on wider policy decisions about the cost of housing and the location of development in the future but we can say with confidence that the current generation of 20 year olds and indeed also many in their 30s are unlikely to resort to the levels of car ownership or certainly car use of previous generations. Young people today have learnt about how to use the public transport system and now make travel choices based on a range of modes and models. 9.4 Older people

9.4.1 The overall finding from the research is that older people are receptive to change driven by the desire to retain their mobility. As with young people, older people are using a wider range of modes and are less likely to rely on cars even when they own one. This change is in part due to the availability of concessionary fares or free travel and many older people are choosing to move to places which provide good public transport links to safeguard their mobility should they or their partner be unable to drive. Others are planning ahead in other ways for this purpose and are in the market for all sorts of solutions involving new types of vehicle design and other accessibility enhancing options including the greater use of technology. 9.5 Commuters and business travellers

9.5.1 Commuting distances are growing driven by the need to access cheaper housing and other factors such as dual career families and school allocations. It might be assumed that this would lead to higher rates of home working since for many professional occupations the work place is enabling working at different times at home, in coffee bars, local hubs, in their cars, on public transport and whilst walking. These trends are increasingly enabled by technology. However, it seems there is a long way to go to fully support this trend including in relation to employer attitudes, fares structures, vehicle design, planning and housing policy. 9.5.2 Apart from commuting, there is also undoubtedly some travel substitution for business travel by methods such as video conferencing, Skype and so on but this does not seem to result in less travel overall – rather it leads to wider networking and there is still a strong desire for face to face meetings. The ability to work whilst travelling for business is a key explanation for modal choice with facilities on trains and planes much discussed. An interesting finding was a growing tendency to use cars as mobile offices on grounds of convenience and privacy and some ingenious adaptations such as fold down desks and other equipment were described.

67 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

9.6 Migrants

9.6.1 Both the country of origin and the planned length of stay in the UK affect car ownership rates. Other effects stem from migrants being disproportionately engaged in lower paid jobs, more likely to spend on air travel and also more likely to live in urban areas – often in cultural and country of origin clusters. These factors led to distinct travel with relatively low rates of car ownership and much higher rates of walking. 9.6.2 Nevertheless, some migrants needed a car (or often a van) for work and here there was a tendency to car share especially by East European migrants where the norm in their home countries was to insure the vehicle rather than the individual driver. 9.7 Black, Asian and ethnic minority groups

9.7.1 As with migrants, there are clear differences in attitudes and patterns of travel between ethnic groups with some having more in common with the white UK group than other BAME groups a factor related to both socio economic status and to a lesser extent specific cultures. The results show the Indian Sikh and Hindu communities as an example of high commitment to car ownership with 60% of this group judging a new car to be a priority compared to only 29% of Africans. In comparison, there is less inclination to cycle which some see as a sign of low status. 9.7.2 In addition, aspirations lead to plans to move away from the inner city but still to return for shopping, religious venues and to a lesser extent work. This results in a network of cross city or cross country routes – the latter often provided by specialist coach services.

68 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

9.8 Overall

9.8.1 The research has shown major differences in travel between the groups studied although with urban/suburban/rural and socio economic differences frequently proving the most influential variable. As the proportion of the total population living in urban areas increases, both car ownership and car use is bound to decline. 9.8.2 Some groups are exhibiting bigger changes in attitude to car ownership than others especially young people but all groups are acquiring knowledge of public transport systems and are increasingly unlikely to see car as the automatic default choice. This in turn is breaking the link between car use and car ownership and reducing the status of cars as statement consumer goods. 9.8.3 Technology is enabling more diverse work travel patterns and affecting both commuting and business travel. A reduction in either commuting or business travel through working at home does not automatically lead to a reduction in total travel since many people still make trips for other purposes during the time gained. 9.8.4 The cumulative picture to emerge from the results of this ‘On the Move’ research is very convincing in terms of showing public support for moving towards more sustainable patterns of travel. This is not indicative of less travel and indeed with population growth and personal motivations16 there will be more demand. Rather the results give a strong indication of trends towards a wider range of modal choices and lower rates of trip per person by car17 as well as more variation of times and patterns of travel. This overarching finding has important implications for the National Transport Model as well as wider implications for economic growth and environmental policies. It is also to be welcomed that the new DfT road traffic forecasts presented via a range of scenarios will be a useful tool for the discussion. 9.8.5 These changes will continue and indeed are being observed in other developed economies and the good news from the research is that there are many opportunities for policy initiatives and technological development to facilitate this direction which the public will expect and support. A key role for Government is to support these trends including by tackling the legislative and policy obstacles and resisting unrepresentative pressure from lobby groups. 9.8.6 Overall, the ITC hopes that there will now be a debate about what should be done to ensure that the UK takes a lead to capture the implicit technological, environmental and economic opportunities stemming from this research.

16 This motivation is supported another of the ITC’s research projects which addresses the broader question of “Why Travel?” from the perspective of different academic and philosophical disciplines www.whytravel.org 17 As even Jeremy Clarkson has written “Today’s generation sees the car … in a jam, on a wet Tuesday --- with a broken 69 TomTom on the passenger seat. (Sunday Times: Driving, 17th May 2015 p. 9) On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Appendices

Appendices covering the following information will be published online by the sponsors: Appendix A Interview and Questionnaire Schedules Appendix B Data and Literature Review Appendix C Discussion Group Summaries Appendix D Statistical Results These can be viewed online at www.theitc.org.uk

70 On the Move: Exploring attitudes to road and rail travel in Britain

Research Team profile

Social Research Associates (led by Kris Beuret OBE) is a social enterprise organisation specialising in research and consultancy about social aspects of planning, social policy and transport. The company places particular emphasis on the understanding of attitudes and perceptions that can be as influential on behaviour as ‘objective reality’. This approach has been used to help develop policy in areas as diverse as health, childcare, road safety, crime and housing policy. SRA also carry out socio-economic analysis, training, equality audits and policy evaluation. For more information, contact: Social Research Associates Ltd Tel: 0116 285 8604 www.sraltd.co.uk

71 INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT COMMISSION

Independent Transport Commission

Office of Rail and Road

July 2015

For further information and electronic copies please visit:

www.theitc.org.uk

or write to:

The Independent Transport Commission

70 Cowcross Street

London

EC1M 6EJ

72 This report has been commissioned by: The Independent Transport Commission (ITC) is one of Britain’s leading research charities with a mission to explore all aspects of transport and land use policy. Through our independent research work and educational events we aim to improve and better inform public policy making. For more information on our current research and activities please see our website www.theitc.org.uk The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is the independent economic and safety regulator for Britain’s railways and the independent monitor of Highways England. We regulate the rail industry’s health and safety performance, we hold Network Rail and High Speed 1 (HS1) to account and we make sure that the rail industry is competitive and fair. From 1 April 2015 we have taken on responsibility for monitoring and enforcing the performance and efficiency of Highways England. For more information visit www.orr.gov.uk

Independent Transport Commission 70 Cowcross Street London EC1M 6EJ Tel No: 0207 253 5510 www.theitc.org.uk Registered Charity No. 1080134 July 2015 © Copyright Independent Transport Commission £15 reachmarketing.co.uk 23376 07/15 reachmarketing.co.uk