Renter Protections Ordinance Public Comment Combined 0828
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2012 ADC Executive Summary
22001122 CCEDARRRIVERSIDE CCOMMUNITY SSPACE SSTUDY FFINAL RREPORT Cedar‐Riverside Community Space Study – September 2012 ADC Executive Summary The Cedar Riverside neighborhood is home to over 7,000 residents and numerous organizations that need space for meeting, gathering, performing, educational, social service, and other types of activities. Often times, the demand for space is greater than the supply in this densely populated neighborhood. In order to determine the community spaces available and types of community spaces most needed in the neighborhood, the African Development Center (ADC) conducted a community space study, with financial support from the Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program. After extensive outreach and information gathering, the ADC found that the Cedar Riverside neighborhood is sometimes lacking in both knowledge of and access to currently available community spaces. In order to increase the level of awareness of available space in the Cedar Riverside neighborhood, ADC has created a Space Inventory document, which can be found here as an appendix, as well as on ADC’s website. The space inventory provides information regarding specific locations and rental terms of available space in Cedar Riverside. ADC expects that this inventory will help community members to better utilize space currently available in the neighborhood. Despite the fact that several neighborhood organizations are willing to open their doors for community use, there is still a major need for more spaces. Neighborhood representatives reported that the greatest desires are: community spaces for youth recreation and related services, fitness/exercise activities, adult/elder activities, large events/gatherings and social services. Despite many creative and cooperative approaches occurring to meet space needs among organizations large and small, there are still significant unmet needs. -
Directory Washington Ave S Hotels Office Buildings Residential Buildings
THE GATEWAY Directory Washington Ave S Hotels Office Buildings Residential Buildings e S v CANCER SURVIVORS AC Hotel Minneapolis ...............................4W The 15 Building .........................................5W 1200 On the Mall .....................................12W PARK DoubleTree Suites ..................................11W 33 South Sixth Street / City Center ..........6W 1225 LaSalle ............................................12W Embassy Suites ........................................5W 50 South Tenth ..........................................9W 365 Nicollet ................................................3E 2W 2E Hyatt Regency ........................................13W 510 Marquette ...........................................5E 4MARQ .......................................................4E Four Seasons The Marquette Hotel .................................7E 7th & Nic .....................................................6E City Club Apartments ..............................10E Marquette Hennepin A (2022) Marriott City Center .................................6W 88 South Tenth Street ................................9E Continental Apartments ........................11W Plaza Millennium Minneapolis ..........................13E The Andrus ...............................................5W Marquette Place Apartments .................13E Radisson Blu .............................................7W Centerpoint Energy ...................................5E The Metro Apartments ..............................8E 3rd St S Residence -
INTELSAT SA, Et Al.1 Debto
Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 1697 Filed 03/19/21 Entered 03/19/21 16:03:44 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 150 IN the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT of VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., et al.1 ) Case No. 20-32299 (KLP) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) AFFIDAVIT of SERVICE I, Victoria X. Tran, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On February 26, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following document to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B: • Notice of Motions and Notice of Hearing (Docket No. 1470) Furthermore, on March 11, 2021, at my direction under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following document to be served via first-class mail on Jean Alex Hippolyte at a redacted address: • Notice of Motions and Notice of Hearing (Docket No. 1470) Furthermore, on March 11, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit C: • Notice of Adjourned Hearing on Disclosure Statement and Motion to Approve Exclusivity (Docket No. 1570) Furthermore, on March 12, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following document to be served via overnight mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit D, via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit E and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B: • Notice of Adjourned Hearing on Disclosure Statement and Motion to Approve Exclusivity (Docket No. -
U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report
Moving Forward Together: U of M Minneapolis Area Neighborhood Impact Report Appendices 1 2 Table of Contents Appendix 1: CEDAR RIVERSIDE: Neighborhood Profi le .....................5 Appendix 15: Maps: U of M Faculty and Staff Living in University Appendix 2: MARCY-HOLMES: Neighborhood Profi le .........................7 Neighborhoods .......................................................................27 Appendix 3: PROSPECT PARK: Neighborhood Profi le ..........................9 Appendix 16: Maps: U of M Twin Cities Campus Laborshed ....................28 Appendix 4: SOUTHEAST COMO: Neighborhood Profi le ...................11 Appendix 17: Maps: Residential Parcel Designation ...................................29 Appendix 5: UNIVERSITY DISTRICT: Neighborhood Profi le ......... 13 Appendix 18: Federal Facilities Impact Model ........................................... 30 Appendix 6: Map: U of M neighborhood business district ....................... 15 Appendix 19: Crime Data .............................................................................. 31 Appendix 7: Commercial District Profi le: Stadium Village .....................16 Appendix 20: Examples and Best Practices ..................................................32 Appendix 8: Commercial District Profi le: Dinkytown .............................18 Appendix 21: Examples of Prior Planning and Development Appendix 9: Commercial District Profi le: Cedar Riverside .................... 20 Collaboratives in the District ................................................38 Appendix 10: Residential -
Improvin G Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies
NPCR 1053 Improvin_g Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies A CONSORTIUM PROJECT OF: Augsburg College; College of St. Catherine; Hamline University; Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs; Macalester College; Metropolitan State University; Minneapolis Community College; Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program; University of Minnesota (Center for Urban and Regional Affairs; Children, Youth and Family Consortium; Minnesota Extension Service); University of St. Thomas; and Minneapolis community and neighborhood representatives. CURA RESOURCE COLLECTION Center for Urban and Regional Affairs University of Minnesota 330 Humphrey Center Improving Water Quality in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes and Minnehaha Creek: Stakeholders and Potential Strategies Report prepared for the Lynnhurst Neighborhood Natural Environment Committee Andrzej Kozlowski Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota February, 1997 -==:. February, 1997 Neighborhood Planning for Community Revitalization (NPCR) supported the work of the author of this report but has not reviewed it for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and is not necessarily endorsed by NPCR. NPCR is coordinated by the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota and is funded in part by an Urban Community Service Program grant administered by the U.S. Department of Education. NPCR 330 lilI Center 301 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 phone: 612/625-1020 e-mail: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................................................3 II. The major stakeholders ...................................................................3 III. Preliminary list of potential strategies for improving water quality ................ 16 IV. Summary: discussion of partnerships and areas of future exploration ..............20 V. -
CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 P.M
CEDAR-ISLES-DEAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Annual Members Meeting Minutes, May 12, 7-8:30 p.m. Online via Zoom Minutes by Rosanne Halloran Board members present: Chair Mary Pattock, Vice Chair Tim Sheridan, Secretary Rosanne Halloran, Dean Kephart, Claire Ruebeck, Amanda Vallone and CIDNA Coordinator Michael Jon Olson. Absent: Evan Carlson, Stephen Goltry, Treasurer Kevin Johnson Invited guests: Lisa Goodman / Minneapolis City Council Member - Ward 7, Marion Greene / Hennepin County Commissioner - District 3, and CIDNA accountant Robert Thompson. About 25 community members were also present. Call to order: Mary Pattock, Chair • Mary called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. The board approved the meeting agenda and the April 14, 2021 meeting minutes. Mary welcomed attendees and invited them to consider running for board membership later in the meeting. • She welcomed CIDNA’s new coordinator, Michael Jon Olson, who comes to CIDNA with extensive neighborhood organization experience and management skills. He reviewed the Zoom meeting protocols with attendees. Financial Report / Robert Thompson, CIDNA Accountant Robert said CIDNA is financially healthy. In addition to ongoing City funding, we have access to $18,000 previously contracted but unspent, which must be spent by the end of December. Our loan to Propel for affordable housing was paid back; those $134K Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) dollars can be used again for housing or other projects allowable under NRP legislation. Annual Report / Mary Pattock, Chair • CIDNA made substantial progress in community engagement this year, due in part to Communication Committee activities, including the “Take a Look at CIDNA” Facebook project, and the neighborhood survey, which has nearly 200 responses so far. -
03 Prospect Park
NPS Form 10-900-a (Rev. 8/2002) OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5-31-2012) United States Department of the Interior Prospect Park ResidentialPut Here Historic District National Park Service Name of Property Hennepin County, MN County and State National Register of Historic Places N/A Continuation Sheet Name of multiple listing (if applicable) Section number 8 Page 1 NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE The civil engineers who laid out the Prospect Park plats, Samuel Harlan Baker and Joseph H. Gilmore, were influenced by the work of their contemporary, Horace William Shaler (H. W. S.) Cleveland, and the picturesque landscape designs that are a hallmark of the era. Upon the framework of these plats, the residents shaped Prospect Park’s character and appearance. The neighborhood is significant as the home of the first community association in the city of Minneapolis, the Prospect Park Improvement Association (PPIA). The PPIA quickly established itself as a major influence, effecting changes ranging from the removal of weeds to the construction of the neighborhood’s iconic water tower. The community’s culture was enriched by its proximity to the University of Minnesota, which drew many academics to Prospect Park. The Prospect Park Historic District is one of three suburban-type developments that were established in Minneapolis in the late nineteenth century. While the architectural design in the other two, Kenwood and Washburn Park, is relatively homogeneous, following the pattern of many of the city’s neighborhoods, the houses in Prospect Park display a spectrum of the residential styles that appeared in Minneapolis during the late nineteenth century and the twentieth century. -
Public Comment Phillips South Powderhorn and 35Th St E Street
Date: February 2,2021 Property ID: 02-028-24-12-0110 Address: 3027 14th avenue south, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Owner name & Taxpayer of above address: Brenda Short Dear Mayor Frey, Transportation and Public Works committee, and Minneapolis City Council: I am writing to you to object to the above resurfacing project. By allowing this project during a time of morning of four men and one 18-year-old woman who lost their live on these same streets you are trying to cover. As a Mother of four children, I am very disappointed on how the city of Minneapolis, has handled a lot of issues in the Year 2020. This being said ,I do not believe that this is not the correct time morally or financially for this work to be done. Many homeowners like myself had to take fewer hours at work or was asked to take furloughs, or just lost their job. On top of the financial stress due to cov-19. Homeowners is still dealing with the emotional stress that the city of Minneapolis and city council has forced upon them. Shortly after the George Floyd riot many homeowners like myself found out about families in need at our local parks. Is stead of getting help for these people from the city or mayor or Hennepin county. Homeowners and volunteers were force into unpaid roles as, social workers, and financial assistant workers. we tried to help the people unfortunate during a time of need. The city and law enforcement abused them and destroyed the little property and dignity these people have. -
Ballot Question Regarding a Proposed Amendment to the Minneapolis City Charter, for The
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: CIVIL – OTHER Yes 4 Minneapolis, Court File No. _________________ Petitioner, PETITION TO CORRECT BALLOT v. UNDER MINN. STAT. § 204B.44 City of Minneapolis and Casey Joe Carl, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of Minneapolis, Respondents. The Petitioner Yes 4 Minneapolis, through its counsel, brings this Petition under Minn. Stat. § 204B.44 (Errors or Omissions) to correct the errors, omissions, and wrongful acts of Respondents City of Minneapolis (the “City”) and Casey Joe Carl, in his official capacity as City Clerk and chief election official of the City of Minneapolis (“Mr. Carl” or “City Clerk”). INTRODUCTION On July 23, 2021, the Minneapolis City Council unlawfully added an “Explanatory Note” to a ballot question regarding a proposed amendment to the Minneapolis City Charter, for the City’s November 2, 2021 general election. If passed, the amendment would establish a Department of Public Safety. The “Explanatory Note” should be stricken from the ballot because it is not authorized by law and is also a misleading partial description of the impact of the proposed amendment. 30416.0001 – 5333203.1 To be clear, this Petition does not address the merits of the ballot question itself, but challenges the addition of the “Explanatory Note.” The ballot question fully and fairly explains the proposed amendment’s “essential purpose.”1 The City Council exceeded its power by adding its own subjective version of what will happen if the amendment passes. For proposed charter amendments, Minnesota law authorizes that a ballot question include only a description “sufficient to identify the amendment clearly and to distinguish the question from every other question on the ballot at the same time.” Minn. -
Charter Commission
Council President Lisa Bender 350 S. Fifth St. – Room 307 Minneapolis, MN 55415 TEL 612.673.2204 August 5, 2020 To the Members of the Minneapolis Charter Commission: Thank you for your consideration of the City Council’s proposed charter amendment this past month. Our commitment, as expressed in the resolution passed by the City Council on June 12, 2020, is to transform the way we provide for community safety and respond to decades of failed reforms and deepening mistrust in the Minneapolis Police Department. Our constituents have called for structural change using words like “defund” and “disband” to describe our current, broken system alongside aspirational language like “transform” and “reimagine” as we begin the work toward the system we believe is possible, in which everyone feels safe. As elected representatives in a city demanding systemic change, we are proposing a charter amendment that allows us to meaningfully reimagine our city’s approach to safety. We expect the transformed system to include law enforcement as part of a multi-faceted approach to public safety. As you know, the charter amendment replaces the charter-mandated Police Department with a Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention. It also states that “the Council may maintain a division of protective law enforcement services, composed of licensed Minnesota Peace Officers, subject to the supervision of the department of community safety and violence prevention.” From a governing perspective, there are two reasons why we used the word “may” instead of “shall.” First, it ensures the possibility that the City could choose to contract with another jurisdiction for public safety services if it made sense to do so, as many other towns and cities do. -
Hosting Capacity Analysis and Distribution Grid Data Security (Report)
April 30, 2021 Will Seuffert Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2147 RE: Comments of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources Docket No. E999/CI-20-800, Docket No. E002/M-19-685 Dear Mr. Seuffert: The Minnesota Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources (Department) secured technical consulting services to provide recommendations on privacy and security in Northern States Power Company’s d/b/a Xcel Energy’s next hosting capacity report, as requested by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in the Commission’s July 31, 2020 Order in Docket No. E002/M-19-685. On October 30, 2020, the Commission initiated a Commission Investigation on Grid and Customer Security Issues Related to Public Display or Access to Electric Distribution Grid Data (Commission’s Investigation) in Docket No. E999/CI-20-800 and issued a Notice of Comment Period (Notice). The Department’s consultant, Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. (Synapse), provided a report entitled Hosting Capacity Analysis and Distribution Grid Data Security (Report). The Report offers recommendations on Xcel’s hosting capacity analysis and distribution grid data security, in response to both the Commission’s July 31, 2020 Order and to the Commission’s Notice. Attached to this letter is the Report. Both the Department and Synapse are available to answer any questions that the Commission may have in this matter. Sincerely, /s/ MATTHEW LANDI Rates Analyst ML/ja Attachment 85 7th Place East - Suite 280 - Saint Paul, MN 55101 | P: 651-539-1500 | F: 651-539-1547 mn.gov/commerce An equal opportunity employer Hosting Capacity Analysis and Distribution Grid Data Security (MPUC Docket Nos. -
Buildings & Parking) (Ft²
Total Floor Weather Weather Total GHG ENERGY Source Water Primary Area Site EUI Normalized Normalized Emissions Property Name Address STAR EUI Use Property Type (Buildings & (kBtu/ft²) Site EUI Source EUI (Metric Tons Score (kBtu/ft²) (kgal) Parking) (ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) CO2e) DeLaSalle High School 1 DeLaSalle Dr 84 K-12 School 217,000 63.6 61 95.1 92.5 2790 808 Riverplace - One Main 1 Main Street SE 96 Office 97,551 23.5 23.4 65.1 65.1 449.8 375.9 Other - Twins Ballpark LLC 1 Twins Way N/A Entertainment/ 1,311,792 82.6 82.2 186.4 185.9 16204.4 12251.5 Public Assembly Riverplace - East 10 NE 2nd Street 16 Office 87,703 145.3 139 270 263.5 3501.5 1340.4 Bridge 3405 10 W Lake Street 91 Retail Store 91,805 42.2 40 89.8 86.2 397 474.6 Butler Square 100 6th St North 86 Office 457,678 52.4 51.1 108.4 106.5 2647 2846.9 Fifth Street Towers 100 South 5th Street 85 Office 1,420,153 58.3 56.7 131.5 129.9 4901.3 8921.7 100 Washington 100 Washington Ave 84 Office 770,894 62.6 61 128.3 126.6 6474.6 4720.6 Square S College/ TMH 1000 LaSalle Avenue N/A 165,516 71.1 69.5 141.2 139.3 2088.4 1352.8 University Target Plaza 1000 Nicollet Mall 87 Office 2,042,785 68.7 67.7 127.9 126.6 11990 14098.6 DCI 1001 Minneapolis 1001 3rd Avenue 69 Office 541,542 87.6 86 175.5 173.8 4243.8 4428.7 Venture LLC South Other - St Joseph's Home for 1001 46th St E N/A Lodging/ 123,821 115.4 112.3 176.5 173.2 1306.8 1199.8 Children Residential Hilton Minneapolis 1001 S Marquette 49 Hotel 781,000 122.1 120.9 210.1 208.9 38618.9 9186.1 (MSPMH) Ave Total Floor Weather Weather