DOCSLIB.ORG

Programme Name Youth / Adult Priority Axis Co

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programme Name Youth / Adult Priority Axis Co Participant volumes Co-Financing (indicative) Delivery Programme name Youth / Adult Priority Axis Organisation/ Lead Programme description Brief description of target groups (C = Central, NE = North Budget Delivery organisation Timeframe Partner & East, S = South, W = West) As a whole, people from ethnic minority communities perform less well in the labour market than white people. The latest edition of the Mayor’s Annual Equality Report (from 2012/13) noted that the gap in employment rates between those from Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities was 14 percentage points, and that the gap in median pay between BAME and white group was 24.4%. In particular, women from particular communities have particularly low employment rates and high rates of economic inactivity – C: Hopscotch Asian Women’s Centre for example, 53% of Bangladeshi women of working age were economically inactive (excluding students and Economically inactive (& long term unemployed) Total = 3,084 retired) in the 2011 Census, compared to only 17% of White British women. women from certain BAME communities C = 617 NE: Community Links Trust Ltd Economically inactive BAME March 2016 - Adult employment 1 Big Lottery Fund (Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Arab, Black African, NE = 1,234 £7.4m women This programme will target support at communities which have particularly high levels of female economic December 2019 other Asian excl Indian, Gypsy and Irish S = 462 S: Prevista Ltd inactivity and worklessness. The groups to be targeted are likely to be Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Black African, Traveller) W = 771 Arab, other Asian (excluding Indian women), Gypsy or Irish Traveller women of working age. Key elements of W: Paddington Development Trust the provision might involve outreach to engage inactive women, culturally sensitive information, advice and guidance, referral to ESOL provision, support to access childcare and activities to link participants to the labour market, including voluntary work experience and open days to meet employers. Support may include measures for progress towards work. Older people are a diverse and varied group with multiple issues and needs. Whilst the employment rate for older people is higher than ever before there are some underlying problems; even though unemployment is less common amongst older people than younger people, older people have a higher propensity to be long- NE: Reed in Partnership term unemployed than younger people. As well as being more likely to stay unemployed for longer, older 50+ new JSA claimants who are likely to struggle Total = 6,891 people are more likely to become economically inactive if they become unemployed. C: G4S Government and Outsourcing to find work (e.g. because of low level NE = 2,170 January 2017 - Services (UK) Limited Older people Adult employment 1 DWP qualification), 50+ JSA Work Programme C = 1,953 £10.3m Intervention: The programme will look to address a range of age specific barriers to work faced by older September 2019 returners, 50+ economically inactive/ not S = 1,248 people, including concerns about discrimination, lack of IT skills and awareness of the modern labour market. S: Pinnacle people claiming benefits W = 1,520 Provision should aim to reduce flows from short term unemployment into long term unemployment and inactivity. It should also look to address the more entrenched worklessness experienced by older people who W: Reed in Partnership have returned from the Work Programme and those who are economically inactive. Given the wide range of people that may be supported by this group, a differential payments model may be appropriate. Description: Over recent years there has been a concerted effort to ‘activate’ economically inactive people by changing the conditions of their benefits to push them closer to the labour market and providing additional employment support. One group of economically inactive people, however, has not received additional employment support – carers. In part this recognises that many carers are not able to work, as caring can be a full time role, Nevertheless, there appears to be a sizeable minority of workers who would like to work but are not receiving support. Interventions will primarily target those with substantial caring responsibilities, including Income Support Total = 833 NE & W: Carers Trust and Carers Allowance claimants, who are not in work. The programme will also work with a limited number IS/CA claimants whose caring responsibilities March 2016 - Carers Adult employment 1 Big Lottery Fund NE + W = 500 £2m of those whose caring responsibilities have declined before they become eligible for Work Programme have ended, Workless carers December 2019 S + C = 333 S & C: Carers Trust support. Provision will include outreach, and personal adviser support will be extremely flexible to fit around customers’ caring commitments. Providers will need to have a clear understanding and expertise of the issues faced by carers. The programme should aim to help carers into work (particularly flexible and part time employment in order to fit around caring responsibility and Carers Allowance/Income Support eligibility criteria), but where that is not possible because of caring commitments, the programme should aim to keep carers attached to the labour market so that they find it easier to enter work when their caring commitments reduce. This might involve a focus on training, including employability skills and volunteering. Participant volumes Co-Financing (indicative) Delivery Programme name Youth / Adult Priority Axis Organisation/ Lead Programme description Brief description of target groups (C = Central, NE = North Budget Delivery organisation Timeframe Partner & East, S = South, W = West) The proposed broadening of criteria for the DCLG Troubled Families programme means that it is likely that support for these families will be mainstreamed into early help in most boroughs. The DCLG programme, NE: Serco Limited however, was not designed to provide employment support for all workless families as it was expected that an ESF Families Programme would provide the majority of these outcomes. This programme will provide that Total = 7,948 C: G4S Government and Outsourcing support, building on the experiences of the current DCLG and ESF Families programmes. Unemployed family members on the CLG NE = 2,941 Services (UK) Limited Families Programme only, who are not eligible January 2017 - Troubled Families Adult employment 1 DWP C = 2,305 £14.8m This programme will support parents receiving support through the DCLG Troubled Families programme. The to receive mainstream employment support September 2019 S = 1,033 S: Reed in Partnership ESF programme will tie in closely with the DCLG programme. Interventions will engage employers, families (e.g. the Work Programme). W = 1,669 and local authorities. The programme will look to ensure that some childcare costs are covered whilst W: G4S Government and Outsourcing individuals participate on provision. Mentoring and skills development will be a key part of these Services (UK) Limited interventions supporting families. Total = 3600 This programme will provide employment support to those with common mental health conditions, such as C = 940 depression and anxiety disorders. The precise nature of the programme will vary in different parts of London, NE = 956 Common Mental Health Workless people with common mental health April 2017 - Adult employment 1 Big Lottery Fund reflecting the different employment support offers currently commissioned by Clinical Commissioning S = 592 £9m programmes conditions December 2019 Groups and local authorities in London. The programmes has been co-designed by CCGs and boroughs, led W (IPS) = 712 by borough sub-regional partnerships. W (psycho-education) = 400 Customers should be: For the very hardest to help, it may be necessary in some cases to provide more intensive support to help • only people aged 25+ customers enter and sustain work. One model that has been shown to be highly effective is the intermediate • have a long term health condition or disability labour market (ILM). This provides supported employment for customers, with wages paid by the project, for • not had spells of employment for more than a a short period to provide real work experience which can facilitate customers entering subsequent total of 6 months within the last two years. unsupported employment in the open labour market. Previous programmes, such as DWP’s StepUP, have shown large employment gains. However, given the costs of this type of support, it must be targeted at Targeting should aim to recruit those that have those furthest from entering work. Intermediate Labour two (one being a health condition or disability) Total = 1023 NE & W:Groundwork London Market for adults with or more labour market disadvantages, these are: March 2016 - NE&W = 603 Adult employment 1 Big Lottery Fund Intervention: The provision will provide a temporary job with additional support for those young adults £5.5m disabilities and health • low qualifications (Level 2 and below) or no December 2019 S&C = 420 furthest from the labour market, tailored to meet the needs of the individual client based on an initial S & C: Groundwork London conditions qualifications assessment carried out by the provider on entry onto the programme. Eligible groups will have spent a • BAME groups considerable period out of work, have a long term health condition or disability and suffer at least two other • lone parents major labour market disadvantages, such
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nigel Lawrence [email protected] DWP Central Freedom of Information Team Caxton House 6-12 Tothill Stre
    DWP Central Freedom of Information Team Caxton House 6-12 Tothill Street London SW1H 9NA Nigel Lawrence freedom-of-information- [email protected] [email protected] DWP Website Our Ref: FOI2020/69472 7 December 2020 Dear Nigel Lawrence, Thank you for your Freedom of Information (FoI) request received on 12 November. You asked for: “Please provide a list of all private sector organisations to which DWP has awarded a contract to purchases services in connection with the provision of any interventions designed to help claimants to enter the labour market. My request includes, but is not limited to, employability courses and individual employment advice including tailored assistance with completing employment applications.” DWP Response I can confirm that the Department holds the information you are seeking for contracts awarded since 2009. Since 2009 DWP Employment Category has awarded contracts for interventions designed to help claimants enter the labour market to the following providers. 15billion 3SC A4e Ltd Aberdeen Foyer Access to Industry Acorn Training Advance Housing & Support Ltd ADVANCED PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT GROUP (UK) LIMITED Adviza Partnership Amacus Ltd Apex Scotland APM UK Ltd Atos IT Services UK Limited Autism Alliance UK Babington Business College Barnardo's 1 Best Practice Training & Development Ltd Burnley Telematics and Teleworking Limited Business Sense Associates C & K Careers Ltd Campbell Page Capital Engineering Group Holdings Capital Training Group Careers Development Group CDG-WISE Ability
    [Show full text]
  • DWP London Project List
    Match funding information on this list shows the estimated value of the match that the DWP as a CFO will use from that contract in the 2007-2013 ESF programme. This will be different from the full indicative value of the whole ESF contract. Sometimes only a partial value from a match contract is used if that is all that the DWP CFO needs in order to match 50:50 with their ESF spend. The figures will not be finalised until the ESF spend is completed. Region: London CFO: DWP Provider Project Title ESF Match Subcontractor Contract Contract Name Funding Funding Start Date End Date Priority 1 (closed) TNG Ltd ESOL Provision £2,094,990 £0 Springboard 28/07/2008 27/07/2011 Tomorrows Outreach and £1,612,000 £0 Community Links 28/07/2008 27/07/2011 People Trust Ltd Hardest to Help Springboard Tomorrows Pre-Employment £3,600,000 £0 South Bank Employers Group 28/07/2008 27/07/2011 People Trust Ltd Skills and In St Mungo's Ingeus Help for the £1,950,00 £0 Inbiz 21/07/2008 20/07/2011 Homeless Southwark Works Spotlights and The Start Project Ingeus Breakthrough £2,293,332 £0 South Bank Employers Group 21/07/2008 20/07/2011 and Right Road 5E Ltd Programmes Richmond Fellowship Seetec Hardest to Help £4,100,000 £0 ProDiverse UK Ltd 23/06/2008 22/06/2011 Royal London Society for the Blind Lifeline Working Links Hardest to Help £4,042,505 £0 Disablement Association of 14/07/2008 13/07/2011 Barking and Dagenham Praxis Eco-Actif Services CIC Information correct at: 19/01/2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice for Sale – the Privatisation of Offender Management Services
    Justice for sale – the privatisation of offender management services A TUC report based on research by the New Economics Foundation Acknowledgements This report presents findings from research undertaken by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) commissioned by the Trades Union Congress (TUC). The TUC would like to thank the author Stephen Whitehead and his colleagues Helen Kersley and Jacob Mohun at NEF for their hard work and contribution to this project. 3 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Electronic monitoring and private prisons 3 Probation services 4 Conclusion and recommendations 4 5 Section one 1 Introduction Preface This report presents findings from research undertaken by Stephen Whitehead at the New Economics Foundation (NEF) which was commissioned by the Trades Union Congress (TUC). The research investigates the outsourcing of public services in key sectors – offender management, employment services, health care, social care and local government services. This first report examines the outsourcing of offender management in England and Wales and looks at prisons and the supervision of offenders in the community. It also reviews three significant contracting areas – prisons, electronic monitoring and probation. Based on this research, the TUC has identified a set of policy recommendations to address specific issues related to the outsourcing of offender management services, and also others which are applicable to public services more broadly. Offender management This report looks at the outsourcing of offender management – prisons and the supervision of offenders in the community – in England and Wales. The introduction of competition has had a significant impact on delivery, with fewer staff employed and lower salaries now paid in private prisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Programme Supply Chains
    Work Programme Supply Chains The information contained in the table below reflects updates and changes to the Work Programme supply chains and is correct as at 30 September 2013. It is published in the interests of transparency. It is limited to those in supply chains delivering to prime providers as part of their tier 1 and 2 chains. Definitions of what these tiers incorporate vary from prime provider to prime provider. There are additional suppliers beyond these tiers who are largely to be called on to deliver one off, unique interventions in response to a particular participants needs and circumstances. The Department for Work and Pensions fully anticipate that supply chains will be dynamic, with scope to flex and evolve to reflect change within the labour market and participant needs. The Department intends to update this information at regular intervals (generally every 6 months) dependant on time and resources available. In addition to the Merlin standard, a robust process is in place for the Department to approve any supply chain changes and to ensure that the service on offer is not compromised or reduced. Comparison between the corrected March 2013 stock take and the September 2013 figures shows a net increase in the overall number of organisations in the supply chains across all sectors. The table below illustrates these changes Sector Number of organisations in the supply chain Private At 30 September 2013 - 367 compared to 351 at 31 March 2013 Public At 30 September 2013 - 128 compared to 124 at 30 March 2013 Voluntary or Community (VCS) At 30 September 2013 - 363 compared to 355 at 30 March 2013 Totals At 30 September 2013 - 858 organisations compared to 830 at March 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Magazine for Free
    editorial Corporate It has almost become a self-evident truth that unemployment has been growing progressively over the last two decades, both in scale and in its significance for social and economic policy. How and why are often ignored but a vast Watch industry to ‘manage’ this ‘crisis’ has developed. From flourishing private companies, such as A4e, contracted by the Department for Work and Pensions to deliver what Jobcentre Plus has apparently failed to achieve, through tens of Newsletter 45/46: subcontracted employment services providers, to a growing sector of so-called Winter 2009/2010 voluntary organisations that depend on this reserve army of unemployed people to source their ‘slave’ workforce. This double issue of the Corporate Watch Corporate Watch is an independent not-for- Newsletter takes a look at this relatively new ‘unemployment business’; its profit research group, which aims to expose protagonists, ideological, political and economic premises and how it is being how large corporations function, and the utilised by the New Labour government to dismantle what’s left of the welfare detrimental effects they have on society state. and the environment as an inevitable result of their current legal structure. Corporate The ‘unemployment crisis’ has certainly been exacerbated by the recent Watch strives for a society that is ecologically economic downturn, with many employers going bust, but that’s not the whole sustainable, democratic, equitable and story. Many big businesses have also exploited the current climate to push non-exploitative. Progress towards such a for compulsory redundancies. More importantly, the recession and the rising society may, in part, be achieved through number of jobless people have been skilfully employed by politicians and dismantling the vast economic and political government officials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work Programme National Partnership Forum – Wednesday 5 June 2013
    The Work Programme National Partnership Forum – Wednesday 5 June 2013 Chair – Richard Aitken-Davies Attendees: Please see attached list. Formal Opening of the Work Programme National Partnership Forum Richard Aitken-Davies formally opened the Work Programme Partnership Forum and thanked everyone for their attendance. Director of Contracted Customer services Directorate Richard introduced the new Director for Contracted Customer Services Directorate, Simon Tse. Simon joined the directorate in April 2013. Work Programme Performance Update Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and providers confirmed performance meetings have now been completed which focused on year 2. The forward look at performance is clearly set for the year ahead. It was agreed that DWP and providers continue to work together, developing improvement ideas and sharing good practice in order to ensure processes remain robust in driving up the performance of The Work Programme, and should any issues arise, respond quickly with effective improvement plans. It was agreed that work continues between DWP and providers to ensure the media has a full a picture as possible of the programme to ensure clarity of understanding the statistics when released. Next statistical release date 27 June 2013. Best Practice Group The meeting received an overview of the remit of the above group. Further details can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/helping-more-of-the-hardest-to-help-into-work Universal Credit The forum was updated on the latest available information on the development of Universal Credit. Work Programme Partnership Forum 1 AOB The focus of the Work Programme National Partnership Forum and Terms of Reference was reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work Programme Partnership Forum Monday 26 September 2011
    The Work Programme Partnership Forum Monday 26 September 2011 Chair – Richard Aitken-Davies Attendees: Please see attached list. Action Points: Please see attached. Presentations: Embedded in note. Formal Opening of the Work Programme Partnership Forum Richard Aitken-Davies formally opened the inaugural meeting of the Work Programme Partnership Forum and thanked everyone for their attendance. Role of the Forum It was agreed that the main group should be made up of Work Programme prime providers and a small group of key DWP officials. The Forum needs to consider how to link up with other high interest groups. Forum members need to consider how best to engage with partners at CPA level. Feedback to the secretariat and a proposition will be developed for consideration. Some areas for consideration are: Local Authorities would like to know more and be more widely involved; and How do LEP and Employer Engagement Boards link into and support the Forum. Stakeholders at a local level need a broad awareness of the strategic policy and operational issues that impact on the Work Programme but the mechanism needs to be owned centrally by DWP. Discussion took place on the proposition of having a Stakeholder Board to support the Partnership Forum. The Forum members agreed that there should be a number of ‘Special Interest Groups’ where the main Forum would define the remit of these groups, for example, a group that focus their attention on the Skills Agenda. (JHP Group Ltd) agreed to pull together a proposal for the main Forum. Forum members to suggest what ‘Special Interest Groups’ would be useful to have to feed into the main Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • DWP Provider Assurance Statistics
    DWP Provider Assurance Statistics Results The table below shows the current assurance levels of existing DWP CEP providers (see footnotes) who have been reviewed by Provider Assurance Team (PAT) as at 31 October 2015. The vast majority of providers are assessed as “reasonable” which means that the Department is assured that the controls a provider has in place are effectively able to identify and manage risk. For those providers assessed as weak and limited PAT will monitor the provider to ensure the necessary improvement actions are implemented. If the provider fails to improve DWP will take remedial action which may lead to contract breach activities. Provider Assurance Level CDG-WISE Ability Ltd Strong Serco Welfare Services Ltd Strong A4e Ltd* Reasonable Advance Housing & Support Ltd. Reasonable Avanta Enterprise Ltd.* Reasonable G4S Regional Management (UK&I) Ltd Reasonable Ingeus UK Ltd. Reasonable Interserve Learning & Employment Reasonable Learndirect Ltd Reasonable MAXIMUS Employment & Training Ltd Reasonable Momentum Skills Reasonable NCG Reasonable Pertemps People Development Group Ltd. Reasonable Prospects Services Ltd. Reasonable Reed in Partnership Reasonable Rehab Jobfit LLP Group Reasonable Seetec Reasonable CDG Shaw Trust Reasonable Social Finance Reasonable The Pluss Organisation Reasonable Working Links (Employment) Ltd Reasonable Atos IT Services UK Ltd. Limited The Wise Group Weak * Organisation is now trading as PeoplePlus Definition of Assurance Levels Opinion Definition Strong Governance, risk management and control arrangements operated provide strong assurance that material risks are identified and managed efficiently and effectively, although improvements may be recommended. Reasonable Governance, risk management and control arrangements operated provide reasonable assurance that material risks are identified and managed efficiently and effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The DWP Work Programme - the Impact of the DWP Procurement Model on Personal Service Innovation
    1 A MIOIR Case Study on Public Procurement and Innovation The DWP Work Programme - the Impact of the DWP Procurement Model on Personal Service Innovation Su Maddock This is a case study of the UK government’s Work Programme procurement process between 2011 and 2012 and is part of a larger Manchester Institute for Innovation Research Project on Public Procurement and Innovation, Underpinn funded by the ESRC/BIS/NESTA/TSB. A House of Lords Report confirmed the importance of commissioning and procurement in capturing and embedding innovation; however, it also raised doubts about innovation procurement practice and the competence of procurers. Innovation policy is rarely underpinned by empirical research and is usually based on policy assumptions that all innovation procurement can be managed through conventional, top-down function institutional processes in a controlled and predictable fashion. Evidence suggests that public service innovations, such as personalised services for claimants, are less easy to take to scale through procurement. As the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP)’s Work Programme is one of government’s key reforms and involves a huge, national out-sourcing process it is an obvious choice for a case-study on public procurement and service innovation. The study draws on the views and experiences of relevant stakeholders and the impact of the Work Programme’s two-tier procurement model on the capacity of companies to deliver personalised services to long-term claimants. It draws attention to the dynamics of the supply chain, the impact of financial of incentives to prime contractors, government’s innovation strategies and business model.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Futures: Opportunities for People and Place
    Employment Futures: Opportunities for People and Place Wednesday 5 December 2018 Registration: 08.00 – 09.15 Conference: 09.15 – 17.00 Networking drinks reception: 17.00 – 18.00 The Tower Hotel, St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1LD If 2018 has been about questions, 2019 will be about answers. What will replace the European Social Fund? How will the UK labour market situation respond to Brexit? Are combined authorities the answer to integrated employment and skills? Will robots really take our jobs? This year the ERSA Annual Conference will seek to answer the most pressing questions asked by you over the last year, ranging from what is the opportunity around rehabilitation and prison education to how your organisation might access money through the Department for Work and Pensions’ Dynamic Purchasing System. The focus will be unashamedly upbeat. Regardless of what the future might bring, ERSA exists to support you deliver the very best employment support services. So book your place now to hear politicians, economists, providers and policy experts do their very best in crystal ball gazing. They might not have all the answers, but we’ll learn and network along the way. The ERSA Conference Programme 2018 – sponsored by Seetec 08.00 - 09.15 Registration and networking 08.00 – 09.00 Institute of Employability Professionals Breakfast (Discovery Suite) The Employability Practitioner Apprenticeship Standard - What's next? 09.15 - 09.20 Welcome and introduction to the day Kirsty McHugh, Conference Chair and Chief Executive, ERSA 09.20 – 09.30 Chair’s Address: Brian Bell, Chair of the ERSA Board 09.30 – 10.00 Ministerial Address: Sarah Newton MP, Minister of State for Disabled People, Health and Work 10.00 – 11.15 Plenary 1: Uncertain Waters Ahead? Navigating economic and political uncertainties With every other day a ‘crunch day’ in our national political life, this session will explore the potential economic and political issues affecting the year ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust for London.Indd
    What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? An Open Space Event at Lambeth Town Hall on Tuesday 16th September 2014 What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? An Open Space Event 1 Open Space Using the Open Space process participants created an agenda of discussion /questions and topics prompted by the question: What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? Groups formed and the following recommendations emerged from discussion. The numbers in brackets reflect the votes assigned to different ideas at the end of the meeting. What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? An Open Space Event 2 Key themes within the recommendations 1. A more streamlined approach required so that the divisions between unemployed and employed are not so stark • Integrate ‘back to work’ and ‘progression’ support into a seamless service that would address the underlying issues – that of poverty. Services should be configured so that they are regarded as ‘employment pathways’. The target should be ‘above poverty’ wages (not just any job). • JCP (Job Centre Plus) need to change their objectives as currently only focused on getting any job, they should be more focused on good employment/progression. 2. Targeted advice needed • Investment in workforce development (for employment support providers) which would include developing their skills in the additional advice needed for those in low paid work such as negotiating with employers (for more wages/promotion); knowledge of in-work and other forms of training opportunities; marketing the support to low paid workers and offering this in a flexible way (evenings/weekends).
    [Show full text]
  • Business Services Association 130 Fleet Street, London. EC4A 2BH
    Business Services Association 130 Fleet Street, London. EC4A 2BH BSA – The Business Services Association Submission to the Apprenticeships Inquiry by the Sub-Committee on Education, Skills and the Economy March 2016 The BSA welcomes the opportunity to provide evidence to the Sub-Committee on Education, Skills and the Economy on apprenticeships. The BSA – the Business Services Association – is a policy and research organisation. It brings together all those who are interested in delivering efficient, flexible and cost-effective service and infrastructure projects across the private and public sectors. The business services sector accounts for over 9.3 per cent of economy-wide gross value added to the economy with an annual turnover of around £263 billion, and employs 3.3 million people, or 10 per cent of the UK workforce.1 BSA full members employ over 17,000 apprentices and provide around 845,000 days of training each year. The business services sector considers apprentices to be a key part of their workforce and provides schemes across a wide range of services and skills areas, from engineering, construction and security to facilities management, cleaning and food services; from customer service, ICT and business development to finance, human resources and administration. Many BSA members have been involved in trailblazer schemes and work with apprenticeships in SMEs through their supply chains. The target of three million apprentices by 2020, how the Government proposes to achieve this and how this may affect the 'skills gap' The Government’s target to reach three million new apprenticeship starts by 2020 is an ambitious goal. It ensures a sustained focus on apprenticeships and shines a spotlight on issues such as careers advice for school leavers and the relationship between higher education and the labour market.
    [Show full text]