DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Space and Recreation Plan 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Space and Recreation Plan 2009 TOWN OF DARTMOUTH, MA OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN 2009 DNRT and the TTOR: Slocum’s River Reserve Prepared by the Open Space and Recreation Committee On behalf of the Dartmouth Board of Selectman, Conservation Commission, Planning Board, Recreation Commission and Park Department November 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The volunteer Open Space and Recreation Committee has worked over the past year in the creation of this Plan. Members of this Committee included Steven Souza, Tim Lancaster, Beverly King, David Brownell, Dexter Mead, Dr. Steve Russell, Ernest Fisher, Joan Bullard, Joe Vieira, John Haran, John Nunes, Patty Sweriduk, and Steve Melo. A community development consultant, Teri Bernert, was hired by the Town to coordinate the drafting of this Plan. The Center for Policy Analysis at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, was retained by the Town to tabulate the results of the Planning Survey. Sarah Williams, Regional Planner from the Buzzards Bay Project, provided updated maps for the plan. The Open Space and Recreation Committee wishes to thank the following individuals and groups who contributed to the Plan: Sarah Williams, Buzzards Bay Project Dexter Mead and the staff and Board of DNRT Agricultural Commission Clyde Barrow and David Borges, Center for Policy Analysis, UMass DYSA, DGAL, DYAA, DYFL, DYLA Community Preservation Committee Steven Russell, School Department Council on Aging staff Dartmouth Historical Commission Dartmouth Heritage Trust Michael O’Reilly and the Conservation Commission Mark Rasmussen, The Coalition For Buzzards Bay The Trustees of Reservations Michael Steinitz, Massachusetts Historical Commission Planning Department Staff: Donald Perry, Joyce Couture, and Elizabeth Smith-Bochman Park and Recreation Department Staff: Tim Lancaster and Rebecca Amaral SRPEDD Regional Planning Agency Lloyd Center for the Environment i TOWN OF DARTMOUTH Open Space and Recreation Plan 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................i Index of Maps...........................................................................................................iv Section 1: Plan Summary ............................................................................1 Section 2: Introduction ...............................................................................3 A. Statement of Purpose ............................................................................3 B. Planning Process and Public Participation ........................................10 Section 3: Community Setting ...................................................................12 A. Regional Context ....................................................................................12 B. History of the Community ......................................................................17 C. Population Characteristics.....................................................................20 D. Growth and Development Patterns .......................................................27 E. Local Recreation and Open Space Interests ..........................................35 Section 4: Environmental Inventory and Analysis ...................................46 A. Geology, Soils and Topography..............................................................46 B. Landscape Character .............................................................................46 C. Water Resources ....................................................................................49 D. Vegetation ..............................................................................................64 E. Fisheries and Wildlife ............................................................................72 F. Scenic Resources and Unique Environments .........................................75 G. Environmental Challenges ....................................................................78 Section 5: Inventory of Lands of Conservation and Recreation Interest 81 A. Protected Parcels .................................................................................82 B. Unprotected/Restricted Parcels ...........................................................91 ii Section 6: Community Vision ....................................................................104 A. Description of Process............................................................................104 B. Statement of Open Space and Recreation Goals ....................................104 Section 7: Analysis of Needs .......................................................................105 A. Summary of Resource Protection Needs ................................................105 B. Summary of Community's Needs ............................................................110 C. Management Needs, Potential Change of Use ......................................118 Section 8: Goals and Objectives..................................................................123 Section 9: Five-Year Action Plan................................................................125 Section 10: Public Comments ....................................................................136 Section 11: References ................................................................................140 Section 12: Appendices................................................................................141 A. Town of Dartmouth Open Space and Recreation Survey and Results iii INDEX OF MAPS-2009 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN Regional Context Map ...............................................................................................13 Environnemental Justice Populations ........................................................................23 Population Density.....................................................................................................24 Current Land Use.......................................................................................................33 Zoning Map................................................................................................................34 Soils and Geologic Features Map .............................................................................47 Unique Features Map ................................................................................................48 Water Resources Map ...............................................................................................53 Flood Hazard Map ....................................................................................................54 Watershed Map .........................................................................................................55 Aquifer Protection Districts ......................................................................................56 Plant/Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................................70 Vegetative Cover Map ..............................................................................................71 Permanently Protected Lands Map ...........................................................................102 Unprotected and Temporarily Protected Lands Map.................................................103 Service Areas for Recreation Facilities Map ............................................................122 Action Plan Map ........................................................................................................136 iv SECTION 1 PLAN SUMMARY The 2009 Dartmouth Open Space and Recreation Plan is an update of the 2002 Open Space and Recreation Plan. The Plan is intended to act as a blueprint for the future expansion of Dartmouth’s parks and recreational areas, while also recommending strategies for the preservation of Dartmouth’s agricultural lands and natural resources. This Plan has evolved from the previous Open Space and Recreation plans dating from 1988, 1996 and 2002 and the recent 2007 Dartmouth Master Plan and has been redesigned to reflect the opinions of Dartmouth's residents today as well as the changing characteristics of the community. Dartmouth's Open Space and Recreation Plan has been developed in accordance with the applicable requirements and guidelines set forth by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Division of Conservation Services. The Commonwealth requires that all municipalities file an open space and recreation plan every five years as a means of satisfying eligibility requirements for state and federal grant aid offered through the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs. The first step of the Open Space and Recreation Committee to update the plan was the creation of a survey to gather input from Dartmouth residents. With the recent completion of the Dartmouth Master Plan, the Committee decided to develop a targeted survey that centered on open space and recreation issues and undergo an extensive interview process to obtain a good sense of the needs of special interest groups. Based on the survey results, the open space inventory, and needs of special interest groups, the Committee determined that the following open space and recreation needs were critical within the Town: Need to permanently protect and expand unique environments Need to protect farmland resources Need to improve water quality of Dartmouth’s water resources Need to preserve open space within Dartmouth’s aquifer protection districts Need for sustainable development Need to protect Dartmouth’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Return of Organization Exempt from Income
    r Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax Form 990 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung Under section 501(c), LOOL benefit trust or private foundation) Department or me Ti2asury Internal Revenue Service 1 The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements A For the 2002 calendar year, or tax year period beginning APR 1 2002 and i MAR 31, 2003 B Check if Please C Name of organization D Employer identification number use IRS nddmss label or [::]change print or HE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS 04-2105780 ~changa s~ Number and street (or P.0 box if mad is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number =Initial return sPecisc572 ESSEX STREET 978 921-1944 Final = City or town, state or country, and ZIP +4 F Pccoun6npmethad 0 Cash [K] Accrual return Other =Amended~'d~° [BEVERLY , MA 01915 licatio" ~ o S ~~ . El Section 501(c)(3) organizations and 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trusts H and I are not applicable to section 527 organizations. :'dl°° must attach a completed Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) . H(a) Is this a group retain for affiliates ~ Yes OX No G web site: OWW " THETRUSTEES . ORG H(b) It 'Yes,' enter number of affiliates 10, J Organization type (cnakonly one) " OX 501(c) ( 3 ) 1 (Insert no) = 4947(a)(1) or = 52 H(c) Are all affiliates inciuded9 N/A 0 Yes 0 No (If -NO,- attach a list ) K Check here " 0 if the organization's gross receipts are normally not more than $25,000 .
    [Show full text]
  • BBP8911 Technical Resource Manual
    TECHNICAL RESOURCE MANUAL: A REFERENCE FOR BUZZARDS BAY COWUNITIES AUGUST 1987 Credits Compiled, with additional text, by Susan R. Moor and William S. Napolitano Stephen C. Smith, Executive Director Thomas A. Pisaturo, Comprehensive Planning Manager Tracy Cabral, Secretary Anne Duf resne, Secretary , - This report was prepared by the Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District (SRPEDD), with funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Buzzards Bay Project. u This report represents the technical results of an investigation funded by the Buzzards Bay Project. The results and conclusions contained herein are those of the author(s). These conclusions have been reviewed by competent outside reviewers and found to be reasonable and legitimate based on the available data. The Management Committee of the Buzzards Bay Project accepts this report as technically sound and complete. The conclusions do not necessarily represent the recommendations of the Buzzards Bay Project. Final recommendations for resource management actions will be based upon the results of this and other investigations. Environmental Protection ~gency Thomas Bigford National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Steve Bliven Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Leigh Bridges Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jack Clarke Cape Cod Planning and Economic Development Commission Richard De,laney Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Meriel Hardin Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Dr. Russell Isaac Massachusetts Division of Water Pollution Control Dr. Susan Peterson President, Coalition for Buzzards Bay Dr. Don Phelps Environmental Protection Agency Ted Pratt Chairman, Buzzards Bay Citizens Advisory Committee Stephen Smith Southeast Regional Planning and Economic Development District BNC~Tripp Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs This report represents the technical results of an investigation funded by the Buzzards Bay Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
    Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project
    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Slocum’s and Little River Estuaries, Dartmouth, MA FINAL REPORT – December 2008 Brian Howes Tony Millham Roland Samimy David Schlezinger John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Ed Eichner Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean W. Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri, and Elizabeth White Lloyd Center for the Environment Mark Mello Cape Cod Commission Xiaotong Wu © [2007] University of Massachusetts All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Massachusetts Estuaries Project Technical Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the critical coastal resources of the Slocum's and Little River Estuaries and supported the application of the Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for these systems. Without these stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible. First and foremost we would like to recognize and applaud the significant time and effort in data collection and discussion spent by members of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's BayWatcher, Water Quality Monitoring Program. These individuals gave of their time to consistent and sound nutrient related water quality from this system for over a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife 2018 Annual Report 147 Annual Report 2018 Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Jack Buckley Director (July 2017–May 2018) Mark S. Tisa, Ph.D., M.B.A. Acting Director (May–June 2018) 149 Table of Contents 2 The Board Reports 6 Fisheries 42 Wildlife 66 Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program 82 Information & Education 95 Archivist 96 Hunter Education 98 District Reports 124 Wildlife Lands 134 Federal Aid 136 Staff and Agency Recognition 137 Personnel Report 140 Financial Report Appendix A Appendix B About the Cover: MassWildlife staff prepare to stock trout at Lake Quinsigamond in Worcester with the help of the public. Photo by Troy Gipps/MassWildlife Back Cover: A cow moose stands in a Massachusetts bog. Photo by Bill Byrne/MassWildlife Printed on Recycled Paper. ELECTRONIC VERSION 1 The Board Reports Joseph S. Larson, Ph.D. Chairperson Overview fective April 30, 2018, and the Board voted the appoint- ment of Deputy Director Mark Tisa as Acting Director, The Massachusetts Fisheries and Wildlife Board con- effective Mr. Buckley’s retirement. The Board -mem sists of seven persons appointed by the Governor to bers expressed their gratitude and admiration to the 5-year terms. By law, the individuals appointed to the outgoing Director for his close involvement in develop- Board are volunteers, receiving no remuneration for ing his staff and his many accomplishments during his their service to the Commonwealth. Five of the sev- tenure, not only as Director but over his many years as en are selected on a regional basis, with one member, Deputy Director in charge of Administration, primarily by statute, representing agricultural interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The North American Wetlands Conservation Act: Working for Massachusetts
    The North American Wetlands Conservation Act: Working for Massachusetts The North American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) is an incentive-based, landowner- friendly program that fosters the development of public-private partnerships to protect North America’s migratory bird habitat. NAWCA Positively Impacts the Economy and Creates Jobs The Great Marsh NAWCA benefits the national economy by translating $411 million in federal appropriations into nearly $3.5 billion in additional economic activity in the United States. These expenditures have created, on average, nearly 7,500 new jobs annually in the United States, generating over $200 million in worker earnings each year. NAWCA Effectively Leverages Private Sector Funds Since enactment, NAWCA grants have leveraged more than $3.2 billion in matching funds to deliver a total of over $4.2 billion in on-the-ground conservation. NAWCA requires a 1:1 match, but federal funds are often tripled or quadrupled by partners at the local level. NAWCA Expands Recreational Opportunities For People Photo courtesy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The abundance of wildlife including many species of water- fowl, migratory birds, fish, and mammals supported by wet- The Great Marsh is the largest salt marsh in New lands translates into multi-billion dollar activities for Americans England and is internationally recognized as important who enjoy hunting, fishing, wildlife viewing, and photography. breeding ground and habitat for waterfowl, waterbirds, shorebirds, and many more. The area also offers NAWCA Benefits Hundreds Of Wildlife Species recreational opportunities throughout the North Shore. NAWCA helps fulfill the mission of the North American Wa- terfowl Management Plan by providing migratory birds with To secure and restore 563 acres of wetlands in the essential habitat needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ravenswood: Wilderness to Special Place Lecture Finding Aid & Transcript
    RAVENSWOOD: WILDERNESS TO SPECIAL PLACE LECTURE FINDING AID & TRANSCRIPT Speaker: Electa Kane Tritsch Date: 11/15/2008 Runtime: 1:16:24 Camera Operator: Bob Quinn Identification: VL15; Video Lecture #15 Citation: Tritsch, Electa Kane. “Ravenswood: Wilderness to Special Place.” CAM Video Lecture Series, 11/15/2008. VL15, Cape Ann Museum Library & Archives, Gloucester, MA. Copyright: Requests for permission to publish material from this collection should be addressed to the Librarian/Archivist. Language: English Finding Aid: Description: Karla Kaneb, 3/21/2020. Transcript: Monica Lawton, 5/6/2020. Video Description Learn about the early history of the Cape Ann area with this video that features a lecture offered at the Cape Ann Museum in collaboration with The Trustees of Reservations. Historian and archaeologist Electa Kane Tritsch begins by tracking the inhabitation of the Gloucester peninsula from early Native American activity to subsequent European colonization. Drawing upon old maps and legal documents, she then extends this timeline for the Freshwater Cove area through Ravenswood: Wilderness to Special Place – VL15 – page 2 to the present, including Gloucester native and philanthropist Samuel Elwell Sawyer, who acquired and then donated the 205 acres that formed the basis of Ravenswood Park upon his death in 1889. Since that time, The Trustees have expanded and maintained this naturalist’s haven for the study and enjoyment of visitors from both near and far. Subject list William Champlain Freshwater Cove Richard Varrell Old Salem Road Samuel Elwell Sawyer Ravenswood Park Mason Walton The Trustees of Reservations Electa Kane Tritsch Transcript 0:11 Linda Marshall: Hi, my name is Linda Marshall and I'm the director of programs at the museum, and I want to welcome you all this afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Summary of Proposed Changes
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) Unit C00, Clark Pond, Massachusetts Summary of Proposed Changes Type of Unit: System Unit County: Essex Congressional District: 6 Existing Map: The existing CBRS map depicting this unit is: ■ 025 dated October 24, 1990 Proposed Boundary Notice of Availability: The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Service) opened a public comment period on the proposed changes to Unit C00 via Federal Register notice. The Federal Register notice and the proposed boundary (accessible through the CBRS Projects Mapper) are available on the Service’s website at www.fws.gov/cbra. Establishment of Unit: The Coastal Barrier Resources Act (Pub. L. 97-348), enacted on October 18, 1982 (47 FR 52388), originally established Unit C00. Historical Changes: The CBRS map for this unit has been modified by the following legislative and/or administrative actions: ■ Coastal Barrier Improvement Act (Pub. L. 101-591) enacted on November 16, 1990 (56 FR 26304) For additional information on historical legislative and administrative actions that have affected the CBRS, see: https://www.fws.gov/cbra/Historical-Changes-to-CBRA.html. Proposed Changes: The proposed changes to Unit C00 are described below. Proposed Removals: ■ One structure and undeveloped fastland near Rantoul Pond along Fox Creek Road ■ Four structures and undeveloped fastland located to the north of Argilla Road and east of Fox Creek Proposed Additions: ■ Undeveloped fastland and associated aquatic habitat along Treadwell Island Creek,
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Estuaries Project
    Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Apponagansett Bay Estuary, Dartmouth, MA University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Massachusetts Department of School of Marine Science and Technology Environmental Protection DRAFT REPORT – JUNE 2015 Massachusetts Estuaries Project Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for the Apponagansett Bay Estuary, Dartmouth, MA DRAFT REPORT – JUNE 2015 Brian Howes Tony Millham Ed Eichner Roland Samimy David Schlezinger John Ramsey Trey Ruthven Contributors: US Geological Survey Don Walters and John Masterson Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Inc. Elizabeth Hunt and Sean Kelley Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Charles Costello and Brian Dudley SMAST Coastal Systems Program Jennifer Benson, Michael Bartlett, Sara Sampieri, and Elizabeth White Lloyd Center for the Environment Mark Mello MAE, Inc. Maisy McDarby Stanovich ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Massachusetts Estuaries Project Technical Team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the critical coastal resources of the Slocum's and Little River Estuaries and supported the application of the Linked Watershed-Embayment Model to Determine Critical Nitrogen Loading Thresholds for these systems. Without these stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible. First and foremost we would like to recognize and applaud the significant time and effort in data collection and discussion spent by members of the Coalition for Buzzards Bay's BayWatcher, Water Quality Monitoring Program. These individuals gave of their time to consistent and sound nutrient related water quality from this system for over a decade. These data were enhanced by short-term intensive water quality monitoring efforts by the Lloyd Center Staff and interns participating in the Turn the Tide Project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report | Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, MA
    Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 6: May 08-April 09 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES PII Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Storm Water Manager Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: Richard K. Sullivan Title: Commissioner Date: 9/7/2010 Page 1 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Part II. Self-Assessment The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has completed the required self-assessment and has determined that we are in compliance with all permit conditions, except as noted in the following tables. DCR received authorization to discharge under the general permit from EPA on November 8, 2007 and from DEP on November 21, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Breeze
    The Southeast Breeze Quarterly newsletter of the Appalachian Mountain Club, Southeastern Massachusetts Chapter Winter 2009-2010 — December, January, February View from the Chair By Wayne Anderson, Chapter Chair As I sit looking over my backyard with its landlocked Ark (hopefully where it will remain), I realize it has been a year since I began my term as Chair. It is easy to drift off reflecting upon how it was I got here (Thanks Mike!) and on all the fun that I have had in the past year filled with so many eventful AMC outings. My previous columns have focused on encouraging folks to get out and join an activity or a trip offered by one of our committees. I am pleased to report that there has been a significant increase in participation in our trips, bringing many new faces to the outdoors. I do not believe that this happened by chance. It was the result of many hours of work by our members and their continued effort in keeping the pipeline filled with activities planned for six months in advance. I would like to thank the executive board for its hard work and dedication. The board’s professionalism and support for the committees made it possible for them to offer such quality services and trips. Many thanks also to the committees that worked hard at keeping their activities dynamic and fresh. My final thanks go to the feet on the street – those who led, organized, or worked behind the scenes providing support for activities. Thank you all for your time and for your camaraderie in making this the most dynamic chapter in the club.
    [Show full text]