Report on the Justice Bill (NIA 37/11-15) Volume 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Justice Bill (NIA 37/11-15) Volume 1 Committee for Justice Report on the Justice Bill (NIA 37/11-15) Volume 1 Together with the Minutes of Proceedings, Minutes of Evidence, Written Submissions and Other Memoranda and Papers relating to the Report Ordered by the Committee for Justice to be printed 25 March 2015 Mandate 2011/16 Seventh Report - NIA 240/11-16 Powers and Membership Powers and Membership Powers The Committee for Justice is a Statutory Departmental Committee established in accordance with paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Belfast Agreement, Section 29 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and under Standing Order 48. The Committee has a scrutiny, policy development and consultation role with respect to the Department of Justice and has a role in the initiation of legislation. The Committee has the power to: ■ consider and advise on Departmental budgets and annual plans in the context of the overall budget allocation; ■ consider relevant subordinate legislation and take the Committee stage of primary legislation; ■ call for persons and papers; ■ initiate inquires and make reports; and ■ consider and advise on any matters brought to the Committee by the Minister of Justice. Membership The Committee has 11 members including a Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson and a quorum of 5. The membership of the Committee during the current mandate has been as follows: Mr Alastair Ross (Chairman) 1 Mr Raymond McCartney (Deputy Chairman) Mr Stewart Dickson Mr Sammy Douglas2,3,4 Mr Tom Elliott5 Mr Paul Frew6 Mr Chris Hazzard7,8 Mr Séan Lynch Mr Alban Maginness Mr Patsy McGlone9 Mr Edwin Poots2,10 1 With effect from 10 December 2014 Mr Alastair Ross replaced Mr Paul Givan as Chairman. 2 With effect from 1 October 2012 Mr William Humphrey and Mr Alex Easton replaced Mr Peter Weir and Mr Sydney Anderson. 3 With effect from 16 September 2013 Mr Sydney Anderson replaced Mr Alex Easton. 4 With effect from 6 October 2014 Mr Sammy Douglas replaced Mr Sydney Anderson. 5 With effect from 23 April 2012 Mr Tom Elliott replaced Mr Basil McCrea. 6 With effect from 6 October 2014 Mr Paul Frew replaced Mr Jim Wells. 7 With effect from 10 September 2012 Ms Rosaleen McCorley replaced Ms Jennifer McCann. 8 With effect from 6 October 2014 Mr Chris Hazzard replaced Ms Rosaleen McCorley. 9 With effect from 23 April 2012 Mr Patsy McGlone replaced Mr Colum Eastwood. 10 With effect from 6 October 2014 Mr Edwin Poots replaced Mr William Humphrey. i ii Table of Contents Table of Contents Volume 1 List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the Report iv Report Executive Summary 1 Introduction 15 Consideration of the Provisions in the Bill 19 Consideration of other proposed Provisions for inclusion in the Bill 63 Clause by Clause Consideration of the Bill 75 Appendix 1 Minutes of Proceedings (Extracts) 111 Appendix 2 Minutes of Evidence 167 Volume 2 Appendix 3 Written Submissions 475 Appendix 4 Memoranda and Correspondence from the Department of Justice 709 Volume 3 Appendix 5 Correspondence relating to the Attorney General’s Proposed Amendment to the Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959 959 Appendix 6 Correspondence relating to the Attorney General’s proposal for Legislative Provision to provide for Rights of Audience for Lawyers working in his Office 1019 Appendix 7 Correspondence relating to the Proposed Amendment by Jim Wells MLA 1057 Appendix 8 Northern Ireland Assembly Research Papers 1063 Appendix 9 Other Papers Considered by the Committee 1133 Appendix 10 List of Witnesses 1139 iii Report on the Justice Bill (NIA 37/11-15) List of abbreviations and acronyms used in the report AG Attorney General AOABH Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm APIL Association of Personal Injury Lawyers CLC Children’s Law Centre CRO Criminal Records Office DHSSPS Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety DBS Disclosure and Barring Service DE Department of Education DoJ Department of Justice DPA Data Protection Act DVPO Domestic Violence Prevention Order ESR Examiner of Statutory Rules ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EQIA Equality Impact Assessment FSNI Forensic Science Northern Ireland HSCB Health and Social Care Board ICO Information Commissioner’s Office JJC Juvenile Justice Centre LCJ Lord Chief Justice LSC Northern Ireland Legal Services Commission NDPB Non Departmental Public Body NICS Northern Ireland Civil Service NIACRO Northern Ireland Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders NICTS Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunals Service NIHRC Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission NIO Northern Ireland Office NIPB Northern Ireland Policing Board NSPCC National Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Children PPS Public Prosecution Service RPA Review of Public Administration iv Table of Contents RQIA Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority SAO Supervised Activity Order SCS Senior Civil Service SOPO Sexual Offences Prevention Order UNCRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child VOO Violent Offences Order VOPO Violent Offences Prevention Order v vi Executive Summary Executive Summary 1. This report sets out the Committee for Justice’s consideration of the Justice Bill. 2. The Justice Bill consists of 92 Clauses and 6 Schedules and proposes to improve the operation of the justice system by improving services provided to victims and witnesses of crime, speeding up the justice system and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of key aspects of the system. In addition to the main clauses of the Bill, the Committee considered a range of proposed amendments brought forward by the Department primarily to address issues raised by the Attorney General during the pre-introductory stage and to put forward new policy proposals related to the main aims of the Bill. 3. The Committee also considered a number of new provisions unrelated to the policy areas currently covered in the Justice Bill which were brought to its attention by the Department of Justice, the Attorney General for Northern Ireland and Mr Jim Wells MLA. 4. The Committee requested evidence from interested organisations and individuals as well as the Department of Justice, the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety and the Attorney General for Northern Ireland as part of its deliberations on the Bill and the proposed amendments. Prior to introduction of the Bill the Committee had considered a wide range of policy proposals relating to the Bill and the views of the Committee had been reflected in a number of the provisions contained within the Bill. The provisions relating to victims and witnesses were also designed to reflect a number of recommendations in the Committee Report on the Inquiry into the Criminal Justice Services available to Victims and Witnesses of Crime. 5. Fifty two written submissions were received together with a significant number of responses from individuals, a number of petitions and almost 22,500 postcards in support of the amendment proposed by Mr Jim Wells MLA. The Committee held 18 oral evidence sessions and also explored the issues raised in written and oral evidence with Department of Justice officials both in writing and in oral briefings. Delegated Powers in the Bill 6. The Committee sought advice from the Examiner of Statutory Rules on the delegated powers within the Bill to make subordinate legislation and the choice of Assembly control provided for each power. The Examiner was of the opinion that most of the delegated powers were appropriate but drew attention to provisions in Clause 79(2) in relation to the general duty to progress criminal proceedings and Clause 80 in relation to case management regulations. The Examiner was of the opinion that if these significant regulation making powers were to be workable in any proper and meaningful way, they would need to have a major input from those involved and there should at least be a built in statutory requirement to consult the Lord Chief Justice, the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, the General Council of the Bar of Northern Ireland and the Law Society of Northern Ireland. The Committee referred the Examiner’s analysis to the Department of Justice and it confirmed that, in response to the concerns raised, it would bring forward appropriate amendments. Key Issues relating to the Clauses and Schedules in the Bill 7. The Committee agreed the clauses in the Bill as drafted or as drafted with proposed departmental amendments at its meeting on 11 March 2015. Some Members expressed reservations regarding Clause 78 which places a duty on solicitors to advise a client about early guilty pleas. The Committee agreed to oppose the inclusion of Clause 86 which provides for supplementary, incidental, consequential and transitional provisions. 1 Report on the Justice Bill (NIA 37/11-15) Part 1 and Schedule 1 – Single Jurisdiction for County Courts and Magistrates’ Courts 8. Part 1 and Schedule 1 of the Bill covers a single jurisdiction in Northern Ireland for the county courts and magistrates’ courts, replacing statutory county court divisions and petty sessions districts with administrative court divisions. The Department also advised of its intention to bring forward a series of further consequential amendments for inclusion in Schedule 1 primarily to remove references to ‘petty sessions district’ and ‘county court division’ in existing legislation and provided the text of the amendments. 9. Organisations that commented on this part of the Bill either welcomed the move to a single jurisdiction or indicated that they did not object in principle to the proposals. They did however raise some concerns regarding the possible impact on court users and wanted to see further information on the operational details of the proposals including the guiding principles for the transfer of business which the Lord Chief Justice has responsibility for developing and implementing. 10. The Committee recognised that a single jurisdiction for the county courts and magistrates’ courts will provide flexibility but it believes that a robust set of directions/guidelines is required to ensure that the assignment of business takes account of the needs of witnesses, victims and defendants to ensure a fair process and the provision of access to justice.
Recommended publications
  • Ltieorising Taw* Thesis Submitted for The
    ·Private and Public aspects of Trespass : Problems of 'ltieorising taW* by: P.c. Vincent-uones Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Department of Law, Sheffield University October 1982 194 Ch. 5. Concrete p:trticular and concrete totality of law scecurirs relations of p?ssession and se~ration. (1) The concrete p:trticular (initial object): the ~l ri2ht to exclude. The concrete particular, and therefore the point of departure for con- crete analysis, is the ri9ht of the sUbject to exclude the world from interference with F?ssession of land. This is the simplest and most irreducible element of the law as it is expressed in a histor- ically determinate and socially constituted practice, at the concrete level of the Apparent movement and in the corresponding organization of legal categories •. This particular "right" is interp<;>latedwithin the structure of Society at a definite stage in its historical development in accord- ance with an economic determination yet to be specified. It may form the basis of legal claims by private individuals or non-human legal persons such as Corporations and Public Authorities (its limits are not exhaustively defined in its interpellation of human subjectsl). Yet its sphere of influence extends far beyond the resolution of dis- putes, informing the concrete practice of legal subjects in everday social situations: it is the foundation of the Company's exclusive control of production within the enterprise, and of the individual's reaction to intrusion: "Hey, you there, what do you think you're doing 1. Since not all legal subjects are "human", the mechanism of interpellation cannot completely account for their creation (requiring as it does a human "recognizing" subject.) [see Hirst, 1979/813] 195 in my garden?,,2 It is not necessary, to justify this starting-point, that legal sub- jects should "know" that their practice in relation to the possession of land is founded on this simple right, or that they be able to explain their attitudes by reference to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Laws Application Bill-98-1
    IMPERIAL LAWS APPLICATION BILL NOTE THIS Bill is being introduced in its present form so as to give notice of the legislation that it foreshadows to Parliament and to others whom it may concern, and to provide those who may be interested with an opportunity to make representations and suggestions in relation to the contemplated legislation at this early formative stage. It is not intended that the Bill should pass in its present form. Work towards completing and polishing the draft, and towards reviewing the Imperial enactments in force in New Zealand, is proceeding under the auspices of the Law Reform Council. It is intended to introduce a revised Bill in due course, and to allow ample time for study of the revised Bill and making representations thereon. The enactment of a definitive statutory list of Imperial subordinate legis- lation in force in New Zealand is contemplated. This list could appropriately be included in the revised Bill, but this course is not intended to be followed if it is likely to cause appreciable delay. Provision for the additional list can be made by a separate Bill. Representations in relation to the present Bill may be made in accordance with the normal practice to the Clerk of the Statutes Revision Committee of tlie House of Representatives. No. 98-1 Price $2.40 IMPERIAL LAWS APPLICATION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTE THIS Bill arises out of a review that is in process of being made by the Law Reform Council of the Imperial enactments in force in New Zealand. The intention is that in due course the present Bill will be allowed to lapse, and a complete revised Bill will be introduced to take its place.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeths Ii Regin^E
    IMPERIAL ACTS APPLICATION ACT. ANNO OCTAVO DECIMO ELIZABETHS II REGIN^E Act No. 30, 1969. An Act to provide that certain enactments of the Parliament of England and of the Parliament of Great Britain and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in force in England at the time of the passing of the Imperial Act 9 George IV Chapter 83 shall continue in force in New South Wales; to replace other enactments of such Parliaments; to repeal other enactments of such Parliaments; to validate certain matters; and for purposes connected therewith. [Assented to, 9th April, 1969.] BE DE it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly of New South Wales in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: — PART I. PRELIMINARY. 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the "Imperial Acts Application Act, 1969". (2) This Act shall, except where otherwise expressly provided, commence upon a day to be appointed by the Governor and notified by proclamation in the Gazette. 2. This Act shall be read and construed subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and so as not to exceed the legislative power of the State, to the intent that where any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. 3. This Act is divided into Parts and Divisions as follows :— PART I.—PRELIMINARY—ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 631 21 November 2017 No. 54 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 21 November 2017 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2017 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 835 21 NOVEMBER 2017 836 Secretary take this opportunity to reiterate our House of Commons Government’s position that the Sri Lankan Government must ratify the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court and that international judges and prosecutors are Tuesday 21 November 2017 involved in the prosecution of historical war crimes in Sri Lanka in order to build confidence that war crimes The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock will be properly investigated and prosecuted? Boris Johnson: I have indeed raised those questions PRAYERS with my opposite number and with the Sri Lankan Government. We believe that they are making progress, but we will continue to insist that more needs to be [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] done. 23. [901963] Daniel Kawczynski (Shrewsbury and Atcham) Oral Answers to Questions (Con): One sees the huge economic growth of some Commonwealth countries, so does the Secretary of State agree that it is important to use the Commonwealth summit as an opportunity for us to start talking about FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE how we are going to recalibrate our exports policy to focus on the Commonwealth? The Secretary of State was asked— Boris Johnson: With 2.4 billion people and some of the fastest growing economies in the world, my hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law Offences of Entering and Remaining on Property 28 June 1974
    The Law Commission Working Paper No 54 Criminal Law Offences of Entering and Remaining on Property 28 June 1974 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 40p net N.B. This Working Paper, completed for publication on 17 April 1974, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. The Law Commission will be grateful for comments before 1 January 1975 All correspondence should be addressed to: J. C. R. Fieldsend, Law Commission, Conquest House, 37 138 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1 N 2BQ (Tel: 01 -242 0861, Ext. 47) With the Secretary’s Compliments LAW COMMI SSlO N Conquest House, 37/38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WC1 N 2BQ Tel. 01-242 0861 Ext. 14 The Law Commission Working Paper No 54 Criminal Law Offences of Entering and Remaining on Property 28 June 1974 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1974 0 Crown copyright 7974 ISBN 0 11 730085 3 17-26-18 THE LAW COMMISSION WORKING PAPER NO. 54 CRIMINAL LAW OFFENCES OF ENTERING AND REMAINING ON PROPERTY Table of Contents Paras. I INTRODUCTION 1-7 1 I1 FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER 8 -22 4 Common Law 8-9 4 The Forcible Entry Acts 1381-1623 10-15 5 Analysis of the present law 16-22 7 I11 CONSPIRACY TO TRESPASS 23-32 12 IV PROPOSALS FOR REFORM 33-63 17 Introductory 33-35 19 A new entry offence 36-45 19 (a) Entering 40 21 (b) Property 41 22 (c) Force 42-43 22 (a) Without lawful.
    [Show full text]
  • Millan Report on the Review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984
    New Directions New Directions Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984 Report on the of Review the You can get further copies of the full report from: The Stationery Office Bookshop Mail, Telephone and Fax Orders Report on the Review of the 71 Lothian Road Edinburgh EH3 9AZ Phone: 0870 606 5566 Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984 Fax: 0870 606 5588 Also available on computer disc from: Public Health Division 1.4 Room 3es St Andrews House Regent Road Edinburgh EH1 3DG Phone: 0131 244 2451 Fax: 0131 244 5076 £25.00 Web site: www.scotland.gov.uk/millan Related publications: An Evaluation of Section 18 of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984. Review of Literature Relating to Mental Health Legislation. Copies available from The Stationery Office Bookshop at £5.00 each. Designed and produced by Tactica Solutions 1/2001 B17767 Chairman: Rt. Hon. Bruce Millan SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE REVIEW OF THE MENTAL HEALTH (SCOTLAND) ACT 1984 Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers January 2001 SE/2001/56 REVIEW OF THE MENTAL HEALTH (SCOTLAND) ACT 1984 CONTENTS Membership of the Committee ix-x Terms of Reference xi Summary of work xii-xiii Acknowledgements xiv Introduction to the Report xv-xviii SECTION 1 FRAMEWORK OF A NEW MENTAL HEALTH ACT Chapter 1 - The need for reform Introduction 3 Changes in mental health care 3 - 5 Changes in legislation 5 - 7 Problems with the 1984 Act 7 - 9 Chapter 2 - The scope of a new Mental Health Act Is a Mental Health Act necessary? 10 - 11 Views of consultees 11 What the new Act should contain 12 - 13 Interaction
    [Show full text]
  • English Law (Application) 1962-17
    English Law (Application) 1962-17 ENGLISH LAW (APPLICATION) ACT Principal Act Act. No. 1962-17 Commencement 1.6.1962 Assent 31.5.1962 Amending Relevant current provisions Commenceme enactments nt date Acts. 1965-18 Schedule. 1970-24 Schedule. Part II 1971-19 Schedule. Part I 1972-01 Schedule. Part I 1972-04 – 1972-06 – 1972-13 Schedule. Part I 1972-15 Schedule. Part I 1973-18 Schedule. Part II 1973-25 section.6 1973-31 Schedule. Part II 1973-34 Schedule. Part II LN. 1976/113 – Acts. 1977-02 Schedule. Part II LN. 1979/026 Schedule. Part I Acts. 1983-45 Schedule. Parts I and III 19.12.1983 1983-48 section. 2(2) and Schedule. Part I 31.12.1983 2009-25 Schedule. Part I 9.7.2009 2011-23 Schedule. Part III [items 15 & 18] 23.11.2012 English sources None cited © Government of Gibraltar (www.gibraltarlaws.gov.gi) 1962-17 English Law (Application) Appendices These appendices are printed without legislative authority. It should not be assumed that they are either complete or correct. Appendix 1: Acts of the Parliament at Westminster that extend to Gibraltar or have been applied by Order in Council. Appendix 2: Acts of the Parliament at Westminster that have been disapplied since 1 June 1962. Appendix 3: Matters of common law that have been abolished in Gibraltar since 1 June 1962. _____________________________ ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Section 1. Short title. 2. Application of common law and equity. 3. Application of English Acts. 4. Amendment of English Acts. 5. Disapplication by resolution of the Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • File on Demand
    FILE ON DEMAND Dear Sir/Madam, There are several issues caetaris paribus that have arisen to the attention of the international community that make it necessarily impossible for my acting sovereign being to comply with your commands in order to remain within my law which is my Bible that I received at my Christening on the 7th February 1970 which evidenced a Birth Certificate provided by receipt of a copy of an entry. Firstly you have been invoiced for the sum of £50 for continuing to send correspondence via the Universal Postal Union under Swiss Federal Law presuming authority under any corporate heading other than that of the Vatican. The fifty pounds is levied since the content of your communication caused me to raise my eyebrows as noted in my schedule [terms included]. Another charge is levied for £250,000 for the necessity of my supplying you with this letter that you are reading (the original copy of which I hold for proof of authenticity) also noted in my schedule. Since the One Peoples Public Trust foreclosed the corporate system run by the Rothschild dynasty et al on the 25th December 2012 following the Paradigm Report; thereby leaving only the Vatican intact as a trusted corporation, there has now been ample time for the ceasing of such claims with neither current corpus delicti nor locus standi, nor either the mens rea or actus reus demonstrated by me to you for any indictments. The Triffin Dilemma has manifested a state of slavery within the global monetary system wherein the fictitious debts of fiat values are repaid by the blood & sweat of the common people prompting the reinstitution of Common Law Authorities worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Conspiracy and Criminal Law Reform
    The Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 76) CRIMINAL LAW REPORT ON CONSPIRACY AND CRMNAL LAW aEFORM Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3 (2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 17th March 1976 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 176 €2.45 net The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Cooke, Chairman. Mr. Aubrey L. Diamond. Ivlr. Stephen Edell. Mr. Derek Hodgson, Q.C. Mr. Norman S. Marsh, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. J. M. Cartwright Sharp and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. 11 CONTENTS Paragraph Page INTRODUCTION A. GENERAL . 1 1 B. SCOPE OF REPORT 7 2 PART I: CONSPIRACY A. THENEED FOR AN OFFENCE OF CONSPIRACY . 1.1 3 B. THEOBJECTIVE OF CONSPIRACY . 1.7 5 1. The present law . 1.7 5 2. Working Party’s consideration and proposals . 1.8 6 3. Difficulty of implementation . 1.10 -8 (a) Conspiracy to defraud . 1.14 10 (b) Offences against the administration ofjustice 1.17 11 C. THEELEMENTS OF CONSPIRACY . 1.20 11 1. Introduction 1.20 11 2. The agreement . 1.21 12 3. Corporations . 1.24 12 4. The mental element . 1.25 13 (a) Introduction . 1.25 13 (b) The mental element in relation to the agreement itself . 1.26 13 (c) The mental element in respect of the objective .
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Act 1961
    Reprint as at 12 March 2019 Crimes Act 1961 Public Act 1961 No 43 Date of assent 1 November 1961 Commencement see section 1(2) Contents Page Title 21 1 Short Title, commencement, etc 21 2 Interpretation 22 3 Meaning of convicted on indictment [Repealed] 27 4 Meaning of ordinarily resident in New Zealand 27 4A Transitional, savings, and related provisions 27 Part 1 Jurisdiction 5 Application of Act 28 6 Persons not to be tried in respect of things done outside New 28 Zealand 7 Place of commission of offence 28 7A Extraterritorial jurisdiction in respect of certain offences with 28 transnational aspects 7B Attorney-General’s consent required where jurisdiction claimed 30 under section 7A 8 Jurisdiction in respect of crimes on ships or aircraft beyond New 31 Zealand Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. This Act is administered by the Ministry of Justice. 1 Reprinted as at Crimes Act 1961 12 March 2019 8A Jurisdiction in respect of certain persons with diplomatic or 32 consular immunity 9 Offences not to be punishable except under New Zealand Acts 34 10 Offence under more than 1 enactment 34 10A Criminal enactments not to have retrospective effect 35 10B Period of limitation [Repealed] 35 11 Construction of other Acts [Repealed] 35 12 Summary jurisdiction [Repealed] 35 Part 2 Punishments 13 Powers of courts under other Acts not affected 35 Death [Repealed] 14 Form of sentence in capital
    [Show full text]