DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared For: Prepared By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared For: Prepared By NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Watino Crossover and Calais Extension Pipeline Project August 2010 / 6889/6890 APPENDIX 3 AQUATIC ASSESSMENT BY TERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Page A3-1 AQUATIC ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. WATINO CROSSOVER AND CALAIS EXTENSION PIPELINE PROJECT August 2010 6889/6890 Prepared for: Prepared by: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited Calgary, Alberta. TERA Environmental Consultants Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Ph: 403-265-2885 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Aquatic Assessment Watino Crossover and Calais Extension Pipeline Project August 2010 - 6889/6890 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description.............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Fish Community ..................................................................................................................5 1.4 Regulatory Framework........................................................................................................ 6 1.5 Scope of Work..................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Field Crew Structure and Traditional Ecological Knowledge.............................................. 8 2.2 Aquatic Habitat Assessment ............................................................................................... 8 2.3 Fish Community ..................................................................................................................9 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Watercourse Crossing along the Proposed Watino Crossover ........................................ 10 3.1.1 Traditional Ecological Knowledge Results........................................................... 10 3.1.2 Aquatic Habitat Results........................................................................................ 10 3.1.3 Fish Investigations ............................................................................................... 11 3.2 Watercourse Crossing along the Proposed Calais Extension .......................................... 11 3.2.1 Aquatic Habitat Results........................................................................................ 11 3.2.2 Fish Investigations ............................................................................................... 11 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................. 15 4.1 Recommendations for the Proposed Watino Crossover................................................... 15 4.1.1 Pipeline Crossing Methods .................................................................................. 15 4.1.2 Recommended Temporary Vehicle and Equipment Crossing Methods.............. 15 4.2 Recommendations for the Proposed Calais Extension .................................................... 19 4.2.1 Recommended Pipeline Crossing Methods......................................................... 19 4.2.2 Recommended Vehicle and Equipment Crossing Methods ................................ 19 5.0 MITIGATION .................................................................................................................................. 21 5.1 Mitigation for Trenchless Pipeline Crossings.................................................................... 22 5.2 Mitigation for an Isolated Pipeline Crossing...................................................................... 22 5.3 Mitigation for Dry or Frozen to Bottom Open Cut Pipeline Crossings .............................. 23 5.4 Mitigation for Vehicle and Equipment Crossings .............................................................. 24 5.5 Mitigation for Navigable Watercourses ............................................................................. 24 6.0 SUMMARY/CLOSING.................................................................................................................... 26 7.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 27 7.1 Personal Communication.................................................................................................. 27 7.2 Literature Cited.................................................................................................................. 27 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Watercourse Site Record for the Proposed Watino Crossover .......................................A-1 Appendix B Watercourse Site Record for the Proposed Calais Extension .........................................B-1 Page i NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Aquatic Assessment Watino Crossover and Calais Extension Pipeline Project August 2010 - 6889/6890 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Location of the Proposed Watino Crossover Pipeline ......................................... 3 Figure 2 Regional Location of the Proposed Calais Extension Pipeline........................................... 4 Figure 3 Fish Symbol Map for Watercourse Crossings along the Proposed Watino Crossover Pipeline............................................................................................................ 17 Figure 4 Fish Symbol Map for Watercourse Crossings along the Proposed Calais Extension Pipeline............................................................................................................. 18 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Fish Species that Occur in the Smoky River Near the Proposed Watino Crossover and Little Smoky River Near the Proposed Calais Extension ........................... 5 Table 2 Summary of Water Quality Parameters and Mean Channel Characteristics.................... 12 Table 3 Fish Habitat Potential Ratings for Watercourses Crossed by the Proposed Pipeline Routes................................................................................................................. 13 Table 4 Fish Sampling Results for Watercourses Crossed by the Proposed Pipeline Routes............................................................................................................................... 14 Table 5 Summary of Recommended Pipeline and Vehicle/Equipment Crossing Methods for Watercourses Crossed by the Proposed Pipeline Routes............................ 16 Page ii NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Aquatic Assessment Watino Crossover and Calais Extension Pipeline Project August 2010 - 6889/6890 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL), a wholly owned subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited (TransCanada), is applying to the National Energy Board (NEB) under Section 58 of the NEB Act for authorization to construct and operate the proposed Watino Crossover and Calais Extension Pipeline Project (the Project). The proposed Watino Crossover pipeline route (Figure 1) will be constructed from the existing Heart River Lateral Pipeline in 13-22-77-25 W5M to the existing Watino Meter Station in 2-14-77-25 W5M. The pipeline components of the proposed Watino Crossover will consist of 4.3 km of new sweet gas pipeline (NPS 4). The construction right-of-way will be 15 m wide, with additional temporary workspace required at select locations to accommodate construction activities. Pending regulatory approval, construction is scheduled to commence November 1, 2010 with an on-stream date of January 1, 2011. The proposed Calais Extension pipeline route (Figure 2) will be constructed from the existing Valleyview Compressor Site in 9-9-69-22 W5M to the existing Calais Meter Station in 15-16-69-22 W5M. The pipeline components of the proposed Calais Extension will consist of 2.5 km of new sweet gas pipeline (NPS 4). The construction right-of-way will be 15 m wide, with additional temporary workspace required at select locations to accommodate construction activities. Pending regulatory approval, construction is scheduled to commence November 1, 2010 with an on-stream date of January 1, 2011. This document describes the methods and results of the aquatic habitat assessments and fisheries investigations that NGTL contracted TERA Environmental Consultants (TERA) to perform as part of NGTL’s regulatory requirements. This report also discusses how TERA and the communities of the Duncan’s First Nation and Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation worked collaboratively to identify and document aboriginal traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) at each watercourse crossing. 1.2 Study Area The Project is located in the Dry Mixedwood Natural Subregion of the Boreal Forest Natural Region (Natural Regions Committee 2006). Topography in this subregion has undulating plains and hummocky uplands. Most of the landscape has been cultivated. Vegetation is characterized by aspen forests with shrubby understories in wet areas, and white spruce and jack pine in dry areas. Land use in this Subregion includes: forestry; oil and gas; coal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park
    A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park David W. Mayhood Part 3 of a Fish Management Plan for Jasper National Park Freshwater Research Limited A Preliminary Assessment of the Native Fish Stocks of Jasper National Park David W. Mayhood FWR Freshwater Research Limited Calgary, Alberta Prepared for Canadian Parks Service Jasper National Park Jasper, Alberta Part 3 of a Fish Management Plan for Jasper National Park July 1992 Cover & Title Page. Alexander Bajkov’s drawings of bull trout from Jacques Lake, Jasper National Park (Bajkov 1927:334-335). Top: Bajkov’s Figure 2, captioned “Head of specimen of Salvelinus alpinus malma, [female], 500 mm. in length from Jaques [sic] Lake.” Bottom: Bajkov’s Figure 3, captioned “Head of specimen of Salvelinus alpinus malma, [male], 590 mm. in length, from Jaques [sic] Lake.” Although only sketches, Bajkov’s figures well illustrate the most characteristic features of this most characteristic Jasper native fish. These are: the terminal mouth cleft bisecting the anterior profile at its midpoint, the elongated head with tapered snout, flat skull, long lower jaw, and eyes placed high on the head (Cavender 1980:300-302; compare with Cavender’s Figure 3). The head structure of bull trout is well suited to an ambush-type predatory style, in which the charr rests on the bottom and watches for prey to pass over. ABSTRACT I conducted an extensive survey of published and unpublished documents to identify the native fish stocks of Jasper National Park, describe their original condition, determine if there is anything unusual or especially significant about them, assess their present condition, outline what is known of their biology and life history, and outline what measures should be taken to manage and protect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(S): J
    Exploration in the Rocky Mountains North of the Yellowhead Pass Author(s): J. Norman Collie Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Mar., 1912), pp. 223-233 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1778435 Accessed: 12-06-2016 07:31 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Wiley, The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 155.69.24.171 on Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:31:04 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms EXPLORATION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. 223 overtures to Bhutan and Nepal, which have been rejected by these states, and I am very glad they have been. The Chinese should not be allowed on the Indian side of the Himalayas. The President : We will conclude with a vote of thanks to Mr. Rose for his excellent paper. EXPLORATION IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS NORTH OF THE YELLOWHEAD PASS.* By J. NORMAN OOLLIE, Ph.D., LL.D., F.R.S., F.R.G.S., etc. The part of the Koeky mountains, that run north through what is now the Dominion of Canada, have only in the last twenty-five years been made accessible to the ordinary traveller.
    [Show full text]
  • Wapiti River Water Management Plan Summary
    Wapiti River Water Management Plan Summary Wapiti River Water Management Plan Steering Committee February 2020 Summary The Wapiti River basin lies within the larger Smoky/Wapiti basin of the Peace River watershed. Of all basins in the Peace River watershed, the Wapiti basin has the highest concentration and diversity of human water withdrawals and municipal and industrial wastewater discharges. The Wapiti River Water Management Plan (the Plan) was developed to address concerns about water diversions from the Wapiti River, particularly during winter low-flow periods and the potential negative impacts to the aquatic environment. In response, a steering committee of local stakeholders including municipalities, Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation, industry, agriculture, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and the Mighty Peace Watershed Alliance (MPWA), supported by technical experts from Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP), was established. The steering committee initiated the development of a water management plan that includes a Water Conservation Objective (WCO) and management recommendations for the Wapiti River basin from the British Columbia border to its confluence with the Smoky River. A WCO is a limit to the volume of water that can be withdrawn from the Wapiti River, ensuring that water flow remains in the river system to meet ecological objectives. The Plan provides guidance and recommendations on balancing the needs of municipal water supply, industry uses, agriculture and other uses, while maintaining a healthy aquatic ecosystem in the Alberta portion of the Wapiti River basin. Wapiti River Water Management Plan | Summary 2 Purpose and Objectives of the Plan The Plan will be provided as a recommendation to AEP and if adopted, would form policy when making water allocation decisions under the Water Act, and where appropriate, under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act by establishing a WCO for the Wapiti River.
    [Show full text]
  • BYLAW NO. 20-850 of the Municipal District of Greenview No. 16
    BYLAW NO. 20-850 of the Municipal District of Greenview No. 16 A Bylaw of the Municipal District of Greenview No. 16, in the Province of Alberta to establish the ward boundaries within the M.D of Greenview and the number of Councillors elected to represent each ward. WHEREAS, Section 143(4) of the Municipal Government Act enables a Council to pass a bylaw specifying the number of Councillors to serve on the Council of a Municipal District; and WHEREAS, Section 148(2) of the Municipal Government Act enables a Council to pass a bylaw to establish ward boundaries for its municipality, including the number of wards and number for each ward in the M.D. of Greenview; and WHEREAS, Section 148(5) of the Municipal Government Act enables a Council to pass a bylaw requiring each Councillor to be nominated by ward and that each Councillor shall serve as the Councillor for the ward in which they were nominated; and NOW THEREFORE, under the authority and subject to the provisions of the Municipal Government Act, the Council of the M.D. of Greenview No. 16, in the Province of Alberta enacts as follows: 1. Title 1.1 This bylaw shall be cited as the “Municipal Ward Boundaries and Council Composition”. 2. Definitions a. Greenview means the municipal corporation of the M.D. of Greenview No. 16. b. Local Authorities Election Act means the Local Authorities Election Act, R.S.A 2000, Chapter L-21. 3. Greenview shall be divided into nine (9) Wards. 4. The number and designation of each Ward shall be as described herein and as per Schedule ‘A’, and shall exclude all incorporated municipalities, as well as Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation and Alexander First Nation situated therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Soil Survey of the Peace River-High Prairie-Sturgeon Lake
    PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Research Council of Alberta. Report No. 31. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. SOIL SURVEY DIVISION Preliminary Soi1 Survey of The Peace River-High Prairie- Sturgeon Lake Area BY F. A. WYATT Department of Soils University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta (Report published by the University of Alberta at the request of Hon. Hugh W. Allen, Minister of Lands and Mines) 1935 Price 50 cents. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. , DR. R. C. WALLACE, Director of Research, Resedrch Cowuil of Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Sir:- 1 beg to submit a report entitled “Preliminary Soi1 Survey of the Peace River-High Prairie-Sturgeon Lake Area,” prepared in co- operation with Dr. J. L. Doughty, Dr. A. Leahey and Mr. A. D. Paul. A soi1 map in colors accompanies this report. This report is compiled from five adjacent surveys c,onducted between the years 1928 and 1931. It includes a11 of two and parts of the other three surveys. The area included in the report is about 108 miles square with McLennan as the approximate geographical tenter. Respectfully submitted, F. A. WYATT. Department of Soils, University of, Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, April 15th, 1935. .-; ‘- TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Description of area ...............................................................................................................................................1 Drainage ........................................................................................................................................................................2 Timber
    [Show full text]
  • Watino – Smoky River – Flood Hazard Study – Summary
    Flood Hazard Identification Program Watino – Smoky River – Flood Hazard Study – Summary Community Hamlet of Watino Birch Hills County Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 Stream Smoky River Basin Peace River – 7G This study delineates flood hazard areas and determines design flood levels along an approximate 8 km reach of the Smoky River through Watino and surrounding area. The design discharge for the Smoky River is 12700 m³/s. The Smoky River watershed includes mountain, foothill and plains regions. Flooding within the study area typically occurs during the open water season as a result of heavy rainfall events, either alone or combined with snowmelt runoff. Annual peak flows can be expected between April and August, but the highest flows are most likely to occur in June. A digital representation of the flood hazard maps prepared as part of this study can be viewed online. • Watino Flood Hazard Mapping For more information regarding specific flood hazards in your community, please contact Alberta Environment and Parks by email at [email protected]. Flood Hazard Study Details Study Status Final Report Name Watino Flood Risk Mapping Study Report Author Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta Report Date July 1996 Flood information available after study completion may not be reflected in the current flood hazard study report or flood hazard mapping. To obtain a PDF copy of the current report or mapping in PDF format, please contact Alberta Environment and Parks by email at [email protected]. Instructions on how to obtain official GIS flood hazard mapping data, or more information on the Flood Hazard Identification Program and flood hazard studies in Alberta, are available online.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 9A Hydrogeological Baseline Report
    Proposed HR Milner Expansion Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report Appendix 9A: Hydrogeological Baseline Report Appendix 9A Hydrogeological Baseline Report Maxim Power Corp. Page 9A-1 January 2009 REPORT TO MAXIM POWER CORPORATION and ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT HYDROGEOLOGICAL BASELINE REPORT, HR MILNER GENERATING STATION, NEAR GRANDE CACHE, ALBERTA PROJECT NO.: PR08-04 Prepared By July 28, 2008 Executive Summary Maxim Power Corporation (MAXIM) is currently in the process of a major expansion of their existing HR Milner thermal power generating station located approximately 20km north east of Grande Cache, Alberta. The HR Milner Generating Station and facilities are located in the north half of Section 10 and the south half of Section 15, Township 58, Ranges 7 and 8, West of the 6th Meridian. The expansion will require a number of initiatives including the development of both a baseline environmental assessment and an environmental impact assessment. This section provides the hydrogeological information requested in Section 4.3.1 of Alberta Environment’s (AENV) April 8, 2008 Draft Terms of Reference. Impact assessment and monitoring/mitigation components are provided in Section 9 of the Impact Assessment Report. The HR Milner Generating Station is located on a flood plain terrace on the northwest bank of the Smoky River immediately down-gradient from the Grande Cache Coal Corporation’s Coal Processing Plant. The terrace that underlies the Station is approximately five metres above river elevation. Surface drainage is toward the Smoky
    [Show full text]
  • Information Package Watercourse
    Information Package Watercourse Crossing Management Directive June 2019 Disclaimer The information contained in this information package is provided for general information only and is in no way legal advice. It is not a substitute for knowing the AER requirements contained in the applicable legislation, including directives and manuals and how they apply in your particular situation. You should consider obtaining independent legal and other professional advice to properly understand your options and obligations. Despite the care taken in preparing this information package, the AER makes no warranty, expressed or implied, and does not assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. For the most up-to-date versions of the documents contained in the appendices, use the links provided throughout this document. Printed versions are uncontrolled. Revision History Name Date Changes Made Jody Foster enter a date. Finalized document. enter a date. enter a date. enter a date. enter a date. Alberta Energy Regulator | Information Package 1 Alberta Energy Regulator Content Watercourse Crossing Remediation Directive ......................................................................................... 4 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 4 How the Program Works .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • LITTLE SMOKY LANDSLIDE, ALBERTA Corey R
    CHARACTERIZING COMPLEX DEEP SEATED LANDSLIDE DEFORMATION USING CORNER REFLECTOR INSAR (CR-INSAR): LITTLE SMOKY LANDSLIDE, ALBERTA Corey R. Froese Alberta Geological Survey, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, [email protected] Valentin Poncos1, Roger Skirrow2, Mohamed Mansour3, Derek Martin3 1Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing, Ottawa, Ontario 2Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation, Edmonton, Alberta 3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, RÉSUMÉ Les glissements de terre rétrogressifs et profonds le long des parois de la vallée de la rivière Little Smoky, dans le nord- ouest de l'Alberta, ont mené à un entretien continu notable sur l’autoroute 49 au cours des 50 dernières années. Bien que les zones de vitesse plus élevées localisées aient résulté en une enquête et une surveillance spécifiques du site, les configurations de déformation générales des parois de la vallée restent difficiles à comprendre. Des études précédentes et une reconnaissance du champ ont mis l’accent sur une série de glissements plus actifs et plus récents, en superposition sur des glissements moins actifs et plus anciens, menant à la complexité des modèles de déformation et de vélocité. Puisque la végétation est importante sur ce site, une série de 18 réflecteurs à écho renforcé satellitaires ont été construits et installés sur les parois, le long des deux côtés de la vallée, à l’automne 2006 de sorte à fournir une série de sources ponctuelles où les déformations de niveau subcentimétrique peuvent être mesurées avec un niveau de confiance élevé au moyen de la technologie InSAR. La première année des données a démontré des tendances manifestes des réflecteurs à se déplacer dans la ligne de visée du satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Trout Conservation Management Plan 2012-2017
    Bull Trout Conservation Management Plan 2012 - 2017 Alberta Conservation Management Plan No. 8 Bull Trout Conservation Management Plan 2012 -2017 Prepared by: Kerry Rees, Isabelle Girard, Dave Walty and David Christiansen March 2012 Publication No.: 1/604 ISBN: 978-1-4601-0230-5 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 978-1-4601-0231-2 (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1922-9976 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1922-9984 (On-line Edition) Cover photos: Daryl Wig, David Christiansen For copies of this report, contact: Fish and Wildlife Division Alberta Sustainable Resource Development 2nd Floor, 9920 108 St. Edmonton, Alberta Canada T5K 2M4 OR Visit our web site at: http://srd.alberta.ca/BioDiversityStewardship/SpeciesAtRisk/Default.aspx This publication may be cited as: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development 2012. Bull Trout Conservation Management Plan 2012 - 17. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Species at Risk Conservation Management Plan No. 8. Edmonton, AB, 90 pp. ii PREFACE Albertans are fortunate to share their province with a diversity of wild species. A small number of these species are classified as Species of Special Concern because they have characteristics that make them particularly sensitive to human activities or natural events. Special conservation measures are necessary to ensure that these species do not become Endangered or Threatened. Conservation management plans are developed for Species of Special Concern to provide guidance for land and resource management decisions that affect the species and their habitat. These plans are intended to be a resource tool for Sustainable Resource Development - Fish and Wildlife Division (SRD-FWD) and for provincial and regional land and resource management staff. Conservation management plans provide background information including species biology, threats to species and habitat, and inventory/monitoring history.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region
    AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region AREA Chief Economist https://albertare.configio.com/page/ann-marie-lurie-bioAnn-Marie Lurie analyzes Alberta’s resale housing statistics both provincially and regionally. In order to allow for better analysis of housing sales data, we have aligned our reporting regions to the census divisions used by Statistics Canada. Economic Region AB-NW: Athabasca – Grande Prairie – Peace River 17 16 Economic Region AB-NE: Wood Buffalo – Cold Lake Economic Region AB-W: 19 Banff – Jasper – Rocky Mountain House 18 12 Economic Region AB-Edmonton 13 14 Economic Region AB-Red Deer 11 10 Economic Region AB-E: 9 8 7 Camrose – Drumheller 15 6 4 5 Economic Region AB-Calgary Economic Region AB-S: 2 1 3 Lethbridge – Medicine Hat New reports are released on the sixth of each month, except on weekends or holidays when it is released on the following business day. AREA Housing Statistics by Economic Region 1 Alberta Economic Region North West Grande Prairie – Athabasca – Peace River Division 17 Municipal District Towns Hamlets, villages, Other Big Lakes County - 0506 High Prairie - 0147 Enilda (0694), Faust (0702), Grouard Swan Hills - 0309 (0719), Joussard (0742), Kinuso (0189), Rural Big Lakes County (9506) Clear Hills – 0504 Cleardale (0664), Worsley (0884), Hines Creek (0150), Rural Big Lakes county (9504) Lesser Slave River no 124 - Slave Lake - 0284 Canyon Creek (0898), Chisholm (0661), 0507 Flatbush (0705), Marten Beach (0780), Smith (0839), Wagner (0649), Widewater (0899), Slave Lake (0284), Rural Slave River (9507) Northern Lights County - Manning – 0212 Deadwood (0679), Dixonville (0684), 0511 North Star (0892), Notikewin (0893), Rural Northern Lights County (9511) Northern Sunrise County - Cadotte Lake (0645), Little Buffalo 0496 (0762), Marie Reine (0777), Reno (0814), St.
    [Show full text]