DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision Special

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision Special Customer journal no. 74 – II/2014 REVISION SPECIAL In this special summer edition of our DQS UL customer journal, our experts present to you the ongoing status of the revision of ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 (the current BSOH 18001), as well as information on the new ISO 27001, BRC Issue 7 and an overview of Food Standards. 2015 – The year of revised management system standards For more than 1.5 million organizations with certified quality we recommend our customers famil- or environmental management systems worldwide, the year iarize themselves with the changed 2015 will bring significant changes: both ISO 9001 (Quality standards as soon as possible, and Management Systems) and ISO 14001 (Environmental not to wait until the end of the transi- Management Systems) are scheduled to be re-published in tion period. Your local DQS UL office completely revised versions in the second half of the year. will be glad to support you in this, and offers their customers and interested Both standards look back on a true success story: since the parties a wealth of information and initial publication of ISO 9001 in the year 1987, the number practical assistance in the form of of certified organizations has been increasing steadily, and the training seminars and “Gap analyses“ . recently published ISO Survey reveals the impressive figure of 1,129,000 certificates for management systems at the end of With this newsletter, we would like to let you know about the 2013. The certificate numbers for environmental management current status of this ongoing revision, and give you a heads-up systems according to ISO 14001 show a similar development, about the changes that are in the planning. and by the end of 2013 there were more than 300,000 certifi- Enjoy the news! cates worldwide. Michael Drechsel Managing Director Organizations certified by DQS UL Group report many advantages DQS Holding GmbH their certification gives them, starting with the fulfillment of customer requirements, to using them as tools to improve company or environmental performance, or to avoid mistakes and reduce risk. contents no. 74 Still, changing conditions, new developments and technologies as well as changing expectations expressed by the users of these ISO 9001 2 standards have made another revision necessary. ISO 14001 4 The new standards will have a completely new, mutually harmo- ISO 45001 6 nized structure that is designed to facilitate integration of these ISO/IEC 27001 7 two management systems. Content-wise, the tried and true process approach that to date has been recommended is now a BRC Food Standard 9 requirement. There is also increased emphasis on the effective- The Fairway Golf & Spa Resort obtains 10 ness of the management system and the results achieved. GC-Mark “Excellent Business Hotel” This provides certified organizations with some impressive oppor- China office of DQS UL Group 11 tunities to improve their systems, and develop them further into moves to new location even more effective tools for management. To do that, they now have a transition period of three years to adjust their systems to the new requirements. In spite of this rather long period of time, 2 no.74 ISO 9001 Roadmap ISO 9001:2015 Background 2013 2014 2015 Since its first publication ISO 9001 went through several revisions to keep it June 2013: CD up-to-date and to consider the changing (Committee Draft) environment and stakeholder expecta- Transition period for certification tions. It was first published in 1987 May 2014: DIS containing a set of requirements grouped (Draft International Standard) in 20 elements for quality assurance system. The first revision followed in July 2015: FDIS 1994, introducing some minor changes (Final Draft International Standard) like the distinction between corrective and preventive action. The revision in the September 2015: IS year 2000 introduced a completely new (International Standard) concept, abandoning the element-based requirements and introducing a Quality Management Model based on a process approach. Again a revision followed in the standard was necessary again to The revision process 2008 with very few changes without assure that the standard is still relevant In 2011 the responsible ISO committee, adding or changing requirements. and adequate in an always faster changing the Technical Committee 176 started the world. The increasing diversity of ISO 9001 systematic review and decided in March ISO 9001 is the most successful standard users had to be considered, not having 2012 to revise the standard. The revision for management systems in the world. any longer only manufacturing industries process went through several internal While in 1995 only 127,000 organiza- but more and more service industries draft stages and is now expected to be tions have been certified according to and other kinds of organizations. It was concluded in September 2015 with the ISO 9001, this number increased in 2013 also necessary to verify the impact of publication of the revised ISO 9001:2015, to more than 1,100,000 certificates in new developments in knowledge and based on a new common structure for all 180 countries. technologies which changed during the ISO Management System Standards and last years, broader user interests and introducing several new concepts, the Despite the innumerous benefits changes in industry. In 2010 and 2011, most important being the so called “risk obtained through an implemented quality ISO conducted an extensive web-based based thinking”. management system based on ISO 9001 user survey, asking about the need for a (e.g. error prevention, reduced costs revision and the future needs and interests through improved and more efficient of the standard users. The answers have processes, minimization of business been evaluated and the majority asked for risks, increased customer satisfaction, changes and a review of ISO 9001. trust and reputation), a new revision of In June 2014 the most recent step was concluded and the DIS (Draft Interna- tional Standard) was published for public consultation. no.74 3 Transition period ISO 9001 Impact for certified organizations: 2015 2016 2017 2018 First of all it is important that there is no formal requirement to start any activity before the publication of ISO 9001. However, as the DIS, the Draft International Standard, is now published, September 2015: we already have a clear picture how the Published revised standard will look like. So far we International Standard recommend the monitoring of the revision September 2015: process and making yourself aware of the Start of 3 years transition period until September 2018 new structure and the new requirements as soon as possible. After the final publication of ISO 9001:2015, certified New content and structure: The revised standard will also give organizations will need to transition to Even keeping in mind that the final increased emphasis to achieving value the revised standard. That means that version may still introduce some minor for the organization and its customers. processes and system documentation will adjustments, now the main changes and Important are the results, in other have to be revised and aligned with the concepts are already defined: words “output matters”. new requirements. It is already known that ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9001:2015 will require an will have a complete new structure and understanding of the context of the core text with the so called “High Level organization and the needs and Structure” as defined in the Annex SL of expectations of interested parties the “Consolidated ISO Supplement” of like e.g. direct clients or customers, the ISO/IEC Directives. end users, suppliers or regulators. The advance of modern media will As one of the main content changes, be reflected by increased flexibility the new standard will increase the of the use of documentation, and requirements for top management the terms “document” and “record” commitment and involvement. probably will be substituted by the term Another significant change will be the “documented information”. introduction of the concept of “risk The process approach introduced in based thinking”. While the concept the year 2000 as the desired model of risk has always been implicit in for quality management systems will ISO 9001, the revised standard makes become an explicit requirement in it more explicit and builds it into the ISO 9001:2015. whole management system. Annex ISO and the International Accreditation “Preventive action” will disappear as SL includes a specific requirement Forum IAF already agreed on a period of that organizations determine the risks an explicit requirement, and the whole wording of the revised standard will three years for the transition from ISO that need to be addressed to ensure 9001:2008 to the new ISO 9001:2015. that their management system can make it more readily applicable and DQS UL will support organizations by achieve its intended outcomes, prevent usable by “service” type organizations. or reduce undesired effects and Recognizing the importance of different means, among others by: achieve continual improvement. Each competent people within any kind Publicly available information management system standard can of organization there will be also Recorded webinars in several languages define risk in terms that are relevant to more emphasis on requirements for (on our website www.dqs-ul.com) competence of personnel. In that their specific discipline; so the revised Seminars and training version of ISO 9001 will do so in relation context, competence means being able Gap audits to product or service conformity and to apply knowledge and skill to achieve customer satisfaction. Risk based intended results. thinking will make preventive action As an annex of the standard we will also part of the routine and it will no longer find the revised quality management be necessary to maintain a specific principles, now reduced from eight to requirement for preventive action.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Closer Look at Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting: a Worldwide Sector Analysis
    A CLOSER LOOK AT GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING: A WORLDWIDE SECTOR ANALYSIS Abstract This study analyses the worldwide diffusion of the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) Sustainability Report in all economic sectors from 1999-2011. The logistic curve model (s-shaped curve) is used to assess the current situation on both a global scale and a local scale. Additionally, instability and concentration indices are used to analyse whether the diffusion process developed in a homogeneous manner across economic sectors. Close attention has been paid to the two leading sectors worldwide, although for different reasons: the financial and energy sectors. Findings suggest that energy sector has adopted GRI reporting in an effort to be more sustainable as being more visible, polluting and international. On the other hand, the financial sector could regain market credibility and attract new investors, and GRI reporting could help it to construct a new identity defined by legitimate behaviours and an improved image The paper concludes with some reflections on the usefulness of these reports and trends. Key Words: Global Reporting Initiative; GRI; sustainability reporting; sustainability reporting diffusion; stakeholders; sustainable development; environmental policy. A CLOSER LOOK AT GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING: A WORLDWIDE SECTOR ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION Currently, information beyond what is available in financial statements is crucial for companies to maintain a trusting relationship with their stakeholders (Krajnc and Glavic, 2005; Gilbert and Rache, 2007; Alonso-Almeida, 2009). In the past two decades, environmental and social concerns have continuously been increasing (Melé et al., 2006; Skouloudis et al., 2009). Even governments have started applying greater pressure on companies to be more compliant with regulations or recommendations (Delmas and Toffel, 2008; Prado-Lorenzo et al., 2009; Delmas and Montes- Sancho, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • On a Shared Mission UL Sustainability Report 2019 on a Shared Mission UL Sustainability Report 2019
    On a shared mission UL Sustainability Report 2019 On a shared mission UL Sustainability Report 2019 In 2019, UL celebrated 125 years of working for a safer, more secure and sustainable world. As our work continues, we recognize that our mission to progress the safety, security and sustainability of our world is a call to all who hope to protect our planet, its people and the prosperity of future generations. In our first sustainability report, we share our story with the belief that by revealing our successes and challenges we will add insights to the collective journey toward a thriving, abundant future for all. 3 UL’s sustainability purpose goes beyond addressing Our services and offerings. We help our customers CEO message the effects of climate change. As an independent implement their visions of a sustainable world, as safety science company with a 125-year legacy of well, by supporting transparency in supply chains and UL has been working for a safer world proven results we must do more and demand more sourcing, enabling environmental health and safety, since 1894. That was our founding mission of ourselves than that. We must help pave the way and promoting a circular economy that replenishes 125 years ago, and that mission still excites forward to a self-sustaining world. and reuses the natural resources we rely on. Safety and engages all of us. I don’t believe continues to be our priority through our work to there could be a higher purpose than Safety, security and sustainability are interconnected. support the responsible development of resilient, endeavoring to make the world a safer, They pose similar risks and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • 45001-Bureau Veritas-HZ-En.Cdr
    C E R T I F I C A T E Management system as per ISO 45001 : 2018 The Certification Body TÜV NORD CERT GmbH hereby confirms as a result of the audit, assessment and certification decision according to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, that the organization Bureau Veritas 8, cours du Triangle 92800 Puteaux France with the locations according to the annex 2 operates a management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO45 001 : 201 8 and will be assessed for conformity within the 3 year term of validity of the certificate. Scope Please see scope annex 1 Certificate Registration No. 44 126 160145 Valid from 2021-01-25 Audit Report No. 35xx xxxx Valid until 2022-01-31 Initial certification 2010 (BS OHSAS 18001) Certifcation Body Essen, 2021-01-25 at TÜV NORD CERT GmbH Validity can be verified at https://www.tuev-nord.de/de/unternehmen/zertifizierung/zertifikatsdatenbank. TÜV NORD CERT GmbH Langemarckstraße 20 45141 Essen www.tuev-nord-cert.com . ANNEX 1 to Certificate Registration No. 44 126 160145 ISO 45001 : 2018 Bureau Veritas 8, cours du Triangle 92800 Puteaux France Scope - CIF DIVISION • INDUSTRY (IND) Conformity assessment of industrial equipment and installations to regulatory or client specifications from feasibility stage to de-commissioning. Services include design review, shop inspection, site inspection, asset integrity management, product certification, training and related testing services such as non-destructive testing, verification, analysis, monitoring, assessment, supervision. Advanced & Conventional Non Destructive Testing Services(Onshore & Offshore), Third Party Vendor Inspection Services, NDT Training & Certification Services, Risk Based Inspection, Quality Assurance and Quality Control Services such as Inspection, Assessment & Surveys of Materials, Equipment, Plants, Pipeline During and After Construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Sustainability Reporting
    Introduction to sustainability reporting Meeting the needs of multiple stakeholders Introduction To be effective, sustainability management must be a part of every aspect of a business including innovation, business strategy, operations, product and risk. It includes grappling with challenges such as supply chain complexity, innovation safety, full production life cycle visibility and brand management. Gone are the days of a siloed sustainability team acting separate to core business functions. In today’s world, sustainability is front and center in value creation. sustainability Introduction to governance reportinggovernance Environment, social and As the definition of companies’ role in society has changed, moving from maximizing shareholder value to more holistic definitions of multistakeholder value. A range of new partners, suppliers, consumers and other collaborators increase complexity. ONLY 40% A good example of this is in the supply chain. Gaining visibility into the environmental impact of a product from conception through end-use and of companies disposal can be a daunting task involving dozens of players. In a survey from reporting Carbon UL, Unpacking Supply Chain Complexity1, 68% of respondents classified their with highly complex supply chain as “somewhat to very complex.” Only 40% of companies with highly complex supply chains indicate they have high visibility into their supply supply chains indicate chain. they have HIGH and safety reporting Environment, health The good news is that companies are more aware of these challenges and are taking steps to address them. VISIBILITY into In this guide, we will define and discuss various forms of sustainability their supply chain. reporting, their significance for organizations and important points to consider.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Accountability International and the SA8000
    1 Copyright 2007. No quotation or citation without attribution. IR/PS CSR Case #07-15 Social Accountability International and the SA8000 By: Angelica Hagman GRADUATE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND PACIFIC STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Prepared for Professor Peter Gourevitch Edited by Jennifer Cheng, MPIA 2008 Corporate Social Responsibility Fall 2007 2 Copyright 2007. No quotation or citation without attribution. Table of Contents I. Introduction...........................................................................................................................3 II. What is the CSR Problem?..................................................................................................3 III. Social Accountability International ...................................................................................3 IV. Social Accountability 8000 .................................................................................................4 V. Why adopt the SA8000?.......................................................................................................6 A. Costs...................................................................................................................................6 B. Benefits...............................................................................................................................7 VI. Causes for Concern...........................................................................................................12 A. Cause for Concern #1: SA8000 Accreditation
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Children and Your Brand Reputation UL TOY SAFETY and QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES
    Protecting Children and Your Brand Reputation UL TOY SAFETY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES About UL Consumer & Retail Services UL is dedicated to helping manufacturers, suppliers and retailers delight children with safe, quality toys. Our offerings provide clarity to the complex processes of creating, producing, and bringing toys to the global market. Our knowledge, worldwide network of accredited laboratories, and dedicated team provide the support and expertise necessary to successfully meet regulatory demands and protect brand reputation. UL’s comprehensive suite of services include safety testing to global standards, quality assurance inspections, responsible sourcing and solutions that deliver critical business intelligence. We help our customers to mitigate the risks associated with global sourcing to protect your brand reputation and build consumer loyalty. Working together, we can reduce business complexity, mitigate risk, bring increased trust to the entire value chain and better protect our children. We’re with you every step of the way, from design to shelf to empower trust in a complex world. Home > About UL (1 of 2) Selection of active memberships and affiliations • US Toy Industry Association (TA) • ASTM International (ASTM) • UK Baby Products Association (BPA) • International Federation of Inspection Agencies (IFIA) • British Toy and Hobby Association (BTHA) • International Council of Toy • Italian Toy Association (ASSOGIOCATTOLI) Industries (ICTI) • China Toy Association (CTA) • Human Factors & • Toy Association of India
    [Show full text]
  • Item 05 – Public Comments on GRI 102: About the Organization in the Universal Standards Exposure Draft
    Barbara Strozzilaan 336 1083 HN Amsterdam The Netherlands [email protected] Item 05 – Public comments on GRI 102: About the Organization in the Universal Standards exposure draft For GSSB discussion Date 06 November 2020 Meeting 19 November 2020 Project GRI Universal Standards Project Description This document contains an extract of public comments related to GRI 102: About the Organization received on the Universal Standards exposure draft, which was made available for public comment between 11 June and 9 September 2020. The document presents the comments received via the online survey and via letters, for GSSB reference. It does not present an analysis of the feedback – the analysis will be presented by the Standards Division directly at the meeting. The GSSB is kindly asked to review the document ahead of the meeting and to share any questions about the comments or highlight any comments for discussion, with the Standards Division by 17 November. Note to reading the comments: Comments have been included verbatim. Where a respondent has raised several distinct points in one comment, each point has been numbered and presented in a separate row. The point number is indicated in brackets before the verbatim comment. In addition to this, comment numbers have been included in the first column to help facilitate the discussion during the meeting on 19 November. This document has been prepared by the GRI Standards Division. It is provided as a convenience to observers at meetings of the Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB), to assist them in following the Board’s discussion. It does not represent an official position of the GSSB.
    [Show full text]
  • Working for a Safer, More Sustainable Future
    The world runs on trust Working for a safer, more sustainable future 2019 ANNUAL REPORT At UL, we are endlessly curious. We use science to substantiate trust. We ask the hard ContentsContents questions, and we test, inspect, audit, certify and verify to find the 04 Progression, protection and sustainability right answers. We A message from Jennifer Scanlon, president and chief executive officer, UL work to enable smarter decision making 06 Organization overview and life-enhancing technologies aimed at 08 Our year in review creating prosperity and 11 Progression well-being for all. Evolving our capabilities 17 Protection Making the world safer 23 Sustainability Creating a better future 29 Leadership Board of directors and company leadership 02 | Progression, protection and sustainability A message from Jennifer Scanlon, president and chief executive officer, UL To our employees, customers factors in autonomous vehicles, from wire certification and advisory activities of UL, We view the future vision of UL through the and cable to advanced medical devices. In the for-profit entity. Since then, we at UL lens of opportunity. We pursue the safety of and stakeholders the process, we’ve helped ensure that our have made 47 acquisitions. Today, we are our customers’ new-to-the-world technologies customers can keep their brand promises. driving efficiency through our operations via our Connected Technologies segment and delivering the highest quality services while we creatively apply technology to our For 125 years, UL has helped to make the UL is much more than our history. to our customers. Working with customers Retail and Industry segment to help ensure world a safer place.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS PROGRAM MANUAL Revised June 2019
    INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS PROGRAM MANUAL Revised June 2019 © Disney 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 4 II OVERVIEW OF GENERAL ILS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 5 III DISNEY CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MANUFACTURERS AND 7 THE MINIMUM COMPLIANCE STANDARD IV SOURCING RESTRICTIONS 10 V FACILITY DECLARATION AND AUTHORIZATION 12 VI ILS AUDITS 17 VII REMEDIATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE 25 VIII FACILITY LOSS OF PRODUCTION AUTHORIZATION 27 IX DISCLOSURE OF ILS AUDITS AND FACILITIES 29 X DISNEY’S ILS ETHICS POLICY 30 APPENDIX 32 A1 APPENDIX 1: Glossary of Terms 33 A2 APPENDIX 2: Frequently Asked Questions 35 A3 APPENDIX 3: Disney Code of Conduct for Manufacturers 39 A4 APPENDIX 4: Examples of Minimum Compliance Standard (MCS) Violations 41 A5 APPENDIX 5: Social Compliance Monitoring Organizations 43 A6 APPENDIX 6: Reference List of Social Compliance Consultants 45 A7 APPENDIX 7: Better Work Program Participation and Instructions 47 A8 APPENDIX 8: Permitted Sourcing Countries (PSC) 49 A9 APPENDIX 9: Facility and Merchandise Authorization (FAMA) Application 51 A10 APPENDIX 10: Sample Facility and Merchandise Authorization (FAMA) 53 A11 APPENDIX 11: Sample Code of Conduct Assessment Notification (COCAN) 54 A12 APPENDIX 12: Sample ILS Audit Agenda 55 A13 APPENDIX 13: Sample ILS Audit Records Checklist 56 A14 APPENDIX 14: Sample Corrective Action Plan 60 A15 APPENDIX 15: Sample Facility Loss of Production Authorization Letter 61 A16 APPENDIX 16: Sample Monthly Status Report 62 A17 APPENDIX 17: Sample FAMA Revocation Letter 64 A18 APPENDIX 18: Sample FAMA Revocation —UTS Letter (Unable to Schedule) 65 2 i | INTRODUCTION THE INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS PROGRAM APPLIES TO THE PRODUCTION OF PRODUCTS, PRODUCT COMPONENTS, AND MATERIALS IN PHYSICAL FORM containing, incorporating, or applying any intellectual property owned or controlled by The Walt Disney Company or its affiliates (“Disney”) produced for any purpose anywhere in the world (“Disney-branded products”).
    [Show full text]
  • Quality, Environmental, Health and Safety Manual Toshiba
    DocuSign Envelope ID: A4D7E65B-8DDA-4F23-8C71-B418081277F7 Toshiba International Corporation Quality, Environmental, Health and Safety Manual Doc. No. 2M-421-001 Rev. 24 (05/24/21) DocuSign Envelope ID: A4D7E65B-8DDA-4F23-8C71-B418081277F7 QEHS Manual Doc. No. 2M-421-001 Title: Written or Revised by: Revision No.: Maribel Abella, Joel Sanchez, 24 Table of Contents and Cross Reference Anna Herrera and Adam Gaspard Approved By: Effective Date: May 21, 2021 Ford CSR for UL CTDP ISO IATF ISO ISO 45001: Section IATF ISO/IEC Title 9001:2015 16949:2016 14001:2015 2018 No 16949:2016 17025:2017 Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Assistance CEO, VP and 1 General Manager 5.1.1 - - - - - Statement 1.0, 4.0, 1.0, 4.3.1, 1, 4.1, 4.2, 1.0, 4.3, 4.4, QEHS Management 7.5, 5.2, 4.4, 7.5, 5.2, 4.3, 5.2, 5.3, 1, 4.1, 4.2, 2 7.5.2, 5.2, 6.2 8 Systems 6.2 6.2 6.2, 7.1, 7.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5.2 7.3, QEHS Management 4.1, 4.2, 6.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.4, 3 6.1 6.0 6.0, 6.1.2.3 N/A Systems Planning 6.2 6.1, 6.2 Management 5.1, 7.1, 5.1, 7.1, 5.1, 7.1, 5.1, 5.2,5.3, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 4 5 Responsibility 7.4 7.1.3.1, 7.4 7.1.3.1, 7.4 7.1, 7.4 7.1, 7.4 QEHS Organizational 5 5.3 5.3 5.3, 5.3.1 5.3, 7.4 5.3, 7.4 6 Responsibilities 9.3, 9.3.1.1, 6 Management Review 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 8.9 9.3.2 4.3, 5.2, 5.2, 6.1, 6.1,6.2, 7.2, Documentation 6.2.1,7.2, 7 7.5 7.5 7.5, 7.5.2 7.5, 8.2, 9.1, 8.2, 8.3 Requirements 7.4, 7.5, 8.1, 9.2, 9.3, 8.2, 9, 10.2 10.2, 10.3 5.3, 7.1, 7.2, 8 Resource Management 7.1 7.1 7.1, 7.1.3.1 7.1 6.2 7.3 8.2, 8.2.1, 8.2.3.1.2, 8.2.3.1.3, 9 Product Realization 8.1 8.2, 8.3 8.3, 6.1.3, 8.1 8.1.4 N/A 8.3.1.1, 8.3.2.1, 8.3.2.2, 8.3.4 Customer-Related 10 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.4 8.1.3, 8.1.4 N/A Processes 8.2, 8.2.1, 8.2.3.1.2, 8.2.3.1.3, 11 Design and Development 8.3 8.2, 8.3 8.3, 8.1 8.1.3, 8.1.4 N/A 8.3.1.1, 8.3.2.1, 8.3.2.2, 8.3.4 8.4, 8.4.1.2, 8.4.1.3, 12 Purchasing 8.4 8.4 8.4.2.1, 8.1 8.1.4 N/A 8.4.2.2, 8.4.2.3, 8.4.2.4 Production and Service 6.1, 7.5.3, 13 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.1, 8.2 N/A Provision 8.1 This document shall be considered “For Reference Only” when printed as a hardcopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Members by Country
    Community Members by Country Country Organization Name Sector Join Date Website Reason for joining Andorra FEDA Energy Utilities 25/02/2008 http://www.feda.ad To be in this organization to present GRI report Argentina AG SUSTENTABLE Commercial Services 10/02/2008 http://www.agsustentable.com Nuestra firma busca convertirse en una consultora especializada en asesorar, gerenciar y auditar la implementación de políticas y estrategias de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial. Bancor - Banco de la Provincia de Córdoba Financial Services 14/04/2015 CEGCEN Non-Profit / Services 09/01/2017 http://www.cegcengroup.com Because many years ago we began to take actions towards a sustainable community in our state and country and we are interested in GRI Gold Community benefits. Grupo Sancor Seguros Financial Services 23/10/2013 Vista Oil and Gas SAB de CV Energy 24/08/2020 METHODOLOGY SELECTED FOR THE COMPANY TO REPORT ESG PROGRESS Australia ACI Global Non-Profit / Services 12/12/2014 http://www.aciglobal.com.au Australian Ethical Investment Ltd Financial Services 11/03/2003 https://www.australianethical.com.au/ Australian Ethical Investment Ltd was established in 1986 for the purpose of pooling investor savings, specialising in environmental and socially responsible investment. Australian Ethical manages four public trusts and corresponding superannuation strategies. Investments promoting ecologically sustainable and socially just enterprises are selected using the ‘Australian Ethical Charter’. April 2004 Consult Urth Other 09/09/2020 We are helping businesses create sustainability reporting CPA Australia Non-Profit / Services 06/11/2006 https://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/ Growthpoint Properties Australia Limited Real Estate 10/10/2018 http://www.growthpoint.com.au Next Level Sustainability 21/02/2018 https://nextlevelsustainability.com/ I am a longstanding follower of GRI and want to be a member of the Stakeholder Council.
    [Show full text]
  • SA8000 Accredited Certification Bodies
    About SAAS Our Services Our Clients Resources Our Initiatives Registered Users Only Home » Resources » SA8000 Accredited Certification Bodies SA8000 Accredited Certification Bodies Certification Bodies (CBs) are third party auditing firms that audit facilities against a specific international standard or code. CBs assess companies to the SA8000 standard and present a report on compliance to the facilities they audit on the performance criteria that need to be met in order to obtain certification. When choosing a CB to undertake an SA8000 audit, you will need to understand the differences between an accredited and unaccredited certificate to ensure the report and associated SA8000 certificate will meet your needs. To become an accredited CB, the audit company must undergo a rigorous initial and ongoing assessment process. This process is in place to ensure the certification audit is conducted in accordance with the requirements for performing the SA8000 audit. The evaluation process by SAAS assesses the competence of the audit team, the audit methodology used by the CB, and the quality control procedures in place to ensure a properly executed audit and subsequent report. By selecting a SAAS-accredited Certification Body, you know the audit will be performed properly and in accordance with the SAAS standards. About CBs are authorized by SAAS to perform certifications of compliance to SA8000 and other verification codes within the SAAS scope of accreditation. A third party auditing scheme requires compliance by the CB itself to a set of institutional criteria and elaborate auditing requirements. For SA8000, this includes requirements for auditor training, auditor qualifications, audit day tables prescribing the required number of audit days, guidelines for stakeholder engagement, living wage calculation, and other such requirements for obtaining and maintaining accreditation for conducting SA8000 audits.
    [Show full text]