Autumn 2017 Newsletter No
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
FFerr A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report March 2016 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Project no: B2074900 Document title: Option Assessment Report Document No.: B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 Revision: 0 Date: 17 March 2016 Client name: Highways England Client no: Project manager: Simon Beaney Author: Robert Benson Jacobs U.K. Limited 1180 Eskdale Road Winnersh, Wokingham Reading RG41 5TU United Kingdom T +44 (0)118 946 7000 F +44 (0)118 946 7001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 29/01/2016 Draft for client review RB SM/DW SB 1 17/03/2016 Final RB TB SB B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 i A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of report ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Overview of assessment ............................................................................................................................ -
Microbiological Examination of Water Contact Sports Sites in the River Thames Catchment I989
WP MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER CONTACT SPORTS SITES IN THE RIVER THAMES CATCHMENT I989 E0 E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE K10 House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West. Almondsbury, Bristol RS32 4UD BIOLOGY (EAST) BIOLOGY (WEST) THE GRANGE FOBNEY MEAD CROSSBROOK STREET ROSE KILN LANE WALTHAM CROSS READING HERTS BERKS EN8 8lx RG2 OSF TEL: 0992 645075 TEL: 0734 311422 FAX: 0992 30707 FAX: 0734 311438 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ■ tin aim 042280 CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 2 RESULTS 7 DISCUSSION 18 CONCLUSION 20 RECOMMENDATIONS 20 REFERENCES 21 MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER CONTACT SPORTS SITES IN THE RIVER THAMES CATCHMENT 1989 SUMMARY Water samples were taken at sixty-one sites associated with recreational use throughout the River Thames catchment. Samples were obtained from the main River Thames, tributaries, standing waters and the London Docks. The samples were examined for Total Coliforms and Escherichia coli to give a measure of faecal contamination. The results were compared with the standards given in E.C. Directive 76/I6O/EEC (Concerning the quality of bathing water). In general, coliform levels in river waters were higher than those in standing waters. At present, there are three EC Designated bathing areas in the River Thames catchment, none of which are situated on freshwaters. Compliance data calculated in this report is intended for comparison with the EC Directive only and is not statutory. Most sites sampled complied at least intermittently with the E.C. Imperative levels for both Total Coliforms and E.coli. -
Parks, People and Nature
Parks, People and Nature A guide to enhancing natural habitats in London’s parks and green spaces in a changing climate Natural England works for people, places and nature to conserve and enhance biodiversity, landscapes and wildlife in rural, urban, coastal and marine areas. We conserve and enhance the natural environment for its intrinsic value, iithe wellbeing and enjoyment of people, and the economic prosperity it brings. Parks, People and Nature A guide to enhancing natural habitats in London’s parks and green spaces in a changing climate Introduction My vision for London is of a green city, and a fair city, where everyone has access to a high quality green space in which wildlife can be encountered close to where they live and work. London has some of the Ýnest parks of any capital city in the world. Yet it also has some areas lacking in green space, and many more where the quality of the green spaces could be better. This booklet provides a valuable practical guide on how to improve access to nature in parks and green spaces, complimenting my London Plan Implementation Report on Improving LondonersÔ access to nature. Appropriate design and management of our parks and green spaces will be one of the key challenges that will enable the City to adapt to climate change. Park managers need to be working now to plant the trees that will provide shade for a much warmer city in the 2080s. We also need to start thinking now how our parks can help in addressing broader environmental challenges such as Þood risk management. -
Sowing the Seeds: Reconnecting London's Children with Nature
Sowing the SeedS Reconnecting London’S chiLdRen with natuRe novembeR 2011 Sowing the SeedS: Reconnecting London’S chiLdRen with natuRe copyRight Greater London Authority November 2011 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall, The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-471-5 Cover photo © WWT / photo by Debs Pinniger 3 Sowing the SeedS Reconnecting London’S chiLdRen with natuRe novembeR 2011 a RepoRt foR the London SuStainabLe deveLopment commission by tim gill Sowing the SeedS: Reconnecting London’S chiLdRen with natuRe contentS foRewOrd by John Plowman 5 executive SummaRy 7 one INTRODUCTION 13 two Why doeS chiLdRen’S engagement with natuRe matteR? 19 thRee London-baSed initiatives 23 four AnaLySiS: issueS, oppoRtunitieS and challenges 31 five RecommendationS: how to Reconnect London’S chiLdRen with natuRe 45 Six ConcLuSion 53 appendices 55 Appendix one: Fieldwork 55 Appendix two: Notes to Table 2 57 Appendix three: Measuring progress 59 Appendix four: Feedback on draft recommendations 63 Endnotes 69 5 foRewoRd by John Plowman Enormous progress has been made in recent This report is not a direct response to the rioting, years to improve the protection and provision of but it is relevant. It suggests that giving children green space in London. We need to ensure that access to nature promotes their mental and these green spaces do not lie idle. In investigating emotional well-being and may have a positive this, we decided to focus on the experiences effect on the behaviour of some children. While of children under 12. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2016, London
London Register 2016 HERITAGE AT RISK 2016 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 20 Croydon 21 Ealing 24 Enfield 27 Greenwich 30 Hackney 34 Hammersmith and Fulham 40 Haringey 43 Harrow 47 Havering 50 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 64 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 81 Lambeth 82 Lewisham 91 London Legacy (MDC) 95 Merton 96 Newham 101 Redbridge 103 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 108 Sutton 116 Tower Hamlets 117 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2016 he Heritage at Risk Register in London reflects the diversity of our capital’s historic environment. It includes 682 buildings and sites known to be at risk from Tneglect, decay or inappropriate development - everything from an early 18th century church designed by Nicholas Hawksmoor, to a boathouse built during WWI on an island in the Thames. These are sites that need imagination and investment. In London the scale of this challenge has grown. There are 12 more assets on the Heritage at Risk Register this year compared to 2015. We also know that it’s becoming more expensive to repair many of our buildings at risk. In the face of these challenges we’re grateful for the help and support of all those who continue to champion our historic environment. -
Cycle Routes in Enfield
9'.9;0*#6(+'.& $41:$1740' CREWS HILL Holmesdale Tunnel Open Space Crews Hill Whitewebbs Museum Golf Course of Transport Capel Manor Institute of Lea Valley Lea Valley Horticulture and Field Studies *'465/'4' Sports Centre High School 20 FREEZYWATER Painters Lane Whitewebbs Park Open Space Aylands Capel Manor Primary School Open Space Honilands Primary School Bulls Cross Field Whitewebbs Park Golf Course Keys Meadow School Warwick Fields Open Space Myddelton House and Gardens Elsinge St John's Jubilee C of E Primary School Freezywaters St Georges Park Aylands C of E Primary School TURKEY School ENFIELD STREET LOCK St Ignatius College RC School Forty Hall The Dell Epping Forest 0%4 ENFIELD LOCK Hadley Wood Chesterfield Soham Road Forty Hill Primary School Recreation Ground '22+0) Open Space C of E Primary School 1 Forty Hall Museum (14'56 Prince of Wales Primary School HADLEY Hadley Wood Hilly Fields Gough Park WOOD Primary School Park Hoe Lane Albany Leisure Centre Wocesters Open Space Albany Park Primary School Prince of Oasis Academy North Enfield Hadley Wales Field Recreation Ground Ansells Eastfields Lavender Green Primary School St Michaels Primary School C of E Hadley Wood Primary School Durants Golf Course School Enfield County Lower School Trent Park Country Park GORDON HILL HADLEY WOOD Russet House School St George's Platts Road Field Open Space Chase Community School St Michaels Carterhatch Green Infant and Junior School Trent Park Covert Way Mansion Queen Elizabeth David Lloyd Stadium Centre ENFIELD Field St George's C of E Primary School St James HIGHWAY St Andrew's C of E Primary School L.B. -
Q.1 How Often Do You Visit a Park Or Open Space in Barnet?
A1744 BarnetBarnet OSSOSS CitizensCitizens Pannel Panel SummarySummary Report Q.1 How often do you visit a park or open space in Barnet? Every day Never visit 0% 5% Most days Once a year 21% 2% Two or three times a year 14% Once a month 17% Once or twice a week 28% Once every two weeks 13% No % of total Never visit 37 5.2 Once a year 15 2.1 Two or three times a year 98 13.9 Once a month 122 17.3 Once every two weeks 91 12.9 Once or twice a week 198 28.1 Most days 144 20.4 Every day 0 0.0 A1744A1744 Barnet Barnet OSS OSS Citizens Citizens Panel Pannel Summary Summary Report Report Q.2 Could you please tell us why you don’t visit parks and open spaces in the borough, could you please tell us why. 35 29.7% 30 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 25 20 15 10.8% 10.8% 10 8.1% 8.1% 5.4% 5.4% 5 0 I do not have I am not I do not feel Barnet’s parks Barnet’s parks Barnet’s parks My health is too There is no I prefer to visit Other time interested in safe visiting and open and open and open poor suitable public parks and open them them spaces do not spaces are not spaces are not transport to get spaces outside offer facilities I easy to get to well maintained to them the borough want No % of total I do not have time 11 29.7 I am not interested in them 3 8.1 I do not feel safe visiting them 10 27.0 Barnetʼs parks and open spaces do not offer faci 4 10.8 Barnetʼs parks and open spaces are not easy to 3 8.1 Barnetʼs parks and open spaces are not well ma 2 5.4 My health is too poor 10 27.0 There is no suitable public transport to get to the 2 5.4 I prefer to visit parks and open spaces outside th 4 10.8 Other 10 27.0 Total responses (as per Q1) 37 Other: I feel uncomfortable visiting parks and open spaces alone not that I don't have a dog. -
4 Denleigh Gardens, Winchmore Hill, London N21 1HZ 4 Denleigh Gardens, Winchmore Hill, London N21 1HZ
4 Denleigh Gardens, Winchmore Hill, London N21 1HZ 4 Denleigh Gardens, Winchmore Hill, London N21 1HZ A stylish and contemporary newly constructed home located in this premier North London location. Bespoke and unique, high quality living with some lovely details throughout • Stunning modern home located just off Winchmore Hill Green • Close to Grovelands Park, the train station and some great local restaurants • Gated private parking for several cars • Surprisingly spacious living space arranged over three levels “A rare opportunity to acquire this stylish modern home with character in one of the best residential areas of North London – village living yet within striking distance of the City”. 6 bedrooms • 3 reception rooms • 5 bathrooms • 3 of which ensuite • gated entrance • garage • off street parking Description This beautifully presented Located in Winchmore Hills home offers a high standard conservation area and close to of décor and some fabulous Grovelands Park with its entertainment spaces. The attractive lake, woods and spacious entrance hallway open spaces. provides access to a large Winchmore Hill mainline drawing room which is a triple station is within easy reach aspect room with bi fold doors being situated in Winchmore onto the garden and a feature Hill Green, which is locally period style fireplace surround known as ‘The Village’. From with inset wood burning stove. here there is a regular service The kitchen is fitted with a into Moorgate. Southgate range of high end appliances, underground station (Piccadilly a breakfast bar, wine cooler Line) is about 1 mile away. and also enjoys an aspect over The M25 provides links to the patio and garden. -
London Borough of Enfield
London Borough of Enfield List of Highways (Public and Private) and Public Rights of Way December 2020 Edition This document fulfils the requirement of the Highways Act 1980, Section 36 for Enfield Council to maintain and make publicly available a list of the streets within the Borough which are highways maintainable at the public expense. It also fulfils the requirements of Section 53 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 in respect of maintaining a statement of public paths and ways. As far as possible this document has been checked for accuracy, however any errors or omissions can be raised by emailing: [email protected] Please note that the A10 and A406 roads are the responsibility of Transport for London so any enquiries as to their status should be directed to them. Page 1 of 282 Changes Since the Previous Edition Roads Stopped Up Name Postcode Location Classified Date of Remarks Change (if known) DANE ROAD N18 3PR Entire road from rear of No Nov-20 Public highway footway at junction with stopped up under Pegamoid Road to rear of s247 to facilitate footway at junction with development. Princes Road. Originally created 06/05/1950. FAIRFIELD CLOSE EN3 Entire Road starting from rear No Nov-20 Public highway of footway at junction with stopped up under Scotland Green Road North s247 to facilitate development. Originally created 01/06/1906. Will become private road. NICHOL CLOSE N14 5PB Entire road starting from rear No Nov-20 Public highway of footway on Chase Road. stopped up under s247 to facilitate development. -
AECOM Report South Central Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan 2017-03-30
North Central Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan Stage 3 Interventions Paper Consultation Draft 6th January 2020 – 30th March 2020 North Central Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council Prepared by: AECOM AECOM Limited AECOM House 63-77 Victoria Street St Albans Hertfordshire AL1 3ER UK T: +44(0)1727 535000 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council AECOM North Central Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 6 Report Structure .................................................................................................................... 7 2. North Central Hertfordshire.......................................................................... 9 3. Vision and Objectives .................................................................................. 12 The NC GTP Vision ............................................................................................................ -
Mid Beds Green Infrastructure Plan Process
Contents Foreword 4 Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 6 1.0 Introduction 10 1.1 Need for the Plan 10 1.2 Policy Background 11 1.3 What is Green Infrastructure? 12 1.4 Aim & Objectives 13 2.0 Context 14 2.1 Environmental context 14 2.2 Growth context 15 3.0 The Plan Preparation Process 18 3.1 Baseline Review 18 3.2 Stakeholder & Community Consultation 19 3.3 Integration Process 20 3.4 The Green Infrastructure Network 20 3.5 Project Lists 21 4.0 Network Area Descriptions and Project List 24 4.1 Forest of Marston Vale 24 4.2 The Ivel Valley 29 4.3 The Greensand Ridge 33 4.4 The Flit Valley 34 4.5 The Southern Clay Ridge and Vale 35 4.6 The Chilterns 36 5.0 Implementation 38 5.1 Introduction 38 5.2 Project Prioritisation 38 5.3 Delivering through the Planning System 38 5.4 Agriculture & Forestry 40 5.5 Local Communities 40 5.6 Partner Organisations 40 5.7 Funding 41 5.8 Monitoring & Review 41 6.0 Landscape 43 7.0 Historic Environment 57 8.0 Biodiversity 64 9.0 Accessible Greenspace 77 10.0 Access Routes 86 Appendices 96 1 Bedfordshire and Luton Green Infrastructure Consortium Members 97 2 Existing GI Assets on Base Maps 98 3 Themes Leaders 99 4 Workshop Results and Attendees 100 5 Potential Criteria for Prioritising GI Projects 126 6 Landscape 128 Appendix 6a – Table of Valued Landmarks, Views and Sites Appendix 6b – Condition of Landscape Character Areas 7 Historic Environment 131 Appendix 7a Historic Environment Character Areas in Mid Bedfordshire 8 Accessible Greenspace 140 8a. -
Mid Bedfordshire Green Infrastructure Plan
Contents Foreword 4 Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 6 1.0 Introduction 10 1.1 Need for the Plan 10 1.2 Policy Background 11 1.3 What is Green Infrastructure? 12 1.4 Aim & Objectives 13 2.0 Context 14 2.1 Environmental context 14 2.2 Growth context 15 3.0 The Plan Preparation Process 18 3.1 Baseline Review 18 3.2 Stakeholder & Community Consultation 19 3.3 Integration Process 20 3.4 The Green Infrastructure Network 20 3.5 Project Lists 21 4.0 Network Area Descriptions and Project List 24 4.1 Forest of Marston Vale 24 4.2 The Ivel Valley 29 4.3 The Greensand Ridge 33 4.4 The Flit Valley 34 4.5 The Southern Clay Ridge and Vale 35 4.6 The Chilterns 36 5.0 Implementation 38 5.1 Introduction 38 5.2 Project Prioritisation 38 5.3 Delivering through the Planning System 38 5.4 Agriculture & Forestry 40 5.5 Local Communities 40 5.6 Partner Organisations 40 5.7 Funding 41 5.8 Monitoring & Review 41 6.0 Landscape 43 7.0 Historic Environment 57 8.0 Biodiversity 64 9.0 Accessible Greenspace 77 10.0 Access Routes 86 Appendices 96 1 Bedfordshire and Luton Green Infrastructure Consortium Members 97 2 Existing GI Assets on Base Maps 98 3 Themes Leaders 99 4 Workshop Results and Attendees 100 5 Potential Criteria for Prioritising GI Projects 126 6 Landscape 128 Appendix 6a – Table of Valued Landmarks, Views and Sites Appendix 6b – Condition of Landscape Character Areas 7 Historic Environment 131 Appendix 7a Historic Environment Character Areas in Mid Bedfordshire 8 Accessible Greenspace 140 8a.