DOCSLIB.ORG

Opinions of Campers and Boaters at the Allegheny Reservoir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opinions of Campers and Boaters at the Allegheny Reservoir Opinions of Campers and Boaters at the Allegheny Reservoir USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER NE-307 1974 NORTHEASTERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION FOREST SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 6816 MARKET STREET, UPPER DARBY, PA. 19082 F. BRYAN CLARK, STATION DIRECTOR WEAUTHORS GEORGE H. MOELLER is a research forester with the USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Sta- tion's research project at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York. He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in forest economics from Southern Illinois University and studied social research methods at the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research. He joined the Forest Service in September, 1965, and has served at the Syracuse recreation project since March, 1968, RODNEY G. LARSON is the recreation staff officer on the Allegheny National Forest, ?Varren, Pennsylvania. He has a B.S. degree in Forestry Management from the University of Minnesota. His experience with the U.S. Forest Service since 1960 covers a range of resource management assignments in land use, land acquisition, administration, information and education, and outdoor recreation programs and planning. DOUGLAS A. MORRISON is a research associate with the School of Environmental and Resource Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. He holds a PhD. degree in resource management from the University of Oregon. Since joining the college in 1969, he has conducted research in the social and psychological principles gover~ingleisure behavior. The study reported here was carried out and funded as pa.rt of the graduate recreation studies program at the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry at Syracuse, N.Y. MANUSCRIPTRECEIVED FOR PUBLICATION 2 APRIL1974 Opinions of Campers and Boaters at the Allegheny Reservoir by George H. Moeller Rodney G. Larson Douglas A. Morrison ABSTRACT Interviews with 157 campers and 281 boaters near the Allegheny reservoir on the Allegheny National Forest re- vealed that their perceptions of management problems differed from those of managers. Different users had different atti- tudes toward recreation use controls, fee policies, recreation zoning, law enforcement, and facility development needs. This diversity indicates that changes in recreation management policy will not affect all recreation users equally; their impact will depend on how active the users are, the number of activi- ties they participate in, and how familiar they are with the area. Fiqure I. - Sarnp,ling locations Ig he !ny Reservoir, nal Forest. Parties Sampled CAMPGROUNDS 1. Kiasutha. ......53 2. Red Bridge. .....30 3. Dew Drop. ......38 4. Willow Bay. .....15 Total 136 ] PENNSYLVANIA ( Pittsburgh Harrisbura BOAT LAUNCH SITES 5. Wolf Run Marina ...60 6. Kiasutha. ......76 7. Dew Drop. ......53 8. Willow Bay. .....59 9. Roper Hollow. ....33 Total 281 THE STUDY PROBLEM State. At normal summer pool, the reservoir is 27 miles long and has 91 miles of shoreline. Recreation resource managers are con- Most of the land around the Pennsylvania fronted with the problem of managing fixed portion of the reservoir is administered by resources for growing recreation needs. the U. S. Forest Service as part of the Alle- Management programs must be developed to gheny National Forest. Others with vested balance conflicting recreation demands equit- management responsibilities include the U. S. ably while, at the same time, maintaining Army Corps of Engineers, Seneca Nation of the integrity of the natural resource, Indians, New York State Department of En- Recreation management decisions continue vironmental Conservation, Cattaragus Coun- to be made without adequate knowledge of ty, New York, and various private land- the recreation user, his attitudes, and his owners. opinions of management policies and problem The Forest Service has developed 17 rec- solutions. Past research has shown that re- reation areas on or directly adjacent to the source managers are not always able to per- reservoir. These provide for a wide range of ceive objectively management policies that recreational activities that include boating, are acceptable to recreation users (Hendee swimming, camping, picnicking, and sight- and Hccrris 1 9 70). seeing. Information about facilities and The purpose of this study was to provide services is provided through a centrally resource managers and planners with infor- located Forest Service information center mation about the attitudes and opinions of near the Kinzua Dam. The capacity of de- recreation users. Interviews were conducted veloped recreation facilities was increased with campers and boaters near the Allegheny from 2,480 people at one time in 1966 to reservoir in the Allegheny National Forest, 13,460 in 1972. in northwestern Pennsylvania. The results The Allegheny Reservoir has the potential of this study should provide recreation man- to be a major recreation attraction. It is agers elsewhere with better information on within 1 day's drive for over 80 million peo- which to base critical management decisions. ple (fig. 1). Since 1966, when the reservoir Although some recreation management prob- and recreation adjacent facilities opened, lems concern a particular area, many prob- recreation use has increased from 91,900 to lems discussed in this study- overuse of approximately 772,600 visitor-days per year2 facilities, control of resource use, law en- Projections are that recreation use could forcement, facility development, and user reach 5 million visitor-days by the year 2000.2 fees-are common to other heavily used rec- reation areas. THE STUDY AREA 1 A visitor-day consists of 12 user-hours, which may be aggregated continuously, intermittently, or simul- The Kinzua Dam in northwestern Pennsvl- taneously by One Or persons- 2 Projection obtained from 1972 Reservoir Manage- vania' '.' east of Pennsyl- ment Plan. The possibility of reaching the projected vania, impounds the 12,080 acre Allegheny level depends on many companion factors such as im- Reservoir, 7,634 acres of which are in Perm- proved road systems, program funding, and recreation facility development by government and private in- sylvania and the remainder in New York terests. STUDY METHOD tivities, with fishing and visiting scenic over- looks as the most comn~on. Visitors were sampled at four developed The average boater respondent was 41 campgrounds and five boat-launching sites. years old and had 2 years of college. His They were selected on 20 randomly selected $11,150 median annual family income ex- weekend days and eight weekdays during ceeded the current national median by $650. June, July, and August, 1971. The self- He tended to work in a managerial or related designated "head'' of the camping group was occupation. Chances are four to one that he interviewed for the study of campers (Ap- had previously boated on the Allegheny Res- pendix B). Boaters were contacted as they ervoir. If so, he averaged 2.4 years of boat- returned to launching sites. Interviewers ing on the reservoir, and had spent 11 days briefly explained the purpose of the study boating on the reservoir in the year before and handed the person who was driving a the study. He averaged 8 years of total boat- questionnaire to be returned by mail (Ap- ing experience. Most typically he used a 16- pendix C). For non-power boats, the appar- foot boat powered by a 26- to 80-horsepower ent "head" of the group was the respondent. motor. His average investment in boating Interviews were allocated to recreation equipment was $2,500. He traveled an aver- sites in approximate proportion to their use age distance of 78 miles in less than 2 hours on the sampling day. A total of 157 campers to reach the reservoir. Chances are about and 281 boaters responded. Only two camp- even that he was also a camper. If so, he ers refused to participate in the study. An stayed an average of 4 nights. If he did not 89-percent response was obtained from boat- camp, he stayed on the water for an average ers after one follow-up mailing of the ques- of 5 hours. His group averaged 3.5 people, tionnaire. and chances were about even that it included children. In addition to pleasure boating, his most typical water activity was waterskiing, STUDY RESULTS followed by fishing and swimming. Respondent Profiles User Attitudes A brief discussion of the characteristics of What kinds of management problems do respondents will provide some background users perceive and which do they think are for the attitudes and opinions discussed most important? How do users feel about later. More details are given in Appendix A. current management ? What are their opin- It should be recognized that the two groups ions about management alternatives? surveyed were not mutually exclusive-that Most campers did not feel that facilities is, many campers boated and many boaters were overused. But they did see uncontrolled camped. camping-camping in areas other than desig- The average camper respondent was 42 nated campgrounds-as a problem. Camp- years old and had a high school education. ers criticzed current management for not His $11,000 median annual family income ex- having better facilities, more specialized ceeded the current national median by $500. services, better information services, and site Chances are even that he had camped on the registration procedures. The majority of Allegheny before the study. He had an aver- campers supported limiting the number of age of 6 years total camping experience. His campers, opposed higher fees, felt camping average investment in camping equipment- should be allowed only in designated areas, typically a tent or tent trailer---was $1,400. and favored regular law enforcement with He traveled an average distance of 160 miles appropriate punishment for violators. in 3 hours to reach the reservoir and stayed Most boaters did not view the reservoir for 5 nights.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake of Betrayal 12 19 16.Indd
    Lake of Betrayal VIEWER DISCUSSION GUIDE Top: Producer/Director Paul Lamont and Researcher Caleb Abrams at the former community of Coldspring, Pennsylvania. The Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir in Pennsylvania. Completed in 1965, the dam was Photo by Scott Sackett originally proposed to help mitigate flooding 200 miles down river. Photo by Caleb Abrams Above: Lake of Betrayal Film Crew (Caleb Abrams, Paul Lamont, Stephen McCarthy, John V. Davis). Photo by Scott Sackett Program Synopsis Lake of Betrayal explores the history of Kinzua Dam development and building on the Allegheny River in Pennsylvania and its impact on the Seneca Indian “You grew up feeling that the Nation. Completed in 1965 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the dam was river is power, it has purpose. originally proposed to help mitigate flooding in Pittsburgh—200 miles down That’s the connection of the river. However, the 27-mile reservoir that formed behind the dam inundated Allegheny River; that river has vast tracts of the Seneca Indians’ ancestral lands, forcing their removal in breach of the United States’ oldest treaty, the Treaty of Canandaigua (1794). life.” Lake of Betrayal examines the Seneca Nation’s fight to protect its sovereignty - Dennis J. Bowen, Sr., against the U.S. government’s Indian termination policy and overwhelming Seneca Nation, Bear Clan political and economic forces driving the post-WWII economic boom. The building of the dam also displaced residents in four towns and villages located in Pennsylvania and New York states, a backdrop that is not readily or widely known. While the greatest concentration was the Seneca people working to protect their land and rights, there were larger public and private interests pushing and pulling to revitalize a growing nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Bay Willow Bay These Conservation Areas, Located Within
    Sugar Bay Willow Bay These Conservation Areas, located within the Allegheny Reservoir, support several nesting pairs of osprey (Pandion haliaetus), a state threatened species. The Allegheny Reservoir, also known as Kinzua Lake, is a 12,000-acre impoundment that spans the border between Pennsylvania and New York. In Pennsylvania, the reservoir is completely surrounded by the Allegheny National Forest; and in New York State by Allegany State Park and the Allegany Indian Reservation of the Seneca Nation. The landscape surrounding the reservoir is entirely forested. The osprey is a Neotropical migrant bird species with a range that is widespread and increasing. Its main breeding range extends from northern Canada south to the Great Lakes states and along Atlantic and Gulf Coasts to Florida. More scattered populations breed along inland rivers and lakes. The species is considered imperiled within the state, although its population may be increasing due in part to active management by the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Habitat requirements for osprey vary between sites, but must include an adequate supply of accessible live fish within commuting distance of nest (10–20 km); shallow waters (0.5–2 meters deep) which generally provide the most accessible fish; and open nest sites free from predators (Poole et al. 2002). Reservoirs that provide ample expanses of shallow, clear water have ideal conditions for hunting. Like other fish-eating birds, osprey generally defend only nest sites, not feeding territories. Threats and Stresses Any factor that would decrease water quality of the lake would impact the nesting ospreys. Non- point source pollution from agricultural development upslope from the lake and timber harvesting within forested areas along the lake are the greatest threats to water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny National Forest
    Allegheny National Forest United States Department of Record of Decision Agriculture Forest Service For Final Environmental Impact Statement Allegheny and the National Forest March 2007 Land and Resource Management Plan This document is available in large print. Contact the Allegheny National Forest Supervisor’s Office 1-814-723-5150 TTY 1-814-726-2710 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Allegheny River Islands, R Hokans, photographer Record of Decision For Final Environmental Impact Statement and the Land and Resource Management Plan Allegheny National Forest March 2007 Elk, Forest, McKean, and Warren Counties, Pennsylvania Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Randy Moore, Regional Forester Eastern Region Office USDA Forest Service 626 East Wisconsin avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 414-297-3765
    [Show full text]
  • Kinzua Dam: a Study in the Congressional Disruption
    KINZUA DAM: A STUDY IN THE CONGRESSIONAL DISRUPTION, RELOCATION-RESETTLEMENT, AND REHABILITATION OF THE SENECA NATION OF INDIANS APPROVED: Major Professor 1 / ^C Minor Professor fr^ctor of Department of Dean of the Graduate School KINZUA DAM: A STUDY IN THE CONGRESSIONAL DISRUPTION, RELOCATION-RESETTLEMENT, AND REHABILITATION OF THE SENECA NATION OF INDIANS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Robert Verelst Denton, Texas •January, 1969 PREFACE The study of a current topic presents problems which usually do not confront researchers in earlier periodss such as the accessibility to records and a general unwillingness of participants to respond directly and impartially to questions on controversial subjects. For this study the author was indeed fortunate in persuading many persons involved in the events discussed to speak freely and openly. The history of the rehabilitation of the Seneca Nation of Indians is the story of vested interests. An accurate conclusion of a contro- versial subject such as portrayed in this study becomes increasingly difficult when one confronts so many sides to a single event. Regardless » of conclusions, the professed reason for action by all groups seeking to dominate the affair seemed to have been fair treatment of the Seneca Indians. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vi Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . 1 II. LIEU LANDS 9 III. RECREATION 14 IV. SPECIAL DAMAGES 26 V. RELOCATION AND RESETTLEMENT 54 VI. CONCLUSIONS ........ ....... 64 BIBLIOGRAPHY 74 LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. The Seneca Nation Educational Trust Fund, 1964-1983 ...
    [Show full text]
  • Charted Lakes List
    LAKE LIST United States and Canada Bull Shoals, Marion (AR), HD Powell, Coconino (AZ), HD Gull, Mono Baxter (AR), Taney (MO), Garfield (UT), Kane (UT), San H. V. Eastman, Madera Ozark (MO) Juan (UT) Harry L. Englebright, Yuba, Chanute, Sharp Saguaro, Maricopa HD Nevada Chicot, Chicot HD Soldier Annex, Coconino Havasu, Mohave (AZ), La Paz HD UNITED STATES Coronado, Saline St. Clair, Pinal (AZ), San Bernardino (CA) Cortez, Garland Sunrise, Apache Hell Hole Reservoir, Placer Cox Creek, Grant Theodore Roosevelt, Gila HD Henshaw, San Diego HD ALABAMA Crown, Izard Topock Marsh, Mohave Hensley, Madera Dardanelle, Pope HD Upper Mary, Coconino Huntington, Fresno De Gray, Clark HD Icehouse Reservior, El Dorado Bankhead, Tuscaloosa HD Indian Creek Reservoir, Barbour County, Barbour De Queen, Sevier CALIFORNIA Alpine Big Creek, Mobile HD DeSoto, Garland Diamond, Izard Indian Valley Reservoir, Lake Catoma, Cullman Isabella, Kern HD Cedar Creek, Franklin Erling, Lafayette Almaden Reservoir, Santa Jackson Meadows Reservoir, Clay County, Clay Fayetteville, Washington Clara Sierra, Nevada Demopolis, Marengo HD Gillham, Howard Almanor, Plumas HD Jenkinson, El Dorado Gantt, Covington HD Greers Ferry, Cleburne HD Amador, Amador HD Greeson, Pike HD Jennings, San Diego Guntersville, Marshall HD Antelope, Plumas Hamilton, Garland HD Kaweah, Tulare HD H. Neely Henry, Calhoun, St. HD Arrowhead, Crow Wing HD Lake of the Pines, Nevada Clair, Etowah Hinkle, Scott Barrett, San Diego Lewiston, Trinity Holt Reservoir, Tuscaloosa HD Maumelle, Pulaski HD Bear Reservoir,
    [Show full text]
  • June 13, 2019 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District 2200 WILLIAM S
    June 13, 2019 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District 2200 WILLIAM S. MOORHEAD FEDERAL BUILDING 1000 LIBERTY AVENUE PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-4186 Via Email: [email protected] RE: Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir Master Plan Revision To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of the ADK (Adirondack Mountain Club), thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Master Plan Revision for the Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir. We respectfully request that you consider the following concerns and comments outlined below. ADK (Adirondack Mountain Club) ADK is the only nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting and advocating for New York State’s wild lands and waters while also teaching people how to enjoy natural places responsibly. Since 1922, the organization has offered people opportunities to stay and play in as well as protect, discover, and explore the outdoors. Today, ADK has 30,000 members in 27 chapters statewide and is served by a professional, year-round staff. The organization is recognized as a vital voice in the commitment to environmental stewardship and ethical outdoor recreation in New York State. ADK members hike, camp, snowshoe, cross-country ski, paddle, and cycle the lands and waters of the Adirondack Park and other public lands and waters, including the Allegheny State Park, Allegheny National Forest, and Allegheny Reservoir. Our members are also monitors and maintainers of trails and recreation infrastructure as well as watchdogs of public lands and watersheds to monitor for invasive species or irresponsible and destructive motorized trespass. Many of our members regularly use New York’s largest state park, Allegany State Park (ASP), managed by New York’s Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP).
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover 4 X 10
    ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST REGION KINZUA SKY WALK “One of the Top 10 Most Scenic Skywalks in the World” Nearby but a GUIDE world away Allegheny National Forest Kinzua Sky Walk All Within a Day’s Drive Buffalo, NY: 65 miles. Cleveland, OH: Front Cover 161 miles. Erie, PA: 4 x 10 71 miles. Pittsburgh, PA: 126 miles. Washington, D.C.: 300 miles. Toronto, Canada: 124 miles. Largest City: Bradford is 5 minutes from PA/NY state line. OUTDOOR RESOURCES Allegheny National Forest Ranger Station 29 Forest Service Drive, Bradford, PA 16701 Bradford: 814-362-4613 Marienville: 814-927-5700 Warren: 814-728-6100 fs.usda.gov/allegheny • email: [email protected] State Parks and Forests Fishing/Boating 1-888-PA-Parks 877-707-4085 Forests: 717-783-7941 fishandboat.com dcnr.state.pa.us dcnr.state.pa.us email: [email protected] email: [email protected] PA Game Commission U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 570-398-4744 Kinzua Dam: 814-726-0661 HOW TO GET HERE – FLY OR DRIVE Driving offers the scenery of Route 6, the Kinzua Byway, and the Longhouse National Scenic Byway. Daily Flights Pittsburgh and Washington Dulles Bradford Regional Airport, Lewis Run, PA Southern Airways Express iflysouthern.com Ace Rent A Car acerentacar.com Zook Motors Rental Vehicles zookmotors.net/Rental-Vehicles VisitANF.com VisitANF.com 1.800.473.9370 Info: 800-473-9370 or VisitANF.com McKean County Airport University of Pittsburgh at Bradford Ellicottville Allegheny National Forest Holiday Valley Resort Visitors Bureau Welcome Center ATV Trails ANF Visitors Bureau Welcome Center 80 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Cattaraugus County Land Use Plan 2000
    CATTARAUGUS COUNTY LAND USE PLAN YEAR 2000 CATTARAUGUS COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Cattaraugus County Planning Board 303 Court Street Little Valley, New York The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Federal Grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development under the Comprehensive Planning Assistance Pro- gram authorized by Section 701 of the Federal Housing Act of 1954, as amended. This report was prepared under the Compre- hensive Planning Assistance Program for the New York State Department of State. It is financed in part by the State of New York. EHDLlOGRAPHIC uATA I•. I{q.O({ N",. 3. Rccipicnt's Acc<:ssiun· N.,. SHEET ~ CCPB-LUII [ 4. 1 ili<: .•nJ ~ubti[lc ~.Repon U"tc upifaTe--a- June, 1977 Dee.1982 Cattaraugus County Land Use Plan 6. 7. Auchot(s) 8. Pcrforming OrganizatIon P.cpt. No. Michael J. Kayes 9. Pedorltling Organization t-.:>me and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit ~o. Cattaraugus County Planning Board 11. Contract/Grant No. ~- 303 Court Street Little Valley, New York 14755 CPA-NY-02-00-ll0l ._------- 12. SponSOf ing Or £"niz'nion Name and Addre ss 13. Type of Report &. Pe"..xJ Cove/cd U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Final 451 7th Street S.W. 14- -- Washington, D.C. 20410 15...supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with New York State Department of State 16. Abstracts This report sum..rnarizes the land use in Cattaraugus County from the standpoint of growth considerations which include land use, tran Po:r;tation,utility services, physical limitations, economy and popu1 atlon.
    [Show full text]
  • By Frank G. Lesure1, Wallace De Witt, Jr.1, and Robert A. Welsh, Jr.2
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1510-C PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE CORNPLANTER ROADLESS AREA, WARREN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA By Frank G. Lesure1, Wallace de Witt, Jr.1, and Robert A. Welsh, Jr.2 Studies Related to Wilderness Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3,1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Cornplanter Roadless Area, Allegheny National Forest, Warren County, Pa. The area was classified as a further planning area (09031) during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) by theU.S. Forest Service, January 1979. SUMMARY The Cornplanter Roadless Area of about 3,000 acres (1,220 ha) in the Allegheny National Forest, Warren County, Pa., contains flat-lying sedimentary rocks of Paleozoic age that have a high potential for gas and a moderate potential for oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca Nation Identifies Major Shortcomings Of
    March 7, 2013 Seneca Nation Identifies Major Shortcomings of Competition in Fight for Federal Hydro License Posted in: News Tribal Lands currently used for Seneca Pumped Storage Project CATTARAUGUS/ALLEGANY TERRITORIES - FirstEnergy, the operator of the Seneca Pumped Storage Project near the Kinzua Dam in northwestern Pennsylvania, lacks the necessary property rights to successfully operate the Project, the Seneca Nation of Indians asserted in an official submission filed on Monday with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The Seneca Nation made this submission in connection with the relicensing proceedings before the federal agency for the hydropower generation project. The Seneca Nation and FirstEnergy are both competing for the federal license to run the facility. "FirstEnergy does not have and has never had the Seneca Nation's consent to use our sovereign tribal lands for power generation, " said Seneca Nation President Barry E. Snyder, Sr. "It's just another example of outsiders taking Indian property rights and using them for personal gain without properly compensating the Indians," said Snyder. The Seneca Pumped Storage Project is located along the Allegheny River and Reservoir in the Seneca's Allegany Territory, southern New York, and northern Pennsylvania. The Project pumps water from the Allegheny Reservoir to an upper reservoir and releases the water from the upper reservoir back into the Allegheny River and Reservoir, generating hydropower in the process. The license of the current operator, FirstEnergy, will expire in 2015. In connection with its efforts to regain the federal license, FirstEnergy is seeking to condemn the Nation's sovereign land rights as part of the regulatory process.
    [Show full text]
  • Boat Launches, Marinas, Beaches
    visitANF.com WATER AdvENTuREs McKean County Waterways 18. Allegheny Reservoir Kinzua Wolf run Marina species: W* Acreage: 12,000 Motors: unlimited Boat Access: surfaced ramp 19. Hamlin Lake species: t* Acreage: 17 Motors: no Motors Boat Access: cartop Access 20. Marilla Reservoir species: t&W* Acreage: 25 Motors: electric Boat Access: cartop Access *Species Key: “W” stands for variety of “Water species” such as bass, muskie, walleye, crappie, catfish and panfish. “t” indicates “stocked trout” FIsHING LICENsEs • Tourist license - 1, 3 or 7 Day • Resident & senior resident • Licenses are available at more than 1,300 licensing agents or online at: www.fish.state.pa.us Red Lines Indicate stocked Trout Waters • Info: 717-705-7930 Beaches Where’s The Water? Allegheny Reservoir Beaches – Kinzua Beach – Kiasutha Beach Boating, Swimming, Fishing and More! Non-Reservoir Beaches – loleta, twin lakes Boat Launches Fishing Allegheny Reservoir - Daily Fee the Allegheny national Forest Willow Bay Recreation Area – (N 41-59-49 W 78-56-14) located on offers the angler a variety of fishing the south shore of Willow Bay. camping, cabins, restrooms and courtesy opportunities from small native brook dock available. trout to trophy fishing for muskie, Elijah Run – (N 41-49-11 W 78-56-82) located on the west bank of pike and walleye in the Allegheny red Bridge arm. Fishing pier, courtesy dock, restrooms and shoreline trail. reservoir. the Allegheny reservoir, limited winter access. a 12,000-acre impoundment on Webbs Ferry – (N 41-59-77 W 78-57-80) courtesy dock, fishing pier, the Allegheny river, is the largest shoreline trail and restrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Find Yourself in the Allegheny National Forest
    visitANF.com Find yourself in the Allegheny National Forest Like winding roads and scenic byways? Seeking an area where one car in front of you at a stop sign is considered “heavy” traffic? The seven driving trails in this brochure take you through the Pennsylvania Wilds, the forestlands of the Allegheny National Forest, the ridges of the Allegheny Mountains and the farmlands along scenic Route 6. In the Allegheny National Forest region, everything is bigger. The sky is more vast, the mountains higher, the trees a bit taller. Travel into this area provides an opportunity to relax, slow down and unwind. You will discover “Authentic America” Kinzua Bridge Scenic Byway, State Route 3011, Pennsylvania’s FIRST Scenic Byway along the two-lane meandering roadway of Route 6, named by National Geographic Traveler as “One of America’s Most Scenic Drives.” The fall foliage peeks early in the upper elevations of the Alleghenies; prime “leaf peeping” is late September and the first two weeks in October. Travel Savvy Magazine named the Longhouse National Scenic Drive in the Allegheny National Forest as one of the top six fall foliage drives in the United States. Fall really is bigger here! McKean County, a central location for exploring the region, is conveniently accessed from points north from Canada via New York’s Interstate 86 and Pennsylvania’s Route 219. Traveling from the south? Travel Interstate 80 to Route 66 or Route 153 and head north! Plan your visit during one of our 18 annual fairs and festivals. Play in the outdoors on more than 600 miles of trails or enjoy boating and fishing on the Allegheny Reservoir.
    [Show full text]