DOCSLIB.ORG

February 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
February 2009 THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER No. 378 February 2009 Society NEW YEAR BALLOTING FOR Meetings HONOURS LIST A NEW UNIFIED and Events We extend congratulations to MATHEMATICAL Martin Taylor, FRS, Professor 2009 of Pure Mathematics at the SOCIETY Friday 27 February University of Manchester, on The time is at hand. As the old Mary Cartwright the award of a knighthood for television presenter used to say, Lecture, London services to Science. Professor it is ‘make your mind up time’! [page 7] Taylor served as LMS President The Councils of the LMS and of 1998–2000, and is currently the IMA have commended the 31 March – 4 April Physical Secretary and Vice- proposal for a new mathematics LMS Invited Lectures President of the Royal Soci- society to their members and Edinburgh [page 6] ety. He was awarded the LMS now it is for those members Friday 3 July Whitehead prize in 1982 and to vote on the proposal. If you London was the first Fröhlich Lecturer didn’t get a chance to attend in 2003. He proved the Fröhlich one of the meetings that the two Wednesday 15 July Conjecture relating the sym- Presidents held at various venues SW & South Wales metries of algebraic integers around the country, you can still Regional Meeting to the behaviour of certain get involved by using the NUMS Southampton analytic functions called Artin website www.newmathsoc.org.uk. Wednesday L-functions. There you will find views in fa- 16 September vour and against the proposal Midlands Regional and also have an opportunity to Meeting, Leicester hear what the Presidents had to Friday 20 November say. You can even still contribute AGM, London to the debate yourself. The worst possible result for 4–6 December © The Royal Society the two societies would not Joint Meeting with the be an overwhelming rejection Belgian Mathematical or acceptance but a poor turn- Society out. A low vote in either soci- ety would make difficulties for that Council. Please, therefore, if you do nothing else – vote. We need a decisive result. Charles Evans, Honorary Secretary IMA Charles Goldie, Sir Martin Taylor, FRS General Secretary LMS February09-NL.indd 1 29/01/2009 14:03:15 THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER SAVE THE LMS mathematicians all over the world. In our also rather exasperating, because clearly view, most of this will be lost if we ‘merge’ some people do want the ‘merger’. It should LMS members may think the merger is with the IMA. be noted, however, that those in favour of already decided, and that there is nothing It is clear in the proposal for the new soci- it did not form an overwhelming majority they can do, but that is not the case. Nor ety that it would have a significantly greater on the LMS Council: a couple more absten- should they feel that they ought to defer bureaucratic structure. This is pretty much tions or votes against would have stopped to the decision of the Council: the LMS inevitable, given the very wide range of in- the whole process. Council had no more information to go terests it would have to serve. Do we really It is very important to vote against this on than the members have and, moreover, need even more bureaucracy in our lives? proposal. It has been presented as inevita- could depend on the later membership The new society would have an explicit ble, but it is not, and LMS members can stop vote as a safety net. The LMS members hierarchy, with its Fellowship grade, com- it. We only have one chance, though. face the real choice whether they want pletely against the tradition of the LMS. Alexandre Borovik, Stephen Huggett to merge with the IMA or not. We think The reserved fund, as described in the and Burt Totaro the merger would be a terrible mistake, proposal, would not be big enough, so http://savelms.wordpress.com/ and we have set up a web page at there will be a reduction in the level of http://savelms.wordpress.com/ to encour- grant support. Nor is the fund’s purpose age a discussion. Here are the points we sharply enough defined, and so what sup- SAVE UK MATHEMATICS think most important. port there is will be spread over a wider 2 What we value most about the LMS is range of activities. I welcome the article by my Council col- that it provides what mathematicians Former LMS members would not be able leagues Sasha (Alexandre), Stephen and most need: excellent journals and access to do anything about this, being outvoted Burt, as it allows me the opportunity to to small but useful grants, with almost by 2 to 1. This outvoting would happen correct various misunderstandings. I take no bureaucracy or hierarchy. It has been first in the choice of a name for the new their points roughly in order. working this way for a long time, and society. Discussion sites. Why have they set up over the years has won a very high reputa- Many people have said “nobody I know is their own site, when the joint consulta- tion and the loyalty of a large number of in favour of this”, which is heartening but tion site www.newmathsoc.org.uk/ has a discussion group at http://groups.google. co.uk/group/newmathsoc which they and LMS Newsletter everyone else have been free to post to? General Editor: Dr D.R.J. Chillingworth ([email protected]) Having two sites hinders communication rather than helping it. Reports Editor: Dr S.A. Huggett ([email protected]) What the LMS provides. When Stephen Reviews Editor: Mr A.J.S. Mann ([email protected]) joined in 976 the LMS was concerned al- Administrative Editor: Miss S.M. Oakes ([email protected]) most entirely with publications and meet- Editorial office address: London Mathematical Society, De Morgan House, 57–58 Russell Square, ings. By the time Sasha joined in 1992 grants London WC1B 4HS (t: 020 7637 3686; f: 020 7323 3655; e: [email protected], w: www.lms.ac.uk) had become salient, though at nothing like Typeset by the London Mathematical Society at De Morgan House; printed by Holbrooks Printers Ltd. today’s level, but when Burt joined in 2001 the Society had acquired De Morgan House Publication dates and deadlines: published monthly, except August. Items and advertisements by the first day of the month prior to publication, or the closest preceding working day. and significantly expanded its activities, to include, among other things, engagement News items and notices in the Newsletter are free to be used elsewhere unless otherwise stated, with research councils, with Government, although attribution is requested when reproducing whole articles. Contributions to the Newsletter are made under a non-exclusive licence; please contact the author for the rights to reproduce. The with education bodies and much else. Such LMS cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of information in the Newsletter. Views expressed engagement is hardly an option in today’s do not necessarily represent the views or policy of the London Mathematical Society. world where science is not a ‘given’, nor Charity registration number: 252660. even mathematics within science; all has to be fought for. Involvement with policy February09-NL.indd 2 29/01/2009 14:03:16 No. 378 February 2009 mathematicians all over the world. In our also rather exasperating, because clearly at national level must continue, and the view, most of this will be lost if we ‘merge’ some people do want the ‘merger’. It should expectation is that with a single unified with the IMA. be noted, however, that those in favour of voice, a national rather than a local title, It is clear in the proposal for the new soci- it did not form an overwhelming majority and no duplication of effort, the new soci- ety that it would have a significantly greater on the LMS Council: a couple more absten- ety will be able to do so more effectively. bureaucratic structure. This is pretty much tions or votes against would have stopped Bureaucracy. It is good that the three au- inevitable, given the very wide range of in- the whole process. thors recognise that the LMS has “almost terests it would have to serve. Do we really It is very important to vote against this no bureaucracy”. Given that the new so- need even more bureaucracy in our lives? proposal. It has been presented as inevita- ciety will be doing the same things as the The new society would have an explicit ble, but it is not, and LMS members can stop current ones, with the same staff and with hierarchy, with its Fellowship grade, com- it. We only have one chance, though. officers and Council drawn from the same pletely against the tradition of the LMS. Alexandre Borovik, Stephen Huggett pool, there is no likelihood of any increase The reserved fund, as described in the and Burt Totaro in bureaucracy; indeed the removal of du- proposal, would not be big enough, so http://savelms.wordpress.com/ plication and the sharing of compliance there will be a reduction in the level of duties that are exceptionally burdensome grant support. Nor is the fund’s purpose on small organisations (charity law, health sharply enough defined, and so what sup- SAVE UK MATHEMATICS & safety, employment law, etc., etc.) will al- port there is will be spread over a wider low more effort to be devoted to what the range of activities. I welcome the article by my Council col- society is for, rather than to its ‘housekeep- 3 Former LMS members would not be able leagues Sasha (Alexandre), Stephen and ing’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FIELDS MEDAL for Mathematical Efforts R
    Recognizing the Real and the Potential: FIELDS MEDAL for Mathematical Efforts R Fields Medal recipients since inception Year Winners 1936 Lars Valerian Ahlfors (Harvard University) (April 18, 1907 – October 11, 1996) Jesse Douglas (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (July 3, 1897 – September 7, 1965) 1950 Atle Selberg (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton) (June 14, 1917 – August 6, 2007) 1954 Kunihiko Kodaira (Princeton University) (March 16, 1915 – July 26, 1997) 1962 John Willard Milnor (Princeton University) (born February 20, 1931) The Fields Medal 1966 Paul Joseph Cohen (Stanford University) (April 2, 1934 – March 23, 2007) Stephen Smale (University of California, Berkeley) (born July 15, 1930) is awarded 1970 Heisuke Hironaka (Harvard University) (born April 9, 1931) every four years 1974 David Bryant Mumford (Harvard University) (born June 11, 1937) 1978 Charles Louis Fefferman (Princeton University) (born April 18, 1949) on the occasion of the Daniel G. Quillen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (June 22, 1940 – April 30, 2011) International Congress 1982 William P. Thurston (Princeton University) (October 30, 1946 – August 21, 2012) Shing-Tung Yau (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton) (born April 4, 1949) of Mathematicians 1986 Gerd Faltings (Princeton University) (born July 28, 1954) to recognize Michael Freedman (University of California, San Diego) (born April 21, 1951) 1990 Vaughan Jones (University of California, Berkeley) (born December 31, 1952) outstanding Edward Witten (Institute for Advanced Study,
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams
    Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Alba Carballo González for support and encouragement. 1 Table of Contents Sofia Kovalevskaya ................................................................................................................................. 4 Emmy Noether ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Mary Cartwright ................................................................................................................................... 26 Julia Robinson ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Olga Ladyzhenskaya ............................................................................................................................. 46 Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat ....................................................................................................................... 56 Olga Oleinik .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Charlotte Fischer .................................................................................................................................. 77 Karen Uhlenbeck .................................................................................................................................. 87 Krystyna Kuperberg .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the History of Dynamical Systems and Chaos
    Historia Mathematica 29 (2002), 273–339 doi:10.1006/hmat.2002.2351 Writing the History of Dynamical Systems and Chaos: View metadata, citation and similar papersLongue at core.ac.uk Dur´ee and Revolution, Disciplines and Cultures1 brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector David Aubin Max-Planck Institut fur¨ Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin, Germany E-mail: [email protected] and Amy Dahan Dalmedico Centre national de la recherche scientifique and Centre Alexandre-Koyre,´ Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] Between the late 1960s and the beginning of the 1980s, the wide recognition that simple dynamical laws could give rise to complex behaviors was sometimes hailed as a true scientific revolution impacting several disciplines, for which a striking label was coined—“chaos.” Mathematicians quickly pointed out that the purported revolution was relying on the abstract theory of dynamical systems founded in the late 19th century by Henri Poincar´e who had already reached a similar conclusion. In this paper, we flesh out the historiographical tensions arising from these confrontations: longue-duree´ history and revolution; abstract mathematics and the use of mathematical techniques in various other domains. After reviewing the historiography of dynamical systems theory from Poincar´e to the 1960s, we highlight the pioneering work of a few individuals (Steve Smale, Edward Lorenz, David Ruelle). We then go on to discuss the nature of the chaos phenomenon, which, we argue, was a conceptual reconfiguration as
    [Show full text]
  • Alwyn C. Scott
    the frontiers collection the frontiers collection Series Editors: A.C. Elitzur M.P. Silverman J. Tuszynski R. Vaas H.D. Zeh The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active scientists in all areas to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, consciousness and complex systems – the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. Other Recent Titles The Thermodynamic Machinery of Life By M. Kurzynski The Emerging Physics of Consciousness Edited by J. A. Tuszynski Weak Links Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks By P. Csermely Quantum Mechanics at the Crossroads New Perspectives from History, Philosophy and Physics Edited by J. Evans, A.S. Thorndike Particle Metaphysics A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality By B. Falkenburg The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time By H.D. Zeh Asymmetry: The Foundation of Information By S.J. Muller Mindful Universe Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer By H. Stapp Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition By M. Schlosshauer For a complete list of titles in The Frontiers Collection, see back of book Alwyn C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fairly Complete History and Tour of Aynho Village – Updated January 2017 Aynho Is a Two-Part Name
    A Fairly Complete History and Tour of Aynho Village – updated January 2017 Aynho is a two-part name - ‘Ayn’ is either a corruption of a Saxon personal name, or more likely the Saxon word for a spring or stream. The ‘Hoh’ is a Saxon word for a promontory/projecting ridge of land standing on a plain as Aynho does. The earliest mention (in the Domesday Book) of an owner of the manor of Aynho is Asgar - a Danish thane (knight). He was standard bearer for Edward the Confessor who reigned from 1042 to 1066. (Edward was born at Islip about fifteen miles south east of Aynho, so he probably knew Asgar). The entry showed 3¼ hides (about 400 acres altogether), land for 8 ploughs, a mill and 20 acres of meadow. Why was Aynho so relatively important in the mid-ten hundreds? Probably because of its location high up overlooking the whole Cherwell valley. There were very few significant houses in existence within a radius of twenty miles at that time, and it is believed that Aynho had a substantial wooden Saxon manor house then. For example Oxford Castle was not built until 1073, Banbury Castle 1135, Broughton Castle 1300, Rousham House 1635 and Upton House 1695. The first proper Oxford College, University College, wasn’t founded until1249. Apart from Aynho north of Oxford only Sulgrave Manor is recorded as having an Anglo-Saxon Manor House around the late 9th century. William the Conqueror gave the village to one of his barons, Geoffrey de Mandeville, for helping him win the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Numbers and Colors
    Complex Numbers and Colors For the sixth year, “Complex Beauties” provides you with a look into the wonderful world of complex functions and the life and work of mathematicians who contributed to our understanding of this field. As always, we intend to reach a diverse audience: While most explanations require some mathemati- cal background on the part of the reader, we hope non-mathematicians will find our “phase portraits” exciting and will catch a glimpse of the richness and beauty of complex functions. We would particularly like to thank our guest authors: Jonathan Borwein and Armin Straub wrote on random walks and corresponding moment functions and Jorn¨ Steuding contributed two articles, one on polygamma functions and the second on almost periodic functions. The suggestion to present a Belyi function and the possibility for the numerical calculations came from Donald Marshall; the November title page would not have been possible without Hrothgar’s numerical solution of the Bla- sius equation. The construction of the phase portraits is based on the interpretation of complex numbers z as points in the Gaussian plane. The horizontal coordinate x of the point representing z is called the real part of z (Re z) and the vertical coordinate y of the point representing z is called the imaginary part of z (Im z); we write z = x + iy. Alternatively, the point representing z can also be given by its distance from the origin (jzj, the modulus of z) and an angle (arg z, the argument of z). The phase portrait of a complex function f (appearing in the picture on the left) arises when all points z of the domain of f are colored according to the argument (or “phase”) of the value w = f (z).
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Mathematics 224
    CONTEMPORARY MATHEMATICS 224 Recent Progress in Algebra An International Conference on Recent Progress in Algebra August 11-15, 1997 KAIST, Taejon, South Korea Sang Geun Hahn Hyo Chul Myung Efim Zelmanov Editors http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/conm/224 Selected Titles in This Series 224 Sang Geun Hahn, Hyo Chul Myung, and Efim Zelmanov, Editors, Recent progress in algebra, 1999 223 Bernard Chazelle, Jacob E. Goodman, and Richard Pollack, Editors, Advances in discrete and computational geometry, 1999 222 Kang-Tae Kim and Steven G. Krantz, Editors, Complex geometric analysis in Pohang, 1999 221 J. Robert Dorroh, Gisela Ruiz Goldstein, Jerome A. Goldstein, and Michael Mudi Tom, Editors, Applied analysis, 1999 220 Mark Mahowald and Stewart Priddy, Editors, Homotopy theory via algebraic geometry and group representations, 1998 219 Marc Henneaux, Joseph Krasil'shchik, and Alexandre Vinogradov, Editors, Secondary calculus and cohomological physics, 1998 218 Jan Mandel, Charbel Farhat, and Xiao-Chuan Cai, Editors, Domain decomposition methods 10, 1998 217 Eric Carlen, Evans M. Harrell, and Michael Loss, Editors, Advances in differential equations and mathematical physics, 1998 216 Akram Aldroubi and EnBing Lin, Editors, Wavelets, multiwavelets, and their applications, 1998 215 M. G. Nerurkar, D. P. Dokken, and D. B. Ellis, Editors, Topological dynamics and applications, 1998 214 Lewis A. Coburn and Marc A. Rieffel, Editors, Perspectives on quantization, 1998 213 Farhad Jafari, Barbara D. MacCiuer, Carl C. Cowen, and A. Duane Porter, Editors, Studies on composition operators, 1998 212 E. Ramirez de Arellano, N. Salinas, M. V. Shapiro, and N. L. Vasilevski, Editors, Operator theory for complex and hypercomplex analysis, 1998 211 J6zef Dodziuk and Linda Keen, Editors, Lipa's legacy: Proceedings from the Bers Colloquium, 1997 210 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Time for Mathematicians in Heidelberg
    Mathematical Communities Marjorie Senechal, Editor eidelberg, one of Germany’s ancient places of Party Time HHlearning, is making a new bid for fame with the Heidelberg Laureate Forum (HLF). Each year, two hundred young researchers from all over the world—one for Mathematicians hundred mathematicians and one hundred computer scientists—are selected by application to attend the one- week event, which is usually held in September. The young in Heidelberg scientists attend lectures by preeminent scholars, all of whom are laureates of the Abel Prize (awarded by the OSMO PEKONEN Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters), the Fields Medal (awarded by the International Mathematical Union), the Nevanlinna Prize (awarded by the International Math- ematical Union and the University of Helsinki, Finland), or the Computing Prize and the Turing Prize (both awarded This column is a forum for discussion of mathematical by the Association for Computing Machinery). communities throughout the world, and through all In 2018, for instance, the following eminences appeared as lecturers at the sixth HLF, which I attended as a science time. Our definition of ‘‘mathematical community’’ is journalist: Sir Michael Atiyah and Gregory Margulis (both Abel laureates and Fields medalists); the Abel laureate the broadest: ‘‘schools’’ of mathematics, circles of Srinivasa S. R. Varadhan; the Fields medalists Caucher Bir- kar, Gerd Faltings, Alessio Figalli, Shigefumi Mori, Bào correspondence, mathematical societies, student Chaˆu Ngoˆ, Wendelin Werner, and Efim Zelmanov; Robert organizations, extracurricular educational activities Endre Tarjan and Leslie G. Valiant (who are both Nevan- linna and Turing laureates); the Nevanlinna laureate (math camps, math museums, math clubs), and more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top Mathematics Award
    Fields told me and which I later verified in Sweden, namely, that Nobel hated the mathematician Mittag- Leffler and that mathematics would not be one of the do- mains in which the Nobel prizes would The Top Mathematics be available." Award Whatever the reason, Nobel had lit- tle esteem for mathematics. He was Florin Diacuy a practical man who ignored basic re- search. He never understood its impor- tance and long term consequences. But Fields did, and he meant to do his best John Charles Fields to promote it. Fields was born in Hamilton, Ontario in 1863. At the age of 21, he graduated from the University of Toronto Fields Medal with a B.A. in mathematics. Three years later, he fin- ished his Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University and was then There is no Nobel Prize for mathematics. Its top award, appointed professor at Allegheny College in Pennsylvania, the Fields Medal, bears the name of a Canadian. where he taught from 1889 to 1892. But soon his dream In 1896, the Swedish inventor Al- of pursuing research faded away. North America was not fred Nobel died rich and famous. His ready to fund novel ideas in science. Then, an opportunity will provided for the establishment of to leave for Europe arose. a prize fund. Starting in 1901 the For the next 10 years, Fields studied in Paris and Berlin annual interest was awarded yearly with some of the best mathematicians of his time. Af- for the most important contributions ter feeling accomplished, he returned home|his country to physics, chemistry, physiology or needed him.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the European Mathematical Society
    NEWSLETTER OF THE EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY S E European March 2017 M M Mathematical Issue 103 E S Society ISSN 1027-488X Features History Spectral Synthesis for Claude Shannon: His Work Operators and Systems and Its Legacy Diffusion, Optimal Transport Discussion and Ricci Curvature for Metric Mathematics: Art and Science Measure Spaces Bratislava, venue of the EMS Executive Committee Meeting, 17–19 March 2017 New journals published by the Editor-in-Chief: Mark Sapir, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA Editors: Goulnara Arzhantseva (University of Vienna, Austria) Frédéric Chapoton (CNRS and Université de Strasbourg, France) Pavel Etingof (Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA) Harald Andrés Helfgott (Georg-August Universität Göttingen, Germany and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Paris VI/VII), France) Ivan Losev (Northeastern University, Boston, USA) Volodymyr Nekrashevych (Texas A&M University, College Station, USA) Henry K. Schenck (University of Illinois, Urbana, USA) Efim Zelmanov (University of California at San Diego, USA) ISSN print 2415-6302 Aims and Scope ISSN online 2415-6310 The Journal of Combinatorial Algebra is devoted to the publication of research articles of 2017. Vol. 1. 4 issues the highest level. Its domain is the rich and deep area of interplay between combinatorics Approx. 400 pages. 17.0 x 24.0 cm and algebra. Its scope includes combinatorial aspects of group, semigroup and ring theory, Price of subscription: representation theory, commutative algebra, algebraic geometry and dynamical systems. 198¤ online only / 238 ¤ print+online Exceptionally strong research papers from all parts of mathematics related to these fields are also welcome. Editors: Luc Devroye (McGill University, Montreal, Canada) Gabor Lugosi (UPF Barcelona, Spain) Shahar Mendelson (Technion, Haifa, Israel and Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) Elchanan Mossel (MIT, Cambridge, USA) J.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds and Frogs Equation
    Notices of the American Mathematical Society ISSN 0002-9920 ABCD springer.com New and Noteworthy from Springer Quadratic Diophantine Multiscale Principles of Equations Finite Harmonic of the American Mathematical Society T. Andreescu, University of Texas at Element Analysis February 2009 Volume 56, Number 2 Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA; D. Andrica, Methods A. Deitmar, University Cluj-Napoca, Romania Theory and University of This text treats the classical theory of Applications Tübingen, quadratic diophantine equations and Germany; guides readers through the last two Y. Efendiev, Texas S. Echterhoff, decades of computational techniques A & M University, University of and progress in the area. The presenta- College Station, Texas, USA; T. Y. Hou, Münster, Germany California Institute of Technology, tion features two basic methods to This gently-paced book includes a full Pasadena, CA, USA investigate and motivate the study of proof of Pontryagin Duality and the quadratic diophantine equations: the This text on the main concepts and Plancherel Theorem. The authors theories of continued fractions and recent advances in multiscale finite emphasize Banach algebras as the quadratic fields. It also discusses Pell’s element methods is written for a broad cleanest way to get many fundamental Birds and Frogs equation. audience. Each chapter contains a results in harmonic analysis. simple introduction, a description of page 212 2009. Approx. 250 p. 20 illus. (Springer proposed methods, and numerical 2009. Approx. 345 p. (Universitext) Monographs in Mathematics) Softcover examples of those methods. Softcover ISBN 978-0-387-35156-8 ISBN 978-0-387-85468-7 $49.95 approx. $59.95 2009. X, 234 p. (Surveys and Tutorials in The Strong Free Will the Applied Mathematical Sciences) Solving Softcover Theorem Introduction to Siegel the Pell Modular Forms and ISBN: 978-0-387-09495-3 $44.95 Equation page 226 Dirichlet Series Intro- M.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Prof. Carola{Bibiane Schonlieb¨ Address Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (DAMTP) University of Cambridge Wilberforce Road Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK & Jesus College Cambridge CB5 8BL, UK Tel.: business +44/1223/764251 Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/cia/, http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/cbs31/ Personal Details Date of birth: 21th of December, 1979 Place of birth: Vienna, Austria Present Citizenship: Austrian Career 09/2018{ Professor of Applied Mathematics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theo- retical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK. 09/2016{ Alan Turing Institute Fellow, Alan Turing Institute, British Library, London, UK. 03/2016{ Co-Director then Director of the EPSRC Centre for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Multimodal Clinical Imaging, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cam- bridge, UK. 11/2015{ Director of the Cantab Capital Institute for Mathematics of Information, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Cambridge, UK. 10/2015{08/2018 Reader in Applied and Computational Analysis, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK. 10/2011{ Head of Cambridge Image Analysis, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theo- retical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK. 10/2011{ Fellow of Jesus College, Cambridge, UK. 09/2010{09/2015 Lecturer in Applied and Computational Analysis, Department of Applied Mathemat- ics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK. 09/2009{09/2010 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Institute of Numerical and Applied Mathematics, Georg- August Universit¨at G¨ottingen, Germany. 10/2008{09/2009 Research Associate, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK.
    [Show full text]