DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance 94638 Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms Burundi Public Expenditure Review OCTOBER 2014 B Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms OCTOBER 2014 WORLD BANK Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Cover Design and Text Layout:Duina ReyesManaging Bakovic Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms i Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The endorsementboundaries, colors, or acceptance denominations, of such boundaries.and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World BankIf you translation.create a translation The World of thisBank work, shall please not be add liable the for following any content disclaimer or error along in this with translation. the attribution: For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mailCover photo: [email protected]. colline Cover design Aand text layout:meeting in Rutegama Commune, Burundi. Photograph by the World Bank. Republic of Burundi Duina Reyes-Bakovic Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance Public Expenditure Review ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS he Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance report is part of a series T dian Revenue Authority and Mr. Kieran Holmes (former commissaire général, Burundian its effortsof programmatic to promote accelerated policy studies and developed inclusive Revenue Authority). by the World Bank to assist the government in considerable time and information provided by membersThe team ofwould communal also like administrations to acknowledge across the thegrowth, use of improve public resources. access to While basic the services, Government and the country—from administrators to members strengthen transparency and accountability in of Burundi is the primary beneficiary of the of communal staff—who worked side by side analysis, the studies are intended for a wider with the team to produce data for this report. audience, including members of the donor This report would not have been possible community, business leaders, representatives without the generous contributions of the of civil society groups, and other stakeholders Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation engaged in Burundi’s economy. (SDC), and the German Agency for International Cooperation, (GIZ). Finally, the donor working The report has been prepared jointly with the group comprised of SDC, GIZ, the European counterpartsGovernment offor Burundi, this fruitful and collaboration.the World Bank In Union, and the Belgian Technical Cooperation Task Team is most grateful to its government (BTC) provided valuable support and technical inputs during all the stages of the analysis. particular, the team would like to thank His Excellency Mr. Dieudonné Giteruzi (minister The Bank task team was led by Marco Larizza of communal development), His Excellency Mr. (TTL, senior governance and public sector Jean-Claude Ndihokubwayo (former minister specialist) and included Leanne Michelle Bayer of communal development), His Excellency Mr. (co-TTL, senior social development specialist), Edouard Nduwimana (minister of interior), Professor François Vaillancourt (international Honorable Innocent Nkurunziza (senator), as consultant, fiscal decentralization and public well as Honorable Aimé Nkurunziza (deputy at finance), Professor Julien Nimubona (national the national assembly), Mr. Hilaire Ntakuwundi consultant, governance and institutional deve- (permanent secretary, Ministry of Communal lopment), Thea Hilhorst (senior land governance Development), Ms. Immaculée Bigirimana specialist), Sadia Afolabi (consultant), Lydie (permanent secretary, Ministry of Finance and Ahodehou (program assistant) and Pacifique Economic Development Planning), Mr. Jean Ndoricimpa (team assistant). Marie Ntihirageza (director general, Ministry of Communal Development), Mr. Thérence Chapter 2 on fiscal decentralization was Mbonabuca (director general, Ministry of discussed with senior experts of the Interior), Mr. Firmin Sindayihebura (director Decentralization and Subnational Finance of communal finances, Ministry of Interior), Thematic Group, and valuable comments Madame Spes-Caritas Njebarikanuye (director were received from Jonas Frank (senior public general of FONIC), Mr. Nicolas Ndayishimiye sector specialist), Vivek Srivastava (lead (director general of ISTEEBU), Mr. Domitien public sector specialist), Jamie Boex (senior Ndihokubwayo (commissaire general, Burun- fellow, Urban Institute), Serdar Yilmax (senior Republic of Burundi Fiscal Decentralization and Local Governance: Managing Trade-Offs to Promote Sustainable Reforms iii economist), Anne-Lucie Levebfre (senior public Overall technical oversight and guidance was sector specialist), and Balakrishna Menon provided by Albert Zeufack (sector manager), Parameswaran (lead social development Jacques Morisset (lead economist and sector specialist). Chapter 3, on decentralized land leader), and Chiara Bronchi (lead public sector management, was discussed with senior and governance specialist and cluster leader). sector experts, who provided useful insights The team is also grateful to Philippe Dongier and comments to improve the quality of the (country director) and Rachidi Radji (country analysis, including: Andre Teyssier (senior land manager), whose advice and warm support administration specialist), Caroline Plancon were extremely useful in moving the preparation (senior land policy specialist), and Enrique process forward and engaging in effective The task team remains responsible for any Pantoja (senior land administration specialist). dialogue with government authorities. errors or omissions. Credit is also due to a distinguished group of peer reviewers who provided comments on the draft report: Robert Ebel (senior fellow, Urban Institute and Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center), Enrique Pantoja (senior land adminis- tration specialist), and Helene Grandvoinnet Washington, DC (lead social development specialist). October 23, 2014 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ iii Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................... 1 Glossary of Key Terms .................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 4 ................................................................................................................................6 ............................................................................................................................... Key Policy Issues under Investigation Chapter 1. Understanding the Context of Decentralization in Burundi .....................14 Main Messages: Cross-Cutting Issues 11 ........................................................................................ ........................................... Introduction: The Political and Macroeconomic Context ................................................................... 14 1.1 The Decentralization Process since the End ............................................................................................................ of the Conflict: An Overview 17 1.2 The Decision to Decentralize: Understanding Key Incentives 19 1.3 RelationshipsInstitutional Design: ............................................................................................................................... Mapping Key Actors ........................................ 20 1.4 Institutional Design: Promoting Citizens’ Engagement to Strengthen State-Society Incentives ....................................................................................................................... 25 1.5 Obstacles to Moving the Reform ............................................................................................................................... Agenda Forward: Understanding Institutional ... Constraints and Political ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report to the Houses of the Oireachtas on Developments in the European Union
    AN ROINN GNÓTHAÍ EACHTRACHA DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Report to the Houses of the Oireachtas on developments in the European Union 1 July 2020 – 31 December 2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 BREXIT.................................................................................................................................................. 4 Conclusion of EU-UK Negotiations .................................................................................................. 4 Implementation of Withdrawal Agreement and Protocol .............................................................. 5 Readiness for the end of the Transition Period .............................................................................. 5 MULTIANNUAL FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 7 CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF EUROPE ........................................................................................ 9 COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY (CFSP) .......................................................................... 10 COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (CSDP).......................................................................... 10 CYBERSECURITY ................................................................................................................................. 11 HYBRID THREATS AND DISINFORMATION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burundi CERF Narrative Report 2008.Pdf
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE HUMANITARIAN/RESIDENT COORDINATOR ON THE USE OF CERF GRANTS Country Burundi Humanitarian / Resident Youssef Mahmoud Coordinator Reporting Period 1 January – 31 December 2008 I. Executive Summary Two allocations were granted to Burundi in 2008: one from the rapid response window ($1.6 million) and one from the underfunded window ($3.6 million). In both cases and in absence of a Consolidated Humanitarian Appeal for the first time in seven years, CERF funding provided much needed emergency support to tackle both the food crisis and underfunded emergencies in a context of transition and fragile recovery. The initial rapid response allocation came at a critical time for Burundi, one of the countries hardest hit by the soaring food prices with an increase of more than 130 percent between 2007 and 2008. It enabled strengthening the health and nutrition response to needs of 1,100 new severe acute malnourished children and the extension of screening programs for 16,000 children. The purchase of seeds and tools for 40,000 families recently returned from Tanzania prevented a large number of repatriated refugees from falling into the cycle of severe food insecurity. The underfunded grant enabled meeting critical food needs for 15,000 Burundian refugees from 1972 who were repatriated in 2008. This group was initially not included in the planning of UN agencies as their return started when both Burundian and Tanzanian Governments reached an agreement on the naturalization process of those willing to remain in Tanzania. The same grant provided a much needed food return package for Burundians expelled from Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Poor Rural People to Overcome Poverty in Burundi
    ©IFAD Enabling poor rural people to overcome poverty in Burundi Rural poverty in Burundi Located at the heart of the African Great Lakes region, Burundi has weathered nearly two decades of conflict and troubles, which have contributed to widespread poverty. Burundi is ranked 185th out of 187 countries on the 2011 United Nations Development Programme’s human development index, and eight out of ten Burundians live below the poverty line. Per capita gross national income (GNI) in 2010 was US$170, about half its pre-war level some 20 years ago. The country is now rebuilding itself after emerging from recurrent conflict and ethnic and political rivalry. Between 1993 and 2000, an estimated 300,000 civilians were killed and 1.2 million people fled from their homes to live in refugee camps or in exile. During tha t period, life expectancy declined from 51 to 44 years, the poverty rate doubled from 33 to 67 per cent and economic recession pushed the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita down by more than 27 per cent. The long period of fighting was extremely disruptive to agriculture, which is the main source of livelihood for nine out of ten Burundians. The destruction and looting of crops and livestock, as well as general insecurity, has put rural Burundians under serious strains. Burundi was traditionally self-sufficient in food production, but because of conflict and recurrent droughts, the country has had to rely on food imports and international food aid in some regions. The vast majority of Burundi’s poor people are small-scale subsistence farmers trying to recover from the conflict and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized Evaluation
    based decision making decision based - d evaluation for evidence d evaluation Decentralize Decentralized Evaluation Evaluation of the Intervention for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Ngozi, Kirundo, Cankuzo and Rutana 2016–2019 Prepared EvaluationFinal Report, 22 Report May 2020 WFP Burundi Evaluation Manager: Gabrielle Tremblay i | P a g e Prepared by Eric Kouam, Team Leader Aziz Goza, Quantitative Research Expert ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The evaluation team would like to thank Gabrielle Tremblay for facilitating the evaluation process, particularly the inception and data collection mission to Burundi. The team would also like to thank Patricia Papinutti, Michael Ohiarlaithe, Séverine Giroud, Gaston Nkeshimana, Jean Baptiste Niyongabo, Barihuta Leonidas, the entire nutrition team and other departments of the World Food Programme (WFP) country office in Bujumbura and the provinces of Cankuzo, Kirundo, Ngozi, Rutana and Gitega for their precious time, the documents, the data and the information made available to facilitate the development of this report. The evaluation team would also like to thank the government authorities, United Nations (UN) agencies, non-governmental organizations and donors, as well as the health officials and workers, Mentor Mothers, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and parents of children under five who agreed to meet with us. Our gratitude also goes to the evaluation reference group and the evaluation committee for the relevant comments that helped improve the quality of this report, which we hope will be useful in guiding the next planning cycles of the MAM treatment program in Burundi. DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluation team and do not necessarily reflect those of the WFP.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Entrepreneurship: Niger Catalystas
    Report on Entrepreneurship: Niger Catalystas Commissioned by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency RVO Scoping Mission Report on Entrepreneurship: Niger (August 2019 | Amsterdam, the Netherlands) The following report was prepared by Catalystas Consulting, an intersectional feminist international development consulting firm. The report aims to provide a snapshot and an overview of the programs, stakeholders, and opportunities related to youth entrepreneurship (18-35 years old) in Niger. This report is based on a two-week field mission undertaken by Catalystas in June 2019 as part of a broader mission to provide insight into the needs and opportunities of youth employment and entrepreneurship in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. The purpose of this mission and this report is to help the Dutch government to support existing structures and/or develop initiatives to be put in place by other local or international actors. Special attention was paid to young women in the areas of productivity and agricultural value chains. The main objective in undertaking this country-by-country entrepreneurial evaluation and in writing this report is to highlight the programs and initiatives which could be extended in the secondary cities of Maradi and Tahoua, two of the target cities in Niger for Dutch policy. The following report consists of a narrative of approximately 25 pages and five appendices that will provide readers with sufficient insight into the various challenges and opportunities of the target areas and the country. The report is also a first step in informing policymakers and embassy staff of the many opportunities and challenges that need to be considered for effective intervention in the Nigerien entrepreneurial context.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP OF BURUNDI I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 II THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGROUPMENT CAMPS ...................................... 2 III OTHER CAMPS FOR DISPLACED POPULATIONS ........................................ 4 IV HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DURING REGROUPMENT ......................... 6 Extrajudicial executions ......................................................................................... 6 Property destruction ............................................................................................... 8 Possible prisoners of conscience............................................................................ 8 V HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN THE CAMPS ........................................... 8 Undue restrictions on freedom of movement ......................................................... 8 "Disappearances" ................................................................................................... 9 Life-threatening conditions .................................................................................. 10 Insecurity in the context of armed conflict .......................................................... 11 VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DISGUISED AS PROTECTION ................ 12 VII CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 14 VIII RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • Network of African Parliamentary Committees of Health (Neapacoh) Meeting 2018
    NETWORK OF AFRICAN PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES OF HEALTH (NEAPACOH) MEETING 2018. th st A report on the meeting proceedings, 30 -31 November 2018 Partners in Population and Development Africa Regional Office (PPD ARO) Statistics House, 9 Colville Street Phone: +256 414 705-446 Fax: +256 414 705 454 Email: [email protected] Tweeter: #ppdafrica Website: http://www.partners- popdev.org/aro/ Kampala - Uganda Network of African Parliamentary Committees of Health (NEAPACOH) Meeting, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.0 Objective of the meeting ................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Participation ..................................................................................................................... 7 Day One............................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.0 Session One: Opening ceremony ....................................................................................... 8 4.1 Remarks by Mr. Adnene Ben Haj Aissa, Executive Director, PPD ..................................... 9 4.2 Remarks by Hon. Ruth Labode, Chairperson, NEAPACOH .............................................. 10 4.3 Remarks by Mr. Alain Sibenaler, UNFPA Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Forecast
    May 2021 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 2 In Hindsight: Is There a Single Right Formula for In May, China will have the presidency of the Secu- Da’esh/ISIL (UNITAD) is also anticipated. the Arria Format? rity Council. The Council will continue to meet Other Middle East issues include meetings on: 4 Status Update since our virtually, although members may consider holding • Syria, the monthly briefings on political and April Forecast a small number of in-person meetings later in the humanitarian issues and the use of chemical 5 Peacekeeping month depending on COVID-19 conditions. weapons; China has chosen to initiate three signature • Lebanon, on the implementation of resolution 7 Yemen events in May. Early in the month, it will hold 1559 (2004), which called for the disarma- 8 Bosnia and a high-level briefing on Upholding“ multilateral- ment of all militias and the extension of gov- Herzegovina ism and the United Nations-centred internation- ernment control over all Lebanese territory; 9 Syria al system”. Wang Yi, China’s state councillor and • Yemen, the monthly meeting on recent 11 Libya minister for foreign affairs, is expected to chair developments; and 12 Upholding the meeting. Volkan Bozkir, the president of the • The Middle East (including the Palestinian Multilateralism and General Assembly, is expected to brief. Question), also the monthly meeting. the UN-Centred A high-level open debate on “Addressing the During the month, the Council is planning to International System root causes of conflict while promoting post- vote on a draft resolution to renew the South Sudan 13 Iraq pandemic recovery in Africa” is planned.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 October 2013 (The East African Legislative Assembly Met at 2.30 P.M
    EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY _______________ IN THE EAST AFRICAN LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY (EALA) The Official Report of the Proceedings of the East African Legislative Assembly 40TH SITTING: THIRD ASSEMBLY - SECOND MEETING - SECOND SESSION SPECIAL SITTING Tuesday, 22 October 2013 (The East African Legislative Assembly met at 2.30 p.m. in the Burundi National Assembly, Bujumbura, Burundi.) (Burundi National Anthem was played) (The EAC Anthem was played) PRAYER (The Speaker, Ms Margaret Nantongo Zziwa, in the Chair) (The Assembly was called to order) ______________________________________________________________________________ PROCEDURAL MOTION The Chairperson, Legal, Rules and Privileges Committee (Ms Dora Kanabahita Byamukama) (Uganda): Your Excellency, the President of the Republic of Burundi, Pierre Nkurunziza, the Rt. Hon. Speaker of the National Assembly of Burundi, Pie Ntavyohanyuma, Madam Speaker, honourable members and distinguished guests; I beg to move_ THAT, the resolution to hold sittings in the republic of Burundi be adopted. Madam Speaker, I beg to move. The Speaker: Seconded by Hon. Hafsa Mossi and Christopher Bazivamo. Proceed hon. Byamukama 1 Tuesday, 22 October 2013 East African Legislative Assembly Debates Ms. Byamukama: Madam Speaker, WHEREAS Clause 1 of Article 55 of the Treaty provides that, the meetings of the Assembly shall be held at such times and places as the Assembly may appoint WHEREAS Rule 2 of the Rules of Procedure provides that, the seat of the Assembly shall be at Arusha in the United Republic of Tanzania AND WHEREAS Sub-Rule 7 of Rule 11 provides that the Assembly may on a resolution adopted by the majority of its members decide to hold one or more sittings elsewhere within in the Partner States other than at its seat.
    [Show full text]
  • Reps Front Template
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia 122nd Inter-Parliamentary Union Assembly (Bangkok, Thailand) and bilateral visit to the People’s Republic of China Report of the Australian Parliamentary Delegation 25 March to 11 April 2010 © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 ISBN 978-0-642-79390-4 printed version For more information about the Australian Parliament visit www.aph.gov.au or contact the International and Community Relations Office: Email: [email protected] Phone: +61 2 6277 4340 Fax: +61 2 6277 2000 Contents Membership of the delegation ............................................................................................................. vi Preface ............................................................................................................................................... vii 1 122nd Inter-Parliamentary Union Assembly ........................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 General debate ........................................................................................................................... 2 Standing committees ................................................................................................................... 3 Emergency item .......................................................................................................................... 4 Special presentations .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Income Inequality in French West Africa: Building Social Tables for Pre- Independence Senegal and Ivory Coast
    Col.lecció d’Economia E19/396 Income Inequality in French West Africa: Building Social Tables for Pre- Independence Senegal and Ivory Coast Guido Alfani Federico Tadei UB Economics Working Papers 2019/396 Income Inequality in French West Africa: Building Social Tables for Pre-Independence Senegal and Ivory Coast Abstract: Sub-Saharan Africa is home today to some of the most unequal countries in the world, in Southern and Central Africa, as well as others that are close to the world average, in Western Africa. Yet, there is no consensus regarding the historical factors that led to such a situation. Given limited data on income distribution during colonial times, we do not know whether present-day inequality patterns can be traced back to the colonial period and which role was played by colonial institutions. Most of our knowledge comes from information on British colonies, while territories subjected to other colonial powers are much less well known. To address this gap, we analyze trends in income inequality for colonies in French West Africa, building social tables for Senegal and Ivory Coast during the last decades of colonial rule. We find that income inequality was high during the colonial period, because of the huge income differential between Africans and European settlers (especially in Senegal) and of high inequality within the African population (especially in the Ivory Coast). Nevertheless, it tended to reduce during colonial rule – but the trend inverted after independence. Our findings cast in a new light the connection between colonialism, extractive institutions, high inequality and inequality extraction ratios. JEL Codes: N17, O43.
    [Show full text]
  • Policies for Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility in Cities of Burkina Faso
    Page 1 Policies for sustainable mobility and accessibility in cities of Burkina Faso Page 2 ¾ SSATP – Burkina Faso - Policies for Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility in Cities – October 2019 Page 3 ¾ SSATP – Burkina Faso - Policies for Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility in Cities – October 2019 Policies for sustainable mobility and accessibility in cities of Burkina Faso An international partnership supported by: Page 4 ¾ SSATP – Burkina Faso - Policies for Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility in Cities – October 2019 The SSATP is an international partnership to facilitate policy development and related capacity building in the transport sector in Africa. Sound policies lead to safe, reliable, and cost-effective transport, freeing people to lift themselves out of poverty and helping countries to compete internationally. * * * * * * * The SSATP is a partnership of 42 African countries: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe; 8 Regional Economic Communities (RECs); 2 African institutions: African Union Commission (AUC) and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA); Financing partners for the Third Development Plan: European
    [Show full text]