Within the Genus Naegleria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Within the Genus Naegleria Closed-Tube Barcoding of Sequence Variants (Possible Species) within the Genus Naegleria Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Biology Professor Lawrence J. Wangh, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biology by John Deng May 2017 Copyright by John Deng © 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Lawrence Wangh for giving me the opportunity to pursue this project and for providing me with the financial means to make this project possible. His guidance and advice throughout this process has been invaluable. I would like to thank J. Aquiles Sanchez for his constant support and direction. I would also like to thank Nicky Sirianni for teaching me how to run experiments and Adam Osborne on the assistance and interpretation of difficult data and problems. I am grateful to Heather Schiller and to Professor Chandler Fulton for providing Naegleria samples. Finally, thank you too to all other members of the Wangh laboratory for helping to make this project successful. I have learned so much about how to be a better scientist from this process. Thank you. This research was supported in part by the Division of Science Undergraduate Research Fellowship and a Sprout grant. iii Abstract Closed-Tube Barcoding of Sequence Variants (Possible Species) Within the Naegleria Genus A thesis presented to the Department of Biology Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By John Deng This thesis provides an approach to identify and characterize the enormous diversity of Naegleria genus with Closed-Tube Barcoding. This thesis is comprised of two parts: 1) The Naegleria-Assay, which can be used to identify any species of Naegleria on earth and 2) The Fowleri-Assay, which can be used to selectively detect the “brain eating amoeba” Naegleria fowleri. In the construction of these assays, Closed-Tube Barcoding was used to generate fluorescent signatures of the CO1 gene for sequence variants of the genus Naegleria. The Naegleria-Assay can generate a unique fluorescent signature for each of the sixteen tested species of Naegleria and can even differentiate between different strains within a single species. With a few adjustments in thermal cycle and reagents, this assay can be transformed into the Fowleri-Assay, which can identify as few as ten copies of Naegleria fowleri in a background of up to 10,000 copies of DNA from other Naegleria species. The iv efficiency of this reaction is 91%. These assays indicate that a single set of probes can be used to characterize an entire diverse genus and can provide critical information about the diversity and range of the Naegleria genus as well as identify the pathogenic species Naegleria fowleri. v Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Traditional Methods of Species Identification are Inadequate ......................................................................... 1 Is DNA Barcoding a Solution for Rapid Identification of Species? ................................................................... 4 Benefits of DNA Barcoding? ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Problems with DNA Barcoding ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Closed-Tube Barcoding ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Closed-Tube Barcoding of Naegleria ......................................................................................................................... 13 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................................... 16 Final PCR Composition .................................................................................................................................................... 16 Primer Design ...................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Taq Polymerase .................................................................................................................................................................. 18 ThermaStop™ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 19 ThermaStop™ Concentration ........................................................................................................................................ 19 ThermaMark™ Concentration ...................................................................................................................................... 21 Probe Design ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Probe Concentration ........................................................................................................................................................ 25 Other PCR Reagents: ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 Naegleria Target DNA: ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Target DNA Concentration ............................................................................................................................................ 28 Thermal Cycle ...................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Final PCR Composition and Setup .............................................................................................................................. 29 Results ................................................................................................................................................... 31 In Silico Tests of Naegleria Consensus Probes Against Selected Eukaryotes .......................................... 31 In Silico Test of Naegleria Consensus Probes Against the Naegleria Genus. ............................................ 34 Naegleria-Assay Fluorescent Signatures ................................................................................................................. 36 Fowleri-Assay ...................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Testing Naegleria-Assay Conditions with the Fowleri-Assay ......................................................................... 49 Increasing the Stringency of the Fowleri-Assay ................................................................................................... 50 Increasing the Copy Number of Related Naegleria Species ............................................................................. 51 Testing ThermaMark™ Concentrations .................................................................................................................... 52 Testing Different versions of ThermaMark™ ......................................................................................................... 53 Dilution series in a background of 105 copies of synthetic Naegleria gruberi DNA .............................. 55 Dilution series in a background of real Naegleria gruberi DNA .................................................................... 56 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................. 59 Naegleria Assay .................................................................................................................................................................. 59 Fowleri-Assay ...................................................................................................................................................................... 60 Challenges ............................................................................................................................................................................. 61 Future Directions ............................................................................................................................................................... 61 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 63 References ............................................................................................................................................ 64 vi List of Tables Table 1: Sequence and Melting Temperatures of Fowleri-Assay and Naegleria-Assay ________ 18 Table 2: ON/OFF Probe Sequences _______________________________________________________________ 23 Table 3: List of OtHer Tested Species In-Silico ___________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Insight Into the Lifestyle of Amoeba Willaertia Magna During Bioreactor Growth Using Transcriptomics and Proteomics
    microorganisms Article Insight into the Lifestyle of Amoeba Willaertia magna during Bioreactor Growth Using Transcriptomics and Proteomics Issam Hasni 1,2,3, Philippe Decloquement 1, Sandrine Demanèche 2 , Rayane Mouh Mameri 2, Olivier Abbe 2, Philippe Colson 1,3 and Bernard La Scola 1,3,* 1 Aix-Marseille University, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement IRD 198, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Microbes, Evolution, Phylogeny and Infection (MEFI), UM63, 13005 Marseille, France; [email protected] (I.H.); [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (P.C.) 2 R&D Department, Amoéba, 69680 Chassieu, France; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (R.M.M.); [email protected] (O.A.) 3 Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU)—Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-4-9132-4375; Fax: +33-4-9138-7772 Received: 5 May 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: Willaertia magna C2c maky is a thermophilic free-living amoeba strain that showed ability to eliminate Legionella pneumophila, a pathogenic bacterium living in the aquatic environment. The amoeba industry has proposed the use of Willaertia magna as a natural biocide to control L. pneumophila proliferation in cooling towers. Here, transcriptomic and proteomic studies were carried out in order to expand knowledge on W. magna produced in a bioreactor. Illumina RNA-seq generated 217 million raw reads. A total of 8790 transcripts were identified, of which 6179 and 5341 were assigned a function through comparisons with National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) reference sequence and the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) databases, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Protistology an International Journal Vol
    Protistology An International Journal Vol. 10, Number 2, 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORUM «PROTIST–2016» Yuri Mazei (Vice-Chairman) Welcome Address 2 Organizing Committee 3 Organizers and Sponsors 4 Abstracts 5 Author Index 94 Forum “PROTIST-2016” June 6–10, 2016 Moscow, Russia Website: http://onlinereg.ru/protist-2016 WELCOME ADDRESS Dear colleagues! Republic) entitled “Diplonemids – new kids on the block”. The third lecture will be given by Alexey The Forum “PROTIST–2016” aims at gathering Smirnov (Saint Petersburg State University, Russia): the researchers in all protistological fields, from “Phylogeny, diversity, and evolution of Amoebozoa: molecular biology to ecology, to stimulate cross- new findings and new problems”. Then Sandra disciplinary interactions and establish long-term Baldauf (Uppsala University, Sweden) will make a international scientific cooperation. The conference plenary presentation “The search for the eukaryote will cover a wide range of fundamental and applied root, now you see it now you don’t”, and the fifth topics in Protistology, with the major focus on plenary lecture “Protist-based methods for assessing evolution and phylogeny, taxonomy, systematics and marine water quality” will be made by Alan Warren DNA barcoding, genomics and molecular biology, (Natural History Museum, United Kingdom). cell biology, organismal biology, parasitology, diversity and biogeography, ecology of soil and There will be two symposia sponsored by ISoP: aquatic protists, bioindicators and palaeoecology. “Integrative co-evolution between mitochondria and their hosts” organized by Sergio A. Muñoz- The Forum is organized jointly by the International Gómez, Claudio H. Slamovits, and Andrew J. Society of Protistologists (ISoP), International Roger, and “Protists of Marine Sediments” orga- Society for Evolutionary Protistology (ISEP), nized by Jun Gong and Virginia Edgcomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Free-Living Amoebae
    School of Doctoral Studies in Biological Sciences University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Faculty of Science Diversity, phylogeny and phylogeography of free-living amoebae Ph.D. Thesis RNDr. Tomáš Tyml Supervisor: Mgr. Martin Kostka, Ph.D. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Specialist adviser: Prof. MVDr. Iva Dyková, Dr.Sc. Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University České Budějovice 2016 This thesis should be cited as: Tyml, T. 2016. Diversity, phylogeny and phylogeography of free living amoebae. Ph.D. Thesis Series, No. 13. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, School of Doctoral Studies in Biological Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 135 pp. Annotation This thesis consists of seven published papers on free-living amoebae (FLA), members of Amoebozoa, Excavata: Heterolobosea, and Cercozoa, and covers three main topics: (i) FLA as potential fish pathogens, (ii) diversity and phylogeography of FLA, and (iii) FLA as hosts of prokaryotic organisms. Diverse methodological approaches were used including culture-dependent techniques for isolation and identification of free-living amoebae, molecular phylogenetics, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and transmission electron microscopy. Declaration [in Czech] Prohlašuji, že svoji disertační práci jsem vypracoval samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své disertační práce, a to v úpravě vzniklé vypuštěním vyznačených částí archivovaných Přírodovědeckou fakultou elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Virulence Factor of Pathogenic Bacteria Database (VFDB)70
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Investigation of potential pathogenicity of Willaertia magna by investigating the transfer of bacteria pathogenicity genes into its genome Issam Hasni1,2, Nisrine Chelkha1, Emeline Baptiste1, Mouh Rayane Mameri2, Joel Lachuer3,4,5, Fabrice Plasson2, Philippe Colson 1 & Bernard La Scola1* Willaertia magna c2c maky is a thermophilic amoeba closely related to the genus Naegleria. This free-living amoeba has the ability to eliminate Legionella pneumophila, which is an amoeba-resisting bacterium living in an aquatic environment. To prevent the proliferation of L. pneumophila in cooling towers, the use of W. magna as natural biocide has been proposed. To provide a better understanding of the W. magna genome, whole-genome sequencing was performed through the study of virulence factors and lateral gene transfers. This amoeba harbors a genome of 36.5 megabases with 18,519 predicted genes. BLASTp analyses reported protein homology between 136 W. magna sequences and amoeba-resistant microorganisms. Horizontal gene transfers were observed based on the basis of the phylogenetic reconstruction hypothesis. We detected 15 homologs of N. fowleri genes related to virulence, although these latter were also found in the genome of N. gruberi, which is a non-pathogenic amoeba. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity test performed on human cells supports the hypothesis that the strain c2c maky is a non-pathogenic amoeba. This work explores the genomic repertory for the frst draft genome of genus Willaertia and provides genomic data for further comparative studies on virulence of related pathogenic amoeba, N. fowleri. Heterolobosea is a rich class of species of heterotrophs, almost all free-living, containing pathogenic (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Protista (PDF)
    1 = Astasiopsis distortum (Dujardin,1841) Bütschli,1885 South Scandinavian Marine Protoctista ? Dingensia Patterson & Zölffel,1992, in Patterson & Larsen (™ Heteromita angusta Dujardin,1841) Provisional Check-list compiled at the Tjärnö Marine Biological * Taxon incertae sedis. Very similar to Cryptaulax Skuja Laboratory by: Dinomonas Kent,1880 TJÄRNÖLAB. / Hans G. Hansson - 1991-07 - 1997-04-02 * Taxon incertae sedis. Species found in South Scandinavia, as well as from neighbouring areas, chiefly the British Isles, have been considered, as some of them may show to have a slightly more northern distribution, than what is known today. However, species with a typical Lusitanian distribution, with their northern Diphylleia Massart,1920 distribution limit around France or Southern British Isles, have as a rule been omitted here, albeit a few species with probable norhern limits around * Marine? Incertae sedis. the British Isles are listed here until distribution patterns are better known. The compiler would be very grateful for every correction of presumptive lapses and omittances an initiated reader could make. Diplocalium Grassé & Deflandre,1952 (™ Bicosoeca inopinatum ??,1???) * Marine? Incertae sedis. Denotations: (™) = Genotype @ = Associated to * = General note Diplomita Fromentel,1874 (™ Diplomita insignis Fromentel,1874) P.S. This list is a very unfinished manuscript. Chiefly flagellated organisms have yet been considered. This * Marine? Incertae sedis. provisional PDF-file is so far only published as an Intranet file within TMBL:s domain. Diplonema Griessmann,1913, non Berendt,1845 (Diptera), nec Greene,1857 (Coel.) = Isonema ??,1???, non Meek & Worthen,1865 (Mollusca), nec Maas,1909 (Coel.) PROTOCTISTA = Flagellamonas Skvortzow,19?? = Lackeymonas Skvortzow,19?? = Lowymonas Skvortzow,19?? = Milaneziamonas Skvortzow,19?? = Spira Skvortzow,19?? = Teixeiromonas Skvortzow,19?? = PROTISTA = Kolbeana Skvortzow,19?? * Genus incertae sedis.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis Places Percolomonas Cosmopolites
    1. Eukuryof. Milmhrol.. Sl(5). 2004 pp. S75-581 0 2004 by the Society of Protozoologists Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis Places Percolomonas cosmopolitus within Heterolobosea: Evolutionary Implications SERGEY I. NIKOLAEV; ALEXANDRE P. MYLNIKOV,” CEDRIC BERNEY; JOSE FAHRNI; JAN PAWLOWSKI; VLADIMIR V. ALESHIN” and NIKOLAY B. PETROVaJ “Departmentof Evolutionary Biochemistry. A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, and bInstitutefor Biology of Inland Waters, RAS, Yaroslavskaya obl,, Borok, Russia, and ‘Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ABSTRACT. Percolomonas cosmopolitus is a common free-living flagellate of uncertain phylogenetic position that was placed within the Heterolobosea on the basis of ultrastructure studies. To test the relationship between Percolomonas and Heterolobosea, we analysed the primary structure of the actin and small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) genes of P. cosmopolitus as well as the predicted secondary structure of the SSU rRNA. Percolornonus shares common secondary structure patterns of the SSU rRNA with heterolobosean taxa, which, together with the results of actin gene analysis, confirms that it is closely related to Heterolobosea. Phylogenetic recon- structions based on the sequences of the SSU rRNA gene suggest Percolomonas belongs to the family Vahlkampfiidae. The first Bayesian analysis of a large taxon sampling of heterolobosean SSU rRNA genes clarifies the phylogenetic relationships within this group. Key Words. Helix 17, Heterolobosea, phylogeny, SSU rRNA, V3 region. HE free-living flagellate Percolornonas cosmopolitus is al. 1990). Later, the class Lyromonadea was especially estab- T common and widespread in surface coastal and oceanic lished to include P. lanterna (Cavalier-Smith 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • ATCC® Protistology Culture Guide Tips and Techniques for Propagating Protozoa and Algae
    ATCC® PROTISTOLOGY CULTURE GUIDE tips and techniques for propagating protozoa and algae THE ESSENTIALS OF LIFE SCIENCE RESEARCH GLOBALLY DELIVERED™ Table of Contents Getting Started with an ATCC Protist Strain...1 Biosafety and Disposal .................................................27 Product Sheet .............................................................1 Biosafety ....................................................................27 Preparation of Medium ...........................................1 Disposal of Infectious Materials ........................27 Opening Glass Ampoules .......................................1 Initiating Frozen Cultures .......................................3 Protist Authentication ..................................................28 Initiating Freeze-Dried Cultures ...........................3 Phenotypic Characterization .............................28 Handling Live Protist Cultures Upon Arrival ....3 Genotypic Characterization .............................28 Protist Growth and Propagation ............................4 Protist Applications ........................................................29 Properties of Protists ................................................4 Bioassays ...................................................................29 Protist Metabolism ....................................................6 Biofuel Production .................................................29 Protist Propagation ...................................................7 Fatty Acid Production ...........................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdoms & Domains
    KINGDOMS & DOMAINS An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth Lynn Margulis University of Massachusetts at Amherst Michael J. Chapman Marine Biological Laboratory Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO ' SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO ELSEVIER Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier CONTENTS List of Figures xi SUBKINGDOM (DOMAIN) EUBACTERIA 65 List of Tables lix Division Gracilicutes (Gram-negative bacteria) Foreword E. O. Wilson lxi Phylum B-3 Proteobacteria purple bacteria: phototrophs, Foreword to 1st to 3rd editions Stephen Jay Gould lxiii heterotrophs 68 Preface lxvii Azotohacter, Escherichia, Nitrobacter Acknowledgments lxxi Phylum B-4 Spirochaetae helical motile heterotrophs, periplasmic flagella 76 INTRODUCTION 3 Diplocalyx, Spirochaeta, Spirosymplokos Phylum B-5 Bacteroides-Saprospirae gliding fermenters, Box I-i: The wisdom of Darwin and Gould 5 heterotrophs 80 Classification of life, names of organisms • The cell as a Bacteroides, Saprospira, Spowcytophaga unit; the kingdoms of life • Plant or animal? History of the Phylum B-6 Cyanobacteria oxygenic highest taxa • Undulipodia, centrioles, and kinetosomes • photoautotrophs 82 Sex and reproduction • Kingdoms and domain criteria • Anabaena, Nostoc, Oscillatoria Viruses Phylum B-7 Chloroflexa gliding nonsulfur oxygen- Box I-ii: Life is growth 19 tolerant photoautotrophs 86 Chloroflexus, Heliothrix, Oscillochbris The Environment 23 Earth history: The geologic record • Seven "ecostrips":
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Free-Living Amoebae in Soils and Their Associated Human
    Diversity of free-living amoebae in soils and their associated human opportunistic bacteria Elodie Denet, Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland, Sylvie Nazaret, Michel Pélandakis, Sabine Favre-Bonté To cite this version: Elodie Denet, Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland, Sylvie Nazaret, Michel Pélandakis, Sabine Favre-Bonté. Diversity of free-living amoebae in soils and their associated human opportunistic bacteria. Parasitol- ogy Research, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2017, 116 (11), pp.3151-3162. 10.1007/s00436-017-5632-6. hal-02335511 HAL Id: hal-02335511 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02335511 Submitted on 29 Oct 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Parasitol Res (2017) 116:3151–3162 DOI 10.1007/s00436-017-5632-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Diversity of free-living amoebae in soils and their associated human opportunistic bacteria Elodie Denet1,2 & Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland2,3 & Sylvie Nazaret1 & Michel Pélandakis2 & Sabine Favre-Bonté1 Received: 17 July 2017 /Accepted: 21 September 2017 /Published online: 7 October 2017 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Free-living amoebae (FLA) are ubiquitous proto- French alpine soil (77%). Some genera were only present in zoa found worldwide in the environment. They feed by one out of the four soils analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Heterolobosea
    1 Diversity of Heterolobosea Tomáš Pánek and Ivan Čepička Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic 1. Introduction Heterolobosea is a small group of amoebae, amoeboflagellates and flagellates (ca. 140 described species). Since heterolobosean amoebae are highly reminiscent of naked lobose amoebae of Amoebozoa, they were for a long time treated as members of Rhizopoda (Levine, 1980). The class Heterolobosea was established in 1985 by Page and Blanton (Page & Blanton, 1985) by uniting unicellular Schizopyrenida with Acrasida that form multicellular bodies. Later, it was suggested that Heterolobosea might be related to Euglenozoa (e.g., Trypanosoma, Euglena) instead of other amoebae (Cavalier-Smith, 1998; Patterson, 1988). This assumption based on the cell structure was supported also by early multigene phylogenetic analyses (Baldauf et al., 2000). Currently, the Heterolobosea is nested together with Euglenozoa, Jakobida, Parabasalia, Fornicata, Preaxostyla, Malawimonas, and Tsukubamonas within the eukaryotic supergroup Excavata (Hampl et al., 2009; Rodríguez-Ezpeleta et al., 2007; Simpson, 2003; Yabuki et al., 2011). The excavate organisms were originally defined on the basis of the structure of flagellar system and ventral feeding groove (Simpson & Patterson, 1999). However, Heterolobosea have lost some of these structures (Simpson, 2003). The most important heterolobosean taxon is the genus Naegleria as N. fowleri is a deadly parasite of humans (Visvesvara et al., 2007) and N. gruberi is a model organism in the research of assembly of the flagellar apparatus (Lee, 2010). Both the species have been studied in detail for decades and genome sequence of N. gruberi was recently published (Fritz-Laylin et al. 2010). On the other hand, the other heteroloboseans are considerably understudied and undescribed despite their enormous ecological and morphological diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes
    PROF. SINA ADL (Orcid ID : 0000-0001-6324-6065) PROF. DAVID BASS (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-9883-7823) DR. CÉDRIC BERNEY (Orcid ID : 0000-0001-8689-9907) DR. PACO CÁRDENAS (Orcid ID : 0000-0003-4045-6718) DR. IVAN CEPICKA (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-4322-0754) DR. MICAH DUNTHORN (Orcid ID : 0000-0003-1376-4109) PROF. BENTE EDVARDSEN (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-6806-4807) DR. DENIS H. LYNN (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-1554-7792) DR. EDWARD A.D MITCHELL (Orcid ID : 0000-0003-0358-506X) PROF. JONG SOO PARK (Orcid ID : 0000-0001-6253-5199) DR. GUIFRÉ TORRUELLA (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-6534-4758) Article DR. VASILY V. ZLATOGURSKY (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-2688-3900) Article type : Original Article Corresponding author mail id: [email protected] Adl et al.---Classification of Eukaryotes Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Sina M. Adla, David Bassb,c, Christopher E. Laned, Julius Lukeše,f, Conrad L. Schochg, Alexey Smirnovh, Sabine Agathai, Cedric Berneyj, Matthew W. Brownk,l, Fabien Burkim, Paco Cárdenasn, Ivan Čepičkao, Ludmila Chistyakovap, Javier del Campoq, Micah Dunthornr,s, Bente Edvardsent, Yana Eglitu, Laure Guillouv, Vladimír Hamplw, Aaron A. Heissx, Mona Hoppenrathy, Timothy Y. Jamesz, Sergey Karpovh, Eunsoo Kimx, Martin Koliskoe, Alexander Kudryavtsevh,aa, Daniel J. G. Lahrab, Enrique Laraac,ad, Line Le Gallae, Denis H. Lynnaf,ag, David G. Mannah, Ramon Massana i Moleraq, Edward A. D. Mitchellac,ai , Christine Morrowaj, Jong Soo Parkak, Jan W. Pawlowskial, Martha J. Powellam, Daniel J. Richteran, Sonja Rueckertao, Lora Shadwickap, Satoshi Shimanoaq, Frederick W. Spiegelap, Guifré Torruella i Cortesar, Noha Youssefas, Vasily Zlatogurskyh,at, Qianqian Zhangau,av.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Targets for Cannabinoid Action in the Ciliate Tetrahymena Pyriformis
    An investigation into the targets for cannabinoid action in the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis Nadia Wanlahbeh Under the supervision of Dr. Jackie Parry & Dr. Karen Wright MSc Biomedical Science (by research) Research Project Academic year 2017/2018 1 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisor Dr. Jackie Parry and Dr. Karen Wright. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgement 5 Glossary 6 Abstract 8 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 9 1.1. The human endocannabinoid system ...................................................................... 10 1.2. The main cannabinoid ligands ................................................................................. 12 1.3. The metabolizing enzymes ....................................................................................... 13 1.3.1. Biosynthesising enzyme..................................................................................... 14 1.3.2. Catalysing enzyme ............................................................................................. 15 1.4. The Main Cannabinoid Receptors – CB and Non-CB .......................................... 17 1.4.1. Cannabinoid receptor: CB1 and CB2 .................................................................
    [Show full text]