God and the Quest for Authenticity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GOD AND THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN MOSES MENDELSSOHN AND IMMANUEL KANT A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by James W. Haring _______________________________________ Gerald P. McKenny, Director Graduate Program in Theology Notre Dame, Indiana December, 2020 © Copyright 2020 James W. Haring GOD AND THE QUEST FOR AUTHENTICITY IN MOSES MENDELSSOHN AND IMMANUEL KANT Abstract by James W. Haring Though personal authenticity is an organizing ideal of late-modern Western societies, it also is a site of some of our most contentious disagreements, lacks coherence in many of its formulations, is not fully understood in all of its implications, and is often unidentified in its function as a marker of social distinction. There is a need for conceptual clarification and deeper historical understanding of the ideal of authenticity. Scholarship on authenticity has argued that it was birthed by nineteenth-century Romanticism and popularized in the counter-culture movements of the 1960’s. On this understanding, authenticity is distinct from previous moral ideals, especially rationalist ones, exemplified by Immanuel Kant’s notion of autonomy. But pre-romantic moral rationalism was itself motivated by an ideal of authenticity. Authenticity is not a deviation from the ideal of rational autonomy. On the contrary, rational autonomy is one of a long series of attempts to generate philosophical and religious programs which meet the requirements of authenticity understood as a norm of validity applicable across diverse but analogous domains, such as aesthetics, metaphysics, semantics, and ethics. James W. Haring This study analyzes the concept of authenticity as it appears in the writings of Kant and his contemporary, Moses Mendelssohn. Their writings reveal the religious shape of the ideal of authenticity in two religious traditions and illustrate how authenticity as a moral ideal is best understood as an attempt to overcome religious and philosophical idols. Both Mendelssohn and Kant rely on the Pauline distinction between the spirit and the letter as a shorthand for the distinction between the authentic and the idolatrous. Both retain a place for ‘the letter,’ which mitigates the rigorous demands of authenticity, but they configure the relationship between spirit and letter differently, in ways that track with broader commitments about the relationship between signs and meanings, body and soul, and historical and natural religion. The study concludes by observing how authenticity can be used as a tool for social exclusion and intolerance, while pointing toward the possibility of constructing more inclusive conceptions of authenticity by retrieving the best insights of the past from authors such as Mendelssohn and Kant. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................... iv Citations and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Methodological considerations ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 Authenticity: a preview ................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Précis ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: Authenticity: historical and conceptual considerations .................................. 23 2.1 Authenticity as a norm of validity .............................................................................. 26 2.2 Authenticity and idolatry ............................................................................................... 29 2.3 Authenticity and the spirit-letter distinction ........................................................ 38 Chapter 3: Authenticity and the spirit-letter distinction in Moses Mendelssohn .......................................................................................................................................... 48 3.1 Mendelssohn’s writings and influence .................................................................... 51 3.2 Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem: intellectual and historical context ...................... 58 3.3 Authenticity, the spirit, and the letter in Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem ................................................................................................................................... 68 Chapter 4: Idolatry: semiotics and metaphysics ........................................................................ 87 4.1 Mendelssohn’s theory of signs .................................................................................... 88 4.2 Plato’s Phaedrus and Mendelssohn’s critique of writing ............................. 104 4.3 Maimonides on idolatry and divine attributes ................................................. 113 4.4 Mendelssohn on idolatry and divine attributes ............................................... 120 Chapter 5: Divine beauty, veiled lightly: The moral aesthetics of ceremonial law ................................................................................................................................... 132 5.1 Ceremonial law as symbolic language .................................................................. 136 5.2 Pleasure and mixed sentiments .............................................................................. 148 5.3 The sublime ...................................................................................................................... 155 5.4 Naive signs ........................................................................................................................ 160 5.5 Ceremonial law and moral formation .................................................................. 168 ii 5.6 Authenticity in Mendelssohn: Retrospective and Objections ..................... 185 Chapter 6: Authenticity and the spirit-letter distinction in Immanuel Kant .............. 190 6.1 Kant’s relationship to Mendelssohn ....................................................................... 196 6.2 Authenticity, purity, and sincerity in Kant’s philosophy .............................. 205 6.3 Authentic moral dispositions and the spirit-letter distinction ................... 223 Chapter 7: A dazzling yet defrauding semblance: Idolatry and the letter in Kant’s philosophy ............................................................................................................................. 228 7.1 A matter of translation: semblance and illusion ............................................... 233 7.2 The types of semblance ................................................................................................ 246 7.3 Idolatry and transcendental semblance ............................................................... 254 7.3.1 Spinozism, atheism, and nihilism .......................................................... 255 7.3.2 Anthropomorphism and the transcendental ideal ........................ 264 7.4 Interlude: Idolatry, the spirit, and the letter in Kant and Mendelssohn ........................................................................................................................ 280 7.5 The nature of delusion ................................................................................................. 284 7.6 Delusion and the moral law ....................................................................................... 289 7.7 Idolatry as religious delusion .................................................................................... 296 Chapter 8: Spirit, authenticity, and the indispensability of the letter ........................... 301 8.1 Authenticity and the letter in Kant’s political philosophy ........................... 302 8.2 Authenticity and the letter in Kant’s moral philosophy ................................ 309 8.3 Authenticity and the letter in Kant’s aesthetics ................................................ 312 8.4 Authenticity and the letter in Kant’s philosophy of religion ....................... 325 8.4.1 The spirit-letter distinction as a principle of biblical interpretation ........................................................................................................ 326 8.4.2 The spirit and the letter in Kant’s ecclesiology ............................... 335 8.4.3 The letter as a provisional but indispensable means to the end of pure religion ..................................................................................... 340 8.4.4 The indispensability of the letter in the religious education of the human race .......................................................................... 345 8.4.5 Kant and Mendelssohn on oaths ............................................................ 354 8.5 Moral progress, grace, and the letter .................................................................... 357 8.6 The letter, the body, and the resurrection of the dead ................................... 374 Chapter 9: Conclusion ........................................................................................................................